BU to Host Int’l Conf and Student Workshop on the Armenian Diaspora

Boston University to Host International Conference and Student
Workshop on the Armenian Diaspora
Asbarez
Jan 29th, 2010

BOSTON – Boston University will host an international conference and a
student workshop on the Armenian Diaspora during the weekend of
February 12. The three-day event is organized by the Charles K. and
Elisabeth M. Kenosian Chair in Modern Armenian History and Literature,
Boston University.

Armenian Diasporan communities emerged over centuries as a result of
voluntary migration and forced displacement in times of military
conflicts, the Genocide during World War I, and economic and political
crises. Featuring ten panels, the conference and the workshop will
bring together more than forty scholars to present their views and new
research on the Armenian Diaspora. They will explore a wide range of
topics, including the formation of Armenian Diaspora communities and
identities in different parts of the world, the role of the Armenian
communities in host societies, and the development of diasporic
cultures in various contexts (e.g., nationalism, transnationalism,
feminism).

Friday Program:

The student workshop will take place on Friday, February 12, from 10
a.m. to 6 p.m. at The Castle, 225 Bay State Road, Boston University.

The workshop is sponsored by the Charles K. and Elisabeth M. Kenosian
Chair in Modern Armenian History and Literature, and the International
Institute for Diaspora Studies (A Division of the Zoryan Institute).

Session 1: Diasporic Identities and Community-building
Friday, 10 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.
Chair & discussant: Simon Payaslian (Boston University)

Presenters:

Cynthia Oliphant (California State University, Fresno)
`The Effect of Organizational Structure on the Diaspora Experience’

Anna Harutyunyan (Freie Universität Berlin, Institute Of Ethnology)
`Challenging the Theory of Diaspora from the Field’

Hakem Rustom (London School Of Economics)
`The `Others’ of the Diaspora: Armenian Migration from Anatolia to France’

Session 2: Diaspora and Cultural Development
Chair: Bedross Der Matossian (MIT)
Discussant: Kevork Bardakjian (University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor)
Friday, 1:30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.

Presenters:

Lilit Keshishyan (UCLA)
`Wandering as Rule: The Diasporic Subject in Vahe Berberian’s Namakner Zaataren’

Marie-Blanche Fourcade (Université De Montréal)
`Heritage Challenges in Diaspora: How to Preserve, to Share and to
Pass Down? The Case Study of the Quebec Armenian Community’

Stephanie Stockdale (Thunderbird School Of Global Management)
`Cultural & Social Factors of the Armenian and Jewish Diasporas of
Argentina: A Comparative Study’

Session 3: Transnationalism, Nationalism, and Conflict
Friday, 4 p.m. – 6 p.m.
Chair: Richard G. Hovannisian (UCLA)
Discussant: Asbed Kotchikian (Bentley University)

Presenters:

Stepan Stepanyan (Fletcher School Of Law And Diplomacy, Tufts University)
`The Armenian Community of Georgia as a Factor of Security in the
South Caucasus Region’

Anush Bezhanyan (University Of South Carolina)
`Iraqi Armenians after the Toppling of Saddam Hussein: Emigration or
Repatriation’

Katherine Casey (University Of Chicago)
`Agree to Disagree: The Incompatible Nationalisms of Armenia and Its Diaspora’

Lorand Poosz (Bolyai University)
`Data Concerning the Transylvanian Armenian Community’s Response to
the Armenian Genocide’

Saturday-Sunday Program

The conference will take place on Saturday, February 13, from 9 a.m.
to 6:30 p.m., and on Sunday, February 14, from 9:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. On
both days the conference will be held at the School of Management,
Auditorium-Room 105, 595 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston University.

The conference is sponsored by the Charles K. and Elisabeth M.
Kenosian Chair in Modern Armenian History and Literature, the
International Institute for Diaspora Studies (A Division of the Zoryan
Institute), and the National Association for Armenian Studies and
Research, Belmont, Mass.

