Celebration In Honor Of Armenian Olympians Held In Yerevan

CELEBRATION IN HONOR OF ARMENIAN OLYMPIANS HELD IN YEREVAN

Noyan Tapan

Au g 27, 2008

YEREVAN, AUGUST 27, NOYAN TAPAN. A celebration in honor of the
Armenian Olympians took place in Yerevan’s Republic Square on the
evening of August 26. The event started with performance of the
hymn of the National Olympic Committee of Armenia (NOCA). Then the
members of Armenia’s Olympic team, 6 bronze medalists, the coaches,
Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan, NOCA President Gagik Tsarukian
and the RA Minister of Sport and Youth Issues Armen Grigorian mounted
the platform.

In his speech Serzh Sargsyan congratulated the sportsmen, coaches and
all those who made a contribution to the success of the Armenian team
at the Beijing Olympic Games. NOCA President also made a speech, in
which he thanked the chief coaches of the weightlifting, Greco-Roman
wrestling and boxing teams Ashot Mkhitarian, Levon Julfalakian
and Rafik Mehrabian, as well as the sportsmen who have won bronze
medals. G. Tsarukian expressed a hope that at the next Summer Olympic
Games to be held in London in 2012, our Olympic team will be composed
of more sportsmen and they will win gold and silver medals as well.

Weighlifter Tigran V. Martirosian made a speech on behalf of the
sportsmen.

Then cultural workers gave a performance. The event was concluded
with fireworks.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=116751

An Armenian Gravestone Discovered

AN ARMENIAN GRAVESTONE DISCOVERED

AZG Armenian Daily
28/08/2008

Historical

An Armenian gravestone of historical importance is discovered in
Hamadan (Iran). It has come to our days from the epoch of the monarchy
of the Iranian Shah Mohammadali and the Constitutional movement May
6, 1912.

According to Tehran "Alik" newspaper, the gravestone is 104 cm in
length, 58 cm in width, and there is a writing on it consisting of
11 lines. The writing belongs to the Armenian martyr Trdat Chijian.

The gravestone is discovered near the Armenian Church St. Stepanos
in Hamadan by the Iranian Culture Heritage organization.

There is a cross on the upper part of the gravestone, on the left
side of it a rifle is carved and on the right – a pistol.

Taking into account that the date of the gravestone coincides with
the date of the martyrdom of the national revolutionary Eprem Khan,
it is supposed that the gravestone belongs to the one of the 12
Armenian volunteers of the group of Eprem Khan, who participated in
the capture of the castle of Surji village, 70 km far from Hamadan,
"Noyan Tapan" reported.

Small Nations Should Not Interfere In Conflicts Between World Powers

SMALL NATIONS SHOULD NOT INTERFERE IN CONFLICTS BETWEEN WORLD POWERS

Interfax News Agency
Aug 25 2008
Russia

Small Caucasian nations should try hard to smooth over contradictions
between world powers that occur in their region, Armenian President
Serzh Sargsyan said in an interview with the Austrian newspaper
Der Standard.

A key provision of our recent policy is that small nations located in
the highly sensitive region should do their best to minimize possible
confrontations between super powers instead of inflating them, he said.

It is very easy for any region to get short-time benefits from
contradictions between world powers that occur from time to time,
he said. However, it is much more difficult and useful to cooperate
impartially in the sphere of common interests.

Bearing in mind the challenges we have to withstand, it would be
senseless to create new division lines and artificial ideological
groups, he said.

Attempted armed resistance to the self-determination ambitions in
South Caucasian nations is fraught with major military and geopolitical
consequences, the president said.

The latest events clearly showed the real danger presented by the
arms race, unfounded enlargement of military budgets and militant
declarations in the South Caucasus. They also showed that such
conflicts should be settled through the free expression of will by
the people seeking self-determination. Otherwise, ethnic cleansing
and breach of international humanitarian laws would be unavoidable,
he said.

Strategic partnership with Russia has never impeded Armenia’s normal
and effective cooperation with regional and non-regional countries
and international organizations. This is proven by the vast amount
of joint programs with the EU and NATO and the dynamic relations with
European states, the U.S. and Iran, Sargsyan said.

Asked whether the Russian dominance in the South Caucasus was
beneficial for Armenia, which housed a key Russian military base,
Sargsyan said, I think that in our times military bases are symbols
of efficient cooperation rather than of dominance.

Efficient sovereignty is important for Armenia, the same as for any
other state. The modern notion of sovereignty implies involvement in
international and regional security systems, he said.

