National Salvation Movement Protests Judicial Council Appointments

January 22,  2020



National Salvation Movement supporters protest in front of parliament on Jan. 22

National Salvation Movement leaders and supporters staged a protest outside parliament on Friday in response to the appointment of two members to Armenia’s Supreme Judicial Council, who were installed only by votes of the ruling My Step bloc.

On Friday, Armenia’s National Assembly voted to install Gagik Jahangiryan and Davit Khachaturian to serve on the judicial body. Opposition lawmakers refused to participate in the vote.

The National Salvation Movement accused Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and his My Step alliance of appointing of stacking the judiciary with justices that are loyal to their agenda.

Armenian Revolutionary Federation member Sevak Nazaryan singled out Jahangiryan in comments during the protest, saying that the newly-appointed judge has a checkered past, accusing the authorities of violating Armenia’s Constitution and appointing an individual who will fulfill the will of the authorities.

“It is clear for us that [the vote] has only one purpose: to abscond the judicial branch of the government, which despite threats by Nikol Pashinyan, has shown that it is able to maintain its independence,” said Nazaryan.

“They [the ruling bloc] want to usurp the judiciary so they can continue their illegal efforts of pressuring, arresting and their unlawful judicial rulings, which they think will avert a change in government,” added Nazaryan, who accused the ruling bloc of violating the constitution and the law only to prolong their leadership.

“This is why we have gathered here to raise our voices in protest and alert all citizens that with every day that Nikol Pashinyan continues to remain in power he brings renewed lawlessness and strikes new blows to our statehood, with which he is destroying the foundations of our homeland,” said Nazaryan.

Armenia And Azerbaijan: The Business Of Reconciliation

International Business Times
Jan 24 2021

  • The recent conflict caused many Armenians to flee Karabakh, tragically mirroring events of the 1990s.
  • Peace must be girded on mutual economic dependence, as France and Germany demonstrated with the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community in the wake of the Second World War.
  • Reconciliation founded on economic exchange is the ultimate means for a durable peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
  • See this article with the full mobile experience.
  • Visit IBT.com to see the latest stories.

In the recent conflict between our two nations, Armenia and Azerbaijan, the diplomatic hand of the West has been conspicuously absent. Tellingly, the first talks between our respective leaders since the November ceasefire took place with one other person in the room – President Vladimir Putin.

President Joe Biden has stated a resolve to change this, chiding the Trump administration’s passivity during the conflict. Yet others may question why it’s necessary, given America’s geographical remoteness from the South Caucasus. Is it perhaps not preferable for Russia to lead peace efforts?

Given the entanglement of NATO in the region, and the risk – were these efforts to fail – of regional conflagration at the junction of Europe and the Middle East, the U.S. cannot let events unfurl. Given limited progress in recent talks, the ceasefire shall remain fragile because it doesn’t provide for reconciliation between our communities, the fundament for lasting peace. Rather, economic engagement – between the nations, its peoples and from the West – holds that promise.

This is not to say acrimony simply dissolves in prosperity. History has shown us that arguments for a peace dividend are no match for the emotion of nationalist rhetoric. Yet in affording a mechanism for exchange where contact can be established, reconciliation between Armenians and Azerbaijanis can find some purchase. Because it is a lack of connection we must first resolve.

Where once we used to live as neighbors, our communities now know nothing of the other. During the 1990s conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh – the region at the heart of the dispute – approximately one million of our peoples became refugees. Azerbaijanis fled Armenia and vice versa. Hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis were forced to leave Karabakh. Then an impassable border fell. Segregated, fear and mistrust of the other grew. Seeping into our national psyches, it bound our identities against the enemy across the border.

National identity may not be negotiable, but the price of tomatoes is. It therefore makes an easy starting point: a human-level contact to begin demystifying the fog between us; stripping existential anxiety of the other for trust. Where nationalists may blather about incompatibility, Azerbaijanis and Armenians trading would be its living refutation.

