ANKARA: Top US Senator Backs ‘Genocide’ Resolution

TOP US SENATOR BACKS ‘GENOCIDE’ RESOLUTION

Hurriyet Daily News
Nov 20 2009
Turkey

U.S. Senator Harry Reid has agreed to co-sponsor a Senate resolution
calling on the United States to formally recognize World War I-era
killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire as "genocide."

The development was welcomed by U.S. Armenian groups.

"The Armenian Assembly of America [or AAA] welcomed news that Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada, has agreed to
cosponsor S. Res. 316, the Armenian genocide resolution," the AAA
said in a written statement late Thursday.

"With his leadership role in the U.S. Senate as majority leader, Sen.

Reid’s addition to the resolution greatly strengthens the growing
list of cosponsors," said Hirair Hovnanian, chairman of the AAA board
of trustees.

The Senate resolution was introduced in October by Democratic Sen.

Robert Menendez and his Republican colleague John Ensign. In a
letter sent to the secretary of state in late October, Reid voiced
his "Nevada constituents’ concerns" over a historic reconciliation
agreement signed between Turkey and Armenia.

Ankara-Yerevan deal

The Turkish and Armenian foreign ministers signed a set of agreements
Oct. 10 under which Ankara and Yerevan would set up normal diplomatic
relations and reopen their land border. The deal, if ratified by the
parliaments of Turkey and Armenia, would effectively end decades of
hostile relations.

But U.S. Armenians are solely focusing on the objective of winning
formal U.S. recognition of the Armenian killings as "genocide."

In addition to the Senate bill, a similar resolution on "genocide
recognition" has been pending in the House of Representatives,
Congress’ lower chamber, since February.

That resolution now has the support of 148 lawmakers out of the 435
House members, the AAA said separately Thursday.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration staunchly supports the
Turkish-Armenian reconciliation deal. Analysts suggest that as long
as that deal progresses, genocide-recognition resolutions in the
House and the Senate have little chance of being endorsed.

The Session Of The Heads Of The Governments Of The CIS Countries Ope

THE SESSION OF THE HEADS OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE CIS COUNTRIES OPENED TODAY IN YALTA

ARMENPRESS
NOVEMBER 20, 2009
YALTA

YALTA, NOVEMBER 20, ARMENPRESS: The session of the heads of the
governments of the CIS countries opened today in Yalta. The narrow
meeting will last for an hour and will be followed by an extended
session. No press conference is planned for summing up the results
of meeting.

IMF Issues Loans To Armenia Due To "Mild" Policy On Turkey, Karabakh

IMF ISSUES LOANS TO ARMENIA DUE TO "MILD" POLICY ON TURKEY, KARABAKH

Haykakan Zhamanak
Nov 13 2009
Armenia

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) continues to provide loans
to Armenia due to Armenia’s "mild" position in the process of
normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations and the Nagornyy Karabakh
settlement although the Armenian government violates a condition for
the provision of IMF loans.

The Armenian government has broken one of the "important conditions"
for the provision of IMF loans to Armenia, which is that the Armenian
government should stay committed to its policy of floating exchange
rate of the Armenian national currency dram, the paper said. Instead,
the Armenian government spent about 700m dollars from its foreign
reserves to keep the dram stable at the end of 2008 and beginning of
2009, the paper quoted the IMF’s permanent representative to Armenia,
Nienke Oomes, as telling a news conference in Yerevan on 12 November.

The paper said the move could have been a basis for the aggravation of
relations between Armenia and the IMF. However, after a 480m-dollar
IMF loan had been spent to replenish Armenia’s foreign reserves,
the IMF decided on 30 October to provide Armenia with an additional
60m-dolalr loan, Nienke Oomes told the news conference.

