Opposition Forces Form Political Movement Against Crime

OPPOSITION FORCES FORM POLITICAL MOVEMENT AGAINST CRIME

Noyan Tapan
Sept 11 2006

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 11, NOYAN TAPAN. Representatives of the
Constitutional Law Union, the National Unity, the Democratic Party
of Armenia, the Homeland and Honor Party, the National Democratic
Union and Armenian Union of Political Scientists expressed readiness
to start a political movement against crime at the September 11
meeting of opposition forces initiated by the Nor Zhamanakner (New
Times) Party. In the words of Nor Zhamanakner Party’s Chairman Aram
Karapetian, the goal of the meeting was also to "clear up who is alive,
who has become victim of crime after the November events (referendum
on constitutional amendments: NT). In his words, the meeting is
a preparatory one and in the future, when the names of movement
participants are clarified, more organized events will be held. In
the words of NDU Chairman Vazgen Manukian, a document should be formed
that will mention what political crime is and against whom they will
struggle. In the words of Homeland and Honor Party Chairman Garnik
Margarian, crime is a group of people that ignoring the country’s
laws, acts in accordance with its own laws. Today these groups, as
he emphasized, have penetrated "into the President’s environment and
National Assembly." In the opinion of Chairman of Armenian Union of
Political Scientists Hmayak Hovhannisian, the current public-political
situation in the country is extraordinary, as criminal way of thinking
has started to rule: "I have money, so I will dictate my decisions." As
Hovhannisian affirmed, "business-elite strives for establishing its
dictate in Armenia." In the words of Hanrapetutiun (Republic) Party’s
political Board member, former Armenian Minister of Internal Affairs
and former Yerevan Mayor Suren Abrahamian, the situation in Armenia
is uncontrollable, as "the authorities have already become hostages
in the hands of crime."

NA Autumn Session Launches

NA AUTUMN SESSION LAUNCHES
Margaret Yesayan

Aravot, Armenia
Sept 12 2006

Unlike all previous sessions the parliamentarians weren’t in festive
mood and suits in the first sitting of the NA autumn session.

Everybody was tired and strained. It is clear that this is their last
session and the spring session will be held after parliamentarian
elections. Another six months and nowadays parliament will fight for
re-electing and the right to enter the NA building.

As usual, parliamentarians were carrying out a difficult work to form
the agenda. It was formed with difficulty, and parliamentarians who
had already voted for that agenda, left the hall at once. There were
some obvious changes, in particularly Victor Dallakian who had left
"Justice" faction took his seat not on the former place, next to
Stepan Demirchian but behind Arshak Sadoyan and in front of Artashes
Geghamian, that was the place where Aram Zaveni Sargsian must sit if
he didn’t boycott the works of the parliament. Tatul Manaserian who
had also left "Justice" took his seat a little farther, on the row
for independent parliamentarians.

Gagik Tsarukian, Lyova Sargsian, Samvel Alexanian were absent,
but the opposition was present except Aram Zaveni Sargsian, Smbat
Ayvazian and Albert Bazeyan.

Though Tigran Torosian as the NA chairman opened the session for the
first time, but nobody congratulated him. Instead, there wasn’t any
lack of disputes and disagreement. Hmayak Hovhannisian was constantly
complaining that the personnel hadn’t given him all necessary drafts
and he tried to explain that omission by dismissals made by the NA
chairman. Aram Gaspari Sargsian proposed to invite the leaders of power
structures to get information about detections of frequent murders,
blasts and other crimes. Tigran Torosian admitted the proposal but he
didn’t promised it would be in the near future as the authority was
very busy because of the visit of the chairman of Islamic Republic
of Iran and his delegation.

Armenia 53rd In Economic Freedom Rating

ARMENIA 53RD IN ECONOMIC FREEDOM RATING

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.09.2006 14:33 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ According to the report, made public by the Cato
Institute, Hong Kong is the leader on economic freedom indicators in
the world. It is followed by Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland and
the US. The UK and Ireland are the sixth. The top ten also includes
Canada, Island and Luxembourg.

