Hayastan All Armenian Fund announces financial support to families of 5,564 militia-members in Artsakh

Save

Share

 16:25, 9 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 9, ARMENPRESS. The Hayastan All-Armenian Fund announced that it will provide financial support to the families of 5,564 volunteers who signed up to serve in the militia of the Defense Army during the 2020 war.

“The social issue of the people of Artsakh remains a priority for the Hayastan All Armenian Fund”, the organization said.

“This social assistance program will support the families of servicemen and alleviate their immediate post war challenges by providing 1 billion 112 million 800 thousand AMD, approximately USD 2.1million.”

Hayastan All-Armenian Fund said it will continue supporting veterans with various programs to help in returning to civilian life.

Editing by Stepan Kocharyan

Charges brought against opposition leader Vazgen Manukyan

Public Radio of Armenia
March 3 2021

Charges have been brought against Vazgen Manukyan, the joint candidate for Prime Minister of the opposition Homeland Salvation Movement, under Article 301 of the RA Criminal Code (public calls aimed at seizing power, violating territorial integrity or forcibly overthrowing the constitutional order), Rima Yeganyan, head of the information and public relations department of the RA Investigative Committee, told Armenpress.

“During rallies in Freedom Square on February 12 and 20, 2021 Vazgen Manukyan made public calls for seizure of power and forcible change of the constitutional system. In this connection, a decision was made to indict Manukyan under article 301 of Armenia’s Criminal Code,” she said.

In accordance with the RA Criminal Procedure Code, Vazgen Manukyan has been notified about the need to appear before the body conducting the interrogation on March 4.

Protests against Armenian, Artsakh leaders held in Stepanakert

Panorama, Armenia
Feb 26 2021

Protests demanding Armenian Prime Minster Nikol Pashinyan’s resignation were also staged in Stepanakert, Artsakh’s capital, on Friday.

In addition to “Nikol the traitor!”, the protesters chanted slogans against Artsakh President Arayik Harutyunyan, calling him a “traitor”.

Demonstrators voiced support for the General Staff of the Armenian military, which demanded Pashinyan’s and his cabinet’s resignation in a statement on Thursday morning.

The statement sparked widespread protests against the premier in central Yerevan yesterday. Some of the protesters spent the night on Baghramyan Avenue outside the National Assembly.

The Artsakh political forces also reacted to the ongoing developments in Armenia, with three parties expressing their unconditional support to the army’s top brass.

Civil disobedience actions are expected in Stepanakert today as well. 

Edgar Ghazaryan: Relatives of war victims should demand answers from person responsible for situation at Feb. 20 rally

Panorama, Armenia
Feb 17 2021

Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, former Chief of Staff of Armenia’s Constitutional Court Edgar Ghazaryan states that every Armenian citizen who was at Yerevan’s Republic Square during the anti-government protests on 23 April 2018, must also join the nationwide rally in the Armenian capital on February 20 to demand Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan's resignation.

"Unfortunately, there may have been people among them who were killed in the [recent Artsakh] war. All their relatives should come and, in my opinion, demand answers from the person who is responsible for the current situation," Ghazaryan told a news conference on Wednesday.

According to him, people must find inner strength, overcome severe stress and restore rule of law in Armenia.

"The power in Armenia belongs to the people. In the history of Armenia, there should not be even one ruler whose will, wishes and influence on the people have bigger role than the opposite," he said.

The rally organized by the Homeland Salvation Movement will be held at Liberty Square on February 20, at 3pm.

Protesters revive demands for Armenian government to resign

Republic World
Feb 21 2021
Written By

Associated Press Television News 

YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) — Thousands of protesters calling for the resignation of Armenia’s prime minister and his government gathered in the center of the country’s capital on Saturday.

The protesters met on Freedom Square and marched off in several directions, shutting down traffic in central Yerevan. They then , then reconvened on Republic Square outside the government headquarters.

Several rows of police blocked off the government building. There were no immediate reports of clashes.

The demonstration revives a wave of protests against Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan that arose in November after he signed a ceasefire with Azerbaijan that ceded territory occupied by Armenian forces. The deal ended a six-week war over the separatist Nagorno-Karabakhin territory in which thousands died.

