Rabbit Ears Are For TV Reception, Right? Not Always.

RABBIT EARS ARE FOR TV RECEPTION, RIGHT? NOT ALWAYS.

Mobilemag.com
Aug. 10, 2006

A French company has come up with a plastic rabbit that talks to you
in a Wi-Fi sort of way, reading emails, SMS transmissions, traffic
updates, sports scores and all manner of other Internet-related
information. The hard part is remembering the rabbit’s name. It’s
Nabaztag, which is Armenian for "rabbit." (The creator is Armenian,
so that’s what he called it. You can call it anything you like,
including incredible.)

Nabaztag’s 9-inch-tall body lights up when it speaks or sings (another
one of its talents). It also has the power to wiggle its ears. All of
this is predicated, however, on your home’s Wi-Fi network capabilities.

So far, 50,000 of the little rabbits have been sold in France, Belgium,
Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. They should be available in the
U.S. and Canada soon, and the American price will be US$150.

Signs Of Reason From Centuries

SIGNS OF REASON FROM CENTURIES
Hakob Badalyan

Lragir.am
9 Aug 06

Most probably, the dispute over the historical mission of Armenians
emerged earlier than the Armenians. Although it is highly disputable
whether the Armenians emerged at all. It is possible that they are
just forming although the scientists might know better, maybe also
the clergy of the Armenian Apostolic Church, who have often come in
touch with the Armenians in different historical periods. Perhaps
nobody knows the answer to this question. And it is interesting that
nobody seeks for the answer. Everyone is interested in the historical
mission of the nation rather than its being or not being. But it is
already good if there is at least one thing connected with the nation
that interests some people.

However, it is bad that some people decide to fulfill this mission
without knowing what the historical mission of the nation is and
without having the answer to this question. This is not terrible but
when these "apostles" set out, the ending is always the same.

And what happens always? Extreme. Some people think the purpose of the
nation is revenge and a sea of blood, others think that the misison
of the nation is to act as the dove of peace and solidarity in the
South Caucasus. Moreover, it is a rather new mission, the so-called
"revelation of our days" versus the "vision of blood". That mission
did not justify itself, and it seems there is no hope that it will do,
and now we are assuming the new mission of a peacekeeper, hoping that
it will justify itself.

The image of a peacekeeper has not been more effective than the
bayonets. And now the Armenians are going through transition from
bayonets to headscarves used so far by Muslim women, who throw their
headscarves between fighters to reconcile them. I did not recall
the Muslim women accidentally because the example of one of them
prompted me to write about the mission of our nation. Several days
ago Arzu Abdullayeva, the representative of Helsinki Civil Assembly
of Azerbaijan was invited to Armenia and Karabakh. It is clear
that the invitation is in the framework of European peace loving,
which is often expressed in grant programs. Armenia and Karabakh
was opened before Abdullayeva. They even took her to the prison of
Shushi to prove that there are no Azerbaijani prisoners there. As if
Abdullayeva would go to Baku and declare jihad to release hostages
if she did not become convinced that there are no hostages in the
prison of Shushi. As if in Baku they were waiting for her appeal to
become convinced and capture the prison of Shushi. In other words, we
narrowly escaped the Azerbaijani tornado, when they took Abdullayeva
to the prison of Shushi. Well, she became convinced that there are
no prisoners, she went to Baku and announced that she had never seen
worse conditions than in the prison of Shushi.

It is possible that Abdullayeva made a correct observation, maybe
the worst conditions in the world are in the prison of Shushi. But at
least this should make Armenians not to take Abdullayeva to Shushi and
show her around the prison. They should have thought before taking her
to the prison that if an Armenian defender of human rights wished to
visit a similar place in Azerbaijan, he or she would never come back,
they would not even show this place to him or her on the map. Whereas
we open everything, let them come and see and go and tell whatever
they want. It is important that Europe can see how open we are,
how very open. And Europe likes open things, no matter what.

The same was with the Azerbaijani news reporter invited to Armenia
several weeks ago, when he came and stayed in Armenia for several
days. Certain representatives of the public sector shed peace-loving
feelings, whereas he went back to Azerbaijan and mocked at the week
spent in Armenia.

