Turkish press: 5 more Turkish-made minesweepers delivered to Azerbaijan

Sena Guler   |05.05.2021

ANKARA

Five more Turkish-made mine-clearing equipment have been delivered to Azerbaijan, the Turkish National Defense Ministry said on Wednesday.

In a Twitter post, the ministry said: “The export continues to Azerbaijan of MEMATT [Mechanical Mine-Clearing Equipment], a remote-controlled mine-clearing vehicle produced by ASFAT, an affiliate of our ministry.”

With the latest batch, the total number of MEMATT minesweepers delivered to Azerbaijan rose to seven.

After arrival of the first batch in February this year, the minesweepers passed all required tests in Azerbaijan.

Azerbaijani officials said that they will use minesweepers in the territories Azerbaijani army recently liberated from the occupation of Armenian forces.

The MEMATT, a top-notch unmanned mine-clearing equipment, achieved over a 95% success rate in mine tests conducted in Turkey, according to an ASFAT expert, Yasin Arslan.

It has high resistance to explosions, and it is faster, reliable and minimizes loss of life.

Lawmakers discuss parliamentary commission report on 2016 April War

Save

Share

 10:35, 5 May, 2021

YEREVAN, MAY 5, ARMENPRESS. The report of the parliamentary commission investigating the circumstances of the 2016 April War is being discussed by lawmakers at a closed session.

Lawmakers earlier approved the decision to hold a closed session for the discussion because the report includes classified information.  

The commission was set up on May 31 in 2019 and is headed by Andranik Kocharyan, the Chair of the Parliamentary Committee on Defense and Security Affairs.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Calls for Israel, Australia to back Armenians

Australian Jewish News/Times of Israel
April 29 2021

Armenian Church Seeks Reparation in Lawsuit Against Turkey


April 30 2021



04/30/2021 Turkey (International Christian Concern) –  After a six-year struggle for a court hearing, the Armenian Apostolic Church Holy See, known as the Catholicosate of Cilicia, successfully refiled a lawsuit against the government of Turkey. In 2015, the Catholicosate, currently headquartered in Antelias, Lebanon, filed a lawsuit for the return of its historic seat and primary location in Sis, Turkey that was confiscated in 1921 during the Armenian Genocide. The lawsuit is part of Armenian’s larger goal of returning all properties and assets confiscated by Turkey during the eight-year genocide.

Due to technicalities, the lawsuit bounced between local courts, Turkey’s Constitutional Court, and the ECHR. A pre-trial hearing finally took place on March 30, 2021 in the Kozan Civil Litigation Court. At that time a judge agreed to accept the lawsuit, which the Catholicosate’s lawyers consider a positive development. The next hearing is scheduled for May 6, 2021.

The team of lawyers suspects the lower Turkish court will reject the lawsuit, at which point an appeal will be made to the Constitutional Court. Rejection is also suspected at this point which will allow the Catholicosate to file with the European Court of Human Rights.

When the original lawsuit was filed in 2015, Catholicos Aram I said, “This is the time that we move from the stage of [Genocide] recognition to reparation. After 100 years, I thought it was time that we put the emphasis on reparation. … This is the first legal step. This will be followed by our claim to return all the churches, the monasteries, the church-related properties and, finally, the individual properties.”


https://www.persecution.org/2021/04/30/armenian-church-seeks-reparation-lawsuit-turkey/

Republican Party of Armenia to run in snap elections in alliance with Hayrenik

Public Radio of Armenia






The Republican Party of Armenia will run in the forthcoming snap
parliamentary elections in alliance with the Hayrenik (Homeland)
Party, Vice-President of the Party Armen Ashotyan told reporters after
the sitting of the Supreme Body.

The sitting was chaired by President of the Party Serzh Sargsyan.

“As a result of discussions on the possible format of participation,
it was decided to form an alliance with the Hayrenik Party,” Ashotyan
said.

Hayrenik party is led by former Director of the National Security
Service Artur Vanetsyan.



 

The Emerging Multi-polar World and Small States: The Case of Armenia

Indra Stra
By Dr. Benyamin Poghosyan 
Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies, Yerevan, Armenia

The end of the cold war and the collapse of the Soviet Union have ushered in hopes of humanity's happy and harmonious future. The ideas such as "End of history" became very popular both within academic circles and policymakers. There was a widespread belief that the entire planet would live under liberal democracy, and interstate conflicts will become bad memories from history. The last decade of the XX century seemed to confirm those hopes. The EU and NATO enlargement, market reforms in former socialist states, cooperative relations between Russia and the West, and the growing US-China economic cooperation have seemingly justified hopes for establishing the world united under the banner of liberal democracy. The US enjoyed its absolute hegemony defined as a "Unipolar moment" with no apparent candidate to challenge its supremacyWashington embraced the grand strategy of liberal hegemony, which was in one way or another implemented during the Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations.