The anti-government protests in Armenia had gone dormant in the depth of winter. Demonstrators voiced objections Saturday not only to the cease-fire agreement, but cited deteriorating economic conditions and corruption in the country.

(Disclaimer: This story has not been edited by www.republicworld.com and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Nikol Pashinyan will fail to silence free speech – Media Advocate

Panorama, Armenia
Feb 20 2021

Nikol Pashinyan’s government is trying to silence public discontent, Media Advocate initiative said in a statement on Saturday, following the detention of several Armenian opposition figures. The full text of the statement is below. 

"Karen Bekaryan, co-owner of Qaryak Media media holding, was arrested based on a contrived and a false accusation. Along with him, the National Security Service (NSS) detained expert in Azerbaijani studies Anzhela Elibegova, lawyer Gohar Meloyan and others who actively represent their standpoints on social networks. Searches were carried out without a court decision, lawyers were not allowed to communicate with their clients for a long time, all the processes were carried out with unprecedented violations of the law.

This is yet another step against freedom of speech within the framework of the current campaign launched by the authorities. At the present stage, this was preceded by a ban on citing anonymous sources for the media, which contradicts both the Armenian legislation and our international obligations. E- draft.am (Unified website for publication of legal acts’ drafts) has posted a new law on insulting or slandering a person in public service at the suggestion of the Prosecutor’s Office, which envisages imprisonment in addition to հօrrible fines.

The government of Nikol Pashinyan, which has declared itself the standard of democracy, allows itself such laws and actions that even the most authoritarian states would not have similar impudence towards the international community. He is convinced that the majority of the National Assembly, obedient to him, will pass these laws without any questions.

Instead of explaining the disgraceful defeat in the war, the death of 5,000 young soldiers, the loss of 10,000 square kilometers, and eliminating its consequences, Nikol Pashinyan’s government is trying to silence public discontent by threatening with fines and arrests.

The active society and especially the journalistic community are obliged to resist the arbitrariness of the authorities and hold them accountable for such manifestations, as well as to show that Nikol Pashinyan’s government is obliged to take responsibility for the heaviest losses and capitulation suffered in the war.

Nikol Pashinyan will fail to silence free speech.

Freedom for political prisoners."

https://www.panorama.am/en/news/2021/02/20/Media-Advocate/2455225

Pakistan’s Military Involvement In The Nagorno-Karabakh War

MEMRI
Feb 9 2021
February 9, 2021 By Tufail Ahmad

On October 2, 2020, the government of Pakistan sought to deny media reports that Pakistani soldiers were aiding the Azeri military against Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh war (September 27-November 10, 2020). The Pakistani newspapers of the next morning, October 3, quoted Zahid Hafeez Chaudri, the spokesman of the Foreign Office in Islamabad, as saying that such media reports were "speculative and baseless" and "irresponsible."[1]

After this official denial of involvement, Pakistani journalists came under increased pressure not to write about the Pakistani military's role in the Nagorno-Karabakh war. In this paper, I will examine the Pakistani view of Pakistan's role in this war in which Azerbaijan defeated Armenia with the military help of Turkey and Pakistan. The Nagorno-Karabakh is a region where about 1,000 mujahideen from Afghanistan went to fight in the early years of the 1990s, according to the Pakistani media.[2]

This regional war of 2020, carried out when the international community's attention was consumed by the Coronavirus outbreak, is a key part of an emerging trilateral alliance in this region. Recently, MEMRI has published a series of research papers on this subject, notably: "A New Alliance Rising In The East – Turkey, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, China – And Its Enemies – The U.S. and India;"[3] and "Under The Emerging Turkey-Pakistan Strategic Alliance, Pakistan May Provide Turkey With Nuclear Weapons Capabilities."[4]


Pakistani, Turkish, and Azeri flags on a wall in Karabakh after capture by Azerbaijan.[5]

On October 1, a day before Pakistan's denial, the Urdu-language daily Roznama Ummat wrote: "After the beginning of the war between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Pakistan and Turkey are siding with the brother-Islamic country of Azerbaijan."[6] Noting that Turkey is "openly" aiding Azerbaijan, the daily wrote further: "Being a close ally [of Turkey] and a Muslim country, Pakistan has also announced clearly support for Azerbaijan."[7]

