World Bank Supports Armenia In Improving Public Sector Performance

WORLD BANK SUPPORTS ARMENIA IN IMPROVING PUBLIC SECTOR PERFORMANCE

Noyan Tapan
March 17, 2010

WASHINGTON, MARCH 17, NOYAN TAPAN-ARMENIANS TODAY. The World Bank’s
Board of Executive Directors approved a US million credit for the
Second Public Sector Modernization Project (PSMP II) for Armenia on
March 16. The project will assist the Government of Armenia in its
efforts to improve the quality of public services by introducing a
performance-based pay system and a code of conduct for civil servants,
and by enhancing public access to all available government information.

"Strengthening governance through improved public service delivery is
among the priorities for Bank support", said Asad Alam, World Bank
Regional Director for the South Caucasus. According to Asad Alam
though some improvements have been made in the area of governance
and anti-corruption, important challenges remain, including in the
enforcement of conflict of interest legislation pertaining to public
officials.

According to the report of the World Bank’s office in Yerevan, in
the new economic reality brought about by the global economic crisis,
public administration reform has grown even more important, as getting
better value from public expenditures and improving public services
have become a necessity. Ensuring that public service provisions do
not suffer at a time of tighter fiscal constraints requires focused
efforts to strengthen performance management.

According to Kathy Lalazaryan, head of the World Bank team designing
the project, to improve public service delivery, enhancing technology
is not enough by itself. The most crucial and difficult part is
changing behavior and organizational culture. She noted that it’s
important to have efficient public services throughout the recovery
because more than ever families are counting on the services the
government provides.

According to report of the World Bank’s office in Yerevan, this
demanding agenda will be tackled by the PSMP II, as despite progress in
civil service reform under the ongoing PSMP I, policy formulation and
implementation functions need additional strengthening. The Project
will also help build capacity for performance management, and will
support the Government’s efforts to bolster the rules regulating
conflict of interest in public service and improve enforcement.

PSMP II has three main components. It supports: (I) the design of
organizational structures in pilot institutions and improvement of
the management of business processes by streamlining and coordinating
functions; (II) making human resource management more effective,
and enhancing public service ethics and staff performance systems;
and (III) complementing and enhancing the electronic governance and
automation systems to make them accessible to the general public,
aiming for better service delivery, and more transparency and
efficiency.

The IBRD Flexible loan has a maturity of 25 years and a grace period
of 10 years included.

Since joining the World Bank in 1992 and IDA in 1993, the commitments
to Armenia total approximately US$ 1, 318, 7 million.

Germany To Allocate 105.5m Euro To Armenia

GERMANY TO ALLOCATE 105.5M EURO TO ARMENIA

News.am
March 16 2010
Armenia

March 16, German Ambassador to Armenia Hans-Jochen Schmidt and RA
Finance Minister Tigran Davtyan signed an agreement on Armenia-Germany
financial cooperation in 2009-2010 in Yerevan.

The signing was preceded by intergovernmental talks in 2009 summer,
that resulted by a long-term and reliable cooperation between the
countries in the frames of development policy, German Embassy in
Yerevan informed NEWS.am.

Agreed long-term projects include wide range of issues, from
environmental and stable economic development matters up to support
to restoring energy sector and municipal infrastructure. Germany’s
constant efforts are directed toward the improvement of living
conditions in Armenia and overcoming of transition period difficulties,
the Embassy statement reads.

Germany undertakes to allocate up to â~B¬105.5m to Armenia in 2009-2010
in the frames of bilateral financial cooperation. Besides, another
â~B¬12m will be granted for implementation of regional programs in
the frames of Caucasian initiative.

>>From 1995 to date Germany has allotted Armenia credits and grants
of about â~B¬ 220m.

British Parliament To Review Draft Measure On Armenian Genocide Reme

BRITISH PARLIAMENT TO REVIEW DRAFT MEASURE ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE REMEMBRANCE DAY

PanARMENIAN.Net
16.03.2010 11:08 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Lawmakers in London get set to deliberate over a
national day of remembrance for the Armenian Genocide. A measure is
on its way to the British Parliament that if adopted would set aside
an Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day. British lawmakers are to review
a draft of the measure this month.

Nilgun Canver, a council member in the London Borough of Haringey
that there was "no chance" the measure would pass, UPI reported.

The Armenian Genocide (1915-23) was the deliberate and systematic
destruction of the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire during
and just after World War I. It was characterized by massacres, and
deportations involving forced marches under conditions designed to
lead to the death of the deportees, with the total number of deaths
reaching 1.5 million.

The majority of Armenian Diaspora communities were formed by the
Genocide survivors.

