BAKU: CIS official calls on Georgia for peace efforts in So. Ossetia

CIS official calls on Georgia for peace efforts in South Ossetia

ANS TV, Baku
11 Jul 04

Presenter CIS Executive Secretary Vladimir Rushaylo who has arrived in
Baku on a visit has declined to comment on the
Georgian-Ossetian-Russian conflict. Rushaylo, who was recently
appointed CIS executive secretary, is visiting CIS countries and
holding consultations.

Correspondent over video of Rushaylo and other Azerbaijani officials
During a two-day visit to Baku, CIS Executive Secretary Rushaylo will
hold consultations with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, Prime
Minister Artur Rasizada and Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov. He
said it is important to define the main directions of the CIS
countries’ activities and priorities. Before visiting Baku, the
delegation led by Rushaylo finished its work in Central Asia.

Passage omitted: Rushaylo’s meetings with Central Asian leaders

Rushaylo, who has arrived in Baku as CIS executive secretary for the
first time, answered questions about the Georgian-Ossetian-Russian
conflict at Heydar Aliyev airport. He said that conflicts could be
resolved only in a diplomatic way. According to him, it is more
expedient at the current stage that the Georgian leadership takes this
path. Rushaylo said that the region had many hotbeds of tension and he
did not want them to increase further.

Rushaylo speaking to microphone in Russian with Azerbaijani voice-over
I think we have enough post-conflict and conflict areas. I see no need
to create new trouble zones. Moreover, there are peacekeeping forces
and their work should be stepped up. For this reason, all sides to the
conflict should resolve the conflict politically.

Correspondent Asked about Russia’s interference in Georgia’s internal
affairs, Rushaylo declined to answer this question.

Rushaylo As an international official and Russian citizen, I will not
access Russia’s steps. I think this is not my authority.

Corespondent To recap, Rushaylo will go from Azerbaijan to Armenia and
then to Georgia.

Rasad Mammadov and Ramil Huseynov, ANS.

EU Commissioner Tours South Caucasus To Explain ‘New Neighborhood’

Monday,
05 July 2004
Caucasus: EU Commissioner Tours South Caucasus To Explain ‘New
Neighborhood’ Offer

Czech Republic World News Services
By Ahto Lobjakas

Janez Potocnik, a junior EU commissioner working with enlargement
commissioner Guenter Verheugen, today begins a four-day tour of the
South Caucasus. He will meet the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and
Georgia to talk about the EU’s recent decision to include the three
countries in its “new neighborhood” policy.

Brussels, 5 July 2004 (RFE/RL) — Janez Potocnik is a junior
commissioner. But he is by far the highest-ranking EU official to
tour the South Caucasus region in recent years.

As a commissioner for a new EU member state, Slovenia, Potocnik works
with the enlargement commissioner, Guenter Verheugen. Verheugen is in
charge of the EU’s “new neighborhood” program, which offers closer
ties to some EU neighbors.

Although not directly responsible for the new neighborhood program,
Potocnik fully represents the views of the European Commission.

He will spend this week traveling to Georgia (5-6 July), Azerbaijan
(6-7 July), and Armenia (7-8 July). Potocnik’s visit will emphasize
the EU’s renewed interest in those three countries. Following
Georgia’s “Rose Revolution” last year, the EU was quick to bring them
into the new neighborhood policy. The formal offer was finalized on 14
June.

Jean-Christophe Filori is a European Commission spokesman. He
explained to RFE/RL today what the offer will mean for the three
countries: “The next steps are to consider the possibility of setting
up a so-called action plan with those three countries — setting the
[reform] priorities they should address. And, on our side, offering
an approximation with the European Union. That, as you know, could
eventually — but in the longer term — lead very far toward a share
in the internal market, for instance, or [alignment] with several EU
policies, like environment or [energy and transport] networks.”

Filori said Potocnik will tell the three South Caucasus governments
that they could eventually have a voice in Europe.

Potocnik will not offer precise details of the financial aid likely to
accompany new neighborhood membership. EU member states are still
debating the contents of the bloc’s next budget for the years
2007-2013.

But EU officials say Potocnik will reiterate the bloc’s willingness to
take a more active approach to the region’s many conflicts. The bloc
will not act as a mediator. But it will use incentives inherent in
closer ties to foster compromise.

