Thursday, U.S. Senate Adopts ‘Armenian Protection Act of 2023’ The United States Capitol The United States Senate has adopted a bill that would suspend all military aid to Azerbaijan by repealing the Freedom Support Act Section 907 waiver authority for the Administration with respect to assistance to Azerbaijan for fiscal years 2024 or 2025. The short title of the bill (S.3000) introduced by Senator Gary Peters (D-MI) is the “Armenian Protection Act of 2023.” The bill passed on November 15 will be introduced in the House of Representatives, then, if passed, presented to the United States president for signing to become a law. Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act passed along with the adoption of the legislation in 1992 bans any kind of direct United States aid to the Azerbaijani government. In subsequent years, however, American lawmakers amended Section 907 to allow presidents to provide military assistance to Azerbaijan for counterterrorism operations. The adoption of the Armenian Protection Act of 2023 came amid a congressional hearing on “the future of Nagorno-Karabakh” held the same day. Speaking to members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Europe, James O’Brien, assistant secretary at the U.S. State Department’s Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, said that Washington “made clear that nothing will be normal with Azerbaijan after the events of September 19 until we see progress on the peace track.” The official referred to Baku’s one-day military operation in Nagorno-Karabakh as a result of which virtually the entire local Armenian population – more than 100,000 people – fled to Armenia. O’Brien said that Washington canceled a number of high-level visits to Azerbaijan in response to that action and that “we don’t anticipate submitting a waiver on Section 907 until such time that we see a real improvement.” Azerbaijan reacted angrily to the remarks by the U.S. State Department official that its Foreign Ministry described as a blow to relations between the two countries. It said that Baku would, therefore, not send a delegation to Washington for talks between the foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia around a peace agreement that it said were planned for November 20. Baku Snubs Washington Over Remarks By U.S. Official The building of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan in Baku (file photo). Official Baku has refused to hold an Armenian-Azerbaijani meeting in Washington after remarks by a senior United States official regarded in Azerbaijan as “a blow to relations.” Azerbaijan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement on Thursday describing some of the statements made by James O’Brien, assistant secretary at the U.S. State Department’s Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, as “one-sided” and “biased.” “A one-sided approach by the United States could lead to the loss by Washington of its role as a mediator,” the ministry said, as quoted by Azerbaijan’s APA news agency. “Under these circumstances, it is important to note that we do not consider possible to hold the proposed meeting at the level of the foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia in Washington on November 20, 2023,” it added. Addressing the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Europe during a November 15 hearing on “the future of Nagorno-Karabakh,” O’Brien said that Washington “made clear that nothing will be normal with Azerbaijan after the events of September 19 until we see progress on the peace track.” He referred to Baku’s one-day military operation in Nagorno-Karabakh as a result of which virtually the entire local Armenian population – more than 100,000 people – fled to Armenia. O’Brien said that Washington canceled a number of high-level visits to Azerbaijan in response to that action and that “we don’t anticipate submitting a waiver on Section 907 until such time that we see a real improvement.” Section 907 of the United States’ 1992 Freedom Support Act bans any kind of direct United States aid to the Azerbaijani government. The U.S. official also warned Azerbaijan against using force to open a land corridor to its western exclave of Nakhichevan via Armenia. “A transit corridor created some other way – by force or with the involvement of Iran – will, I think, be met with a very strong reaction and will not be a success,” O’Brien said, in particular. In its commentary the Azerbaijani Ministry of Foreign Affairs spoke about reciprocal steps by Baku after the U.S. official’s statements. “Concerning the statement that the U.S. has cancelled high-level bilateral meetings and engagements, which were initiated by the U.S. with Azerbaijan, and that there cannot be “business as usual” in our bilateral relationship,” it should be noted that the relations could not be one-sided. Consequently, the same approach will be applied equally by Azerbaijan. In these circumstances, we consider the possibility of high-level visits from the United States to Azerbaijan inappropriate as well,” the Azerbaijani ministry said. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev had withdrawn from multilateral talks involving Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian that were scheduled to take place on the margins of the European Union’s October 5 summit in Granada, Spain. Pashinian had hoped that the sides there would sign a document laying out the main parameters of an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty. Baku explained its refusal to attend the meeting in Granada by the attitude of France that has been supplying Armenia with weapons recently. The Azerbaijani leader also appears to have cancelled another meeting which EU Council President Charles Michel planned to host in Brussels later in October. Earlier this week, Armenian officials said Yerevan was ready for talks with Baku both in Brussels and Washington. Meanwhile, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell said on Thursday that Brussels continues to make efforts to restart negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan without delay. He said that the ultimate goal of the negotiation process is the conclusion of a peace treaty between Azerbaijan and Armenia. U.S. Official Says Next Few Weeks ‘Critical’ In Armenia-Azerbaijan Talks • Heghine Buniatian James O’Brien (file photo) The coming weeks will be critical in negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, a U.S. State Department official told a congressional hearing on November 15. James O’Brien, assistant secretary at the department’s Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, said that Washington is pursuing a peace agreement between Yerevan and Baku as he spoke to members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s Subcommittee on Europe meeting on the subject of “the future of Nagorno-Karabakh.” “The next few weeks will be critical in testing the parties’ willingness to go from good intentions to saying “yes”, because we all know that “yes” is the hardest word to get in a negotiation,” he said. The U.S. diplomat did not say what specific agreements were on the table. He only emphasized that Washington remains “deeply engaged.” “We’ve made clear that nothing will be normal with Azerbaijan after the events of September 19 until we see progress on the peace track. So we’ve canceled a number of high-level visits, condemned the actions… We don’t anticipate submitting a waiver on Section 907 until such time that we see a real improvement,” O’Brien said in reference to Baku’s military operation in Nagorno-Karabakh that resulted in the virtually entire local Armenian population fleeing their homes and moving to Armenia. As for Azerbaijan’s demands that Armenia give it a land corridor to its western exclave of Nakhichevan, the U.S. diplomat said that it is Washington’s position that “no use of force is acceptable.” “A transit corridor built with the involvement and consent of Armenia can be a tremendous boom to states across the region and the global markets that will receive access to these goods. A transit corridor created some other way – by force or with the involvement of Iran – will, I think, be met with a very strong reaction and will not be a success. That’s a simple choice,” he said. O’Brien said that Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, with whom he had a meeting in Paris last week, “seems willing to take chances for peace.” “The question really is whether [Azerbaijani] President [Ilham] Aliyev is willing to do that. And he has said he is. So now is the moment, because the challenge always for a power that feels stronger – and I think it’s fair to say Azerbaijan feels that it has the oil and gas revenues, the relationships, the ability to have some options – the challenge is always when it’s time to cash the options in and commit to one path for the future,” he said, adding that the United States is also “talking a lot with Turkey,” a close ally of Azerbaijan, on that matter. “We’re trying to lay out a path that makes clear the benefits that come from peace and the costs that come with choosing to wait further. And really the decision will be on whether he [Aliyev] says “yes” or “not”, and we want that to happen in the next few weeks,” he said. According to O’Brian, peace will enable Armenia and Azerbaijan to reduce the influence of Russia and Iran in the region, on the other hand, to increase cooperation with the West. Pashinian Says Mutual Distrust Stalls Signing Of Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Deal • Ruzanna Stepanian Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian addressing parliament (file photo) Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian has cited mutual distrust as the main factor stalling the signing of a peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan as he addressed a parliament session in Yerevan on Thursday. Speaking on next year’s budget, Pashinian said that it will more than double the amount of spending on the military as compared to 2018 when his government first came to power. But at the same time he gave assurances that the increase in military spending will be “in preparation for peace rather than war.” According to Pashinian, citizens’ feeling secure is the most important guarantee of peace and stability. “I am sure that all our neighbors are convinced that we have no intention of attacking anyone, and in that regard, I do not consider the concerns expressed about the acquisitions by our armed forces to be sincere. It is the duty of every sovereign nation to strengthen its army, which is something that we are doing. In the last 10 years Azerbaijan’s defense spending was on