Armenia’s Central Bank has spent 180m dollars to keep the exchange rate
stable within the past couple of months, and the bank was carrying
out another 3.5m-dollar intervention at the moment Oomes was holding
the news conference, Haykakan Zhamanak said in a separate report on
13 November. Oomes told the news conference that the IMF criticized
the government, but not in public, and added she was trying to
convince the Armenian authorities not to carry out interventions in
January-March 2009, but in vain, Haykakan Zhamanak reported. The IMF
and international financial organizations, in general, are supporting
the Armenian authorities in their best way "exclusively in exchange
for [Armenia’s] ‘mild’ position displayed in the improvement of
Armenian-Turkish relations and the issue of the Karabakh settlement",
the paper quoted unnamed pro-government experts as saying. The experts
believe that the IMF is carrying out a "risk-free" test on Armenia.

"Even if the test is not successful, Armenia will owe the IMF money
and will depend on it even more," Haykakan Zhamanak reported.

Armenia’s Central Bank announced on 3 March 2009 that it would be
guided by a floating dram exchange rate from that time on, with the
dram depreciating by 22 per cent within one day alone. The World
Bank’s Armenia office welcomed the depreciation of the dram and the
International Monetary Fund announced the provision of a 540m-dollar
loan to Armenia, Haykakan Zhamanak reported on 4 March. The paper
opined that the shift to the floating exchange rate was "primarily to
the benefit of oligarchs" and was an attempt to "create an illusion
of stability so that ahead of the 1 March [opposition] rally people
do not understand what disaster will come". Interventions worth 600m
dollars were made in the domestic market out of only 1.6bn dollars of
Armenia’s foreign reserves in order to maintain 305 drams per dollar
exchange rate, Haykakan Zhamanak reported on 4 March. The chairman
of the country’s Central Bank, Artur Javadyan, said on 3 March that
the dram exchange rate would be 360-380 drams per dollar in 2009,
Haykakan Zhamanak reported on 4 March.

BAKU: Azerbaijan Expects Change In Armenia’s Negotiating Position

AZERBAIJAN EXPECTS CHANGE IN ARMENIA’S NEGOTIATING POSITION

news.az
Nov 19 2009
Azerbaijan

Araz Azimov The Azerbaijani and Armenian presidents are expected
to meet in Munich before the end of the month, Azerbaijan’s deputy
foreign minister, Araz Azimov, told reporters today.

He said that the Azerbaijani side is expecting in-depth discussions
on the settlement of the Karabakh conflict at the meeting.

"We expect changes in Armenia’s position. If no such changes are made,
it is impossible to speak of development in the negotiation process,"
Azimov said.

He said that Azerbaijan’s position is completely clear. "We want the
conflict settlement within the framework of the territorial integrity
of our country. International law is the basis of Azerbaijan’s position
which is supported by the world community."

The deputy foreign minister said that Armenia’s position does not
meet the principles and norms of international law.

"Though the Armenian side speaks of their readiness to settle the
issue peacefully, we do not see any compliance with the norms and
principles of international law in their position," Azimov said. "On
the contrary, we have recently seen a reverse trend in the Armenian
position. If Armenia continues to violate the territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan and to seek to annex part of the occupied lands, ignoring
the adopted principles and resolutions, this means Armenia is not in
the negotiation process."

Azimov said that Azerbaijan has no hidden intentions behind its
position.

Turkey

He also commented on Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu’s remarks
that "the Armenian-Turkish border will not open without resolution
of the Karabakh conflict".

"I see that from the very beginning Turkey has concentrated on the
settlement of regional problems. Turkey has always been Azerbaijan’s
closest partner and many issues in the conflict settlement may depend
on its position," Azimov said.

He said that Turkey has recently stepped up efforts in regional
processes, which greats opportunities for action to influence the
conflict settlement.

Nuclear power station

Araz Azimov went on to describe Armenia’s Metsamor nuclear power
station as a regional problem.

"Azerbaijan and the EU demand that Armenia shut down the nuclear
station, considering the weak protection of the reactors and the high
seismic activity in the area," he said.

The deputy minister said that Russia has developed a project to
improve the reactors.

"The reactors at the Armenian nuclear power station are practically
under Russia’s control. Azerbaijan would welcome it if Russia intended
to continue work in this area," Azimov said.

"Unibank" Launches Internet Banking New Service

"UNIBANK" LAUNCHES INTERNET BANKING NEW SERVICE

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
19.11.2009 15:27 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Modern scientific and technological advancement
necessitated an increased interest of population to Internet banking
service along with the traditional banking services. "Unibank" has
launched Internet banking service, press service of the bank reports.

