Turkish FM Reveals Its True Face: Protocols Will Not Be Sent To Parl

TURKISH FM REVEALS ITS TRUE FACE: PROTOCOLS WILL NOT BE SENT TO PARLIAMENT BEFORE APRIL 24

news.am
March 5 2010
Armenia

Turkish Foreign Ministry expressed a hope that Resolution #252 on
recognition of Armenian genocide by U.S. House Committee on Foreign
Affairs will not be included on the agenda of the U.S. Congress
plenary session.

According to Turkish diplomatic sources, it is essential not to
submit Armenia-Turkey Protocols to Turkish Parliament before April 24,
Turkish Haber7 website reports.

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu will organize a press
conference following the adoption of Armenian Resolution. Earlier,
Turkish FM said Turkey will not make decisions under the pressure.

White House Presses To Stop Armenian Genocide Vote

WHITE HOUSE PRESSES TO STOP ARMENIAN GENOCIDE VOTE
By Desmond Butler

Associated Press
March 4, 2010

The Obama administration is urging a House panel not to offend Turkey
by declaring that the Ottoman-era killing of Armenians was genocide.

But the committee chairman pressed ahead Thursday.

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration is urging a House panel not to
offend Turkey by declaring that the Ottoman-era killing of Armenians
was genocide.

But the committee chairman pressed ahead Thursday.

The administration stepped in despite a campaign promise by President
Barack Obama to brand as genocide the killing of as many as 1.5
million Armenians by Ottoman Turks. The vote by the congressional
committee could alienate Turkey, which plays an important role for
U.S. interests in the Middle East and Afghanistan.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told House Foreign Affairs
Committee Chairman Howard Berman on Wednesday that such a vote would
jeopardize reconciliation talks between Turkey and Armenia, White
House spokesman Mike Hammer said.

Despite the call, Berman, D-Calif., on Thursday urged members of
the committee to approve the resolution, and they appeared likely to
endorse it. That would send it to the full House, where its prospects
are uncertain.

The United States relies on Turkey as a key supply route for U.S.

troops in Iraq and Turkey’s troops serve in the U.S.-led coalition
forces in Afghanistan. The United States also is pressing Turkey,
which holds a rotating seat in the U.N. Security Council, to support
sanctions against Iran, Turkey’s neighbor.

Even if the genocide measure doesn’t go beyond the committee, Turkey
has warned it could jeopardize U.S-Turkish cooperation and set back
negotiations aimed at opening the border between Turkey and Armenia.

The Foreign Affairs Committee approved a similar measure in 2007, but
it was not brought to the House floor for a vote following intensive
pressure by President George W. Bush.

Following the 2007 committee vote, Turkey promptly recalled its
ambassador, and U.S. officials feared the Turks might cut off American
access to a Turkish air base essential to operations in Iraq. After
intensive lobbying by top Bush administration officials, the resolution
was not considered by the full House.

On Thursday, a Turkish official suggested his country could again
recall its ambassador to the United States if the congressional panel
approves the resolution.

"All options are on the table," the government official said, speaking
on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu says the resolution could damage
Turkish-U.S. ties and undermine reconciliation efforts with Armenia.

"If it passes, then the Obama administration should try to prevent
it from being voted by Congress," Turkey’s state-run Anatolia news
agency quoted Davutoglu as saying Thursday during a visit to Egypt.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said she will wait to see the result
of the committee vote before deciding whether to bring it up for full
House vote.

Armenian American groups have for decades sought congressional
affirmation of the killings as genocide. Historians estimate that
up to 1.5 million Armenians were killed by Ottoman Turks around the
time of World War I, an event widely viewed by scholars as the first
genocide of the 20th century. Turkey says the toll has been inflated
and those killed were victims of civil war and unrest, not genocide.

In April, Obama broke a campaign promise to brand the killings
genocide in an annual White House statement on the day marking
Armenian remembrance. Obama said that while he had not changed his
personal views, he did not want to upset promising talks between
Turkey and Armenia on improving relations and opening their border,
sealed since 1993.

Associated Press writer Suzan Frazer contributed to this story from
Ankara, Turkey.

‘Issue Of Genocide Can’t Become A Subject For Dealing’

‘ISSUE OF GENOCIDE CAN’T BECOME A SUBJECT FOR DEALING’

Aysor
March 4 2010
Armenia

Arman Musinian, a spokesperson for the first-sitting Armenian president
and chairing leader of the oppositional Armenian National Congress
Levon Ter-Petrosian, said that there is little sign of US recognition
of Genocide of 1915, as the White House will hardly give away its
interests and security in the Middle East.

When asked whether Armenian National Congress will organise any
rallies if Congress calls off the Resolution on Genocide at today’s
Congressional Panel, Arman Musinian said: "Our position is that the
issue of Genocide was not included in the foreign policy’s agenda. We
are against that the issue of Genocide to be a measure for suppressing
the government and people. This is not moral."

The ‘saddest happening’ in the process of recognition of Genocide,
according to Arman Musinian, is that fact that Armenian side agreed
to form a joint historical commission, questioning the Genocide.

"In this situation I can’t say whether there are counties which will
recognize Genocide."

"Diaspora mainly contributes to the process of recognition of the
Genocide, and its role of the key part of the process was especially
active under administration of Levon Ter-Petrosian.

"Genocide is an issue of humanity. Turkey carried moral obligations
to whole humanity.

