Turk MPs Caution France Over Armenia ‘Genocide’ Draft Law

TURK MPS CAUTION FRANCE OVER ARMENIA ‘GENOCIDE’ DRAFT LAW

Kathimerini, Greece
Oct 5 2006

PARIS (Reuters) – Turkish lawmakers warned yesterday that French trade
might be hurt and illegal Armenian immigrants expelled from Turkey if
France’s Parliament passes a law punishing anyone denying an Armenian
"genocide" of 1915. "If this bill is passed, it will damage the
interests not only of France, but also of Armenia," Sukru Elekdag,
a lawmaker in Turkey’s main opposition party, the Republican People’s
Party (CHP), told reporters at Turkey’s embassy in Paris.

"There are 70,000 Armenians today who are in Turkey illegally and
who are working… All these people will be expelled (if the bill is
passed)," he said, adding the bill would "poison relations between
Turkey and France."

BAKU: Speech Of Ilham Aliyev At Milli Majlis

SPEECH OF ILHAM ALIYEV AT MILLI MAJLIS

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
Oct 2 2006

Esteemed members of the Milli Majlis!

Ladies and gentlemen!

Esteemed guests!

Today is very wonderful and remarkable day; not only because the
Milli Majlis is beginning its work but also because the building of
the parliament has fully changed its appearance. Its both outward
appearance and interior design are meeting highest standards. Very
good conditions have been created here for parliamentarians. Major
repair work has been done for the short period of time. Today, it
is, of course, very comfortable to work in this beautiful hall, and
I am sure it will be very successful for our parliamentarians. The
improvement and construction works that are now underway in Azerbaijan
cover all areas: buildings are being reconstructed, and repaired, new
alleys are laid. We all want all the buildings repaired to meet high
standards. I am sure the activity of the Milli Majlis will contribute
to overall development of Azerbaijan, and improvement of the working
conditions, providing of the Milli Majlis’ building with up-to-day
equipment, will indeed increase the effectiveness of the work.

It has been already one year since the parliamentary elections,
and one can say, the new Milli Majlis is playing an important role
in development of Azerbaijan. New laws are passed, international
activities of the Milli Majlis are being improved, and meetings of the
parliament members with their voters are held in a regular manner. It
is very important because problems of voters are what must be solved
first and foremost. Much in this cause depends on the activities of
the Milli Majlis members. All that is being done serves one thing:
overall development of Azerbaijan, its conversion into a rich and
powerful state, modernization of the country and fully ensuring of
the principle of social justice.

You visit provinces very often, and meet voters and are familiar
with their concerns. We must work together to eliminate existing
shortcomings so not a single problem remains in Azerbaijan. It
is possible to do so. The existing socio-political situation in
Azerbaijan, confidence between power and people, successful activity of
the Milli Majlis are what defines our short- and long-term development
strategy.

The role of the parliament in the Azerbaijani society is growing,
it should be growing, and it is natural. It pleases me, as the
President, very much, because if the tasks set to the parliament
are solved, it will ensure overall development of our society. In
Azerbaijan, we are building a legal state. The rule of law must be
established. Azerbaijan should more rapidly integrate into the global
community, and serious reforms should be continued in all areas of
life. It is very gratifying that economic and political reforms in our
country are being implemented in parallel, and there are good results
of these reforms. There are tasks to be solved by the Milli Majlis,
and I am sure that your fruitful activities will play a significant
role in the all-round development and strengthening of our country.

I want to repeat that is has been a year since the parliamentary
elections. Over this year, Azerbaijan has managed to strengthen
its positions. Over the year, all the processes taking place in
our country have been positive be it foreign and domestic policy or
economic development.

Successful conduct of the parliamentary elections, the triumph of the
Azerbaijani people’s will, of course, opens new opportunities, new
horizons for our country. Parliamentary elections mark the beginning
of a new era. There were a few such periods in Azerbaijan’s history.

We remember well the years 1991-1993. That period remained in memory as
that of defeat. That period brought great difficulties to Azerbaijan,
our country faced great problems, and unfortunately, part of those
problems has remained topical until now.

Between 1993 and 2003, Azerbaijan experienced the period of stability
and development. Under the leadership of President Heydar Aliyev,
Azerbaijan managed to get out of the crisis with success, and occupy
a worthy place in the international community. Good conditions were
created to conduct reforms within the country. The overall situation
stabilized. If to take into account that our independence was
questioned in 1993, it has been considerably strengthened ever since.

Now, a new period begins. This period will define future development
prospects of Azerbaijan, and our long-term development depends
on how successful this period will be. Successful conduct of the
parliamentary elections and post-election strengthening of our country,
of creates new opportunities for our country. We try to build our
activities relating both foreign and domestic policy in the form of a
program. All the issues of concern are in the focus of attentions. The
program of regional development is being realized successfully. You
often visit regions, and probably can see our provinces changing
for the better. New houses, schools, hospitals, sport complexes,
are being constructed, and businesses are being developed. Migration
from provinces to the city is reducing, and I believe the time will
come when it will stop, and maybe migration from urban to rural area
will begin.