Filori says this strategy has proved successful elsewhere: “Take, for
instance, the example of Romania and Hungary, the issue of the
Hungarian minority. Through a very early and intense political
dialogue, we [found] a solution. And we really hope that with this
prospect of getting closer to the European Union we will also have the
possibility of a much better political dialogue with [the South
Caucasus] countries.”

The EU promotes its new neighborhood policy as distinct from bloc
membership but offering many of the same benefits.

Filori said the EU is not likely to discuss anytime soon a further EU
expansion that would bring countries like Georgia, Armenia and
Azerbaijan into the bloc: “We can never say never, of course — we
will have to see. What we’re trying to do now is to set the prospect
for the foreseeable future. And in the foreseeable future, we have an
approach allowing for much closer involvement of those countries in
Europe, and a much closer involvement of the EU in those countries —
much closer relations. It would be a first step. Let’s seize this
offer first.”

The EU has made it clear that it will consider developing relations
with the three countries on the basis of individual merit. So far,
Georgia has emerged as a clear leader.

Related Stories About Caucasus: EU Increasingly Targeting Georgia Over
Conflict-Stricken Armenia, Azerbaijan EU, Azerbaijan Discuss
Nagorno-Karabakh Does The Georgian-Russian Rapprochement Threaten
Chechens? European Parliament Rapporteur Sees Hope For
Nagorno-Karabakh Robust Nature Conservancy Blossoms In South

Other Articles Written By Ahto Lobjakas:

Summit Wrapup — Iraq, Afghanistan Are Subjects Of Alliance Agreements
Past Rifts Resurface As Both Sides Struggle To Build Ties Alliance
Chief Says Details Of Afghan Troop Increases To Be ‘Worked Out’ Summit
Agrees Training Program For Iraq Constitution Talks Deadlocked At
Brussels Summit Donors Conference Wins $1 Billion In Pledges Leaders
Meet To Finalize Constitution Talks International Donors Conference
Opens In Brussels EU Increasingly Targeting Georgia Over
Conflict-Stricken Armenia, Azerbaijan Foreign Ministers To Discuss
Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan

Students Ask for More Foreign Language Choices

Los Angeles Times
July 2, 2004

Students Ask for More Foreign Language Choices

By Erika Hayasaki, Times Staff Writer

Eighteen-year-old Victor Soltero grew up speaking Spanish at home. He
read books in Spanish by Pablo Neruda and Gabriel Garcia Marquez. But
at school, he wanted to learn a different language, like Italian or
French.

But at North Hollywood High School last year, those languages weren’t
options.

Spanish is the only foreign language offered to most teenagers at the
5,000-student campus, where 71% of students are Latino. Only 300
students, enrolled in the school’s highly gifted magnet program, have
the option of taking French.

The North Hollywood campus is one of two Los Angeles Unified School
District high schools that offer Spanish as the sole foreign language
for most students. Franklin High School in Highland Park, where 88% of
students are Latino, offers about 45 Spanish classes, but no other
foreign language.

Most L.A. Unified high schools offer French to all students. Some
offer German, Italian, Japanese, Korean or Mandarin, in addition to
Spanish. But principals at both North Hollywood and Franklin high
schools said there was not enough room or interest to add more
language programs on their campuses.

But Soltero said the interest exists – and about 200 other North
Hollywood students who wrote letters recently or signed a petition for
another language class option agreed with him. Some Franklin High
School students have also complained about the lack of options.

“Why are they limiting our choices?” said Soltero, who wants to travel
the world and meet people from different cultures. “I’m Mexican, and
it’s putting my race down. It’s like they’re saying, ‘You guys aren’t
smart enough to take anything else.’ ”

Many students and teachers said Latinos enrolled in Spanish classes
more frequently than others because they wanted to learn about their
culture or study a subject they already understand. Sometimes, they
expected it would be easier to get a good grade.

But other students said they wanted to challenge themselves by
learning a language different from that which their parents speak at
home.

Natalie Gonzales, a native Spanish speaker and 11th-grader, wrote a
letter to the administration that stated: “It is illogical to obligate
students who speak Spanish to sit in a room for an hour every day to
‘learn’ Spanish. Where is the challenge? The purpose of learning a
foreign language is to enlighten and motivate and elevate the soul,
and a large percentage of fluent Spanish speakers are robbed of this
experience.”

Non-Latino students have also complained, asking for more options.