Syed Ali Haider, a senior journalist and host with Pakistan's leading TV channel Samaa, posted a video about Pakistan's role in the Nagorno-Karabakh war on YouTube which was highlighted in Urdu as "Pakistani air force ki tarbiyat kaam dikha gayi" – i.e., "Pakistani air force's training worked" wonders against Armenia.[8] The video includes a clip of a MiG fighter jet flown by a young Azeri pilot who later died fighting Armenia and whom Haider celebrates as a "martyr," recommending that Azerbaijan honor him with their highest military award.[9]

However, the video's primary purpose is to celebrate the Pakistan air force's role in training Azeri pilots during the war. The clip included in the video could not have been obtained without access to the Pakistani military. In English, the YouTube video is titled: "Pakistan's training to Azerbaijani Pilots."[10] Haider's video, which does not appear to have been telecast on his Samaa television channel, was posted to YouTube five days after Pakistan's official denial.

Haider had also posted, two days after Pakistan's official denial, another video on YouTube. In this video, Haider sought to find out "the reason for Azeris' love for Pakistan, which they have begun to express clearly for the past few days."[11] He says: "One big important thing they have done is this: in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, where these days tourism has begun walking, Pakistanis have started going in large numbers there in Baku, and tourism there is cheap, and visas for Pakistanis arrive stamped just in days, there is a large number of Pakistanis going there; and Allah willing, even I intend to go there once the clouds of war stop…"[12]

Haider's video was posted on October 2, and the preceding nine to ten months saw lockdowns and international travel restrictions across the world due to the Coronavirus pandemic. So, it is surprising how large numbers of Pakistanis were visiting Azerbaijan in the period before October 2020 and after, unless of course they had official authorization from the government of Pakistan, most likely from the Pakistani military. This is process of Pakistanis visiting Azerbaijan in significant numbers seems, as discussed below, to have begun much before the Nagorno-Karabakh war began on September 27, 2020.

So, how was Baku for Pakistanis? Haider asks and responds: "Viewers, the Azeris there had hung flags of Pakistan and Turkey on their buildings, their residences, their offices. You see, at this time, Azeris are in a state of war, there is a conflict with Armenia, a war is underway formally. Armenia has, for several decades… occupied 30 percent of Azerbaijan's territory, their people are getting killed in war, they too are hurt; but think, in such a situation, what would have been the need for Azeris to raise the flags of Turkey and Pakistan on their buildings, to unfurl Pakistan's flag in their homes?"

The television journalist answers: "Pakistan must have done something. Friends, I will tell you what Pakistan has done for Azeris, not only Pakistan as a state, but that you Pakistanis have done something too I will tell you for which all Azeris are thankful."[13] After these introductory remarks, Haider discusses the background to the Azerbaijan-Armenia conflict and why the war is underway. Noting that Pakistan has always supported Azerbaijan, he begins to draw a parallel with the Kashmir situation.

"Friends, if Azerbaijan can wrest its share [of territory] from Armenia, a stronger power than itself, by military muscle, by fighting, which we call by sword, which we call by the strength of arms, here I am not endorsing a war, but Pakistan too should not be afraid of India. If Azerbaijan can make Armenia eat chickpeas through the nose, then Pakistan's army is many times better than that of Azerbaijan [to do this to India in Kashmir]," he says.[14] Toward the conclusion, Haider adds: "Viewers, this is such a war in which, even unwillingly we are part of it, and as part of our own wish we are with Azerbaijan."[15]


Pakistanis and Turkish flags hang over the balconies of a residential building in Baku

On October 8, Roznama Ummat published a report titled as "Pandemonium among enemies after Azerbaijan's _expression_ of gratitude to Pakistan – Pakistan's ambassador in Baku given a briefing on Armenian missile attacks…"[16] The report also noted that a webinar was held by the Azeri Embassy in Pakistan with the support of Pakistani officials on the defense of Azerbaijan.[17]

Among other things, the Urdu daily observed: "Many people had claimed that 'jihadis' from Pakistan and Afghanistan were being transferred to Azerbaijan. To some extent, this commotion is not without reason. An article was published in the Azeri-language newspaper Daily Telegraph on October 4 in which the armed forces of Azerbaijan, Pakistan, and Turkey were called 'a power.' In this article, the size of the armed forces of Pakistan, Azeri forces, and the armed forces of Turkey was discussed. The article also referred to the military cooperation between Azerbaijan and Pakistan…"[18]