But for this, we must live together once again. The recent conflict caused many Armenians to flee Karabakh, tragically mirroring events of the 1990s. Now they must be encouraged to return, as should Azerbaijanis, through economic incentives – whatever form (tax benefits, business grants or subsidies) this may take. For many, at first, this will not be enough: The wounds of the conflict remain raw. However, for others, it will: all that is needed for drip-drip-drip of reconciliation to begin, and the path to be lit for others to feel safe in following.

Further illumination can flow from initiatives that actively encourage partnership. Seed money, for instance, could be provided for joint enterprises between Azerbaijanis and Armenians to start businesses together. Schemes like this that bake in collaboration can reveal what a future together holds.

We need not wait for the final details of a negotiated peace deal to begin. Indeed, the longer it takes the benefits of peace to flow, the more precarious it shall become. Conversely, tangible economic development can give people a vested interest in supporting political compromise, making it easier for the governments to sell to their respective domestic audiences. Though economics is never sufficient for peace, in this way it can strengthen processes towards settlement.

It also paves the way for an incremental renormalization of relations between our two nations. Peace must be girded on mutual economic dependence, as France and Germany demonstrated with the establishment of the European Coal and Steel Community in the wake of the Second World War. The force of logic is even stronger today: It makes no sense to deepen integration in the global marketplace whilst ignoring our closest neighbor.

Though the West may feel side-lined, it can deploy its tools of soft power to encourage these kinds of initiatives. In addition, its governments could open the door to private industry to bring investment to bear on the much-needed reconstruction of infrastructure that – in providing immediate jobs and a platform for opportunity – will help cement the peace.

Many of these things will no doubt need to happen in concert with the two leading major peace brokers– Turkey and Russia. Whilst some in the West may not relish this prospect, it is what the situation demands if stability is our ambition. Biden appears reconciled to these compromises, as his commitment to re-join the Iranian Nuclear deal alongside Moscow and renew the Russian-U.S. nuclear treaty later in January suggest.

The opportunity, therefore, must now be grasped. Reconciliation founded on economic exchange is the ultimate means for a durable peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan. At the same time, it offers the West an opportunity to re-establish its influence and shape events in the region. As the economic lingo goes, that’s a ‘win-win’.

Georgi Vanyan is Chairman of the Caucasus Center of Peace-Making Initiatives. Emin Milli is Founder and former director of Meydan TV, Azerbaijan’s largest independent media outlet.

Turkish press: Unique Imperial Pavilion stands test of time in Turkey’s northwestern İzmit

A chamber decorated with historical furniture at the Imperial Pavilion, Kocaeli, northwestern Turkey, Jan. 15, 2021. (AA Photo)

Kasr-ı Hümayun (the Imperial Pavilion) of northwestern Turkey's Kocaeli province, which took its modern form under Sultan Abdülaziz's reign between 1861-1876, and was the historical location where republic founder Mustafa Kemal Atatürk met with journalists to share his idea of the republic, still stands today and retains its magnificent grandeur.

The pavilion, which is located in the city of Izmit, has weathered earthquakes and fires and has served many Ottoman sultans, as well as Atatürk and other historical figures like French author Claude Farrere.

Kocaeli Museum Director Serkan Gedük touched upon the importance of the Imperial Pavilion, which is also known as the “Little Palace,” “Hunting Pavilion” and “Sultan's Mansion,” and said that it was the only palatial structure constructed outside Istanbul apart from those in the empire's former capitals in Bursa and Edirne.

An outside view of the historical Imperial Pavilion in Kocaeli, northwestern Turkey, Jan. 15, 2021. (AA Photo)

Gedük went on to explain the historical journey of the pavilion, saying that it was first built during the period of Ottoman Sultan Murad IV (1623-1640) as a wooden structure but had to be rebuilt due to disasters like earthquakes and fires.

