Government shortens VAT refund waiting cycle for businesses

Save

Share

 11:53, 11 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 11, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian government is introducing amendments to the tax code that will enable businesses to get their VAT refunds every month, instead of the currently active quarterly refunds.

The head of Armenia’s tax authority Edvard Hovhannisyan said at the Cabinet meeting that the move is aimed at enabling businesses to more periodically and quickly manage their working capital and inject it into the economy.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Armenian Ambassador briefs US students on Armenian Genocide, Artsakh War

Public Radio of Armenia
– Public Radio of Armenia

On March 11, H.E. Varuzhan Nersesyan, Ambassador of the Republic of Armenia to the USA, provided an online lecture for the students of Dickenson Law faculty of the Penn University in the framework of the course “Crimes against Humanity.”

Ambassador Nersesyan briefed the students about the Armenian Genocide perpetrated by the Ottoman Turkey in 1915 and highlighted the importance of the international recognition as a means of prevention for future genocides.

In this context the Ambassador mentioned the denial policy by Turkey and recalled some of the documents dated back to the beginning of the 20th century indicating the Genocide committed against Armenians.

The Ambassador once again expressed his gratitude to the countries which recognized the Armenian Genocide and emphasized the importance of the resolutions passed by the US Congress in 2019.

During the lecture the Ambassador presented the challenges and the humanitarian crisis after the war unleashed by Azerbaijan against Artsakh. In this context he stressed the issue of Armenian prisoners of war and captured civilians and inhuman treatment depicted in numerous footages uploaded in social media.

The lecture continued in Q&A format.

Military fell into Pashinyan’s ‘PR trap’, says human rights activist –

Panorama, Armenia

Human rights activist Ruben Melikyan says Colonel-General Onik Gasparyan should not have accepted his dismissal as chief of the army’s General Staff instead of challenging its legality in the Administrative Court.

Earlier on Wednesday, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said that Gasparyan was automatically relieved of his post by virtue of law.

"It was incomprehensible to me that yesterday former General Staff Chief Onik Gasparyan admitted that his duties were terminated," Melikyan told a news conference on Thursday, referring to the recent developments around the General Staff.

According to the human rights activist, there were lawyers who insisted that Onik Gasparyan could and should have remained in office, but the senior army officer instead decided to apply to the Administrative Court to challenge the legality of Pashinyan’s order to fire him.

Ruben Melikyan said that many people had different expectations from the military, particularly Onik Gasparyan, adding there were people who warned against heroizing them not to be “bitterly disappointed” later.

Reflecting on Nikol Pashinyan's meeting with the military’s top brass on Wednesday, Ruben Melikyan first noted that the military has nothing to do with PR and could not imagine that their move to stand up for a moment to greet Pashinyan would be presented in such a way that they allegedly greeted him very warmly.

"But according to the information I obtained, the military has raised rather sharp questions. But it does not seem to matter at all. It's just that those people [senior officers] have no idea about PR, that's why they fell into the trap. However, I think that person [Pashinyan] is not worthy of even a five-second reception. I have a much more radical position on this issue and believe that people dealing with the main culprit of our national disaster are not worthy of a handshake,” he said.

The human rights activist said it is time for people to take risky steps, especially when there is nothing to lose anymore.

"We have lost our homeland, our compatriots … our dignity. We can no longer walk with our heads held high as we have lost that right. If we do not restore our dignity, it is too early to talk about the rest," he said.

Commenting on the attitude of President Armen Sarkissian on the matter, Melikyan said that the role of the president was negative.

"He shouldn't have taken any step other than to challenge Pashinyan's decision to the Constitutional Court, because he had confirmed that it was unconstitutional. This means the president of the country has been discredited,” he added.

Azerbaijan deliberately undermines implementation of trilateral statements – Armenian MFA

Public Radio of Armenia
March 5 2021

The Article 9 of the November 9 trilateral statement does not mention the establishment of any corridor, Spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Anna Naghdalyan has stated.

The comments come after the President of Azerbaijan noted that “the new transport corridor will pass through the historical territories of Azerbaijan, Zangezur, connecting the main part of Azerbaijan with its integral part, Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic, and Turkey.”

“With such a provocative statement, calling Zangezur an “Azerbaijani historical land” and making reference to an imaginary corridor, the President of Azerbaijan deliberately undermines the implementation of the November 9 and January 11 trilateral statements. Such rhetoric contradicts Azerbaijan’s obligations; it is a blatant challenge to international law, it in no way contributes to the stability of the region and threatens all states in the region,” Naghdalyan stated.

Aliyev also stated that “the conflict has been resolved and the UN Security Council resolutions have been implemented.”

