U.S. Understands Armenia

U.S. UNDERSTANDS ARMENIA

Lragir, Armenia
Dec 26 2006

On December 26 at the Friday Club Alexander Iskandaryan, political
scientist, the head of the Caucasian Media Institute found it difficult
to tell how the U.N. Council of Security resolution on the Iranian
nuclear project will affect Armenia. The resolution provides for
sanctions against Iran. According to Alexander Iskandaryan, much
depends on the consistency of the United States, as well as the other
six parties of the nuclear negotiations in applying this resolution.

However, the political scientist points to the circumstance that
Armenia is the only country in the world the United States understands
its relations with Iran. All through this time Armenia has successfully
done what the United States prevents in other countries. According
to him, the United States realizes that Armenia is "doomed" to
cooperation with Iran and it cooperates not because it is against
the United States but because it has no other way out.

Besides, the Iran-Armenia partnership does not involve cooperation
on nuclear programs, says the political scientist.

Russia Cuts Drawn-Out Subsidizing Of CIS Countries – Gazprom

RUSSIA CUTS DRAWN-OUT SUBSIDIZING OF CIS COUNTRIES – GAZPROM

ITAR-TASS, Russia
Dec 26 2006

MOSCOW, December 25 (Itar-Tass) – Russia has been for several years
defending its economic interests in relation to other CIS countries
without confrontation, but firmly and consistently, a Gazprom’s
high-ranking official told Itar-Tass on Monday.

At present, Gazprom "stops long and drawn-out process of subsidy
assistance to other countries’ economies," he said.

"After Vladimir Putin came to power, Russia showed logic and
consistency and became to act taking into account its own national
interests," he said.

"We’ve begun from the most difficult – Ukraine, but tackled this
problem and stop subsidizing a foreign economy. Russia began to get
money it should for natural resources it owns by God’s will," he said.

Later Gazprom held long and difficult talks with Armenia that is
Russia’s strategic partner facing economic difficulties. "We’ve found
the way-out – lower prices plus payment in assets," the official said.

"It took much effort to resolve this issue with Georgia, whose
authorities preferred to turn a deaf ear on proposals Russia put
forward back in March. Nevertheless, last Friday Gazprom signed
contracts on gas supplies to the three Georgian companies at a price
of 235 U.S. dollars per 1,000 cubic meters," he said.

The talks are on with Azerbaijan – a country that has its own energy
resources. The Russian gas giant has practically reached an agreement
on gas exports to Moldova on the free market conditions.

The talks with Belarus are also underway. "As Belarus is a union
state (of the Russian-Belarussian union) it was proposed the most
advantageous conditions – 80 U.S. dollars per 1,000 cubic meters and
the payment of 50 percent by the Beltransgaz national gas company’s
assets," the official said pointing out that Gazprom continues to
subsidize the Belarussian economy.

"But Belarussian negotiators by some uncertain reasons insist on
inter-Russian gas prices. Meanwhile, there will be no export duties
for Russian gas. Taking such irresponsible steps Belarus poses a
threat to Russian gas exports as of January 1, 2007," he said.

"Russia by setting a fair gas export price carries itself with
responsibility. The authorities are responsible for their own
population that still has many-many problems to be tackled," the
official said.

Reporting To The Armenian Nation

REPORTING TO THE ARMENIAN NATION

Yerkir.am
December 22, 2006

Member of ARF’s Board Albert Achemian says the events celebrating
ARF’s 116th anniversary are a unique opportunity of reporting to
the Armenian nation and the circles supporting the party. Below we
present Achemian’s statement made during the event held at KANAZ
Cultural Center.

The decision to celebrate the Day of ARF was taken at ARF’s X general
convention in Paris. The Day of ARF was celebrated for the first
time on October 1, 1925 far away from Armenia, in "the gloomy and
unfortunate times" that followed sovietization of Armenia, as was
written in Droshak newspaper’s publication on celebration of the
first ARF Day. Ever since then, the ARF Day is celebrated in every
country of the world where ARF is present as an organization.