North Hollywood senior Anca Giurgiulescu wrote: “How do you hope to
improve the performance of students attending North Hollywood High
School by limiting the availability of foreign language classes to
just one language? … If students are not allowed to choose from
challenging classes, how do you hope to inspire them to strive beyond
just the minimum requirements, or in other words, to strive beyond
mediocrity?”

North Hollywood Principal Randall Delling said there is no room for
another language class on his overcrowded campus. “My God, where would
we put it?” he said. “Every single room in this school is used every
single hour of the day.”

A few years ago, the campus offered French classes, but the former
principal closed the program because of a high dropout rate and
purported problems with the instructor. But the school’s Spanish
program, Delling said, is superior. The program has talented teachers
and Advanced Placement students who are mastering Spanish literature.

Delling said it was absurd to claim that his campus was discriminating
against Latinos by offering only Spanish.

“I’ve always said I would be willing to look at a French program, or a
German program or Armenian program. That’s fine,” he said. “But it’s
got to be a program that … students want to stay in. Yes, there are
students who want to take all these languages, but are they willing to
continue with the program, or will we end up with all of these classes
and no one in them?”

According to state data, most California campuses offer Spanish, along
with at least one other foreign language.

Arleen Burns, of the California Department of Education, said: “We do
realize there are often constraints such as resources. In the ideal
world we would be able to offer a variety of languages to every
student in California.” But she added that the situation at North
Hollywood and Franklin was rare.

Bud Jacobs, director of high school programs for L.A. Unified, said
the district encourages schools to add as many foreign language
programs as possible. But “foreign language teachers are hard to
find,” he said. “It’s an area that could probably use a lot more
attention.”

In overcrowded schools like North Hollywood, space for core curriculum
classes, such as math, science, social studies and English, take
precedence over foreign language classes because they are graduation
requirements, Jacobs said. Foreign language is not a requirement,
though most colleges and universities require two to three years of it
for admission.

Any Los Angeles high school students who want to take a foreign
language class that their campus does not offer can enroll
concurrently in a local community college to study it, Jacobs
said. That can be complicated, however, because it requires
rearranging schedules and finding transportation.

At Franklin High, Principal Sheridan Liechty said her campus had
offered French and Mandarin in the past, but that students were not
interested in those subjects.

“Most of our kids’ primary language is Spanish. They do beautifully on
AP Spanish exams,” she said. “If all of your students are selecting
Spanish, you can’t support hiring a French instructor.”

But at the overcrowded Belmont High School near downtown, where 89% of
students are Latino, there is always a demand for the school’s two
Mandarin and 16 French classes, as well as Spanish, said counselor
Lewis McCammon. French classes, he said, are packed.

“A lot of them think it’s a very strong academic subject,” he said.

Franklin High student Stephanie Vasquez, 17, said she would love to
take French.

“I went to Europe just this past March, and when I went to Paris,” she
said, “I wish we had a [French] class so I could have been prepared.”

The options, she said, limit students like her.

“I don’t think it’s fair,” she said. “Yeah, Highland Park is a
Spanish-speaking area. But [another language] makes you prosperous in
life. It looks better on your resume.”

Moscow expecting foreign Armenian minister

RIA Novosti
July 2, 2004

MOSCOW EXPECTING FOREIGN ARMENIAN MINISTER

MOSCOW, July 2 (RIA Novosti) – Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan
Oskanyan will pay an official visit to Russia on July 5 through 7, the
Information and Press department of the Russian Foreign Minister
reported Friday.

“The visit will take place in the context of Russia-Armenia political
dialogue, which is developing dynamically after high- and top-level
contacts of 2003-2004,” the Information and Press department said.

The Russian Foreign Ministry believes the visit will add momentum to
Russo-Armenian relations which have a solid legal base (the Agreement
on friendship, cooperation and mutual security dated December 29, 1991;
the Declaration on allied interaction with prospects for the 21st
century of September 26, 2000 as well as other 160 or more interstate,
intergovernmental and interdepartmental agreements).

A spokesman for the Russian Foreign Ministry said both Russian Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov and his Armenian counterpart Vardan Oskanyan
“will focus on coordination of joint efforts aimed at improvement of
the situation in the Caucasus, settlement of ongoing conflicts as well
as at an atmosphere of confidence necessary for the future
all-Caucasian cooperation.”

“A special emphasis will be made on the issue of Nagorny Karabakh. We
believe the parties to the conflict are to find an acceptable
compromise,” the Russian Foreign Ministry stressed.