Special Investigation Service Of Armenia Completes Investigation In

SPECIAL INVESTIGATION SERVICE OF ARMENIA COMPLETES INVESTIGATION IN CRIMINAL CASE AGAINST FORMER SOLICITOR GENERAL GAGIK JHANGIRYN

ArmInfo
2008-08-22 11:00:00

ArmInfo. Special Investigation Service of Armenia has completed the
investigation in the criminal case against former solicitor general
Gagik Jhangiryan.

The criminal case was submitted to the court Friday. He is charged
with Article 316.1 of Armenian Cirminal Code (violent treatment to
police officer). The former deputy prosecutor general of Armenia
Gagik Jangiryan and his brother Vardan Jangiryan were detained on
Feb 23 late in the evening.

As press-service of the Armenian Police reports, Main Department for
fighting Organized Crime [MDFOC] received the real-time information
that the persons in the motors black BMWx5 number 99 SL555 and silver
‘VAZ 21010’ number 80 UU 555 are armed and are going to destabilize
the situation in the capital city. On 23 February, at 23:00 PM,
near the Argavand cross-road the MDFOC stopped the above mentioned
motors but the persons in them showed resistance. The MDFOC employee
Rafik Muradyan carelessly started shooting from his government-issue
weapon and injured Vardan Jangiryan and two MDFOC employees Gevorg
Malkhasyan and Tigran Karapetyan. The former deputy prosecutor general
Gagik Jangiryan, Vardan Jangiryan, Karen Hovanesyan and Leva Pogosyan
were detained. Gagik Jangiryan toted a Czech gun charged with 14
pistols and Vardan Jangiryan – PSM type gun charged with 8 pistols,
Karen Hovanesyan – "Makarov" type gun changed with 8 pistols and a
spare charger with 8 pistols. When searching of the motor "Browning"
type gun changed with 14 pistols, a hanger, ristbands and armoured
jacket were found.

Diplomats Are Judging Over The Counteraction In The South Ossetia

DIPLOMATS ARE JUDGING OVER THE COUNTERACTION IN THE SOUTH OSSETIA

armradio.am
22.08.2008 17:16

"The South Ossetian counteraction and the counteraction between Russia
and Georgia showed that Georgia is very far from participation in the
NATO", Armenian diplomat leaving in America Richard Kirakosyan thinks.

According to him Georgia with its counteractions is not able to
participate in the organization yet. "I think that America stands
for the military stability in the region and not for such a false
man like Michail Saakashvili is. Analyzing the last events in the
South Ossetia the diplomat says that they will have two important
influences on Armenia. "The first is the negative influence on the
transport communication of Armenia; the second is the fact that
Georgian counteraction has postponed the development of NATO in the
region", the diplomat said. Diplomat from Russia Andranik Mihrannyan
says that Armenia and Russia are strategic collaborators, but NATO –
Russia relations can not have direct influence on Armenia.

"It is fact that the last events were profitable for Armenia to show
the world that interethnic problems must not be solved by military
actions", Mihrannyan said. As for Richard Kirakosyan, he thinks that
Armenia must take measures to provide the security of NKR. Diplomat
Alexander Iskandaryan from Armenia is agree with Mihranyan: "The
decision of NATO against Russian=2 0was clear, but we must not
overestimate its results", Iskandaryan says and adds that Russia was
ready to all this or it wouldn’t do so as he did in August 7.

Abdallah Gul Supports Armenia’s Membership In Stability And Partners

ABDULLAH GUL SUPPORTS ARMENIA’S MEMBERSHIP IN STABILITY AND PARTNERSHIP PLATFORM OF CAUCASUS ORGANIZATION
By. H. Chaqrian

AZG Armenian Daily
23/08/2008

Armenia-Turkey

Foreign Ministry of Turkey Orders to Minister for Sports to attend
the Football Game in Yerevan

Prime Minister of Turkey Erdogan made his first official statement
about the Partnership Platform of Caucasus organization initiative
on Auguts, then took measures to popularize it during his visits to
Moscow, Tbilisi and Baku. He suggested Russia, Georgia and Azerbaijan
to join the organization and emphasized the importance of Armenia’s
participation in it.

Georgia and Azerbaijan gladly accepted the offer, while Russia
approached it with certain awareness. First of all the idea was
not seriously accepted by Russian diplomats, and secondly they were
aware of the United States standing behind the initiative. However,
after the official Washington opposed the idea of establishing another
political structure in the region, Russia revised its positions and
expressed willingness to support the new union under the condition
of having the leading role in it.