It is celebrated to keep alive among the new generation the traditions
of our ideological movement, to report to the Armenian nation and
circles supporting the ARF as a way of self-appraisal.

In 1990, when ARF returned to the homeland, it brought back this
tradition and the ARF Day was celebrated in Armenia on the occasion
of ARF’s 100th anniversary.

During this celebration, the ARF presented to the Armenian public
its Platform that was a consolidation of the main tasks facing the
Armenian politics, tasks that were inspired by the ARF’s history
of 100 years. The concluding paragraph of this document states,
"… We, the members of ARF, are aware of the great and tremendous
work that we all will have to fulfill in the coming years. Today,
when we once again launch our national-political struggle in the
homeland and from the homeland, we repeat our oath that has been the
purpose of our existence for one century:

To serve the Armenian nation with no reservations, To serve with no
expectations and ambitions, To serve with honestly and with complete
dedication, To struggle in a manner of Christapor Mikayelian’s
"Perpetual fight", for restoration of our nations full rights from
Artsakh to Mush, from Van-Vaspurakan to Yerevan".

This has been the purpose of ARF’s existence and the road it has
taken in its activities.

Struggle, action and service – 116 years of service and action aimed
at liberation of the homeland and the Armenian nation.

– Service and action that turned the poor Armenian peasants, the
oppressed Armenians into a society conscious of its rights through
the sacrifice of its founders, activists and soldiers.

– Struggle and action that restored the Armenian statehood from the
ashes of six centuries.

– State building whereby the statespersons did not become rulers
oppressing their people, but were dedicated servants who believed in
ARF’s principles of democracy and socialism.

– Service, action and sacrifice that turned the pieces of Armenian
nation spread throughout the world into organized Armenian communities,
and politicized youth that carried the flag of Armenian Question and
fought the struggle of Hay Dat sacrificing their lives.

Yes, this was the road the ARF took, these were the moral principles
of ARF activists, and they will be upheld in the future. And today,
when the ARF is celebrating its 116th anniversary, when it is back to
Armenia, when Armenia and Artsakh are independent states, ARF has the
challenges and problems facing the homeland and the Armenian nations
on its agenda, it has its own place and role in the Armenian reality
in general and Armenia’s multi-color political spectrum in particular.

The issues of Artsakh, Javakhq and Hay Dat remain as a constant agenda
and the purpose of its existence. Therefore, we do not believe it
is necessary to comment on ARF’s role, position and accomplishments
in pursuing these issues since the public is well informed about the
details of these issues through the press and media. We would like to
concentrate on the strategic challenges that Armenia and the Armenian
nation are facing today presenting the ARF’s position and role in
these challenges.

a. The issue of preservation of our independence and our
national-civilizational values

After the collapse of the totalitarian Soviet order, in a transition
period intensified by globalization, under conditions of absence of a
concept of nation state and national security, our nation, especially
our youth, are overwhelmed by the so-called market economy and the
business of culture whereby values and behavior models are imported and
imposed that are not compatible with our national values, perceptions
and that damage our independence. The ARF denies this outrageous
liberalist policy and believes that "the issue of cultural, spiritual
and intellectual development should be one of the most crucial areas
of state policy. Special attention should be paid to the role of the
Armenian family and the Church in preserving the national identity"
(ARF Platform).

b. Ensuring competitiveness of our country and the nation to ensure
survival and development

The only guarantee of our existence and development is our
competitiveness.

– Competitiveness in the economy, – Competitiveness in the politics
and propaganda, – Competitiveness in science, – Competitiveness in
the military and defense sector, – Competitiveness in culture and arts.

We are not, and cannot be competitive as long as oligarchs and
monopolies dominate our economy.

Our manufacturers are not competitive as long as there are no clearcut
policies and programs for encouraging and supporting industry and
exports.

Meanwhile, we are witnessing a tremendous increase of imports.