“Russia is ready to contribute to the settlement of the issue of
Nagorny Karabakh and guarantee an agreement mutually acceptable for
both parties.”

“The Russian and the Armenian parties will consider the CIS
member-states’ interaction in the framework of the Collective Security
Treaty as well (Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan are parties to the treaty) and in the context of EurAsEC
(the parties are the same except Armenia, which has the status of an
observer),” the Information and Press department pointed out.

“Boosting Russian-Armenian trade and economic, cultural and
humanitarian cooperation will be one of the priority issues at the
talks,” the Russian Foreign Ministry reported.

The Information and Press department said the parties would discuss
fighting all manifestations of terrorism.

BAKU: CE Secretary General confirms Garabagh part of Azerbaijan

Azer News, Azerbaijan
July 1 2004

CE Secretary General confirms Garabagh part of Azerbaijan

The Council of Europe (CE) Political Committee held discussions on
Upper Garabagh on Thursday. Terry Davis, newly elected CE Secretary
General, presented a report on the issue. According to a member of
the CE Parliamentary Assembly representation in Azerbaijan Asim
Mollazada, who attended the meeting, Davis said in his statement that
Azerbaijani territories are under occupation and emphasized that
Azerbaijan is included into the United Nations (UN) together with
Upper Garabagh. In his speech at the Council of Europe on 23 June
Armenian President Kocharian maintained that “Garabagh has never been
part of independent Azerbaijan”.

He said that at the time of collapse of the Soviet Union two states
were allegedly formed: the Azerbaijani Republic on the territory of
the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic and the Republic of Upper
Garabagh on the territory of the Upper Garabagh Autonomous Region.
Mollazada said that the report presented by Davis disclosed
Kocharian’s attempt to deceive the Council of Europe and the entire
international community. Davis said talks on settling the conflict
are underway. He went on to say that the last elections in Azerbaijan
and Armenia led to a delay in the talks. He also spoke of the
activity of the OSCE Minsk Group. Speaking at the meeting, Mollazada
stated that the biggest obstacle to settling the Garabagh conflict is
Kocharian himself, as he is not interested in a settlement meeting
international legal norms. “The policy pursued by Armenia and
Kocharian is based on an aspiration to acquire legal and political
support for occupation”, he concluded. Davis’s written report on
Upper Garabagh is expected to be discussed at the CE Political
Committee on September 14. Although Davis will prepare the report
himself, it will most likely be presented by the Committee chairman
Yakich. The report will be discussed at the PACE January session.

Court threat
At a Friday meeting of the Milli Majlis (parliament) Azerbaijani MPs
reacted to Kocharian’s words. MP Mais Safarli called upon the
parliament not to remain indifferent to the Armenian President’s
speech at the Council of Europe. He proposed that an appeal be sent
to the international court to arraign Kocharian. Supporting Safarli’s
proposal, MP Jahangir Huseynov noted that it was necessary to adopt
the appeal by the end of the parliamentary session. Other MPs
stressed that an appeal to bring the Armenian president to court
should be sent not only to the international court and organizations
but also to those countries that support Armenia’s policy of
aggression. Speaker Murtuz Alasgarov underlined that there were
enough grounds to arraign Kocharian and said that appropriate legal
documents would be compiled for the purpose.

OSCE PA to discuss Garabagh conflict
Upper Garabagh will be on the agenda of the OSCE Parliamentary
Assembly (PA) session to open on July 4, Speaker of the Milli Majlis
(parliament) Murtuz Alasgarov told a Friday meeting of the
parliament. Eldar Ibrahimov and Sattar Safarov, members of the
Azerbaijani delegation at the OSCE PA, will attend the session.
Underlining that the Council of Europe has already recognized Armenia
as an aggressor, Alasgarov said that the OSCE, which is directly
involved in the settlement of the Upper Garabagh conflict, had not
yet adopted a relevant decision on the matter. The Speaker stressed
that it was high time to demand the OSCE pass decisions and
resolutions recognizing Armenia as an aggressor.