Our economic potential is growing. Both macroeconomic indicators
and daily life of our people prove it. For ordinary people, the
macroeconomic indicators are, maybe, not so important.

However, unless our economy grow 30%, it, of course, will be very
difficult to solve all the existing problems. Our budget is growing.

The Azerbaijan’s state budget has grown for the short period of time.

Some say it has happened due to oil. But you, members of the Milli
Majlis are well aware of this.

Of course, oil factor is very important for the economy of
Azerbaijan. However, non-oil sector also develops rapidly in
Azerbaijan. Now, we should focus our attention on this sector. We
must direct oil revenues to the non-oil sector, convert them into
human capital assets, spend them to settle the humanitarian issues
in order to ensure overall development of Azerbaijan, eliminate or
reduce oil dependency in the future. Budget increase allows settling
all the problems including economic ones facing the country. The 2007
draft budget is likely to be sent very soon the Milli Majlis. After
the budget is approved, it will be possible to do great work in 2007.

The major infrastructure projects in Azerbaijan are to be completed
in 2007-2008. Construction of electric stations, roads, gas and water
pipelines, schools, and hospitals must be completed in 2007-2008.

Thus, all the existing problems should be solved between 2003 and
2008. Our policy in this sphere is very open and clear. I am eager as
the President to achieve all these goals shortly. There are all the
possibilities to do it. I say once again that our economic potential
allows us to do it, of course, the positive socio-political environment
allows to do it as well. Strengthening of Azerbaijan’s international
positions results in cutting existing risks inside and outside the
country. It is one of the major directions of our policy.

We must protect our country, reduce risks and create the "space"
for cooperation in and around Azerbaijan. Only in this case, our
country can develop rapidly, and we can achieve what we want.

Legal state building should be continued in Azerbaijan now and
in the future. The process of democratization should be realized
more intensively. A wonderful future awaits us. Being successfully
implemented, oil strategy of Azerbaijan initiated by great leader
Heydar Aliyev brings fruits. Construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
oil pipeline is the historic achievement. The construction of this
pipeline will define a long-term economic strategy of Azerbaijan. In
this case, implementation of political reforms must be highlighted as
quite powerful economic potential, influx of money into our country
will, of course, strengthen it economically.

On the other hand, the influx of foreign currency needs to be
seriously controlled by the state, government, Milli Majlis and the
public. Realization of the scheduled programs can face disadvantages
without a serious public control.

Therefore, creation and strengthening of the civil society,
strengthening of democratization process, building of legal state is
not just a slogan or intention, it is the main condition for all-round
development of Azerbaijan. Our experience shows that the way that
Azerbaijan has chosen is the right way. Parallel implementation
of economic, political and social reforms develops Azerbaijan
comprehensively, strengthens the stability, which is so necessary
for our country, and has a positive impact on the socio-political
situation as well. Therefore, continuation of political and economic
reforms is the imperatives of our era. If we really want to create
modern and strong state, we should do this.

Great challenges face our state in this cause and, at the same time,
great responsibility lies with Milli Majlis as well. We must achieve
it together.

I think, major political, economic and social problems facing
Azerbaijan will be solved until 2008, since I want to say once more
that we do our job on the basis of concrete programs. I already
said that the program of socio-economic development of regions would
be instrumental in increasing the living standards in the regions,
creating new enterprises, opening new jobs. As you know, about 450
thousand jobs have been created to date.

Macroeconomic stability and this direction of our economic policy
will foster prevention of negative factors in our country. You
know that very good economic opportunities suddenly emerge in one
or another country, therefore, increasing the risks, including the
risk of inflation. Therefore, we should build our macroeconomic
policy in such a way as to have all the tasks facing the country be
solved without undermining macroeconomic stability. It is extremely
serious issue. Perhaps, we face this kind of problems for the first
time in the modern history of Azerbaijan, as we had to search for new
financial sources in previous years, strengthen financial discipline,
find extra source of revenue. But today, due to implementation of
our oil strategy, Azerbaijan will face the influx of a great amount
of foreign currency resources, which could have a negative impact on
the macroeconomic stability. It is vitally important question.

Implementation of the infrastructure projects became systematic. We
need to wrap up all the infrastructure projects until 2008, and
therefore, we have a great work to do. During many years, financial
squeezes did not allow us to earmark sufficient amount of funds
to this sphere. In these and subsequent years, much money should
be directed here. As to construction of schools, 600 schools have
been built for the past two years, very modern ones. Construction of
hospitals and social infrastructure objects. Ecological program has
been adopted; we will become the richest country. If the ecological
situation will not meet the standards, our citizens will face great
difficulties, and their health can be damaged badly. In other words,
major problems in all these spheres must be solved until 2008 with
Azerbaijan strengthening its positions even more.