"However, when the issue of Genocide is a part of agenda of the
foreign policy, it turns into subject for speculations.

"Issue of Genocide can’t become a subject for dealing," he added.

Reuters: CEOs Warn Against Armenia "Genocide" Bill

CEOS WARN AGAINST ARMENIA "GENOCIDE" BILL
Andrea Shalal-Esa

Reuters
/idUSTRE62157G20100302
March 3 2010
UK

Tue Mar 2, 2010 6:19pm ESTWASHINGTON (Reuters) – The aerospace and
defense industry is urging House of Representatives lawmakers to
reject a measure that would call a World War One-era massacre of
Armenians by Turkish forces genocide, warning it could jeopardize
U.S. exports to Turkey.

Barack Obama

The chief executives of Lockheed Martin Corp, Boeing Co, Raytheon
Co, United Technologies Corp and Northrop Grumman Corp issued a rare
joint letter, warning that passage of the measure by the House Foreign
Affairs Committee could lead to "a rupture in U.S.-Turkey relations"
and put American jobs at risk.

"Alienating a significant NATO ally and trading partner would have
negative repercussions for U.S. geopolitical interests and efforts to
boost both exports and employments," the CEOs warned in a February
26 letter to the committee’s Democratic chairman, Representative
Howard Berman.

They said U.S. defense and aerospace exports to Turkey exceeded
$7 billion in 2009 and were seen reaching a similar level in 2010,
supporting tens of thousands of U.S. jobs.

Industry executives are worried about Turkey’s continued participation
in several big U.S. weapons programs, including the Lockheed F-35
fighter, a $1.2 billion deal with Boeing for 14 CH-47 Chinook
helicopters, and Patriot missile sales.

Turkey is one of eight international partners working with the United
States on development of the $300 billion F-35 fighter, a program
that has already seen some erosion of overseas amid cost overruns
and delays in critical testing.

"Turkey is clearly one of the critical partners on the F-35 program
and one that is buying a lot of airplanes early in the program, so it
would have a corrosive effect if they pulled out," said Jim McAleese,
a Virginia-based defense consultant. "It would set the stage for other
allies to reevaluate their schedule or even the overall quantity of
F-35 purchases."

The nonbinding resolution, to be voted on Thursday by the House panel,
would require President Barack Obama to ensure that U.S. policy
formally refers to the massacre as "genocide" and to use that term
when he delivers his annual message on the issue in April — something
Obama avoided doing last year.

The Aerospace Industries Association, which represents more than 270
member companies, expressed concern in a separate letter, noting that
U.S. exports to Turkey had more that tripled to over $10 billion
in 2008, and U.S. companies were pursuing further arms sales at
the moment.

"In this current economy, we cannot afford to turn our back on
increasing U.S. exports and sustaining U.S. jobs by alienating one of
our most important trading partners," said Marion Blakey, president
of AIA, the largest U.S. trade group.

Turkey on Monday warned its ties with the United States would be
damaged if the House panel approved the measure.

One industry executive, who was not authorized to speak on the record,
said U.S. companies fear Turkey could back out of deals with them
and buy weapons form European firms instead.

http://www.reuters.com/article

Erdogan Scheduled For Critical Visit To US

ERDOGAN SCHEDULED FOR CRITICAL VISIT TO US

Hurriyet
March 2 2010
Turkey

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan will attend a nuclear security
summit in the United States, hosted by President Barack Obama.

However, because the visit is on April 11, the trip is likely to be
dominated by the lead-up to April 24, the day Armenians commemorate
what they term the World War I-era killings of Ottoman Armenians
as genocide While Turkey’s prime minister ostensibly travels to the
United States for a meeting on nuclear security in April, the visit
is likely to be overshadowed by the run-up to April 24, a day of
critical importance to Armenians.

Although Turkey widely expects a House of Representatives Foreign
Affairs Committee to endorse a resolution calling the 1915 killings of
Armenians as genocide during a Thursday vote, officials and experts
both seem quietly confident the U.S. administration will intervene
to prevent the resolution’s adoption during a full House vote.

"The U.S. will act according to its strategic interests. And at this
stage it needs Turkey in the Middle East as well as South East Asia,"
said Professor Hasan Köni of Ä°stanbul’s BahceÅ~_ehir University.

"It would not be a surprise if the resolution passes the panel’s vote.

But, in the long run, President [Barack] Obama will step in to block
its final adoption. In the past the administration stepped in for
strategic reasons. Today, the U.S. has more at stake than ever. It
needs Turkey on Iraq, on Afghanistan and on Iran," said Mustafa Aydın,
rector of Istanbul’s Kadir Has University.

Government officials also believe the resolution will ultimately not
pass, yet are prepared for an extremely tense period because pressure
will mount on Turkey to proceed with a parliamentary ratification of
normalization protocols with Armenia.

The U.S. will do its utmost to exert pressure on Turkey and increase
tension until the last minute to convince the ruling Justice and
Development Party, or AKP, for a parliamentary vote on the protocols,
according to a Turkish official familiar with the issue.

"One of the reason for the current deadlock is the prime minister’s
pledge to Azerbaijan during a visit last May, [in which he said]
the protocols would not be endorsed until there is a solution to
Nagorno-Karabakh," said Aydın, adding that Erdogan has changed the
official position and has now tied the improvement of Armenian ties
to progress on the issue, rather than a comprehensive solution.