BAKU: Daily Blames Govm’t for change in Turkey’s stance on Armenia

Azeri daily blames government for change in Turkey’s stance on Armenia

Yeni Musavat, Baku
28 Jun 04

Turkey no longer puts forward the liberation of Azerbaijani lands as a
precondition for establishing ties with Armenia, the Azerbaijani
opposition daily Yeni Musavat has said. The Azerbaijani authorities
are to blame for this since they have failed to support Turkey in the
Cyprus issue, the daily reported. The following is an excerpt from
Konul Samilqizi’s report by Azerbaijani newspaper Yeni Musavat on 28
June headlined “Turkey responds to Ilham Aliyev’s betrayal”;
subheadings inserted editorially:

Ankara intends to establish ties with Armenia and no longer puts
forward the Karabakh issue as a precondition for that. Remarks of
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan give grounds to say so.

Responding to questions at the international conference “NATO at a new
turning point”, financed by the German Marshall Fund of the USA,
Erdogan said: “We do not want to sever ties with Armenia. We want to
preserve them. We have always wanted to remove obstacles and achieve
peace. We are trying to quickly resolve the grievances and conflicts
we have with our neighbours. However, if Armenia runs away we will go
after it only up to a certain point. We advise the following to
Armenia: should they continue with this ‘genocide’, then they will not
get a result. Leave this issue for historians. We are building the
future world. Otherwise, the future generations will not have a good
opinion of us.”

Erdogan said that what matters now is how the Armenian people live and
this should be taken into consideration. He even criticized Turkey’s
stance by saying that “Turkey did not have positive and good relations
with its neighbours for years”. He said that Turkey had suffered
economic losses as a result. Relations are improving now and trade is
on the increase, Erdogan said.

Karabakh no longer on agenda

It can be seen from Erdogan’s answer that the only main precondition
set for establishing ties with Armenia is that the Armenians drop
their fake “genocide” claims. This amounts to a step back in the
Turkish leadership’s position because until now Ankara cited
liberation of Azerbaijan’s lands occupied by Armenia among the main
preconditions. In effect, Turkey has now rejected the Karabakh
condition.

In the view of Qabil Huseynli, deputy chairman of the Musavat Party
and a political analyst, Azerbaijan never used to be on top of
conditions put forward by Turkey in exchange for improving relations
with Armenia. “This was only one of the demands. It is clear to
everyone that Turkey is first of all interested in resolving its own
problems and therefore demands that the fake ‘genocide’ claim be
dropped. Because this issue threatens Turkey’s foreign policy
interests. I personally have never believed that Turkey does not
establish relations with Armenia only because of the Karabakh
problem. This condition could have been a diplomatic move or maybe it
pursued propaganda objectives. Now it has been dropped completely.”

Huseynli said that this was caused by global processes and Turkey’s
role in them.

[Passage omitted: Turkey’s relations with the USA and the European
Union]

Cyprus vote

Obviously, Azerbaijan’s clan-based regime has played an important and
perhaps a crucial role in Turkey’s decision to drop the Karabakh
condition. Regardless of their propaganda and diplomatic objectives,
Turkish officials have been defending Azerbaijan’s interests over the
past several years.

The regime established in October 2004 in Azerbaijan – with assistance
from the Erdogan government – has taken many steps damaging the
strategic partnership with Turkey. It is enough to recall the
Azerbaijani government’s stance on the Cyprus issue to understand the
position of Turkey. Our attentive readers probably remember that the
clan’s MPs did not attend the PACE [Parliamentary Assembly of the
Council of Europe] vote on Cyprus. Commenting on this, the head of the
delegation, MP Samad Seyidov, openly said that this was a deliberate
political move – the deputies with ill-gotten mandates did not vote on
Cyprus because they thought about Karabakh.

[Passage omitted: Azerbaijan criticized by the Turkish press]

Greek president’s visit

Incidentally, we must note that during a press conference held jointly
with Greek President [Konstandinos Stefanopoulos], [Azerbaijani
President] Ilham Aliyev did not respond when a Greek journalist
described Turkey as an “invader”. What is more, Aliyev promised not
to recognize [the Turkish Republic of Northern] Cyprus. When one takes
into consideration this pledge to the Greeks and the non-participation
in the Cyprus vote, Erdogan’s remarks do not look surprising. Our
newspaper said in the wake of that press conference that Turkey will
not leave this betrayal unanswered. The response came faster than
expected and in an unforeseen form.