the average three times higher than Armenia’s and continues to be such,” he said. Recently, in presenting an increase in his country’s military budget, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev stated that they “have to increase the military budget to a record level, because even after Armenia’s defeat in the war we see danger from it.” In this view Pashinian said that while Armenia and Azerbaijan have basically agreed on key principles, the lack of trust between the two countries remains the main reason why the signing of a peace agreement is being stalled. “Because every time we see in the statements and certain actions of Azerbaijan, and, perhaps, Azerbaijan sees in our statements and some of our actions, intentions to abandon these arrangements and plan aggressive actions, which has a negative impact on the text version of the peace agreement,” Pashinian said. Pashinian also stressed that Yerevan’s political will to sign a peace agreement with Azerbaijan in the coming months remains “unshakable”, but said that there were a number of issues to clarify. “One is the formulation of a mechanism for overcoming possible misinterpretations of the content of the peace agreement, the other is the creation of security guarantees so that no escalation be possible after the signing of the peace agreement,” he said. Pashinian emphasized again that key principles have been agreed upon with Azerbaijan, saying that it happened during negotiations, in particular, during the tripartite meetings held in Brussels on May 14 and July 15 of this year. The Armenian prime minister laid down these principles: “Armenia and Azerbaijan recognize each other’s territorial integrity, with the understanding that the territory of Armenia is 29, 800 square kilometers, and the territory of Azerbaijan is 86,600 square kilometers. The Alma-Ata Declaration of 1991 is a political basis for border delimitation between Armenia and Azerbaijan. In fact, there is an understanding that the maps of the General Staff of the USSR Armed Forces from 1974 to 1990 should be used for border delimitation. Armenia and Azerbaijan have no territorial claims to each other and undertake not to advance such claims in the future either. Regional transport links should be reopened on the basis of sovereignty, jurisdiction, reciprocity and equality of the countries.” Armenia Reaffirms Willingness To Take Part In Trilateral Meeting In Brussels Armenia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Vahan Kostanian (L) and Deputy Secretary General/Political Director of the European External Action Service Enrique Mora, Brussels, . Armenia has reaffirmed its willingness to take part in trilateral talks with Azerbaijan in Brussels to be held with the mediation of European Council President Charles Michel as the second high-level Armenia-EU Political and Security Dialogue session took place in the Belgian capital on Wednesday. The meeting co-chaired by Armenia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Vahan Kostanian and Deputy Secretary General/Political Director of the European External Action Service Enrique Mora, “confirmed the mutual interest of Armenia and the EU to further enhance political dialogue and cooperation in the areas of foreign, security and defense policy.” “The EU reiterated its unequivocal support to the sovereignty, territorial integrity (29,800 square kilometers) and inviolability of borders of Armenia and welcomed Armenia’s readiness for closer cooperation with the European Union,” a joint press release issued by the parties said. “The unacceptability of the use, or the threat of use of force, was strongly highlighted. The parties stressed the absolute necessity of establishing durable peace and stability in the South Caucasus,” it added. According to Armenia’s Foreign Ministry, “the EU expressed support to the normalization of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan based on the principles of mutual recognition of territorial integrity and inviolability of borders based on the 1991 Almaty Declaration, border delimitation based on relevant USSR General Staff maps that have been provided to the sides, and the unblocking of regional communications based on respect for the sovereignty and jurisdiction of either country, on the basis of reciprocity and equality.” Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev were scheduled to meet on the fringes of the EU’s October 5 summit in Granada, Spain. Pashinian had hoped that they would sign there a document laying out the main parameters of an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty. However, Aliyev withdrew from the talks at the last minute. He also appears to have cancelled another meeting which EU Council President Michel planned to host in Brussels later in October. Secretary of Armenia’s Security Council Armen Grigorian recently met with Toivo Klaar, the EU’s special representative for the South Caucasus, and also confirmed that Armenia is ready to continue negotiations with Azerbaijan in the format proposed by Brussels. A senior EU official told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service last week that Michel and other EU representatives were holding separate discussions with Yerevan and Baku in an effort to reschedule the trilateral meeting for December. Although no agreement has been reached so far, the