The Azerbaijanis visiting Armenia and Karabakh do not do anything
condemnable. They do not come here to make up with us; they come to
study us and when they get back home, they tell what they and their
public need, to convince that they are better than Armenia. In other
words, in Azerbaijan they do not think about the historical mission,
they think what mission they have now. And now they have a common
mission – to discredit the Armenians and Armenia. They do not care for
Europe. Maybe because they have oil and they do not care if Europe
likes it open or closed. It is also possible that the Azerbaijanis
are not suffering from the syndrome of peace loving because they
have never suffered from this disease. Maybe everything is ahead for
them. But we are concerned about our problem. By the way, by saying our
problem we must imply the same nation they think about day and night
and is opened to the world to come and see and compare. It would be
too good if they appreciated. They do not do, they go and say that it
is the worst. Of course, it is not. And we can see when some people
made money by shouting revenge and calling for struggle for decades,
and now others have realized that money is in eternal love. However,
it should not be forgotten that love for money, even if it is eternal
love, is given another name.

Of course, this does not mean that Armenia should go in for militarism
and lock its doors. No, absolutely no, as one of our presidents
would say. But not every door can be opened. How about national
traditions? But you cannot live on the tradition, and Europe does not
give much importance to traditions. In this case, it would be good
if it were possible to stop somewhere, in the middle of the passage,
when we would be rather far from bayonets and the headscarves. But
the Armenians have never managed to stop in the right place and time
to manage this time.

The nation is going ahead, but it does not know where it is going
to stop.

Armenia Ranks 79 in Free Countries Index

ARMENIA RANKS 79 IN FREE COUNTRIES INDEX

PanARMENIAN.Net
07.08.2006 17:54 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The 2006 State of World Liberty Index ranks countries
from most to least libertarian by compiling information from four
freedom indices into one single index. The indices used were: The
Heritage Foundation/Wall Street Journal, the Frasier Institute/Cato
Institute, Freedom House, Reporters without Borders. The countries
were broken into three criteria: individual freedom, economic freedom
and government size/taxation and averaged.

According to the index, the freest region is Europe whole the freest
country is Estonia. "The world is not free," the experts say. The
world receives a failing score of 56.9% out of 100.

The mangled corpse of the Soviet Union is stretched across the list,
with the Baltic states of Estonia (#1), Lithuania (#16) and Latvia
(#21) all making the top 25 after embracing free market liberalism,
while their neighbor Belarus (#153) and the Asian countries
Turkmenistan (#154) and Uzbekistan (#152) dangle in the bottom
ten. Armenia (#79), Russia (#124), Kazakhstan (#132), Tajikistan (#141)
and Azerbaijan (#137) are also struggling in a post-Soviet world.

North Korea is at the bottom of this list, with a score of 6.2%.

Aiming at Karabakh: Azerbaijan Conducts Military Exercises for Liber

AIMING AT KARABAKH;
AZERBAIJAN CONDUCTS MILITARY EXERCISES FOR LIBERATION OF OCCUPIED TERRITORIES

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
August 7, 2006 Monday

by Sokhbet Mamedov

AZERBAIJAN: ANTITERRORIST EXERCISES OR TESTING OF A FORCEFUL SOLUTION
FOR THE KARABAKH PROBLEM?; Exercises for checking combat training
of the Interior Forces of the Interior Ministry of Azerbaijan were
held in the Khyzinsky District of the country having relief similar
to relief of the problematic Nagorno-Karabakh region.

Exercises for checking combat training of the Interior Forces of the
Interior Ministry of Azerbaijan were held in the Khyzinsky District
of the country having relief similar to relief of the problematic
Nagorno-Karabakh region. Such exercises are organized periodically
but the latest exercises differ from the previous ones. First,
together with an operation for neutralization of terrorists the troops
stormed a mountain height defended by a conventional enemy. Second,
the exercises were organized for the first time in the newly built
training center in the north of the country and reminded rather of a
military operation for taking an enemy’s position. Interestingly,
Azerbaijani Interior Minister Ramil Usubov who had been born in
Nagorno-Karabakh watched the exercises.

Meanwhile, the press service of the Interior Ministry advised
journalists to focus attention on these circumstances and rejected
any connection with the choice of the place for the exercises and
with participation of servicemen of the Interior Ministry in possible
combat operations in Nagorno-Karabakh.

According to analyst Alpay Akhmed, it is necessary to take conduction
of such exercises with understanding. Armed Forces and Interior
Forces of the country that has 20% of the territory "occupied by
the neighboring country" should be prepared to liberate the occupied
territories any time. Moreover, so that official Baku does not rule
out a military way for resolving the drawn out conflict with Armenia
about Nagorno-Karabakh and is building up its military potential.
Incidentally, recently President of Azerbaijan Ilkham Aliyev announced
that the budget of the Armed Forces of Azerbaijan would be increased
by $100 million to $700 million.