– We can be competitive and in some cases even accomplish success in
foreign policy and propaganda if we manage to mobilize our pan-National
and Diaspora potential.

– We could have been very competitive in science had we not wasted
our scientific potential due to lack of government support. We had
a potential: according to UN data, in 1980’s Armenia had the largest
number of scientists per the number of population. Fortunately, the
National Academy of Sciences was saved from being subjected to the
"free market" relations that threatened to turn it into merely an NGO.

– We are, and should stay, competitive in the military and defense
sector taking into consideration the difficult geopolitical situation
of our country.

We should be very grateful that this sector was not subjected to
the logic of "neoliberalism" that was voiced by our first president,
"Our defense is in our absence of defense."

c. The issue of integration of Armenia and the Diaspora, mobilization
of the unified nation and working towards one pan-national agenda
It is an unquestionable reality that today, after Armenia has gained
independence, the situation with the Diaspora has changed.

Today we have a Diaspora that is completely different from the Diaspora
of the past.

– in terms of territory and location (the former Soviet countries,
etc.), – in terms of its image and the organizational issues it
is facing.

Who deals with Diaspora issues today? It might seem that the Armenian
state should be dealing with it, but, unfortunately, this is not
so. Therefore, the issue of giving new energy, content and quality
to organize the Diaspora remains one of ARF’s greatest challenges.

– integration of new communities in the classical Diaspora, –
preservation and organization of the poorly-organized communities,
– integration of the entire Diaspora as a political actor with the
homeland.

The relations between Armenia and the Diaspora after Armenia’s
independence developed slowly and in limited areas. This does not
satisfy ARF’s expectations and views. On June 5, 1920, the parliament
of the First Republic of Armenia decided, "to grant citizenship of
the Republic of Armenia to all persons that have Armenian ancestry
but live outside of the Republic." With this decision, the Armenian
state considered Armenia as the homeland of the entire Armenian
nation, and the Armenian government as the government of the entire
Armenian nation.

The underlying principle was to have one homeland and one Armenian
nation.

It is ARF’s desire that the independent Republic of Armenia should
follow the same road to integrate the Diaspora and let it participate
in the life of the homeland instead of only asking its assistance, and
cooperation, in the best case. And the first step of this approach,
as stated in ARF’s Platform, can be ensuring the right of every
Armenian individual to become a citizen of Armenia.

d. The issue of establishing a modern system of public administration
striving for social justice A state system that must: – ensure equal
opportunities and conditions for entrepreneurship and initiative, –
ensure equal accessibility of law, – prevent any possibilities for
discrimination threatening the human life, development and social
security.

These are tasks that fully coincide with ARF’s socialist views on the
state’ s role and obligations vis-a-vis the society and individuals.

The state system would be imperfect if it is not consolidated
with democracy, with the people’s checking and balancing role and
participation. As the ARF’ s Platform states, "The ARF believes that
socialist ideals cannot be realized without democracy, and democracy
is limited without socialism".

Our people are facing this phenomenon today: we can see that due to
the unfair socio-economic conditions democracy becomes a tool in the
hands of the rich and the strong who get a majority in the parliaments
and the executive.

Therefore, for ARF, the main guarantees for strengthening the Armenian
state are creating of a rule-of-law country, ensuring the well-being
of the population, establishment of democracy and social justice. ARF
pursues these goals with the actions and services of its dedicated
members and the wide support of the people.

* * * The challenges Armenia and the Armenian nation are facing make
ARF’s main principles of perpetual struggle and action, readiness to
sacrifice one’s life, and the revolutionary will to deny and counter
any unjust oppression, whether internal or external, more than relevant
for our today’s reality.

This is the mission that ARF with its history and actions has embodied
and pursued.

