Toxic Chemical-Examination Expert to be Interrogated By Court

EXPERT WHO CARRIED OUT TOXIC-CHEMICAL EXAMINATION TO BE INTERROGATED
AT COURT OF APPEALS FOR LAVRENTI KIRAKOSSIAN’S CASE

YEREVAN, July 26 (Noyan Tapan). Expert Svetlana Minassian, who has
submitted the conclusion of toxic-chemical examination, will be
interrogated at the Court of Appeals August 2 as witness to the case
on Lavrenti Kirakossian, Head of the National Democratic Union (NDU)
Baghramian structure. The Court of Appeals on Criminal and Military
Cases chaired over by Judge Sevak Hambardzumian made such a decision
July 26 thus satisfying the petition filed by the Counsel for
Defence. Vardan Zournachian, Lawyer of the defendant, stated the
expert did not answer two of the inspector’s three questions related
to the age of the used drugs and its quantity at the moment it was
discovered. The conclusion does not include either the reasons for not
answering the aforementioned questions, which, the lawyer believes,
creates doubt. Whereas those questions, Vardan Zournachian said, are
of principal importance, since if the date of the use would appear to
be within the ten-day term of administrative arrest, that would have
proven his client’s innnocence. Prosecutor Koryun Piloyan, in his
turn, stressed Kirakossian is accused of keeping drugs at home rather
than of using them. The expert’s proof, he put it, is not the “queen
of the proofs” at all, but just one of them. We would remind you that
the lower court of the Armavir region recognized Lavrenti Kirakossian
guilty of large-scale drug trafficking and sentenced him to 18 months’
imprisonment. Kirakossian and his lawyer refused to admit the charges
stating facts have been doctored for political purposes and the 59.3
grams of drugs which the search found out at his home appeared there
“with the help” of the policemen.

Turkey to scrap four army brigades — newspaper

Reuters
July 23 2004

Turkey to scrap four army brigades — newspaper
23 Jul 2004 13:24:08 GMT

ANKARA, July 23 (Reuters) – Turkey’s military General Staff plans to
abolish four brigades, cutting the size of NATO’s second biggest army
by 18,000 in a drive to improve efficiency and flexibility, the
Referans daily said on Friday.

Those to be scrapped are the 33rd armoured brigade near the Bulgarian
and Greek borders, the 7th mechanised brigade on the Armenian border,
the 10th infantry brigade on the Iranian border and the ninth
armoured division in central Anatolia, it said.

The report said the General Staff also aimed to scrap its Aegean army
next year in a move seen as underlining much-improved ties with
Greece, a NATO ally but traditional rival with which Turkey almost
went to war as recently as 1996.

The General Staff declined to comment on the report.

The cuts could save cash-strapped Turkey about 65 trillion Turkish
lira ($44.29 million), the report said, adding that they had been
authorised by the head of the General Staff, General Hilmi Ozkok.

The report, written by Lale Sariibrahimoglu, who is also Turkey
correspondent for the respected British-based Jane’s Defence Weekly,
said Ozkok had initially intended a more radical shakeup, slashing
the land forces from 400,000 to 280,000. Turkey’s Defence Ministry
statistics show Turkey’s defence budget for 2004 stood at 9,880
trillion lira, about 3.4 percent of gross national product (GNP).

But these figures do not include substantial extra-budgetary funds,
for example, an estimated 2,400 trillion lira allocated to the
gendarmerie, or military police, and the coast guard.

Under reforms sought by the European Union, which Turkey aims to
join, Turkey recently agreed to allow full parliamentary scrutiny of
all future military spending.

The armed forces have a special place in Turkish society and see
themselves as the ultimate guardian of the country’s secular
democracy, but they are having to accept a big reduction in their
political influence as Turkey moves closer to the EU.

Turkey has a total of 800,200 people serving in its armed forces, the
bulk of them conscripts, making it second in size only to the United
States in the 26-nation NATO alliance. ($1=1467500 Turkish Lira)

Gazprom May Sponsor Iran-Armenia Pipeline Construction

MOSNEWS, Russia
July 21 2004

Gazprom May Sponsor Iran-Armenia Pipeline Construction

Russian natural gas monopoly Gazprom may sponsor the construction of
a gas pipeline from Iran to Armenia, said Alexander Ryazanov, Deputy
Chairman of Gazprom’s Board, quoted by Itar-Tass news agency.

The project’s cost is estimated to equal to $140 million. According
to Gazprom’s calculations, the project will pay for itself in nine
years. The total length of the gas pipeline is 141 kilometers (88
miles), with 41 kilometers passing through Armenia’s territory and
100 kilometers being built on Iran’s territory. The annual volume of
gas deliveries to Armenia will be 36 billion cubic meters of gas. The
gas pipeline is being constructed solely to satisfy Armenia’s
domestic demand for natural gas.

Ryazanov conceded that the Russian monopoly may pay for the
construction of the pipeline, although the company is somewhat
`pressed for money’.

