California Courier Online, April 6, 2006

California Courier Online, April 6, 2006

1 – Commentary
Media Criticism Pushes State Dept.
To Respond to Armenian Concerns
By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier

2 – Fear Fuels Turkish Denial of Genocide
3 – KCET’s Life & Times Profiles Filmmaker
Dr. J Michael Hagopian on April 12
4 – Commentary
‘Protestcide’ – The Killing of Protest of a Denial of Genocide
By Israel W. Charny
5 – Prof. Ronald Grigor Suny Will
Lecture April 14 at Merdinian
6 – Glendale Names Annual Diamond Award
Recipients for Achievement in the Arts
7 – Armenian Bar Association to
Honor Five Judges on April 12
8 – Ararat Home Dinner Dance
Committee Plans for April 29
9 – LACC Screens ‘Ararat’ on April 23;
Reception for Film Star David Alpay
10 – Armenia Fund Telethon
Story Touches Hearts
******************************************* ******************************
1 – Commentary
Media Criticism Pushes State Dept.
To Respond to Armenian Concerns

By Harut Sassounian
Publisher, The California Courier
As April 24 is drawing near, what Turks apprehensively call “the
approaching Armenian Tsunami” is haunting not only the Turkish government
but also officials at the State Department.
Various newspapers have unleashed a barrage of attacks on the State
Department in recent weeks questioning and even castigating it for not
acknowledging the Armenian Genocide and recalling the U.S. Ambassador to
Armenia, John Evans who had dared to utter the words, Armenian Genocide.
The news of his recall was first reported by this writer last month.
The following articles and editorials were published in the last two weeks:

— The Los Angeles Daily News headlined its March 21st article: “Status of
U.S. ambassador to Armenia questioned.” The paper quoted Cong. Adam Schiff
as saying: “I made it clear [to the State Dept.] I thought any action taken
against him [Amb. Evans] would merely compound the erroneous policy of the
administration.”
— The Los Angeles Times published a lengthy and hard-hitting editorial on
March 22, titled: “It was genocide.” It said: “the State Dept. has long
avoided the word ‘genocide,’ not out of any dispute over history but out of
deference to Turkey…. It is time to stop tiptoeing around this issue and to
accept settled history…. Punishing an ambassador for speaking honestly
about a 90-year-old crime befits a cynical, double-dealing monarchy, not
the leader of the free world.” The editorial concluded: “One day, the
country that was founded as a direct repudiation of its Ottoman past will
face its history squarely, as part of a long-overdue maturing process. Some
day before then, we hope, the State Dept. will too.” The week before this
editorial was published, this writer along with a colleague met with the
editorial board of the L.A. Times.
— The Independent (UK) published on March 23 an article titled: “Row over
US ambassador’s Armenia genocide remark.” The paper reported: “protests are
growing over the possible recall of the US ambassador in Armenia.”
— The Fresno Bee published an editorial on March 24, titled: “Speak the
Truth: U.S. ambassador to Armenia in hot water over use of ‘genocide.'” The
paper’s editors castigated the State Dept. for threatening the career of
Amb. Evnas by saying: “Shame on the State Department.” The Fresno Bee
called on the State Dept., Congress, the administration, as well as the
government of Turkey to recognize the Armenian Genocide: “The facts are
plain. The history is clear. Turkey offends the victims’ survivors with its
intransigence, but hurts itself most of all when it continues to deny what
the entire world knows.”
— The Glendale News Press published a front-page story on March 26,
titled: “Officials question the fate of diplomat.”
— The chain of McClatchy newspapers published on March 28 a lengthy
article titled: “Genocide comment could cost Ambassador to Armenia his
job.” It reported that Cong. George Radanovich (Rep. of Calif.) has called
the State Dept. requesting a meeting to discuss the fate of Amb. Evans.
— The Washington Times published an article on March 31, titled: “Recall
from Armenia?”
Following this barrage of news reports and commentaries, Daniel Fried, the
Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, addressed
the Armenian Assembly’s National Conference in Washington, D.C., on March
27. Here are excerpts from his remarks and responses to questions from the
audience:
“The U.S. position on events of 1915 has not changed. We believe that a
productive dialogue is the best way to establish a shared understanding of
history that honors the victims of these horrific events, murders on a mass
scale, killings without justification, deportations. Over 1.5 million
people lost their lives, innocent victims. But we want to foster
reconciliation and peace based on an understanding of history, not a denial
of it. We believe that the tragedy of 1915, the killings, is of enormous
human significance and its historical assessment should be determined not
on the basis of politics, but introspection among civic leaders and
scholars. This process has begun in Turkey where it needs to take place,”
Fried said. He was interrupted by a member of the audience who shouted:
“horse manure!”
Fried then continued: “Sitting here with us is my old friend John Evans,
our Ambassador in Yerevan. He is the Ambassador, remains the Ambassador,
has… [Applause and cheers]. Like all of us, we all serve at the pleasure of
the President. Amb. Evans came from Yerevan for the signing of the
Millennium Challenge Account Compact this afternoon, and will be in the
meeting this afternoon between Secretary Rice and Foreign Minister
Oskanian. There has been a great deal of speculation. I don’t discuss
personnel issues, but since my friend is sitting here, I thought I would
recognize Amb. John Evans [Applause].”
When asked why foreign countries such as Turkey are permitted to dictate
America’s foreign policy vis-à-vis Armenia and Cyprus, Fried replied:
“Third parties are not permitted to dictate our foreign policy, nor do they
dictate our foreign policy. We have a policy which many of you disagree
with. I understand. But we have a policy of seeking to encourage Turkey to
reflect more seriously about subjects which have been taboo for generations
in that country. I said earlier that process has begun in Turkey. You
recall that the famous Turkish writer Orhan Pamuk spoke clearly about this.
He is not the only Turk speaking out. As I said, this process has begun as
Turkish society modernizes, and as it modernizes, as democracy in Turkey
deepens, Turkey will have to go through what many other countries such as
the United States have had to go through in our own history, which is
looking back at the darker spots in our past. With respect to the United
States, those darker spots include things like slavery and racial
discrimination, treatment of American Indians, and in my opinion,
internment of American citizens of Japanese origin in camps in World War
II. Those are painful subjects. Just as dealing with the history of the
mass killings of Armenians is painful for Turkey. And by the way, I say
this to my Turkish friends using the same words. We keep one set of books.
Now that process has begun in Turkey. It is certainly not going fast enough
to satisfy you. It is not going fast enough to satisfy us. But this process
has begun and it will, I hope, bring greater understanding to Turks of
their own history. We will continue to have a dialogue about this as April
24th approaches. I will not attempt to anticipate what the President will
say. I do believe he will issue a statement on April 24th, in fact I can’t
believe there won’t be one. And I expect, as we have in the past, to
consult with the Armenian Assembly about this and to have a frank set of
discussions before and after.”
In response to a question about “Turkey exporting its denialist tactics to
the U.S.,” Fried said: “The United States government has never denied the
events of 1915. We do not support, what was the phrase, “export of
denialist literature or positions.” We do support efforts by Turkey to deal
with its history more seriously. As I said, this process has begun. It has
not ended. Efforts such as the Truth and Reconciliation Commission [the
correct name is: “Turkish Armenian Reconciliation Commission” or TARC] were
serious, and these were efforts in which Turkish as well as Armenian
scholars were involved. It produced a serious look at those issues which we
have recognized officially. This is not an easy issue. It is not an easy
issue for the United States government, and we are not at the end of the
road on this issue. We will continue to urge our Turkish friends to face
difficult issues of their past seriously, and we will urge Armenia to help
the Turks make this possible without ever sacrificing historical truth or
your position.”
When asked a direct question about the recall of Amb. Evans, Fried provided
the usual evasive answer: “We all serve at the pleasure of the President. I
won’t discuss personnel issues. Amb. Evans, as I said, is a friend of more
than 20 years standing. He’s our Ambassador. He’s right here. He will be in
the meetings today at the State Department, as I said. [Applause].”
The above exchange shows that while Dan Fried was trying to be as gracious
as possible to his Armenian hosts, he was nevertheless sticking to the
administration’s unacceptable policy of substituting euphemisms for the
Armenian Genocide. He also continued to avoid making any forthright
comments on Amb. Evans, despite persistent media criticisms.
************************************** ************************************