The service is provided for free. 3 levels of security of payments
through the Internet bank are ensured: the check of login and password,
the existence of a secret key and usage of an encrypted connection. The
system automatically encrypts all transmitted information and uses
an electronic signature ensuring the necessary level of customer
identification and his orders.

To improve the quality of customer service, bank employees will attend
the introductory course on working with Internet Bank.

Armenia’s First Goal Ball Championship Off

ARMENIA’S FIRST GOAL BALL CHAMPIONSHIP OFF

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
17.11.2009 15:54 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian National Wheelchair Sports Federation
organized the first goalball championship of Armenia November 17-18.

6 teams from Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh: "Nika" (Yerevan),
"Artsivner" (Yerevan), Shirak (Gyumri), "Potorik" (Stepanakert),
"Kaytsak (Etchmiadzin)," Aryutsner "( Abovyan) take part in
championship.

Head of the European Commission Delegation in Armenia, Ambassador Raul
de Luzenberger attended the championship. "I am very pleased that
the Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs of Armenia will cooperate
with the European Commission, which pays great attention to sports
for people with disabilities," Mr. Luzenberger said.

Hans Lorenz from Austria and Gen Rayndlen from Germany are founders
of goalball. Goalball is a sport for blind people and people having
problems with vision. European and World Goalball Championships
are held.

Political Courage, Genuine Commitment And The Wisdom To Compromise C

POLITICAL COURAGE, GENUINE COMMITMENT AND THE WISDOM TO COMPROMISE CAN BRING ABOUT REMARKABLE RESULTS

armradio.am
17.11.2009 12:52

"The two processes are running in parallel and they should both go
forward as rapidly as their own respective dynamics make it possible,"
the Foreign Minister of Switzerland, Michelin Calmy Rey said in
response to the question whether the normalization of Armenia-Turkey
relations would contribute to the Karabakh conflict settlement.

"We support the Minsk Group process, and we are pleased to note that
the negotiations in this framework have been going on intensively
during the last year or so. We very much hope that the forthcoming
meeting between President Aliev and President Sargsyan will again
contribute to further strengthen this positive momentum, and that an
agreement on the key principles will soon be achieved. If anything,
the normalization process between Turkey and Armenia showed that
political courage, genuine commitment and the wisdom to compromise
can bring about remarkable results. The situation in the region is
complex and delicate, but I am convinced that the positive developments
between Turkey and Armenia can and will have a positive influence,"
Michelin Calmy Rey said in an interview with APA.

What will Switzerland do as the mediator if the protocols are not
ratified by the parliaments of the two countries? "The mandate that we
received from the parties was to assist them in coming to an agreement
which would allow them to normalize their relations. This was achieved
with the conclusion and then the signing of the two protocols. Beyond
that, Switzerland remains of course in contact with the parties. We
encourage them not to lose the momentum and to proceed diligently
with the ratification process, so that the implementation of what
was agreed can rapidly start. Needless to say, we fully support this
process which, we are convinced, will greatly benefit both countries,
both peoples and eventually the whole region. We are of course ready,
if so requested by the parties, to continue to be of assistance in
this context," the Swiss Foreign Minister concluded.

Fazil Mustaf:"Council Of Europe Secretary General Was Not Correct To

FAZIL MUSTAFA: "COUNCIL OF EUROPE SECRETARY GENERAL WAS NOT CORRECT TO SAY CONCRETE WORD ABOUT ANOTHER MOTIVATION OF CHARGES"

APA
Nov 16 2009
Azerbaijan

"One blogger is in jail in each of Germany, Croatia and Finland,
two – in the United Kingdom"

Chairman of Great System Party, MP Fazil Mustafa told APA.

– Fazil Bey, recently Council of Europe Secretary General Thorbjorn
Jagland, as well as German and Norwegian embassies issued strong
statements against the Azerbaijani government regarding the court
decision about imprisonment of two young activists. How do you value
these statements?