The Turkish public is not certain about the Stability and Partnership
Platform of Caucasus, moreover about Armenia’s membership. Therefore
serious debate started in Turkey regarding the reality of the idea
in general and the issues of Armenia’s membership in the future
organization.

Professor of Marmara University Busra Ersanli, as repored in August 21
Bianet release, said that there is no proper background for creation
of such a union, taking into account the deep controversies between
Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan. The professor also noted that
Russia will not bear being an outsider in the organization, and,
although welcoming the idea today, Russia will never permit a NATO
or USA-oriented structure in the territories of its vital interest.

Eni Cag, commenting upon this initiative, cited the statement of
National Movement Party Vice-President Aktay Vural, who said, "Let
Armenia stop the occupation of Karabakh and resign the groundless
claims about the Genocide. Turkey must not be ensnared with fake ideas,
for matters of stability and peace, Armenia must give up the policy
of enmity against Ankara and Baku".

Head of MotherlandParty Ugur Mumcun added, "the controversies with
Armenia are not of emotional matter. There are serious claims of
territories, and it is ridiculous to make an alliance with that
country".

In the same release Eni Cag qualified the debatable initiative
of Erdogan as a task from the EU. However, the idea was welcomed
by Russia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, in this way or that. Erdogan,
as reported by Radikal, ordered Foreign Minister Ali Babacan to
start talks with Yerevan regarding the Stability and Partnership
Platform of Caucasus initiative. Babacan is also to ask Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to become a mediator in the expected
Armenia-Turkey talks.

As far as it is known, the negotiations are to be started in September
after the UN General Assembly Session, in case the Babacan-Lavrov
meeting has positive results.

The idea of inviting Armenia to the Stability and Partnership Platform
of Caucasus was also approved by President of Turkey Abdullah Gul. He
said that first of all Armenia is to be invited because of being a
Southern Caucasian states and secondly, in his opinion, Armenia’s
membership will help to settle the controversies with Turkey.

But the anxiety of the Turkish authorities is not only about
the Stability and Partnership Platform of Caucasus. The question
of Abdullah Gul’s attendance to the Armenia-Turkey game remains
unresolved.

In connection with this matter the Government of Turkey sent the
following message to the President’s administartion, "Although
President Abdullah Gul’s visit shall have a great importance and
positive consequences, the Armenian side has not made yet the gesture
necessary to make the visit real. Therefore, the most reasonable
neutral move is to send Sports Minister Murad Baseskioglu to watch
the game".

ANKARA: Internet Bans Pit Turkey Against Freedom Of Speech

INTERNET BANS PIT TURKEY AGAINST FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Today’s Zaman
Aug 23 2008
Turkey

There are currently 853 Web sites banned in Turkey, including
video-sharing site YouTube and dailymotion.com, placing Turkey in
the league of countries such as China and Saudi Arabia, famous for
restricting freedom of speech.

Web sites are most often banned on grounds that they insult the founder
of the Turkish Republic, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, contain vulgarity,
enable gambling or promote suicide. Many sites have also been banned
for crimes covered under the Internet Security Law. But a number of
sites are banned for no apparent reason. The latest Web site to be
banned was gundemonline.com, which was blocked by Ankara’s 11th High
Criminal Court without any justification.

Other countries known to frequently ban Web sites include China,
Iran, Armenia, Tunisia, Indonesia, Syria, the United Arab Emirates
and Saudi Arabia.

Sites protest bans

A campaign has been initiated by elmaaltshift.com to protest these
bans. To date 441 Web sites — including some of the most popular sites
in the country, such as online English-Turkish dictionary zargan.com,
sinema.com and forzabesiktas.com — are supporting the campaign.

Earlier this week the sites supporting the campaign "banned" themselves
by putting up front pages that read "Access is denied," in imitation
of what happens when sites are blocked by courts.

Getting around the bans

The bans have increased the popularity of Web sites, such as
ktunnel.com and its rival, vtunnel.com, that allow Turkish users to
access banned sites. According to data from Web information company
alexa.com, ktunnel.com currently ranks 37th on the list of most-visited
sites in Turkey, while vtunnel.com is at the 41st spot.

Data at alexa.com also shows that despite the ongoing ban, YouTube
ranks 17th on the list of popular Web sites in Turkey, showing that
Turkish Internet users still find other ways to access the site.