2 – Fear Fuels Turkish Denial of Genocide
By Jay Logan Rogers
SALT LAKE CITY, UT – The Turkish government refuses to acknowledge the
genocide committed against the Armenians, said Richard Hovannisian,
professor of Armenian and near-eastern history at the University of
California at Los Angeles.
He said there are psychological reasons that Turkey refuses to admit the
genocide occurred.
“They don’t want to believe that their grandparents could’ve been
murderers,” Hovannisian explained. “They also don’t want to deal with the
consequences of recognition, including contrition and restitution.”
Hovannisian commented on the contemporary interpretations of the Armenian
genocide at the Hinckley Institute of Politics on March 23.
Between 1915 and 1918, actions of the government of the Ottoman Empire
(present-day Turkey) resulted in the elimination of a substantial portion
of its Armenian minority population.
While the exact numbers are in dispute, most scholars agree that more than
one million Armenians were killed through outright massacres and mass
deportations to barren deserts, where they were left to starve.
Hovannisian’s talk focused on the scholarly debate over whether the
genocide was premeditated or a “crime of passion” that occurred suddenly
during the tense conditions of war.
He expressed his opinion that the elimination of the Armenians had been
contemplated by the Ottoman government before the outbreak of war, but that
it was wartime conditions that allowed it to turn a “final solution into an
accomplished fact.”
The Ottoman Empire distrusted the Armenians, in part because they were a
tight-knit Christian ethnic group in the middle of a mostly Muslim empire,
Hovannisian said.
While some Armenians were agitating for self-government and autonomy, most
were not involved in any politically dissident activities, he said.
“They were an ethnic group seen as potentially troublesome to an
authoritarian state at war,” he said.
No official government document specifically outlining the Ottoman plan to
eliminate Armenians has been found, although there is overwhelming evidence
that the massacres occurred, he said.
There may be a “smoking gun” somewhere in Turkish archives proving that the
Ottomans premeditated the Armenian genocide, Hovannisian said, but the
nation’s government does not provide Western historians with access to
those materials.
Jonathan Cates, a senior in history and Middle East studies, said he
thought it was a fair explanation of the historical event. “He gave a broad
overview of all the current interpretations and put them in good context,”
he said.
Mariya Mamaeva, a senior in political science and Russian, agreed. “I think
he has very good points and is very insightful,” she said.
************************************************** ************************
3 – KCET’s Life & Times Profiles Filmmaker
Dr. J Michael Hagopian on April 12
LOS ANGELES – Life & Times, KCET television’s signature local news and
public affairs series, profiles Armenian filmmaker Michael Hagopian on
April 12, in a segment that will also be available online at KCET.org.
For 25 years, Hagopian has traveled the world interviewing survivors of
the Armenian mass killings of 1915. Host Val Zavala visits with the former
UCLA professor-turned-filmmaker at his home-based workshop, which contains
about 400 interviews he has captured on film for his next documentary
“Caravans Along the Euphrates.” Life & Times airs Monday – Friday (6:30
p.m. – 7 p.m..) on KCET.
Born in Turkey, Hagopian and his family survived these killings, also known
as the Armenian Genocide, because his father, a skilled physician, was in
great demand. The story of Hagopian’s filmmaking career begins in Fresno,
California, includes stops at prestigious universities, and takes viewers
on a fascinating journey of one man’s passion for communicating the history
of his homeland through film. Hagopian has produced and directed two
documentaries on the Armenian genocide. Now in his 80’s, Hagopian’s third
and current project, “Caravans Along the Euphrates,” is significant because
it uses survivors to tell the story.
KCET broadcasts the premiere of “Le Génocide Arménien” (“The Armenian
Genocide”), the 2005 documentary by French filmmaker Laurence Jourdan, on
April 17 (9 -10 p.m.). The encore of “My Son Shall Be Armenian” by
Armenian-Canadian filmmaker Hagop Goudsouzian airs on April 24 (9 p.m. to
10:30 p.m.), followed by a repeat of the Life & Times segment featuring
Michael Hagopian.
dditional information about the films and filmmakers is available on
KCET.org.
************************************* **************************************