The statements of the President of Azerbaijan that Azerbaijan has resolved the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict by the use of force once again demonstrates who unleashed the war and who is leading the region through new challenges and further destabilization. As always, Azerbaijan distorts the provisions of the UN Security Council resolutions, while these same resolutions express their support for the Minsk Group peace process, headed by the Minsk Group Co-Chairs,” the Spokesperson said.

“With his statements on the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process, the President of Azerbaijan contradicts the position of the international community, and first of all, the position of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship and Co-Chair countries, which clearly emphasizes the imperative of comprehensive settlement of the conflict. It is obvious to us that the attempt to suppress the right of the people of Artsakh to self-determination through the use of force cannot create grounds for the settlement of the conflict. The realization of the right of the people of Artsakh to self-determination and the elimination of the consequences of the war are the core elements of the peace process,” she stated.

Artur Vanetsyan: The claims by authorities about captives are false and despicable

Panorama, Armenia
March 5 2021

The authorities, who lost the war, signed an humiliating agreement with Azerbaijan and do not represent  Armenia's interests, have neither moral nor legal capacity to solve the issue of the captives," former Chief of the National Security Service (NSS) Artur Vanetsyan told reporters on Friday.  

Vanetsyan, who is now the leader of Homeland opposition party, insisted only the new authorities may negotiate with Azerbaijani government through other lenses and solve the matter and return the captives within a short period of time.

"The false claims voiced by current leaders that the protests organised by the opposition Homeland Salvation Movement impede the process of returning the captives, are simply despicable and are aimed to cover up own incapacity while putting the blame on others," said Vanetsyan. 

The former NSS Chief emphasized that the captives can return within days once there is a change of power in Armenia and when the authorities are replaced by national forces who can represent Armenia's interests, have the capacity and possibility to form good relations with influential circles in third countries.  

The Economist: After the war – Armenia’s army turns on its prime minister

The Economist
March 4 2021

But he refuses to resign

EuropeMar 6th 2021 edition

Listen to this story

Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.

There are no tanks on the street in Yerevan. But Mr Pashinyan is fighting for his political life. On February 25th dozens of officers, including the country’s top soldier, Onik Gasparyan, demanded the prime minister’s resignation, accusing him of incompetence. Mr Pashinyan called this an attempted coup, refused to step down and ordered Mr Gasparyan to do so instead. (So far, he has not.)

Tensions in Armenia have been brewing since November, when Mr Pashinyan signed an armistice with Azerbaijan, ending a war over Nagorno-Karabakh, a separatist ethnic-Armenian enclave inside Azerbaijan. More than 6,000 people died in the fighting. Armenian defences were pummelled by Turkish drones and overrun by Azerbaijani ground forces. Under the ceasefire agreement, Armenia gave up control of swathes of land which it had captured around Karabakh three decades earlier. The enclave’s status remains unresolved. Some 2,000 Russian troops have been deployed there to keep the peace.

To many Armenians, persuaded by the army and the government that the fighting was going their way, the surrender came as a shock and a betrayal. Mr Pashinyan immediately came under fire. The opposition blamed him for provoking the war and losing the peace. Protesters stormed government buildings. The army (and the Kremlin) bristled after Mr Pashinyan claimed that Russia’s Iskander missiles, which Armenia used at least once during the war, had turned out to be duds. He backtracked after a phone call with Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin.

The protests have attracted no more than a few thousand people. But those who turn up seem to be spoiling for a fight. “Pashinyan sold out my homeland and my people,” says Hrachya Abramyan, a veteran of both Karabakh wars, at a rally in front of the parliament. “If he does not resign, we will grab him by the ears and throw him out like a dog.” The opposition parties have not warmed to an offer of snap elections, presumably because they continue to trail in the polls. Instead they propose a transitional government. Some appear on the verge of endorsing an actual coup. “I don’t like the idea,” says Davit Harutyunyan, a former minister. “But if I feel that without taking the next step we risk losing the country and civil war, then definitely.”

Mr Pashinyan, a former journalist, came to power in 2018, when exasperation with decades of cronyism overflowed into mass protests, bringing down the government of Serzh Sargsyan, his predecessor. Yet the tide that propelled Mr Pashinyan into power has ebbed. In elections two years ago, he won 70% of the vote. Today only 39% of Armenians want him in charge. He had already faced criticism for his handling of the economy and the covid-19 crisis. He has made no new friends by shrugging off the blame for the lost war.

