US president offers sympathy to Armenia over genocide history

ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
April 25, 2005 Monday

US president offers sympathy to Armenia over genocide history

BY Dmitry Kirsanov

WASHINGTON, April 25 – US President George Bush has offered profound
condolences to the people of Armenia in connection with the 90th
anniversary of genocide of Armenians by the Osman empire.

He stressed in his message that the US saw the future of the Armenian
state as promising.

The statement by the US president published on Sunday said the US
remembers the slaughter of one and a half million Armenians in the
days of existence of the Ottoman empire.

Bush said he joined his citizens and Armenians of the whole world in
expressing the deepest condolences about those terrible deaths.

He said the US was grateful to Armenia for its contribution to the
war against terrorism and to the efforts aimed at building a
democratic and peaceful Iraq.

Bush said the US remained committed to support of historical reforms
that Armenia had been pursuing over the past decade.

The US also calls on the Armenian government to broaden democratic
liberties that could help lasting and peaceful settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Bush added that the US was also set to achieve a deeper partnership
with Armenia, including cooperation in the security sphere and
contacts resting on market and democracy values.

The US president has expressed the hope that the proposal made by
Turkish President Rejep Erdogan in early April to set up a bilateral
expert commission to study facts of genocide of Armenia in 1915 would
serve to consolidation of freedom, peace and prosperity of Armenia
and Turkey.

E.U. to press Turkey on recognizing Armenian genocide, says France

Deutsche Presse-Agentur
April 25, 2005, Monday
13:10:19 Central European Time

E.U. to press Turkey on recognizing Armenian genocide, says France

Luxembourg

European Union foreign ministers meeting their Turkish counterpart in
Luxembourg this week will insist on Ankara’s recognition of the 1915
Armenian genocide, French Foreign Minister Michel Barnier said
Monday.

Recognition of the massacre of up to 1.5 million Armenian Christians
by Ottoman Turks between 1915-1923 is not a formal condition for
Turkish membership of the E.U.

But Barnier insisted the E.U. would raise the issue during membership
negotiations with Turkey set to open in Brussels in October this
year. Ankara would have to respond, he said.

The entire E.U. project was founded on the principle of
reconciliation, said Barnier.

“That is what the Germans and the French did and that is what Turkey
has to do … that is the challenge for Turkey,” Barnier added.

Turkey’s government has always insisted that there was no Armenian
genocide and says a far smaller number of Armenians died during
deportations which Ankara argues took place under war conditions and
were due to an Armenian rebellion. dpa si jm

Die Terken wollten sie ausrotten

Hamburger Abendblatt

Politik
22.0 4.2005

Die Türken wollten sie ausrotten
Völkermord: Auch 90 Jahre nach der planmäßigen Vernichtung der
Armenier regieren Angst und Vertuschung Ankaras Handeln.

Von Thomas Frankenfeld und Stefan Fuhr

Hamburg/Frankfurt a. M. – “Wer redet denn heute noch von der
Vernichtung der Armenier?” Der kleine schnauzbärtige Herr, der diese
Frage am 22. August 1939 vor hohen Wehrmachtsoffizieren und
Kommandeuren von SS-Sondereinheiten spöttisch in den Raum warf, war
seiner Sache sicher. Er war davon überzeugt, daß man über den
Völkermord an den Juden in späteren Jahrzehnten kaum reden werde, da
man auch die Vernichtung der Armenier längst vergessen habe.

Adolf Hitler hat sich gründlich geirrt; allerdings widmet die
Weltöffentlichkeit dem Leiden des armenischen Volkes zu Beginn des 20.
Jahrhunderts in der Tat noch immer beschämend wenig Aufmerksamkeit. Am
Sonntag jährt sich der Beginn des Genozids zum 90. Mal.

Seriöse Schätzungen sprechen von bis zu 1,5 Millionen Todesopfern
durch türkische Todesmärsche und Massaker ab 1915. Daß diese Greueltat
nicht im öffentlichen Bewußtsein steht wie die Shoa oder der
kambodschanische Holocaust, liegt vor allem daran, daß die Türkei seit
Jahrzehnten mit allen Mitteln das Ausmaß der Massaker und die Rolle
der türkischen Armee dabei zu verschleiern versucht. Wer in der Türkei
offen von einem Völkermord spricht, muß mit strafrechtlicher
Verfolgung rechnen. Der Hamburger Schriftsteller Ralph Giordano
spricht von einer “Industrie der Leugnung”.

