Lebanon Leader Pulls Out of Arab Summit

Lebanon Leader Pulls Out of Arab Summit

Saturday March 19, 2005 6:16 PM
By JOSEPH PANOSSIAN

Associated Press Writer

BEIRUT, Lebanon (AP) – Lebanon’s pro-Syrian president said Saturday
that he will not attend an Arab summit because of political turmoil in
his country as investigators searched for clues to a car bomb that
rocked a largely Christian neighborhood in Beirut, injuring nine
people.

President Emile Lahoud did not elaborate on his decision not to
participate in Monday’s summit in Algeria, but it came as Syria
withdraws troops from Lebanon after facing heavy pressure from the
United States and fellow Arab countries to end a three decade
presence.

The attack devastated an eight-story apartment building in the largely
Christian New Jdeideh neighborhood shortly after midnight on Saturday
and sent panicked residents in their pajamas into the street.

Lahoud, a close Syrian ally, made no mention of the attack, saying
only in a statement that Lebanon was experiencing “exceptional
circumstances” that required “immediate and direct dialogue”
between opposition and pro-government groups.

He also offered to host immediate talks between Lebanon’s various
political factions amid negotiations over the formation of a new
government.

Opposition legislator Fares Soeid dismissed the invite, saying: “It’s
too late. This subject is closed.”

The violence raised concerns among some Lebanese that pro-Damascus
elements might resort to violence to show, in their view, the need for
a continued presence by Syrian forces. Hundreds of thousands of
Lebanese have demonstrated for and against Syria since the Feb. 14
slaying of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. The anti-Syrian
protests have featured large numbers of Maronite Christians.

Police closed all entrances leading to the blast site and blocked
onlookers from nearing the devastated building. After sunrise,
residents began clearing debris and inspecting their damaged shops and
homes.

The Lebanese military also announced stricter measures against any
security violators. “The army will not allow that freedom of
expression be abused in order to harm security and stability,” it
said in a statement.

Security officials said on condition of anonymity the blast was caused
by a time-bomb underneath a car belonging to a Lebanese-Armenian
resident of the damaged building. The whereabouts of the car owner
were not known.

Earlier, witnesses said the car attempted to stop in front of a bingo
hall, but security guards asked its driver to move along. The driver
then parked the car a short way down the road. Minutes later it
exploded.

Opposition leader Walid Jumblatt warned there could be more car bombs
and assassination attempts but urged calm.

“Car bomb messages do not threaten our national unity,” Jumblatt
said in a speech to supporters at his mountain palace of Mukhtara,
southeast of Beirut.

The leader of the militant group Hezbollah, which is backed by Syria
and Iran, warned the opposition against closing the door to
dialogue. That “could take the country to an unsafe place and create
an atmosphere that the enemies of Lebanon might use, as happened last
night,” Hassan Nasrallah said Saturday.

Political demands from factions for and against Syria have bogged down
efforts to form a new government, raising concerns that the deadlock
could threaten upcoming elections and even Syria’s final withdrawal.

Pro-Damascus premier-designate Omar Karami, whose previous government
was forced to resign as anti-Syrian sentiment increased, has insisted
on a “national unity” government. But the opposition is refusing to
join unless its demands are met. The opposition wants a neutral
Cabinet to arrange for elections, the resignation of security chiefs
and an international investigation into the blast that killed Hariri
and 17 other people.

Many have linked the Lebanese and Syrian governments to the killing;
both governments deny any involvement.

Some opposition members accuse Karami of stalling to destroy chances
of holding an election they believe the pro-Syrian camp will lose.

Jumblatt told Future Television that parliamentary polls should be
held as planned for April and May. “Let them hold the elections
according to the electoral law they deem suitable, but we will not
participate in the government,” he said.

Saturday’s explosion blew off the fronts of some structures, left a
seven-foot-deep crater, damaged parked cars and shops and shattered
windows for several blocks.

Christian opposition member Pierre Gemayel linked the attack to the
Syrian troop pullout.

“This has been the message to the Lebanese people for a while – to
sow fear and terror among Lebanese citizens,” he told Al-Jazeera
satellite television. The message is “if there is a Syrian
withdrawal from Lebanon, look what Lebanon will face.”

The intensity of the political battle over Syria’s troops has raised
fears of a return to the sectarian violence of Lebanon’s 1975-90 civil
war. So far, however, the political camps do not conform to religious
boundaries, with Christians and Muslims on both sides of the debate.

On Thursday, Syria completed the first phase of its withdrawal in
Lebanon, redeploying all its remaining soldiers and military
intelligence officers to the eastern Bekaa Valley. Of the 14,000
troops that were in Lebanon last month, at least 4,000 soldiers have
returned to Syria.

At the United Nations, Maronite Cardinal Nasrallah Sfeir said that
Syria had given assurances it would withdraw its troops before the
country’s elections, as U.N. and American officials want.

BAKU: Azerbaijan. Amb presents creds to the Grand Duke of Luxembourg

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
March 18 2005

AMBASSADOR OF AZERBAIJAN PRESENTS CREDENTIALS TO THE GRAND DUKE OF
LUXEMBOURG
[March 18, 2005, 19:53:01]

Ambassador of the Azerbaijan Republic in the Benelux countries Arif
Mammadov, after Belgium and the Netherlands, has made visit to
Luxembourg to present to the Grand Duke of this country his
credentials.

Within the framework of visit, the ambassador has carried out a
number of meetings in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Luxembourg.
During the meetings, which have been carried out with heads of
department of bilateral political relations of the ministry, legal
administration and management of bilateral economic relations,
discussed were questions of development of mutual relations between
Luxembourg and Azerbaijan, cooperation in various spheres.

On March 15, ceremony of presenting of credentials has taken place in
Duchy of Luxembourg. Upon termination of ceremony, has taken place
the meeting of Grand Duke of Luxembourg Anri with ambassador Arif
Mammadov in private. The Ambassador has in detail informed the Duke
on the reforms, carried out in Azerbaijan, the investment climate in
the country, about the negotiations held in the field of peace
settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

At the meeting, sides also have exchanged views on acceptance of
necessary measures for more intensive development of mutual
relations.

Azeri, Chinese leaders sign five cooperation accords, expect more

Azeri, Chinese leaders sign five cooperation accords, expected to sign more

MPA news agency
17 Mar 05

BAKU

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev met his Chinese counterpart Hu
Jintao today, MPA reports. The sides discussed ways of developing
relations between Azerbaijan and the People’s Republic of China.

The communique signed by the presidents of the two countries reflects
issues related to the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict and Beijing’s
support for the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway system.

During the Azerbaijani president’s visit to China, five documents were
signed on cooperation in the area of youth policy, television
broadcasting, communications and information technologies,
collaboration between the two countries’ Olympic committees and
justice ministries.

Today, the sides are expected to sign an agreement on extradition, a
memorandum on the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s technical assistance to
the Azerbaijani ministry, an agreement on trade and economic
cooperation (which envisages assistance to the tune of 1.8m dollars),
a document on economic and technical cooperation, agreements on
avoiding double taxation, cooperation in the area of customs, and
contacts in the area of culture and arts in 2005-2009.

Moscow to host int’l conference, “Islam for Peace”

RIA Novosti, Russia
March 17 2005

MOSCOW TO HOST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, “ISLAM FOR PEACE”

MOSCOW, March 17 (RIA Novosti) – An international public political
conference, “Islam for Peace”, will gather in Moscow, April 21.

The forum will be dedicated to the 60th anniversary of victory in
World War II, and will concern combat against extremism and
terrorism, Kamilzhan Kalandarov, one of the conference organizers,
said to a news conference in Moscow. He is president of the
all-Russia public organization Khak (Justice).

The conference will bring together muftis of Russia’s North Caucasian
republics, leaders of all religions and denominations established in
Russia, State Duma members, spokesmen of ministries and other federal
offices, and delegates from unrecognized republics in the post-Soviet
area-Abkhazia and Transdniestria. CIS countries will be represented,
too, in particular, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Tajikistan and
Ukraine. Guests will come from Iran, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Syria.

It took Russia’s Muslim elite and human rights organizations five
years to prepare the ground for the conference, which aims to assist
government agencies in preventing and combating extremism, terrorism
and xenophobia, and to promote peace and stability in Russia, Mr.
Kalandarov said with emphasis.

Khak projects enjoy support from the United Council of Russian Muslim
Boards against Extremism and Terrorism. The council comprises the
Central Muslim Board, led by Sheikh Talgat Tajuddin; the Muslim Board
for European Russia and the Russian Muftiyyate, both led by Sheikh
Ravil Gainutdin; the Coordination Center for North Caucasian Muslims;
and the International Islamic Mission.