The final form of the pavilion was designed by Armenian-Ottoman architect Garabet Amira Balyan on the order of Sultan Abdülaziz during the 19th century. Balyan was most famous for his work in constructing the Dolmabahçe Palace, which served as the sultan's residence in the final centuries of the empire. “The structure reflects the typical features of 19th-century civil architecture, which was a time of westernization. The influence of baroque and imperial styles of the time's architecture can be clearly felt,” Gedük told Anadolu Agency (AA).

Gedük then detailed the architectural structure of the pavilion. “Although many sources say that the Imperial Pavilion is a two-floored stone structure, it also houses a basement,” and added that the historical pavilion was built through a marriage of elegance and simplicity.

Gedük then emphasized the decorative beauty of the pavilion, stating that the interior ornamentation of the structure was completed by decorator Sepon Bezirciyan in 1858 and it was such a success that it gained him the title of a palatial decorator, which would later allow him to be one of the artists who helped decorate the interior of Dolmabahçe Palace in Istanbul.

“We also know that the ornamentation of the structure has been repaired and that the adornment of the ceiling was done by French painter Sasson as an oil painting on top of plaster,” Gedük said and added that there were several symbols and motifs on the ceiling painting including the Turkish flag, instruments of war, justice and music, along with the tughra, or signature, of Sultan Abdülaziz. Other than these, the painting also contains depictions of nature with flowers, fruits and animals as well as grand scenes.

Gedük stated that one of the most important roles that the Imperial Pavilion played in its almost two-century-long life was hosting a meeting between Atatürk and journalists. “Atatürk arranged a meeting with journalists in the Imperial Pavilion in 1923. He shared with the journalists the idea of the republic, which was to be declared on Oct. 29 later that year, and asked for their opinion,” Gedük said. He underlined the importance of the meeting by saying that the new path of Turkey was decided in that meeting and the foundations of the republic were laid.

The Imperial Pavilion was used as the Provincial Government Office until 1967, then it was converted into the Izmit museum and finally in 2005, after restoration, it was decided that the historic structure would serve as a palatial museum, a service it still carries today.

Former PACE member sentenced to 4 years in prison for taking bribes from Azerbaijan

Save

Share

 13:35, 12 January, 2021

YEREVAN, JANUARY 12, ARMENPRESS. A Milan court has sentenced former member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) Luca Volontè, representing Italy, to 4 years in prison for taking bribes from Azerbaijan, La Repubblica reports.

The Milan Police and Prosecution have launched a criminal case against Luca Volontè in February 2016 for taking 2,4 million Euro bribe from Azerbaijan during 2012-2013. Instead, Baku was using him at the Italian parliament and the PACE for its benefit. The money has been transferred to him by the head of the Azerbaijani delegation to PACE, but the coordination works have been carried out by a Brussels-based Azerbaijani lobbying company.

The criminal case launched against Volontè consisted of two chapters-bribery and money laundering.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Russian, Hungarian FMs to discuss situation around Nagorno Karabakh

Save

Share

 12:05,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 15, ARMENPRESS. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Hungary’s Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Péter Szijjártó will discuss the situation around Nagorno Karabakh, Russian foreign ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said at a press briefing today.

“On January 22 the meeting of Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Hungarian Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade Péter Szijjártó will take place in Moscow. They are expected to discuss a number of issues of the international agenda, including the situation around Ukraine and Nagorno Karabakh”, Zakharova said, adding that the ministers will also discuss other issues of bilateral interest.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

CivilNet: Putin Meets with Pashinyan and Aliyev in Moscow

CIVILNET.AM

22:05

✓Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan meets with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.

✓On January 10, bodies of 14 Armenian servicemen were found and removed from Kovsakan (Zangilan).

✓More than a thousand Artsakh citizens live in temporary apartments in different regions of Armenia.

✓Armenia’s President Armen Sarkissian says that every Armenian must take responsibility for the country’s destiny.