Among the countries of the former USSR Estonia has the highest place –
it is the 12th. Latvia and Lithuania are 35th and 40th respectively,
while Georgia and Armenia both on the 53rd place, and Azerbaijan is
the 83rd. Russia is 102nd, thus it occupies a place lower than most
of the former USSR country. The situation with freedom is even worse
in Ukraine, which is the 111th. Zimbabwe and Burma are on the last
places of the rating of 130 countries.

Cato Institute has been annually publishing the rating of economic
freedom of the countries of the world since 1980, reports Lenta.ru.

The Language Was Universal

THE LANGUAGE WAS UNIVERSAL
By Donna Gorman

Christian Science Monitor, MA
Sept 10 2006

Making friends and learning the language in Armenia took longer than
expected – until the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

The house we moved into was huge and beautiful. The neighborhood
was supposed to be one of the best in all of Yerevan, the capital of
Armenia, but it didn’t impress me.

Our elegant house was surrounded by an eight-foot wall topped with
gleaming metal spikes. The neighboring houses were large, and while
many were walled like ours, others were protected by flapping plastic
tarps or corrugated metal sheeting that rattled ominously in the
wind. Stray dogs roamed streets full of potholes. Soviet-era cars
careened down the hill, with no sidewalk separating pedestrians
from vehicles.

In the Monitor Monday, 09/11/06

Across the street was a small cinder-block building, a shop that had
been tacked onto the front of a house as an afterthought. The windows
of this squat little place were covered with bars. The walls were
crumbling, the paint peeling. Two scrawny cats groomed themselves at
the entrance.

Every day I walked past this little shop on my way down the hill to
work, and the laughter I heard from within seemed directed at me,
the foreigner. The metal shop door slammed closed behind customers
who exited with loaves of bread tucked under their arms, hurrying
past with surreptitious glances.

I couldn’t see past the bars and the dusty glass, so I avoided the
store, choosing instead to frequent a larger one near my office,
even though I had to lug bags of groceries home on a rickety bus.

Then one day, I ran out of bread. I gathered my courage and opened that
creaking metal door, squinting into the shadows. Makeshift shelves
stretched from floor to ceiling, piled high with candy, shampoo,
and flour, among other necessities. A glass case filled with cheese
and sausage separated the customers from the cash register.

Another glass case, which ran the length of the shop, was filled with
ice cream. I stood cautiously near the door, looking for the bread.

The woman behind the counter smiled at me. In Russian, she greeted me:
"So you’re the new neighbor. We’ve been expecting you. I’m Anna.

Come in, come in."

She called into a back room, summoning the rest of her family from
the house for introductions: her white-haired husband, Gevorg;
daughter-in-law, Hasmik; three sons; and two small grandchildren,
who hid behind their mother.

They all lived together in the house behind the shop, and they ran
the store together. They peppered me with questions, all speaking at
once in Russian, which I understood, and in Armenian, which I didn’t.

It took 30 minutes to get the bread and cross the street again, and
in that time, I realized what a fool I’d been to travel across town
twice a week when everything I wanted was in that store.

A few days later, I ran out of eggs. I grabbed some change and dashed
across the street. This time, Anna introduced me to some of her other
customers. It took almost an hour to buy my eggs, as the neighbors
lined up to meet me, to ask me about America. These same neighbors
had seemed so unwelcoming, hostile even, just one week before.

On my third visit to the store, I confessed that I was studying
Armenian. So Anna switched from Russian to Armenian: "What do you
need today?" she asked me slowly.

The line behind me grew as I stumbled through my order, but Anna
wouldn’t let me switch back to Russian. The store grew crowded as
my neighbors gathered to cheer me on, laughing good-naturedly at my
mistakes, pleased to hear me try.

Soon I began stopping by the store each day to greet Anna and buy a
crusty loaf of bread. One day I asked why she almost never took money
from anyone, choosing instead to write their totals in a dog-eared
book she kept by the register.