Vladimir Akopian And Lilit Mkrtchyan Occupy 8th Place At European Ch

VLADIMIR AKOPIAN AND LILIT MKRTCHYAN OCCUPY 8TH PLACE AT EUROPEAN CHESS CHAMPIONSHIP

PanARMENIAN.Net
16.03.2010 14:10 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The European Individual Chess Championship among
women and men, bringing together 17 Armenian chess players in Rijeka
(Croatia), is underway.

On March 15 chess players completed the 9th round. Thanks to the
victory over Bojan Vuckovic (Serbia), Vladimir Akopian continues to
occupy the 8th place. He has had 7 points and is lagging behind the
new leader Ian Nepomnyashiy (Russia) by 0.5 points. Hrant Melkoumyan
lost to Artyom Timofeev (Russia) and dropped to 29th place.

In 9th round Lilith Galoyan met with Elina Danielyan and won. Now she
occupies 8th place with 6.5 points. Danielyan dropped to 36th place.

Victoria Smilayt (Lithuania) leads the table with 7.5 points.

The European Individual Chess Championship is a chess tournament
organized by the European Chess Union. It was established in
2000 and has since then taken place on a yearly basis. Apart from
determining the European Champion, another object of this tournament
is to determine a number of players who qualify for the FIDE world
championship. The tournament is held separately for men and women
as a Swiss system tournament, with a varying number of rounds. The
only exception was the first Women’s Championship tournament in 2000,
which was held as a knock-out-tournament. It should be noted that,
as with all chess competitions, the "men’s" section is in fact an
open tournament in which female players may participate, but not
vice versa. In 2002, Judit Polgarnarrowly missed the bronze medal
in the men’s competition by losing a play-off match against Zurab
Azmaiparashvili.

Apart from the first edition in 2000, where in case of a tie the
Buchholz-Rating was used as a tie-breaker, rapid-play play-off
matches were used to determine the medal winners as well as the world
championship qualifiers.

ANKARA: Time To Reconsider: The Limits Of Karabakh

TIME TO RECONSIDER: THE LIMITS OF KARABAKH
By Elnur Aslanov

Today’s Zaman
March 15 2010
Turkey

South Caucasus, 2010… Twenty-two years of conflict between Azerbaijan
and Armenia.

For those who still do not know, it is a conflict revolving around
the ancient Azerbaijani territory of Nagorno-Karabakh now occupied
by Armenia. The conflict has turned more than 1 million people into
refugees and caused enormous damage to regional economic development.

Numerous potential economic and political projects that would have
brought the South Caucasus closer to Europe have been sidelined. The
South Caucasus has sunk into an abyss of conflict, the analysis of
which has troubled the world’s leading powers. All Azerbaijanis have
been expelled from Armenia, while 20,000 Armenians still reside in
Azerbaijan. Nationalist sentiments are growing constantly in both
states. Mothers fear the beginning of war, while politicians calculate
the risks.

But for what? For the sake of "the misguided initiative" of a certain
political power that governs Armenia, a small South Caucasus republic
of about 3 million people? Nobody can disagree that the principle of
territorial integrity is a fundamental principle of international law.

And surely no one can think that Nagorno-Karabakh will ever become an
independent actor in international relations. So what is it all about?

Is it not better to live in peace in your own country and enjoy all the
boons and privileges bestowed by the social and economic development
of a country rich in energy resources?

Today, the Karabakh Armenians have food for thought. Azerbaijan is
a country of ancient traditions, at the heart of which lies tolerance.

Historically we have proved this to be true, and it has often been
used against us. We continued to live in peace with the Armenians even
after the genocide of Azerbaijanis in March 1918. We continued to
consider Baku an international city, despite the active resistance
of the Armenian population to the declaration of Azerbaijani as
the official language in the constitution of 1956. Prior to the
onset of the conflict, an elite part of the city of Baku was even
called "the Armenian settlement." We Azerbaijanis continued to see
the events of 1988, when the Armenian-Azerbaijan conflict began,
as a misunderstanding and believed that fraternal people could not
act like this. In 1988, when provocations by Armenian circles led to
bloodshed in Azerbaijani cities such as Sumgayit, many of us believed
that it would still be possible to change things. Years have passed,
but irrationality has grown in Armenia.

Today, two decades later, a TV channel and a news agency in the
Armenian language function in Azerbaijan. What about Armenia? The
answer is obvious: none. We understand better that the South Caucasus
is a common house, and we call on Armenia to renounce unconstructive
politics and halt the pressure on their compatriots.

The Armenians of Karabakh would be happy to live in houses where
there is light, warmth and amenities. They would like to enjoy the
fine infrastructure that would open them up to the intensive economic
development of Azerbaijan. Certainly, the Armenians of Karabakh dream
of the social security system, public health services, education
and other social benefits and advantages that are available to the
residents of neighboring Azerbaijani cities. Moreover, the Armenians of
Karabakh would be part of the social life of the country that they used
to live in. What have the years of conflict given to those whose lives
are in misery in Karabakh? Why do they agree with the aspirations of
"outside forces" that prevent them realizing the ideal of living in
peace in their own state, Azerbaijan?