However, the beginning of the XXI century crushed these hopes. Russia – West relations started to deteriorate after the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine, while the 2014 Crimean crisis brought bilateral relations to the lowest point since the end of the Cold War. Meanwhile, astonishing Chinese economic growth and the emergence of the multi-million middle class did not bring about political changes in China. 


The turning point was the 2008 world financial crisis. It started in the US and shook the Western-dominated international financial system. It coincided with the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, which proved the ascent of China. The old mechanisms such as G-7 and later G-8 were unable to implement effective global governance, and the first summit of the G-20 in November 2008 was the harbinger of an upcoming tectonic shift in the world order. The establishment of new multilateral organizations such as BRICS and India and Brazil's rapid growth were clear signs that the world was drifting away from the "Unipolar Moment" towards a more complex multi-polar world.


The election of President Trump in November 2016 brought about new impetus in the US-China rivalry, while despite the perceived pro-Russia policy of President Trump, there were no significant improvements in the US – Russia relations. The 2017 US National Security Strategy explicitly put the great power rivalry at the center of the current international relations accusing Russia and China of their revisionist efforts. 


Despite all its criticism of President Trump, President Biden most probably will continue tough policy towards China seeking to encircle Beijing with the US-friendly states. A recent effort to transform Quad grouping into an alliance is a clear sign of US intentions, while the policy towards Russia is more nuanced. Biden called President Putin "a killer" and imposed new sanctions on Kremlin. Meanwhile, the US offered Russia to organize a bilateral Presidential summit in 2021, stating its intention "to have predictable relations with Moscow." President Biden reiterated his desire to reinvigorate the US alliances, strengthen transatlantic ties and protect democracy. It may seem that the Biden administration seeks to restore the US absolute hegemony and bring back the world to 1991. However, this is an unrealistic goal, and most probably, the Biden administration understands well that the world in the XXI century will be the "multi-polar" one. The recent publication in one of the most influential American think tanks argued for establishing the "New concert of powers” resembling the XIX century “Concert of Europe” and warned against efforts to restore the grand strategy of the liberal hegemony. It is a clear sign that at least part of the American establishment understands that a multi-polar world is a reality and the best course for the US is to adapt to these new conditions.


The emergence of the "Multi-polar world order" will inevitably trigger regional instability and the rivalry for regional hegemony. The absence of the world hegemon or the "world policeman" means that the second-tier states will be more inclined to use coercion as the primary tool to push forward their national interests. These states now enjoy much more flexibility in choosing their alliances and playing one great power off another. One of the best examples of this situation in Turkey. Being fully anchored in the US sphere of influence during the Cold war, Turkey now effectively balances between the US and Russia, opposing Washington in Syria and Kremlin in the Black Sea region. The Greater Middle East is a good example depicting the rivalry for regional hegemony between Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, while external players such as Russia, the US, and China seek to push forward their national interests.


If an emerging multi-polar world creates new possibilities for the second-tier states, the small states face growing challenges and threats. The rivalry for regional hegemony, growing instability, the erosion of accepted rules and norms, and the emphasis on coercion in interstate relations create complex problems for small states. It is especially valid for small states which are located on the fault lines of great powers. They may quickly become the "gray zones" or "areas of hybrid operations" with possible proxy wars and permanent instability. 


The South Caucasus is one of such areas contested by Russia, Iran, Turkey, the US, the EU, and recently China. The harbinger of the more volatile and insecure world for the region was the 2020 Karabakh war, which resulted in the defeat of Armenia. It was an example of cooperative/competitive relations of powers vying for regional hegemony – in this case, Russia and Turkey – and the growing role of military power in the conflict settlement process. Meanwhile, despite significant gains by Azerbaijan, Baku failed to take Nagorno Karabakh fully and was forced to accept the Russian peacekeepers' deployment. President Aliyev reiterates that conflict has been solved, but anyone with basic knowledge about the region understands that this is not the case. Azerbaijan either has to accept the independent status of Nagorno Karabakh or wage another war if Russian peacekeepers leave the region.