Saturday Program

Session 4: Diasporic Identity, Human Rights, and Genocide
Saturday, 9 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.
Chair: Simon Payaslian (Boston University)
Discussant: George Shirinian (Zoryan Institute)

Presenters:

Nanor Kebranian (Kenderian) (Columbia University)
`Can the Armenian Diaspora Speak? Diasporic Identity in the Shadow of
Human Rights’

Joyce Apsel (New York University)
`Teaching the Armenian Genocide in North America: New Resources,
Programs, and Integration within Genocide Studies’

Rubina Peroomian (UCLA)
`The Third-Generation Armenian-American Writers Echo the Quest for
Self-Identity with the Genocide at Its Core’

Session 5: Narrativization of Diasporic Belongingness and Revival
Saturday, 10:30 a.m. – noon
Discussant: Khachig Tölölyan (Wesleyan University)
Chair: Marc Mamigonian (NAASR)

Presenters:

Susan Pattie (University College London)
`Constructing Narratives of Belonging among Armenians in the Diaspora’

Sebouh Aslanian (Cornell University)
`Networks of Circulation, Patronage, and `National Revival’: The
Armenian Translation of Charles Rollin’s History of Rome’

Sona Haroutyunian (Ca’ Foscari University Of Venice)
`Vittoria Aganoor’s Alter Ego’

Session 6: Armenian Repatriations 1946-1949: Contexts, Experiences, Aftermaths
Saturday, 1:30 p.m. – 3:45 p.m.
Chair & Discussant: Susan Pattie (University College London)

Presenters:

Sevan Yousefian (UCLA)
`Picnics for Repatriates’

Astrig Atamian (Inalco, Paris)
`Armenia, here we come! The French Armenian Communists during the Repatriations’

Kari Neely (Middle Tennessee State University)
`Kevork Ajemian’s Use of Middle Eastern Armenian Repatriation in `A
Perpetual Path’ ‘

Session 7: Desnelle Collective
Saturday, 4 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
Chair: Hrayr Anmahouni/Eulmessekian (La Crescenta, Calif.)
Discussant: David Kazanjian (University Of Pennsylvania)

Presenters:

Helin Anahit (Middlesex University, London)
`Diaspora Landscapes as a Thought Model’

Emily Artinian (Chelsea College Of Art & Design, London)
`From Ararat to Anywhere?’

Christopher Atamian (New York)
`Thinking the Past: Restorative and Reflective Nostalgia in Frounze
Dovlatian’s `Garod”

Charles Garoian (Penn State School Of Visual Arts)
`Scattered Flesh / Tservadz Mort’

Neery Melkonian (New York)
`A Feminism that is Often Accented, Sometimes Whispers, Even Stutters:
Modern and Contemporary Armenian Women Artists in Transnational
Contexts’

Abelina Galustian (University Of California, Santa Barbara)
`The Substance of Orientalism in Visual Representation’

Sunday Program

Session 8: Culture & Economy in Diasporan Communities
Sunday, 9:30 a.m. – noon
Chair: George Shirinian (Zoryan Institute)
Discussant: Marc Mamigonian (NAASR)

Presenters:

Aida Boudjikanian (Montreal)
`The Armenian Jewelers’ Niche of Montreal: Between a Local Trait and
an Armenian Diasporic Tradition’

Gregory Aftandilian (Washington)
`Re-cementing Kinship Ties: Armenian-American Soldiers and the French
Armenian Community during World War II’

Philippe Videlier (Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique, Lyons)
`Armenians and Turks in France Confronting the Genocide’

Matthias Fritz (State Linguistic V. Brusov University, Yerevan)
`The Evolution of the Armenian Diaspora in Germany during the Past Two Decades’

Session 9: Transdisciplinarity of Diaspora Studies
Sunday, 1 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Chair: Richard G. Hovannisian (UCLA)
Discussant: Khachig Tölölyan (Wesleyan University)

Presenters:

Daniel Douglas And Anny Bakalian (CUNY)
`Armenians in the United States: A Quantitative Analysis Using the
American Community Survey’

Carel Bertram (San Francisco State University)
`Diasporic Armenians as Pilgrims to Their Family Towns and Villages’

Joan Bamberger (Anthropologist, Watertown, Mass.)
`Re-Generation of Armenian Arts in Watertown, Massachusetts’

Nikol Margaryan (Yerevan State University)
`Anthroponyms in the Context of Ethnic Identity’

Session 10: Diasporan Ethnonationalism and Transnationalism
Sunday, 3:45 p.m. – 6 p.m.
Chair: Asbed Kotchikian (Bentley University)
Discussant: Bedross Der Matossian (MIT)

Presenters:

Ara Sanjian (University Of Michigan-Dearborn)
`Limits of Conflict and Consensus among Lebanese-Armenian Political
Factions in the Early 21st Century’

Vartan Matiossian (Hovnanian School, New Jersey)
`Domino Effect: U.S. Immigration Policies and the Formation of the
Armenian Communities in Latin America’

Ohannes Geukjian (American University Of Beirut)
`Armenia-Diaspora Intransigence in Light of Armenian-Turkish Relations
and the Resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, 1991-Present’

Both the workshop and the conference are open to the public, and
admission is free.

Founded in 1839, Boston University is an internationally recognized
institution of higher education and research. With more than 30,000
students, it is the fourth largest independent university in the
United States. BU consists of 17 colleges and schools along with a
number of multi-disciplinary centers and institutes that are central
to the school’s research and teaching mission.

EBRD Supports Private Businesses In Armenia

EBRD SUPPORTS PRIVATE BUSINESSES IN ARMENIA

penki.lt
1/29/2010

The EBRD is increasing the availability of financing to private
businesses in Armenia with a $5 million credit line and a $3 million
trade finance facility to ArmSwissBank for small and medium companies
(SMEs).

Established in 2004, ArmSwissBank is a dynamically growing financial
institution, operating as a private, corporate and investment bank,
with a strong emphasis on brokerage services and liquidity management
for Armenia’s financial sector.

The EBRD financing will diversify ArmSwissBank’s funding base and
support its strategy to develop its SME lending activities. The
proceeds of the EBRD credit line will be on-lent to small and medium
entrepreneurs in Armenia.

In addition the EBRD is extending a $3 million trade finance facility
to ArmSwissBank under its Trade Facilitation Programme (TFP), which
will allow ArmSwissBank to enhance the support provided to local
import-export oriented companies by guaranteeing their international
trade finance and factoring obligations and providing pre-export and
post-export financing, as well as financing of working capital needed
to conclude foreign trade contracts, and other facilities.

"The EBRD is pleased to support the further development of
ArmSwissBank, an important player in the Armenian banking sector,
which is contributing to the diversification of the country’s financial
infrastructure. This transaction will help increase the availability
of much-needed financing for small and medium private companies in
Armenia and will offer a boost to the development of capital markets
in the country", said Valeriu Razlog, Head of EBRD Office in Armenia.

The EBRD loan is part of the Bank’s Armenia Multi-Bank Framework
Facility II, aimed at supporting the increase of financial
intermediation in Armenia through medium-term credit lines to local
commercial banks for on-lending to commercial customers. Since the
facility was launched in 2006, over $110 million was disbursed to 11
banks operating in Armenia.

The EBRD’s Trade Facilitation Program involves over 120 issuing banks
in 20 of the EBRD’s countries of operation, including 7 in Armenia,
as well as around 720 confirming banks around the world. To date
the Bank has financed over 290 trade finance transactions with total
amount of more than $25 million under the TFP in Armenia.

Overall, since the beginning of its operations in Armenia, the EBRD
has committed over ~@335 million in approximately 70 projects in the
financial, corporate, infrastructure and energy sectors.

