Armenian Mortgage Market Has Large Room For Development

ARMENIAN MORTGAGE MARKET HAS LARGE ROOM FOR DEVELOPMENT

ARKA
Feb 12, 2010

YEREVAN, February 12. /ARKA/. Armenian mortgage market has large
room for development, if not in 2010, then in 2011 and 2012, Manuk
Yerghnyan, the head of E-V Consulting Research Center, said Thursday
in Novosti International Press Center.

"Construction has such a big share in Armenia’s GDP not because it is
highly developed, but thanks to underdevelopment of other sectors,"
he said.

Yerghnyan said that Armenia’s per-capita construction lower than that
of Russia and the United States two or three times.

"This shows that there is a large room for building up housing.

Construction in Armenia could be propelled by demand spurring by
mortgage lending," he said.

No new houses were built in 2009.

Yerghnyan expects a rally in 2011 and 2012.

According to Armenian State Real Estate Cadastre, the number of realty
deals in Armenia rose 5.3% in Jan-Nov 2009, compared with the same
period a year before, and reached 137,100 by late November.

Prices for flats in Yerevan averaged AMD 265,600 per one square meter
in late November after falling 10.5% over the period between January
and November 2009, compared with the same period a year earlier.

Private housed in Yerevan became 4.5% cheaper in Jan-Nov 2009, compared
with the same period of the previous year, and averaged AMD 294,600
per square meter.

Prices for apartments in Armenia’s provinces rose 4.8% and prices for
private houses 7.9% in Jan-Nov 2009, compared with the same period
of 2008.

BAKU: Ali Hasanov: "If There Were Guarantees, Azerbaijan Would Becom

ALI HASANOV: "IF THERE WERE GUARANTEES, AZERBAIJAN WOULD BECOME MEMBER OF THE CSTO LONG AGO"

APA
Feb 12 2010
Azerbaijan

Baku – APA. "Naturally every government official is making statement
within the interests of own country. Of course, every statement is
responded adequately. Therefore we are not a side making choice in
this case", said Chief of Public-Policy Department of the Presidential
Administration Ali Hasanov in an interview to Vesti.az, APA reports.

Making comments on Israeli foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman’s
criticism against Turkey during his visit to Baku and some world media
reports about negative impact of this visit on Azerbaijani-Iranian
relations, Ali Hasanov said Azerbaijan was pursuing full independent
policy and was a leading country in the South Caucasus. "The issues
that whom does the Azerbaijani leader meet with and what they discuss,
have no relations to the interests of other countries. No country can
condemn or criticize Azerbaijan for this case. We are always stating
that we are far from the policy infringing the interests of other
countries. Azerbaijan is always pursuing the policy based on its
national interests and considering the common interest of its allies.

In this context, Azerbaijan continues to develop relations with
Israel. It doesn’t mean that we support all actions of Israel at
the international arena. I have to remind that Azerbaijan strongly
condemned the events in Gaza. We are always strongly criticizing the
actions against international law and humanism, but at the same time,
we support the Israel’s policy towards peace and stability all over
the world. I believe that Azerbaijan is pursuing right policy in
this context".

Answering the question how real is the opening of Azerbaijani embassy
in Israel after the Lieberman’s visit, Ali Hasanov said he couldn’t
gave exact time for the opening of the embassy. "But I can assure
you that Azerbaijan will open its embassy in Israel".

The official of the Presidential Administration also commented on
the experts’ opinion that Turkey will open the borders with Armenia
before the Azerbaijani territories are liberated.

"We are sure that Turkish leadership will keep its promise not to open
the borders with Armenia until the occupied Azerbaijani territories
are liberated. We are sure that Armenia’s policy on normalizing the
relations with Turkey will not be successful unless the Azerbaijani
territories are liberated and IDPs return to their native lands. The
opening of Turkey-Armenia border will not have any positive influence
on the atmosphere of cooperation in the South Caucasus unless the
occupation of Azerbaijani territories ends. In order to achieve
peace and progress in the South Caucasus there should not be closed
borders in the region. Otherwise, all the efforts aiming to improve
the situation will fail. Turkey understands it well, too," he said.

Ali Hasanov also took a stance on the views that for the solution
to Nagorno Karabakh conflict Azerbaijan should become member of the
Collective Security Treaty Organization.