summit may take place next month, said the official who did not want to be identified. At the second high-level session of the Armenia-EU Political and Security Dialogue the parties also discussed the possibility of extension of the EU’s border-monitoring mission in Armenia, as well as “non-lethal support to Armenia through the European Peace Facility.” The parties said that the rights and security of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians, including their right to return, should be ensured. The first session of the Armenia-EU Political and Security Dialogue took place in Yerevan in January. Its next session is also due to take place in Yerevan in 2024. West Accused Of ‘Trying To Tear Armenia Away From Russia’ Maria Zakharova, an official representative of the Foreign Ministry of Russia (file photo) A senior Russian official has accused the West of “trying to tear Armenia away” from Moscow, drawing parallels between Ukraine and the South Caucasus nation. “The West has a beastly grip on Armenia after it failed its policy in Ukraine,” Maria Zakharova, an official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said during a press briefing on Wednesday. “The West, whose plans in the Ukrainian direction have completely failed, has grabbed onto Armenia with the same beastly grip, trying to tear it away from Russia,” she continued. Zakharova referred to the latest steps of the Armenian leadership, including Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s refusal to attend an upcoming summit of the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization in Minsk, the expansion of Western arms supplies to Armenia, and “the friendship of Yerevan and Kyiv” as to “links of the same chain.” “Only, it seems to me that this is a chain of enslavement,” the Russian diplomatic representative said. Zakharova further claimed that it is “recommendations from the West” that prevent the Armenian leadership from completing the work on unblocking transport links in the South Caucasus. She noted that representatives of Moscow, Yerevan and Baku involved in a trilateral working group achieved “significant progress” in June regarding the restoration of a railway link between Armenia and Azerbaijan. “But again, something prevented the Armenian leadership from finalizing the agreements on paper. We know very well what prevented it – it was the “good” advice of the Western friends of the current leadership in Armenia,” Zakharova said. The official representative of Russia’s Foreign Ministry denied any pressure on Armenia in the matter, but reminded that under the 2020 and 2021 trilateral agreements it is Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) that is to exercise control over transport links between Azerbaijan and its Nakhichevan exclave that would pass via Armenia. Officials in Yerevan have not concealed their frustration with Russia, considering that as a formal ally it has failed to fulfill its obligation to Armenia to secure its borders and protect its sovereign territory against incursions by Azerbaijan. Tensions between Armenia and Russia rose further after Azerbaijan’s September 19-20 military offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh that led to the exodus of the region’s virtually entire ethnic Armenian population. Armenia, in particular, blamed Russian peacekeepers deployed in Nagorno-Karabakh under the 2020 ceasefire agreement between Moscow, Baku and Yerevan for failing to protect the local Armenians. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian defended the policy of his government aimed at “diversifying security relations” as he spoke in parliament on Wednesday. “We are looking for other security partners. And we are looking for and finding other security partners, we are trying to sign contracts, acquire some armaments. This is our policy,” the Armenian leader said. Despite the provision in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire agreement that Russia’s FSB is to exercise control over future “transport communications” via Armenia, it is increasingly being viewed in Yerevan as a moot point given the failure of the Moscow-brokered deal to protect ethnic Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh. In their public statements officials in Yerevan have insisted that it is the Armenian side only that should exercise control over all transport links passing through Armenian territories. The Armenian government recently set up a special unit at the National Security Service tasked with ensuring the safe transit of people, goods and other cargo through the country. Zakharova said that the latest reaction of Armenian authorities to the matter came as a surprise to her. “Russian border guards have been protecting Armenia’s borders with Iran and Turkey for many years in accordance with bilateral agreements,” she said. Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc. 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
Author: Lena Karagyozian
Russia’s decision to open consulate in Kapan contains political component – Armenian Deputy FM
13:47, 3 November 2023
YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 3, ARMENPRESS. Russia’s decision to open a consulate-general in Kapan, Syunik province contains a political component, Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Paruyr Hovhannisyan has said.