BAKU: Azerbaijani Scientist: Secret Documents Prove That Stepan Shau

AZERBAIJANI SCIENTIST: SECRET DOCUMENTS PROVE THAT STEPAN SHAUMIAN WAS MEMBER OF BAKU COMMITTEE OF ARF

Trend News Agency
29.01.2010 13:10

The secret document argue that Armenian nationalist Stepan Shaumian was
a member of the Baku Committee of Armenian Revolutionary Federation
(ARF) Dashnaktsutyun Party, said Yagub Mahmudov, the Director of the
Azerbaijani National Academy of Sciences’ (NASA) Institute of History.

According to him, the archival material on the activities of the 26
Baku commissars were discovered the secret telegrams and documents
showing that, after Sept.20, 1918 – the day of the shooting of the
Baku commissars – surviving Shaumian kept in the Krasnovodsk prison,
receiving rations and 17 rubles for 10 days.

The new material collected in Makhmudov’s book titled "Genocide
against Azerbaijanis in March 1918."

Armenia’s Constitutional Court Upholds Legality Of North-South Trans

ARMENIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT UPHOLDS LEGALITY OF NORTH-SOUTH TRANSPORT CORRIDOR INVESTMENT PROGRAM

ARKA
Jan 28, 2010

YEREVAN, January 28, /ARKA/. Armenia’s Constitutional Court has upheld
the legality of an investment program designed to fund construction
of the North-South transport corridor, the ministry of economy said
in a statement.

It said the Court ruled that Armenia’s commitments in a framework
agreement signed with the Asian Development Bank on September 15, 2009
are in conformity with the country’s Constitution. The Court handed
a similar ruling with respect to a credit agreement signed by the
government of Armenia and the Asian Development Bank on October 12,
2009 for the initial phase of the project. The Armenian government
approved the investment program on January 14, 2010.

Armenian transport and communications minister Gurgen Sarkisian
said late in December that the construction of the first phase of
North-South Road Corridor will be launched in 2010 April. The project
will be funded by the initial loan of $60 million, earmarked by the
Asia Development Bank to reconstruct an 18 kilometer section of the
road corridor between the capital city Yerevan, and Ashtarak to the
north, and improve safety of Yerevan to Ararat road to the south.

Last year the Asian Development Bank (ADB) said it will extend up to
$500 million to Armenia to upgrade its main corridor road as part of
a broader thrust to improve connectivity, and boost trade, growth and
livelihood opportunities in the Caucasus and Central Asia subregions.

Funds will be released periodically through a multitranche financing
facility. The transport corridor will stretch from the southern
Armenian town of Meghri, on the border with Iran, to Bavra in the
north on the border with Georgia.

The project, which the minister said, is estimated preliminary to
cost $962 million, is to be over in 2106. In the second phase which
is expected to be over in 2010, a road from Ashtarak to Gyumri will
be reconstructed. In the third phase a new road from Goris to Kapan
will be constructed.

"This is a very important project for Armenia, because it is a
regional project that will connect the southern parts of Armenia with
Georgian seaports on the Black Sea and will cut the travel by 30%,’
the minister said.

Responsible Phase In Karabakh Issue

RESPONSIBLE PHASE IN KARABAKH ISSUE

Lragir.am
28/01/10

The settlement of the Karabakh issue has really embraced a responsible
phase. This opinion was expressed on January 28 by the head of the
union of political scientists Hmayak Hovhannisyan.

He said that this preamble is the frameworks agreement which has
much been dwelt recently. And it really contains a point about the
Karabakh participation in the negotiation as a full party and this
is really a serious achievement, says Hmayak Hovhannisyan.

According to him, the argument that it was present still in 1994 is
not so true because at that time the point was about the Armenian
and Azerbaijani communities of Karabakh. Hmayak Hovhannisyan says
that during those years he used to be an expert at the Russian State
Duma and got "top secret" information from the ministry of foreign
affairs and learnt about the process of negotiations. But the current
government does not show him this honor.