"Who guarantees that Armenia will release the occupied territories
and Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity will be restored if Azerbaijan
becomes member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization? No one
guarantees this. If there had been such a guarantee, Azerbaijan would
have become the member of this organization. Moreover, we can stand
together with Armenia – the country that has occupied our territories.

Why doesn’t anybody protest that an aggressor country has become
member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization? Why don’t they
exert pressure on the aggressor? Why should we stand together with
the aggressor state within the same bloc? What can unite Armenia and
Azerbaijan in the issue of the collective security? On the other hand,
the Collective Security Treaty Organization states that it does not
intend to interfere in the conflicts of the member states. A question
arises: "From whom does this organization try to defend Azerbaijan? No
one has answered this question yet," he said.

Statement Of The Society For Armenian Studies

STATEMENT OF THE SOCIETY FOR ARMENIAN STUDIES

AZG DAILY #24
12-02-2010

February 8, 2010

Regarding the Historical Sub-Commission in the Armenian-Turkish
Protocols

Following a vote at the November 21, 2009, meeting of the Society for
Armenian Studies (SAS), which called on the SAS Executive Council
to prepare a statement concerning the Historical Sub-Commission
in the Armenian-Turkish Protocols; and following a vote of the SAS
membership in support of the statement; the SAS Executive Council,
on behalf of the entire SAS membership, hereby issues the following
statement regarding the proposed Historical Sub-Commission:

The recently-signed Protocols between the Republic of Armenia and the
Republic of Turkey call for a sub-commission with the vaguely defined
task of looking into existing historical problems for an impartial
examination of historical records and archives. The stated purpose
is to restore mutual confidence between the two nations. Although
no express reference is made in the Protocols, there is an almost
universal agreement that the Turkish side would use the sub-commission
as a vehicle for perpetuating its denial of the Armenian Genocide
and casting doubt on the validity of the massive body of evidence
establishing it as genocide.

While the Turkish government, in keeping with a long-standing state
policy, continues to make every effort to question and deny the
veracity of the Armenian Genocide, President Serge Sargsyan has on a
number of occasions asserted that the Genocide and loss of Armenian
patrimony cannot be questioned; that the Genocide is a known truth
and must be recognized and condemned; and that the reality of the
Genocide can in no way become a subject of discussion as part of the
agenda of the sub-commission.

The Society for Armenian Studies hereby firmly states that the Armenian
Genocide is an undeniable fact, established through dispassionate,
meticulous, and multilingual archival research by a great number
of experts, most of whom belong to respectable scholarly bodies of
renowned authorities such as the International Association of Genocide
Scholars and our own Society for Armenian Studies. The veracity of
the Armenian Genocide cannot and must not be subject to discussion
or to political give and take.

The Society for Armenian Studies was founded in 1974 by a group of
scholars from the universities of California, Columbia and Harvard
on the initiative of Richard G. Hovannisian, Dickran Kouymjian, Nina
Garsoian, Avedis Sanjian, and Robert Thomson. It is dedicated to the
development of Armenian Studies as an academic discipline.

The SAS Secretariat is located at the Armenian Studies Program
of California State University, Fresno. For more information,
visit , e-mail
[email protected], or write to Armenian Studies Program,
California State University, Fresno, 5245 N Backer Ave. PB4, Fresno,
CA 93740-8001.

http://armenianstudies.csufresno.edu/sas/index.htm

Boxing: Darchinyan Rips Donaire (Again)

DARCHINYAN RIPS DONAIRE (AGAIN)

FightNews.com
Feb 11 2010

WBC/WBA super flyweight champion Vic Darchinyan has continued his
vicious verbal assault on WBA interim champion Nonito Donaire, whom
he hopes to avenge a KO loss against. "The more I hear about Donaire,
the more it makes me feel he should be taking up a new job, maybe
he should take up a new occupation, he can take care of those in
need of retirement," said the popular Australian-based Armenian. "He
knows he got lucky and he wants nothing to do with fighting me. Arce
is finished, he fought a bum for a vacant world title and he calls
himself a champion, now Donaire wants to fight Arce. Give the fans
what they want. You don’t see Manny Pacquaio fighting opponents with
walking sticks. I’ve got two titles ready for you to take. You believe
you’re the man? Come and be a unified champion. You can fight Arce
after you fight me."