4 – Commentary
Introduction by Richard Kloian
Press Liaison for IAGS
On the heels of a number of articles denying the Armenian Genocide,
beginning in December 2005 and for several weeks afterward, the President
of the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS), Professor
Israel Charny, drafted a critical response to one of the publications,
Commentary, to set the record straight and to criticize them for crossing
the line between responsible journalism, ethical editorial control, and
outright siding with deniers.
The irony in this will not escape those who remember that it was the very
same publication that many years ago published a piece on the Armenian
Genocide by Marjorie Housepian called “The Unremembered Genocide” which
helped trigger new interest in the Armenian Genocide. Israel Charny too
credits that article with his first learning about the Armenian Genocide.
In effect it was a major springboard years later to the first major
conference on Holocaust and Genocide that was held in Tel Aviv in 1982,
organized by Charny and others and it was the conference that for the first
time included papers on the Armenian Genocide.

‘Protestcide’ – The Killing of Protest of a Denial of Genocide
By Israel W. Charny
To what extent does a publication have the right to alter a Letter to the
Editor that criticizes the publication, and then to publish their altered
version of the letter without the full permission of the letter writer,
especially in light of his explicit refusal to approve their revision?
In December 2005, Commentary published a lengthy article denying the
Armenian Genocide by one, Guenter Lewy, a retired professor who has
previously published denials of other genocides as well, including a denial
that the Gypsies were victims of genocide in WW II (Simon Wiesenthal
defended the role of the Gypsies as fellow victims of the Holocaust, and on
several occasions wrote and told passionately of seeing the Gypsies in
Auschwitz in the barracks right next to his); and including a denial that
the Native Americans (Indians) were victims of genocide in America. It is
clear that Lewy has established himself as an arch specialist in denial who
has now relegated no less than three victim peoples to some kind of status
of sufferers other than victims of genocidal mass murder. I think that
readers of this current Commentary piece denying there was a genocide of
the Armenians had a right to know of the author’s previous publications of
denials (one of which was also in Commentary), but not a word was
mentioned.
Lewy’s article in Commentary is entitled, “The first genocide of the 20th
century?” Lewy himself mentions in his article that the International
Association of Genocide Scholars, of which I am the current president, had
passed a unanimous resolution some years ago confirming the validity of the
Armenian Genocide. When Commentary was approached by a colleague as to
whether they would publish a rejoinder to Lewy’s article by me, the editor
agreed immediately to receive a 600-word statement from me. So far to
their credit. But then in the grotesque sequence of censorship and
revisions of my rejoinder that follows, Commentary at first refused to
identify my connection to the same Association that passed the resolution,
and finally did in fact identify me as somehow affiliated with the
Association but eliminated identifying my leadership role. A personal
slight? Then it’s irrelevant. Or is it a diminution of the significance
of my protest? In the meantime, Commentary published a lengthy
rejoinder by Lewy in the same issue with the following statement that, by a
wave of the Lewy-Commentary wand removes any significance to our
association’s informed judgment: “I am less than impressed by the
unanimous vote of the International Association of Genocide Scholars that
the Armenian case ‘was one of the major genocides of the modern era” writes
Denier Lewy conclusively and then presumptuously slams the members of the
association that virtually no one (but him) has done real research.
No matter. Commentary commits more serious infringements to the point of
not allowing me to voice my definite judgment about their question, “The
first genocide of the 20th century?”
In my letter I write about how the Turks also killed other Christian
(therefore non-Turkish) groups such as the Assyrians and Greeks as well as
the Armenians (the first Christian people of Europe) and that this was
“outright genocidal murder.” Commentary removed this vital statement from
my letter. Remember, the article by Lewy they have published is asking
explicitly if this was genocide, and the section of Letters to the Editor
in February is re-entitled, “Genocide?” but my clear-cut rejoinder that it
was “outright genocidal murder” was not permitted.
Moreover, what does Lewy do? I say in my letter that I wonder if readers
of the Jewish-sponsored Commentary (this remark by me is also censored out)
know that the Turks were also responsible for two forced expulsions of Jews
from Jaffa-Tel Aviv in 1914 and 1917, both of which resulted in losses of
life of the elderly, infirm and ill. As if referring to this information,
Lewy says to me in his rejoinder, “Mr. Charny stops short of calling these
occurrences ‘genocide,'” but he and the hard-working editor who we have
seen manages to censor my writing so fastidiously, thus manage to get
across a message that seems to refer to the whole bigger original issue of
the Armenian Genocide. Now, not only have I not been allowed to say what I
did say that there was clear-cut genocide, but it is as if claimed
explicitly that I too don’t call the Ottoman murders genocide.
Higher-class deniers, like Lewy and Commentary, are a fascinating study in
the propagandistic logic-defying language mechanisms they employ —
Commentary also removed from my letter a reference to an article that
Daphna Fromer and myself published in the British journal, Patterns of
Prejudice in which we analyzed the language-logic of earlier deniers of the
Armenian Genocide.
Ultimately, my most serious criticism is that Commentary is fully
responsible alongside of its author for publishing a bald exposition of
denial of an established major genocide. Thus, I conclude my letter,
“Regrettably, Mr. Lewy and Commentary too have now earned places in the
pantheon of genocide Deniers,” but — by now you guessed it — you will
never see that sentence, or an earlier statement similarly critical of
Commentary in the letter they published.
I ask, do responsible publications in a free world have the right to censor
and arbitrarily revise Letters to the Editor beyond considerations of
space, bad language such as epithets, and ad hominem attacks (but not
legitimate major criticisms of an author or the publication!)? Obviously a
publication holds the ultimate power and can simply decline to publish a
letter (who will
ever know?). But to cut and revise and remove and distort the thrust of
the original message, and fail to advise and fail to get approval of
changes? I don’t know if there are legal controls against such tampering
with the lowly institution of a Letter to an Editor and/or op-ed writing,
but I do know such tampering violates the “natural law” of journalistic
integrity, and I think Commentary should be told so by an informed public.
Israel W. Charny is the President of the International Association of
Genocide Scholars, Editor-in-Chief, Encyclopedia of Genocide, and Executive
Director, Institute on the Holocaust & Genocide, Jerusalem.
An e-mail transcript of all texts and correspondence between Charny and
Commentary is available immediately on request to [email protected].
********’********************** *******************************************
5 – Prof. Ronald Grigor Suny Will
Lecture April 14 at Merdinian