Many see a Russian hand in the army’s move against Mr Pashinyan. Yet Russia may not want the Armenian leader gone, so much as tamed. Mr Pashinyan was once eager to loosen Armenia from Russia’s grip and to improve relations with Western powers. That is no longer possible. Hobbling from a lost war, squeezed between two old enemies and frustrated by Western inaction, Armenia now depends on Russia’s security guarantees more than ever, no matter who is in charge. ■

This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline "After the war"

Turkish press: ‘Embargoes are targeting Turkish defense industry’

Gökhan Ergöçün   |02.03.2021

ISTANBUL 

The Turkish defense industry is being targeted with embargoes both overt and covert, Turkey's Defense Industries Presidency said in a written statement on Tuesday.

Turkey will continue towards its goal of a fully independent defense industry with its determination to design, develop, and produce national and indigenous systems and technologies, the statement stressed after a meeting of the Defense Industry Executive Committee.

The meeting, chaired by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, discussed new military systems for the country's armed forces.

"As part of this, various projects on communication and information systems, ammunition and missiles, various platforms, modernization, and new technologies were decided on," the statement said.

In recent years, Turkey's defense and aviation companies made significant strides in research and development, as well as production and exports. Turkey is among six countries in the world that can produce its own UAVs.

After certain foreign suppliers started to impose embargoes due to Turkey's support for Azerbaijan in last year's Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Turkish firms began focusing more on local production.

Last October, Canada suspended exports of some defense products to Turkey over allegations that its technology was being used in the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Karabakh conflict

In 1991, the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh (Upper Karabakh), internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territory, and seven adjacent regions.

When new clashes erupted on Sept. 27, 2020, the Armenian army launched attacks on civilians and Azerbaijani forces and even violated humanitarian cease-fire agreements.

During the six-week conflict, Azerbaijan liberated several cities and nearly 300 settlements and villages, while at least 2,802 of its soldiers were martyred.

The two countries signed a Russian-brokered agreement on Nov. 10 to end the fighting and work towards a comprehensive resolution.

On Jan. 11, the leaders of Russia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia signed a pact to develop economic ties and infrastructure to benefit the entire region. It included the establishment of a trilateral working group on Karabakh.

The cease-fire is seen as a victory for Azerbaijan and a defeat for Armenia, whose armed forces have withdrawn in line with the agreement.

Prime Minister Pashinyan commemorates victims of Sumgait pogroms

 11:42,

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 27, ARMENPRESS. On the occasion of the 33rd anniversary of the Sumgait pogroms, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan visited the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial to pay tribute to the memory of the victims of the violent massacres that targeted the Armenians in the city of Sumgait, Azerbaijan from February 27 to 29 in 1988.  

PM Pashinyan laid flowers and a wreath at the monuments honoring the victims.

Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinyan, Speaker of Parliament Ararat Mirzoyan and other government officials accompanied the Prime Minister, his office said.

Turkish Press: Will Biden save Pashinian from trouble?

Daily Sabah, Turkey
Feb 26 2021
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (C) walks with his supporters to protest the coup attempt, Yerevan, Armenia, Feb. 25, 2021. (EPA Photo)

Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian is in trouble. The country’s military just issued a memorandum urging his government to step down. Describing the ultimatum as a “coup attempt,” Pashinian dismissed the military’s top commander and took to the streets with his supporters. That former President Robert Kocharian and former Prime Minister Vazgen Manukyan endorsed the military’s statement shows that Armenia’s politics are out of control.

Hardly anyone finds it surprising that Armenia, which suffered a humiliating defeat in the second Karabakh war, is experiencing turmoil. Tensions had been building up, as Armenians attempted to find someone to hold responsible for their defeat.

Under heavy pressure, Pashinian infuriated Moscow by claiming that Armenia’s Russian-made ballistic missiles did not work. The military, in turn, blames what happened on the prime minister’s misguided foreign policy.

To be fair, all of those claims are partly true.

Pashinian, a pro-American politician, could not strike a healthy balance between the Russian influence over his country and his government’s policy of closer cooperation with the Western alliance.

Failing to appreciate Azerbaijan’s military preparedness, support from Turkey and active diplomacy with Russia, he ended up making futile calls to Western capitals.

The solution was to hand over Azerbaijan’s sovereign territory, which was under Armenian occupation, to Baku. Instead, Pashinian, suffering from jingoism, started an unwinnable war.

It is no secret that Armenia’s Russian-made defense equipment proved ineffective against the Turkish armed drones.

For three decades, Azerbaijan made preparations to liberate Nagorno-Karabakh, whereas the Armenians planned its defense.

Let’s not underestimate Yerevan’s preparations involving Russian weapons. The Armenians built an impressive line of defense, circling hilltops in mountainous terrain, with tanks and artillery.