Pakistan's military relationship with Azerbaijan is not new. Another report in Roznama Ummat discussed the use of missiles and drones in the Nagorno-Karabakh war. It also noted: "This war is different from the conflict in 1994 when Azerbaijan's military stood demolished and being helpless after Armenia's invasion, the Azeri government sought help from the government of Pakistan and the mujahideen of Afghanistan."[19]

Although the Nagorno-Karabakh war began on September 27, it appears that Pakistan's support to Azerbaijan might have begun much earlier. In mid-August 2020, the Pakistani vlogger Moin Qazi posted a YouTube video titled, "Which Country Loves Pakistan Most?" The location of posting for the video is Baku. Qazi shows how he is overwhelmed by the love he gets as a Pakistani in Baku – a woman enables him to enter metro when he cannot speak Azeri, a shopkeeper refuses to take money for groceries, a youth shocks him when he says, "Pakistan and Azerbaijan are friends" by responding: "No friends, brothers, brothers."[20]

In the end, Qazi, who is surprised by the adulation he gets as a Pakistani in Azerbaijan, asks: "But the question arises: why do Azerbaijani people have so much love for Pakistan?" Qazi, being an ordinary Pakistani, is not well placed to answer this question, but Haider, being a journalist and knowledgeable about Pakistan's military involvement in Azerbaijan, was well placed to do so. Qazi says it is due to Pakistan's having been is among the first to recognize Azerbaijan in 1992 as the USSR fell apart. Qazi's vlog was tweeted by the Azeri Ambassador to Pakistan Ali Alizada on January 24, 2021.[21]


December 12, 2020: a photo tweeted by Ambassador Alizada. His tweet reads: "The relief assistance for some of the needs of military personnel and others working in recently liberated territories of #Azerbaijan was delivered to #Baku by Pakistan."[22]

Roznama Ausaf – an Urdu daily published from six Pakistani cities, and London – carried a report titled as "Conflict with Armenia – Pakistani military's support for Azerbaijan."[23] According to the report, the Azeri ambassador to Islamabad Ali Alizada went, on October 9, to the Joint Staff Headquarters of the Pakistani military in Rawalpindi where General Nadeem Raza, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, told him: "The armed forces of Pakistan support completely Azerbaijan's position on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict."[24]

On October 8, a day before the Rawalpindi meeting, a YouTube channel, which reports on Pakistani defense preparedness, noted: "A big delegation group will reach Islamabad today. This group will hold meetings with Pakistan's secret institutions and higher military officials. During this, it will discuss the purchase of all weapons necessary in the war in Azerbaijan. And the delivery of these weapons will be made available on an emergency basis."[25]

On the day Ambassador Ali Alizada was meeting General Nadeem Raza, Roznama Ausaf published an editorial titled "The Dream Of Making Pakistan An International Power And The Responsibilities."[26] The editorial, referring to a statement of Prime Minister Imran Khan about turning Pakistan into a global power, praised the role of Pakistan's nuclear weapons status achieved against numerous odds, adding: "Countries raising questions on the security of our nuclear assets today consider it a matter of pride to take lessons from our 'center of excellence.' If we can achieve excellence in this difficult technology, then why not in other fields?"[27]

After Azerbaijan won the war, there were celebrations in Baku and elsewhere in Azerbaijan. It is not incidental then that the Pakistani national flag, along with the Turkish and Azeri flags, were seen in these celebrations as well as in the liberated areas of Karabakh. On January 17, Ambassador Alizada shared a video of a street in the vicinity of Baku lined with the flags of all three countries, something that cannot be achieved without governmental support.[28] On January 28, Alizada shared a photo of a wall in a freed area of Karabakh with flags of Turkey, Pakistan, and Azerbaijan.[29] After victory, Alizada tweeted that "during the war" Azerbaijan showed strong unity and "was also supported by several countries" that were "with us on these days…"[30]


Haider's video shows the Pakistani flag in Karabakh after Azerbaijan's victory

This analysis does not consider accusations of Pakistani military involvement in the Nagorno-Karabakh war from non-Pakistani sources, such as the Armenian and Indian media. Pakistan has officially denied its role, but there is more here than meets the eye. After Joe Biden became the president of the United States, Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi declared in an interview: "You have to engage with this new Pakistan."[31] Pakistan is new. Pakistan is bold.