SHERMAN OAKS, CA – The ARPA Institute will feature Prof. Ronald Grigor Suny
at a Lecture, “Why Genocide: How can
we Understand the Turkish Deportations and Massacres of the Ottoman
Armenians,” on April 14, at 7:30 PM in the Merdinian school auditorium.,
1330 Riverside Dr., Sherman Oaks, Calif.
Scholars have tried to explain the causes of the Armenian Genocide by
reference to religious differences between Armenians and Turks or the
racist nationalist ideology of the Young Turks and their ambitions to
create a “Turkey for the Turks.”
Professor Suny looks at the variety of explanations that have been offered
and suggests that in order to understand “why genocide” it is necessary to
supplement ideological and social explanations with an exploration of the
emotions involved.
Suny is Charles Tilly Collegiate Professor of Social and Political History
at the University of Michigan, and Professor Emeritus
of Political Science and History at the University of Chicago. A graduate
of Swarthmore College and Columbia University, he taught at Oberlin College
(1968-1981), as visiting professor of history at the University of
California, Irvine (1987), and Stanford University (1995-1996). He was the
first holder of the Alex Manoogian Chair in Modern Armenian History at the
University of Michigan (1981-1995), where he founded and directed the
Armenian Studies Program.
He has authored several books on contemporary Armenian, Russian and
Caucasian history.
Professor Suny has served as chairman of the Society for Armenian Studies
and on the editorial Boards of Slavic Review, International Labor and
Working-Class History, International Journal of Middle East Studies, The
Armenian Review, Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies, and Armenian
Forum. He has appeared numerous times on the McNeil-Lehrer News Hour, CBS
Evening News, CNN, and National Public Radio, and has written for the New
York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Nation, New
Left Review, Dissent, and other newspapers and journals. He was recently
elected President of
the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies (2006).
For more information, call Dr. Hagop Panossian at (818) 586-9660.
**************************************** ***************************
6 – Glendale Names Annual Diamond Award
Recipients for Achievement in the Arts
GLENDALE – The City of Glendale Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Department and the Arts and Culture Commission announced the winners of the
First Annual Diamond Awards for Achievement in the Arts. The winners will
be recognized at a public reception on May 3, from 6 to 8 pm in the recital
hall at Brand Library, 1601 W. Mountain.
This new program initiated by the Arts and Culture Commission recognizes
those artists, community members and organizations who have contributed
substantially to the cultural life of the co
mmunity. Nominations were solicited from the community in all categories.
The following winners have been selected as Diamond Award recipients for
2006: David Vartanyan, Young Artist; Mikayel Avetisyan, Artist; Lark
Musical Society, Arts Organization; Ted Osborn, Special Recognition; Edwin
& Hilda Navasartian, Arts Partners – Individual; Jane Friend, Lifetime
Achievement
Recipient Profiles
David Vartanyan is an 8th grade student at Wilson Middle School. He is a
prolific writer of poetry and prose. David is also the Spelling Bee Champ
for his school.
Mikayel Avetisyan is a conductor, composer and instructor at Glendale’s
International School of Music. He received his professional training in
Armenia, Russia, and Europe. He was the principal conductor of the Yerevan
Symphony Orchestra from 1994 – 1997 and the Artistic Director and Principal
Conductor of the Armenian Philharmonic Orchestra from 1997 – 1998. He has
successfully performed throughout the United States, France, Holland,
Greece, Spain, Russia and Turkey. His recordings with the Moscow Symphony
Orchestra were released in 1996 on RCA.
Lark Musical Society was established in 1989 by Vache Barsoumian to instill
the love of music and the arts in its students in a nurturing environment.
Lark actively contributes to fostering an awareness of the interdependence
of Armenian and Western musical arts.
Ted Osborn has been an extremely generous and active supporter of many
community organizations throughout his career; most recently the Alex
Theatre and Glendale’s Animation Initiative. Founder of Osborn Architects,
Ted is retiring in April but will remain in the community as an active
participant.
Edwin & Hilda Navasartian were nominated by Karavan Dance Studio because
of their commitment to the school over the last 5 years. This couple has
supported several dance schools besides Karavan, including Baert Dance
Center in Burbank, Krounk and Arabesq Dance Schools in Glendale
financially, physically and emotionally during concerts and regular dance
practice.
Their dedication and love towards the art of dance and young artists have
made them volunteer many hours.
************************************************* **************************
7 – Armenian Bar Association to
Honor Five Judges on April 12
PASADENA – The Armenian Bar Association (Armenbar) will honor five
outstanding judges on their accomplishments, retirements and
appointments, at an evening reception on April 12, 2006 at the Rococo Room
of Santorini Restaurant in Old Town Pasadena, California. The event is
scheduled to begin at 6:30 p.m.
The honorees include Federal Judge Dickran Tevrizian, Federal Magistrate
Judge Jacqueline Chooljian, and Los Angeles County Superior Court Judges
Richard Kolostian, Ruth Essegian and Maral Injejikian.
“Our organization has a duty to recognize the achievements of these fine
judges, who serve as tremendous role models for attorneys and law students
in the legal community,” said Datev Shenian, Board member of Armenbar.
Tevrizian is a veteran Federal Court judge sitting in the Central District
of the United States District Court. He was first appointed to the Los
Angeles Municipal Court in 1972, at the young age of 31. At that time, he
was the youngest person ever appointed to the bench in Los Angeles County.
He is a nationally recognized jurist who in 1986 became the first person of
Armenian heritage to be appointed to the federal bench. Tevrizian will be
honored for his distinguished career in public service, and upon his change
to senior status on the court.
Judge Chooljian was recently appointed a Magistrate Judge for the U.S.
District Court, Central District of California, where she will preside over
matters in Los Angeles. Prior to her appointment, she served as an
Assistant U.S. Attorney and Special Counsel to the U.S. Attorney for the
Central District of California. She is the first woman of Armenian decent
to be appointed to the federal bench.
Judges Kolostian and Essegian have recently retired from the bench, both
having served at the Northwest District, Van Nuys Courthouse. Kolostian
was appointed to the superior court bench in 1980 by Governor Jerry Brown.
At the time of his retirement in February, 2006, he was the most senior
judge in the Los Angeles County court system, having served 32 years.
During his distinguished term on the bench, he handled a number of matters,
including civil, probate, family law, criminal and juvenile matters. In
1988, he was named Trial Judge of the Year by the San Fernando Valley Bar
Association.
Judge Essegian was appointed in 1989 by Governor George Deukmejian. Prior
to her appointment, she served as a Deputy City Attorney in Pasadena, and
served as a Deputy Attorney General, handling professional licensing cases.
From 1983 to 1987 she joined the Deukmejian administration as a Deputy
Director and Chief of Legal affairs for the Department of Consumer Affairs.