Armenia has occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, a region that legally belongs
to Azerbaijan, along with five adjacent regions since 1993. Turkey
closed its borders with Armenia as a result of the invasion.

Meanwhile, the Armenian Constitutional Court’s qualified support
for the protocols that has been perceived by Turkey as an obstacle
to progress has made it further difficult for the Turkish government
to send the protocols to Parliament.

Both Köni and Aydın said they see no indications of a breakthrough
on ether the Turkish-Armenian track or the Armenian-Azerbaijani track.

Feridun Sinirlioglu, the Foreign Ministry’s undersecretary, returned
empty-handed from a trip to the U.S. in which he had sought legal
clarifications on the Armenian court’s decision.

Despite this, government officials said intense negotiations are
continuing, especially for progress on the Karabakh problem. Turkey
has suggested a preliminary agreement could be signed based on the
withdrawal of Armenian forces from Karabakh in a move that would
help the government convince public opinion about the merit of the
Armenian protocols.

Armenia, however, is asking for concessions from Azerbaijan on the
future status of Karabakh before agreeing to a withdrawal, according
to a Turkish official.

While intense discussions are continuing, few in Ankara believe they
will bear fruit before April 24, the date Armenians commemorate
what they claim was the World War I genocide of Armenians in the
Ottoman Empire.

Turkey has told the U.S. the reconciliation process with Armenia, as
well as Turkish-U.S. cooperation on critical issues like Afghanistan
or Iraq would suffer in the absence of a potential breakthrough
with Armenia.

Such a message is likely to be delivered during Erdogan’s attendance
at a nuclear security summit hosted by Obama.

U.S. strategic needs, along with progress on Turkish reconciliation
with Armenia, should provide sufficient incentive to the U.S. to
block the resolution, said Aydın.

He also said it would be difficult, however, for the AKP to send the
protocols to Parliament, especially when general elections are nearing.

"Behind closed doors, I think Turkey will tell the U.S. that it had
initiated an Armenian initiative, thereby doing what the U.S. was
expecting the government to do. The AKP will tell the U.S.: ‘Public
opinion in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia is not letting us make
further progress. Trust me. Let me get over the elections and I will
continue the process.’"

San Fernando Valley ANC Hosts Reception For LA Councilman Koretz

SAN FERNANDO VALLEY ANC HOSTS RECEPTION FOR LA COUNCILMAN KORETZ

valley-anc-hosts-reception-for-la-councilman-koret z/
Mar 1st, 2010
ENCINO, CA

On February 11, 2010, the Armenian National Committee of the San
Fernando Valley-West (ANC SFV) hosted a wine and cheese reception
in honor of newly-elected Los Angeles City Councilman, of the 5th
district, Paul Koretz.

The Councilman was welcomed by local community leaders from the
Armenian Relief Society "Anahid" Chapter, Homenetmen "Massis" Chapter,
Hamazkayin Armenian Cultural Association "Baruyr Sevag" Chapter,
the Holy Martyrs Church Board of Trustees, as well as Holy Martyrs Rev.

Father Razmig Khatchadourian, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation’s
"Rosdom" Chapter, Armenian Youth Federation "Sardarabad" Chapter.

"Councilman Koretz has been a valuable asset to our community,"
remarked Kitsinian. "Chatting with him in this intimate setting reminds
us that the Councilman is always ready to affirm his commitment to
addressing the needs of the Armenian Community. He does so not only
effectively, but efficiently as well."

After an introduction by ANC-SFV Chairman, Nareg S. Kitsinian Esq.,
the nearly 40 attendees enjoyed a discussion with the Councilman who
spoke candidly of his close involvement and interest in the Armenian
Community. The conversation ranged from addressing quality of life
concerns to better engaging Armenian American youth in public and
community service through the Councilman’s office. Also joining the
ANC-SFV for the event were representatives from the Armenian Cultural
Foundation, Armenian National Committee-Western Region, and the Encino
Neighborhood Council.

"The Councilman’s eagerness to work side-by-side with his constituents,
as well as Armenian organizations, and Armenian community leaders is
always encouraging and we look at tonight as the first step in the
process," said Nichan Kulukian, an ANC SFV activist who participated
in the event.

The Armenian National Committee of the San Fernando Valley-West
advances the social, economic, cultural, and political rights of the
area’s Armenian American community and promotes increased Armenian
American civic participation at the grassroots and public policy
levels.

http://www.asbarez.com/77913/san-fernando-

Greece In Danger

GREECE IN DANGER
By Evaggelos Vallianatos

Hellenic News of America
newsid=11574&lang=US
March 2 2010

There’s little doubt that at the dawn of the twenty-first century
Greece is facing an existential crisis. Suddenly, in 2010, external
and internal enemies are closing in. The country’s external enemies
are scheming its dismemberment while some powerful Greeks in Greece,
doing the bidding of foreigners, are undermining the historical
continuity and cultural identity of the country, telling their fellow
Greeks they are not Greeks.

Cracks in Western civilization

The trouble started in the 1990s when the American air force blasted
Yugoslavia supposedly to protect Yugoslavian Moslems from Yugoslavian
Christians.

The first product of the dismemberment of Yugoslavia was the
independence of a Yugoslavian province neighboring Greek Macedonia.