He continued, "The problem is you’re a freshly plucked chicken ready
for the oven. The fans want to see if you can be lucky a second time
around. The problem is you know whats going to happen when we fight.

You know you’re going to be knocked out cold. I don’t blame you for not
wanting to fight me. After you fight this bum on the weekend, I am here
waiting for you. You’re a fighter, act like a fighter. If not, I will
get you the audition dates for the next Victoria’s Secret catalogue."

Darchinyan is managed by Elias Nasser and promoted Gary Shaw.

Protracting Protocols Ratification, Turkey Tries To Get The Maximum

PROTRACTING PROTOCOLS RATIFICATION, TURKEY TRIES TO GET THE MAXIMUM FROM ARMENIA

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
11.02.2010 13:51 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Sardarapat initiative leader Zhirayr Sefilyan
supposes that by protracting ratification of Protocols, Turkey tries
to get the maximum from Armenia.

Slamming the presidential speech at Chatham House Royal Institute of
International Affairs, he said, "Serzh Sargsyan’s statements suggest
he is ready to cede the liberated territories. He hasn’t yet ventured
an open statement on the issue, since doing so would put an end to
his political career."

According to Sefilyan, conflict of superpowers’ interests, rather than
Armenia or Turkey, can become the reason behind rapprochement failure.

The Protocols aimed at normalization of bilateral ties and opening of
the border between Armenia and Turkey were signed in Zurich by Armenian
Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and his Turkish counterpart Ahmet
Davutoglu on October 10, 2009, after a series of diplomatic talks
held through Swiss mediation.

On January 12, 2010, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of
Armenia found the protocols conformable to the country’s Organic Law.

The conflict between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan broke out in
1988 as result of the ethnic cleansing the latter launched in the
final years of the Soviet Union. The Karabakh War was fought from
1991 to 1994. Since the ceasefire in 1994, sealed by Armenia, NKR and
Azerbaijan, most of Nagorno Karabakh and several regions of Azerbaijan
around it (the security zone) remain under the control of NKR defense
army. Armenia and Azerbaijan are holding peace talks mediated by the
OSCE Minsk Group up till now.

Northern Cyprus: Latest Wedge In Israel-Turkey Relations

NORTHERN CYPRUS: LATEST WEDGE IN ISRAEL-TURKEY RELATIONS

Tert.am
16:56 â~@¢ 09.02.10

The Israeli Foreign Ministry has curtailed the advertisements of
a company that offers tourism services to the Turkish Republic of
Northern Cyprus (KKTC), reports The Jerusalem Post.

According to the report by the Israeli daily, the Green Solution
company filed a suit against Artara, a company that specializes in
industrial fairs to promote economic activities in various sectors
and which is due to hold a fair on Mediterranean tourism, called the
International Mediterranean Tourism Market (IMTM) 2010, on Tuesday and
Wednesday at the Israel Trade Fairs & Convention Center in Tel Aviv.

Green Solution, which runs ferry service from Haifa to Famagusta
(Gazimagusa in Turkish) in northern Cyprus three times a week and
offers hotel accommodations in Famagusta and Kyrenia (Girne in
Turkish), signed up for a 20-square-meter booth at the fair to
advertise its services, the daily reported on Monday.

On the same day, an employee of Artara informed the Green Solution
company that "in view of the sensitivity of the Cyprus issue in the
fair, and in accordance with special directives which we received from
the Foreign Ministry," it would not be allowed to mention the fact
that the services provided were to "northern Cyprus" or to provide the
names of hotels, the daily said, noting that Artara also demanded to
see the advertisements that would be displayed two days before the
opening of the fair.

An Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesperson, approached by The Jerusalem
Post, said that Israel did not recognize northern Cyprus as a separate
entity, but did not prevent the private sector from maintaining
commercial and tourism ties with the inhabitants of that area. The
spokesperson suggested that this long-standing policy had nothing to
do with relations between Israel and Turkey.

War In Karabakh May Become True, If Any Superpower Push Sides Toward

WAR IN KARABAKH MAY BECOME TRUE, IF ANY SUPERPOWER PUSH SIDES TOWARD IT

news.az
Feb 8 2010
Azerbaijan

Gurgen Yegiazaryan "But the war may become real, if the United States,
for example, or any other superpower pushes the parties toward
this step".