While on the bench, she spent considerable time handling misdemeanor cases
out of the Van Nuys court.
Judge Injejikian was appointed in 1985 by Governor Deukmejian, and has
primarily handled criminal cases. She has had a distinguished career and
has established herself as an experienced trial judge. She is being
recognized for her elevation as the Supervising site judge of the East Los
Angeles Branch Court of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Central
District.
Armenian delicacies from the kitchen of the award winning Santorini
Mediterranean Restaurant will be served. The fee for admission will be $25.
for Armenbar members, $15. for students and $35. for non-members. For
more information about the event, visit the Armenian Bar Association
website at _www.armenianbar.org_ () .
************************************************* *************************
8- Ararat Home Dinner Dance
Committee Plans for April 29
MISSION HILLS, Calif. – The Ararat Dinner Dance Committee is busy making
arrangements for their annual gala dinner-dance on April 29 in the
Deukmejian Grand Ballroom at the Ararat Home in Mission Hills.
Plans are underway for a very enjoyable evening beginning with a festive
social hour with delectable appetizers, followed by a dinner provided by
Roubina of Roberts Catering.
Armenian and American dance music will be provided by the Continental Band
with Hovig Krikorian. Valet parking is always complimentary.
Nora Hampar, Dinner Dance Chairman states, “We are very fortunate to have
Senator Chuck Poochigian as our Master of Ceremonies. He’s one of the
busiest legislators in Sacramento, and has always been a friend of the
Home.”
The Dinner Dance is known for a very brief and efficient program which all
enjoy. The emphasis has always been on sociability, good food, enjoyable
entertainment, music and dancing.
Since moving this popular event from its regular November time slot into
the spring season, the Committee hopes to bring this event into a less
hectic season for all.
********************************************* ******************************
*
9 – LACC Screens ‘Ararat’ on April 23;
Reception for Film Star David Alpay
LOS ANGELES – The Los Angeles City College Foundation will present an
educational screening of Atom Egoyan’s 2002 film “Ararat,” a dramatic tale
which looks at the issues surrounding the Armenian Genocide, as well as a
reception for David Alpay, the young Canadian actor who portrays the lead
role in that film, at 4 p.m. on April 23, at LACC’s Camino Theatre, 855 N.
Vermont Avenue in East Hollywood.
Steve Maradian, president of LACC, who is also a cosponsor of the event,
noted that the afternoon’s program is being held in recognition and
understanding of the Armenian Genocide, which occurred in Turkey in the
early part of this century and in which approximately 1.5 million Armenians
lost their lives.
The event will serve as a fundraiser to set up scholarships for Armenian
students in the field of theatre and cinema/TV at the college. After the
film screening, a buffet reception will be held in the adjacent Caminito
Theatre and attendees will have the opportunity to meet Alpay.
Critics have called “Ararat” one of Atom Egoyan’s most provocative films to
date. The film is based on Clarence Ussher’s book “An American Physician
in Turkey.”
In the film, Alpay portrays a young man, Raffi, who, after being
interrogated by a customs officer, recounts how his life was changed during
the making of a film about the Armenian genocide. A resident of Toronto,
Alpay has appeared in a number of movies and TV teleplays since his debut
in “Ararat.” The film also features actors Charles Aznavour, Eric Bogosian
and Christopher Plummer.
For ticket information, call the LACC Foundation at (323) 953-4000, ext.
2490.
*************************************** ***********************************
10 – Armenia Fund Telethon
Story Touches Hearts
LOS ANGELES – One of the several documentaries and segments aided during
the 2005 Armenia Fund Telethon, touched the heart of one of the donors to
the Annual benefit, and produced a result that one can only hope is
reproduced many times over.
During the past 2005 Telethon, a story produced by the Telethon production
team featured Anush, a mother of 9 children who recently relocated to
Garnakar village of the Mardakert Region of Karabagh.
Despite the difficult and at times unbearable conditions her family has
gone through, the young mother was very proud of her life. She and her
husband are part of the ever-growing Armenian population of the fledgling
Nagorno-Karabagh Republic.
When asked what she needed at the moment, the woman responded with a humble
request for a cow so she could provide her family with milk, yogurt and
cheese.
Touched by her needs, donor Vrej Ter Petrossian decided to help the family
after viewing the segment last Thanksgiving Day.
After Armenia Fund located the woman and her family in the remote village
in northern Karabagh, Ter Petrossian facilitated for the purchase and
transportation of a cow to the family.
The family could not believe their eyes when they received the milk-bearing
animal.
Got milk?
******************************************** *******************************
*
The California Courier On-Line is a service provided by the California
Courier. Subscriptions or changes of address should not be transmitted
through this service. Information in that regard should be telephoned to
(818) 409-0949; faxed to: (818) 409-9207, or e-mailed to:
[email protected]. Letters to the editor concerning issues addressed
in the Courier may be e-mailed, provided it is signed by the author. Phone
and/or E-mail address is also required to verify authorship.