Most of the people of this province are Bulgarians and Albanians. Yet
they have been calling themselves "Macedonians" and their tiny country
"Macedonia." In addition, this small country has the audacity of
claiming the Greek province of Macedonia. Its anti-Greek slogans
and the rewriting of history, memorized during its communist past,
have outraged the Greeks but don�t seem to bother America or the
countries of the European Union, which recognized it as "Macedonia,"
the name it stole from Greece.

This American and EU indifference towards the theft of Creek culture
makes mockery of Western civilization, which came into being from
the ancient Greek legacy of science, democracy and the arts of
civilization.

Starting during the Renaissance of the fifteenth century, Westerners
incorporated the Greek legacy into the pillars of their own culture.

Second and no less menacing, Turkey provokes Greece almost on a daily
basis, its warplanes flying over the Aegean. Again, Turkey�s blatant
and provocative violations of international law at the expense of
Greece cause no problems to America or its NATO partners or to the
27 countries of the EU. All these countries are officially allied to
Greece with Greece being a member of both NATO and the EU.

This is another example where America and EU operate beyond Western
civilization, burying the common culture they share with Greece for
the "strategic" delusion they have invented for Turkey.

Despite the 400-year occupation of Christian Southeastern Europe
by this Moslem country, her genocides against Greeks and Armenians,
America and EU have been rewarding Turkey for decades.

First, they did that supposedly to keep Turkey against Russia when
Russia was dressed in communist clothes. America was so obsessed
with communist Russia that it forced Greece to deny its strategic
national interests in the protection of its territorial integrity,
including the protection of Cyprus. Turkey must have told America that
unless it muzzled Greece, Turkey would be neutral in the cold war or,
worse yet, Turkey would join the empire of the Soviet Union-Russia.

After the "end" of the cold war in early 1990s, America continued
the same charade of why Turkey was indispensable to its strategy of
fighting its "war on terror." This time Turkey was important because
the government of Turkey is so successful in playing on the fears of
America of a resurgent Islam. Turkey has an Islamic government, but
the Turkish military convinces the American military and government
that Turkey is a secular society. Besides, Turkey is a huge military
base for America�s wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and, possibly, a future
war against Iran.

In its turn, the American government through NATO is pushing the
EU to open its ranks to Turkey. Strangely, EU obliges and has even
been carrying out conversations with Turkey about possible Turkish
membership to a European club designed by Europeans for Europeans.

Turkey also occupies 40 percent of the Greek island of Cyprus,
which is a member of the EU. The United Kingdom and America are not
innocent of the Turkish violent conduct against Cyprus. In 1974, they
encouraged Turkey to occupy Cyprus, so it is not surprising that the
EU is not complaining that Moslem troops control part of its territory.

Under these circumstances, one would expect Greece and Cyprus to
oppose the EU-Turkey political discussions. On the contrary, Greece
and Cyprus are the warmest advocates of Turkey�s inclusion to the EU.

Greece no doubt follows America�s directives that undermine its
independence. It�s also possible that Greece and Cyprus naively
hope or want to believe that Turkey in the EU will be a trustworthy
and peace-loving country. However, such a dramatic transformation is
not in the cards.

Moslem Turkey is not about to wear the mask of Western Christian
civilization, her enemy for centuries. Turkey is fast returning to
her imperial Islamic past. Turkey does not seem to care whether EU
can accommodate her or not. She is becoming an unchecked threat
in both Aegean and Mediterranean. Turkey is even downgrading her
trusted relationship with Israel, America�s oversight agent in the
Middle East.

A multicultural Greece?

This external danger complements an internal danger threatening the
remaking of Greece on alien models.

In Greece, there are some Greeks who want to see a different, radically
different, Greece, a country made up not just of Greeks but also
of several nationalities, resembling the multicultural society of
America or France or the United Kingdom.

For convenience, I will call these Greeks "pro-American Greeks"
only because many of them were educated in the United States and
their ideas emerge from studies funded by American institutions.

Curiously, the vision of the pro-American Greeks about Greece is
resurrecting the communist policies of the 1940s where being Greek
nationalist or making connections to the Hellenic legacy of modern
Greece were bad things to be avoided at all costs. Greek communists,
like the Christians whom they imitate, have never liked ancient Greeks.

Greek communists looked for ideology and support to Soviet Russia.

Now, some 70 years later, America provides the ideology and support
for another version of what Greeks ought to think of themselves. This
includes a revisionist Greek history that rejects Greek historical
continuity, charging that Greek romantics in the nineteenth century
invented Greek historical continuity as a weapon for nationalistic
expansion.

The problem with this fancy story is that it is fictional.

The Greeks never lost their consciousness as a people connected to
the ancient Greeks. They still speak Greek, the mother tongue of
Western civilization.

During the dark days of Christian excess against Hellenic culture,
Greeks kept copying the ancient Greek texts that we have today. Those
texts and the Greeks who brought them to Italy sparked the Renaissance,
which sparked the Scientific Revolution and made our world.

In the first half of the fifteenth century, George Gemistos Plethon,
a Platonic philosopher in Mistras, Peloponnesos, headed a lively if
small Hellenic Renaissance. He urged Constantine Palaiologos, the last
Greek Byzantine Emperor, to declare himself king of the Hellenes,
discard Christianity for the many gods of the ancient Greeks, and
replace his mercenary guard with a Greek national army.