Interestingly, the exercises were conducted immediately after
departure of the American co-chair of the Minsk group of OSCE for
regulation of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict from Baku. There
the co-chair held meetings with the Interior Ministry and with the
President of Azerbaijan, after which he announced that chances for
resolving the conflict in the first half of 2007, were sufficiently
high. Earlier, intermediaries announced an intention to solve this
problem in 2006. Now they postpone the deadline for six months, which
shows that they fail to move positions of the conflicting parties
closer. In such circumstances official Baku has nothing else left
besides buildup of its military potential and to turn to a forceful
solution of the problem in case of failure of peace talks.

Source: Nezavisimaya Gazeta, August 04, 2006, p. 6

Translated by Pavel Pushkin

Armenia – 2004 Annual Report by Reporters Without Borders

ARMENIA – 2004 ANNUAL REPORT

Reporters without borders (press release), France
Aug. 7, 2006

Many violations of press freedom occurred during the reelection of
President Robert Kocharian. A new law on freedom of information was
enacted but a new press law drew strong protests from the media.

President Robert Kocharian was reelected president in 2003 after a vote
(the first since the country joined the Council of Europe in 2001) that
was marred by irregularities and sharply criticised by observers from
the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). For
the first time in the history of independent Armenia, a TV debate
between two of the candidates was shown live. But coverage of the
two-stage voting on 19 February and 5 March was obstructed in many
places and independent media journalists were harassed, set upon and
physically attacked. State-run media did not give balanced coverage
to all candidates and openly backed Kocharian, while most independent
media supported other candidates. The two independent TV stations, A1+
and Noyan Tapan, whose operating licences were cancelled in 2002 by
the National Broadcasting Commission, were unable to broadcast. The
commission is not independent and does not meet Council of Europe
standards because all its members are appointed by the president.
Conflicting measures were passed by parliament. A freedom of
information law was adopted on 23 September after two years of work
with Council of Europe experts and national and international NGOs.
It spelled out the rights of journalists and citizens to information
and required public bodies to supply it. But a few days later,
parliament approved on first reading a controversial press law that
provoked sharp reaction from the media, who said they would suggest
detailed improvements to it. The new criminal code that came into force
on 1 August, included prison terms of up to three years for defamation.

New information on a journalist killed in 2002

The trial of 13 people accused of killing Tigran Naghdalian, head of
the council of public TV and radio, in Yerevan on 28 December 2002,
opened on 29 July 2003. They included businessman Armen Sarkisian, who
is the brother of two former prime ministers (opposed to Kocharian)
– Aram Sarkisian and Vazgen Sarkisian, who was killed in a commando
attack on the parliament building in October 1999. The public
prosecutor suspected Armen, who had been held since 15 March, of
ordering the murder because he believed the journalist was involved
in the attack that killed his brother. The other brother, Aram,
charged that Armen’s trial was a bid to discredit the opposition in
the run-up to the parliamentary and presidential elections. Naghdalian,
a major supporter of the president and a key figure at the TV station
since 1998, was shot dead in front of his parents’ home by a mystery
gunman. The authorities immediately called the murder political
because the journalist had often criticised the opposition in a
current affairs programme he presented.

Five journalists physically attacked

During the first round of the presidential election on 19 February
2003, an official at the Nar-Dos School polling station 356/16 in
Yerevan seized the camera and injured the hand of freelance journalist
Susanna Pogosian, who was there with reporter Gideon Lichfield of
the British weekly The Economist. The same day, Goar Verziryan,
of the opposition National Democratic Union’s weekly paper Aizhm,
was thrown against a wall at the Shirvanzade School polling station
in Yerevan by people who seized a tape recording she was making about
defects in the voting procedure. Others hit two journalists from the
TV station Shant and took away their videotapes as they were filming a
man putting several voting slips into a ballot box. Mher Galechian,
of the twice-weekly opposition paper Chorrord Ishxanutiun, was
beaten up on 29 April by two men who came to the paper’s offices in
Yerevan. He was hospitalised with head injuries and an investigation
was launched. The men had come to the offices three days earlier
to complain about a 25 April article that accused Karlos Petrosian,
head of the state security service, of building himself a villa in
shady circumstances. The day of the attack, the paper had printed an
article reporting the earlier visit. Gayaneh Mukoyan (editor) and
Rafael Hovakimyan (managing editor) of the weekly Or, were attacked
in front of Mukoyan’s home by four thugs who boxed in their car,
said they were police, ordered them to get out and then hit them. Ms
Mukoyan said the attack was probably linked to articles the previous
month about organised crime.