– I advocate for approaching such issues not from political,
but legal aspect. I think any court decision can not satisfy the
parties for subjective and objective reasons and they can express
sensitive protests. But in any case, the most important issue in the
correction of any decision is to use legal opportunities till the
end. We witnessed that solution of problems not in legal aspects, but
under foreign political pressure caused undesirable results. I think
father of one of the young bloggers – honorable Hikmet Hajizadeh has
more polished position on this issue. He told journalists that they
are going to open next legal phase – appeal procedure.

We also can assist solution of the problem in this direction as members
of the parliament. My principal position is that it was not positive
case that the embassies or Council of Europe Secretary General issued
statements pressuring on Azerbaijan. It is not only question. They
can form a habit to interfere in the internal affairs of Azerbaijan
in the solution of other issues related to Armenians or others,
which can seriously damage our national interests. One blogger is
in jail in each of Germany, Croatia and Finland and two – in the
United Kingdom. How would accept the governments of those countries
if Azerbaijani embassies demanded protection of their rights or to
consider them as political prisoners. In any case, foreign embassies
have to give legal value to the court decision and not to underline
political motivation. It is confronting their diplomatic missions.

Early experience showed that political pressure of the embassies
lead to prolongation of term of imprisonment. But it would bring
more positive results if they investigate opportunities for their
releasing together with active position of country’s law-enforcement
organizations.

– Council of Europe Secretary General connected imprisonment of two
young activists with a satiric clip they released criticizing the
government. Does such statement have any legal base?

– I don’t know what clip is disputed there. But from the legal view,
the Secretary General should see the indictment even if formally. If
they quote some probabilities out of the indictment, they have to
show sources. The Council of Europe Secretary General can claim the
court decision, but it was not correct for him to say concrete word
about another motivation of the charges. As I know there were no such
claims or charges in the indictment.

– International organizations are frequently addressing the problem
of political prisoners in Azerbaijan and after the last trial,
German embassy condemned Azerbaijan in "creating two more political
prisoners". As a lawyer, what is your opinion about the notion of
"political prisoner"?

– The notion of "enemy of people" was so largely spread during
the Soviet time that the society called all persons jailed without
court decision or with other motivation "the enemies of people". Now
it could concern the notion of "political prisoner" and rebels or
domestic criminals are called so. I don’t support the cases where
"political prisoner" is used without coordination with law. Specially,
such statement by the European country, which urged for supremacy of
law, could be a question of disputes.

Azerbaijan is integrated into the mechanism of European Court and
charges out of this mechanism could be only probabilities, which have
no legal force. It is impossible to predict how the European Court,
or closer distance, the Appeal Court will react to the decision of fist
instance court. If some person is called "political prisoner", it can
be decided only by the European Court. In any case, it is determined
not by foreign embassies, but by the higher court instances. The
European Court didn’t use this phrase against any person so far. I
would like to emphasize that it would be better to pass legal trail
till the end, to unite efforts of human rights defenders and public
community instead of to direct the issue toward the political deadlock.

Along The Beaten Tracks Of Azerbaijani Mass Media Or How Milliyet Mi

ALONG THE BEATEN TRACKS OF AZERBAIJANI MASS MEDIA OR HOW MILLIYET MISQUOTED PHILLIP GORDON

ArmInfo
2009-11-16 16:09:00

ArmInfo. Philip H. Gordon, assistant secretary of state for Europe
and Eurasian affairs, who was on an official visit to Ankara to
organize the visit of Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan to Washington
in early December, voiced a statement regarding normalization of the
Armenian-Turkish relations and the Karabakh conflict.

Turkish Hurriyet Daily and Today’s Zaman reported that Gordon
reiterated the official stance of Washington on the given issues
which was repeatedly voiced also by the US Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton.

The above Turkish newspapers reported Phil Gordon as saying that the
signing of the Protocols "really is a historic process and from which
both sides could benefit immensely." "We don’t link the two issues
because we think that they are both, that Turkey-Armenia normalization
is important and a good thing in its own right. It shouldn’t be linked
to anything else and we also support Nagorno-Karabakh settlement
because we think it would benefit both parties and it doesn’t need to
be linked to anything else. So we are actively working as co-chairs
of the Minsk group on the Nagorno-Karabakh solution, regardless of
anything else: So for the same reason we want to promote reconciliation
between Turkey and Armenia we want to promote it between Armenian
and Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh, to be engaged from that process
and it’s difficult if it wasn’t then it wouldn’t be stuck where it
is for so long."