Primate to ordain new priest April 2-3

PRESS OFFICE
Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern)
630 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Contact: Jake Goshert, Coordinator of Information Services
Tel: (212) 686-0710 Ext. 60; Fax: (212) 779-3558
E-mail: [email protected]
Website:

March 15, 2005
___________________

ST. VARTAN CATHEDRAL TO HOST PRIESTLY ORDINATION

During a two-day celebration, April 2 and 3, 2005, Archbishop Khajag
Barsamian, Primate of the Diocese of the Armenian Church of America
(Eastern), will ordain into the priesthood Dn. Ara Kadehjian at New York
City’s St. Vartan Cathedral.

The weekend ordination will begin with the “Service of Calling” at 5
p.m. on Saturday, April 2, and conclude with the ordination service
during the Divine Liturgy at 10:30 a.m. on Sunday, April 3. Fr.
Mardiros Chevian, dean of the cathedral, will serve as the sponsoring
priest. Charles Pinajian of the St. Leon Church of Fair Lawn, NJ, will
serve as the godfather for the ordination.

“Dn. Kadehjian and his young family are truly dedicated to the Armenian
Church,” the Primate said. “It is encouraging to see such a devoted,
young person making the church his life-long focus.”

The public is invited to attend the ordination. A banquet will follow.
Requires reservations.

FULL CIRCLE

His upcoming ordination in St. Vartan Cathedral will bring Dn. Ara
Papken Kadehjian full circle. The son of Papken and Shakeh Kadehjian
and the brother of Lisa Kadehjian of Queens, NY, Dn. Ara — who was born
in Englewood, NJ, and grew up in Queens — was baptized and served on
the cathedral’s altar, where he also attended the St. Gregory the
Illuminator Sunday School and Armenian Language School.

It was while he was serving on the cathedral altar that Dn. Ara received
the four orders of an acolyte and the rank of stole bearer by Archbishop
Barsamian. During the summer of 1992 Dn. Ara participated in the St.
Nersess Armenian Seminary’s Mission to Armenia, which led him the next
year to enroll as a pre-seminary student at Concordia College in
Bronxville, NY, from which he graduated with a bachelor’s degree in
history in 1997.

In 1998, he was ordained as a sub-deacon by Archbishop Barsamian. In
May of 2000 Dn. Ara received his master’s degree in theological studies
from St. Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological Seminary in conjunction with
St. Nersess Seminary. In May 2004, he earned a master of divinity
degree through the join program with St. Vladimir’s and St. Nersess.

After spending the summer of 2000 at the Armenian Patriarchate in
Jerusalem, Dn. Ara was ordained as a deacon by Archbishop Barsamian on
October 1, 2000, at the St. Mary Church of Washington, D.C.

SERVICE TO COMMUNITIES

Dn. Ara has a wide background of experience serving the church. From
October 2000 to October 2002, he served as the assistant to the pastor
of the Church of the Holy Ascension in Trumbull, CT. From October 2002
to May 2004, he served as the assistant to the pastor of St. Leon Church
of Fairlawn, NJ, where he met and married his wife, Tina Bogoshian, on
May 23, 2004.

On February 11, 2005, the couple became parents with the birth of their
daughter, Arev Aznive Kadehjian.

>From May to August 2004, Dn. Ara served as the assistant to the
executive director of the Diocese of the Armenian Church (Eastern), and
since September 2004 he has been working as the interim coordinator of
the Diocese’s Mission Parish Program.

Dn. Ara has also completed an 11-week hospital internship at NYU-Mount
Sinai Hospital and received a Clinical Pastoral Education Certificate.
In his younger years he also served the community of Bayside, Queens, as
a volunteer patrolman in the 111th Precinct Auxiliary Police.

— 3/15/05

E-mail photos available on request. Photos also viewable in the News
and Events section of the Eastern Diocese’s website,

PHOTO CAPTION (1): Dn. Ara Kadehjian will be ordained into the
priesthood by Archbishop Khajag Barsamian, Primate of the Eastern
Diocese, on April 2 and 3, 2005, at New York City’s St. Vartan
Cathedral.

www.armenianchurch.org
www.armenianchurch.org.

NKR Deputy FM Masis Mailyan Calls For Widening Of Buffer Zone

Deputy foreign minister of the Nagornyy Karabakh Republic Masis Mailyan,calls
for widening of Karabakh “buffer zone”

Arminfo, Yerevan
12 Mar 05

STEPANAKERT

The cease-fire violations this week cannot be assessed as a tendency,
but it cannot be ruled out that such incidents will be repeated in the
future, the deputy foreign minister of the Nagornyy Karabakh Republic,
Masis Mailyan, has told Kavkazskiy Uzel [web site].

The Azerbaijani side has been purposefully bringing its firing
positions closer to the contact line with the Nagornyy Karabakh
defence army for the past few years, thus reducing the so-called
“buffer zone”, he said.

“We have more than once warned representatives of the OSCE mediation
mission that reducing the distance between the conflicting sides could
lead to the escalation of tension on the front line, and this is what
we have today,” the deputy minister said. He also said that in order
to avoid fresh incidents, the border should be demarcated
internationally and Azerbaijani troops should be moved back to their
previous positions.

The Nagornyy Karabakh authorities welcome the suggestion of the
personal representative of the OSCE chairman-in-office that monitoring
be conducted in the near future of the section of the contact line
where the Azerbaijani side has been regularly violating the cease-fire
since 7 March, Mailyan said.

[Passage omitted: minor details]

Armenia to Build Gas Pipeline to Iran

Moscow Times, Russia
March 15 2005

Armenia to Build Gas Pipeline to Iran

Bloomberg
LONDON — Gazprom’s Armenian venture plans to start within a month
building a natural gas pipeline from Iran to import the fuel to
Armenia, Vremya Novostei reported, citing Karen Karapetyan, the head
of the Armenian unit.

Armrosgazprom, a venture between Armenia’s government and Gazprom,
doesn’t plan to extend the pipeline beyond Armenia into Azerbaijan,
the newspaper reported.

The link is scheduled to be finished by 2007 and will initially pump
1.1 billion cubic meters of gas per year to Armenia. Shipments will
rise to 2.3 bcm per year from 2019 under a 20-year contract.

The project will need between $200 million and $250 million of
investment, the paper said. Armenia will pay for part of the gas
supplies by exporting electricity to Iran, the paper said.

Iran holds the world’s second-largest natural gas reserves.

BAKU: Separatist leader says mutual mistrust hinders NK settlement

Separatist leader says mutual mistrust hinders Karabakh settlement

Ekho, Baku
12 Mar 05

The leader of Azerbaijan’s breakaway Nagornyy Karabakh region has said
that mutual mistrust is the main obstacle to a peaceful settlement to
the long-standing conflict. “We do not trust each other and expect
tricks. It is impossible to reach an agreement with an enemy, only
with an opponent,” Arkadiy Gukasyan said in an interview with
Baku-based Ekho newspaper. He said that Karabakh did not want a new
war, but should Azerbaijan choose a military solution to the problem,
the separatists are ready to parry the blow. Gukasyan once again
denied pursuing a state policy of settlement of an ethnic Armenian
population on the occupied territories. But he said as long as
refugees from other parts of Azerbaijan settled in Nagornyy Karabakh,
his government had to create normal living conditions for them and
build infrastructure. Gukasyan also denied plans to run for the third
term in office and said he might leave politics altogether soon. The
following is an excerpt from the interview by Eynulla Fatullayev as
published by Azerbaijani newspaper Ekho on 12 March and headlined
“Arkadiy Gukasyan: One can make a concession to a potential friend,
colleague, opponent, but not an enemy” and subheaded “In Karabakh,
they do not rule out the possibility that Lacin issue might become a
subject of negotiations”; subheadings have been inserted editorially:

There are always at least two parties to any conflict. The Azerbaijani
public has thus far been familiar with only one position – its
own. Why can we not listen to the other side? This is why we suggest
that our readers familiarize themselves with the position of Arkadiy
Gukasyan, leader of the Nagornyy Karabakh separatists.

OSCE monitoring mission

[Fatullayev] During my current visit to Nagornyy Karabakh, I have
gathered numerous facts of settlement on occupied territories. A
technical mission of the OSCE Minsk Group has recently carried out
monitoring of the facts of settlement. What is your assessment of the
results of the activity of the Minsk Group experts?

[Gukasyan] We have applied many times to different international
instances with the request to send a monitoring mission to Nagornyy
Karabakh. This issue has been actively discussed in Azerbaijan. On an
initiative by the Azerbaijani side, they have conducted careful
monitoring in Nagornyy Karabakh itself and around it. I hope that the
report and analysis of the situation will be objective. If the report
by the monitoring group reflects what they actually saw, I think that
they will be able to supply answers to many questions, including
those, in particular, that worry Azerbaijan.