Church leaders raise plight of Christians at birthplace of faith

Church leaders raise plight of Christians at birthplace of faith

The Times (London)
December 22, 2006, Friday

BETHLEHEM British church leaders yesterday made a pilgrimage to
Bethlehem, praying with fellow pilgrims in the Church of the Nativity
and Manger Square, right.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, and the Archbishop
of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, were joined by
the Reverend David Coffey, the Moderator of the Free Churches, and
Bishop Nathan Hovhannisian, the Primate of the Armenian Church of
Great Britain.

Cardinal Murphy-O’Connor, who was expressing his concern for the plight
of Christians in the Holy Land caught up in the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, described the visit as pastoral rather than political.

"I came here with my fellow pilgrims…to say to all Bethlehemites,
particularly the Christians who are here, that the rest of the
Christian Church is with them," he told pilgrims.

The clerics are on a four-day visit to the Holy Land from December
20 to tomorrow.

U.S. Charge D’Affaires Attaches Importance To Armenian Human Rights

U.S. CHARGE D’AFFAIRES ATTACHES IMPORTANCE TO ARMENIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS’ ACTIVITY AIMED AT DEVELOPMENT OF DEMOCRACY

Noyan Tapan
Dec 20 2006

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 20, NOYAN TAPAN. In connection with the Human
Rights Day, on December 20, U.S. Charge d’Affaires in Armenia,
Anthony Godfrey met with Armenian human rights activists. He attached
importance to the fact that in the whole world human rights activists
do their duties often being exposed to infringements, beating, arrest,
imprisonment and even danger of death. As Noyan Tapan was informed from
the U.S. Embassy in RA, A.Godfrey said that human rights activists and
NGOs play a significant part in establishment of free statehood. In
his words, democracy is incomplete without a viable civil society.

"The United States supports the brave citizens of Armenia who do
a considerable work in the sphere of assisting freedom of press,
fighting trafficking, protecting freedom of religion and women’s
rights," the U.S. Charge d’Affaires emphasized. He expressed gratitude
to Armenian human rights activists for "their work aimed at deepening
of democratic reforms."

No Anthem Yet

NO ANTHEM YET

A1+
[06:33 pm] 20 December, 2006

A number of usually absent deputies returned to the Parliament today
in order to secure quorum of the special session. Alongside with
several other issues, the Parliament discussed that of the national
anthem of the Republic of Armenia.

Minister of Culture Hasmik Poghosyan informed that after the first
reading the Government has received 35 offers 29 of which have
been accepted. But naturally, the Government has not renounced the
transitional provision according to which "Our Homeland" will remain
the national anthem until a new one has been decided upon. In this
connected Viktor Dallakyan reminded that the authorities who are used
to violating the Constitution violated it again, and since December
6 our country does not have an anthem.

Referring to the transitional provision, he noted that it means lack
of respect for the present anthem. "It is the transitional provision
of the transitional Government", Dallakyan said.

Representative of ARF Dashnaktsutyun Gegham Manoukyan said that because
of the idleness of the Government "Our Homeland" will not be performed
in the Republic Square in the New Year night.

Hmayak Hovhannisyan was the only deputy who spoke against "Our
Homeland" noting that "dignified death" (from the text of the song) is
in the past, and "the generation of Shahen Meghryan, Monte Melqonyan,
Leonid Azgaldyan, Samvel Babayan and Zhirayr Sefilyan has won the right
of dignified life". "And Khachatryan’s music is triumphant", he added.

Tomorrow morning the fate of the draft on the national anthem will
be clear. "We cannot conclude this special session without solving
this problem", announced NA Speaker Tigran Torosyan.

BAKU: Defense Ministry: "Vusal Garajayev Will Be Returned To Azerbai

DEFENSE MINISTRY: "VUSAL GARAJAYEV WILL BE RETURNED TO AZERBAIJAN"

Today, Azerbaijan
Dec 19 2006

"Vusal Magomed oglu Garajayev, captured on December 7, upon return
to Azerbaijan will be sent to prison to spend a long time there,"
so-called "NKR President" Arkady Ghukasian said in Yerevan December 17.

In his words, ‘the Azeri soldier knowingly crossed the border in a
grave health state, since he was constantly beaten by his fellows.’