http://www.armenianbar.org

More Armenian-Azeri Skirmishes Reported

MORE ARMENIAN-AZERI SKIRMISHES REPORTED
By Emil Danielyan

Radio Liberty. Czech Rep.
March 30 2006

Armenia and Azerbaijan have reported fresh exchanges of fire between
their forces which have disrupted a regular international monitoring
of ceasefire around Nagorno-Karabakh and killed at least one soldier.

The Baku-based ANS television said on Thursday that an Azerbaijani
serviceman was shot dead in the westernmost section of the heavily
militarized Armenian-Azerbaijani frontier. The Azerbaijani Defense
Ministry confirmed the report, alleging an Armenian truce violation.

There was no immediate comment from the Armenian side.

The incident was reported from an area that has seen an upsurge in
cross-border skirmishes this month. Both conflicting parties have
reported casualties among their troops, blaming each other for the
fighting that followed the collapse of a crucial Armenian-Azerbaijani
summit held in France on February 10-11.

Tension has also risen along the main Armenian-Azerbaijani line of
contact east of Nagorno-Karabakh. The latest Azerbaijani casualty
was reported the day after a disruption of ceasefire monitoring
by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe in the
northeastern section of the Karabakh frontline.

The Armenian Defense Ministry said on Wednesday that OSCE field
observers accompanied by Karabakh officials came under Azerbaijani
gunfire as they were about to carry out what has become a routine
procedure. “Due to a lack of security guarantees from the Azerbaijani
side, Ambassador Andrzej Kasprzyk postponed the monitoring,” the
ministry spokesman, Colonel Seyran Shahsuvarian, told RFE/RL, referring
to the longtime head of the OSCE military mission in the conflict zone.

The Azerbaijani side claimed the opposite, however. The Interfax
news agency quoted an Azerbaijani military spokesman as saying that
Kasprzyk “heard shots fired from the Armenian section of the border
and ordered that monitoring be cancelled.” The OSCE official has not
yet commented on the conflicting statements from Baku and Yerevan.

Meanwhile, Azerbaijan’s dovish Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov was
quoted by ANS as saying that the latest fighting only demonstrates
that the Karabakh conflict is far from being frozen. “Azerbaijani and
Armenian soldiers are killed every week,” Mammadyarov said, adding
that the conflict should therefore be resolved “as soon as possible.”

Armeconombank And European Bank Studying Possible Introduction OfHed

ARMECONOMBANK AND EUROPEAN BANK STUDYING POSSIBLE INTRODUCTION OF HEDGING INSTRUMENTS INTO INTERNATIONAL MONETARY MARKET

YEREVAN, MARCH 29. ARMINFO. Armeconombank and European Bank for
reconstruction and development (EBRD) are studying a possibility
of introducing hedging instruments into the monetary market –
SWAPs and futures. At the International Banking Conference on Trade
Finance organized by EBRD and Armeconombank in Yerevan, Armeconombank
Executive Board Chairman Ashot Osipyan informed journalists that the
instruments of financing will facilitate the entry of the real sector
to new sales markets and to establishment of new partnerships.