Even during Turkish occupation, 1453-1821, the Greeks did not forget
their origins or common purpose to regain their freedom. Adamantios
Koraes, 1748-1833, the father of the Greek Revolution, got his ideas
and inspiration from the ancient Greeks and the Western Europeans who
became free and powerful because they had internalized the ideas of the
ancient Greeks. Finally, the Greek victory against the Italian invaders
on Mt. Pindos in Epiros in 1940 was no less glorious that the victory
of Athenians and Plataeans against the Persians in Marathon in 490 BCE.

The revisionists, however, ignore this historical continuity and
insist, instead, on a narrative that almost civilizes the Turks:
cleansing their crimes and atrocities; making the four dark centuries
of Turkish tyranny over Greece an era of prosperity and amity between
Turks and Greeks. The hope of the pro-American Greeks is that their
fictional theories would become readings for Greek children.

In addition, the practical result of this made-up Greek past is to
prepare the ground for a new generation of Greeks completely cut off
from their authentic past. Such Greeks would be obedient in executing
the demands of America, not merely in allowing the radical alteration
of the country�s population, but in accommodating the ambitions of
Turkey in the Aegean, Thrace and Cyprus, essentially handing Cyprus
to Turkey and dividing the Aegean between Greece and Turkey. That
way, these new pro-American mandarins expect, Turkey will stay in
the American camp and, therefore, control the damage America has
already caused in the Moslem Middle East because of its lunatic "war
on terror," which it is still prosecuting with religious fervor in
Iraq and Afghanistan.

Meanwhile, Greece is paying the price of America�s imperial politics
in her neighborhood: America�s enormous and hardly subtle influence
is, first, forcing pro-Turkish policies on Greek governments and,
second, is pushing multiculturalism on the Greeks. Both of these
policies are deadly to Greece.

Greeks have never been racists, but, in general, they did not mix
with non-Greeks whom they called barbarians. Even when the Greeks
controlled the Middle East for 300 years after the spectacular
conquests of Alexander the Great, they kept to themselves, neither
proselytizing nor marrying barbarians.

Alexander the Great, however, married the Persian princess Roxane and
encouraged his troops to marry Asian women. Alexander died young, so
not much came out of his policy of Hellenization of Asia. On the other
hand, he founded several poleis bearing his name, Alexandria. The most
famous, Alexandria in Egypt, remained essentially Greek for centuries.

Now, in 2010, Greeks are not celebrating any recent victories. On the
contrary, they are under the stress of accommodating and resisting
the globalizing and homogenizing forces of a non-Greek world led by
America. They resent multiculturalism, a mask of how to kill Greek
traditional culture.

Greeks might benefit from selective immigration of well-educated
foreigners, but not from opening their borders to all comers or to
giving Greek citizenship to the hundreds of thousands of illegal
immigrants in the country.

These illegal foreigners in Greece cause tension verging on outright
violence. They ought to be repatriated as soon as possible.

I was born in Greece, but received my college education in the United
States. I married a non-Greek, and made America my adopted home. The
country�s magnificent libraries led me to a personal Renaissance,
discovering my Hellenic identity.

Despite this indebtedness, however, I am troubled by America�s
militarism and perpetual wars that nullify the democratic tradition
it borrowed from Greece.

Second, multiculturalism is necessary for the United States. That�s
how it came into being. But American multiculturalism for Greece and
US pro-Turkish policies threaten Greece.

Considering also that a sizable number of the illegal migrants in
Greece are Moslems adds an explosive dimension to multiculturalism
and makes the socialist government�s proposal to grant them Greek
citizenship completely irresponsible and unattainable.

For example, Thrace in northern Greece has a Moslem minority, the
legacy of bad policies from the 1920s. Turkey then killed more than
a million Greeks and expelled close to 1.5 million more. Yet, Greece
allowed Turks to remain in Thrace.

Now the Greek Moslems of Thrace undermine Greek national integrity
and independence. They act like they are Turks, always embarrassing
Greece for alleged human rights violations. Adding more Moslems to
those of Thrace would be suicidal for Greece.

The 2004 Olympics

This and other troubles heightened after the very successful Olympics
of 2004.

Greece managed the complex and large-scale Olympic games with exemplary
insight, style and authentic hospitality, earning the appreciation
of thousands of athletes and hundreds of thousands of enthusiastic
observers attending the games from all over the world.

Greece did so well with the Olympics because, deep in their
consciousness, Greeks know the Olympics belongs to them.

The only major problem the Olympics brought to Greece was costs.

Greece borrowed heavily to meet the "security" requirements of the
George W. Bush America going haywire over its "war on terror."

Imperial revenge?

The first sign that something drastic was operating in the
post-Olympics Greece was the 2007 fires that destroyed the forests
of Peloponnesos, nearly burning ancient Olympia.

The fires laid bare the country�s poverty and the government�s
incompetence: There were not enough fire-fighting vehicles, airplanes,
and men. Greek forests turned out to be unprotected from the saws
of loggers and development plans of businessmen who, after fires,
would rush to build on the burned public land. The government also
did not have an accurate picture of the national forests.

In late 2009, Mikis Theodorakis, the famous Greek musician and
composer, accused superpower America for the Greek fires of 2007
because Prime Minister Kostas Karamanlis dared say no to George W.

Bush�s order to have nothing to do with Russia and China. Karamanlis
instead opened the doors of Greece to China and signed a petroleum
agreement with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin just before the
fires broke out. Theodorakis admitted the massive fires that immolated
so much of Peloponnesos terrorized him.