War In South Ossetia Seen From Central Asia

WAR IN SOUTH OSSETIA SEEN FROM CENTRAL ASIA
Aleksandr Shustov

2 1.08.2008

The "five-day war" in South Ossetia during which the Georgian forces
were quickly routed by the Russian 58th Army came as a shock to the
post-Soviet Republics. Though the Russian leadership reiterated in
the past that a military scenario was likely, nobody expected Moscow’s
reaction to be so immediate and so harsh. Moscow’s using military force
against a post-Soviet Republic – for the first time since the split of
the USSR – created a difficult situation for the CIS countries many of
which also have unresolved territorial disputes with their neighbors.

Central Asian countries, which are often geopolitically bracketed with
the South Caucasus, are of particular interest in this context. The
analogies between Central Asia and the Caucasus have been described
thoroughly by Z. Brzezinski in his The Grand Chessboard. The
key features common to the two regions are the mixture of ethnic
territories, the absence of generally recognized country borders
identical to those of ethnic areals, and the incomplete character
of statehood in most countries. All of the above led Z. Brzezinski
to describe Central Asia and the Caucasus as the Eurasian Balkans,
the region US strategists are eyeing now that the US dominance over
the Balkans is an accomplished fact.

Central Asian countries can be divided in two gro ups depending on
their response to the conflict in South Ossetia. Whereas Kazakhstan
and Kyrgyzstan have formulated their positions on the issue with
relative clarity, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan simply
expressed no reaction to the conflict. Moreover, for quite some time
the tightly controlled Uzbek and Turkmen media gave no indications
that there was a war in South Ossetia or that the Abkhazian forces
were muscling Georgian troops out of the Kodori Gorge.

The war in South Ossetia was not reported in any of the Uzbek papers
during its decisive phase, nor was it reflected by the sites of
the country’s news agencies. Only the Uzbek Vecherniy Tashkent paper
published two brief notes, one telling that an aircraft of the Russian
Ministry of the Emergency Situations carrying humanitarian aid landed
in Vladikavkaz and that Russian Prime Minister V. Putin arrived in
the city, another – that urgent sessions of the UN Security Council
and the NATO Council were held, but it left its readership oblivious
of the causes of the developments. Besides, one short report on the
fighting in Tskhinvali was shown by the Uzbek TV using the footage
borrowed from the Russian television.

The Turkmen media responded to the war in the Caucasus with total
silence.

The national television continued to broadcast 30-minite readings
of Ruhnama (the "spiritual guidance of the nation" written by late
Turkmen President S. Niyazov) and inf ormed the public that a panda
was born in a zoo in China. Satellite TV served as the only source
of information on the Caucasus war for the population of Turkmenistan.

Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan reacted much more actively. Kazakh President
N. Nazarbayev who attended the Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing on
the first day of the war was the first to speak on the occasion. It
was during a meeting with Nazarbayev that V. Putin made a harsh
statement that Georgia would get an adequate response to its attack
on Tskhinvali. Nazarbayev replied in a neutrally positive tone. He
said that the peacekeeping mission had a UN mandate, Georgia acted in
a wrong way, it did not warn about the coming escalation, and there
could be no alternative to a peaceful resolution of the problem.

The Kazakh President’s reaction voiced on August 13 at a meeting
with his Kyrgyz counterpart K. Bakiyev was also generally
pro-Russian. Commenting on what was going on in the Caucasus he
said that the territorial integrity principle was recognized by the
entire international community and that documents adopted by the CIS
condemned separatism, but complex inter-ethnic issues still must be
resolved peacefully via negotiations, not militarily.

The position of Kyrgyzstan which currently presides over the CIS
was rather neutral. Bakiyev opined that according to the norms of
the international law the real path to the resolution of the dispute
between th e Georgian and the South Ossetian sides lay in the political
plane. Thus, the Kazakh and Kyrgyz Presidents condemned Georgia’s
military offensive but refrained from distinctly positive or negative
appraisals of the military operation launched by the Russian army.

To an extent, the lack of official reactions from most CIS countries
was offset by the statement made by the Parliamentary Assembly of the
Collective Security Treaty Organization. Along with Russia, Belarus,
and Armenia, this organization comprises four of the five Central Asian
Countries – Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. The
Collective Security Treaty Organization practically echoed Moscow’s
position in a statement which read: "On the pretext of restoring
its territorial integrity, Georgia in effect carried out acts of
genocide against the Ossetian people, leading to a humanitarian
disaster. Tbilisi’s military campaign, which thwarted the budding
political dialogue between the parties, destroyed prospects for a
peaceful conflict resolution."