Meanwhile, the 2020 Karabakh war was a harsh lesson for Armenia. Yerevan should reconsider its foreign policy if it does not want to lose what remained from Karabakh. The key here is not to ruin the strategic alliance with Russia. If Russian soldiers leave Karabakh, no state or organization globally – the US, France, Germany, China, India, NATO, or EU, will prevent Armenians' massacre or forced deportation. The alliance with Russia is an absolute necessity but not sufficient to secure the future of Armenia and Karabakh. Armenia should develop relations with all powers that are not happy with assertive Turkish foreign policy in the South Caucasus and beyond. It does not mean that no trade or economic relations can exist between Armenia and Turkey. There are many examples of adversary states having diplomatic and economic relations, such as India and Pakistan. However, Armenia should significantly restrict the access for Turkish capital and investments to enter the Armenian market. 


Armenia should pay significant attention to fostering cooperation with China in its efforts to develop relations with other powers concerned with growing Turkish influence and assertive foreign policy in the Caucasus and Central Asia. As for now, China is not an active player in the South Caucasus, but the situation may change. The recent China – Iran multibillion investment deal brought China closer to Armenia. China and Turkey enjoy strong economic cooperation, and Turkey is a significant actor in the Chinese “Belt and Road” initiative. However, the growing pressure of the United States on China concerning the Uyghur issue, and the support which Uyghurs enjoy in Turkey, create complications in the bilateral relations.


Meanwhile, Armenia should not sit and wait until China approaches Yerevan with suggestions. Armenia is too small for China to put Armenia into its strategic calculus. Yerevan needs to develop a solid strategy towards China, and as the first step, Armenia needs to send clear messages underlying Armenia's friendly attitude towards Beijing. These steps may include starting negotiations to invite Chinese telecom companies to explore the possibility of launching a 5G network in Armenia and an Armenian decision to cancel its membership in the International Religious Freedom Alliance, an irritant for Beijing.


About the Author:
Dr. Benyamin Poghosyan is Founder and Chairman, Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies and also, Executive Director, Political Science Association of Armenia since 2011. He was Vice President for Research – Head of the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense Research University in Armenia in August 2016 – February 2019. He joined Institute for National Strategic Studies (predecessor of NDRU) in March 2009 as a Research Fellow and was appointed as INSS Deputy Director for research in November 2010. Before this, he was the Foreign Policy Adviser of the Speaker of the National Assembly of Armenia. Dr. Poghosyan has also served as a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of History of the National Academy of Sciences and was an adjunct professor at Yerevan State University and in the European Regional Educational Academy.

His primary research areas are the geopolitics of the South Caucasus and the Middle East, US – Russian relations, and their implications for the region. He is the author of more than 70 Academic papers and OP-EDs in different leading Armenian and international journals. In 2013, Dr. Poghosyan was appointed as a "Distinguished Research Fellow" at the US National Defense University – College of International Security Affairs and also, he is a graduate of the US State Department's Study of the US Institutes for Scholars 2012 Program on US National Security policymaking. He holds a Ph.D. in History and is a graduate from the 2006 Tavitian Program on International Relations at Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.      

     

EU can have deeper involvement in assisting Armenia , Lithuanian FM says in Yerevan

Save

Share

 15:29,

YEREVAN, APRIL 26, ARMENPRESS. Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis says he is sure that the European Union can have deeper involvement in providing assistance to Armenia.

“Of course, Lithuania was one of the biggest supporters of Eastern Partnership,” Landsbergis told ARMENPRESS when asked during a joint press conference with FM Ara Aivazian the Lithuanian assessment of the Armenia-EU partnership as a country which always contributed to the development of Eastern Partnership.

“I entirely welcome the fact that the enhanced agreement which came into force recently creates a clear platform for further cooperation, but I am sure that more can be done, and Europe can be more deeper involved in providing assistance to Armenia, especially now at this difficult time,” Landsbergis  said.

“Lithuania is here not only on the national level but as a European country,” he added.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

First round of vote expected May 3, Speaker says after Pashinyan resignation

Save

Share

 15:43,

YEREVAN, APRIL 26, ARMENPRESS. Following the resignation of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Speaker of Parliament Ararat Mirzoyan released a statement notifying that by law the parliament will convene an emergency session on May 3 for the first vote to elect a new prime minister.

The session is expected to be held as a formality in order to pave way for snap elections.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan resigned on April 25 – a move intended to pave way for snap election. The entire Cabinet also resigned. Holding early elections requires the dissolution of parliament, which in turn can happen when the legislature fails twice to elect a prime minister after the incumbent steps down. Pashinyan said during his resignation that his bloc will formally nominate and subsequently vote him down during both votings in order to maintain the technical requirements to disband the legislature.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Turkish talk of reconciliation angers Armenians on 106th anniversary of genocide

Al-Monitor
Turkey has warned the United States that President Joe Biden's expected characterization of the mass killings of the Ottoman Armenians in 1915 as a genocide will derail Turkish-Armenian reconciliation and further damage US-Turkish ties. Armenians say there is no reconciliation process to speak of.