I can say unequivocally that we do not implement a state policy of
settlement in the territories that we control. Azerbaijan claims that
the settlement policy is implemented by Yerevan. In this case,
Armenia’s involvement is out of the question. There are great many
refugees from different districts and towns of Azerbaijan, who
unfortunately have found themselves to be absolutely forgotten. It so
happened that people talk about Azerbaijani refugees all the time. It
is no secret that Azerbaijani propaganda has always been more active
in this regard. But it looks as if everyone has forgotten that
Armenian refugees, who lived in Baku, Sumqayit, Kirovabad [Ganca],
also exist. It seems to me that the monitoring group should include
this factor in its report too.

The refugee issue is one of the most painful issues of the settlement
of the Karabakh conflict. International standards have to be taken
into account here. No-one has the right to deny a person the right to
return to where he or she lived. But I do not think that this is the
issue from which we should start the process of conflict
settlement. Neither would it be reasonable to view the issue of
refugees, Armenian or Azerbaijani, out of context, as they most
probably have to be discussed in the same context.

The vast majority of the people who settled in the areas under our
control are refugees who have no other possibility to make their
living. Of course, we are creating infrastructure in these areas. If
children live there, they have to go to school. It is incumbent on us
to establish law and order there, so we create the local
administration, police, prosecutor’s office there. We do not stimulate
the settlement process, but as long as people already live there, we
must ensure normal living conditions there.

I made a request to both the monitoring group and the co-chairmen [of
the OSCE Minsk Group] to carry out monitoring of the territory to
determine the areas where nuclear waste is buried and drugs
trafficking takes place, which Azerbaijani politicians often talk
about. We are ready to receive any monitoring group in any area.

I think that the impartial monitoring of the situation, which the OSCE
will carry out, will defuse tension in Azerbaijan itself, where many
people perhaps sincerely believe that Karabakh is the area where the
policy of settlement in the [occupied] areas is implemented, nuclear
waste is buried, and drugs business flourishes.

Lacin corridor – matter of life and death

[Fatullayev] The initial results of the monitoring are already
available. The French co-chairman of the Minsk Group [Bernard Fassier]
has confirmed the facts of settlement in Lacin District, in
particular, by citizens of Armenia and other foreign countries.

[Gukasyan] I do not think that he meant Lacin District. Apparently,
talk is about the town of Lacin. We do not hide the fact that we are
building infrastructure there. A small number of Armenian citizens
reside there. It is in our interest that Lacin is inhabited, and our
reasoning on this issue is based on the premise that no matter how the
Karabakh problem is resolved, Lacin and the Lacin corridor, which
connects us with Armenia, must remain under Nagornyy Karabakh’s
control. The issue cannot be raised in any other way as far as we are
concerned. I understand that I might hurt the feelings of the
Azerbaijanis by saying this. But I also want to remind you that
Shaumyan District (Asagi Agcakand – editor’s note), Getashen (Cayli –
editor’s note), and villages of Nagornyy Karabakh are under occupation
at present. In other words, we do have subject for discussion. But I
think that handing back Lacin, or at least that section of the
district which links Nagornyy Karabakh with Armenia, is out of the
question.

[Fatullayev] But how about Kalbacar? For instance, Dashnaks from
Karabakh deem that district as important as Lacin.

[Gukasyan] I think that this is how not only Dashnaks, but any
Armenian whom you will talk to is going to discuss this issue. They
will build their reasoning on the premise that Kalbacar is the
district which has a serious influence on the security of Nagornyy
Karabakh. If we trace back the chronology of combat operations (in
particular, the tactic of advancement of the Azerbaijani troops), the
Kalbacar bridgehead has played the decisive role in the destiny of
both Shaumyanovsk [as published; Shaumyan] (Asagi Agcakand – editor’s
note) and Mardakert (Agdara – editor’s note). I would rather not
answer this question now.

It has to be understood that the extent of our concessions depends on
the extent of concessions by Azerbaijan. If Azerbaijan has no
intention to discuss the Shaumyan or Getashen issue at all, should we
discuss the issue of Kalbacar or, say, Agdam? If we talk about
occupied territories, we should discuss our occupied territories too.

[Fatullayev] But the districts in question have never been part of the
Nagornyy Karabakh Autonomous Region.

[Gukasyan] Shaumyan was not part of it until 1991, when independence
of the “NKR” [quotation marks as published] was declared. We declared
that the republic included the territories of the Nagornyy Karabakh
Autonomous Region and Shaumyan [District]. Even if we assume that
Shaumyan was not part of the Nagornyy Karabakh Autonomous Region, that
district was the area with a predominantly ethnic Armenian population.

[Fatullayev] Has this issue been discussed within the framework of the
Armenian-Azerbaijani settlement?

[Gukasyan] We have always been raising this issue within the framework
of the Minks process. I understand that these are difficult
issues. But recognition of the problem is the first step towards the
Karabakh settlement. Especially that the issue involves not only
Shaumyan District, but also parts of Mardakert and Martuni (Xocavand –
editor’s note) districts, which are currently under Azerbaijan’s
control. This is why it makes no sense to discuss in an interview what
territories we intend to hand back. In general, talking about all
these issues would be wrong and not too appropriate. These sorts of
issues should be discussed at the negotiating table. As for the extent
of our flexibility during the talks, it depends on the position of the
Azerbaijani side.

Everyone in Nagornyy Karabakh admits that the issue of Lacin and
Kalbacar is a particular one. But we have expressed our readiness on
more than one occasion to discuss all the issues that worry the
Azerbaijani side. We never speak the language of ultimatums. But when
it comes to Lacin, to the ground link between Karabakh and Armenia,
there can be no concessions here. I do not want to reminisce about
history, but I do want to say that our position is based on bitter
lessons from the past, when we found ourselves in the situation of a
humanitarian disaster because we were cut off from the rest of the
world. The Azerbaijani side would not let humanitarian cargo pass
through the Lacin road. This is why the Lacin problem is the matter of
life and death to us. However, I cannot rule out the possibility that
the Lacin issue too can become a subject for negotiations.

Mutual mistrust hinders settlement

[Fatullayev] In 1997 and 1999, the sides were said to be literally one
step away from signing a major political treaty. What, in your
opinion, hindered the implementation of the peace plan?

[Gukasyan] I do not think that the sides were one step away from a
settlement. Simply these were the critical periods when the positions
of the sides coincided on particular issues. At least there were
issues that were discussed, rather than spurned, by the sides. A
constructive dialogue was under way. I cannot describe the ongoing
negotiating process as constructive. Back then, we were closest to a
final settlement. But there is a very long way to go before we can
reach it. The main factor that hinders this process is mutual
mistrust. We do not trust each other and expect tricks. It is
impossible to reach an agreement with an enemy, only with an
opponent. Unfortunately, we are displeased with the current state of
our relations. The information war is under way and hatred for the
opposite side is cultivated. We do not hear and do not listen to each
other. Under these conditions, it is very difficult to talk about
settlement.

A settlement is a risk. It is clear that you cannot get everything,
but only part of what you want, but at the same time you are supposed
to give up on that part. This applies to all the sides. Then a
question arises: Whom should you hand back the territories? To the
enemy which might attack you tomorrow? Where is the guarantee that
this will not happen? One can make a concession to a potential friend,
colleague, opponent, but not enemy.

The nightmares of war should have been forgotten, wounds should have
healed, and we should have learned to make concessions to each other
over these years. Unfortunately, this has not happened. It is getting
only worse. Look at the tone in your, our and Armenian mass
media. Until we learn to respect each other and create the atmosphere
of mutual trust, a settlement is out of the question altogether.

No subjugation to Azerbaijan

[Fatullayev] Are there any fundamental differences between the
approaches of the leaders of Armenia and Nagornyy Karabakh to the
settlement of the Karabakh conflict?

[Gukasyan] Even if there were some differences, it is clear that this
cannot be a subject of our interview. I cannot tell you about
them. There are different approaches, although there are no
differences on the most important matters. The main thesis that is
supported by all the forces is that Nagornyy Karabakh cannot be
subjugated to Azerbaijan. There are no differences on this issue.
Second, Nagornyy Karabakh should have a ground link with Armenia. Then
the military-political security of Nagornyy Karabakh should be
ensured. There are tactical differences on what has to be done, on
some particular issues, which it does not make sense to discuss
now. There are no differences that might lead to a conflict with
Armenia, though. In the recent past, there were such differences, but
not between Armenia and Nagornyy Karabakh, but between the Armenian
authorities and Armenian people.

[Fatullayev] You have said that you reject the possibility of
subjugation to Azerbaijan. Do you consider the model which is based on
coexistence within the same state and horizontal relations? During
some periods, this model was a subject for discussion between the
sides.