In the same interview, Qureshi sought to explain why the Pakistani flag was seen in Azerbaijan's celebrations: "We had not handed them (flags), this was the people's emotions, acceptance and tribute to Pakistan."[32] This answer is at best a camouflage. Haider is more forthcoming. After Azerbaijan's victory, the Samaa television host returned to his YouTube channel. In his video, Haider reminds the viewers that they would have got the details of Azerbaijan's victory, "But I am going to tell you something different. That is, how Azerbaijan has decorated the tiara of its victory to the head of its friend-nation Pakistan, to the head of Turkey; how a Pakistani's respect has grown in Azerbaijan now, Pakistanis are now going to Baku, not Dubai…"[33]

Haider splashes photos of Pakistan's flags shown in Azerbaijan's supermarkets, streets, and victory celebrations, and offers his assessment of the situation: "You can imagine from this how much respect Azeris have begun giving to you and us. Its credit goes to the Pakistani military. This is the Pakistani military's success, viewers."[34] He also shows a photo of the Pakistani flag in Karabakh tweeted by Ambassador Alizada and his tweets. Haider notes how Alizada thanked Pakistan for its victory – in his tweet stating "Many thanks @ForeignOfficePk, @OfficialDGISPR & @GovtofPakistan"[35] – and singles out the fact that the Azeri ambassador has especially mentioned @OfficialDGISPR, which denotes the director general of the Inter-Services Public Relations, i.e., the Pakistani military.[36]

* Tufail Ahmad is Senior Fellow at MEMRI

 


[1] Dawn.com (Pakistan), October 2, 2020.

[2] Roznama Ummat (Pakistan), September 29, 2020.

[3] MEMRI Daily Brief No. 256, A New Alliance Rising In The East – Turkey, Azerbaijan, Pakistan, China – And Its Enemies – The U.S. and India, February 3, 2020.

[4] Daily Brief No. 254, Under The Emerging Turkey-Pakistan Strategic Alliance, Pakistan May Provide Turkey With Nuclear Weapons Capabilities, January 19, 2021.

[5] Facebook.com/pakarmyislam, January 25, 2021.

[6] Roznama Ummat (Pakistan), October 1, 2020.

[7] Roznama Ummat (Pakistan), October 1, 2020.

[8] YouTube.com/watch?v=jKGLoi_achE, October 7, 2020.

[9] YouTube.com/watch?v=jKGLoi_achE, October 7, 2020.

[10] YouTube.com/watch?v=jKGLoi_achE, October 7, 2020.

[11] Youtube.com/watch?v=BSpE7-lrB2Y, October 4, 2020.

[12] Youtube.com/watch?v=BSpE7-lrB2Y, October 4, 2020.

[13] Youtube.com/watch?v=BSpE7-lrB2Y, October 4, 2020.

[14] Youtube.com/watch?v=BSpE7-lrB2Y, October 4, 2020.

[15] Youtube.com/watch?v=BSpE7-lrB2Y, October 4, 2020.

[16] Roznama Ummat (Pakistan), October 8, 2020.

[17] Roznama Ummat (Pakistan), October 8, 2020.

[18] Roznama Ummat (Pakistan), October 8, 2020.

[19] Roznama Ummat (Pakistan), October 12, 2020.

[20] YouTube.com/watch?v=suuzNpIUCQc, August 13, 2020.

[21] Twitter.com/ali_f_alizada, January 24, 2021.

[22] Twitter.com/ali_f_alizada, December 12, 2020.

[23] Roznama Ausaf (Pakistan), October 10, 2020.

[24] Roznama Ausaf (Pakistan), October 10, 2020.

[25] YouTube.com/watch?v=mL8WqrDO_4A, October 8, 2020.

[26] Roznama Ausaf (Pakistan), October 9, 2020.

[27] Roznama Ausaf (Pakistan), October 9, 2020.

[28] Twitter.com/ali_f_alizada, January 17, 2021.