Their love blossomed in the heady days when reconciliation between Turks and Armenians seemed within reach. Ihsan Karayazi, a Turk, first set eyes on Armine Avetisyan, an Armenian, in the eastern Turkish city of Kars in April 2006 — in a police station. She had been spotted photographing a military building, not knowing that she would land herself in trouble. Naif Alibeyoglu, then the mayor of Kars, swiftly intervened. His dreams of transforming the far-flung outpost on the Armenian border, eulogized in Orhan Pamuk’s mesmerizing novel "Snow," into a regional hub of economic and cultural activity in the Caucasus was not to be jeopardized. Alibeyoglu dispatched Karayazi, who was his aide at the time, to disentangle Avetisyan from the clutches of the police. Karayazi, 38, and Avetisyan, 40, are happily married.

What if the same events had played out today? Avetisyan might be in jail, Alibeyoglu potentially fired over his overtures to Armenians, and “there would be absolutely no question of our getting married,” said Karayazi, who now lives in Boston, where he works as a cultural entrepreneur and Avetisyan as a project manager at Brandeis University. “I could never go to Armenia and feel as welcome as I did then, and nor would Armine and I be able to settle in Turkey. The paradigm has shifted, our hearts are broken,” he told Al-Monitor.

On April 24, Joe Biden is widely expected to become the first US president to formally describe the mass extermination of more than a million Ottoman Armenians in 1915 as a genocide. April 24 will mark the 106th anniversary of the bloodletting that all but wiped out Turkey’s ethnic Armenian population. For decades, survivors and their descendants have been pushing for governments and parliaments across the world to acknowledge the genocide, as most credible historians do, in the face of a massive propaganda campaign launched by Turkey arguing that the Armenians died as a result of famine and disease in the midst of war.

Biden was expected to inform Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of his decision in his first phone call as president to the Turkish leader which took place shortly before publication of this article. 

Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu warned that any such move would deal a further blow to Washington’s troubled ties with its NATO ally. Undoubtedly it will. Turkish officials also say Biden’s acknowledgement of the genocide would “derail reconciliation efforts” between Turkey and Armenia.

What reconciliation?

To many Armenians still reeling from the humiliating defeat inflicted by Azerbaijan thanks to Turkish drones and military advisers and Syrian mercenaries in November in the contested Nagorno-Karabakh enclave, this claim sounds obscene. “What reconciliation?” scoffed Alin Ozinian, a Yerevan-based Armenian researcher who has roots in Istanbul. “The prevailing sentiment among Armenians is that '100 years ago they [Turkey] wanted to exterminate our race and make us vanish from the face of the earth,' and that 'today they want to do the same thing, kill us all’; that is what most Armenians, be they uneducated or educated, here think,” Ozinian told Al-Monitor. As such, there would be a fierce public backlash if any Armenian government were to reciprocate any Turkish moves to reopen its border with Armenia. The border was unilaterally sealed by Ankara in 1993 in support of Baku in a previous and protracted bout of fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. Turkish officials have been hinting they may reopen the border now that Nagorno Karabakh is back in Azerbaijani hands.

The 44-day long conflict left 3,360 Armenian and 2,855 Azerbaijani troops dead, according to official figures, which are considered to be low. Hundreds of Syrian fighters and dozens of civilians also were killed.

“That’s a very high number for a country as small as Armenia,” Ozinian said of the death toll for the country of nearly 3 million. “Every family has been affected in some way, be it through the deaths of friends or relatives, or those who are either wounded or missing,” she added. Against this backdrop, Biden’s acknowledgment of the genocide would inject a tremendous moral boost for Armenians across the globe.

Salpi Ghazarian, director of the University of Southern California’s Institute of Armenian Studies and a former foreign policy adviser to the Armenian government who is descended from survivors of the genocide, said, “The Biden promise is in some ways reassuring that perhaps US foreign policy can in fact be complex and nuanced and simultaneously espouse and support human rights and values and all of the things that the US says it believes in while at the same time pursuing its bilateral agenda with Turkey but with one not falling victim to the other.”

She said, “The statement is of symbolic importance. It is important for the memory of my grandmother who lived her whole life suffering for what she was exposed to as a 5-year old. Not only is it important for her memory and for my kids, it’s important for all of us as Americans.” 

As recently as six years ago, Armenians from the diaspora and from within Turkey gathered in Istanbul and farther east in Diyarbakir, where Armenian communities thrived before 1915, to mark the centenary of the genocide. Turkish talk of reconciliation then rang true.