Scholarships Available to Diaspora Armenians to Attend Armenian

PRESS RELEASE
June 24, 2004
Embassy of the Republic of Armenia
2225 R Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20008
Tel: 202-319-1976, x. 348; Fax: 202-319-2982
Email: [email protected]; Web:

Scholarships Available to Diaspora Armenians to Attend Armenian Universities

The Government of Armenia has established 75 full scholarships to allow
Diaspora Armenians to study in the Armenian public universities and colleges
in the academic year 2004/2005. 70 scholarships will be provided to
applicants interested in pursuing undergraduate studies, and 5 scholarships,
for graduate studies.

Applications for scholarship and enrollment will be considered by a special
commission of the Armenian Ministry of Education and Science. Priority is
given to applicants pursuing studies in Teacher’s Training, Armenian
Studies, and Fine Arts.

In addition to tuition-free positions, Diaspora Armenian applicants will
also have an opportunity to apply for and be enrolled in public universities
on paid basis, following the procedure outlined above.

The deadline for submitting applications is August 20, 2004. The application
forms, list of universities and departments are available upon request from
the Embassy of Armenia, via email: [email protected] or telephone:
202-319-1976, ext. 348.

www.armeniaemb.org

Society Must Be Attentive To Them

SOCIETY MUST BE ATTENTIVE TO THEM

Azat Artsakh – Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
18 June 2004

In all countries there are orphanages which operate through the support
of the government and benefactors. The boarding school in Kashatagh has
been operating since 1996 and accommodates 30 children. In Kashatagh
there is one child from Stepanakert, two children were admitted to
the orphanages of Armenia. At the department of problems of family
and children under the Ministry of Social Security we learned that
there are 64 parentless children in the republic presently who are
mainly taken care of by their relatives and guardians. They receive
monthly state benefit of 3 thousand drams. According to the head of
the department Samvel Dadassian, parentless children also receive aid
from sponsors one of which is the German charity organization “Image
of Hope”. The organization provides food and clothes to parentless
children and single pensioners. The aid is given twice or three times
a year. Touching upon the aid provided by benefactors, S. Dadassian
also stated that for improving the material state and quality of life
of the parentless children in the republic the NKR Ministry of Social
security and “Karabakh Telecom” have worked out a joint program of
providing financial to children under 18 in 2004. “The program is
financed by Karabakh Telecom and once in three months these children
receive 10 thousand drams on the bank accounts in “Artsakhbank” opened
in the name of their guardians,” said S. Dadassian. The program will
be implemented up to January 1 of 2005. At the department of problems
of family and children we were informed that all the 64 children have
received their sum for the first trimester of 2004 and the payments
for the second trimester are currently made. Recently the government
of Armenia adopted a decision according to which the children who have
left the orphanage will be provided with flats. Speaking about the
housing conditions of parentless children living in our republic the
head of the department noticed that mainly living with their guardians
the children do not have the need for flats except for a family
(three children) who are homeless. Presently a survey is conducted
and in the future this problem will also possibly be solved. The
birth of a child is the beginning of a fairy tale. Unfortunately,
there are children for whom the fairy tale ends as soon as it starts.
Sometimes by fate and sometimes because of the careless attitude of
their parents a group of children today are parentless. The duty of
our state and the society is to do so that these children believe in
the existence of happy childhood.

ANAHIT DANIELIAN. 18-06-2004

$1 billion for Islam Karimov

Agency WPS
What the Papers Say. Part B (Russia)
June 17, 2004, Thursday

$1 BILLION FOR ISLAM KARIMOV

SOURCE: Vremya Novostei, June 17, 2004, p. 2

by Arkady Dubnov

President Vladimir Putin began his four-day Central Asian tour with a
working visit to Tashkent yesterday. Putin’s itinerary includes three
summits in a row. Today a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation
Organization (SCO) will take place in the capital of Uzbekistan,
attended by the leaders of Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Hamid Karzai, head of the interim
administration of Afghanistan, is invited to the summit as well.

The summit will adopt the Provision on Observer Status for the SCO,
and experts believe that Afghanistan will be given this status in the
near future. “We will discuss how we can help Afghanistan organize
elections, suppress anti-government actions, and restore its national
economy,” Putin said.

It is apparently too early yet to talk about what the SCO can do to
help the Afghanistan administration “suppress anti-government
actions.” Karzai is highly unlikely to appeal to members of the SCO
to send armed contingents. It is clear that this is the duty of the
US-led Western coalition. Karzai was in Washington the other day and
asked the coalition to boost its military presence in Afghanistan.