=?UNKNOWN?Q?D=E9veloppement?= Candidature turque =?UNKNOWN?B?4A==?=l

Schweizerische Depeschenagentur AG (SDA)
SDA – Service de base francais
20 juillet 2004

Développement Candidature turque à l’UE Jacques Chirac confirme son
soutien à Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Paris (ats/afp/reuters) Le président français Jacques Chirac a
confirmé mardi son soutien à la candidature d’Ankara à l’UE en
recevant le Premier ministre turc Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Il a jugé
l’adhésion “souhaitable” “dès qu’elle sera possible”.

Le président français a souligné que “la Turquie avait fait des
progrès considérables, et qu’elle doit poursuivre et intensifier la
mise en oeuvre des réformes démocratiques et économiques”.

Peu avant son déjeuner avec Jacques Chirac, M. Erdogan avait jugé
“impensable” que la Turquie et la France soient en désaccord
politique, étant donné la vigueur de leurs liens historiques et
économiques.

“Irréversible”

M. Chirac s’est déclaré à de nombreuses reprises et sans ambiguïté en
faveur d’une adhésion alors que son propre parti, l’UMP (Union pour
un mouvement populaire) y est opposé ainsi qu’une grande partie de
l’opinion française.

Lors du sommet de l’OTAN à Istanbul le 29 juin, M. Chirac a qualifié
ce processus d'”irréversible”, tout en rappelant que cela se ferait
sur les bases des conclusions du rapport la Commission européenne,
attendu en octobre.

C’est en effet à partir de ce document que les pays de l’UE
décideront, lors du conseil européen du 17 décembre prochain,
d’ouvrir ou non des négociations pour l’adhésion de la Turquie. De
source diplomatique, on estime que l’entrée de la Turquie dans l’UE
ne se fera pas avant une dizaine d’années au moins.

Au deuxième jour de son séjour à Paris, M. Erdogan a malgré tout
obtenu un appui de poids dans sa campagne pour promouvoir la
candidature d’Ankara.

Achat d’avions

Paris et Ankara ont fait avancer parallèlement un autre dossier
important, celui de l’achat éventuel d’avions Airbus par la compagnie
nationale turque Turkish Airlines pour le renouvellement de sa
flotte. Ces discussions “sont en cours de finalisation”, a précisé la
présidence française à l’issue de l’entretien Chirac-Erdogan.

Le consortium aéronautique européen Airbus et l’américain Boeing
devraient en principe se partager ce contrat de deux milliards de
dollars.

M. Erdogan a aussi appelé les milieux d’affaires français qu’il a
rencontrés mardi au siège du Medef (patronat français) à l’épauler et
à investir dans son pays. La France est le deuxième partenaire
commercial de la Turquie et son quatrième fournisseur.

Doutes regrettables

M. Erdogan devait également rencontrer mardi les députés de la
Commission des Affaires étrangères de l’Assemblée nationale puis le
président sortant de l’UMP, Alain Juppé. Il a regretté la persistance
de doutes, de réserves ou de débat sur l’adhésion: “Le fait que ces
débats continuent à exister malgré le paquet de réformes qui a été
accompli, cela nous attriste”, a-t-il dit.

L’opposition de gauche française est pour sa part favorable à
l’adhésion. Le Parti socialiste exige toutefois en préalable la
reconnaissance du génocide arménien de 1915.

Le premier ministre turc s’est montré très clair à ce sujet. Selon
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, la question arménienne ne figure pas dans les
critères d’adhésion à l’UE. Elle doit être laissée aux historiens,
a-t-il affirmé devant la presse.

La communauté arménienne de France (450 000 personnes) est la plus
importante après celle des Etats-Unis. Elle avait appelé à manifester
à Paris mardi soir.

NOTE: dépêche actualisée. Avant-dernier paragraphe nouveau.

BAKU: Aliyev vows to liberate occupied territories at any cost

Azeri leader vows to liberate Armenian-occupied territories at any cost

Turan news agency, Baku
20 Jul 04

QUBA

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, who is visiting the town of Quba
(170km north of Baku), talked to local residents, listened to their
complaints and took their written messages today.

Speaking about the recent rise in minimum wages, Aliyev said that the
government would continue taking social security measures in the
interests of the population. He also pointed to the implementation of
regional development programmes and the creation of new jobs.

The head of state touched on the issue of army build-up as
well. According to him, additional funds have been allocated to that
end. With regard to the Karabakh theme, Aliyev said that Azerbaijan
would liberate its occupied territories at any cost.

Municipal election campaign starts in Nagorno Karabakh Republic

Municipal election campaign starts in Karabakh

Arminfo, Yerevan
20 Jul 04

STEPANAKERT

The electioneering of candidates for municipality heads started in the
Nagornyy Karabakh Republic [NKR] on 20 July. Eight people are
contending for the post of the NKR capital’s mayor.

[Passage omitted: a mayoral candidate regrets that there is no law on
the status of the capital]

The electioneering will last until 7 August.