Turkey’s goal in Caucasus was to increase Russia’s role

Jerusalem Post



[While Turkey frequently spreads misinformation via its state media,
imprisons journalists and dissidents and bashes the US, it is growing
closer to Russia.]

By SETH J. FRANTZMAN
JANUARY 2, 2021 

Turkey and Russia are increasingly becoming strategic partners in an
effort to work with Iran and remove the US from the Middle East. This
is Turkey’s overall goal, and the recent conflicts and chaos that it
has spread from Syria to Libya, the Mediterranean and Caucasus are
designed to partition these areas into Russian and Turkish spheres of
influence.

Turkey has encouraged its lobbyists in the US to claim that Ankara is
doing “geopolitics” designed to be a “bulwark” against Russia, using
Cold War-era terminology to encourage Westerners to believe that
Ankara is on the side of Washington against Moscow. The reality,
however, is that Turkey’s goal is to work with Russia and Iran to
reduce US influence.

This has been the result in every area that Ankara has invaded and
involved itself. Turkey worked with Russia to partition parts of
northern Syria, removing US forces and spreading extremism. In Libya,
a conflict that the US was once involved in has now become a
playground for Turkish-backed militias. The recent war between
Azerbaijan and Armenia was likewise designed to bring Turkey and
Russia into direct contact in the southern Caucasus, remove US
influence and partition the area.

Evidence for this can be found in the agreement to end the war that
saw Russian peacekeepers and soldiers increase their role in
Nagorna-Karabakh, an autonomous Armenian region in Azerbaijan. Turkey
prodded Baku into war against Armenians there, causing massive damage
and forcing 50,000 to flee.

For Turkey, the attacks on Armenian civilians were a success,
replicating Turkish-backed ethnic-cleansing in Afrin where Kurds were
expelled in January 2018. The model was the same in Nagorna-Karabakh.
Turkey sent extremists, accused of beheading people, to ransack
churches and force Armenians out. A hundred years after the Armenian
genocide carried out by the Ottoman regime in 2015, Turkey wanted to
continue the process. Much as in 1915, the goal would in the end would
bring renewed Russian involvement in the Caucasus.

RUSSIAN RESCUE workers have now reconstructed more than 2,150
buildings in Nagorna-Karabakh, according to Russia’s TASS media. "As
many as 251 buildings have been reconstructed so far, including an
apartment building, 245 private houses, two government buildings, an
infrastructure facility and two social facilities," the statement
reads.

Some 2,600 more buildings damaged in the war may now receive Russian
support. Russia views this as a kind of police action, going in to
stop squabbling by former Soviet socialist republics. This is how
Ankara views the region as well: from the Ottoman empire's point of
view. That is why Turkey keeps talking about rewriting the Lausanne
Treaty and other agreements made after the First World War. Ankara’s
invasion of Syria and setting up a dozen bases in northern Iraq, as
well as involvement in Libya and the Eastern Mediterranean, is part of
this.

Turkey sells its involvement with different public relations campaigns
in different places. In Washington it sells this as “geopolitics,”
pretending to be a US ally. In fact, Turkey is rapidly buying Russian
arms.

Turkey and Russia met in the Russian resort city of Sochi last week to
talk strategy. Turkey’s state media says “the top Turkish and Russian
diplomats met Tuesday to discuss international issues and help prepare
for a meeting of the two countries’ presidents. Turkish foreign
minister Mevlut Cavusoglu met with his Russian counterpart Sergey
Lavrov in Sochi, ahead of a planned meeting of the high-level
Russian-Turkish Cooperation Council, set to be co-chaired by their
presidents.”

WHILE TURKEY frequently spreads misinformation via its state media,
imprisons journalists and dissidents and bashes the US, it is growing
closer to Russia. It is now four years since Russia’s ambassador to
Turkey was assassinated. That incident has been quietly pushed aside
in favor of the new alliance.

Turkey, Russia and Iran see this as a pragmatic working relationship,
growing out of the Astana process of 2016 that was supposed to carve
up Syria into areas of influence and remove the US from eastern Syria.
The end goal is the same: Remove the US and give each member of this
new alliance their respective area of control.