However, the Turkish Milliyet has probably resolved to follow the
beaten tracks of Azerbaijani Mass Media for some reasons known only to
it. In joy of Azerbaijani mass media, Milliyet distorted the statements
by the American official. Thus, Milliyet reported Gordon as saying
that "approval of the recently signed Turkey-Armenia agreement on
normalizing ties in the Turkish parliament is complicated without
progress in settling the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Upper
(Nagorno) Garabagh."

It is not worthy to say that Azerbaijani mass media, in advance of
each other, have disseminated just this last option of Gorgon’s words,
which they undoubtedly liked more. It is obvious that Azerbaijani
journalists did not strive to understand how much these words meet
reality, and could the functionary of such a high level make such
statements, which have nothing in common either with the officially
voiced position of Washington or Gordon’s statements voiced earlier,
including during the press- conference in Yerevan, in June of the
current year. He said that there should be no pre-condition in the
matter of normalization of the Armenian-Turkish relations. It is a
separate process and should not be linked to any process including
settlement of the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict. The Armenian-Turkish
relations should be established within the reasonable terms, he said.

The American Embassy in Armenia gave Arminfo full version of Gordon’s
words regarding the issues that interest us. To note, Gordon watched
the Armenian-Turkish and Karabakh processes separately.

Here is the excerpt from US Embassy Transcript: A/S Phil Gordon: That’s
another important set of issues. Let me take them up separately. On
Turkey-Armenia we are very pleased that the countries reached
this historic agreement on Oct. 10th. Signing the two protocols on
normalization of relations and development of relations.

This really is a historic process and from which both sides could
benefit immensely. We applaud the courage and vision of the leaders
on both sides. We know this wasn’t easy. There is lot of opposition
in Turkey, there is lot opposition in Armenia and yet the leaders
were insightful enough and bold enough to make the case that this is
in their interest and go and sign the protocols. We supported that
process and we applaud their agreement to do so. We would like to
see it move forward. The protocols have been referred to Parliaments
for ratification and obviously they need to be ratified before they
are implemented. If they can be ratified and implemented then this
can lead to open borders, more trade, prosperity and peace among
neighbors. So, that’s why we are so strong, we are supportive of this
process. Now, the Nagorno-Karabakh issue you raised, you are right to
say that Turkish leaders have said that they see the prospects for
ratification dim unless there is progress in Nagorno-Karabakh. We
don’t link the two issues because we think that they are both,
that Turkey-Armenia normalization is important and a good thing
in its own right. It shouldn’t be linked to anything else and we
also support Nagorno- Karabakh settlement because we think it would
benefit both parties and it doesn’t need to be linked to anything
else. So we are actively working as co-chairs of the Minsk group on
the Nagorno-Karabakh solution, regardless of anything else. It would
benefit both sides — that’s a conflict that led to many thousands
of deaths and displaced persons and current tension and closed borders.

So for the same reason we want to promote reconciliation between Turkey
and Armenia we want to promote it between Armenian and Azerbaijan and
Nagorno-Karabakh, to be engaged from that process and it’s difficult if
it wasn’t then it wouldn’t be stuck where it is for so long. But they
are too, the leaders are talking to each other. In any negotiation
people drive hard bargains, but we think that the reality that both
sides would benefit from a settlement gives us some optimism that a
settlement can be reached and that would really be historic progress
for the region if both of those things could move forward in the
near future.

The above excerpt shows that the American diplomat made no radical
statement that was not voiced by official Washington before.

Disseminating unverified reports is the work style of both Azerbaijan
and some Turkish mass media. So, one should not be surprised at such
lack of competence.

IWPR probes Shushi prison concerns

Institute for War & Peace Reporting IWPR, UK
Nov 13 2009

IWPR PROBES SHUSHI PRISON CONCERNS

Prison authorities allow reporter in to check conditions following
claims inmates are mistreated.