Leading Expert Traces Rise of Skinhead Movement

Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press
July 14, 2004

Leading Expert Traces Rise of Skinhead Movement

TARASOV ATTRIBUTES INCREASE IN EXTREMIST VIOLENCE TO POST-SOVIET
COLLAPSE OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SCHOOLS; LOSS OF RECREATIONAL
OPPORTUNITIES LEFT YOUTH VULNERABLE TO ‘POLITICALLY CRIMINAL’
IDEOLOGIES, WESTERN NEOFASCISTS; TOTAL MEMBERSHIP IS AROUND 50,000
AND RISING

SOURCE: THE SKINHEADS ARE COMING. By Aleksandr Tarasov. Russky
kuryer, June 18, 2004, pp. 1, 12-13. Condensed text:

About the Author. (By Georgy Tselms). — For 10 years now, Aleksandr
Tarasov has been researching a phenomenon that is new to Russia:
skinheads, or “skins.” Our country very likely has no greater expert
on that topic. Tarasov’s interest in youth movements that are not
officially sponsored is no accident. In 1975, as a 17-year-old
freshman in the philosophy department at Leningrad State University,
he started an underground youth organization of the “new left” type.
Its members dreamed of social justice; their idols were Camus, Sartre
and Marcuse. The KGB saw the young fighters for justice as a danger
to the Soviet system. They were all arrested. Then everything
followed the usual course: jail, the Serbsky Institute [for
psychiatric evaluation — Trans.], then a special psychiatric
hospital. After that, Tarasov worked as a watchman and continued his
interest in the underground. He eventually managed to complete his
university studies. And with the onset of the new era, Tarasov took a
job at the independent Panorama Center, where he specialized in
problems relating to political extremism. He has studied skinheads
not just from the literature, but also through “direct observation”:
He has been in contact with them, attended their gatherings, etc.
Today Tarasov is in possession of unique material that is absolutely
indispensable to our law-enforcement agencies if they intend to
combat the brownshirt plague in Russia. If they intend to.

* * *

. . . The catastrophic economic slump beginning in 1991 left
millions of people in Russia unemployed. In addition, the educational
system broke down. In recent years, 400 to 450 schools closed
annually for financial reasons, and a correspondingly large
percentage of students at those schools were denied the possibility
of continuing their education. As early as 1997 in Siberia, for
example, between 7% and 11% of draftees were illiterate, according to
official data from military registration and enlistment offices, and
in the spring of 1999, every third lawbreaker of school age had not
completed even an elementary education! Young people were reverting
to a wild state en masse. Crime, alcoholism and drug abuse swept
across the country, especially among the young.

Kids simply had no place to go. “Houses of culture” and the like
had been bought up by “new Russians” and converted to night clubs,
casinos and restaurants. Children’s clubs had perished. Schoolkids
were left to their own devices after school, and by and large, they
became prey for criminal elements and drug traffickers. . . .

The younger generation became an ideal target for the absorption of
all sorts of primitive ideologies based on violence and individualism
— both just plain criminal and politically criminal (xenophobic,
racist and anti-Semitic). Initially, Russian skinheads had no
systematic ideology. They were gut-level racists, xenophobes, machos,
militarists and anti-intellectuals. But the constant propaganda
conducted in the skinhead community by extreme right-wing parties has
caused the skins to become increasingly conscious fascists,
anticommunists, Russian Orthodox fundamentalists and anti-Semites. .
. .

Russism — a rather exotic radical-right ideology — has become
widespread among skinheads. Despite its constantly underscored
devotion to Russian Orthodoxy, Russism takes a rather indulgent view
of Aryan paganism (in the spirit of national socialism), since “race
comes before faith” and “blood unites, while religion separates.”
Russism builds a bridge from prerevolutionary Russian Orthodox
monarchism to national socialism: According to the canons of Russism,
there were two great Aryan heroes in the 20th century — Nicholas II
and Adolf Hitler. . . .

It is a noteworthy fact that in Russia, of the three main currents
in the world skinhead movement — Nazi skins, “Red skins” and “trads”
— only the first is widespread in Russia, whereas in many countries
the majority of skinheads are in fact “trads” (i.e., “traditional
skinheads,” apolitical young people who adopt the skinhead subculture
strictly because it’s cool). . . .

In clothing, the skins copy their kindred spirits in the West. . .
.

Our first skinheads were predominantly adolescents between the ages
of 13 and 19 who were in public schools, vocational-technical schools
or technical colleges, or were unemployed. But over time, the
situation has changed. A skin’s paraphernalia alone (the “right”
boots, trousers, bomber jacket, insignia patches, “Celtic” tattoos,
etc.) costs quite a lot of money — roughly 15,000 rubles. Poor kids
simply don’t have that kind of money. Today’s skinhead frequently
owns both a handheld computer and a cell phone. The skinheads are
united in small groups (three to 10 people) that are basically
mini-gangs. Their average term of existence is a few years. But there
are also larger and more structured groups. The first to appear in
Moscow were Skinlegion and Blood & Honor (B & H) — Russian
Affiliate. B & H is an international organization of Nazi skins that
has been officially banned in some countries as extremist or fascist.
B & H — Russian Affiliate and Skinlegion each had 200 to 250 members
and were characterized by a certain level of discipline, a hierarchy,
and a division of labor. In 1998 they were joined by a third large
organization — United Brigades 88. . . . Later on came the
Hammerskin Nation group (Hammerskins), which considers itself a
division of the international skinhead organization of the same name.

Skinhead gangs first arose in our major and most highly developed
cities, where the social stratification that has developed in Russia
in recent years is especially visible. Today, however, a “second
wave” of skins has swept through small provincial towns as well.