Indeed, the Armenian forces dealt heavy blows to Azerbaijan’s military in the early stages. Over the following days, however, armed drones devastated Yerevan’s line of defense and determined the outcome of the war.

Armenia, whose hopes were tied to Russian weapons and political support, is unmistakably disappointed in Moscow’s wartime policy.

Pashinian’s attempt to blame the defeat on Russia, however, disturbed the fragile balance.

Pro-Russian soldiers and politicians thus joined forces to remove the Armenian prime minister from power. Pashinian, who came to power on the back of popular protests in 2018, is unlikely to keep his seat after his humiliation in Nagorno-Karabakh.

He has to choose between resignation, early elections or the threat of a coup, in which the military and the opposition will be complicit – as was the case in Egypt.

Several questions now need answering: Is the Kremlin merely threatening the Armenian prime minister or intent on ending his rule? Or do the Russians want to finish what they started before Joe Biden, the White House’s new resident, takes action?

Will the Joe Biden administration rush to Pashinian’s aid, per its commitment to “defend” democracies? We will soon find out.

Whereas Moscow expressed concern and called for a peaceful resolution, Ankara condemned the coup attempt unequivocally. Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said that Ankara was “opposed to coups and coup attempts wherever in the world they may take place.”

The Turkish government’s opposition to the coup attempt is, first and foremost, a matter of principle.

That policy is directly related to the fact that Turkey experienced a coup attempt just five years ago.

Moreover, Turks do not want Armenia to suffer from political turmoil or to set the stage for a civil war.

Turkey’s preference is to promote peace, cooperation and economic integration in the South Caucasus. Hence the proposed establishment of a six-party mechanism.

Stability in the Caucasus, the Caspian and Central Asia would facilitate the transportation of energy and trade – which serve Turkey’s interests. The creation of a land corridor between Turkey and the Turkic republics via Nakhchivan, too, is good news for Ankara.

Peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia, normalization between Turkey and Armenia, and Armenia’s reintegration to address its economic problems are key to stability in the Caucasus.

The rise to power of coup plotters, who will launch a new war against Azerbaijan, or Armenia’s deterioration into a failed state due to Russian-American competition, would create many problems, including irregular migration.

It would seem that the coup attempt in Armenia will test the Biden administration’s commitment to containing Russia and defending democracies.

Shushi is an integral part of Artsakh – Foreign Ministry

Panorama, Armenia
Feb 26 2021

The Foreign Ministry of Artsakh on Thursday sent a memorandum to international organizations on the occasion of the visit of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev to the occupied territories of Artsakh.

The document, in particular, notes that after the end of the 44-day war imposed on Artsakh by Azerbaijan with the support of Turkey and mercenaries from various terrorist groups, the Azerbaijani authorities have set a course to impose a fait accompli created through the use of military force in blatant violation of norms of international law. According to the document, among the instruments for implementing this policy are the visits of the President of Azerbaijan to the seized territories, the most striking of which is Aliyev's visit to the city of Shushi, where he made a number of statements replete with outrageous threats and militant rhetoric containing outright hatred towards the Armenian people, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. 

The Memorandum also states that the provocative and inflammatory nature of the visits and the accompanying statements evidence Azerbaijan's intent to disrupt the resumption of the negotiation process on a comprehensive settlement of the Azerbaijan-Karabakh conflict and to keep the conflict unsettled. Such destructive and defiant behavior of Azerbaijan should be strictly condemned by the international community, the Memorandum reads.

The document underlines that the people of Artsakh exercised their right to self-determination and established statehood in those territories. As noted in the document, the failure to respect this fundamental right is not only a violation of human rights, but is also one of the core sources of serious threats to security in the region.

The Memorandum notes that any legislative and administrative actions of Azerbaijan to change the status of the territories of the Republic of Artsakh, including the expropriation of land and properties, the transfer of populations to the occupied territories and the incorporation of the occupied territories, are invalid under international law and cannot change their status. No territorial gains resulting from the threat or use of force should be recognized as legal.

The document notes that the current military occupation by Azerbaijan of the territories of the Republic of Artsakh, including the city of Shushi, also cannot change their status. The town of Shushi is an integral part of the Artsakh Republic in a number of aspects, including territorially, culturally, economically and historically. Any attempt to seize it is a gross violation of the territorial integrity of Artsakh.

The Memorandum underlines that only a just settlement of the Azerbaijan-Karabakh conflict – one that will eliminate its root cause associated with Azerbaijan’s unwillingness to recognize the rights of the people of Artsakh – will reverse the consequences of the illegal use of military force by Azerbaijan and re-institute the primacy of the principle of peaceful resolution of disputes.