Her smile faded. "The people here, they are so poor, so poor. If they
can’t pay now, I’ll give them what they need. Some day, if they have
the money, they’ll pay me back."

She pulled out her book. "This one here, she’s a widow," Anna said.

"How will she survive without me?" The widow owed $75, an impossible
sum in a country where most don’t earn that in a month. "This man lost
his job. But he has children to feed. They all have children to feed."

She put the book away, patting it carefully. "Some day, they will
pay me. And if they can’t, well, I still can’t turn them away."

When I had the time, I stood in the store practicing my Armenian with
anyone who stopped at the register. My Armenian improved slightly,
but it was still a struggle to speak and be understood.

I grew to love this place, so different from home. The people in
Anna’s store seldom had any money, it’s true, yet they weren’t poor
except in the financial sense of the word. The friends I made were
loud and passionate people who shared what little they had with their
extended families. Families were close-knit, with several generations
under one roof – all pitching in to move each day forward.

On Sept. 11, 2001, I sat in my Armenian house and watched as the
faraway events unfolded on my television. I sat all afternoon and
into the evening – shocked, unmoving – eyes glued to the TV screen.

Although I’d lived overseas for years, I’d never felt quite so far
away from home, quite so lost in the middle of nowhere. The life I’d
constructed for myself in this land suddenly seemed lonely, and I
desperately wanted to be back in America, to grieve with people who
understood what had just happened.

The next morning, feeling a bit numb, I ventured out to work, past
the flapping plastic tarps and rattling metal fences – all familiar,
yet still eerie somehow.

On my way past the store, Anna ran out and stopped me. "We saw your
light on last night and wanted to come over," she said, "but we didn’t
want to disturb you. Oh, I am so, so sad and sorry."

Behind her stood a small clutch of customers, my neighbors, all lined
up to offer me their condolences. Some cried when they spoke. They
spoke to me in Russian and in Armenian. And I understood.

Armenian Government Creates Council On EU Relations

ARMENIAN GOVERNMENT CREATES COUNCIL ON EU RELATIONS

AP Worldstream
Sep 07, 2006

Armenia’s Cabinet said Thursday that it is creating a national council
for cooperation with the European Union and a government commission
that will coordinate relations with Brussels.

The commission will be chaired by Prime Minister Andranik Margarian,
and the council will include civil society groups, the government
press service said.

While it seeks to improve ties with the West, Armenia is Russia’s
closest ally among the three ex-Soviet republics of the Caucasus
Mountain region.

The speaker of parliament triggered a political scandal in the nation
of 3.3 million in April, when he reportedly told a German newspaper
that Armenia’s future lies with the European Union and NATO.

President Robert Kocharian quickly disavowed the remarks, saying
Armenia’s close military ties with Russia and other regional countries
provide sufficient security and that it has no plans to join NATO.

The speaker, Artur Bagdasarian, later resigned after his liberal
party quit the governing coalition because of dissatisfaction with
the government’s foreign policy and the pace of democratic reform.

Association Spends 5 Million Drams To Find Out How Many Minibus Driv

ASSOCIATION SPENDS 5 MILLION DRAMS TO FIND OUT HOW MANY MINIBUS DRIVERS SMOKE WHILE DRIVING

Armenpress
Sept 07 2006

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 7, ARMENPRESS: The Armenian Medical Association
has spent 5 million drams to carry out a three-month long program to
monitor the application of the anti-tobacco law in public transport
and raise the population’s awareness about smoking risks.

Some 2.3 million drams of this money were a presidential grant given
to the Association as the winner of a competition announced to choose
an organization to carry out the program. The other 2.7 million drams
were the Association’s input.

Parunak Zelveyan, the president of the Association, told a news
conference today that the survey found that 5 of 10 minibus drivers
defy the requirements of the anti-tobacco law by smoking while
driving. He said some 500 passengers and 100 drivers were covered by
the survey that also found that out of 100 drivers 77 are smokers.