Our policy on the international arena is successful. This shows that
our activity on the international organizations, at the same time, our
bilateral ties with numerous countries correspond to the interests of
Azerbaijani people. It is, first, the interests of Azerbaijani people
and state. We fully protect these interests. Our bilateral relations
strengthen our country. Azerbaijan’s role rises on the international
and regional organizations. Azerbaijan has the leading position in the
ongoing regional processes, and in many cases, we are the initiator
and participant of the important projects in region. None of regional
project is possible without consent and participation of Azerbaijan.

Of course, international positions of our country strengthen. We have
very efficient cooperation with the international organizations.

Azerbaijan has hosted several authoritative actions. We take active
part in the international organizations the member of which Azerbaijan
is. Simultaneously, Azerbaijan contributes to those organizations. And
gradually turns to important country, and this is a reality. The
present Azerbaijan differs from that of decade earlier. Representatives
of the world organizations also confirm it.

We have to use these opportunities to provide extremely the interests
of Azerbaijani people. We are open to all countries for cooperation,
and our foreign policy is sincere, accurate. All the statements we make
are realized. We have not made a single step for current situation,
or for short-term achievement. We behave ourselves deservedly.

At the same time, we are open for cooperation as well, and this
is reality. Azerbaijan is a respected and esteemed country on the
international arena and in the whole among the political community.

Importance of Azerbaijan rises. The reason is not only the oil-gas
projects, and even not the geographical position. Azerbaijan had
always oil and gas. Encountered with many obstacles, it required
great courage and great wisdom to develop these deposits, involve
the foreign investors, and transport it to world markets. I reiterate
all these were initiated by President Heydar Aliyev.

Azerbaijan’s geographic position is not merely of great significance,
if there was not the thought-over policy, the efforts to make
Azerbaijan a regional center. There are many countries in world with
better geographic position.

Regretfully, Azerbaijan has no direct way out to the world markets.

All our transport and energy projects are realized through pipelines
and transit. Despite of this, creation of strong transport
infrastructure in Azerbaijan raises our importance. We are the
initiator of several international projects. The Baku-Tbilisi-Kars
railway construction of which is to be launched soon will create a
new situation in the country. Azerbaijan becomes an only country to
connect Europe and Asia via the railway. This, of course raises our
importance in regional affairs.

We establish business links with the European Union. Our positions
are strengthening in the Islamic world, too. This cooperation is very
important for us. Azerbaijan has an undeniable role in regional and
other organizations. That is, one of this does not exclude the other.

They complete each other. Such policy of Azerbaijan is significant for
region. None is interested in tension in region. Nobody is interested
the existence problems in region led to any bitter conclusion. We
pursue our policy reservedly. We have a goal, are going towards this
goal and we shall do everything to reach it.

In a word, if to view at the prospects, Azerbaijan has no such a
serious problem. Personally, I do not see such one. It is because
we shall achieve the accomplishments in several years. In any case,
we have reason to state this for we have programs for each direction.

The only problem of Azerbaijan is the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno
Karabakh conflict, settlement of which does not depend only on us.

This is an only question that does not depend only on us. Moreover,
we do our best and Azerbaijan’s diplomatic efforts are made to resolve
this problem. Our position remains unchanged. I have also stated that
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity should be restored.

This is the major condition. Beyond of this, there cannot be any
agreement, any contract. The aggressive forces should withdraw form
the occupied lands. The UN’s four Resolutions be executed and put
an end to aggression. The citizens of Azerbaijan, who suffered form
ethnic cleanse should return to their homelands. Strengthening of
safety measures in region is possible, and we support this and the
Armenians in Nagorno Karabakh should be given high status. This is
our position. This position bases on history – we know well that
we received the Armenians in our lands as guest. This position also
rests on political situation – the political situation is in our favor
and gradually Azerbaijan’s importance rises. If to weigh up Armenia
and Azerbaijan, we shall see which one is of greater importance,
what is their potential and what these countries will face in coming
years. That is, from the point of view of development of political
processes, our position is favorable.

There is no need to stress legal point of the problem. We all know
well that from the legal standpoint, the question should be resolved
on base of our position.

That is, if to take all the factors, and, at the same time, the
growing economic potential of Azerbaijan, we shall see there are
nice opportunities to resolve the question. We, simply, adhering
the negotiations, have to continue our policy and actions. And
this comprises strengthening of Azerbaijan. Our country, using all
economic, diplomatic and political opportunities, should strengthen
its positions and be further active against Armenia. We are attacking
in information field. We have to attack in economic aspect and this
has to be on agenda on all international organizations, in all forums,
and bilateral format. We should expose aggressive policy of Armenia
and we have enough proofs to do this.

We have to strengthen our military potential and you know that since
I have been elected as President I keep in focus this question. I
have said then that Azerbaijan’s military budget should equal to
overall budget of Armenia, and we, probably, shall, achieve this
next year. We have to continue these pressures. If the Armenian
side should not see these attacks and afraid of them, worry from
the growing opportunities of Azerbaijan, they hardly liberate the
occupied lands. Armenia ignoring international principles, to our
great regret, is not blamed by the international organizations. It
has numerous reasons. You know them well. But this is reality. We
have to know this reality and withstand our reality, the reality of
Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan is a country not to tolerate with occupation
of its lands. It is a country, using its economic, political and
military potential, will achieve what it wants.