We don�t know what evidence, if any, prompted Theodorakis
to point his finger at America. He accused Henry Kissinger for
allegedly ordering, in 1974, the destruction of contemporary Greek
civilization. We can dismiss this charge as part of the mythology
Greeks have invented about America.

Theodorakis also said that thousands of "young Americans" occupy key
positions in television, radio, and institutes controlled by the state
and the Greek oligarchy. He alleged that it is these Americans working
within Greece who have shut down all creative forces in the country.

It is impossible to check out the veracity or error of these charges.

But one thing is certain about Theodorakis: He loves Greece. His
accusations against the United States mirror a widespread sentiment
or mythology among Greeks about America.

On the one hand, hundreds of thousands of Greeks have passed from the
shores of the United States. They are grateful for making a living in
America when it was very difficult to make a living in their country.

On the other hand, Greeks in Greece resent American policies in
their neighborhood: the creation of Moslem Bosnia and Kosovo, the
insulting recognition of the Slav-Albanian enclave as "Macedonia," and,
especially, the blatant pro-Turkish policies threatening them. Many
Greeks also fear that America is behind the efforts to destabilize
the country, altering its history, population, and culture.

On January 30, 2010, Panos Kokkoros, a Greek American living in
Sparte in southern Peloponnesos, explained the crisis of his country
as follows:

"The Greek people are being inundated by propagandists who preach
self-hatred. The communists / leftists have their own criminal agenda
and the conservative scum are always willing to do the bidding of
the American octopus….

"When it comes to immigrants I am not intolerant but there are limits.

A small number of immigrants is OK but a massive deluge is something
beyond reason…

"[T]he boors of northwestern Europe have never lived under the Moslem
yoke of slavery. How could they understand our history and ethnocentric
attitudes? We have the right to preserve our ethnic identity, culture
and religion as long as we are not tramping on anyone else. The
EU is not providing enough help to curtail the flow to our shores,
which are the southeast shores of the EU. Perhaps we should pass the
immigrants on to the rest of the EU or send them to the US. The US
is already a bastard ersatz society so they will not mind, right?

"Bear in mind that Turkey is trying to Islamize all of Europe so that
they can accomplish via the population bomb what they failed to do
with military invasion. The young punks in Athens who demonstrate
in favor of giving immigrants citizenship are fools, Bolsheviks or
ethno-suicidals. They want the people of Greece to discard an ethnic
identity that exists over 4,000 years…. The American attitude to
patriotic displays is just showmanship for political expediency. We
here in Greece are patriots especially when our homeland and identity
are menaced."

Kokkoros, born in America of Greek immigrant parents, is irreverent
of both America and Greece. He is facing the Greek crisis for what it
is – a mixture of hostile foreign and misguided Greek policies aiming
to remake Greece for the "strategic" convenience of the EU and America.

And he is right that both Western Europeans and Americans are
irresponsible to push their Islamic policies towards Greece that was
nearly annihilated under Islam.

Corruption

The next disaster struck in December 2008 when armies of thugs, who
covered their heads with paper bags, burned downtown Athens while
the police stood passive. Such savagery frightened the country and
undermined the Karamanlis administration.

Then, in 2009, another massive fire burned Attica all the way to the
suburbs of Athens. Once again, Greece was ill prepared to put these
fires out.

These calamities certainly had something to do with the defeat of
the rightwing prime minister, Karamanlis, and the coming to power of
the socialist prime minister, George Papandreou, who was born in the
United States.

Like Barak Obama, Papandreou inherited an economic crisis, Greece being
on the verge of bankruptcy. The EU will probably bail out Greece but
under severe conditions of fiscal discipline that are bound to hurt
both the economy and most Greeks. EU has to be careful. Spain, Portugal
and Ireland are not that far behind the financial meltdown of Greece.

Greece has been living beyond its means because it has to. It has no
technological or even tax-collecting infrastructure.

During World War II, Germans, Italians and Bulgarians destroyed all
that Greece had. Like the Gothic barbarians the Christians imported
to Greece in the fourth century to smash the temples of the "pagan"
Greeks, the barbarian occupiers of Greece in the 1940s left nothing
standing – bridges, railroads, government buildings, and factories.

They knocked everything down or burned it. They also starved the
country, killing about 10 percent of her population, the highest number
of dead in any other country caught in the violence of World War II.

In addition, Germans, Italians and Bulgarians plundered the
country�s gold and forced Greece to fund their occupation. Then,
when the occupiers lost the war and left Greece in 1944, the Greeks,
some of them inspired by communist Russia and others aided by England
and America, fought each other until 1949, completing the destruction
and impoverishment of the country.

In addition to this terrible legacy, Greece is under the shadow
of America.

The result of that unspoken dependency, verging on colonialism, has
been humiliating to the Greeks. The inevitable Americanization of the
country became a spigot through which the best and the brightest left
the country for Europe, including Germany, and the United States.

The American bosses of Greece picked up a few Greek families to run
the country. Two of those families, Karamanlis and Papandreou, rose
to the top, governing Greece for their private enrichment and the
cold-war interests of their American sponsor.

The Greek oligarchy ignored national self-reliance and
industrialization. The only economic activities that earn some living
for Greece include agriculture, the merchant marine, and tourism. As
for education, it is pitiful, always starved for money, libraries,
laboratories and advanced science and technology.