Turkey has tried to hint to Israel, as well as the US, that it wants
“reconciliation.” However when Turkey’s president Recep Tayyip Erdogan
speaks, he continues his militarist drive. His sycophants despise the
US and Europe. They use the term “reconciliation” only because they
think gullible Western media will buy them time and perhaps an in with
the new US administration to continue their work with Russia and Iran.

The US once had a wider role in the Caucasus. Georgia expected
American support in 2008 when it wandered into a war with Russia over
disputed areas. When Georgia was defeated, the US and European role
there declined. Later in 2014, Ukraine expected more US support but
saw Russia annex Crimea.

The war that Turkey prodded Azerbaijan into in September last year was
the final end of US involvement in the Caucasus. While Turkey sold the
war as being needed to confront Iran and Russia, Ankara was in fact
working with Tehran and Moscow.

The goal was to bring Russia into the southern Caucasus as
peacekeepers and to remove any Western influence. This is because
Armenia had been seeking to drift away from the Russia orbit. Nikol
Pashinyan wanted to seek closer ties to the West. To break this,
Moscow allowed Turkish-backed Azerbaijan to launch a war to weaken him
in the summer and fall of 2019. Weakened and defeated, he sued for
peace – and Russia and Turkey moved into disputed areas with Baku’s
acquiescence.

Now Armenia is totally hostage to Moscow and Ankara. Turkey
wants this. Azerbaijan, which sought for decades to grow closer to the
US and also to Israel as a strategic partner, has now also seen itself
cornered by Ankara. The end result is more Iranian, Russian and
Turkish control, and a weakening of independent southern Caucasus
states.

WESTERN MEDIA is fed stories about how the Turkish-Iranian-Russian
triangle is destined to clash because of historic Ottoman, Persian and
Russian imperial goals, or because they are Sunni, Shi’ite and
Christian countries. This is a misreading of history. They are more
likely to work together against their common enemies in the West, and
to further their joint authoritarian and military agendas.

They share much in common as rising powers in the world, seeking to
end the unipolar world of US hegemony that grew out of the Cold War.
Those in Washington who see Turkey through a Cold War lens are wrong
about Turkey’s overall agenda. The agenda of Ankara is always to
weaken and reduce the US role in the Middle East and to increase the
Russian and Iranian role. In every invasion Ankara has performed so
far, it has sought to increase Russia and Iran’s power – and to not
only weaken America, but to also weaken any groups that want democracy
or a more free press, and to bring in extremists and authoritarians.

John F. Kennedy in 1960 argued that the world was not just divided
into a Soviet and American camp, but rather those countries that were
“free” as opposed to those who aren't. He understood that
authoritarians prefer to work together; that is what is happening in
the Caucasus.



 

UK wants new drones in wake of Azerbaijan military success

The Guardian, UK
Dec 28 2020

MoD wants to procure cheaper armed drones for UK as it studies lessons from recent conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh


The UK’s military is expected to embark on a new armed drone programme in response to Azerbaijan’s controversial use of the technology in its victory over Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Defence officials believe that Azerbaijan’s use of cheaper Turkish drones in the six-week autumn war was crucial in defeating the Armenians, and forcing them to cede control of territory in the disputed Caucasus region.

Ministry of Defence sources added that the UK wanted to procure its own cheaper drones as part of the five-year defence review due to be unveiled early in 2021, despite warnings about the risks of the proliferation of deadly unmanned aircraft.

Earlier this month Ben Wallace, the UK defence secretary, said that Turkish TB2 drones were an example of how other countries were now “leading the way”.

The drones, he added, have “been responsible for the destruction of hundreds of armoured vehicles and even air defence systems”, although there is video evidence that suggests they also killed many people in the Nagorno-Karabakh war.