I have told this once, and I reiterate that sometimes Azerbaijan’s
army building process causes concern in somebody. It should not cause
concern. It is our sovereign right. We have been tolerating this
aggression for many years. Our biggest compromise is our adherence
to peace negotiations. But using all these opportunities, we have to
create new situation. I would note once again that the strengthening of
military potential does not lead automatically to war. This is the last
version. We have to be ready for this. Very country should be ready,
including the country the territory of which was occupied and lives
in conditions of war. But, simultaneously, I am convinced that using
our political, economic, diplomatic and regional factors, we shall
be able to exert pressure on Armenia. These are already evident…

We have to be on the offensive constantly. We must be active in
all spheres, all organizations to achieve what we want. We must use
economic factors, and these opportunities will increase gradually.

The government received instructions to the effect. After Azerbaijan
gets 100 times richer than Armenia, perhaps, there will be no need in
the option of war. Therefore, we have to seize all the opportunities
to restore our rights. It is our privilege. Nagorno-Karabakh is the
historic land of Azerbaijan. We will never allow the second Armenian
state to be created in the Azerbaijani lands. The whole society should
be consolidated. This unity exists today. I am very glad that there
is no discrepancy in the Azerbaijani society on this matter. In some
cases, our opponents want to criticize us saying why Karabakh problem
has not been solved. It is not settled because Azerbaijan will never
agree with what dissatisfies us. It is not settled because despite the
pressure, as a President, I will never agree with any agreement, which
is disadvantageous for the Azerbaijan State and people of Azerbaijan.

I already said that this issue depends not only on our desire.

Therefore, we have to work and be active. I repeat that we have to
mobilize our efforts. There are no other serious problems for us except
this one. This problem is number one, and we, of course, must and will
focus our potential on its settlement; everyone should know it. We
exert every effort to find a fair solution to this issue; territorial
integrity of Azerbaijan will be restored. I have no doubt about it.

Along with this, we are going to continue cooperation with
international organizations for the settlement of the problem. Today,
Minsk Group co-chairs have arrived again in Baku. We do not intend
to give up Minsk Group format. At the same time, we believe that,
involvement of other organizations can also assist to solve the
problem. Indeed, the Armenian side tries to undermine talks under the
pretext of the fact that the matter has been referred to the UN. It
is their business, they can cancel the negotiations. If they need a
pretext, they can easily find it. Azerbaijan behaves constructively,
participates in the negotiations and hopes that they will result in
the resolution of problem.

Dear friends, I want to say once more that further development of
our country seems very clear and bright to me. What kind of country
will Azerbaijan be? Which positions will Azerbaijan have in five,
ten years? What economic potential will it have? Which level will the
lives of people reach? – These are the questions we are thinking of
as we work for the future of our country, for the overall development
of Azerbaijan.

We want our country became a modern, rich and powerful state. And the
people lived here well, were rich, and that its economy, political
image was strong, and that grew our opportunities of influence on
the processes in region. We want this. Each country, probably, has
similar wish. But to want and to do this are different things. We
have all opportunities to realize our wish.

I can tell that today we have opened unique opportunities. How
will be Azerbaijan tomorrow, in the years coming – it depends on
us. We have to make every effort to create powerful state, much more
strengthen our independence. We have to fully direct the potential
of Azerbaijan to improve the life of people, and thus, create in
the country a civic society. Free society, legal state, supremacy
of law, strong economy, powerful army, flexible foreign policy,
reliable defense and strengthening of the interests of Azerbaijan –
these are the major directions we are going. We have programs on
all directions. We have our views at them, we know what we want,
where we go, we know what results expect us. And finally, we shall
have powerful country, strong Azerbaijan, and the Azerbaijani people
will live much better. We have to fruitfully work to achieve all these.

In the re-constructed building of Milli Majlis, there are nice
opportunities for this. On the way to Milli Majlis in the morning,
I remembered the earlier situation, and, of course, you see the vast
difference. I even said: "I wish I had worked in such reconstructed
building, but, never mind, hitherto, we, probably, will meet
frequently. I wish you success. I want to reiterate that I am very
pleased that the members of Milli Majlis regard their duty with great
responsibility, permanently are in touch with their electors, actively
take part in adoption of progressive laws, in the socio-political
life of country. The role of Milli Majlis, thus, increases. Public
sees and acknowledges it. I also see it. I am also pleased and from
this platform, I wish you success in further activity. I would like
to express confidence that we shall and henceforth work together,
all-round develop out country. Thank you.

Armenia Hopes Russia-Georgia Relations To Be Settled Through Talks

ARMENIA HOPES RUSSIA-GEORGIA RELATIONS TO BE SETTLED THROUGH TALKS
by Tigran Liloyan

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
September 30, 2006 Saturday

Armenian President Robert Kocharian hopes that Russian-Georgian
relations will be settled through talks.