New information about a journalist attacked in 2002

Investigative journalist Mark Grigorian, former correspondent in
Armenia for Reporters Without Borders and deputy head of the Caucasus
Media Institute, received a letter from the prosecutor-general’s office
in late February 2003 saying the case file on a grenade attack that
seriously wounded him in a street of the capital on 22 October 2002
had been closed since no suspect had been found four months after
the attack. Grigorian had blamed the attempt to kill him on people
opposed to his enquiry into the 27 October 1999 commando attack on
parliament, in which eight people were killed.

Two journalists threatened

Freelance journalist Vahagn Ghukasian announced on 24 January 2003 he
was leaving the country because of police harassment after he found
"definitive proof" that top officials were involved in the October 1999
commando attack on parliament. He later left the country. John Hughes,
editor of the online weekly Armenianow, informed military prosecutor
Gagik Jhangirian in a 4 November letter that one of his journalists,
Janna Alexanian, had received phone threats from the father of two
soldiers murdered on 6 August in Vanadzor and about whom the journalist
had written an article on 15 August. Their father accused her of
defending the killers. Hughes said the complaint was in fact triggered
by Alexanian writing that the soldiers’ family was involved in the
petrol business. The threats stopped soon after the letter was sent.

Harassment and obstruction

The central elections board refused to accredit any online media
during the two-stage presidential and parliamentary elections in
February, March and May 2003. It had ruled on 22 August 2002 that
only media registered with the justice ministry could be recognised.
But since websites are not legally considered media, online newspapers
are not obliged to register. Lilit Vardanian, an official of polling
station 073/26 in Eshmiadzin (20 km from Yerevan), refused to allow
Karina Asatrian, of the independent TV station A1+, and her cameraman
Robert Kharazian to film the first round of voting in the presidential
election on 19 February. The journalists were then attacked by people
who damaged their camera and chased them out of the polling station.
Diana Markosian, also of A1+, was stopped the same day by the head
of polling station 0391/17 in Yerevan, Ararat Rshtubi. Police helped
him remove the journalist. Relay transmission of the Russian station
NTV by the firm Paradise was suspended between 26 February and 17
March, officially for technical reasons. But opposition activists
suspected it was cut off because the station had shown opposition
demonstrations against election irregularities. Nane Adjemyan, of
the TV station Kentron TV, was victimised in late February because
President Kocharian’s campaign officials did not like her impartial
coverage of the campaign. After she reported on a press conference by
opposition candidate Stepan Dermichian, who highlighted violations
of election rules, the station’s news editor, Nikolaï Grigorian,
asked the journalist to take some time off. When she found out
that one of Kocharian’s election team had earlier called the station
management to complain about her coverage, she resigned on 26 February.
Only two state-run TV cameramen were allowed to film live Kocharian’s
swearing-in for another term as president on 9 April. All other
journalists, pro-government or independent, were forced to cover it
from a TV screen elsewhere in the building. Parliament amended the
criminal code on 18 April to further restrict press freedom. Articles
135 (defamation) and 136 (insults) now provide up to three years
imprisonment and fines equivalent to between 100 and 200 times a
person’s minimum monthly salary (between 750 and 1,500 euros). Article
318 calls for two years in prison and a fine equal to between 200 and
400 minimum salaries (between 1,500 and 3,000 euros). The Organisation
for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), along with diplomats,
human rights organisations and journalists, sent an open letter
of concern on 19 June to the new spokesman for parliament, Arthur
Baghdasarian, who said on 25 June the code should be amended because
it was unfair that penalties for defaming government officials and
ordinary citizens were different. But no action had been taken
by the end of the year. Officials of the state telecommunications
authority in Alarverdi (Lori region) cut off broadcasts of the local TV
station Ankyun+3 on 20 May officially because it had not complied with
technical requirements and not broadcast government programmes. The
station’s editor, Hrachya Papinyan, said the cut-off came five days
before parliamentary elections and was for political reasons, since the
station had not supported candidate Hovhannes Qochinyan, brother of the
regional administrator. A week earlier, tax officials began inspecting
the station’s accounts. It was able to resume broadcasting on 21 May.
The National Broadcasting Commission refused once again, on 18 July,
to grant operating licences to the country’s two main independent
TV stations, A1+ and Noyan Tapan, after bids had been received
for frequencies to serve the Yerevan region, on grounds that their
programme proposals were not good enough. The two general-interest
stations, which provide a balanced alternative to pro-government and
state-run stations, have not been able to broadcast since 2 April 2002,
when the commission refused to renew their licences. They had also been
unsuccessful in an earlier round of bidding for seven-year licences.
Police seized a videotape on 30 July from ALM TV cameraman Narek
Martirosyan, who had just filmed them roughing up a woman who had
been demonstrating in front of the presidential palace in Yerevan.
Parliament approved on first reading on 24 September a controversial
new press law, which obliges media to declare their funding sources
(article 13) and limits the shareholding in them of commercial
companies and foreigners and restricts the distribution of foreign
newspapers in the country (article 9). These clauses were seen by
journalists as weapons for the government to use against media it
did not like. The law also curbs press freedom in time of war, if
there is a threat to national security and if a state of emergency is
declared. The new law drew strong reactions from several journalists’
organisations, which decided to suggest amendments to the measure.