Osipyan said that many business meetings and consultations were held
in the course of the conference on the topic of increasing the trade
finance and opening credit lines. All these measures aim to promote
the real sector and circulating assets. Now, Armeconombank, which has
been working with EBRD on the trade finance program since 2003, is a
leader in this market. It provides its clients with monetary resources
for up to a 1.5 year. On the whole, the bank has already effected 115
documentary credit and guarantee operations for a total of $8 million.

“Out experience shows that the cooperation with the institutional
donor, such as EBRD, is a driving force of economic development. Now,
we are implementing already the fifth joint program with the bank. It
concerns co-financing of big enterprises. Due to the support of EBRD,
at the given stage we are working to bring the bank in the line with
international standards. At the next stage, we shall start a direct
cooperation with foreign banks. However, Armenian producers suffer
difficulties with sale of production and our bank will facilitate
this task through trade finance,” Osipyan said.

He also noted that the bank is preparing for a lunge in the mortgage
crediting market. For this purpose, the banks is intensively
negotiating with a number of international donor organizations.

Campus No Place To Censor

CAMPUS NO PLACE TO CENSOR

The Calgary Herald (Alberta)
March 29, 2006 Wednesday
Final Edition

It’s been some time since institutions of higher learning have been
incubators of free expression and dissent from orthodoxy. Quite
the opposite.

When universities are not busy creating speech codes, they are
otherwise engaged in thumping on opinions they deem unsuitable.

Consider Harvard University’s recent harassment of its own now
ex-president, Lawrence Summers, after he mused on why women have not
garnered more awards in science and mathematics.

In a laudable exception this week, the University of Calgary’s
administration showed good judgment. It allowed the campus pro-life
association to set up a display with graphic images of aborted fetuses
(albeit under pressure from the association’s lawyers, noting the
constitutional grounds for such displays).

Less admirable was the attempt by the university’s students’ union to
restrict it. Since the display was to be on union-leased property,
the students’ union agreed to allow it to stand only if the graphic
posters were turned inward. A SU spokesman called it a reasonable
compromise. (The club chose instead to set up the display on non-SU
controlled grounds.)

One wonders whether the students’ union would make such a demand to
a group that wanted to publicize, say, pictures of the East Coast
seal hunt, or Armenian genocide. Indeed, one SU spokesman said he
was unaware of any similar demand on other groups.

If all controversial exhibits were asked to self-censor, competing
campus factions would be left to debate today’s weather forecast.

The issue at stake is not one’s position on abortion, or who finds
what disturbing — it’s about the right to dissent. That’s something
many university students fancy themselves in favour of.

The students’ union might recall the words Abigail Thernstrom,
vice-chair of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that universities
are “islands of repression in a sea of freedom.”

The students’ union should try not to live up to that quip.

UNESCO Expert To Study Destruction Of Armenian Khachkars

UNESCO EXPERT TO STUDY DESTRUCTION OF ARMENIAN KHACHKARS

AZG Armenian Daily
29/03/2006

UNESCO Director General Koichiro Matsuura expressed readiness to send
a group of experts to Nakhijevan to study the site of destruction of
ancient Armenian monuments. Last week Chairman of the World Armenian
Congress Ara Abrahamyan, being a UNESCO good will Ambassador during
an official meeting drew Koichiro Matsuura’s attention to destruction
of the Armenian cemetery in Old Jugha by Azerbaijanis. In the words
of chair of the European representation of all-Armenian structures,
Armenian FM’s Advisor Ashot Grigorian, Abrahamyan censured vandalism
regarding cultural monuments. Vandalism regarding Christian monuments
in Old Jugha entails negative political consequences as well and
more destabilizes the political situation in the South Caucasus,
Abrahamyan remarked. He also invited Koichiro Matsuura to visit Armenia
to get acquainted with treasures of the Armenian culture. The UNESCO
Director-General assured in case of receiving an invitation, he will
plan his visit to Armenia with pleasure.

Artur Baghdassaryan To Pay A Visit To Spain

ARTUR BAGHDASSARYAN TO PAY A VISIT TO SPAIN

ArmRadio.am
28.03.2006 17:15

Chairman of the National Assembly of Armenia Artur Baghdassaryan will
pay a working visit to Spain March 29-April 1. He is scheduled to
meet with Senate President Javier Rojo and Chairman of the Congress
of Deputies of Spain Manuel Marin Gonsales. March 29 in Valence Artur
Baghdassaryan and Belgian Senate President Ann Marie Lizin will open
the 5th forum of the World Alliance of Cities Against Poverty. 4
Armenian towns will join the Alliance.

Republicans Admit Accusations

REPUBLICANS ADMIT ACCUSATIONS

Lragir.am
27 March 06

The Republican Deputy Speaker Tigran Torosyan announced on March 27
that he agreed with the Orinats Yerkir MP Samvel Balasanyan, who had
observed that the activity of the Orinats Yerkir Party gets more
coverage during the Parliamentary Hour on TV, because the Orinats
Yerkir Party is more deeply engaged in legislative activity. “I agree
with Samvel Balasanyan that the Parliamentary Hour should cover
the activity that is performed, the speeches that are made in the
parliament,” says Tigran Torosyan, admitting that his address during
the plenary meeting of the Republican Party calling for more activity
as a parliamentary force has not been fulfilled. Tigran Torosyan states
that steps to fulfill his call were not sufficient, but he reassures
that the spring session of the National Assembly has just opened,
and in the course of time the Republicans will take greater initiative.