No one did anything to fight the skins. While the OMON special
police were “dealing with” people from the Caucasus, the skins, being
weaker and more cowardly, chose as their victims people from Central
Asia or the third world — particularly “blacks” and “slant-eyes.” A
certain amount of variety could be seen from city to city.
Historically, Moscow, St. Petersburg and Nizhny Novgorod were the
centers of the skinhead movement in Russia. In Moscow, the skins
attacked mainly Africans and Indians; in St. Petersburg — Africans,
Nepalese and Chinese; and in Nizhny Novgorod — people from Central
Asia (primarily refugees from Tajikistan).

The police took a tolerant attitude toward the skins. . . . In that
atmosphere of tolerance, the skinhead movement grew to its present,
quite impressive size. The number of skinheads in Russia is now close
to 50,000. There are currently somewhere between 5,000 and 5,500
skinheads, according to various estimates, in Moscow and the nearby
parts of Moscow Province; about 3,000 in St. Petersburg and vicinity;
more than 2,500 in Nizhny Novgorod; more than 1,500 in Rostov-on-Don;
over 1,000 each in Pskov, Kaliningrad, Yekaterinburg and Krasnodar;
and several hundred each in Voronezh, Samara, Saratov, Krasnoyarsk,
Irkutsk, Omsk, Tomsk, Vladivostok, Ryazan and Petrozavodsk. It should
be recalled that in 1992, there were about a dozen skins in Moscow
and maybe five in St. Petersburg. All told, skinhead communities now
exist in approximately 85 cities.

Many radical right-wing, nationalist parties and organizations
regard skinheads as their ready reserve and “social base.” In Moscow,
the Russian National Socialist Party (RNSP; until 1998 the Russian
National Union, or RNU) is considered to have pioneered work with
skins.

In St. Petersburg, it’s the Freedom Party (until 2000 the National
Republican Party of Russia, NRPR) that works with skins. In the
cities of the Volga region and in Krasnodar, it’s Russian National
Unity (RNU) and Russian Guards (a splinter group of RNU).

It’s interesting that the majority of our ultrarightists began
working with skins only after receiving instructions from their
Western “colleagues.” Beginning in 1997, representatives of
neofascist groups visited Russia repeatedly from the US, Germany, the
Czech Republic and Austria and “shared their experience” in working
with skinhead youth. . . . There are no visa restrictions to bar
fascist emissaries.

In most cities in Russia, skinheads feel self-assured and
unthreatened. The police and the authorities are clearly sympathetic
toward them. Choi Yun Shik, president of the South Korean Student
Association, who is studying in Moscow, and Gabriel Kotchofa,
president of the Moscow Foreign Students Association, both assert
that the Moscow police have refused hundreds of times to allow
foreign students who have been victimized by skins to file criminal
charges. Col. Mikhail Kirilin of the Federal Security Service’s [FSB]
public relations center and Vladimir Vershkov of the Chief Internal
Affairs Administration’s press service both told to a reporter from
the Moscow Times that their agencies do not regard skins as
constituting a danger. . . .

A certain amount of information has now accumulated to the effect
that Nazi skins are being encouraged, organized and used by Russia’s
ruling circles for their own purposes. There was considerable
evidence earlier that Nazi skins enjoyed the protection of regional
authorities (Krasnodar and Stavropol Territories, Pskov Province) and
especially of law-enforcement structures (Saratov, Voronezh, Nizhny
Novgorod, Volgograd, Samara). But in 2002 it was determined that Nazi
skins were training at a facility belonging to the Moscow OMON
special police, and that OMON trainers were doing the teaching. Such
training could not have taken place without the sanction of top
officials at the Ministry of Internal Affairs. . . .

In late 2000, amid demonstrative inaction on the part of the
authorities and silence on the part of the press, the skinheads
progressed to more serious, mass organized actions — to pogroms. The
first such attack took place on Oct. 21, 2000, in Moscow, at a
Vietnamese hostel near the Sokol subway station. Since the
authorities and the media did their best to suppress all mention of
the event, impunity inspired the skinheads to make their next move —
an attack on an Armenian school in Moscow (March 15, 2001). The
police did not detain a single troublemaker, confining themselves to
dispersing the skinheads. Despite protests from Moscow’s Armenian
community and from officials of the Republic of Armenia, the
authorities did their utmost to hush up the incident.

The next stage was the organization of a pogrom at the Yasenevo
market [see Current Digest, Vol. 53, No. 17, pp. 4-5.]. Since that
attack was unprecedented in scale, it proved impossible to keep it
quiet, and the incident was widely covered on TV and in the press. .
. . The next such attack, which began at a market near the Tsaritsyno
subway station [see Current Digest, Vol. 53, No. 45, pp. 1-6],
subsequently continued at several subway stations and in subway
trains and ended at the Sevastopol Hotel, which houses a large number
of refugees from Afghanistan. At least 300 skinheads took part in
that pogrom, more than 80 people were injured, 22 were hospitalized,
and four people (a Moscow Armenian, an Indian citizen, a citizen of
Tajikistan and an Afghan refugee) were killed. The events touched off
a major public outcry and were covered by all the media. The Moscow
authorities were forced to create a special department within the
Chief Internal Affairs Administration to combat extremism among young
people. The FSB refused to provide the new department with data on
skinheads, claiming that it had no information on that subject.