[Gukasyan] We have discussed this many times. I have already said,
though, that we refuse to hear each other. Azerbaijan says: Let us
restore the 1988 status quo, pretend that nothing happened, there was
no war, casualties and so on; give us back the territories, recognize
that Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan and that you are Azerbaijani
citizens… [ellipses as given] In other words, surrender! Azerbaijan
openly says that we should capitulate, or else it will exterminate us,
it will start a war and get back not only the occupied territories,
but Nagornyy Karabakh itself, Stepanakert [Xankandi] and other
Armenian [as published] districts. This is all we hear from
Azerbaijan. To us, there is nothing to discuss in this. What should we
discuss? Autonomous status within Azerbaijan? When, on the other hand,
we talk about Karabakh’s independence, I understand that there is
nothing to discuss in it to Azerbaijan.

This is why we have many times proposed to Azerbaijan not to mention
either of these points. Much as Azerbaijan might want to turn a blind
eye to the fact that Karabakh is a party to the conflict, it will be
ultimately forced to admit this. We are ready to discuss problems with
Azerbaijan. With or without Armenia – this does not matter at all to
us. We are ready to join the Minsk process. We propose a dialogue to
Azerbaijan in which terms that irritate either side would be avoided.

“We do not want a new war”

But as soon as we say that our independence should be recognized and
then negotiations should be held, the dialogue becomes
meaningless. Our side does the same when Azerbaijan addresses us as
the Nagornyy Karabakh Autonomous Region. We are willing to recognize
Azerbaijan’s participation in the determination of the status of
Nagornyy Karabakh. But we think that it would be impossible to do this
in the current terrible atmosphere. To begin with, we propose to
Azerbaijan to begin discussions on relations between Azerbaijan and
Nagornyy Karabakh. What we will agree on will become the status of
Nagornyy Karabakh. But unfortunately, no-one talks to us.

[Fatullayev] As a result, representatives of the Azerbaijani
leadership have started of late to lean towards a military, strong-arm
option of settlement in their statements.

[Gukasyan] Unfortunately, people who have no idea about the horrors of
war talk about war. We have first-hand experience of all the hardships
of hostilities. We do not want a new war, but if Azerbaijan chooses
this “way of settlement”, we are ready to parry the blow. This is
precisely what I told OSCE representatives. Azerbaijan does not
realize that we have moved the conflict to the enemy’s territory. Our
cannons are aimed at the civilian population of Barda, Tartar,
Goranboy, Ganca, whereas Azerbaijani shells will not reach even
Askaran. Can you imagine what price Azerbaijan will have to pay in
this war? How many victims will there be? This is not a threat, this
is a statement of the actual state of affairs, to which these people
do not even give a thought.

International attitude

[Fatullayev] But you should understand that the position of the
international community on the separatist regimes in the CIS has
become firmer. Nagornyy Karabakh is no exception in this case. The
resolution by [Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
rapporteur on Nagornyy Karabakh David] Atkinson and statement by
Elizabeth Jones [US assistant secretary of state for European and
Eurasian affairs] show the Western attitude towards the Karabakh
settlement. Do you really believe that unrecognized states can come
into being?

[Gukasyan] It is difficult to draw conclusions. I would not talk about
an unambiguous toughening of their position. Jones included Karabakh
in the list of separatist states one day and excluded it from the list
on the next day. There is no universal model for resolving all
conflict situations. Many Western officials have on numerous occasions
highlighted the Karabakh problem, viewing it separately from other
conflicts. They think that democracy, civil society, diverse economy
are developing here, social problems are being resolved. And this has
been emphasized in the international press.

Of course, there are established standards in the world. The West is
afraid to destroy them. We understand that this is a difficult process
and nurture no illusions. The world is looking for a political
solution. I do not want to generalize, but there is no unconditional
rejection of the processes that unfold in Nagornyy Karabakh.

Political rivalry

[Fatullayev] Now you are making preparations for adopting a new
constitution. Your opponents, the oppositionists, do not hide their
suspicions that this is linked with your attempt to run for the third
presidential term.

[Gukasyan] I am glad that there are several points of view and free
political rivalry in Nagornyy Karabakh. My actions are based on what
is more important to us at present – fears that Gukasyan might run for
the third time or the constitution. I have always supported the idea
of adopting the constitution.

[Fatullayev] Why was it not adopted earlier?

[Gukasyan] I did not want to complicate the negotiating process and be
accused of having an non-constructive position. Incidentally, although
I was a supporter of the constitution, the idea of its adoption
emanated from the opposition in recent years. The oppositionists who
told you about their fears insisted on their demands for the
constitution and pressed the authorities. They accused me of delaying
this process. It is strange and incomprehensible to me. If the
opposition thinks that we do not need the constitution, I am ready to
postpone this process for some time. As for my third term, it is up to
the people to decide. In addition, I have not announced my intention
to run for the third time yet. I doubt that I should. I think that 10
years is enough. The people want novelty because their expectations
are attached to something new. I am not going to go against the will
of the people – the presidential office is not an end in itself to me.

[Fatullayev] Is this connected with your intention to take part in the
Armenian political life? You are named among the likely successors to
Robert Kocharyan in the Armenian press.

[Gukasyan] This is yet another absurdity. I do not even think about
becoming Kocharyan’s successor. I do not think about my future
political career because it has already been too long. Perhaps people
are tired of me, and I am tired myself. I cannot rule out the
possibility that I will soon retire from politics.

[Fatullayev] One of your former rivals, Samvel Babayan, is perhaps
preparing for resuscitation of his political activity. He has founded
his own analytical centre in Yerevan recently. Many analysts deem his
joining forces with the opposition likely. What is your view of
intensification of his efforts in Karabakh?

[Gukasyan] I do not think that he is preparing for resuscitation. I
have no such information.

[Fatullayev] Analysts say that Babayan is not the kind of person who
will easily restrain his ambitions.

[Gukasyan] Every person has the right to have ambitions and to fulfil
them.

[Fatullayev] Is it true that you granted him amnesty on the condition
that he will not get involved in politics in Nagornyy Karabakh for
three years?

[Gukasyan] Such an agreement has not taken place. He is free in his
actions.

[Fatullayev] In contrast to Armenia, Dashnaks in Nagornyy Karabakh
have irreconcilable position towards the authorities. Why is this?

[Gukasyan] There are things that are difficult to explain. Talk is not
about the Dashnaktsutyun party, but about the local officials of this
party. I think that their latest steps were simply unserious. This
does not become a party. Dashnaks from Karabakh go from one extreme
to the other. I cannot rule out the possibility that their position
will change again.

Foreign investment

[Fatullayev] The opposition accuses the authorities of rampant
corruption. Newspapers in Karabakh often publish articles about abuse
of power by officials who build manors for themselves and are steeped
in criminal business dealings. How serious is the corruption problem
in Karabakh?

[Gukasyan] Compared to Azerbaijan and Armenia, there is no corruption
in Karabakh. The destructive opposition is playing on people’s
heartstrings and inciting them to rise against the authorities. Do you
talk about manors? I think that you know what sort of houses are built
in Baku, Moscow and other cities in the post-Soviet area. We are not
number one in this respect. I do not deny that there is bribery, but
it is not systemic. The opposition is wrong in this issue.

[Passage omitted]

[Fatullayev] There is talk in Karabakh about friction between you and
[Prime Minister Anushavan] Daniyelyan. Is it true that relations
between you became particularly acute when, during the period of your
recovery from the terrorist attack, he started to become politically
active and prepare for assuming power himself?

[Gukasyan] I do not know who told you this and why they say this. The
prime minister cannot become the president of Nagornyy Karabakh no
matter what. He cannot lay claims to supreme power.

[Fatullayev] There is a lot of talk in Karabakh about foreign
investments into the economy. Can you name the major investors?

[Gukasyan] So that Azerbaijan can start a new wave of pressure on
those companies? Many US, French, Russian, Australian, Swiss and
German companies invest in Karabakh. But I will not name
them. Sometimes I get an impression anyway that your Foreign Ministry
has nothing else to do but to trace in Armenian newspapers the names
of the companies that cooperate with us and then flood their home
countries with protest notes.

[Fatullayev] Do Turkish businesses show their interest?

[Gukasyan] No, although we are ready for cooperation.

[Fatullayev] And what is the position of ethnic Azeri Iranian
citizens?

[Gukasyan] They do not come. There are ethnic Armenians from Iran,
though, who run small and medium-sized businesses.

[Fatullayev] How is regional development proceeding? What is the
dynamic of development, say, in Xocavand, Hadrut, Agdara districts?

[Gukasyan] But Xocavand – what is this?

[Fatullayev] It is Martuni [Armenian name of the town].