Today Armenians live in Azerbaijan, while in Armenia there are no
Azerbaijanis. There are citizens in Azerbaijan with Armenian surnames;
there are none with Azerbaijani surnames in Armenia. We have proved
that we are capable of living together despite war and loss, pain and
sacrifice. Strangely enough, we have been tolerant of the people whose
leadership has been waging war against us for our ancient lands for 22
years. The Armenians should now prove that they are capable of living
together with us. The South Caucasus is a common house for the people
settled there, and the time has come to realize this. Armenians moved
to Karabakh a little more than two centuries ago, but we understand
that for the Armenian families that have lived there for generations
Karabakh has become a native place. However, the fact that Karabakh
belongs to the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan should not
be questioned.

Unfortunately, the Armenians of Karabakh fell hostage to the leaders
of Armenia and the field commanders who served their own mercantile
interests. War is money, and every Armenian in Karabakh should realize
that by protracting the prompt resolution of the conflict, they line
the pockets of war criminals. The military leadership understands
full well that they will never achieve their purposes and continues
to strain the situation by increasing the expenditure of an already
scarce budget on the construction of various defense systems. They
reiterate to the public the same theses that it would be possible to
ensure public security only in the case of independence. Nevertheless,
let us take a sober look. Nagorno-Karabakh, granted autonomy with
comprehensive privileges of self-administration within Azerbaijan,
will become a focus of international attention.

Undoubtedly, each step of the central authority, the leadership of
Azerbaijan in Karabakh, will be closely watched by the international
community. The nonsense that if the Armenians of Karabakh are part
of Azerbaijan their lives will get worse or they will be forced to
leave all the territories at once does not hold water. The superpowers
will ensure security guarantees for the local population. Azerbaijan
already put its signature to security guarantees for the Azerbaijani
and Armenian populations of Nagorno-Karabakh in the resolution of the
1996 Lisbon Summit. Azerbaijan is willing to return its territories
and refugees home through peaceful means and to turn Karabakh into
a prosperous region. The population of this region can only benefit
from this, be they Armenian or Azerbaijani.

It’s time to face the truth. New prospects are opening up, so it is
necessary to stand firm and thwart the pressure from outside, to decide
to live in agreement and peace for the sake of future generations. What
does the younger generation in Karabakh believe today? Fairy tales
about "independence"? But where is the life worth living: education,
pensions, public health services? It’s time to decide who will live
under what circumstances — whether to continue to create more broken
destinies, damaged lives and deprived families or to abstain from
illusory pseudo-ideas that instill only enmity and hatred.

It’s time to reconsider, but time is always pressing.

*Elnur Aslanov, Ph.D., is the chief of the department of political
analysis and information provision, Office of the President of the
Republic of Azerbaijan.

Minsk Group Format Will Not Change: Kapinos

MINSK GROUP FORMAT WILL NOT CHANGE: KAPINOS

Tert.am
17:29 ~U 15.03.10

Head of OSCE Yerevan Office Sergey Kapinos thinks it’s less likely
that the Minsk Group format may change.

"In fact, the most dangerous thing is changing the established format.

Those [changes in an established format] are unexpected turns in the
negotiating process," said Kapinos in response to a question about
a possible change in the format of the Minsk Group.

Kapinos recalled that the Minsk Group’s present format is a rather
balanced one and seems to be optimal.

"Three world players are presented [in the group]: Russia, France,
on behalf of the EU, and the US," said Kapinos.

BAKU: CICA declines to deal with settlement of Garabagh conflict

Azerbaijan Business Center
March 13 2010

CICA declines to deal with settlement of Armenia-Azerbaijan Garabagh conflict

Baku, Fineko/abc.az. The two-day session of the special workgroup and
senior officials of the Conference on Interaction & Confidence
Building Measures in Asia (CICA) finished in Baku yesterday.

Following the session deputy foreign minister Nurlan Yemekbayev of
Kazakhstan claimed that earlier military political issues had not been
advanced within the CICA framework.

`Only now we are beginning gradually to touch them carefully with
taking into account interests of all parties. In this connection the
Organization is not involved and does not consider issues of its
participation in settlement of conflicts. As a country presiding in
the OSCE, Kazakhstan is ready to do its best for settlement of
long-drawn-out conflicts, including Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno
Garabagh conflict,’ Yemekbayev said.

Currently interest to Conference’s activity is growing. Vietnam is
likely to accede to the Organization at an upcoming June summit of the
CICA member states’ heads, and possibly one or two more countries as
well.