Hmayak Hovhannisyan says that the fact that the options of
self-determination of nations and the territorial integrity are
equalized is impermissible. According to him, this is what the
Azerbaijani government says: good autonomy within the Azerbaijani
composition.

According to him, the principle of self-determination of a nation is a
sacred principle and the territorial integrity is not a "holy cow" but
it appeared after the Helsinki act in result of West-USSR bargaining.

According to Hovhannisyan, it is wrong to consider these two principles
equal.

‘The International Center For Human Development’ – Armenia Rated Amo

‘THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT’ – ARMENIA RATED AMONG TOP 50 INTERNATIONAL ANALYTICAL CENTERS WORLDWIDE

Panorama.am
18:57 26/01/2010

"The International Center for Human Development" – Armenia ranks among
Top 50 international analytical centers in the UN rating table issued
recently. Azerbaijan is missing.

Brookings Institution in Washington tops the table. It specializes
in social, political and economic sciences. "Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace" and "Council on Foreign Relations" have also
been recognized as important analytical centers.

Besides the American centers, Top 10 includes the British Chatham
House, German Transparency International, Belgian International Crisis
Group, French Institute of International Relations, Swedish Stockholm
International Peace Research Institute, British Amnesty International,
International Institute for Strategic Studies and Adam Smith Institute,
Belgian Centre for European Policy Studies, and German Institute for
International and Security Affairs.

The US leads with 1/3 analytical centers worldwide. China comes second.

Director General: Armenian Ameriabank Plans To Open Three New Branch

DIRECTOR GENERAL: ARMENIAN AMERIABANK PLANS TO OPEN THREE NEW BRANCHES IN 2010

ARKA
Jan 26, 2010

YEREVAN, January 26. /ARKA/. Armenian Ameriabank is going to open three
new branches in 2010, Artak Hanesyan, director general of Ameriabank
CJSC, said Tuesday at a press conference.

He said one of these branches will be opened in Dilijan. "The
construction of the office is already over, and its registration is
under way now."

Hanesyan said that the opening ceremony is scheduled for March 5.

The second of the three branches will be opened in Gyumri or Vanadzor –
one of these two cities will be chosen.

"I want to stress that the city not chosen this time will have a
branch the next year," the director general of Ameriabank said.

He said that the bank plans to open another branch in Yerevan for
serving individuals.

"This branch will serve individuals, since the number of clients
significantly increased in 2009."

The number of Ameriabank’s clients grew 57% in 2009 to 13,100, of
which 11,700 are individuals.

In 2009, the bank opened two branches – in Kajaran and Yerevan.

The Ameriabank CJSC (former Armimpexbank) was founded in July 1992
using the facilities of the Armenian branch of the USSR Vnesheconombank
(Foreign Economy Bank). On September 8, 1992, the bank received its
license from the Central Bank of Armenia.

In August 2007, TDA Holdings Limited, affiliated with Troika Dialogue,
Russia’s leading investment company, purchased the bank’s shares.

According to ARKA News Agency’s data, Ameriabank’s assets reached
AMD 103.5 billion by late December and liabilities totaled AMD 81.8
billion.

The bank’s total capital amounted to AMD 21.7 billion and authorized
capital AMD 18.2 billion (the largest in Armenian banking system).

Ameriabank’s credit portfolio amounted to AMD 54.1 billion and
liabilities to clients totaled AMD 69.1 billion by late December.

The bank’s 2009 net profit amounted to AMD 1.5 billion.

($1 = AMD 377.71).

Any Euphoria On Karabakh Conflict Settlement Perspectives Premature

ANY EUPHORIA ON KARABAKH CONFLICT SETTLEMENT PERSPECTIVES PREMATURE

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.01.2010 16:15 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia-Azerbaijan-Russia presidential summit
in Sochi is unlikely to yield significant results or change the
situation with Karabakh, Alexey Malashenko , an expert at Carnegie
Moscow Center said.