Having close economic and political ties with the West Central Asian
countries are explainably reluctant to complicate their relations with
Western countries by openly siding with Russia. There is yet another
key factor behind their restraint in commenting on the "five-day war".

The theme of the "territorial integrity" has been invoked in
all statements made by the Kazakh and Kyrgyz Presidents f or a
serious reason. Realizing that the chances of Russia’s recognizing
the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia and subsequently
incorporating them have increased enormously, Central Asian countries
are concerned that similar scenarios affecting their territories are
possible and hence adopt a cautious stance.

It is of interest to review the assessments of the "five-day war" by
Central Asian experts. For example, Kyrgyz political analyst M. Sariev
regards the events in the Caucasus not as a conflict between Georgia
and South Ossetia but as one between Russia and the US. He expects
Kyrgyzstan to face toughly formulated questions concerning the future
of the Gansi US airbase in its territory at the coming meeting of the
Shanghai Cooperation Organization. In Sariev’s view, as the Collective
Security Treaty Organization member the country is going to align
itself with Russia since the same events as in Georgia can take place
in Kyrgyzstan – this is Russia’s sphere of interests and Russia is
not going to stop. Explaining the motivation underlying his position,
Sariev says: "We should be aware that we are in the same culturally
Eurasian areal with Russia". M. Suyunbaev, another Kyrgyz political
analyst, points quite reasonably to the fact that the "five-day
war" is a product of the "Kosovo process" which the West has set in
motion totally ignoring Russia’s position. If the proce ss evolves,
it will quite likely affect Central Asia, for example Tajikistan or
Karakalpakstan whose histories, in the expert’s opinion, are similar to
those of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Analyzing the potential results
of Georgia’s leaving the CIS, he notes that the consequences for
Georgia are going to be extremely negative as complication can arise
for the workforce migration from Georgia to Russia and for the trade
between the two countries. Suyunbaev’s forecast includes not only
the intensification of the struggle over the existing US military
base in Kyrgyzstan but also greater efforts aimed at creating new
military bases in the southern part of the Republic.

On the whole, there is a consensus among Kyrgyz experts that the
rivalry between Russia and the US over Central Asia is bound to
escalate, and that Russia’s resolute defense of South Ossetia shows
that for Central Asian countries a totally pro-Western orientation
can entail highly undesirable consequences.

http://en.fondsk.ru/article.php?id=1565

Salmon Armenians On Rare Earth Run

SALMON ARMENIANS ON RARE EARTH RUN

Vernon Morning Star
Aug 21 2008
Canada

Published: August 21, 2008 6:00 PM When the Salmon Armenians were
nominated for the Okanagan Music Awards Best Blues Band of 2007,
the eight-member group decided maybe they should have a blues song
in their repertoire.

"We thought, ‘What is there to be blue about living in the Okanagan
and playing in the summer?’" recalled band founder Lody Kieken, who
says that question turned into the inspiration for the song guitarist
Mike Hilliard wrote: Ain’t My Time To Have The Blues.

The classic rhythm and blues band was taken aback to be even included
in the OMA category, never mind win it, said Kieken. "We were quite
surprised."

Easier to explain, said Kieken, is the reason why the Salmon Armenians’
music is sought-after throughout the Okanagan and Shuswap.

"I think we have a lot of fun on stage and it shows," said Kieken,
on what is a working musician’s weekend: Monday morning. The band has
had a steady stream of gigs this summer and next week they’ll cap it
off with a performance at the Rare Earth Jazz and Blues Fest.

"Our music appeals to a wide range. Kids have fun with it and adults
have fun with it and seniors have fun with it," said Kieken, who plays
the organ and keyboard as well as sings in the Salmon Armenians. He
formed the band in 1997 because he couldn’t find another rhythm and
blues group to play with.

"Mostly I wanted to have a chance to play in a band with live horn
players, so that was the motivation for me," said Kieken, who has
kept the Salmon Armenians afloat despite a changing membership.

"The group has been together 12 years, so we’ve gone through up to
50 musicians, but the core of the band has been together three years."

The Salmon Armenians is now made up of Rich Thorne (trombone),
Mike Scharf (saxophone), Doug Sonju (saxophone), Murray Holmes
(bass guitar), Larry Keats (drums) and Sabrina Weeks (lead vocals),
in addition to Hilliard and Kieken.

Right now the band is in the process of recording an album of
entirely original material. But because the members are spread out
(from Penticton to Salmon Arm), and they’re not in a rush, Kieken
has stopped giving out an estimated time of arrival.