Armenian former deputy minister of National Security Gurgen
Yegiazaryan commenting on the statement by director of the US National
Reconnaissance, Dennis Blair, who said war between Armenia and
Azerbaijan is possible has said: "I do not think that this statement
gives grounds to think so". He believes that despite Azerbaijan’s
bellicose rhetoric, it is not threatening to grow into hostilities
between the parties so far. "Such a statement proves West’s interest
in acceleration of several processes in the South Caucasus", he added.

Yegizaryan also said that we have already been in the state of
instability for already 20 years in terms of conflicts in the
Caucasus. "But the war may become real, if the United States, for
example, or any other superpower pushes the parties toward this step",
Yegizaryan announced.

Earlier, Dennis Blair, director of the US National Reconnaissance,
said during the hearings of the Senate Committee on Reconnaissance
issues that the situationsin the Balkans and the Caucasus remains
unstable. "War between Armenia and Azerbaijan is possible", Blair said.

US House panel to take up Armenian genocide bill

Ynetnews, Israel
Feb 5 2010

US House panel to take up Armenian genocide bill

Published: 02.05.10, 22:17 / Israel News

A US congressional panel will vote next month on a resolution to label
the World War One-era massacre of Armenians by Turkish forces as
"genocide," a move that could infuriate Turkey.

Howard Berman, the Democratic chairman of the House Foreign Affairs
Committee, said on Friday he intended to call a committee vote on the
non-binding resolution on March 4.

,7340,L-3844 933,00.html

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0

From Gaza To Lebanon: Beware The Iron Wall, The Coming War

FROM GAZA TO LEBANON: BEWARE THE IRON WALL, THE COMING WAR
By Ramzy Baroud

Online Journal
Feb 5, 2010, 00:25

The Israeli military may be much less effective in winning wars than
it was in the past, thanks to the stiffness of Arab resistance. But
its military strategists are as shrewd and unpredictable as ever.

The recent rhetoric that has escalated from Israel suggests that a
future war in Lebanon will most likely target Syria as well. While this
doesn’t necessarily mean that Israel actually intends on targeting
either of these countries in the near future, it is certainly the
type or language that often precedes Israeli military maneuvers.

Deciphering the available clues regarding the nature of Israel’s
immediate military objectives is not always easy, but it is possible.

One indicator that could serve as a foundation for any serious
prediction of Israel’s actions is Israel’s historical tendency to
seek a perpetual state of war. Peace, real peace, has never been a
long-term policy.

"Unlike many others, I consider that peace is not a goal in itself
but only a means to guarantee our existence," claimed Yossi Peled,
a former army general and current cabinet minister in Benjamin
Netanyahu’s right-wing government.

Israeli official policy — military or otherwise — is governed by the
same Zionist diktats that long preceded the establishment of the state
of Israel. If anything has changed since early Zionists outlined their
vision, it was the interpretation of those directives. The substance
has remained intact.

For example, Zionist visionary Vladimir Jabotinsky stated in 1923
that Zionist "colonization can . . . continue and develop only under
the protection of a force independent of the local population —
an iron wall which the native population cannot break through." He
was not then referring to an actual wall. While his vision took
on various manifestations throughout the years, in 2002 it was
translated into a real wall aimed at prejudicing any just solution
with the Palestinians. Now, most unfortunately, Egypt has also started
building its own steel wall along its border with the war-devastated
and impoverished Gaza Strip.

One thing we all know by now is that Israel is a highly militarized
country. Its definition of ‘existence’ can only be ensured by its
uncontested military dominance at all fronts, thus the devastating
link between Palestine and Lebanon. This link makes any analysis of
Israel’s military intents in Gaza, that excludes Lebanon — and in
fact, Syria — seriously lacking.

Consider, for example, the unprecedented Israeli crackdown on the
Second Palestinian Uprising which started in September 2000. How
is that linked to Lebanon? Israel had been freshly defeated by the
Lebanese resistance, led by Hizbullah, and was forced to end its
occupation of most of South Lebanon in May 2000. Israel wanted to send
an unmistakable message to Palestinians that this defeat was in fact
not a defeat at all, and that any attempt at duplicating the Lebanese
resistance model in Palestine would be ruthlessly suppressed. Israel’s
exaggeration in the use of its highly sophisticated military to stifle
a largely popular revolution was extremely costly to Palestinians in
terms of human toll.