[Gukasyan] Do you not find it strange that in Soviet times, our
[capital] city was called Stepanakert, whereas now Baku calls it
Xankandi. This alone betrays the attitude towards us. Would you like
if we called Baku some other name? How is it possible to talk about a
peaceful settlement on the one hand and use these kinds of methods to
irritate us on the other?

ARMENIANOW.COM March 11, 2005

ARMENIANOW.COM March 11, 2005

Administration Address: 26 Parpetsi St., No 9
Phone: +(374 1) 532422
Email: [email protected]
Internet:
Technical Assistance: (For technical assistance please contact to Babken Juharyan)
Email: [email protected]
ICQ#: 97152052

CHURCH QUARREL: ARMENIAN CHURCH IN TBILISI UNDER THREAT

By Julia Hakobyan, ArmeniaNow Reporter

An Armenian church in Georgia has again became a subject of debate
following a long term dispute between Armenian and Georgian Dioceses.

This time the debate was raised around Norashen church, where several
months ago tombs from Georgian cemeteries with Georgian inscriptions
appeared.

Norashen, a 15th century construction in the Georgian capital Tbilisi
is located next to Georgian Orthodox Church Jvris monastery. Father
Tariel, the priest of monastery, who brought the Georgian tombs
into the Armenian church, said in an interview to Georgian Mzera TV
Company that ~Sall the churches on the territory of Georgia belong
to Georgian Orthodox, with the exception of some, built also by
Georgians~T. Referring to Norashen the Georgian priest said that
~Schurch was taken away from Georgians by Russians, privatized and
then sold to Armenians~T. Father Tariel assured if digging at the
church, he would discover new Georgian tombs.

Last week Armenian diocese of Georgia and several non Armenian
organizations issued statements protesting against assimilation of
Norashen and ~Sobvious attempt of falsification of the historical
facts.~T Aggressive actions of Georgian ecclesiastic are ~Sblasphemy
towards the deceased, from whose graves the tombs were taken~T,
said father Abgar, the representative of Armenian Eparchy in Georgia.

~SIn fact father Tariel does not deny that the Norashen church
is Armenian but in his interview to Georgian Rustavi 2 channel he
suggested Armenians ‘go to your country Armenia and take care of your
churches there’,~T father Abgar told ArmeniaNow.

~SToday we have to defend not only Norashen but also Surb Nshan and
four other closed half destroyed Armenian churches in Tbilisi. These
churches are obviously Armenian and we will not allow appropriating
them.~T

On March 3 Georgian and Armenian youth organizations organized
a peaceful procession in Tbilisi aiming to raise attention to
Norashen~Rs problems. The participants of the action called both
Dioceses to enter into negotiation for solving the existing problem.

~SThe closed Armenian churches on the Georgian territory officially
are accepted as architecture monuments and ~Qguarded~R by the state
and being on the culture ministry~Rs balance at present,~T says Karen
Elchyan, the head of Armenian Cooperation Centre of Georgia based in
Tbilisi. (ACCG) ~SBut only in Tbilisi, six Armenian churches from
the list of so called ~Qprotected~R architectural monuments were
transformed into Georgian Church.~T

The ACCG as well as other Armenian organizations are going to continue
their efforts to prevent from destruction the historical monuments
in Georgia.

The attempts to convert Armenian Church Norashen into Georgian started
in 1994 when the altar of the church, frescos, and khachkars were
ruined in order to eliminate the fact proving the Armenian origin of
the building. The protest of the Armenian community was not effective
and following the destruction the door with Armenian epigraphy was
changed also.

However the culmination of the church~Rs appropriation happened in
1995 when Norashen was consecrated as Georgian Orthodox.

Such encroachment rose concern in Echmiadzin and an Armenian clergy
arrived to Georgia to meet Georgian Patriarchy ~V Ilia II. But
the problem wasn~Rt solved and sides agreed to delay the question
temporarily ~Suntil favorable conditions~T. The reconstruction works
initiated by Georgian Diocese were stopped and church status remained
unresolved.

The issue of Armenian churches in Georgia is painful for the Armenian
community in Georgia. According to official data some 250,000 Armenians
live in Georgia however neither community not Armenian Diocese can
prevent the further destruction of its churches.

In the beginning of the 20 century there were 30 Armenian churches
in Tbilisi. Now only two churches are acting while others have been
either destroyed or redecorated to remove any characteristically
Armenian architectural features. Now they belong to Georgian Orthodox
and other confessions. Georgian authorities strictly deny the facts
of churches appropriation.

Samvel Karapetyan, a coordinator of the ~SResearch of Armenian
Architecture~T, ngo in Yerevan is very skeptical towards the
attempts of the Armenian community of Georgia to protect cultural
and historical monuments. Karapetyan, who published several books on
Armenian monuments in Georgia calls the current efforts ~Sretarded~T
and ~Sartificial~T ~SThey had to unite and think what to do before
the church was consecrated into Georgian,~T he said.

Karapetyan published a book in 1995 where he described day by day what
was stole, destroyed, and vandalized in Norashen church. However he
says his book got no attention nor response from Armenian authorities.

~SNorashen is just a sample, a result of our own politics towards our
culture. I accuse Georgians in what they do, but moreover I accuse
the Armenian government which allows Georgians to do it.~T

AT WAR: ARMENIAN TROOPS ON THE GROUND IN IRAQ

By Aris Ghazinyan, ArmeniaNow Reporter

The Armenian military contingent dispatched to Iraq began service
within a Polish battalion on March 1, Press Secretary of the RA
Ministry of Defense Colonel Seyran Shahsuvaryan told ArmeniaNow.

Forty-six ~Snon-combatant~T Armenians went to Kuwait for special
training in mid-January.

~SAfter passing a course of adaptation to the new conditions as well
as a short preparatory course, the Armenian contingent accompanied by
a Polish battalion crossed the southern border of Iraq and on March
1 began implementing their direct duties,~T Shahsuvaryan said.

That representatives of the armed forces of Armenia, unlike Georgian
and Azeri servicemen in Iraq, will not participate in military
operations.

~SArmenia is not going to send to Iraq a strictly military contingent,
which should be involved in military operations,~T said Foreign
Minister Vardan Oskanian last September. ~SThe matter concerns only
humanitarian assistance to this country and Armenia~Rs participation
in the post-war rehabilitation of Iraq.~T

The Armenian deployment includes one general commander, one liaison
officer attached to the Polish division~Rs staff, one platoon
commander, three doctors ~V a cardiologist, a physical therapist and
a psychiatrist, 10 sappers and 30 drivers.

~SIt was originally planned that Armenian drivers would operate
military vehicles at the disposal of Armenia~Rs Ministry of Defense,
however we had to abandon this intention, as the fact of their being
unfit for specifically desert areas with sand surface and conditions
of sharp daily fluctuations in temperature became apparent,~T said
Shahsuvaryan. ~SIn particular, our vehicles are largely meant for
passing sections typical for Armenia, and they lack parts essential
for desert areas.~T

The decision about sending Armenian peacekeepers to Iraq was made by
the Ministry of Defense on April 26, 2004. On June 9, the Government
supported this decision and endorsed the proposal. President Robert
Kocharyan ratified the proposal last August 9.

Various politicians and groups have opposed sending Armenians to the
war in Iraq, stating that to do so would jeopardize relations for
the community of Armenians in Iraq, some 25,000.

But on December 24, with a vote of 91-23 and one abstention, the
National Assembly gave its approval. Most deputies who opposed sending
troops worried over how Armenia~Rs participation would affect relations
with Russia, who has opposed the war.

National Assembly Vice-Speaker, ARF Dashnaktsutyun faction member
Vahan Hovhannisyan said in this connection: ~SArmenia is entitled to
make decisions proceeding from its interests in the matter of sending
an Armenian contingent to Iraq. Russia itself rendered much assistance
to this country writing off the bulk of Iraq~Rs state debt.~T

The prospect of national communities in Arab countries and problems
of security of the contingent itself aroused much more concerns in
Armenian society. In an editorial, ~SAzg~T daily, raised a question:
~SWho will assume the responsibility if one day we see a prisoner
from among our compatriots pleading for indulgency on one of the
Arabic TV channels?~T The fact that representatives of the Armenian
contingent are not immediately involved in military operations, in
the opinion of not only political analysts, but also many citizens
of Armenia cannot serve as a guarantor of peace.

~SAlmost every month we witness on television people being taken
prisoner, and the victim, as a rule, is a journalist representing
a pacifist newspaper or a member of a humanitarian mission far from
military affairs,~T says 55-year-old Rita Manaseryan from Yerevan. ~SI
watched the joyous farewell party for our guys on television on January
18 and did not understand the point of the celebrations. I think that
the fact of our children~Rs non-participation in military operations
cannot calm our authorities.~T

(Armenian also has a 34-member platoon on duty in Kosovo as part of
a Greek battalion, with a rotation of new troops expected March 12.)