In mid-October, graphic footage in black and white emerged from Clash Report, a Twitter and Telegram account closely linked to the Turkish military, appearing to show a string of TB2 strikes targeting Armenian positions against a backdrop of jingoistic music.

Other graphic footage posted by Azerbaijan’s defence ministry in October shows what are said to be TB2 drones picking out Armenian forces and using the information to call in deadly rocket fire from elsewhere.

Manufactured by Baykar Makina, the TB2 drones cost as little as $1m to $2m each according to analyst estimates, far less than the near $20m per drone paid by the British military for a fleet of 16 high-end, next-generation Protector drones manufactured by US specialist General Atomics.

The TB2 drones have a much shorter operating range of up to 150km, but are able to loiter in the air for up to 24 hours. Because they are cheaper, military forces can afford to lose some in action.

Turkey’s TB2 drones have been rapidly altering the military balance in the region, and have been heavily used in strikes against Kurdish opposition both inside and outside the country and in Libya, in the country’s civil war.

In the summer, on the eve of the conflict, Azerbaijan purchased TB2s from Turkey – two dozen on some estimates – and deployed them so quickly and effectively it is widely believed they were operated by Turkish pilots. Drone footage was also broadcast on digital billboards in the Azerbaijani capital of Baku.

“There’s a huge PR element to this,” said Rob Lee, a doctoral student at King’s College London’s war studies department, who has been closely following the conflict. “In an environment where there is not much independent information this helped the Azeri government to control the narrative.”

A Russian-brokered truce between the two sides was signed on 9 November. Azerbaijan kept the territory it had gained while Armenia was forced to withdraw from land it had controlled adjacent to Nagorno-Karabakh.

Around 5,000 soldiers from both sides were killed but analysts on the Oryx Blog, relying on publicly available pictures and video, estimated that Armenia lost 224 tanks compared with 36 from Azerbaijan. “The Azeris use of drones was decisive,” added Prof Michael Clarke, a distinguished fellow at the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), a military thinktank.

Several TB2 drones were downed by Armenian forces, revealing how Baykar is able to make them relatively cheaply. A report released by the Armenian National Committee of America in November included photos of components used in the damaged drone, including a navigation system from Garmin.


We are going to discuss conditions for his resignation – Tsarukyan about expected meeting with PM

Save

Share

 17:59,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS. President of ‘’Prosperous Armenia’’ Party Gagik Tsarukyan told the reporters that he will discuss the conditions for PM Pashinyan’s resignation during the meeting with the latter, ARMENPRESS reports Tsarukyan said at the parliament before the meeting with Pashinyan.

‘’We are going to discuss the conditions for his resignation. Our agenda has not changed’’, Tsarukyan tld the reporters.

Earlier, head of ‘’My step’’ bloc’s parliamentary faction Lilit Makunts had told that she possesses information that a meeting  may take place between PM Nikol Pashinyan and the heads of the 3 parliamentary factions.




Following war, Armenia and Azerbaijan reckon with unexploded ordnance

EurasiaNet.org
Dec 23 2020
Joshua Kucera Dec 23, 2020

Following the war between Armenians and Azerbaijanis in the 1990s, deminers spent decades and tens of millions of dollars clearing the former battleground of land mines and unexploded ordnance.

Now, after 44 days of renewed fighting, they have to start again.

According to a survey of local media reports, at least 11 people have been killed by leftover explosives following the cessation of hostilities on November 10.

In the deadliest single incident, four members of an Azerbaijani family who were visiting their former home in the region of Fuzuli were killed when their car hit a land mine on November 28, the Azerbaijani general prosecutor’s office reported.

The only member of the Russian peacekeeping mission who has thus far been killed in action was a sapper who died as a result of an explosion on December 17.

Among the other victims: an Azerbaijani sapper, another Azerbaijani civilian visiting his former home in Fuzuli, an Azerbaijani colonel working with Russian and Armenian colleagues to recover bodies from the battlefield, two Armenian sappers, and an Azerbaijani soldier.