Only 23 percent of drivers put out their cigarettes when passengers ask
them to do so and only 42 percent of drivers knew that the law forbids
their smoking when driving, while 21 percent never heard of the law.

Of passengers only 34 percent knew about the law.

Almost 95 percent of male and 84 percent of female passengers spoke
against drivers’ smoking while driving. They said they never rebuke
drivers for smoking just to avoid conflicting situations.

Zelveyan said after the end of the program chief managers of companies
running minibuses were invited for a consultation but only one turned
out. When asked by telephone the managers said they forbid their
drivers to smoke while driving.

Zelveyan said a sub-law envisaging a punishment for smoking drivers
should be developed and applied, but he did not elaborate what kind
of measure could be applied.

Is Azerbaijan Sabotaging Preliminary Agreements On Nagorno Karabakh?

IS AZERBAIJAN SABOTAGING PRELIMINARY AGREEMENTS ON NAGORNO KARABAKH?

Regnum, Russia
Sept 6 2006

"The present international situation allows Armenia to use leading
international force centers concerned for pressuring Azerbaijan. The
point is that the EU and the US are interested in early resolution
of the Karabakh conflict, while Moscow is interested in the ‘neither
peace, nor war’ situation as only this can keep Armenia as Russia’s
‘outpost’ in the South Caucasus. The referendum on the status of
Nagorno Karabakh is the price Armenia may ask for readiness to change
the ‘master’," says Zerkalo daily (Baku).

Referring to reliable sources, the daily says that, before the
parliamentary elections in Azerbaijan, the US had got Baku and Yerevan
to give a preliminary consent to sign peace agreement exactly in
2006. "No coincidence that after the talks with Azeri President Ilham
Aliyev during Aliyev’s first visit to the US after the parliamentary
elections, US President George Bush said that he was sure that there
would be a breakthrough in the Armenian-Azeri peace talks by the end of
2006. The year is coming to an end, but there is no breakthrough. The
same reliable sources report the US to consider this as a sabotage of
the preliminary agreements, first of all, on the part of Azerbaijan,"
says Zerkalo.

The daily reports the Azeri President to be going to take part in
the opening of the UN General Assembly in New York on September 19-22.

Presently US and Azeri diplomats are trying to agree on a Bush-Aliyev
meeting. "This meeting is extremely important for both sides. If it
takes place, the sides will, certainly, discuss the situation over
the Karabakh peace talks. Naturally, Bush will remind Aliyev about
his expectations for settlement in 2006," says Zerkalo.

The Recognition Of The Armenian Genocide Is A Prerequisite For Turke

THE RECOGNITION OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE IS A PREREQUISITE FOR TURKEY’S ACCESSION TO THE EU

ArmRadio.am
05.09.2006 17:40

The European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) voted late
last evening on the Eurlings report on "Turkey’s progress towards
accession" and its 343 amendments. This mostly critical report of
Turkey was adopted by 53 votes, with 6 against and 8 abstentions.

With regard to the question of the Armenian Genocide which was
constantly discussed during the debates, a majority of MEPs from
the main political groups (EPP, PSE, ALDE, GUE) adopted two similar
amendments which reiterates its call on Turkey to acknowledge the
Armenian Genocide as a precondition for its accession.

In addition, the AFET "strongly condemns the racist and xenophobic
‘Talaat Pasha committee for gravely infringing European principles,
and the denialist demonstrations in Lyon and Berlin" organized by
those same organizations.

It calls on Turkey to abolish this committee and end its activities.

The European Armenian Federation informs that the AFET also adopted
a compromise amendment disputed by many MEPs, which expresses a whole
series of obscure proposals such as the opening of the Turkish archives
and reconciliation between Armenia and Turkey.

The AFET committee also invites Turkey "to establish, without
preconditions, good neighborly relations with Armenia and to end the
economic blockade and to open the land border in order to fulfill the
priorities of the Accession Partnership and the obligations defined
within the Negotiating Framework".