"Armenia is interested more than other sides in the normalization of
Russian-Georgian relations," as their tense relations "affect the
economic situation" in the republic, Kocharian told journalists on
Saturday. "I hope that everything in Russian-Georgian relations will
be settled through talks," the Armenian president pointed out.

ANKARA: Dutch Political Parties Scrap Turkish Candidates Who Do Not

DUTCH POLITICAL PARTIES SCRAP TURKISH CANDIDATES WHO DO NOT ACCEPT ARMENIAN CLAIMS
By Neriman Kokdal (JTW)

Journal of Turkish Daily
Sept 29 2006

The two largest Dutch political parties have scrapped ethnic
Turkish-Dutch parliamentary candidates who refuse to acknowledge the
historical Armenian claims. Turks say the decision is discrimination
against the Turkish and Muslim peoples in the Netherlands.

The candidates include Ayhan Tonca of the governing Christian Democrat
Party (CDP). Tonca is one of the country’s most prominent Muslim
Dutch politicians and is chairman of an umbrella organization of
Muslim groups known as CMO. The Christian Democrats also retracted
the candidacy of Osman Elmaci, and the opposition Labor Party ended
the candidacy of Erdinc Sacan. Armenian lobby put great pressure on
the party.

Ethnically Turkish Dutch citizen Erdinc Sacan was previously on the
list for the upcoming November 22 elections in the Netherlands,
this after being elected to a leadership position in 2003 in the
Netherland’s Brabant State. The leader of the Dutch Social Democrat
Workers’ Party (SDWP) commented on the situation, saying "It was a
difficult decision. But there cannot be any ambiguity within our party
with regards to our stance on this question. The fact that Sacan was
not giving his support clearly to the party on this position left us
with no other choice."

The Turkish societies consider not to vote for these two parties in
the elections. More than 450.000 Turkish people live in Netherlands.

Most of the Dutch Turks think that the recent events are discrimination
against the Turkish people in the country.

The Armenian lobby argues that the 1915 Relocation Campaign under the
Ottoman Rule was a genocide and the modern Turkey is also responsible
for it. However Turkey has never accepted the claims. According to the
Turkish historians the armed Armenian gangs massacred more than 520.000
Turkish and Kurdish during these years. The Relocation decision was
taken by the Ottoman Government when some of the Armenian groups gave
armed support to the occupying Russian forces against the Ottoman State
during the First World War. About 800.000 Armenian were relocated from
the Western and Eastern Anatolia to the Syria province of the State.

The ISRO experts told the JTW that the latest removal decision will
definitely damage the ethnic relations in the Netherlands. "It is
very clear that the Dutch parties discriminate the Muslim and Turkish
people. You do not have accept the Armenian allegations. In Turkey,
some accept, some not. If you are a free country no one can impose on
you. Political parties are the symbols of freedom of speech. However
we see that the Dutch democracy is just for the white and Christian
Dutch people, not the colored and other religions" Dr. Nilgun Gulcan
from ISRO said.

Similarly Jan Soykok, ISRO expert, told the JTW that Armenian claims
are just claims, not more:

"If the politicians cannot use the right of freedom of speech, who
can say what he/she thinks about. I personally believe in that the
Armenians simply lie. This is my personal opinion and I do not need
any approval from any party or government to think so or not. There
is no court verdict about Armenian claims. They accuse Turkey and
Turkish people, and the Turkish people do not accept all these
claims. In fact Turkey argues that the real massacre was committed
by the Armenians. The Dutch parties are confused and they think the
Armenian genocide claims are like the Holocaust. As a matter of fact
that Israel and the Jews do not accept the Armenian allegations. The
Israeli Government clearly declared that the Armenian events are not
genocide and 1915 is not a tragedy like the Holocaust."

34 AGBU New York Summer Interns Take on Manhattan with Great Success

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x118
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:

PRESS RELEASE

Friday, September 29, 2006

34 AGBU New York Summer Interns Take on Manhattan with Great Success

A group of 34 AGBU interns from seven countries including Argentina,
Canada, England, Egypt, France, Lebanon, and the United States
immersed themselves in New York City’s culture, business, nightlife
and daily excitement as participants of the 20th season of AGBU’s New
York Summer Intern Program (NYSIP). After a rigorous application
process, these talented young men and women showed promise in their
academic achievements and diverse extracurricular interests. Through
the Program’s unique opportunities, each student not only interned at
a company related to his or her field of study, but also took on all
the challenges and excitement New York City has to offer.

In addition to a daily internship position, the eight-week Program
hosted a number of educational and cultural events for its 2006
participants, including an interactive session with Zarmine Boghosian
on the Armenian language; a lecture by sports marketing veteran, Paul
Kayaian, on the values and importance of professional networking; a
briefing on resume writing and interview tips by Ryan Herson of Young
& Rubicam; an outing to Sports Illustrated magazine for a question and
answer session with college football writer, Gene Menez; a night of
Armenian dance instruction led by the AGBU Antranig Dance Ensemble;
and community service projects at the Armenian Home for the Aged in
Queens, NY, and with local public television station Thirteen/WNET for
the Target-sponsored Kid’s Day. To expand their professional horizons,
interns attended a Mentoring Night sponsored by the AGBU Young
Professionals of Greater New York (YPGNY), where young professionals
from the community met with the students based on their fields of
interest to share their experiences in the working world.