Armenia~Rs financial obligation ~Sdoes not exceed $600,000~T and
includes only payment of salarires, said Armenia~Rs Defense Minister
Serge Sargsyan late last year. ~SI should mention that the Parliament
of Armenia gave its consent only for a year~Rs stay of Armenian
peacekeepers in Iraq. A rotation of the personnel will take place
after six months from the day of leaving and the personnel will be
replaced with a new one.~T

NEGOTIATIONS IN EQUATORIAL GUINEA: OSKANIAN REPORTS ON VISIT WITH
IMPRISONED PILOTS

By Zhanna Alexanyan, ArmeniaNow Reporter

After recovering from an illness upon his return from Equatorial
Guinea Februrary 20th, Minister of Foreign Affairs Vardan Oskanian
met with journalists Wednesday to report his meeting concerning the
fate of the six Armenian pilots imprisoned there.

Last November the Equatorial Guinea court found the pilots guilty
of participating in a plot to overthrow the government there, and
sentenced them to 14-24 years prison. They were arrested March 9,
2004 and were held at the Malabo ~SBlack Beach~T prison. The Armenian
pilots had left for Malabo in January and were arrested after making
their first flight.

On February 21 in Malabo the Minister met with the Prime-Minister,
the State Secretary, the Foreign Minister and the Prosecutor General
of the country. The Armenian side wished also to meet the president
of the country, but the Guinean side had made the program of meetings
without the participation of the Armenian side.

The negotiations referred to the creation of legal grounds for an
agreement between the two countries to release the pilots back to
Armenia. Oskanyan insists that high-level meetings will facilitate
an efficient resolution of the problem with the Armenian pilots.

~SIn fact contacts were established on quite a high level that
will facilitate in future the most efficient procedure regarding
the question of imprisonment and transportation of our pilots to
Armenia,~T said Oskanyan. ~SWe didn~Rt have the connection before,
now I have at least the opportunity to talk to my colleague.~T

The authorities of Equatorial Guinea have promised to seriously
discuss the issue. The Foreign Minister sees positive trends in
the resolution of the problem, although no final response has been
received. The Guinean side has expressed its readiness to discuss
the possibility of signing agreements that will allow in the nearest
future to return the Armenian pilots.

Last week the president of the Union of Armenians of Russia Ara
Abrahamyan stated in an interview with ~S168 hours~T weekly he could
help the Armenian side in returning the Armenian pilots sentenced in
Equatorial Guinea, but a special consent from the state is necessary
for that.

~SI am going to have a phone talk with Ara Abrahamyan and ask what
our opportunities are. If indeed there is an opportunity to solve
the problem through him, why not, we should use it,~T said the
Minister. ~SWe just need to coordinate to escape a parallel work and
overlapping as well as the opposite effect by all means.~T While in
Malabo, Minister Oskanyan visited the Armenian pilots.

~SThe prison conditions there are quite hard and the guys~R
psychological and moral conditions are quite hard,~T said the
Minister. ~SLooking a bit tired, they looked depressed, but I can~Rt
comment on their physical condition and in terms of health. When we
asked them, they said health is normal, but they are quite depressed.~T

APPEAL DENIED: COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF NAJARIAN IN PROPERTY DISPUTE

By Mariam Badalyan, ArmeniaNow Reporter

The Appellate Court of Armenia has denied an appeal by the General
Procuracy to stop the Procuracy~Rs investigation into whether criminal
charges should be brought in a dispute between George Najarian, a well
known Armenian-American philanthropist and a former business associate
in Yerevan, Grigor Igityan. The court proceedings may still continue
on the same matter (deciding whether it is a criminal or civil matter)
if the General Procuracy decides to further appeal the case in the
Cassation Court.

Armen Nadiryan, Senior Investigator in especially important cases
says they will decide whether to further appeal or not after they
see the court decision in written form.

In summary: After 18 months of investigation (following termination
of investigation by the Yerevan city Procuracy) the General Procuracy
concluded that the case was entirely a civil business dispute and
should be resolved in a civil court. A lower court, however, ruled
that the investigation should continue, leading to the General
Procuracy~Rs appeal.

If the appeal were successful, Najarian might still be entitled to the
disputed property, but there would be no fraud charges brought against
Igityan. Najarian claims Igityan embezzled his property (two buildings
at #4 and #11/12 Dzoragiugh District and a Photoshop at Abovyan Street
founded as a partnership between Najarian and Igityan). During his
concluding speech Najarian lawyer Ashot Poghosyan argued, among other
things, that investigators wrongfully considered a receipt to Igityan
by Najarian in connection with their photo business. According to
the lawyer, Igityan was supposed to pay back the original money,
after which the two men were to share the profit as partners. The
investigators, however, had considered it a loan made to Najarian
by Igityan.

Senior Investigator Nadiryan accused Poghosyan of disclosing
pre-investigation secrets and pointed out that the investigators
considered all facts in combination, whereas Poghosyan points to
single facts separately.

During the hearing the court heard an extract from a letter by Igityan
addressed to the President of Armenia, which said that Najarian
hired lawyers who were intimidating Igityan~Rs family and asked the
President to take relevant measures in protecting the safety of his
family. Poghosyan called the letter a ploy by Igitiyan to distract
attention from the main issue of the complaint.

OFFLINE: PREVIOUSLY ~SCLOSED~T DOMAINS NOW ~SOPEN~T

By Arpi Harutyunyan, ArmeniaNow Reporter

For 10 years many domains registered in the ~Qam~R Internet zone
have been considered untouchable. By a decision of the Internet
Union of Armenia the domains were restricted from use because,
according to Union president Igor Mkrtumyan, they carry state and
national significance.

Few, though, have known about the off-limits domains. Only those who
wanted to register one of those domains and were denied have learned
of the status.

~SThere was a time when young people called ~QInternet squatters~R
appeared in Armenia, who bought well-known domains and resold them
at higher prices. That is why we registered a number of domains and
kept it locked. In our opinion those are the domains of national
value and importance,~T says Mkrtumyan.

But since March 4 year the domains called ~Sclosed~T became officially
~Sopen~T.

Individuals and organizations can apply to the Internet Union on-line,
receive a permission, then sign an agreement with companies providing
Internet communication in Armenia and run the domains.

The national Internet community of Armenia was created in 1995. The
Internet Union was registered, which undertook the full responsibility
for allotting of domains.

The Armenia server was created and the stock of Armenian data,
previously administered in Moscow, was moved to Armenia. Since 1997
all the works connected with the internet are done in Armenia.

Until the present 3,700 domains have been registered in the ~Qam~R
zone, of which 1,200 belong to foreigners. Rights to use of the
domains are sold by the Internet Union for a fee of $24 per year.

According to Hrach Bayadayan, president of the ~SInformation
technologies Foundation~T the policy of allotting domains in Armenia
is wrong. He believes clear mechanisms for distributing domains should
be developed; for instance, permission for registering domains should
be given solely to locals and organizations connected with the sphere.

People still speculate in domains, the IT specialist says and disagrees
with the policy imposed by the Union.

~SI can~Rt see any logic in how the domains are separated,~T says
Bayadayan.~TI know many registered domains that do not yield to those
~Qclosed~R ones. I have as well registered the ~Qsociety.am~R domain
that had no less importance. And why was it decided to declare them
open now?~T

David Sandukhchyan, coordinator of the ~SGlobal Initiative for Internet
Policy~T, holds the same opinion.

~SWe had registered the media.am domain for ~QInternews~R, which was
not an accidental one. If hotel.am had special value and had to be
kept closed, then the media.am should also appear in the list. So a
question arises what principles have been chosen?~T says Sandukhchyan.

~SIt is obvious the Internet Union has had some internal reasons
to undertake the policy,~T says Bayadayan. ~SThe thing is that that
we, the specialists, have not been informed of anything. They give
us reason to suppose they might have organized a shadow sell: they
registered a large number of domains and sold then to people who paid
them more. And now they declare the domains they did not manage to
sell ~Qopen~R. All these are, of course, suppositions.~T

The Union has in fact distributed domains of special significance to
various individuals and organizations since its creation. Among them
is hayastan.am, yerevan.am, diaspora.am.

To the question of why a number of known domains were sold if
supervision over them was set, the president of the Internet Union
answered: ~SIt is now useless to go deep into all that stuff. All
those domains are declared ~Qopen~R already.~T

PATIENT PENSIONERS: THE DOCTOR WILL SEE YOU NOW ~V FOR FREE

By Gayane Abrahamyan, ArmeniaNow Reporter

Pensioners over 65 will now be entitled to free medical treatment at
walk-in clinics in Armenia following an order from the Health Ministry.