[29] Twitter.com/ali_f_alizada, January 28, 2021.

[30] Twitter.com/ali_f_alizada, November 10, 2020.

[31] Pakistan Today (Pakistan), January 24, 2021.

[32] Pakistan Today (Pakistan), January 24, 2021.

[33] YouTube.com/watch?v=XFiNkVcnCqE, November 11, 2020.

[34] YouTube.com/watch?v=XFiNkVcnCqE, November 11, 2020.

[35] Twitter.com/ali_f_alizada, November 10, 2020.

[36] YouTube.com/watch?v=XFiNkVcnCqE, November 11, 2020.

Armenian opposition MP calls for increase in funding for science

Panorama, Armenia
Feb 10 2021

“Some 7,000 employees work at the institutions of Armenia’s National Academy of Sciences. How is the issue concerning the status of these institutions going to be resolved now? How are they going to be funded? Not to mention that the average salary in these institutions is low, standing at around 100,000 drams,” MP Mikayel Melkumyan from the opposition Prosperous Armenia Party said at the parliamentary debates on the package of bills on higher education and science on Wednesday.

In addition, the deputy highlighted the need to preserve the academic environment in universities.

“We are losing the academic environment. Which circle will become academic? You are talking about the administrative circle, but what is it? Thus, we will deprive the head of a university chair of the opportunity to exercise full control,” Melkumyan said, addressing Minister of Education, Science, Culture and Sports Vahram Dumanyan.

In response, the minister said he totally shares the concerns over the academic environment in universities.

“As for the National Academy of Sciences, the institutions are becoming more independent in this case. There are no problems with scientific institutions, which is very good. Funding will be provided directly to the institutions. As for the leadership, it essentially remains, it simply does not interfere in administrative and financial matters. The bill allows an academic institution to set up networks. These networks can form a coordination council, which can involve persons holding leadership positions,” the minister said.

Mikayel Melkumyan, in turn, called for an increase in funding for science in the state budget for 2022 to address the challenges facing the country. The education minister also agreed with the deputy.

“Now funding makes up one percent of the expenditures. We should expect up to four percent with the available funds, but it is unrealistic for now,” Dumanyan said.

More fallout from Karabakh: Chisinau says it’s prepared to retake Transnistria by force

Ukraine Weekly
Feb 12 2021

Nezavisimaya Gazeta journalist Svetlana Gamova suggests that the declaration of new Moldovan President Maia Sandu that Chisinau is now ready to use force to retake Transnistria reflects her formation of a government which is “proceeding along the Ukrainian path” (ng.ru/cis/2021-02-09/1_8078_moldova.html).

But a far more likely explanation of Chisinau’s new position is the impact of Azerbaijan’s victory in Karabakh and Baku’s ability demonstrated last fall to achieve by force what it wasn’t able to get by diplomatic means over more than 25 years, yet another way the fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan is echoing across Eurasia.

Ms. Gamova says that Ms. Sandu’s intentions have been signaled by the people she has proposed for key positions in the new government, a proposal that according to the Moscow journalist the Parliament is unlikely to approve, forcing another round of new elections in Moldova.

Those Ms. Sandu has named have long favored changing “the existing format of peacekeeping operations” in Transnistria, replacing Russian forces with “an international battalion consisting of soldiers of Romania, Poland and Ukraine, a step former Defense Minister Viorel Chibotaru says is necessary to counter Moscow’s “hybrid aggression” against Moldova.

The new Moldovan president has now proposed naming one of Mr. Chibotaru’s top officials, Anatolie Nosaty, as defense minister. Mr. Nosaty has been head of the ministry’s planning staff, but from Moscow’s point of view he is especially objectionable because he worked in the UN on peacekeeping operations after receiving a degree at the National Defense University in the U.S.

None of Ms. Sandu’s nominees are likely to be able to do much given that the Parliament won’t approve them, but they do signal how the wind is blowing in Chisinau. Ms. Gamova sees this as a decision to follow Ukraine’s course, but the impact of Azerbaijan’s victory almost certainly is greater.

At the very least, Baku’s achievement serves as a model of what is now possible for non-Russian governments no longer willing to put up forever with Russia’s use of the so-called “frozen” conflicts to retain Moscow’s influence in the former Soviet space.