“The message is the same from all countries, to be represented given various circumstances,” he said when asked on the message of Russia’s move. “Countries open consulates taking into account the town, economic interests and political interests. It’s the same circumstances as with Iran,” Hovhannisyan said, referring to the opening of the Iranian consulate in Syunik.
France has made a similar announcement.
“The establishment of a consulate-general also contains a political component. But this is about de-centralized cooperation, economic interests, relevant possible energy and transport programs. The political component is definitely there. It means that there is interest towards any given region, with all its consequences. This is a sign of interest,” Hovhannisyan said.
Prime Minister Pashinyan meets Georgian counterpart in Tbilisi
15:09,
YEREVAN, OCTOBER 26, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has met with Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Garibashvili in Tbilisi.
Pashinyan and Garibashvili discussed “issues related to the Armenian-Georgian cooperation agenda, including bilateral economic relations”, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a readout.
The processes taking place in the region were also discussed.
The Armenian and Georgian prime ministers attached importance to the implementation of sustained steps in the direction of peace and stability, the Prime Minister’s Office said.
Iran’s president says foreign intervention is harmful to the Azeri-Armenian conflict
Recommendation to “refrain from intervention for peace and stability in the Caucasus region”
Raisi meets separately with foreign ministers of both countries in Tehran to mediate
Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi said on the 23rd (local time) that for peace and stability in the Caucasus region, a disputed area between Armenia and Azerbaijan, foreign intervention could be “very harmful” and that regional issues should be resolved through dialogue and cooperation between the parties. He emphasized that
According to Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency, the President’s Office said that President Raisi made these remarks during separate meetings with the foreign ministers of the two countries who visited Tehran.
He told Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan, “Iran has a great interest in the security of the countries in the Caucasus region and recognizes its importance,” and said that Iran would take action in resolving the problems between the two countries.
In response, the Armenian Foreign Minister thanked Iran for making strong statements and stepping forward for the development of the Caucasus region, saying that Iran’s help would be needed as there would be a need to hold talks and general meetings among regional countries “at this critically important time.” said.
During his meeting with Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov, Iranian President Raisi said that Iran has always attached importance to dialogue between neighboring countries in the region to resolve regional problems, adding that there is a need to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries concerned. He emphasized that there is.
Accordingly, the Azerbaijani Foreign Minister actively agreed with Iran’s position to prevent foreign intervention in regional issues. He said he was grateful for Azerbaijan’s efforts to preserve its territory.
On the evening of the 23rd, the foreign ministers of the two countries held a meeting with their Iranian, Russian and Russian counterparts and discussed the recent conflict in the southern Caucasus.
At this event, Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian announced that he would actively support future peace talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Iran’s official IRNA news agency reported.
The Iranian minister warned that there is a risk that this region could become a site of competition between world powers, and repeatedly warned that it would be best to resolve regional disputes among the countries in the region.
Armenia and Arbaijan in the Caucasus Mountains region once again engaged in armed conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region on September 27.
The two countries, which have been fighting over this mountainous area for nearly 40 years since 1988, each speak differently about the situation on this day. Armenia claimed that Azerbaijan attacked Stepanakert, the capital of the disputed region, at 8 a.m. with helicopters and drones and fired tank shells, killing several civilians.
Azerbaijan, on the other hand, countered by saying that the Armenian military shelled the entire border area, killing civilians.
Although the ceasefire talks that the two countries agreed to in 1994 are maintained, intermittent clashes and local wars have continued since then. After a border clash on September 27, 2020, a cease-fire meeting was held again on November 9 of that year through Russian mediation.