Before the Program wrapped up, the President’s Club hosted the annual
Supervisors’ Reception at the AGBU Central Office in Manhattan to
thank the supervisors who spent their summers guiding and mentoring
the interns, teaching them valuable professional skills and serving as
role models. During the reception, twp interns Kara Boodakian from
Boston, MA who interned at Theatre Row, and John Chakardemian from
Beirut, Lebanon who interned at AXA Advisors, LLC, shared their
personal stories, lessons and memories from their time during the
Program and their stay in New York.

The keynote speaker Emmanuel Tchividjian, Senior Vice President of
Ruder Finn, Inc., shared his life story with the guests and provided
everyone with some helpful thoughts. "Everything takes, hard work,
dedication and patience. If I had to choose the one attribute that is
the most important in life, I would without a doubt choose
TRUST. Trust is at the basis of any human relation, whether personal
or corporate."

In addition, first time supervisor Stephanie Simon, Museums Reporter
for NY1News, spoke on her experience with AGBU, praised AGBU for
maintaining the Armenian culture and heritage, the importance of
connecting with people and ideas and the unexpected connection and
friendship that she developed with her intern, Tanya Baronian.

Before concluding the Program, Carol Aslanian, member of the AGBU
Central Board of Directors for the past ten years, spoke on behalf of
AGBU. Carol, who oversees AGBU’s Education Department, wished the
interns much success in the future, and praised them for their
commitment and hard work. She reminded the interns that each of them
has the potential to become great leaders of our Armenian community
and their countries’ respective societies.

To date, approximately 600 interns worldwide have benefited from this
extraordinary, life-changing program. The selection criteria is
challenging and interns must have completed their sophomore year of
college and have earned a minimum B+ average or its equivalent, for
international students. All applications and essays are carefully
reviewed to ensure that the interns are capable of meeting the
demanding internships available to them in a number of New York City’s
biggest and best employment sectors. Some of the many participating
institutions include: Columbia Records, Columbia University Hospital,
Moody’s, Merrill Lynch, NY1 News, Sports Illustrated, the United
Nations and UBS.

Sponsored by the AGBU President’s Club, the AGBU New York Summer
Intern Program () was established in 1987 by
Vartkess and Rita Balian, and is still currently under their
supervision in its 19th year. AGBU NYSIP places young, aspiring
Armenians in eight-week internships in the corporate, international,
art and medical worlds of New York, while providing a well-rounded
program of Armenian cultural, educational and community service
activities.

To obtain an application, please visit AGBU NYSIP’s website at
Please check the form for eligibility
requirements. The application deadline is December 14, 2006. For more
information, please email [email protected].

For more information about AGBU and its worldwide programs, please
visit

www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org/nysip
www.agbu.org/nysip.
www.agbu.org.

Amnesty International Concerned Over Dink Lot

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL CONCERNED OVER DINK LOT

PanARMENIAN.Net
28.09.2006 18:30 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Amnesty International posted a letter on its
website that stated it was dismayed at the news that "yet another
case has been opened against journalist Hrant Dink on charges of
‘denigrating Turkishness’ under Article 301 of the Turkish Penal
Code." "The organization considers that this prosecution is part of an
emerging pattern of harassment against the journalist exercising his
right to freedom of expression," the organization said in its letter,
entitled "Turkey: Journalist targeted yet again." Hrant Dink was given
a six-month suspended prison sentence in October 2005 on charges of
"denigrating Turkishness," which was upheld by the Court of Appeal in
July 2006, and if found guilty on the same charge, Dink would go to
prison, said the organization in its letter, and further added that
in that case Dink would be considered as a prisoner of conscience.

Amnesty International message also refers lately ceased case regarding
another writer, novelist Elif Shafak, on charges under Article 301
relating to statements made by characters in her novel The Bastard
of Istanbul," the Zaman reports.

Mine Found In River Gavar

MINE FOUND IN RIVER GAVAR

A1+
[12:46 pm] 29 September, 2006

On September 28 at 02:28 p.m. the Rescuers’ Service of Armenia received
information about a strange object taken out from river Gavar in city
of Gavar.

The object turned out to be an antitank mine.

The Rescuers’ Service informs that by 06:30 p.m. the mine was disarmed
thanks to the efforts of the sappers of Vardenis army corps.

EU Tells Ankara To Speed Up Reforms

EU TELLS ANKARA TO SPEED UP REFORMS

Gulf News, United Arab Emirates
Reuters
Sept 27 2006

Strasbourg, France: The European Parliament on Wednesday warned Turkey
that it must speed up far-reaching reforms if it wants to join the
European Union.