Der türkische Nationalstolz fürchtet ein peinliches
Schuldeingeständnis, die Regierung in Ankara armenische
Schadenersatzansprüche. Für den Türkei-Experten Jan Cremer vom
Deutschen Orient-Institut in Hamburg ist das “Verhältnis türkischer
Offiziere und auch vieler Bürger zu ihrer Nation gemessen an
westeuropäischen Verhältnissen neurotisch.” Dabei hatte Großwesir
Damad Ferid Pascha am 11. Juni 1919 die Verbrechen der Armee
öffentlich eingestanden. Und im Erlaß des damaligen Innenministers
Talaat Pascha hieß es, die Regierung des Osmanischen Reiches habe
beschlossen, “alle Armenier, die in der Türkei wohnen, gänzlich
auszurotten.”

Das mürbe Osmanische Reich fürchtete damals den sich längst
abzeichnenden Zerfall und strebte einen ethnisch reinen Nationalstaat
an. Zwischen 1894 und 1896 hatte der türkische Sultan Abdülhamid
bereits bis zu 200 000 Armenier ermorden lassen. Und 1909 starben bei
Pogromen im Raum Adana noch einmal mehr als 20 000 Armenier.

Doch das Schlimmste stand den Armeniern noch bevor. Im Sommer 1915
schreibt der deutsche Botschafter in Konstantinopel, Hans Freiherr von
Wangenheim, an Reichskanzler Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg: “Die
Austreibung der armenischen Bevölkerung aus ihren Wohnsitzen in den
ostanatolischen Provinzen (…) wird schonungslos durchgeführt.” Wenig
später formuliert der Diplomat: “Die Art, wie die Umsiedlung
durchgeführt wird, zeigt, daß die Regierung tatsächlich den Zweck
verfolgt, die armenische Rasse im türkischen Reiche zu vernichten.”

Die deutschen Konsulate im Osmanischen Reich telegrafierten ständig
grausame Berichte über “Metzeleien”, “Massenabschlachtungen” und
Hunger-Märsche an das Auswärtige Amt.

Am 24. April 1915 hatte der eigentliche Genozid mit der Vernichtung
der gesamten armenischen Führungsschicht in Konstantinopel – rund 2350
Männer – begonnen. In den folgenden Monaten trieben türkische
Gendarmen und Soldaten eigens dafür aufgestellter Sondereinheiten fast
alle Armenier des Reiches in Sammellagern zusammen.

Wer nicht gleich einem der vielen Massaker zum Opfer fiel, wurde auf
Todesmärschen Richtung Aleppo nach Süden geschickt, direkt in die
leere Wüste. Es gab den ausdrücklichen Befehl, möglichst wenige
Überlebende ankommen zu lassen. Der Name des Wüsten-Todeslagers Deir
es Zor hat für die Armenier eine ähnliche Bedeutung wie Auschwitz für
die Juden.

Immer wieder überfielen halbreguläre Milizen – rekrutiert aus
amnestierten Schwerverbrechern – die Vertriebenen, raubten ihnen ihre
letzte Habe, um sie anschließend zu ermorden. Bis zu eine Million
Menschen starben nach Schätzungen allein auf den Todesmärschen. “Die
armenische Frage ist erledigt”, erklärte Innenminister Pascha kalt
gegenüber deutschen Diplomaten.

Talaat gehörte der politischen Bewegung der “Jungtürken” an, die in
der Revolution 1909 gegen das alte Regime an die Macht gekommen war –
neben Kriegsminister Enver Pascha gilt er als Hauptverantwortlicher
des Genozids. Die “Jungtürken” träumten von der Vereinigung aller
turkstämmigen Völker in einem Großreich “Turan”. Einem Reich, in dem
die Armenier keinen Platz mehr haben sollten. (HA/epd)

http://www.abendblatt.de/

ANKARA: Bak-Turk Fed.: No Armenian Would Like To See Historical Docs

Turkish Press
April 24 2005

Bak- Turk Federation: There Is No Single Armenian Who Would Like To
Be Side By Side With A Historical Document

ANKARA – BAK-TURK (Bulgaria, Azerbaijan, Crimea, Western Thrace)
Federation has held a symposium on the so-called Armenian genocide.

BAK-TURK’s Deputy Chairman Cemil Unal has indicated that there is no
single Armenian in the world who would like to be side by side with a
historical document. ”Armenians do not want to face historical
documents as such documents would imply the end of their dreams of
establishing a ‘Greater Armenia’,” said Unal.