As the fighting expanded again on September 19th of this year, Russia stepped forward the next day and achieved cease-fire talks.
Source: Donga
Nikol Pashinyan presented Lithuanian Prime Minister the fact of ethnic cleansing in Nagorno-Karabakh
19:25,
YEREVAN, OCTOBER 19, ARMENPRESS. During the meeting with Lithuanian Prime Minister Ingrida Šimonytė, the Prime Minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan, presented the fact of the NK exodus due to the ethnic cleansing that took place in Nagorno-Karabakh.
"At the meeting with Prime Minister ŠimonytėI I presented the current situation in our region, first of all, the ethnic cleansing that took place in Nagorno- Karabakh, and the fact that another 100,000 Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh have become refugees, as well as the steps taken by the Armenian government to meet their urgent needs were presented, " said PM Pashinyan.
The Prime Minister of Armenia thanked the Lithuanian government and the European Union for their quick response to the created humanitarian situation and for providing financial support.
Lithuania intends to support the deepening of EU-Armenia relations, says Lithuanian PM
20:02,
Opinion: Not just a border dispute. Armenians lose their ethnic lands and treasures amid conflict
Life has ended in Artsakh as countless families are forced to abandon their homes, leaving behind cherished memories and tokens of their existence. The Azerbaijan offensive in Artsakh is a direct attack on innocent children, families, and the cherished lands and sites they hold dear. Armenian families, facing starvation, are being forcefully displaced and left homeless after enduring a year-long blockade imposed by Azerbaijan’s military.
As an Armenian residing in the United States, I felt overwhelming fear and despair for my family in Artsakh after hearing of the bombing in their city, Stepanakert. As a human rights advocate, I deeply mourned the global ignorance surrounding this tragedy.
The war is taking place in Artsakh (also called Nagorno-Karabakh), a region with an ethnic connection to Armenia but falsely claimed by Azerbaijan.
Armenia, a historic nation with roots dating back thousands of years, rests in the mountainous regions of the Caucasus. However, the Armenian community extends beyond this region, with a prominent diaspora in Los Angeles.
For decades Armenia has experienced numerous land disputes, a modern one emerging in the 1920s when Joseph Stalin signed Artsakh over to Soviet Azerbaijan’s border.
Since then, multiple wars have erupted in the region. From 1988-1994, the First Nagorno-Karabakh War took place, resulting in the occupied lands being victoriously returned to Armenia. In the war of 2020, a ceasefire was signed. However, up until a few weeks ago, Artsakh had been under a deadly siege since December of 2022, cutting off all necessary supplies from entering Artsakh. In mid-September, after a bombing attack by Azerbaijan, Armenian forces surrendered in hopes of preserving peace, and nearly 100,000 Armenians fled the region of Artsakh.
Among those fleeing is a professor from the Artsakh State University who describes the situation with honest concern, stating, “This is the end, this is the end of the world, a big tragedy. Life had ended.”
The forceful removal of Armenians from their ethnic lands is a step in the process of erasing Armenian history in the region to develop Azerbaijani propaganda regarding the occupation by Armenians. It’s absurd that the UN fails to hold Azerbaijan accountable for its war crimes. Therefore, it’s up to Armenian Americans and those who care about human rights to pressure and demand action from the United States government.
It is inaccurate to identify motivations other than ethnic cleansing as a reason Azerbaijan has taken over this land since Artsakh has been recognized as a part of Armenia long before the Turkic group migrated from Central Asia.
Here is a comparison between the map of the Kingdom of Armenia and the map of Armenia today.
During the past conflicts, the Azerbaijani offensive destroyed historically valuable buildings and churches that date back thousands of years. These heritage sites are essential not only to Armenians but to the world because they serve as a window into the evolving cultures of the past and provide valuable lessons and connections for future generations to learn from.