Despite the fact that 300 people had participated in the pogrom,
only five ended up in court. Three rank-and-file participants
(Rusakov, Polyakov and Trubin) were sentenced to three-year prison
terms. Klimanov, who had purchased the rebar [used as weapons], got
off with a suspended sentence. And finally, Mikhail Volkov, the
middleman between those who ordered the violence and those who
carried it out, got nine years. The trial did not determine who had
done the ordering. Volkov was declared to have been the organizer. In
January 2004, the Supreme Court reduced Volkov’s sentence from nine
years to five, concurring with the defense’s claim that Volkov’s
guilt as organizer of the pogrom had not been proven.

The Yasenevo and Tsaritsyno pogroms set an example to be emulated.
A whole string of others followed: on Prosveshcheniye Prospect in St.
Petersburg, in [Moscow’s] Old Arbat and in Kapotnya [also in Moscow]
(at a Vietnamese hostel). All those arrested were released, and the
police took to denying that ethnically motivated attacks were even
occurring. I have listed only those that caused the greatest stir.
Actually, a wave of ethnic violence swept across the entire country.

If at the beginning of the “second wave” (April 2002), the total
number of skinheads in Russia was approximately 35,000 to 40,000, by
the time it ends that number will probably be around 75,000 to 80,000
(after which the growth will stop). And since in Russia, unlike in
the West, no youth subculture ever disappears (including those that
have already faded out in the West, such as hippies and punks), one
can predict with confidence that the skinhead movement has taken root
among Russia’s young people for a long time to come.

BAKU: Azeri TV Blasts Russian Mediator’s Stance on NK Talks

AZERI TV BLASTS RUSSIAN MEDIATOR’S STANCE ON NAGORNYY KARABAKH TALKS

Space TV, Baku
15 Jul 04

Azerbaijan’s commercial Space TV has criticized the OSCE Minsk Group
for failing to offer a “specific and real set of proposals” on how to
resolve the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict with Armenia. It also described
as surprising Russian co-chairman of the group Yuriy Merzlyakov’s
“refusal to acknowledge the territorial integrity” of Azerbaijan. On
Nagornyy Karabakh’s participation in the talks, the TV station quoted
Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov as saying that this was
not envisaged by the mandate of the OSCE Minsk Group. The following is
the text of the report by Azerbaijani Space TV on 15 July; subheadings
inserted editorially:

(Presenter) The co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group arrived in Baku
today. They will be received by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev,
Foreign Affairs Minister Elmar Mammadyarov and other officials. The
co-chairmen say that the (Nagornyy Karabakh) problem has to be
resolved not by them but by the sides to the conflict. Russian
co-chairman Yuriy Merzlyakov said that the conditions are there for a
speedy resolution of the conflict and this opportunity must not be
wasted.

(Correspondent over video of Merzlyakov) Merzlyakov is unable to point
out the difference between Azerbaijan’s occupied territories and
Nagornyy Karabakh. When asked by journalists today about Armenia’s
withdrawal of its forces from Azerbaijan, Merzlyakov – true to form –
corrected the journalists.

(Merzlyakov in Russian) These are different things. We are talking
about the occupied territories and Nagornyy Karabakh where the
conflict is. You did not formulate it this way. You said the
withdrawal of the Armenian troops from Nagornyy Karabakh. This is not
the same as what you said later – the withdrawal of the Armenian
troops from Azerbaijan. These are different things.

(Correspondent) It is interesting that despite his diplomatic
expertise Merzlyakov did not hide that he was talking about his own
opinion rather than the official stance of the OSCE Minsk Group. At
any rate, no other explanation is possible for his refusal to
acknowledge the territorial integrity of the country he is
visiting. Moreover, despite repeated requests Merzlyakov did not say
which territories he meant when using the term the occupied
territories of Azerbaijan. For some reason, he said instead that he
was satisfied with the talks he has held with the leadership of
Armenia and the self-styled Nagornyy Karabakh Republic (NKR).

(Merzlyakov) I had a useful conversation with Arkadiy Gukasyan
(president of the NKR), Ashot Gulyanov (foreign minister of the
NKR). It was interesting to learn their opinion of the
negotiations. As for Armenia’s proposal – the objective of the
meetings with the Armenian leadership was to recount the evaluation by
the co-chairmen of how the negotiations are going. The talks are now
held on two levels – on the level of the two presidents and on the
level of foreign ministers who are now frequently consulting with the
co-chairmen. There have been three rounds of consultations.

Hence, our main objective was to recount our evaluation and we also
heard the views of high-ranking Armenian officials.

Merzlyakov dismisses Armenian media reports

(Correspondent) After making this at least surprising statement
concerning Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity, Merzlyakov went on to
make other remarks. He unequivocally dismissed reports by the Armenian
media which quoted him on Nagornyy Karabakh’s participation in the
talks as a side to the conflict. However, he said that he personally
considers this option acceptable.

(Merzlyakov) I have never concealed that in my opinion all the three
sides to the conflict have to take part in the talks. But if the two
sides have decided that this formula works for them, then I agree with
that.