Unal criticized the Turkish government’s decision to talk with the
Armenian President Robert Kocharian and commented that the suggestion
made to the Armenians was actually sent to the wrong address.

Former State Minister Dr. Haluk Cay has remarked that Armenians
betrayed Turks at a critical moment. ”Armenians not only hurt the
Turks, but also Armenians who did not think and act like them,”
stressed Cay.

Cay mentioned that during the war years not only Armenian populations
were deported but also those of Muslims. ”After the Russian troops
came to Erzurum, the Muslim population in the region were sent to
Central and Western Anatolia,” expressed Cay.

The audience at the symposium were introduced certain documents on
genocide allegations and Armenian population figures during the war
years.

Genocidio en Armenia

La Voz de Galicia, España
Domingo 24 Abril 2005

Genocidio en Armenia

Noventa años de lucha avalan al pueblo que sufrió el primer genocidio
del siglo XX. Armenia, lejos de olvidar el episodio más triste de su
historia, exige a Turquía que reconozca su papel en el exterminio de
más de un millón y medio de armenios durante la Primera Guerra
Mundial.

Civilización histórica
En primera persona: «Mi familia forma parte de la tragedia vivida»
Turquía: la otra versión de los hechos

(Eva Conde/Sara Barreiro)
Hace hoy noventa años, el pueblo armenio fue víctima de un genocidio.
El primero del siglo XX, y el precursor de otros muchos. Casi un
siglo después, las razones y fines de este exterminio siguen sin
aclararse. El Imperio otomano, de cuya desintegración surgió la
República de Turquía, terminó con la vida de 1.500.000 armenios. La
población total era de tres millones. Son muchos los países que
todavía no han reconocido las matanzas de 1915 como un genocidio.
Ahora, con la posible incorporación de Turquía a la Unión Europea, el
recuerdo del primer exterminio racial del siglo pasado se reaviva en
la memoria de muchos armenios, que no están dispuestos a que siga
permaneciendo en el olvido del mundo entero el dolor que sufrió su
pueblo.

Armenia es uno de los primeros países de religión cristiana,
declarada oficial en el año 301. Quizás sea esta una de las razones
más obvias por las que el Imperio otomano, de religión islámica,
pretendió el fin de una etnia. Eso y el hecho de que parte de la
población armenia ocupara territorio turco.

En 1914, el Gobierno turco comenzó a diseñar los planos para la
deportación de la población armenia residente en Anatolia oriental
por medio de una orden militar. Fue el inicio de la Primera Guerra
Mundial lo que propició la realización de los objetivos, ya que era
muy sencillo eludir la atención de la opinión pública mundial. El
Imperio otomano excarceló a los presos para formar grupos que,
posteriormente, se encargaron del trabjo sucio, y difundió entre su
población una fuerte propaganda anti-armenia.

Los métodos

«En febrero de 1915 alrededor de sesenta mil reclutas armenios fueron
desarmados y fusilados. Dos meses más tarde, el 24 de abril, los
líderes políticos, religiosos y culturales de Armenia fueron
arrestados en Constantinopla y ejecutados. De este modo, el pueblo se
quedó decapitado y privado de la parte más combativa, sus reclutas, y
se abrió el camino del exterminio», relata Vahe Hambardzumyan,
armenio residente en A Coruña desde hace 11 años. De ahí la
importancia de esta fecha, el 24 de abril, en la que los armenios
conmemoran la masacre de su pueblo, de sus gentes.

El siguiente paso consistió en organizar las caravanas de la muerte.
Con el apoyo del Ejército, de las bandas de presos organizadas por el
Gobierno turco y de los grupos de kurdos, se procedió al
reclutamiento de la población civil con el pretexto de alejarla de la
línea del frente. El destino de las caravanas eran los campos de
concentración de los desiertos de Siria. Pero muchos no llegaron. Las
matanzas comenzaron en los lugares de partida de esas caravanas. A lo
largo del recorrido hacia la muerte, las escenas dantescas se
sucedían. Los armenios sufrieron constantes acosos, violaciones, y
humillaciones, y todo ello acompañado de la privación de alimentos y
medios de subsistencia.

«Muchos niños, sobre todo menores de cinco años, son separados de sus
padres y entregados a familias turcas y kurdas», cuenta Artak
Lazarian, historiador armenio recién llegado a A Coruña. «El fin:
convertirlos al islam y borrar su identidad armenia», concluye.

Pocos supervivientes llegaron a los campos de concentración. Lo
hacían desnutridos y agotados. Pero su destino no sería otro que
morir a orillas del río Éufrates.