The membership of Greece to the EU helped the kleptocratic elites
to larger villas and thicker bank accounts. Goldman Sachs, one of
America�s banks, which the US Treasury Department bailed out in 2009
because it was "too large to be allowed to fail," has been advising
the Greek government how to hide its massive borrowing. But Goldman
Sachs, along with the German giant, Deutsche Bank, also manipulated
the Greek debt, thus bringing Greece on the verge of bankruptcy all
the while making billions from the financial woes of the country.

Like in the United States, the Greek population was left behind the
private enrichment of the few – both Greek and foreign. Many rural
Greeks abandoned their villages for overcrowded Athens and a few
other larger cities.

More than half of the economy operates in a black market. Another
substantive section of the economy, land, is another black hole because
it belongs to the church. The state refuses to tax the church, though
the church is the largest landowner in Greece. A responsible government
ought to take that land from the church, which is thoroughly corrupt.

In 2005, government investigators charged several bishops with fraud
and debauchery. Such criminal and unethical behavior, including
homosexuality, is typical of most bishops who live like medieval
princes. All of them are extremely wealthy from the systematic
appropriation of the meager but continuous financial contributions
Greeks make to their church. This is nominally a religious institution
that has become a big business.

Why should the Greeks tolerate a church that is a huge hacienda?

If the government redistributed all that church land to the landless,
it would create hundreds of thousands of jobs in the nearly abandoned
villages of the country, restoring justice, community and self-reliance
in food. Besides, the state considers every cleric a bureaucrat and
pays him a handsome salary. So why should these clerics be in business?

The state has no role in propping up corrupt institutions like the
church. But the state has a responsibility to help its citizens out
of misery, poverty, and other dangers.

The failure of the Greek government to act as a legitimate government
has forced the Greeks to embrace corruption. They take advantage
of the client relationships with their politicians to take hold of
government jobs, many of which are do-nothing jobs. Greece has about 8
times more bureaucrats per capita than other European countries. Those
who have to make a living, turn to the service industries, especially
tourism. But corruption is so pervasive that, according to my Athenian
friend Kostas Kalimtzes, "it has seeped into every social crevice
and into most minds."

Corruption is simply a modernized version of the corrupt way of life
the Greeks learned under the life-threatening conditions of Turkish
occupation. The legacy of that Dark Age is still alive in Greece.

Renaissance

A few things are necessary for the revival of Greece. It would help if
the United Stated abandoned its imperial hubris, hence its pro-Turkish
policies, treating Greece and Turkey with fairness.

Second, the EU ought to end the rapaciousness of large banks, indeed,
terminate the effects of globalization, giving priority to European
national and local institutions in development and culture. The US
ought to do the same thing. EU must also have some self-respect,
ordering Turkey out of Cyprus.

Third, in the Greek front, the Greeks must demand patriotism and
honesty of their politicians. If Papandreou keeps on his defeatist path
— pushing multiculturalism, following the advice of cannibalistic
corporations like Goldman Sachs, failing to tax millionaires and the
church — replace him with a patriot who will fight for Greece. This
means protecting Greece from its external and internal enemies.

Fourth, the real antidote to any Dark Age is a Renaissance, a
rebirth of traditions and culture most fitting people eager for a
more honorable life guided by reason. The Greeks are surrounded by a
Renaissance culture, now kept in the museums primarily for visiting
tourists. They have to open up these museums to themselves, and in
the process of discovery who they are, they will figure out Greek
ways to get back into their own Hellenic civilization, which made
Western civilization.

Once Renaissance catches on, nothing and nobody will be able to stop
the Greeks from reliving their original and creative culture. A
democratic, corruption-free and self-reliant Greece will restore
dignity, hope, and independence to its citizens, respect to its
friends, and fear and respect to its enemies.

Evaggelos Vallianatos is the author of several books, including
"The Passion of the Greeks."

http://www.hellenicnews.com/readnews.html?

ANKARA: Turkey Notes Adoption Of Genocide Resolution Would Hurt Ties

TURKEY NOTES ADOPTION OF GENOCIDE RESOLUTION WOULD HURT TIES WITH US

Anadolu Agency
March 1 2010
Turkey

Ankara, 1 March: Deputy Undersecretary of the Turkish Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (MFA), Selim Yenel, said Monday if the United States
Congress adopt a resolution on incidents of 1915 on April 24, 2010,
this would "hurt" bilateral relations between Turkey and the USA.

Yenel’s comments came after the Foreign Affairs Committee of the U.S.

House of Representatives began discussing a resolution regarding the
incidents of 1915.

Speaking to reporters in Turkish capital province of Ankara, Yenel
said that Turkey and the U.S. passed through a sensitive period.

There is a high possibility that the resolution may get adopted by
the Foreign Affairs Committee. However, this will not be the first
time that the resolution may get adopted by the Committee. A similar
resolution was adopted by the Committee in 2007, Yenel said.

If the resolution does get adopted by the Committee, the process until
April 24 will be extremely crucial. Within this process, Turkey has
held discussions with the U.S. administration, members of the U.S.

Congress and relevant U.S. officials. We have made the necessary
warnings to appropriate authorities in the U.S., Yenel stressed.