"There is no necessity to investigate the incident, it’s clear."

Ghukasian remarked adding that ‘the captive does not want to return
to Azerbaijan fearing of savage punishment,’ PanArmenian quoting
Regnum IA.

The "NKR President" also informed that ‘within a day after capturing
an appeal was sent to the International Committee of the Red Cross
and presently technical issues are being settled.’

The officer of Azerbaijani Defense Ministry press service Ilgar
Verdiyev told the APA that Gukasyan’s words are a part of Armenian
propaganda. He said that Azerbaijani soldier got lost.

"At present the negotiations on hand him over are going on. Vusal
Garajayev will be returned to Azerbaijan."

It should be noted that Garajayev Vusal Mammad born in 1988 was
drafted from Aghdam Military Registration Department and was taken
as a hostage in Aghdam territory on December 7. But according to the
official sources the soldier got lost.

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/33976.html

Ex-Employee Of The National Security Council Was Called To General P

EX-EMPLOYEE OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WAS CALLED TO GENERAL PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE ON TERRORIST ACT IN PARLIAMENT

Yerevan, December 18. ArmInfo. Gourgen Yegizaryan, Ex-employee of
the National Security Council of Armenia (NSC), was called to the
General Prosecutor’s office yesterday evening. He is accused of giving
publicity to details on the terrorist act braking out in Armenian
Parliament in 27 October 1999, said Aram Karapetyan, Leader of the
New Times party in opposition, to the journalists today.

A. Karapetyan added that G. Yegizaryan asserted that a video recording
dated 2000 exists demonstrateing how Vagram Galstyan, one of the
terrorists, by psychotropic and other methods is made to give the
"evidences that the investigating group needed". The later committed
suicide in the cell.

"Criminal act against G. Yegizaryan wasn’t initiated yet. If it
happens, I can say a lot about events of the October 1999. After
it, many of representatives of NSC’s authorities will suffer. Let
them touch Yegizaryan, and then they will see what happens!", Aram
Karapetyan declared.

Armenian-Turkish Problems Must be Solved in Civilized Way

PanARMENIAN.Net

Armenian-Turkish Problems Must be Solved in Civilized Way
16.12.2006 13:02 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ There are two approaches in the
European Union’s stance towards Turkey: one group of
states and first of all Austria insist on privileged
partnership. And the second, group at the head of
Great Britain insist, that Turkey must be given some
time to fulfill the commitments on EU membership, said
in Yerevan specialist in Turkic philology Ruben
Safrastian, the director of the Institute of Oriental
Studies. `EU’s decision to halt the negotiations was
expected and it was a kind of compromise and Turkey
was given a chance to fulfill its commitments on
Cyprus issue,’ he stressed. Safrastian also underlined
that the Europeans do not want to shut the door in
front of Turkey at the same time insisting on their
stance. `It is very important for Armenia that Turkey
began the fulfillment of its reforms directed by the
EU, since for our state is crucial to have a
predictable neighbor, which will acknowledge its past.
Armenia is interested in the civilized settlement of
Armenian-Turkish problems,’ said Safrastian. At the
same time he underlined that the European community is
well aware of modern Turkey and does not want to have
a state in the Union which does not share European values.

Ratification Leaves Problems Unsolved

RATIFICATION LEAVES PROBLEMS UNSOLVED
by: Svetlana Kuskova

Source: Voenno-Promyshlenny Kuryer, No 47, December 6 – 12, 2006, p. 12
Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
December 13, 2006 Wednesday

The CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization: military personnel
training accord comes into effect

MILITARY PERSONNEL TRAINING ACCORD OF THE CIS COLLECTIVE SECURITY
TREATY ORGANIZATION AND PROBLEMS OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION; Member states
of the CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization train military
personnel together.