Until the war started this September, the last fatality as a result of unexploded ordnance on what used to be the Armenian side of the line of control was registered in 2018. The last time someone other than a deminer died was in 2015. On the Azerbaijani side, the last fatal accident was recorded in January.

But following the war, in which Azerbaijan managed to retake a large part of the lands it had lost to Armenians in the first war, a large swath of territory has again been rendered deadly.  Much of that is due to the use by both sides of cluster munitions, which contain small bomblets intended to explode on impact but which have a high failure rate, “leaving duds that act like anti-personnel landmines for years and even decades,” Human Rights Watch said in a December 11 report on their use in the recent conflict.

There also has been some apparent laying of new anti-tank and anti-personnel land mines. The Azerbaijani prosecutor’s office said that the explosion that killed the family of four was the result of an anti-tank land mine laid by retreating Armenian forces. The Russian Defense Ministry said that the explosion that killed the Azerbaijani colonel (which also wounded a Russian peacekeeper) was caused by a mine. Halo Trust, the UK-based organization that carries out demining in Armenian-controlled Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding territories, said in a post-war report that “[n]ew use of anti-vehicle mines has also been reported” and that “[t]he extent of landmine contamination from the current conflict is unknown.”

Neither side has acknowledged using land mines in the recent conflict.

A spokesperson for the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) blamed Armenia for laying the mines that have been found on territory now controlled by Baku. “The Armenian army, while being pushed away, were putting mines almost everywhere in order to delay the Azerbaijani army,” the spokesperson, Sabina Sakarova, said in response to written questions from Eurasianet.

(ANAMA)

There are several countries and agencies already involved in the UXO-clearing process. On the Armenian-controlled side of the line of contact, Russian peacekeepers have been clearing up material, while Halo is carrying out assessments of the work that lies ahead.

On the Azerbaijani-controlled side, ANAMA’s work is being supplemented by Turkish military mine-clearance experts. Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry reported that 136 Turkish soldiers arrived in early December and have begun training their Azerbaijani counterparts. The Turkish soldiers themselves also will be involved in clearing Azerbaijan’s newly retaken territories.

The amount of ordnance reported to have already been cleared since the war ended is substantial.

Russian military engineers had neutralized more than 6,000 explosive objects as of December 17, a peacekeeping officer in Karabakh said. ANAMA says that the explosives it has found as of December 20 include 1,376 pieces of unexploded ordnance, 4,507 pieces of anti-personnel mines and 1,344 pieces of anti-tank mines.

But deminers on both sides are only beginning to assess the work ahead of them.

To clean up its newly retaken territories, ANAMA is planning a substantial expansion, to increase its staff from under 500 to on the order of 12,000-15,000, Sakarova said. Halo says it is planning to roughly double its staff, from 130 before the war up to 250.

Azerbaijani officials have given varying timelines as to how long clearing their side will take, but ANAMA’s head of operations, Idris Ismayilov, has said that "it will take up to 10 years to completely demine the territory but people would be able to return to their ancestral lands in between three and five years.”

Halo has not given an estimate of how long it will take to render the Armenian-controlled land safe, and organization officials did not respond to requests by Eurasianet for comment. But in an interview with local news website EVN Report, the organization’s director for Europe, Nick Smart, said that to clean up a single site – an ammunition dump just outside the regional capital of Stepanakert that was destroyed during the war – would take two years and $2.6 million.

The organization was still working on assessments of the cities of Stepanakert, Martakert, and Martuni. It hadn’t even started yet on surveying rural areas, “but I would imagine there will be a big problem there,” Smart said. “Planting season will be on us in no time. Farmers are going to want to get on and plow their fields and to do so right now would be very dangerous.”

 

Joshua Kucera is the Turkey/Caucasus editor at Eurasianet, and author of .

https://eurasianet.org/following-war-armenia-and-azerbaijan-reckon-with-unexploded-ordnance