Astana will come after Tashkent. Summits of the Euro-Asian Economic
Community (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan)
and the CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization will take place
in the capital of Kazakhstan on June 17 and 18. President Robert
Kocharjan of Armenia will join other national leaders on June 18.

June 16 was Russian-Uzbek day in Tashkent. Two documents were signed:
a strategic partnership treaty between Russia and Uzbekistan, and a
production sharing agreement between the Russian-Uzbek consortium
headed by LUKoil and the government of Uzbekistan (the
Kandym-Khauzak-Shady gas project in Uzbekistan).

Sources in the Russian delegation say that the “strategic” treaty was
President Islam Karimov’s initiative. In other words, official Moscow
insists that it did not force itself on Tashkent as a partner, that
it was Tashkent that aspired for partnership.

Putin was extremely tactful yesterday. “President Karimov himself
participated in work on the treaty,” he said. “I never thought it
would be ready in so short a time.” It appears that this is a
framework treaty stipulating “facilitation of equal strategic
partnership” in political, military technology, economic, and
humanitarian spheres carried out on the basis of “appropriate
accords.”

One article of the treaty is particularly interesting. It states that
“signatories enable each other to use military facilities on their
territories on the basis of special accords.” It is hard to imagine
Uzbekistan in need of military bases on the territory of Russia.
Which means that it was Tashkent that pledged to enable Moscow to
make use of military facilities on the territory of Uzbekistan. This
alone may justify strategic nature of the Russian-Uzbek partnership
proclaimed in Tashkent yesterday. The remaining articles of the
treaty merely give definitions of close cooperation between the two
countries.

The agreement LUKoil President Vagit Alekperov signed in Tashkent
appears much more interesting. It means that the Russian oil company
is coming to Uzbekistan to stay – and handle natural gas there.
LUKoil will operate Uzbek gas deposits for the next 35 years,
investing up to $1 billion in them. Known gas resources on the
territory in question amount to almost 3,000 billion cubic meters,
and top annual production should reach 8.8 billion cubic meters. Gas
production is to begin in 2007.

LUKoil will sell its part of the gas to Gazprom. To accomplish that,
the company intends to build a part of a pipeline connecting the area
with the Central Asia – Center pipe running across Uzbekistan. The
Russian oil company views the Uzbek project as strategic because “it
stands for transformation of LUKoil into an oil and gas company,” to
quote Alekperov.

Putin emphasized yesterday that “it is not Russia that is investing
in Uzbekistan, it is Russian companies.” Karimov immediately parried
by saying that he as president guaranteed security of the
investments. It is common knowledge in fact that foreign companies
have a chance in Uzbekistan only with the Uzbek leader’s personal
guarantees.

BAKU: Azerbaijan-Canadian relations acquire new stage

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan State Info Agency
June 17 2004

AZERBAIJAN-CANADIAN RELATIONS ACQUIRE NEW STAGE
[June 17, 2004, 11:16:16]

On June 16, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan Republic Elmar
Mammadyarov has met the ambassador of Canada Michael Lire
re-appointed in Turkey and Azerbaijan.

As was informed to AzerTAj from the press center of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs, having thanked for warm reception, ambassador
Michael Lire has handed over minister Elmar Mammadyarov a copy of the
accrediting letter and has emphasized, that he would actively work in
the direction of development of relations between the two countries.

Minister Elmar Mammadyarov congratulated the ambassador with new
appointment has wished him successes in activity. Having noted, that
Azerbaijan attaches great importance to all-around development of
links with Canada, he has emphasized, that our countries possess
ample opportunities in many areas. Having informed the visitor that
in the near future in Toronto the embassy of Azerbaijan will be open,
the Minister has expressed a wish about fast opening in Baku
embassies of Canada. He has noted, that opening of embassies will
give a new pulse to communications between our countries.

Then, the head of foreign policy department has in detail told about
political, public and economic situation in Azerbaijan after gaining
independence, democratic reforms spent in the country, integration of
our republic into the European institutes, the obligations taken by
our country before the international organizations, and their
successful performance, has informed the ambassador on the position
of our republic in connection with the work done in the direction of
settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorny Karabakh conflict.

Having touched the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan, minister Elmar
Mammadyarov has informed the ambassador on participation of the
Azerbaijan peacemakers in the antiterrorist coalition.

At the meeting, also were focused a number of other questions
representing mutual interest.