The Turkish Ambassador in Washington, D.C., Mr. Namik Tan, is making
all efforts pertaining to the resolution. Ambassador Tan held talks
with high level dignitaries of the Jewish community living in the U.S.

the other night, Yenel noted.

Touching on the normalization process between Turkey and Armenia, Yenel
underlined that Turkey wished for the continuation of normalization of
relations between the two countries. However, if the resolution gets
adopted by the Committee, his would seriously harm the normalization
process, Yenel indicated.

We not only wish the normalization of Turkey-Armenia relations but
also the normalization of Azerbaijan-Armenia relations. Turkey,
as part of its regional vision, wants to establish good relations
with all neighbouring countries and one of the important steps in
this direction is to facilitate the normalization of relations with
Armenia, Yenel said.

We are watching and observing the resolution’s process with great
"concern", Yenel underlined.

The Foreign Affairs Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives
will debate a resolution on the incidents of 1915 on March 4, 2010.

Every year, U.S. presidents deliver a speech on April 24 on the
incidents of 1915. Until 2010, no U.S. president has ever referred to
the incidents of 1915 as "genocide". The attitude of U.S. President
Barack Obama on the incidents of 1915 is being waited with great
curiosity in 2010.

In 2005, Turkey officially proposed to Armenian government the
establishment of a joint commission of history composed of historians
and other experts from both sides to study together the events of
1915 not only in the archives of Turkey and Armenia but also in the
archives of all relevant third countries and to share their findings
with the public. To date, the Armenian government has not responded
to Turkey’s proposal of establishing the historical committee.

ArmInfo News Agency Restores Justice In Chatham House’s Decision On

ARMINFO NEWS AGENCY RESTORES JUSTICE IN CHATHAM HOUSE’S DECISION ON ABDULLAH GUL’S SERVICES

ArmInfo
2010-03-02 19:51:00

ArmInfo. As a result of ArmInfo news agency’s claims, the Chatham
House, formally known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs,
has changed its formulation concerning Abdullah Gul’s services
regarding the Armenian-Turkish process.

To note, Chatham House has declared Turkish President Abdullah Gul a
Chatham House Prize 2010 Nominee saying that Andullah Gul "has played
a leading role in accelerating the unprecedented reconciliation process
between Turkey and Armenia, including through his ‘football diplomacy’.

Nicola Norton, Chatham House representative, told ArmInfo correspondent
that the Board of the Institute considered and approved the request
of the ArmInfo news agency, which pointed out that the initiation of
Armenian-Turkish reconciliation belongs not to the Turkish president,
but to the Armenian president. Consequently, ArmInfo also pointed out
that the "football diplomacy" could not be considered "his", i.e. of
President Gul the way it was mentioned in the initial formulation.

Thus, the formulation is replaced by the following one: "President
Gul has played a leading role, along with his Armenian counterpart, in
accelerating the unprecedented search for reconciliation between Turkey
and Armenia, including through the so-called ‘football diplomacy’.

Nicola Norton added that the Board of the Institute did not comment
on the reason for which Gul was nominated for the Chatham House Prize
2010 saying that the Turkish president’s role in the Armenian-Turkish
process is only one of other services on the list.

To recall, the official website of Chatham House, Abdullah Gul has
been a significant figure for reconciliation and moderation within
Turkey and internationally, and a driving force behind many of the
positive steps that Turkey has taken in recent years. Mr Gul has worked
to deepen Turkey’s traditional ties with the Middle East, mediate
between the fractious groups in Iraq and bring together the Afghan
and Pakistani leaderships to try to resolve disputes during 2009". It
is also pointed out that Gul made significant efforts to reunify the
divided island of Cyprus. "President Gul is an unwavering proponent
of anchoring Turkey in the European Union. Under his leadership,
Turkey has consolidated civilian democratic rule andpursued extensive
political and legal reforms to bring the country closer to European
standards of democracy and human rights", says the website.

To note, contending for the Prize are also French Finance Minister
Christine Lagarde and Croatian President Stjepan Mesic. The voting
for the nominees started on March 2 and will last till March 15.

Turkey Urges U.S. To Reject Resolution On Armenian "Genocide"

TURKEY URGES U.S. TO REJECT RESOLUTION ON ARMENIAN "GENOCIDE"

Xinhua
March 1 2010
China

ANKARA, March 1 (Xinhua) — Turkey Monday urged a U.S. House of
Representatives panel to reject a resolution that would recognize
the massive death of Armenians during the World War I as genocide,
semi-official Anatolia news agency reported.

Such a resolution would hurt Turkish-U.S. relations and undermine
efforts to normalize relations between Turkey and Armenia, Burak
Ozugergin, spokesman of Turkey’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, was
quoted as saying.

The resolution, which would be discussed by the Foreign Affairs
Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives Thursday, supported
baseless allegations of "genocide", Ozugergin added.

He called on the panel members to "act with a sense of responsibility,"
according to the agency.

Armenia has pushed for international recognition of the death
of Armenians under Ottoman rule as a genocide. Turkey denies that
charge and insists the Armenians were victims of widespread chaos and
governmental breakdown as the Ottoman Empire collapsed before modern
Turkey was born in 1923.

The two countries have no diplomatic or economic ties since Armenia
declared its independence in 1991. Last October, Turkey and Armenia
inked historic deals on normalizing ties and reopening their borders
after decades-old hostilities.

The agreements need to be ratified by both countries’ parliaments
before taking effect.