(Correspondent) It seems that our remarks about the OSCE co-chairmen
coming into the region empty-handed were premature (as heard). Once
again the OSCE Minsk Group did not bring any specific and real set of
proposals to Baku, although the conflict has persisted for so many
years. Instead, they expect a ready-made recipe from the sides to the
conflict. This is strange because if the sides were able to find a
settlement on their own, then why would they need the Minsk Group?

The co-chairmen will stay in Baku until 17 July. By then they may
reach a consensus and answer this question on the basis of regional
security and international law.

Mammadyarov on Minsk Group’s mandate

(Presenter) Mammadyarov has said that the Minsk Group has to act
within the mandate given to it by the OSCE.

(Correspondent) The conflict will not be solved without Nagornyy
Karabakh’s participation in the talks, the Armenian media have
reported, quoting Merzlyakov. Mammadyarov has said that the Minsk
Group has to act within the mandate given to it by the OSCE and it
does not envisage Nagornyy Karabakh’s participation in the talks.

(Mammadyarov talking with journalists) The talks are being held
between Armenia and Azerbaijan. When the mandate was issued on 24
April 1992 it said that Azerbaijan and Armenia are sides to the
conflict. The Armenian and Azerbaijani communities (of Nagornyy
Karabakh) are the interested parties. We are working within this
framework.

(Correspondent) The talks have intensified in the last six months and
another meeting will be held in August, Mammadyarov said.

(Mammadyarov) Over the last six months there have been two meetings
between the presidents, and three meetings between ministers. Now the
co-chairmen are visiting the region and we plan another meeting in
August. We are working on that now. Probably, it will become clear
tomorrow where we will meet and what we will discuss.

ANCA: U.S. House Adopts Schiff Amendment on Armenian Genocide

Armenian National Committee of America
888 17th Street NW Suite 904
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Fax: (202) 775-5648
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet:

PRESS RELEASE
July 15, 2004
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918

U.S. HOUSE ADOPTS SCHIFF AMENDMENT ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

— Amendment to Foreign Operations Bill Prohibits Turkey from
using U.S. Foreign Aid to Lobby Against the Genocide Resolution

— Rep. Knollenberg’s Leadership Key to Maintaining Military
Aid Parity for Armenia and Azerbaijan, Securing $65 Million
for Armenia and $5 Milliion for Nagorno Karabagh

WASHINGTON, DC – In a powerful rebuke to the Turkish government’s
campaign of genocide denial, the House of Representatives this
evening adopted the Schiff Amendment, prohibiting the Turkish
government from using U.S. foreign assistance in its multi-million
dollar campaign to defeat legislation (H.Res.193) recognizing the
Armenian Genocide, reported the Armenian National Committee of
America (ANCA).

The amendment, introduced by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), was passed by
a voice vote and added to the fiscal year 2005 foreign aid bill
(H.R.4818). The foreign aid bill was later passed by a vote of 365
to 41.

In his remarks on the House floor introducing the measure, Rep.
Schiff told his colleagues that, “today I offer a simple amendment
that will honor the one and a half million Armenians who perished
in the Armenian Genocide of the 1915 and 1923. I consider this a
sacred obligation to ensure that the men, women, and children who
perished in the Armenian Genocide are not lost to history and that
this Congress not fund shameful efforts to deny that the Genocide
occurred.” Commenting after the vote, Rep. Schiff said, “We are
another step closer to silencing those who would deny the murder of
1.5 million Armenians,” adding that, “This amendment stands true to
the memory of the victims.”

“The passage of this amendment is a major victory,” said Armenian
Caucus Co-Chairman Frank Pallone, Jr. “It clearly sends a message
that the United States House of Representatives will not tolerate
Turkey’s lobbying against the recognition of the Armenian
Genocide.” In his remarks during consideration of the measure, the
New Jersey legislator stressed that “it is time for this body to
stop defending and funding a government that continues to deny its
own history, and refuses to break with the pattern of intolerance
established by past Turkish governments which dealt with minority
issues by committing genocide against Armenians, massacring and
driving Greeks from its shores, restricting the rights of
Christians to worship, and denying the existence of its Kurdish
citizens.”

“We want, first and foremost, to thank Congressman Schiff for his
tireless leadership in advancing this amendment, to recognize the
strong support of Armenian Caucus Co-Chairmen Frank Pallone and Joe
Knollenberg, and to note the pivotal role that Chairman Kolbe
played in helping this measure reach the House floor – where, as we
all saw this evening, it enjoyed overwhelming bi-partisan support,”
said ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian.

The Genocide Resolution, H.Res.193, reaffirms U.S. support for the
Genocide Convention and cites the importance of remembering past
crimes against humanity, including the Armenian Genocide,
Holocaust, Cambodian and Rwandan genocides, in an effort to stop
future atrocities. It faces intense opposition from the Turkish
government, which has enlisted the backing of the White House in
its efforts to block this measure from being scheduled for a vote
of the full House.

The Genocide Resolution was introduced, in the House, in April,
2003, by Representatives George Radanovich (R-CA), Adam Schiff (D-
CA), and Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-
NJ) and Joe Knollenberg (R-MI). Its Senate companion measure was
introduced, in June, 2003, by Senators John Ensign (R-NV) and Jon
Corzine (D-NJ). H.Res.193 was adopted unanimously by the House
Judiciary Committee last May. Support for the measure has been
widespread off of Capitol Hill as well, with a diverse coalition of
over 100 ethnic, religious, civil and human rights organizations
calling for its passage, including American Values, National
Organization of Women, Sons of Italy, NAACP, Union of Orthodox
Rabbis, and the National Council of La Raza.