Previously, free treatment was available only to impoverished families,
disabled people and families of those killed in the war over Nagorno
Karabakh. The elderly, whose pensions were only 6,000-8,000 drams
per month, were expected to pay even for consultations, which cost
between 1,000 and 2,000 drams.

Susanna Ghazaryan, a senior specialist at the Department for First
Medical Help at the Ministry of Health, says the free service is
intended for the entire population beginning next year. Although
pensioners were given the right to free treatment in January, many
remain unaware of it.

In 2004, 8.7 billion drams was allotted for the program and 12.4
billion this year.

Nazeli Minasyan, 68, says she attended Polyclinic Number One in
Yerevan a month ago for check-ups on her heart, but had to pay for
the cardiologist~Rs consultation and for her cardiogram. She says she
has receipts for payment of her treatment and intends to ask for her
money back.

~SI paid 1,500 drams to the doctor, and 2,000 for cardiogram; the bad
thing is that they did not give me any advice,~T complains Minasyan
anxiously.

At Polyclinic Number 8 in Arabkir community, Doctor Anahit Sargsyan
says medics strictly observe the new system and treat all pensioners
for free.

~SFrom this year, even the calls are free for them; in our clinics
only the sonogram survey is charged for as it does not belong to
the clinic. All of the rest, the analyses, the cardiogram, the ECG,
Roentgen are free for pensioners and for chronic patients,~T says
Sargsyan.

According to nurse Nonna Zakaryan, staff welcome this new law on free
check-ups. She says: ~SIn my family I have parents-in-law over 65,
my father-in-law~Rs heart should be checked at least once a year. How
can one manage that with the 6,000 drams they get?~T

However Zakaryan believes that doctors will work for free and
attentively only when they receive proper salaries. At Polyclinic
Number 8, doctors are paid 20-25,000 drams ($35-44) per month while
nurses get 15,000 drams ($26). In other Polyclinics, such as those
in Davitashen and Nor Nork, doctors get more than 35,000 drams
(determined by the Government).

~SThere are Polyclinics where they get 10,000 more drams, but how
does that happen when both of us are run by the State? We serve the
same amount of the population, but they work full-time and we were
cut to 75 per cent. It depends on them to treat the way they want,~T
says Zakaryan.

Open door days are also planned across the country in May for
pensioners and veterans of the Great Patriotic War. On these days the
best specialists of the republic will survey and prescribe treatments
to the elderly. ~SMedicines will be distributed, partially for free,
partially for a 30 percent discount,~T says Ghazaryan at the Ministry
of Health.

A partnership between the Ministries of Health and Defense has also
ensured that 200 free trips to the spa resorts of Arzni and Jermuk will
be available for veterans of World War Two to enjoy rest and treatment.
According to the Veterans~R Union, there are 12,000 veterans of the
Second World War in Armenia. Some are skeptical about who will be
chosen to receive the spa treatments.

Vladimir Abrahamyan, an 82-year-old disabled veteran, his suit
decorated with medals, said: ~SIt~Rs obvious that it will be those
who have relatives in the ministries. I reached as far as Berlin,
I~Rll see whether they let me go or they will push their own people.~T

SERVICE OR PUNISHMENT?: ARMENIA~RS ALTERNATIVE MILITARY SERVICE
QUESTIONED BY PARTICIPANTS

By Vahan Ishkhanyan, ArmeniaNow Reporter

Twenty-four young people whose religious convictions do not allow
them to serve in the army were enlisted for alternative labor
service last autumn. They serve in hospitals and homes for elderly
people. Twenty-two of them are Jehovah~Rs witnesses.

Non-military service became possible after a law on alternative service
was passed in December 2003. However, many of the servicemen regret
to have opted for alternative service and say that they would prefer
rejecting service altogether and going to prison.

The reason, they say, is that labor service is conducted by the
military regime, is controlled by military police and by 1.5 years
longer ~V 42 months or 3.5 years.

~SIf it continues like this, it is better to be in prison,~T
says 18-year-old Vagharsh Margaryan, who, together with his three
fellow-believers, is serving in Sevan~Rs mental hospital.

They are not allowed to leave the premises of the hospital, they
work without days off and wear uniforms, on the back of which it is
written: ~SAlternative Labor Service~T. Military police pay visits
once every 10 days and inspect their service. In fact, their service
is not civil. In their cards it is written: ~SRA Armed Forces~T.

By becoming a member of the Council of Europe, Armenia assumed
obligations to adopt a law on alternative civil service and before
that release from prisons draft dodgers who rejected to be enrolled
in the army for their religious convictions. About 150 Jehovah~Rs
witnesses had been put in jail for refusing service in the army.

~SThe authorities wanted to adopt a law on military alternative
service (that is, service in military units without carrying
weapons), however Europe demanded that a law on alternative civil
service be adopted,~T says Armenia Helsinki Committee Chairman Avetik
Ishkhanyan. ~SIt was under pressure from the Council of Europe that
alternative labor service was included into the law besides military
alternative. However, this is not a civil service and contradicts
the European standards.~T

According to those standards, civil service must not be controlled by
the military, be without uniform and not exceed the term of military
service.

Ishkhanyan says that the authorities in fact try to cheat Europe by
presenting military-controlled labor service as civil service.

According to the information provided by the Helsinki Committee, one
serviceman at Vardenis~R mental boarding house had a broken collarbone
and he was taken to hospital. However, there the military put pressure
on him and he returned without getting proper treatment. Now he is
serving with a dislocated collarbone.

Sevan Mental Hospital workers complain that they are not allowed to go
to town to participate in religious gatherings. ~SWe ask them to let us
go out twice a week for two hours, but it is prohibited. People from
military police come and threaten that if we leave the premises,
they will put us in the guardhouse,~T says 19-year-old Boris
Melkumyan. Hospital director Gagik Karapetyan says that like in the
army, here too, until six months of service is completed, they will
not be allowed to go off the premises.

Nevertheless, the guys are not dissatisfied with their work. They work
in construction and do sanitary-inspecting work, distribute meals,
see that patients do not behave in a disorderly way and cause no
harm to one another. The administration also demands that they clean
patients~R waste, however the servicemen have refused, saying that
it is a humiliating job.

~SIf they are faithful indeed, then why don~Rt they follow the
precepts? It is said in the Bible: love your neighbor ~V but they do
not love, if they loved, they would clean the waste of the patients,~T
says the hospital~Rs head physician Aram Alexanyan.

Vagharshak Margaryan replies that it is not that they either love the
patient or not, but they do not accept the offered conditions. ~SIf
their goal is to send us for such jobs, it is they who do not love
us and humiliate us.~T Previously, National Assembly Deputy Speaker
Vahan Hovhannisyan said that alternative service should be shameful.
Nevertheless, they do not force the men to do dirty work. However,
according to the data of the Helsinki Committee, a serviceman at
Yerevan~Rs boarding house situated in Nork is forced to do humiliating
work.

The hospital~Rs administration has no clear idea of how to deal with
the men, as no order of alternative service was provided to them,
but they received only verbal instructions, as Alexanyan says, ~Swe
are guided by our horse sense~T. Generally, the mental hospital has
no need for additional labor force, and the alternative servicemen
are not of much use: ~SIt would be good if I were far from this
headache,~T says the mental hospital~Rs director Gagik Karapetyan.

Not all of Jehovah~Rs witnesses agreed to alternative
service. Currently, 18 Jehovah~Rs witnesses are in jail for refusing
to be enrolled for service. They refuse to be enrolled for alternative
service considering it humiliating and too long.

MANANA: A DECADE PROVIDING FOOD FOR HUNGRY MINDS

By Suren Musayelyan ArmenianNow Reporter

Eleven-year-old Armen Babayan isn~Rt being a truant. Simply sometimes
the fifth former leaves boring school lessons earlier to spend more
time at Manana.

It is ten years that children like Armen have the opportunity to
attend the Manana youth educational-cultural center where they can
learn journalism, translation skills, computer graphics and web
design, painting, photography and filmmaking as well as many other
useful subjects.

The center~Rs director Ruzanna Baghdasaryan says the idea to set up
the center arose still when the country was in crisis, when many
children didn~Rt attend school because they were either closed or
poorly heated in winter. ~SWe wanted to keep children busy and make
their lives more interesting,~T she says.

According to Baghdasaryan, very few children attended the center at
first. But then the number of pupils gradually increased to up to a
hundred a year and now, she says, about a thousand children have passed
through this center. The first recognition of Manana came in 1996 when
their newspaper ~SKhabarbzik~T won the first prize of UNICEF as the
~Sbest initiative of the year~T. Since then, according to Baghdasaryan,
Manana pupils have won numerous prizes both at home and abroad.