Israel’s 34-day war on Lebanon in July 2006 was an Israeli attempt at
destroying Arab resistance, and restoring its metaphorical iron wall.

It backfired, resulting in a real — not figurative — Israeli defeat.

Israel, then, did what it does best. It used its superior air force,
destroyed much of Lebanon’s civilian infrastructure and killed more
than 1,200 people, mostly civilians. The resistance, with humble means,
killed more than 160 Israelis, mostly soldiers during combat.

Not only had Hizbullah penetrated the Israeli iron wall, it had also
filled it with holes. It challenged, like never before, the Israeli
army’s notion of invincibility and illusion of security. Something
went horribly wrong in Lebanon.

Since then, the Israeli army, intelligence, propagandists and
politicians have been in constant preparation for another showdown.

But before such pending battle, the nation needed to renew its faith
in its army and government intelligence; thus the war in Gaza in late
December 2008.

As appalling as it was for Israeli families to gather en masse near
the Israeli-Gaza border, and watch giddily as Gaza and Gazans were
blown to smithereens, the act was most rational. The victims of
the war may have been Palestinians in Gaza, but the target audience
was Israelis. The brutal and largely one-sided war united Israelis,
including their self-proclaimed leftist parties in one rare moment
of solidarity. Here was proof that the IDF still had enough strength
to report military achievements.

Of course, Israel’s military strategists knew well that their war
crimes in Gaza were a clumsy attempt at regaining national confidence.

The tightly lipped politicians and army generals wanted to give the
impression that all was working according to plan. But the total
media blackout, and the orchestrated footage of Israeli soldiers
flashing military signs and waving flags on their way back to Israel
were clear indications of an attempt to improve a problematic image.

Thus Yossi Peled’s calculated comments on January 23: "In my
estimation, understanding and knowledge it is almost clear to me that
it is a matter of time before there is a military clash in the north."

Further, he claimed, "We are heading toward a new confrontation,
but I don’t know when it will happen, just as we did not know when
the second Lebanon war would erupt."

Peled is of course right. There will be a new confrontation. New
strategies will be employed. Israel will raise the stakes, and will
try to draw Syria in, and push for a regional war. A Lebanon that
defines itself based on the terms of resistance — following the
failure to politically co-opt Hizbullah — is utterly unacceptable
from the Israeli viewpoint. That said, Peled might be creating a
measured distraction from efforts aimed at igniting yet another war
— against the besieged resistance in Gaza, or something entirely
different. (Hamas’ recent announcement that its senior military leader
Mahmoud al- Mabhouh was killed in late January in Dubai at the hands
of Israeli intelligence is also an indication of the involved efforts
of Israel that goes much further than specific boundaries.)

Will it be Gaza or Lebanon first? Israel is sending mixed messages,
and deliberately so. Hamas, Hizbullah and their supporters understand
well the Israeli tactic and must be preparing for the various
possibilities. They know Israel cannot live without its iron walls, and
are determined to prevent any more from being built at their expense.

Ramzy Baroud is an author of several books and editor of
PalestineChronicle.com. He is an internationally-syndicated columnist.

His latest book is "My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold
Story" (Pluto Press, London), available at Amazon.

Barack Obama Will Be Ready To Punish Turkey In Case Of Failure Of Ar

BARACK OBAMA WILL BE READY TO PUNISH TURKEY IN CASE OF FAILURE OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH PROCESS: ARMENIAN EXPERT

ArmInfo
2010-02-04 15:47:00

ArmInfo. Normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations the only issue
the USA, Russia and EU have no disagreements on in the region, says
Richard Giragosian, Director of the Armenian Center of National and
International Studies (ACNIS).

He thinks that the USA, Russia and the EU are waiting for actions
by Turkey. He is sure that the USA and Russia will exert pressure on
Turkey within the coming weeks since Turkey disappointed them by its
inconsistent policy. The expert supposes that activation of the process
on recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Washington may be one of
the measures of pressure on Turkey. "Barack Obama may use protraction
of ratification of the protocols to show how strong leaders he is,"
Giragosian says.