La diáspora

En aquel momento, solo consiguieron salvarse pequeños grupos
armenios, como el de la heroica ciudad de Van, que se resistió a la
entrada turca hasta la llegada del Ejército ruso, que,
posteriormente, y hasta 1917, procedió a la ocupación de Armenia.

«Finalmente, en 1922, Armenia se integra en la Unión Soviética. Esta
integración propició un florecimiento cultural e intelectual, así
como industrial de los armenios», asegura Marina Shamagian, armenia y
directora de la escuela hispano-rusa de altos estudios musicales de
Santiago de Compostela.

Durante la primera mitad del siglo XX, y tras la persecución turca,
fueron muchos los armenios que partieron hacia otras tierras en
calidad de refugiados. He ahí el inicio de la diáspora armenia. En la
actualidad, el número de armenios que residen fuera de su lugar de
origen es mayor que el de los que permanecen allí. La diáspora
armenia se extiende por todo el mundo. Incluso ha llegado a Galicia.

Pasado y presente

Desde 1990, y tras la desaparición de la URSS, Armenia es una nación
independiente. El genocidio ocasionó el resurgir de la conciencia
nacional del pueblo, que desde entonces lucha por el reconocimiento
mundial de lo que un día le arrebataron. Elizabeth Agopian, una
argentina de 26 años con raíces armenias, lo confirma: «Armenia ha
sido para mí, desde que recuerdo, un símbolo de lucha por la
supervivencia y la superación».

Pero la sombra del primer genocidio del siglo XX no persigue solo al
pueblo armenio. En 1987, el Parlamento Europeo pidió a Turquía que
reconociera oficialmente el genocidio como condición previa a su
ingreso en la UE. Sin embargo Ankara sigue negando los hechos.

A punto de cumplirse un siglo de la historia más triste de una
nación, los armenios reclaman el reconocimiento oficial de la
masacre, con las consecuentes compensaciones. «Lo único que
pretendemos es que se conozca la historia, que no se olvide el dolor
que nos causó en su día el intento de borrar nuestro país del mapa, y
que no se vuelva a repetir en ningún lugar», recalca Marina
Shamagian.

;TEXTO=100000068008

http://www.lavozdegalicia.es/reportajes/noticia.jsp?CAT=104&amp

Woman’s birthday brings a tearful reminder

Richmond Times Dispatch, VA
April 24 2005

Woman’s birthday brings a tearful reminder
For her, the anniversary also marks a tragic event in the history of
her forebears

BY ALBERTA LINDSEY
TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER Apr 24, 2005

Birthdays usually are happy times celebrated with parties, balloons
and decorated cakes.

Not so for Paris Dedeian, who turns 79 today.

The Richmond woman’s birthday falls on April 24, the day Armenians
around the world commemorate the anniversary of the deaths of more
than 1.5 million Armenian men, women and children.

“It’s a very solemn day,” she said.

Dedeian’s mother, Margaret, who died in November at age 98, survived
the 1915 Armenian genocide in Turkey. Margaret Dedeian lost her
parents and a brother in the genocide.

Dedeian’s father, Avedis Dedeian, came to the United States in 1913
to avoid serving in the Turkish army. His parents, brother and three
sisters died in the genocide. Margaret Dedeian was the last known
area survivor of the genocide.

“It was a sad day for my parents,” Dedeian said. “Growing up, my
birthday was always celebrated a week or so later. My brothers got
birthday cakes on their birthday.”

Several times friends have given surprise parties for Dedeian on her
birthday. One was when she turned 21 and another was when she was 70.

“They were happy occasions,” she said. “I guess they felt sorry for
me.”

Today’s birthday celebration will be quiet. Dedeian will spend most
of the day at her church, St. James Armenian Apostolic at 834 Pepper
Ave. in the West End.

The church will observe the 90th anniversary of the genocide with a
requiem service during the Divine Liturgy, which will begin at 10:30
a.m. Her mother’s name will be read during the service. A reception
and program will follow.

Dedeian’s mom never talked much about the genocide.

“Most of the people who survived were severely depressed. They
couldn’t talk about it and buried it deep inside their heart. But
some people tell horrible stories,” Dedeian said.

The Turkish government denies that the Armenian genocide ever
occurred.

“If they would only admit there was a genocide, but for 90 years they
have said it didn’t happen,” said Roxie Kricorian, whose mother was a
genocide survivor. Kricorian’s parents were Dedeian’s godparents.