In 2004, she says, Manana won grand prizes at 17 international
contests. About a 100 children aged 8-18 currently attend the center
where they are involved in different clubs. Their work is available
to the public online as they now have their own website created and
maintained by the center itself.

Baghdasaryan says that they have children from different social
backgrounds and that there are no selection criteria like exams
or competitions. There is no tuition fee at Manana, there is
only membership fee, which is 2,000 drams a month, about five
dollars. But according to Baghdasaryan, they do not take money from
all children. She says there are children from poor families for whom
they even cover their travel expenses. ~SWe have not so many children
from rich families, though. Perhaps they think that something which
is free is not good,~T says Baghdasaryan.

For many years Manana worked on pure enthusiasm, without any external
support. ~SI have noticed that many international organizations in
Armenia tend to fund programs that have a more humanitarian nature,
such as feeding the poor, while they simply have no funds designated
for programs like this one that develops creative abilities,~T
Baghdasaryan says. ~SThey think that to make a film is for a satisfied
person only. If an Armenian child doesn~Rt make a film he will not
die. That~Rs what most of them think.~T

Nor do they get any assistance from the government. Baghdasaryan
says that when they were given a week to find a new office or face
eviction three years ago she wrote letters to authorities, but there
was no response. ~SOur government thinks they have much more important
things to take care of,~T says Baghdasaryan. ~SSimply I think that
we are a little ahead of our time and therefore cannot demand much.~T

Perhaps they would have to close but for the assistance provided by
the Tufenkian Foundation, which undertook to rent a new office on 2
Baghramyan Avenue in Yerevan.

~SOf course we have problems with our material-technical base and
sometimes it seems fantastic to have made such achievements on the
international arena with so many difficulties and so few resources,~T
says Baghdasaryan. ~SManana~T worked closely with UNICEF producing
short films, which later won prizes at international festivals. Now,
Baghdasaryan says, they have an offer from the UN Youth Orchestra to
produce a film for their Bach concert in Hamburg on March 15. ~SIt~Rs
an honor for us and for Armenia. But that~Rs honor, not money,~T
she says.

Many of Manana alumni stay in the center even after graduating. Arpine
Grigoryan, 20, is a fourth-year student at the Engineering University
now. After attending Manana for almost eight years, she now works
there on the center~Rs website and teaches children web design. ~SThe
experience I got here helps me a lot. I not only work on the website. I
come here every day after classes. I can say this is my second home,~T
she says.

Arpine also participates in film production. Her ~SCarousel~T film
was nominated for a prize at an international festival in Amsterdam
and was recently shown on the BBC.

Anna Javakhyan, 23, recently graduated from the Philological Department
of the Teachers~R Training University. Now she teaches children to
write their own stories. ~SI loved Manana very much and attended
the center with great pleasure. Now I teach children here with great
pleasure too,~T she says. ~SThere is ability in every child. Simply
he needs to have aspiration. I think the atmosphere here is perfect
for generating this aspiration.~T

The work of Manana children can be seen at: and

IN PRAISE OF WOMEN: FESTIVAL HOPES TO PROMOTE GENDER ISSUES

By Gayane Lazarian, ArmeniaNow Reporter

The opening of an international women~Rs festival on the ~SWomen~Rs
Dialogue~T subject was announced at NPAK (Modern Experimental Art
Center) on March 8. The festival will continue until March 14.

The festival was opened with feminist works at the exhibition hall. It
was accompanied by electronic music presented by female DJs from
abroad. Women~Rs dialogue was conducted not only through the presented
works, but also through live contacts.

In the works ~SThesis~T, ~SExercise~T, ~SAction~T the same girl is
trying to show the balance in life which is necessary for her from a
young age. The author of the pictures is Cristina Ohlmer from Germany.

~SIt is the first time I am in Armenia, and I think that it is an
amazing initiative to be able to present a woman from different
perspectives through art,~T she says.

The idea of the festival belongs to Yeva Khachatryan, who is the
festival curator. Yeva says that March 8 was not chosen by chance.

~SWhat is March 8 in the Armenian society? This day means getting
presents and flowers from men. Even April 7, which was adopted after
the collapse of the Soviet Union, is just another version of the
Russian-Armenian March 8 by its contents. Today, we call on women to
remember the sense and history of the International Women~Rs Day,
whose Armenian version is a picture opposite to reality,~T the
curator explains.

~SWe show problems through art at this festival. I believe and am
convinced that especially modern art contains the power through which
it is possible to do that. Of course, in our country it is generally
difficult to make changes, but we can achieve result if the festival
becomes continuous,~T says Yeva.

A male leather belt is proudly hanging from one of the walls of the
hall, from this belt modestly are hanging different kitchen ware
~V a rolling-pin, a mallet, a crusher, a ladle, a crimp sealer. The
leather belt seems to be overseeing the mild talk of the tools and
allows them to show off to viewers.

The author is artist Arevik Arevshatyan. She says that the work is
called ~SFidelity Belt~T.

~SDuring crusades when men went to war they locked their women so that
they remained faithful. With this work I want to say that there are
criteria by which the society understands a woman~Rs mission. That is,
the presence in the kitchen is a woman~Rs primary mission. It is the
heritage that reaches every woman and no one but them can remove it.~T

According to Arevshatyan, she became interested in feminist
movements in the 1990s. And the festival is another step towards the
establishment of feminism in Armenia.

UNDP Women~Rs Rights Department Manager Kristina Khenshen says that
generally people speak about feminism and feminist views with fear
and difficulty not only in Armenia but also in other CIS countries.

~SAt this festival feminist views are presented through women~Rs
works. That~Rs what dialogue consist in and a question arises ~V what
is a woman~Rs status in Armenia today?~T says Khenshen.

Khenshen considers what is happening at NPAK to be very important for
the establishment of feminism in Armenia. If there are issues between
the rights of men and women, they should be corrected in some way,
especially if both know the possibilities well. ~SIf the situation
is settled, all this is feminism to me. It is the first feminist
step. It is very important to bring the intellectual dialogue of
different women to one space, which is public,~T says Khenshen.

Yeva Khachatryan says that women~Rs rights are infringed upon in
Armenian society.

~SAnd here the main restraining factor is not the law, but the
not-so-progressive mentality of our society which, even embracing
European values, is incapable of rejecting traditional ideas
accumulated over centuries,~T says Yeva. Arevshatyan also thinks that
similar events will bring in changes in society because it is guided by
international models. Armenian women themselves must understand their
model ~V what do they like: an oriental standard or the western one?

~SI think that with our ideals we are more inclined towards the
European model. Women have rights in family, society and defend
them. Simply all this is in a closed state and is observed only
in families. It needs to come out to public discussion,~T says the
painter.

Practical workshops on the subject of ~SStop Violence against Women~T
will also be held as part of the festival, led by social worker Marlen
Reissle from Norway.

~SPrivate talks will be held with 30 women, we~Rll try to be of use
in solving their problems. The first week of the festival will be
the most active, symposiums will be held on three days during one
week. ~STsovinar~T NGO, which also deals with these problems, will
also participate,~T says Yeva.

The main sponsor of the festival is the UN Gender Policy Program. About
$4,500 will be spent on the festival. One of the walls of the
exhibition hall is declared to be the ~SWall of Love~T. Small pieces of
paper patches are full of quatrains devoted to the woman and love. The
visitors read or add a couplet of their choice.

www.armenianow.com
www.mibanasem.com
www.mananayouth.org

Coordinator Of ITG For Search Of The Missing,Hostages and Pows In Th

COORDINATOR OF ITG FOR SEARCH OF THE MISSING, HOSTAGES AND POWS IN
THE ZONE OF KARABAKH CONFLICT ONCE MORE VISITS THE AZERBAIJANI POWS
KEPT IN STEPANAKERT

STEPANAKERT, MARCH 9. ARMINFO. Within the frameworks of the agreements
with NKR authorities, Coordinator of the International Task Group
for search of the missing, hostages and POWs in the zone of Karabakh
conflict Albert Voskanyan once more visited the Azerbaijani POWs kept
in Stepanakert – Khayal Abdullayev, Khikmet Tagiyev and Ruslan Bakirov.

In his interview to ARMINFO, Albert Voskanyan said that the POWs had
no complaints, they were in a good state and expressed desire to
return home. “It is my second visit. In conformity with my duties
of coordinator, I have informed the co-chairmen and other regional
coordinators of ITG of the visits,” Voskanyan said. It should be
noted that the NKR Defense Army took hostages the above soldiers of
the Azerbaijani army on 15 February 2005 in the northeastern section
of the contact-line of the Azerbaijani and Karabakh armed forces when
they were crossing the demarcation line.