The commemorative events, which unfolded peacefully, were the culmination of more than a decade of reforms launched by Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party (AKP). The aim was to end military tutelage and win membership in the European Union. That same year, Karayazi and Avetisyan tied the knot. “Our wedding invitations were printed in Turkish and Armenian. I am from Kadirli, a very nationalist town [in the southern province of Adana]. Nobody batted an eyelid,” Karayazi recalled.

Image

Ihsan Karayazi and Armine Avetisyan on their wedding day in Istanbul, Sept. 20, 2015. (Toga Sezgin)

In the preceding years, several momentous developments had occurred. In 2005, in the face of a fierce nationalist backlash, Turkish and Armenian scholars gathered for the first time to openly debate the once taboo subject of 1915 at a university in Istanbul. Previously banned works on the genocide appeared in bookstores. “Hidden Armenians” — the grandchildren of Armenians who had converted to Islam in order to avoid being murdered — began to emerge from the shadows. In September 2008, then-President Abdullah Gul became the first Turkish head of state to travel to Armenia to watch a World Cup qualifier soccer match between the two countries’ national teams alongside his Armenian counterpart, Serge Sargsyan. Swiss-brokered talks to establish diplomatic relations between Turkey and Armenia resulted in the signing of a set of protocols in April 2009, in which the sides unconditionally pledged to establish diplomatic relations and reopen their sealed borders.

Nationalist hackles began to rise, Azerbaijan cried foul and Erdogan shelved the deal. Another early sign of the depth of the nationalist backlash bloodily burst into the open when, on Jan. 19, 2007, Turkish Armenian intellectual Hrant Dink was shot dead in Istanbul outside the office of Agos, the Armenian Turkish weekly newspaper he founded and edited. Dink had been at the vanguard of a movement to force Turkey to acknowledge the crimes of the past, and for Turks and Armenians to reconcile.

Dink had the support of a prominent Turkish businessman and philanthropist Osman Kavala. Nicknamed the “Red Billionaire” for his left-leaning views, Kavala helped organize and finance numerous projects bringing together Armenian and Turkish journalists, artists, historians and youths through his civil society organization Anadolu Kultur.

In Kars, Kavala lent support to the annual Golden Goose film festival and the Caucasian Culture festival, launched a year earlier in 2004, when Alibeyoglu was elected mayor on the AKP ticket. “Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Georgians, Persians, Turks and Kurds were circle dancing together. Hrant [Dink] came. It was quite extraordinary,” Alibeyoglu recalled. EU and US funding for Armenian Turkish reconciliation schemes flowed fast and furiously. Karayazi was among the beneficiaries. He launched a “culinary diplomacy” scheme in 2014, which brought together women from Kars and Avetisyan’s native Gyumri, who took turns hosting each other in their respective countries and sharing recipes. The results were published in a cook book.

The festivals are now a relic of the past. A giant sculpture commissioned by Alibeyoglu, tall enough to be visible from Armenia, was meant to relay a message of peace. In 2011 Erdogan called it a “freak” and it was duly demolished. 

Kavala has been in a Turkish prison since October 2017 on a slew of thinly evidenced charges that he was involved in the failed 2016 coup to overthrow Erdogan. The European Court of Human Rights, whose rulings are binding for Turkey, is demanding his immediate release. Erdogan, now informally allied with Devlet Bahceli, the far-right nationalist leader who egged on the war against Armenia and against Kurds in northern Syria, remains unfazed. Anadolu Kultur is under financial investigation and faces closure.

Coup de grace

The abortive coup attempt — which Erdogan’s blames on Fethullah Gulen, a Sunni preacher who lives in self-imposed exile in rural Pennsylvania — sounded the death knell for the AKP’s experiment with a Western-style democracy. Erdogan now stars on a roster of autocrats alongside Russia's Vladimir Putin, Hungary’s Viktor Orban and Venezuela’s Nicolas Maduro.

Ghazarian recalls the better days, saying there was a “period roughly between 1985 and 2015 when Armenians from the diaspora and from Armenia proper went looking for their villages, for their roots in Turkey. Sometimes that included places like Istanbul because people like me felt very comfortable being in a city that evoked my grandmother’s memories, her stories, the smells and the tastes.”

Ghazarian continued, “After 2016 many things were lost in Turkey, including the place of Armenians, be they Armenians of Turkey or people like me who had pragmatic hopes.”

“If Osman Kavala can be sitting in prison all this time for only having done good, none of us should be surprised at the way in which relationships within Turkey between Armenians and Turks and outside of Turkey have evaporated, have disappeared,” Ghazarian said.