—————————————————-
Rep. Knollenberg Leads Effort on Foreign Aid Issues:
—————————————— ———-

Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairman Joe Knollenberg, who
serves as a senior member of the House panel dealing with foreign
aid issues, rallied the support of his colleagues behind key pro-
Armenian provisions in the Foreign Operations bill. Foremost among
these was the successful effort to maintain parity in U.S. military
aid to Armenia and Azerbaijan. This February, the Administration’s
budget proposed breaking the parity agreement, struck in 2001
between the White House and the Congress, by allocating $8 million
in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) for Azerbaijan and only $2
million for Armenia. The foreign aid bill, adopted today by the
U.S. House, sets FMF levels for both nations at $5 million.

“We value the leadership and hard work by Congressman Knollenberg
in maintaining the principle of military aid parity in the face of
White House and Pentagon pressure to break an agreement that has,
for the past three years, contributed meaningfully to regional
stability in the Caucasus,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram
Hamparian.

The House Foreign Operations Subcommittee, which is chaired by
Arizona Republican Jim Kolbe, supported a hard earmark of $65
million in U.S. assistance to Armenia, and $5 million for Nagorno
Karabagh. The Bush Administration’s proposal had requested $62
million for Armenia and had not set any specific funding level for
Nagorno Karabagh. The Subcommittee’s decision, made against the
backdrop of decreasing aid levels to the former Soviet republics,
would effectively reduce U.S. assistance to Armenia by $10 million
from FY 2004 levels.

The full text of the Schiff Amendment is provided below:

Amendment to H.R. 4818, as reported offered by Mr. Schiff of
California

At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the
following:

PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES

SEC. 576 None of the funds made available in this Act may be used
by the Government of Turkey to engage in contravention of section
1913 of title 18, United States Code, relating to lobbying with
appropriated moneys, with respect to H. Res. 193, Reaffirming
support of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the
Crime of Genocide and anticipating the 15th anniversary of the
enactment of the Genocide Convention Implementation Act of 1987
(the Proxmire Act) on November 4, 2003

www.anca.org

ASBAREZ Online [07-13-2004]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
07/13/2004
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://

1. Possibility of Vacating Lands around Karabagh Empty Speculation Says Azeri
Analyst
2. Russian PM Says Russian Investment Opportunities in Armenia Expansive
3. UN Calls on Tbilisi, Tskhinvali to Practice Restraint
4. Tenth Hamazkayin Summer Forum Begins Activities in Lebanon

1. Possibility of Vacating Lands around Karabagh Empty Speculation Says Azeri
Analyst

BAKU (Yeni Musavat)–In an interview with Zerkalo newspaper, political analyst
Vafa Quluzada, who was formerly a national advisor to Azerbaijan said that
reports suggesting Armenians are preparing to vacate certain “occupied
territories” in and around Karabagh is nothing but empty speculation, and that
no such negotiations to that effect are underway.
He added that discussions on vacating certain districts has only taken place
in Azerbaijan, while Armenia has not undertaken preparations to leave the
territories.
Quluzada did say that Armenia might agree to vacate certain territories, but
only if Azerbaijan agreed to either allow Armenia to annex Mountainous
Karabagh
and the Lachin District, or recognize the independence of the Mountainous
Karabagh Republic.
Yeni Musavat reports that Quluzada is an experienced diplomat who has been
involved in the Karabagh talks for many years, and as “one of the most
competent people on the issue,” his statements accurately reflect the “real
situation around Mountainous Karabagh.”
Quluzada explains that as a result of the lack of progress in negotiations,
the Azeri government began “generating” news that some of Azerbaijan’s
occupied
districts may be freed. “For instance, there was a report that the Turkish,
Azerbaijani, and Armenian foreign ministers had recently reached a preliminary
agreement that Armenia would vacate seven Azerbaijani districts,” he explains,
“It wasn’t long, however, before this report proved to be off mark.” He said
that similar accounts emerge following each and every meeting between the
foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia–that the liberation of five or
six
districts has been discussed.
Quluzada emphasizes that the liberation of Azeri territories can be
realistically discussed only when Armenia is allowed to annex Mountainous
Karabagh, together with the Shushi and Lachin districts. “Only against this
backdrop can Armenia agree to negotiate the issue of leaving the other
territories.”
“The government propaganda machine, however, is trying to create the
impression that thanks to the ‘successful’ policy of [Azerbaijani President]
Ilham Aliyev, the situation is changing for the better and that the Armenians
are about to agree to vacate a number of districts.”
He calls the effort “primitive and futile technology” that has been
exhausted,
but has been redesigned to convince the public of Ilham Aliyev’s “successful
Karabagh policy.”