To the Memory of Artsakhi Martyrs

AZG Armenian Daily #054, 25/03/2006

Karabakh diary

TO THE MEMORY OF ARTSAKHI MARTYRS

A monument to the martyrs of the Artsakhi war will shortly be erected
in Stepanakert. Famous Artsakhi sculptor Albert Harutyunian has put
the model of the future monument for a contest these days. It is
currently exhibited in the museum of the union of relatives of
perished freedom fighters of Nagorno Karabakh. The first public
attendance has already been held. Seyran Ohanian, defense minister of
NKR, head of the Union of Freedom Fighters of Artsakh dubbed the model
worthy of attention. Meanwhile, he expressed hope that the idea of a
monument immortalizing the memory of freedom fighters will encourage
other sculptors to take part in the contest.

Author of the model Albert Harutyunian thinks its is expedient to
erect the monument in the area linking the WW II Monument and the
freedom fighters’ cemetery as a more visible site.

The monument is due to be opened in May 2007.

By Kim Gabrielian in Stepanakert

Turkish defence minister stresses importance of Turkish-US relations

Turkish defence minister stresses importance of Turkish-US relations

Anatolia news agency, Ankara
25 Mar 06

Washington, DC, 25 March: Turkish National Defence Minister Vecdi
Gonul has indicated that “relations with the United States is one of
cornerstones of Turkish foreign policy”.

Gonul delivered a speech on “Evolving security environment and
Turkey’s strategic role in Eurasia” in a conference organized by Los
Angeles World Affairs Council.

“There have been Turkish-US military relations at the highest level,”
he underscored, and noted that the volume of cooperation between
Turkish and the US defence industries amounted to 13bn US dollars over
the last 20 years.

Stating that Turkey and the United States attached great importance to
prevention of proliferation of mass destruction weapons and ballistic
missiles, Gonul recalled that Turkey, as an ally of NATO, stayed at
the front line against a possible threat of missile which might be
developed in the Middle East.

Gonul noted that Turkey always played a role of bridge between the
east and the west.

“The latest developments have shown there is lack of dialogue between
different communities worldwide,” Gonul stressed that Turkey’s EU
membership would give an important message underlining that different
cultures could exist together peacefully.

Pointing out to Turkey’s cooperation in US-led war in Iraq, Gonul
recalled that 4,990 sorties were conducted in the Turkish airspace,
Turkey’s Incirlik base was used and the parliament approved a
government motion permitting the dispatch of soldiers to Iraq.

Gonul noted that Turkey has doubled its economic and commercial
relations with Iraq since 2003, indicating that 50 per cent of
processed oil need of Iraq was provided by Turkey. He stressed that
one fourth of electricity need of this country would also be provided
by Turkey this year. Stating that Turkey supported peace process in
Iraq, he underlined that it also attached special importance to
territorial integrity of Iraq. Gonul said that Turkish public had
concerns over discriminative attitude of Kurdish population in Iraq.

“Natural resources of Iraq belong to all Iraqi people,” he stressed.

Noting that Iraqi election was a great step taken on the way of
democracy, he said that the new Iraqi government should focus on
constitutional amendment. Gonul said that Kirkuk was still a very
important matter affecting the stability in Iraq, noting that the
destiny of Kirkuk should be determined by all Iraqi people.

He noted that terrorist organization PKK [Kurdistan Workers’ Party]
was continuing its activities in the north of Iraq, stressing that
Turkey expected all relevant parties to solve this problem. “Turkey
considers that Iraqi government and coalition forces have equal
responsibility to end those activities there,” he said.

Gonul said that Turkey had sound and special relations with Israel and
Palestine.

Stating that Hamas should assume a reasonable attitude, he said that
Turkey was ready to assist efforts necessary to resume peace talks
within the scope of the road map.

He indicated that Turkey considered that Upper Karabakh issue was the
main obstacle in front of peace and cooperation in the region, stating
that a peaceful solution to this matter would contribute to
development of regional cooperation and would normalize
Turkish-Armenian relations.

First Reaction to Vano Siradeghyan’s Words

FIRST REACTION TO VANO SIRADEGHYAN’S WORDS

Lragir.am
25 March 06

It was the irony of fate or maybe God’s will that the members of the
National Unity, more exactly Alexan Karapetyan, were the first to
comment on the interview of Vano Siradeghyan.

On March 25 after the appearance of the interview in the Haykakan
Zhamanak Daily Alexan Karapetyan was the guest of the Azdak Club, and
naturally news reporters had an opportunity to ask for his opinion
first.

`I have not read it yet, said Alexan Karapetyan on March 25, between
12.20 and 12.30 o’clock. The reporters tried to convey some of the
words of Vano Siradeghyan, especially the part where he says `power
was cast at the feet of the leaders of the opposition, but they were
unable to pick it up¦’ And, generally, Vano Siradeghyan stated that
the opposition has nothing to do with the current internal political
situation.

In answer to Vano Siradeghyan’s words Alexan Karapetyan, one of the
leaders of the opposition, the deputy leader of the National Unity
Party, cited a Russian proverb, implying that Vano Siradeghyan was not
supposed to speak in that way. According to him, their party has
always asserted that the formers did not differ from the current
leadership. `He is not Lenin to write letters from Finland. They do
not act by letters. If he knows and can do so much, let him come and
do what he said he could,’ stated Alexan Karapetyan.