–Boundary_(ID_ya2A9/TF+xPU2tBzmcDe7w)–

NATO Highlights Peaceful Settlement of Conflicts in South Caucasus

NATO Highlights Peaceful Settlement of Conflicts in South Caucasus

PanARMENIAN.Net
31.07.2006 16:30 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The key security aspects are political issues
including the Euro-Atlantic integration of the South Caucasian states,
the integration with EU and NATO, the national security concept,
national defense strategy and foreign policy goals, NATO Liaison
Officer in the Caucasus Romualds Razuks said in an interview with
PanARMENIAN.Net. In his words, it’s essential to develop practical
regional cooperation among the partners from the South Caucasus and
the Black Sea region as well as with Russia.

"One of the principal directions is combating terrorism. We also
highlight struggle against corruption and bringing of the national
legislation in line with international standards, ratification
of relevant CoE conventions (e.g. social chapter, national
minorities). The IPAP also provides for steps towards economic reforms
including remuneration system for public servants, management of
public enterprises, privatization process, state procurement process,
statistical records for tax collection, foreign trade and balance
payments statistics, antimonopoly legislation and competition policy,"
he said.

The NATO Liaison Officer underscored that NATO attaches importance
to a peaceful settlement of conflicts. "We consider that the leading
role in the peaceful conflict resolution policy belongs to the OSCE
and U.N. The measures include determination of status of autonomies,
return of refugees and IDP’s rehabilitation of conflict zones and
complementarity of actions of international organizations in Georgia.

NATO partnership policy is developing and covering new regions as
well as setting new priorities with a strategic goal of enhancing
security and stability.

South Caucasus was declared NATO’s geographical priority. New
partnership tools and schemes of cooperation including the IPAP are
introduced well adjusting them to already existing ones and making a
good use of both. Joining by Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan of the
IPAP process is a promising step towards promoting regional as well
as Euro-Atlantic security," Razuks said.

RA Ombudsman Appeals to Ombudsman of Georgia to Help 80 Armenians St

RA OMBUDSMAN APPEALS TO OMBUDSMAN OF GEORGIA TO HELP
80 ARMENIANS STUCK NEAR GORY-TSKHINVAL BORDER

AZG Armenian Daily #143, 01/08/2006

Home Issues

Recently, Armen Haroutiunian, RA Ombudsman, received an appeal
to render assistance to 80 Armenians that are stuck near the
Tskhinval-Gory border. In his turn, Mr. Haroutiunian, appealed to
Sozar Subari, People’s Ombudsman of Georgia, with the request to
settle the issue.

Besdies, Mr. Haroutiunian, sent a letter to Yervand Zakharian, Mayor
of Yerevan city. The letter includes the suggestion of Mr. Ombudsman
concerning the approval of the right for property of the Kozern
district residents.

By Sousana Margarian

Grand Master Lilit Mkrtchyan beats wrld champion Antonetta Stefanova

Grand Master of Armenia Lilit Lazarian beats world champion Antonetta
Stefanova

ArmRadio.am
28.07.2006 15:02

Grand Master of Armenia Lilit Lazarian celebrated her first victory
in the 5th round of the celebrated `Northern Ural Cup ` 2006′ chess
tournament held in Krasnoturinsk, Russia. She bet world champion,
Bulgarian Antonetta Stefanova and with 2.5 points she currently shares
the 3rd to 6th places with Russian Nadezhda Kozineva, Georgian Maya
Chiburanidze and Antonetta Stefanova. After the five rounds of the
tournament Katerina Lachno is leading with 4.5 points. The second is
Chinese Zhu Chen representing Qatar.