Sill, according to him, Sochi meeting can’t be characterized as formal
or meaningless. As Alexey Malashenko noted, compromise approach
capable of helping the negotiation process out of standstill could
be developed.

"Hopes for development of compromise approach were linked to activation
of Ankara’s foreign policy and Armenia-Turkey rapprochement process. In
Switzerland, Armenia and Turkey signed Protocols on opening of border
and establishment of diplomatic relations. In exchange, Turkey expected
Yerevan to make concessions," he said.

According to Malashenko, Russia, pursuing personal interests, became
immediately involved in the new game. "Beside Karabakh conflict
settlement, Moscow is interested in intensification of economic
relations with Turkey. Russia aims to accelerate construction of
South Stream pipeline to transport Russian natural gas Europe."

"Yet Armenia’s position against Turkey-Russia rapprochement served as a
reminder of any euphoria on Karabakh conflict settlement perspectives
being premature. In this connection, Moscow had to persuade its
strategic partner of the necessity to show more flexibility in Karabakh
issue. Yet, Yerevan’s unexpected persistence came to question both
Armenia-Turkey rapprochement and hopes for any progress on Karabakh
issue," Kommersant quoted the expert as saying.

Moscow realizes that its involvement in Karabakh conflict settlement
is one of the decisive factors for Russia’s presence in Caucasus,
he concluded.

The conflict between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan broke out in
1988 as result of the ethnic cleansing the latter launched in the
final years of the Soviet Union. The Karabakh War was fought from
1991 to 1994. Since the ceasefire in 1994, sealed by Armenia, Nagorno
Karabakh and Azerbaijan, most of Nagorno Karabakh and several regions
of Azerbaijan around it (the security zone) remain under the control
of NKR defense army. Armenia and Azerbaijan are holding peace talks
mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group up till now.

The Protocols aimed at normalization of bilateral ties and opening of
the border between Armenia and Turkey were signed in Zurich by Armenian
Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and his Turkish counterpart Ahmet
Davutoglu on October 10, 2009, after a series of diplomatic talks
held through Swiss mediation.

On January 12, 2010, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of
Armenia found the protocols conformable to the country’s Organic Law.

David Harutyunyan Wins Bronze At Georgian Chess Championship

DAVID HARUTYUNYAN WINS BRONZE AT GEORGIAN CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.01.2010 21:03 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Grand master David Harutyunyan won a bronze medal
at Georgian Chess Championship, scoring 8,5 points out of 10 possible.

David Harutyunyan was only 0,5 points behind grand masters Merab
Gagunashvili and Tamaz Gelashvili, who shared 1st and 2nd places at
the tournament.

FM does not rule out failure of Armenian-Turkish normalization

Edward Nalbandian does not rule out failure of Armenian-Turkish normalization

YEREVAN, JANUARY 22, NOYAN TAPAN. If Turkey is not prepared to head
for the protocols’ ratification and it continues to use a language of
preconditions, then it is not ruled out that the Armenia-Turkey
normalization process will meet with failure. In case of failure,
Turkey’s efforts to shift the responsibility onto Armenia will not be
comprehended by the international community. Armenian Foreign Minister
Edward Nalbandian stated this at the January 22 press conference to
summarize the foreign policy in 2009.

As for the Turkish side’s claims that the RA Constitutional Court’s
decision contains preconditions and contradicts the provisions and
goals of the protocols signed on October 10 and that the Armenian side
has made some changes in the protocols, E. Nalbandian said that these
claims "do not correspond to reality". "We hope that Turks will not
attempt to use some artificial, invented pretexts as a reason for not
ratifying these protocols," E. Nalbandian said.

In response to the question about whether adoption of a document on
the Artsakh conflict is possible in 2010, the foreign minister
replied: "It is difficult to say what will happen in 2010. If the
Azerbaijani side shows a more constructive approach, progress is
possible. However, I wouldn’t say that a sudden change may occur in
the next 2 months."