By Lusine Musaelyan in Shushi

For over a century, criminals in Nagorny Karabakh have feared the
Shushi fortress, a prison considered one of the toughest in the
Caucasus.

Now, following allegations of mistreatment by ex-prisoners and human
rights groups, the prison administration has allowed this IWPR
reporter behind its walls to see the conditions at first hand.

`The little black cat hasn’t committed a crime, but it’s in prison
too,’ said one of the prisoners in a rare joke. They were only allowed
to speak in the presence of a warder, and normally confined themselves
to praising prison conditions.

Administrators of the fortress, which was established in the 1860s and
was an infamous detention centre for Armenian dissidents in the Soviet
years, refused to say how many men were locked behind its walls,
revealing only that its capacity was 250 and that the inmates were
treated well.

Facilities were basic. In the cell I was allowed to visit there was a
metal bed, covered with a thin bedspread, along with a small cupboard.
An aluminium plate and cup sat on the cupboard, with some fried
potatoes, vegetables and chicken. Judging by the bits of tin foil, and
the fact that inmates are supposed to eat in the cafeteria, this food
appeared to have been provided by relatives.

The cell was decorated with icons, and its floor was of concrete.
Administrators said the prison was always warm, however, despite its
antiquated appearance.

They said the Shushi institution was known in Soviet times as `The Red
Zone’, because inmates were forced to behave well, without any of the
tolerated hierarchies and violence of other prisoners in the Soviet
Union.

Samvel Petrosian, governor of the prison, says the reputation was
deserved and to this day the prisoners were forced to obey only the
regulations.

Human rights groups and former inmates, however, say he was not
telling the whole truth, and that Shushi was as violent a place as
other prisons.

`In this prison, a criminal is not rehabilitated, he is just made more
aggressive and suppressed,’ said Hamo, who spent five years in Shushi
for assault, and asked not to be identified by his surname.

`There the prisoners have to obey the governor’s collaborators. I am
opposed to this, since there is supposed to be law, and normally the
demands of the law and the collaborators were different.’

The state ombudsman of Nagorny Karabakh, which governs itself as an
independent state but is considered to be a rebel part of Azerbaijan
by the United Nations, confirmed that inmates were not treated as they
should be.

`There are definitely violations in the prison,’ Ombudsman Yuri
Hayrapetian said. He wrote in the summer that regulations had been
changed to give prisoners the right to use a telephone, but there is
still no way for them to talk to the outside world.

Prisoners are also obliged to work for the jail ` this journalist saw
one working in the garden, some making furniture, one fetching tea and
one cleaning the courtyard ` despite a law stating that they cannot be
employed without payment.

Other facilities laid on for the prisoners also seemed minimal. A
computer class had just two dusty computers, which did not appear to
have been used for some time. A library also looked abandoned and had
few books.

Petrosian, the prisoner governor, said IWPR could talk to an inmate
but only in his presence and in his office. He chose Raphael
Tadevosian, a 21-year-old from the Armenian town of Hrazdan, as a
suitable interviewee.

`The administration helps us, and I am very grateful for this,’ he
said, but required prompting from Petrosian to say anything else.

`Tell about the food, and about how you don’t go hungry,’ ordered the governor.

`We eat meat as a starter and main course six days a week. For
breakfast, we are given porridge, fish, bread. They feed us well,’ the
young man said quickly, in words echoed by two other prisoners.

`We will not return here,’ said one of them, who did not want to give
his name. `But we approve of the demands made on us. I shave, I eat
well, I am not oppressed.’

According to Karabakh law, prisoners’ food should cost 1,000 dram
(about three US dollars) a day, which is sufficient to buy bread,
buckwheat, pasta, oil, sugar, vegetables, meat, fish, tea and juice.

The administrators say they receive all of this, but also said some
inmates had become so accustomed to prison life that they could not
survive on the outside and would commit crimes so as to return when
let out.

Lusine Musaelyan is a reporter for Radio Liberty in Stepanakert, and a
member of IWPR’s Cross Caucasus Journalism Network.