System dazzles Ozz

System dazzles Ozz

Toronto Star, Ontario
June 26 2006

It’s hard to believe that when Ozzfest first stormed onto the summer
touring circuit 11 years ago it was perceived as a something of a
last bastion for heavy-metal diehards.

The travelling festival – conceived by iconic hellspawn-turned-TV-dad
Ozzy Osbourne, and his business-minded wife Sharon – may have
originally marked a circling of the wagons by the metal faithful
against the dominance of the original Lollapalooza and Lilith Fair,
but it’s now one of the standards for packaged tours.

Ozzfest has only made it to Toronto once before, when Ozzy and the
reunited Black Sabbath headlined a 13-hour endurance test on the
pavement outside the Docks in 2001. And its return to Toronto at
the Molson Amphitheatre last night counted as a bit of a gamble in
a summer crowded with metal tours.

Ozzfest 2006 nevertheless lured around 14,000 souls to the Amphitheatre
last night, despite the rather disappointing absence of Osbourne (he’s
been playing the second stage on some U.S. dates but took a miss on
this one) and a lineup cut from nearly 20 acts to nine. There’s no
disputing the greatness of headliners System of a Down, but the rest
of the Toronto bill – which included fearsome hardcore unit Hatebreed,
dodgy nu-metal scowlers Disturbed, intriguing Italian unit Lacuna Coil
and the Sunset Strip-meets-Helloween stylings of Avenged Sevenfold –
didn’t present a hugely convincing reason to take the afternoon off
and head down to the lakeshore.

Luckily, System justified its placement at the top of the heap with
a smashing sequel to its last Toronto date in September.

System of a Down’s precision pummelling was fascinatingly unique,
blending galloping thrash, operatic Armenian folk, twisted ska and
synth-powered post-punk savagery in a frantic, no-fat set. The set
list had both of last year’s superb discs Mesmerize and Hypnotize to
draw from, so new(ish) numbers like the monstrous "Attack" and the
arcane power ballad "Lonely Day" were mixed seamlessly with such
crowd favourites as "Violent Pornography" and "Chop Suey!" – the
latter defying its cripplingly complex structure to become perhaps
the summer’s strangest mass singalong.

Safe from harm

Safe from harm

Blacktown Advocate (Australia)
July 26, 2006 Wednesday

AS 15-year-old Annette Mazmanians ran into her family’s arms at the
arrivals lounge of Sydney airport last week, she gave way to the
pent-up emotion of her week-long ordeal in the Middle East.

The Quakers Hill resident was one of 67 teenagers from the Armenian
dance group Hamazkayeen Sevan, who became trapped in Beirut when the
brewing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah erupted.

The exhausted dancers and their chaperones were greeted by hundreds
of emotional family members bearing flowers and balloons when they
arrived shortly after 11pm on Thursday night.

"I felt the wheels land into Sydney, I was really relieved and happy
home sweet home," Annette told reporters. "As much as you’re far away
from your parents and you have your friends around, you just want to
come back home as soon as you can."

Over the course of six highly-fraught days, the dance troupe hid in
their hotel in the city’s Christian quarter before travelling by bus
to Jordan via Syria. They then boarded three planes in Bahrain for
the long flight back to Sydney.

"As soon as we got into the bus to go to Jordan, and just to escape,
to evacuate from there, we felt one bomb and that was the closest. We
saw the buildings just go off and we felt the vibration, it was pretty
scary," she said.

Annette’s father Karl said the group had been on the last stop of a
tour which included Armenia and Syria and which should have brought
them home on July 14.

"They were only there for a brief stop over, just two days, but once
the bombs started coming in they had to stay in the hotel," he said.
"Even when you hear that they are OK and they are coming back you
still don’t 100 per per cent relax until you see them coming through
the gate."

Life is gradually returning to normal in the Mazmanians household.
Annette has returned to St Gregory’s Armenian School in Rouse Hill
and is catching up with friends and relatives.

"She won’t be going anywhere alone for a while that’s for sure,"
Mr Mazmanians chuckled. "The family is just looking to put this
behind us."

At the time of going to press, about 2,600 Australian citizens had
been evacuated from Lebanon.