EU lawmakers adopted a highly critical, non-binding report which
accused Ankara of failing to live up to promises it made to win the
green light from EU leaders to start talks last October on joining
the bloc.

"The European Parliament … regrets the slowing down of the reform
process," the report said.

It said Turkey had shown "insufficient progress" on freedom of
expression, religious and minority rights, women’s rights and the
rule of law since the start of accession talks.

It demanded Turkey fulfil its obligation to open its ports and airports
to EU member Cyprus under a customs agreement. But parliament voted to
delete a clause which would have sought to make recognition by Ankara
of the mass killing of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey as "genocide"
a precondition.

EU: European Parliament Critical Of Slowdown In Turkey’s Reform Proc

EU: EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT CRITICAL OF SLOWDOWN IN TURKEY’S REFORM PROCESS

European Parliament

Sept 27 2006

In adopting a report on Turkey’s progress towards accession, MEPs
stated that they were critical of the slowdown in the reform process.

Relations with Cyprus and Armenia, as well as restrictions on freedom
of expression and religion, figured prominently in the report adopted
by 429 votes in favour to 71 against with 125 abstentions. MEPs
nevertheless welcomed some recent steps by the Turkish government in
the fields of combating torture, fighting corruption and extending
women’s rights.

The report reiterates the Parliament’s position that negotiations with
Turkey are an "open-ended process, and [do] not lead a priori and
automatically to accession while recalling that "the EU’s capacity
to absorb Turkey while maintaining the momentum of integration is
an important consideration in the general interest of both the EU
and Turkey."

MEPs called on the government in Ankara to recognize the Republic of
Cyprus, withdraw its forces from the island and lift its embargo on
Cypriot vessels and aircraft. The report reminds Turkey that a lack
of progress in implementing the Ankara protocol "will have serious
implications for the negotiation process, and could even bring it
to a halt." It also calls on "both Greece and Turkey to refrain from
tension-prone military activities."

Significantly, the EP rejected a provision that would have otherwise
called the acknowledgement of the Armenian genocide a "precondition"
for Turkey’s European Union accession. MEPs nevertheless stress that,
although the recognition of the Armenian genocide as such is formally
not one of the Copenhagen criteria, it is indispensable for a country
on the road to membership to come to terms with and recognise its
past. The House calls in this respect on the Turkish authorities to
facilitate the work of researchers, intellectuals and academics working
on this question, ensuring them the access to the historical archives
and providing them with all the relevant documents. MEPs urge Turkey
to take the necessary steps, without any preconditions, to establish
diplomatic and good neighbourly relations with Armenia, to withdraw
the economic blockade and to open the land border at an early date,
in accordance with the resolutions adopted by Parliament between 1987
and 2005, thereby fulfilling the Accession Partnership priorities and
the requirements of the Negotiation Framework on ‘peaceful settlement
on border disputes’ which are both mandatory for EU accession.

The House, at the same time, called for the abolition of the
"xenophobic and racist" Talaat Pasha committee. MEPs urged Turkish
authorities to "fulfil their commitments regarding freedom of
religion," since they noted an "absence of progress" in this area
since the last EP report.

Parliament condemns PKK terrorist violence

The House welcomed "the opening of broadcasting in Kurdish" while
nevertheless noting the continued intimidation of civil society
representatives in the South East of the country. The report
"strongly condemns the resurgence of terrorist violence on the
part of the PKK" and "calls on the PKK to declare and respect an
immediate ceasefire." It also pleads for "a democratic solution to
the Kurdish issue following Prime Minister Erdogan’s encouraging
statement last year.".

Despite the recent acquittal of the novelist Elif Shafak, the EP
remained troubled by the remaining barriers to freedom of expression in
Turkey. It called for the abolition or amendment of those provisions
of the Penal Code which threaten European free speech norms —
such as Articles 216, 277, 285, 301 (which foresees punishment for
"denigrating Turkishness"), 305 and 318. The Parliament also expressed
its "serious concern" about the "non-respect for women’s rights"
and the high role of the military in Turkish public life.

The European Commission announced last week that the publication of
its next annual report on Turkey’s progress towards accession will
be delayed by two weeks, until 8 November.

Debate – 26 September 2006

Ahead of the vote on the report by Camiel EURLINGS (EPP-ED, NL)
on Turkey’s progress towards accession, MEPs debated the issue and
expressed a wide range of views, many being critical of the slowdown
of the reform process in Turkey. MEPs pointed out that Turkey still
had a long path to tread before accession.

Opening the debate, rapporteur Camiel EURLINGS (EPP-ED, NL) described
his report as "fair but tough" and said its basic conclusion was
that the EP regretted the "slowdown in reforms" in Turkey, although
he did compliment the Turkish government on its 9th reform package.

Freedom of expression was the first problem area Mr Eurlings
highlghted, saying that Article 301 of the Penal Code [on "insulting
Turkishness"] must be changed or abolished. This was important not just
for the EU but for Turkish people. Freedom of religion was another
issue. Confiscated property must be restituted to monasteries and
churches and they must be allowed to start training clergy once more.