2. Russian PM Says Russian Investment Opportunities in Armenia Expansive

MOSCOW (Armenpress/RIA Novosti)–Bilateral issues tied to Russian
investment in
Armenia will soon be settled, reassured Russia’s Prime Minister Mikhail
Fradkov, talking about negotiations with Armenian counterpart Andranik
Markarian in Moscow.
“We have been co-operating successfully in the economic sector; trade
turnover
has grown 30% compared to last year, but we should take additional measures to
utilize remaining opportunities. Trade of $200 million is not the limit,”
Fradkov said during talks with Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Markarian on
Tuesday.
Fradkov noted that Russian and Armenian leaders have met frequently
throughout
the year. “Dialogue is constantly filled with new content.” For Markarian, the
visit is the first official one to Russia.
Russia has also expressed an interested in updating its military
technology in
Armenia. “Our military-technology partnership is gaining momentum. Russian
experts are training the Armenian military, and both parties are eager to
expand the relationship when Russia updates military equipment in Armenia with
spare parts,” Fradkov said.
The sides are also expected to prepare an energy cooperation agreement in the
coming days on production and export of fuel and power supplies.
On Tuesday, Fradkov and Markarian signed an education partnership agreement.

3. UN Calls on Tbilisi, Tskhinvali to Practice Restraint

UNITED NATIONS (Itar-Tass)–The United Nations called on Georgia and South
Ossetia to abstain from any moves that could escalate tension and trigger
provocations.
UN Secretary General Marie Okabe told Itar-Tass that the UN wants a peace
settlement and reduction of tensions in the region.
As for a possible UN peacekeeping role in South Ossetia, Okabe said the
international community is involved in peacekeeping operations in Abkhazia and
the UN Security Council has not considered the situation outside that region.
Sources at the UN Secretariat said they are closely watching the South
Ossetian situation, and are receiving regular reports from the UN Observer
Mission in Georgia.
Another source said the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE) has assumed the lead in peacekeeping efforts in South Ossetia.
Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili told a news briefing in London on
Tuesday that Georgia has no intention of triggering an armed conflict in South
Ossetia.
“It is very important for us to create a stable situation in the country to
draw major investments into the national economy,” Saakashvili told
journalists.
“Active steps to settle the South Ossetian conflict will be taken by the
Georgian side when such steps will cause minimal negative side effects, and
not
when some general decides to start a small war in Georgia to satisfy one’s
ambitions. At this point Tbilisi’s task should be to support the population of
the Tskhinvali district [South Ossetian capital] economically,” Saakashvili
said.
Saakashvili is in London meeting with British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

4. Tenth Hamazkayin Summer Forum Begins Activities in Lebanon

BEIRUT (Hamazkayin)–More than thirty students from around Argentina, Canada,
Iran, Switzerland, Syria, and the United States, gathered in Lebanon on July
12, to kick-off the 10th Hamazkayin Summer Forum.
The official opening took at the Hamakayin Lebanon’s Gomidas hall.
Speaking on
behalf of the organizing committee, Forum Board member Shoushig Arslanian
welcomed participants and introduced counselors and supervisors, along with
board members. Supervisor Serj Kalousdian detailed the program, expounding
certain points and items. The participants then introduced themselves.
The same afternoon, participants visited His Holiness Catholicos Aram I to
receive his blessing and message.
Forum participants will continue their activities in Lebanon until July 18,
and will then depart for Armenia to continue the program until July 31.
Students from Armenia, Georgia, Great Britain, and Mountainous Karabagh
Republic will be joining the group in Armenia.
Since its inception in 1995 the Hamazkayin Summer Forum has provided a
friendly and exciting environment for bright young Armenians. Students get the
chance to learn a great deal about Armenian culture, discover the sites and
sounds of the host country, and, most importantly, plant the seeds for
lifelong
friendships. Thought provoking lectures, trips to historic destinations, and
nights of dancing and entertainment are only some of the things the forum has
to offer. Past participants have called it “an experience of a lifetime.”
In addition to the meeting with His Holiness Catholicos Aram I, this year’s
forum highlights include visits to Khor Virab, Lake Sevan, Yeraplour, the
Armenian Manuscripts Museum (Madenataran), the Sarian and Parajanov Museums,
the Genocide Memorial Monument and Museum, and the St. Gregory the Illuminator
Cathedral. The forum lecture series this year features a diverse pool of
speakers, including Yerevan State University President Radik Mardirossian, art
historian and critic Shahen Khatchatrian, National Dance Academy
choreographers
Vanoush Khanamirian and Norayr Mehrabian and National Assembly Special
Committee for Foreign Relations’ Chairman Armen Rustamian.
The West Coast participants of the 2004 Hamazkayin Summer Forum are: Alida
Ararxian, Natalie Melissa Asik, Annie Babikian, Tamar Baldjian, Alex
Beylerian,
RJ Boyajian, Karin Cemcem, Arpi Chahenian, Noeme Chahenian, Alex Giragosian,
Gabrielle Iagjian, Ari-Hovig Ishkhanian, Hovsep Kabaklian, Salpi Kabaklian,
Noushig-Siran Karpanian, Hrayr Khanjian, Laura Kurkjian, Lori Markarian, Sebu
Sabounjian, Sevag Simonian, Terenig Topjian, Annie Voskerchian, Armand
Yardemian and Armen Yemenidjian.

All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2004 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.

ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.

http://www.asbarez.com/&gt
HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ.COM
WWW.ASBAREZ.COM