"It is a victory for the Foreign Affairs Committee (AFET) which
confirms that it can resist the pressures of Ankara. We congratulate
the rapporteur and the many members of Parliament who reaffirmed
the political line of the Parliament, which consists in making the
recognition of the Genocide into a prerequisite for accession,"
declared Hilda Tchoboian, the chairperson of the European Armenian
Federation.

"However, we regret the amendment called the ‘compromise amendment’,
which in fact only copied the position of some isolated MEPs who still
support Ankara in its attempt to deny the Genocide and to escape the
political problem that it constitutes," continued Hilda Tchoboian.

No Alternative To The Present National Anthem

NO ALTERNATIVE TO THE PRESENT NATIONAL ANTHEM
By Karine Mangassarian

Yerkir.am
September 01, 2006

"A necessity to change the national anthem can occur only when a new
situation emerges in a given country, when the country enters a new
period in its history. Today’s hurry around the national anthem is
artificial and offensive," Vazgen Manukian states.

The constitutional amendments stated the necessity to have a law on the
national anthem. However, this constitutional provision is interpreted
by some people as a constitutional requirement to change the national
anthem. Manukian believes the reason for such a hurry is among other
things the wording of the respective constitutional provision. "I
think that if they want to change the anthem they should first of all
think – is there a better alternative? You need time for this. Today
is definitely not the right time for this," Manukian stated.

Chairman of National Revival Party, National Assembly Deputy Albert
Bazeyan shares the opinion that the hurry of the inter-agency committee
is not justified since there is no public demand for changing the
anthem today.

National Assembly Deputy Shavarsh Kocharian believes the anthem
could be changed only if a better alternative is found. Chairman of
the Christian Democratic Party of Armenia Khosrov Harutyunian notes
changing the national anthem was included into his party’s platform
during the elections in 2003.

"The issue of changing the anthem should not be turned into a source
of political hassle. It should not be turned into an initiative of
individual poets or composers. They are trying to change the anthem
in an arbitrary manner.

This is not acceptable and we should do our best to stop this
initiative," Harutyunian stated adding that more attention should
be paid to public opinion and people’s mood. Meanwhile, since in the
present pre-election period political disturbances are occurring the
issue can be easily manipulated for political purposes.

Chairman of the National Determination Party Paruyr Hayrikian believes
the intention to change the present anthem is not serious. "The
constitution stipulates the necessity for adopting a law on the anthem
and not the necessity to change the anthem. I have participated in the
process of constitutional amendments and I can assure that there is
no public demand for changing the anthem today. Several people want to
use this opportunity to please the Russians once again. Since Russian
President Vladimir Putin restored the anthem of the Soviet Union,
there people also want to do the same," Hayrikian stated.

There might come the right time for changing the present anthem,
but today is not the right time for this. Our national anthem has
passed a long way; we have had our victories with this anthem; we
formed our First Republic with this anthem. Answering the question how
this initiative can be countered Hayrikian noted that serious public
discussions should be launched and further consistency should be
exerted during the hearings of the draft law in the National Assembly.

Today we can already see which political forces support the present
anthem and which forces want to change it. We do not know how this
issue will be settled. We will see this once the draft law on the
anthem enters the National Assembly’s agenda. No matter how this issue
will be settled, one thing is important – when we hear the national
anthem we should not only be impressed by its beautiful lyrics but we
should feel like looking back at our history and our victories. The
anthem should inspire us to live and work in our Homeland.

President Kocharyan visited Vayots Dzor and Syunik marzes

President Kocharyan visited Vayots Dzor and Syunik marzes

ArmRadio.am
02.09.2006 12:48

September 1 President Robert Kocharyan paid a working visit to Vayots Dzor
and Syunik marzes.

In Jermuk city the President and the leaders ship of the region discussed
the prospects of tourism development.

In Syunik marz Robert Kocharyan learned about the process of construction of
the new Kapan-Meghri highway and Iran-Armenia gas pipeline. The President
visited also Meghri checkpoint.

During the consultations with the leadership of the marz reference was made
to the existing problems, the prospects of their resolution and future
programs.