The Council of Defense Ministers of the CIS Collective Security
Treaty Organization met in Brest on November 23. The defense ministers
traditionally discussed military-political situation in member states
and the Organization’s zone of responsibility. They also discussed
military-technical cooperation and military personnel training. No
wonder officials of the Secretariat and United Headquarters of the
Organization met with trainees from the national armies of Armenia,
Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan studying
at Russian military educational establishments.

The meetings took place on November 29 and 30.

Russia launched the military personnel training program for CIS
countries in 1996. Some trainees are paying in full, others are
entitled to a discount (meaning that the training is free of charge
but residential expenses are covered by the trainee’s army). As a
matter of fact, it is with the latter that problems were encountered.

Some former sister nations never recompensed Russian military
educational establishments for the provided uniforms, meals, or
quarters. They did not do so because the matter was settled in a
different manner – say, the cost was subtracted from what Russia was
paying the respective CIS country for the use of military objects on
its territory.

Defense ministers of the Organization discussed the matter with
President Vladimir Putin in 2003. The following meeting, in Dushanbe,
resolved to organize joint military training. The heads of states
signed the military personnel training program in Moscow in June
2005. The document stipulates free-of-charge training and support.

This arrangement is certainly something new, thought up and introduced
in the Organization alone. Here are some figures reiterating its
efficiency. One hundred and fifty-nine servicemen from member states
came to Russia to study in 2003, 388 in 2004, and 795 in 2005. All
in all, trainees from Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan in Russian military educational
establishments number almost 2,500 men these days.

In November 2005, the Council of Defense Ministers compiled the list
of military educational establishments participating in the joint
personnel training program. The majority of them (45) are Russian.

The list also includes 6 Belarusian, 3 Kazakh, one Armenian, one
Kyrgyz, and one Tajik military college (57 in all). The list includes
nearly all military colleges that train needed specialists. The list
may be extended on the decision of the Council of Defense Ministers.

Ratification of the military personnel training accord by national
parliaments confirms member states’ interest in implementation of the
document. The parliament of Belarus ratified the document in January
2006 (six months after its signing) and that of Kyrgyzstan in March.

The Kazakh parliament ratified the accord in May and Armenian in
August. Sources in the Secretariat say that the military personnel
training accord is being considered by the involved Russian
structures at this point (Foreign Ministry, Defense Ministry,
Finance Ministry). The document is not even ratified by the Duma,
but official Moscow has already set aside nearly half a billion
roubles for its implementation.

Some problems and difficulties are, however, encountered, and hence
discussion of the matter at the closed meeting in Brest. In any
case, the subject became public knowledge all the same soon. On
November 29 and 30, executives and senior officers of the United
Headquarters met with trainees. A great deal of issues were discussed:
from establishment of regional army groups of the Organization to
traffic prevention.

In the meantime, the meetings were not centered around "global" issues
alone. More "mundane" ones were brought up as well, first and foremost
ones related to the terms of foreigners’ presence in Russia and to
organization of their studies. Our allies are nettled that they are
treated as foreigners in some colleges. Representatives of Kyrgyzstan
and Kazakhstan, for example, study in a group with African officers
in the Military Academy of the General Staff. It goes without saying
that the Kyrgyzs and Kazakhs on the one hand and trainees from Africa
on the other are at different levels. Armenian and Kazakh trainees
at the Faculty of Translation of the Military University are denied
probation spells which Colonel Mikhail Usachev of the Russian Foreign
Ministry explained were "not for foreigners".

As a matter of fact, the term "foreigner" was frequently used when
questions concerning the social sphere were asked.

The United Headquarters is now working on Provision on status of
servicemen of the Organization studying in Russian military educational
establishments. The document is supposed to make foreign trainees’
life in Russia better regulated and, generally, easier.

Valery Semerikov, Deputy General Secretary of the Organization,
promises that the document will handle all problems of the trainees –
financial, medical, transport, recreational. "The decision was made to
have the document endorsed by the heads of states and not by defense
minister," Semerikov said. "It will be done at the next meeting of
the Collective Security Council in the second quarter of 2007."