“Someone said: ‘You should be forgiving.’ But how do you forgive when
they won’t say they have done anything,” Kricorian added.

Dedian said some Armenians think Turkish officials might be softening
their hard-line stance on the genocide.

“I hope to see them recognize it in my lifetime,” she said. “I hope
it never happens to anyone, never again.”

Armenia demands Turkey acknowledge ‘genocide’

News article from Australia
504/s1352254.htm

Armenia demands Turkey acknowledge ‘genocide’

Over 10,000 people have marched through the streets of
Armenia’s capital on the eve of the 90th anniversary
of mass killings by Ottoman Turks, demanding that
Turkey recognise the episode as genocide.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their kinsmen
perished in orchestrated killings between 1915 and
1917 as the Ottoman Empire, the predecessor of modern
Turkey, was disintegrating.

Ankara counters that 300,000 Armenians and thousands
of Turks were killed in “civil strife” during World
War I when Armenians rose against the Ottoman rulers
and sided with invading Russian troops.

Meanwhile, Armenian President Robert Kocharian made a
conciliatory gesture towards Ankara, saying Yerevan
would not ask for financial compensations for the
killings if Turkey recognised them as genocidal.

“We are not talking about compensations, this is only
about a moral issue,” Mr Kocharian told Russia’s
Rossiya television, which is also broadcast in
Armenia.

“There is no talk about material consequences.

“We understand that we must look towards the future,
and not the past, although that should not be
forgotten … We feel no hatred today, only sorrow
remains.”

Thousands of demonstrators, mostly young people,
marched through the centre of Yerevan, holding torches
and chanting “Armenia! Recognition!” as they proceeded
towards a memorial commemorating the 1915 slayings.

“This is not a mourning march,” one of the organisers,
Zinavor Megrian, told AFP.

“Young people are demanding that the human rights that
were violated by Turkey many years ago be reasserted,
and that Turkey recognise the genocide,” added Mr
Megrian, who also belongs to the youth organisation of
Armenia’s ruling party.

Many members of the Armenian diaspora worldwide came
to Yerevan to take part in Saturday’s march and
Sunday’s official ceremonies, at which organisers say
1.5 million participants are expected.

“This is a very important event for me, because it
allows me to express my discontent at countries that
do not recognise the genocide,” said 21-year-old Ami
Aratelian, an Armenian woman from Iran who was among
the marchers Saturday.

“The Turks who committed this crime must answer for it
not only before the Armenians, but before the whole
world,” said 16-year-old Dvin Pipizian, from Canada.

Ceremonies will begin Sunday with the laying of a
wreath at the genocide memorial, which will be
attended by Kocharian.

A mass will be celebrated later that day and a minute
of silence will be observed throughout Armenia at
7:00pm (local time).

On Tuesday Poland joined a list of 15 countries that
have officially acknowledged the killings as genocide
when its parliament passed a resolution condemning the
Armenian massacres.

The decision has already drawn protest from Ankara,
where officials called it “irresponsible” and said it
would hurt relations.

-AFP

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200

Garegin II thanked Russian State Duma for adopting Genocide Sttmt

Pan Armenian News

GAREGIN II THANKED RUSSIAN STATE DUMA FOR ADOPTING STATEMENT ON ARMENIAN
GENOCIDE

23.04.2005 04:07

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Yesterday Catholicos of All Armenians Garegin II met with
Vice-Speaker of the Russian State Duma Georgi Boos, the Press Service of the
Chancellery of Holy Echmiadzin reported. Garegin II said he was satisfied
with the State Duma adopting a statement again denouncing the Armenian
Genocide and urging the international community to commemorate the victims
of the tragic events of 1915. «We are convinced that time will come when the
concepts of genocide and war will be the history. I hope that the censure of
the Armenian Genocide will help recognize how fragile our world is,» Georgi
Boos noted. In the course of the meeting the interlocutors discussed
questions of friendly relations of the peoples of Armenia and Russia, as
well as cooperation between the Armenian Apostolic and the Russian Orthodox
Churches.

The Fairness Option

The Fairness Option

>From the April 25, 2005 issue: Listening to Democrats and reading
editorial commentary, some Americans might think that the three-fifths
Senate vote required to end debate was dictated by James Madison on his
deathbed. Hardly.

The Weekly Standard
04/25/2005
Volume 010, Issue 30
For the Editors

By Philip Terzian

The Senate Majority Leader, Bill Frist, and his Republican colleagues,
face a momentous decision: Do they allow the Democratic minority to
prevent the Senate from voting on judicial nominees, or do they invoke
the “nuclear option” — that is, change the rules so a simple majority
of 51 can force a vote?