The CICA Summit will pass Political Declaration and Convention on
Legitimacy, Immunity and Preferential Benefit of CICA, and action
plans on transport corridors, information technologies, and
environment.

At the Summit presidency in the CICA will for the first time transfer
from Kazakhstan to Turkey.

The Summit will be conducted for the first time outside of Kazakhstan
(in Istanbul, Turkey, on 8 June).

CICA was initiated by Kazakhstan in 1992 and until 2007 was dealing
with creation of legal base. Today it is numbering 20 member countries
covering 90% of Asian territory.

BAKU: Abdullah Gul: "Decision Of The Swedish Parliament Is Ineffecti

ABDULLAH GUL: "DECISION OF THE SWEDISH PARLIAMENT IS INEFFECTIVE"

APA
March 12 2010
Azerbaijan

Baku – APA. "We know how this decision was made. It is ineffective
from the point of our view", said Turkish president Abdullah Gul
making comments on the decision of Swedish parliament to recognize
"Armenian genocide".

According to APA, Gul said those, who made that decision, were not
historians. "I would like to reiterate what I said about the US
Congress. If you asked them about the event, they couldn’t be answer
even with three words. They are people, whose actions are based on
mostly wasted claims. This is very regrettable decision as disrespect
to the history. It has no effects. Don’t inflate that. This is no
such subject that could be inflated. We shouldn’t swell the issues
which are ineffective for us".

Unless Karabakh Is A Negotiating Party No Quick Settlement Is Possib

UNLESS KARABAKH IS A NEGOTIATING PARTY NO QUICK SETTLEMENT IS POSSIBLE: GULYAN

Tert.am
16:59 ~U 12.03.10

Ashot Gulyan, the chair of the National Assembly of the Republic of
Nagorno Karabakh (NKR), held a meeting with the OSCE Parliamentary
Assembly President Joao Soares at NKR’s permanent representatation
residence in Yerevan.

Gulyan told journalists after the meeting that they discussed
issues relating to NKR’s domestic and foreign policy, as well as the
settlement process.

"There is no news [on the process], as it is several years since
the same approach is being presented during meetings, [and that is]
announced by high-ranking officials from NKR and the Republic of
Armenia," said Gulyan, adding that he had mentioned at the meeting
that the settlement of this conflict would be possible only if Karabakh
has a seat at the negotiating table and presented its approach.

"As far as Karabakh’s participation [in the negotiations] is not
secured, the conflict will not be resolved at a quick pace," said
Gulyan, adding that a quick settlement of any conflict increases the
probability of making mistakes.

Asked why this meeting took place in Armenia and not in
Nagorno-Karabakh, Gulyan said that Soares had a tight schedule,
adding he would next time visit Stepanakert to personally see what
the situation is like there.

"I did not see any attempts to exert pressure [on me] or dictate [my]
views. On the contrary, I felt he was willing to receive unbiased
information," said Gulyan.

Serzh Sargsyan Meets With Chairman Of French Senate Gerard Larche An

SERZH SARGSYAN MEETS WITH CHAIRMAN OF FRENCH SENATE GERARD LARCHE AND NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEAKER BERNARD AKOIE IN PARIS

Noyan Tapan
March 11, 2010

PARIS, MARCH 11, NOYAN TAPAN. RA President Serzh Sargsyan within the
framework of his official visit to France met with Chairman of the
French Senate Gerard Larche on March 10.

S. Sargsyan emphasized the special role of the two countries’
parliaments in further deepening of Armenian-French traditional
friendly and warm relations. He highly assessed the activity of the
Senate France-Armenia deputy friendship group and current level of
cooperation at interparliamentary structures, attached importance
to periodical mutual visits and contacts of Armenian and French
parliamentarians. J. Larche, in his turn, confirmed Senate’s readiness
to contribute to further deepening of Armenia-France friendship.

At the request of the French Senate Chairman S. Sargsyan presented
Armenia’s approaches over the Nagorno Karabakh settlement negotiations
process, regional problems and prospects of normalization of
Armenia-Turkey relations. Other issues of bilateral interest were
also touched upon.

According to RA President’s Press Office, S. Sargsyan met with French
National Assembly Speaker Bernard Akoie in Paris. S. Sargsyan highly
assessing the active work of members of the France-Armenia deputy
friendship group warmly emphasized the considerable contribution
of group’s former and current Chairmen Francois Rochbluan and Rene
Rouquet in strengthening of Armenia-France friendship, in unbiassed
approach shown by group members in issues pivotal for the Armenian
people. Thoughts were also exchanged over regional issues, prospects
of pushing forward Armenia-France friendly relations.

At the end of his official visit to France S. Sargsyan had a working
supper with a number of influential representatives of the French
Armenian community in Paris.

RA President’s delegation will leave Paris for Yerevan on March 11.