"When it’s done, it’s done," he said.

For now, they’re looking forward to their live gigs, including Rare
Earth, for several reasons. "Just the opportunity to see the new
festival get off the ground and mingle with other artists, that’s
one of the fun things about playing a festival," said Kieken.

The Salmon Armenians perform Aug. 30 at 1:40 p.m. at the Rare Earth
Jazz and Blues Fest, taking place at the Kin Race Track. Day passes
are $40 for adults, available through Ticket Seller. Children 12 and
under are free.

Bloody Divisions Stalking Multi-Ethnic Caucasus Region

BLOODY DIVISIONS STALKING MULTI-ETHNIC CAUCASUS REGION
By Sebastian Smith

China Post
Aug 20 2008
Taiwan

MOSCOW — In the Caucasus, even the mountains seem unable to escape the
region’s bloody feuds. Legend tells that the twin summits of Elbrus,
a 5,642-meter (18,510-foot) colossus at the Russian-Georgian border,
are the cleaved skull of an ancient giant.

Elbrus, the tale goes, was attacked by his son Mount Beshtau in an
argument over a local beauty, Mount Mashuk. Her tears now form one
of southern Russia’s most celebrated mineral springs.

The exotic story captures the real life complexity of the Caucasus —
and the way fallings out here quickly turn bloody.

Today the world’s focus is on Russia’s attack against Georgia
in response to a Georgian assault on a separatist enclave of
ethnic-Ossetians.

But the Ossetians are just one of more than 50 tiny ethnic groups
in this beautiful region, each speaking a separate language, each
fiercely protective of ancestral lands.

"The Caucasus has the typical complications of a mountain region,
where people from different ethnicities live in isolation from each
other," says Alexander Cherkasov, an expert on the region with the
Memorial human rights group.

The amazing ethnic patchwork of Papua New Guinea and the clan system
of highland Scotland bear similarities, Cherkasov points out.

Add the post-Soviet legacy of corruption, brutality, and floods of
weaponry, and you have the Caucasus.

Other than the fighting over South Ossetia in Georgia, there are bloody
conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh, the Georgian separatist province of
Abkhazia, and the quagmire of Chechnya, where an estimated 100,000
people have lost their lives in a failed independence bid from Russia.

And yet Caucasian peoples are often able to live in harmony.

Despite today’s horrors, many Georgians and Ossetians are related
through marriage. In Abkhazia, where thousands have died since the
1990s, the ethnic-Abkhaz separatist leader himself is married to
a Georgian.

Even Dagestan, a remarkable district on the Russian side of the
mountains, with more than 30 distinct ethnic groups, has little
history of inter-communal fighting.

The trouble, analysts say, comes when outsiders deliberately stir the
pot. Russians have long been masters at this, strengthening their
dominance by setting different ethnic groups against each other,
said Sergei Arutunov, a researcher at the Russian Academy of Sciences.

"Every empire from the Romans on has marched under the idea of ‘divide
and conquer,’" he said. "That’s how it’s been here and always will be."

In the 19th century, the tsars used an alliance with the strategically
placed Ossetians to derail anti-Russian resistance leader Imam Shamil’s
attempts to unite the northern Caucasus tribes.

The main Ossetian town, which controls two key mountain passes between
Russia and Georgia, was named Vladikavkaz — literally "ruler of
the Caucasus."

Stalin took the divide and rule concept to extremes, splitting
related groups into different administrative districts and using
forced resettlement to transform the ethnic balance.

Decades on, the effects of Stalin’s machinations keep tearing at the
Caucasus, whether in the Abkhaz struggle for independence to the south,
or a vicious dispute between Ossetians and their Ingush neighbors to
the north.

And Grigory Shvedov, editor of Caucasian Knot, a specialist Internet
site, says the Kremlin still relies on divide and rule, regardless
of the subsequent suffering.

But he also blames local leaders, like Georgia’s first president,
Zviad Gamsakhurdia, an ultra-nationalist who in the early 1990s fueled
hatred between Georgians and their Ossetian and Abkhaz neighbors,
with disastrous results.

"These are conflicts were started artificially, rather than based on
real ethnic feelings," Shvedov said. "Politicians play a big role in
stirring this up."

Arutunov said the dangers of nationalism are well understood in the
Caucasus, but that young hotheads are easily seduced by the rhetoric.

"I hope the wise will prevail," Arutunov said. "They must. Otherwise
they will all slaughter each other and the Caucasus will end up
a desert."