For the past few months, Frist has been applying public pressure: first,
by routinely complaining about the Democratic filibuster against
President Bush’s nominees for the federal appellate bench; and second,
by suggesting that “all options are on the table.” Frist’s threats have
not impressed Democrats, who see no benefit in curtailing their
obstructionist tactics. From their point of view, talking nominees to
death keeps conservatives out of the federal judiciary, and weakens the
Bush administration. And Democrats argue that changing Senate rules
would injure the spirit of harmony on Capitol Hill.

Excuse us for a moment while we gag over that one. Simply stated, it is
the Democrats who have violated the standards of behavior in this
episode. They have maligned distinguished, well-qualified judges with
whom they disagree as “radical” and “outside the mainstream” of judicial
thought when it is, in fact, the Democrats who hover at the fringes of
extremism. Senate minority leader Harry Reid has a soft voice and
professorial manner, but he is an accomplished name-caller (Alan
Greenspan is “one of the biggest political hacks we have in Washington”)
and seldom hesitates to misrepresent the views of judicial nominees.
It’s impossible to reconcile the ideal of comity with summarily denying
nominees the courtesy of an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor.

That is why Frist needs to concentrate his energies, organize the
majority, and face down the challenge posed by Harry Reid and his
troops. But let’s call this “nuclear option” by its proper name: the
fairness option. Senate Democrats are the ones who have, in effect, gone
nuclear–requiring a supermajority of 60 senators to approve judges.
Listening to Democrats, and reading editorial commentary, Mr. and Mrs.
America might have gained the impression that the three-fifths Senate
vote required to end debate was dictated by James Madison on his
deathbed. Hardly. Cloture is a Senate rule, not a constitutional
requirement. It was President Woodrow Wilson, frustrated by the Senate’s
indulgence of endless talk, who promoted the adoption of Rule XXII,
mandating a two-thirds vote for cloture. Sixty years later, Senate
Democrats, led by Robert Byrd, reduced the two-thirds requirement to
three-fifths. The sacred principle of requiring 60 votes to end a
filibuster is neither an ideal of the Founders nor a historic precedent:
It is a procedural rule less than 30 years old. And, in the long history
of the United States, filibusters have never been used by a minority
systematically to block a president’s judicial nominees.

It is true that the filibuster preserves one option for the minority
against the rule of the majority party, and may allow a minority to
focus the attention of the country on momentous issues before the Senate
acts. But it is also worth noting that this procedure has not always
been used for constructive purposes. In recent times, the filibuster was
used most promiscuously to frustrate civil-rights legislation: In 1957
Strom Thurmond held the floor for 24 hours for that purpose–a record
which still stands — and in 1964, 18 Democrats and one Republican
blocked the Civil Rights Act for two-and-a-half months.

That’s the history. The politics is even more compelling. No Senate
Republican should misunderstand the Democrats’ motive in blocking the
nominations of, among others, Justice Janice Brown of the California
Supreme Court, Judge Henry Saad of the Michigan Court of Appeals, or
Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla Owen: It is power, pure and
simple. These, and other jurists, have been nominated by President Bush,
favorably evaluated by the American Bar Association, have testified
before and been endorsed by the Judiciary Committee, and await final
judgment in the Senate. If the Democrats manage to prevent a vote for
the sake of political obstruction, they will set a precedent more
momentous than a change in Senate rules.

The power of any president, Democrat or Republican, to appoint judges
would then depend not on a formal vote of the Senate, but on the consent
of 40 partisans determined to inflict maximum political damage. So the
stakes for the Bush administration could not be clearer: If Harry Reid
and the Democrats can abuse Senate rules to stop their colleagues from
voting on appellate nominees, Supreme Court appointments will be next on
the list. And which is more important: the right of any president to
appoint federal judges, and the right of nominees to a Senate vote; or
some spurious notion of “comity” on Capitol Hill?

Minute of silence to be observed on April 24

MINUTE OF SILENCE TO BE OBSERVED ON APRIL 24

Armenpress

YEREVAN, APRIL 22, ARMENPRESS: A minute of silence will be observed
at 7. pm on April 24 in Armenia, Armenian communities of Diaspora
and Nagorno Karabagh in commemoration of the 90-th anniversary of
the Armenian Genocide.

The decision was made by the National Commission for the Commemoration
of the 90-th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.