The Armenian people have lost their homes and the right to own and preserve their cultural heritage. Here’s what has been lost:
Amaras monastery, dating back to the 4th Century. This is one of the world’s oldest Christian monuments and a significant religious site for Armenians. This monastery played an essential role in the spread of Christianity in Armenia. The sacred site is also the place where St. Mesrob Mashots, the inventor of the Armenian Alphabet, opened his very first school in 406 AD.
Gandzasar monastery, which is a very important regional cathedral, founded in the 13th century.
Tigranakert of Artsakh is an Armenian city dating back to 323 BC-32 BC. It is a historic site and the ruins are reminiscent of the once vast city founded by Tigranes the Great, one of the most significant kings in Armenian history.
As a manifestation of Armenian civilization, these sites belong under Armenian control. Armenians possess a deep reverence for them, and will maintain the sites.
This is beyond just a war. Armenians lost their loved ones, homes, and the right to live on their ethnic lands. As an Armenian living in Los Angeles, I feel deep sadness and regret for not visiting Artsakh and admiring its beautiful sites and lands.
It is an ominous reality that these sacred treasures have fallen into the hands of the aggressor, and it is heartbreaking that they hold the same fate as other heritage sites.
It’s important to be educated on this issue and comprehend the significance of this land and its historic value. Through acknowledgment and awareness, we can preserve and hold on to these historic sites and appreciate the beauty of this historic culture. In support of human rights and peace, we must take action now by spreading awareness about the humanitarian crisis in Artsakh and urging politicians to take measures against Azerbaijan’s invasion.
https://highschool.latimes.com/john-marshall-high-school/opinion-not-just-a-border-dispute-armenians-lose-their-ethnic-lands-and-treasures-amid-conflict/
Erdogan: We will develop relations with Armenia if it opens ‘Zangezur corridor,’ fulfills other promises
The president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has posited preconditions on the matter of normalization of his country’s relations with Armenia.
Erdogan stated that Turkey is ready to develop relations with Armenia step by step if Armenia opens the "Zangezur corridor" and fulfills the other promises, according to Anadolu Agency reported.
https://news.am/eng/news/785889.html
Armenia reports ‘casualties’ after saying Azerbaijani forced opened fire
“There are casualties on the Armenian side in the wake of the fire by the Azerbai-jani armed forces,” Armenia’s defense ministry said.
For all the latest headlines follow our Google News channel online or via the app.
According to the ministry, armed units of Azerbaijan targeted “a vehicle carrying food for the personnel of the Armenian combat outposts in the vicinity of Kut,” a village in eastern Armenia.
Azerbaijan’s defense ministry in a statement rejected the claim.
https://english.alarabiya.net/News/world/2023/10/02/Armenia-says-Azerbaijani-forces-open-fire-in-border-region
France examines Armenia’s defense needs – Sébastien Lecornu
15:14, 1 October 2023
YEREVAN, OCTOBER 1, ARMENPRESS. France is examining Armenia’s defense needs, French Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu has said.
In an interview with Franceinfo, Lecornu said that French President Emmanuel Macron is personally following the situation concerning Armenia.
“The President of the Republic is personally following this issue, which is important for France, important for many French people who love Armenia or have ties with Armenia,” the French Defense Minister said when asked whether France could intervene militarily to support to preserve Armenia’s territorial integrity.
“The President has said that the integrity, sovereignty and defense of the Armenian population are an absolute goal for us. I’ve met with Armenia’s Defense Minister multiple times. Besides, I think I am the first Minister of the Armed Forces who’s had so many contacts with the Armenian partner. We’ve opened a defense mission in Armenia that didn’t exist before, and which allows to have daily dialogue with the Armenian military and Armenian authorities, particularly to examine their needs in case of necessity,” the French Defense Minister said.
Regarding the question on possible military intervention, Lecornu said he doesn’t believe that could happen, but noted that it is up to the President to give an answer to this question. “In any case, looking at the demands that come from Armenia so that it can defend itself is obviously something that we do,” he added.