Turning to the situation in south-east Turkey, the rapporteur made a
point of strongly condemning PKK violence but called on Turkey to try
to find a political solution. As to Cyprus, Turkey must fulfil its
commitments and implement the Ankara Protocol before the end of 2006
which had sought to find a way of "normalising relations" with Cyprus.

On the sensitive subject of the Armenian genocide, Mr Eurlings
stressed that he wanted to preserve his own wording in paragraph
50 of the resolution, saying that recognition of the events was not
a criterion for accession, although Turkey should seek to "come to
terms with its past" by allowing inquiries into the events.

Minister for European Affairs Paula LEHTOMÄKI, speaking for the Council
Presidency, said: "Every debate provides a good opportunity to increase
awareness of Turkey’s accession process, to engage the citizens of the
EU Member States and of Turkey in this process, and to support the
Turkish government in its accession path. I can assure you that the
Presidency will take due note of the views of the European Parliament.

The Presidency shares the European Parliament’s concerns regarding
Turkey’s reform process. Turkey needs to give new impetus to the pace
of the political reform and vigorously pursue the reform process.

Full and effective implementation of the reforms is of utmost
importance for Turkey to ensure the irreversibility and sustainability
of the changes. Concrete results are required.

We also share your views on Turkey’s limited progress in such crucial
fields as fundamental freedoms and human rights. Even if Turkey has
made significant progress compared to the situation five years ago,
further tangible reforms are necessary especially in the areas of
freedom of expression, freedom of religion, cultural rights, women’s
rights, and combat against torture and ill-treatment. In the revised
Accession Partnership, most of these issues are defined to be among
the short-term priorities that Turkey needs to meet without delay.

At present, the Presidency looks forward to the adoption of the ninth
legislative package with a view to being able to address some of the
outstanding issues. We reiterate that the new laws need to be fully
in line with the EU standards.

In the area of freedom of expression, in particular, the Council
expects immediate action to avoid legal action being brought against
people who have expressed non-violent opinions and thus violated
certain provisions of the Turkish Penal Code. As for freedom of
religion, we expect that Turkey fully and without delay implement
the legislation that provides for the rights of non-Muslim religious
minorities in compliance with the European standards.

Like the Parliament, we are equally concerned about the tense
situation in south-east Turkey. The Presidency has condemned the
recent bomb attacks in several locations in Turkey as irrational
acts of terrorism. Terrorist activities can never be justified. This
is a complex entity of issues that we closely monitor as a part
of the ongoing reform process. Turkey needs to swiftly develop a
comprehensive approach to help reduce regional disparities with a
view to enhancing the economic, social and cultural opportunities of
all Turkish citizens, including those of Kurdish origin.

In addition to the Copenhagen political criteria, Turkey’s progress
in meeting the accession criteria is measured in relation to
the requirements clearly set out in the Negotiating Framework –
including the implementation of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara
Agreement, which is an essential element of the advancement of the
negotiations. Turkey must apply the Protocol fully in its relations
with all EU Member States and remove all obstacles to the free
movement of goods, including restrictions on means of transport. The
opening of negotiations on the relevant chapters depends on Turkey’s
implementation of its contractual obligations concluded with the EU
Member States. Failure to implement these obligations in full will
affect the overall progress in the negotiations.

We will make sure that the progress made on the key issues, set out in
the Declaration of the EC and its Member States on 21 September 2005,
will continue to be monitored this year.

Compliance with the Union’s standards and membership criteria requires
hard work and continuous efforts and determination. Our message is
clear and consistent. We attach particular importance to Turkey’s
accession process, and I can assure you that the Presidency will do
its best in order to facilitate further progress in the negotiations.

The Union will continue to support Turkey in its efforts, but progress
will depend on Turkey’s performance. The accession process will proceed
provided that Turkey respects its commitments to the carrying out of
the reforms and satisfies the existing obligations. "

Enlargement Commissioner Olli REHN agreed that the momentum for
reform had slowed. Progress had been made but the negotiations were
"an open process" with no automatic guarantees. "The integration of
Turkey would be of mutual benefit", he said, adding "the EU needs a
prosperous and stable Turkey".

However, he highlighted freedom of expression as a problem, especially
Article 301 of the Penal Code, which he said "violates European
standards". He went on "I cannot imagine a Member State of the EU which
does not respect the fundamental principle of freedom of expression".

On freedom of religion, he supported Mr Eurlings position on church
property rights and the current restrictions on the training of
clergy. Turning to south-east Turkey he, like Mr Eurlings, condemned
the PKK but called for a government policy not purely based on security
considerations. Regarding Cyprus, the Ankara Protocol must indeed
be implemented, he said, though an end to the economic isolation of
northern Cyprus could not be linked to this.

In conclusion, he told the House, "it is in our mutual interest that
Turkey pursues its transformation". It could serve as a bridge between
Europe and Islam, thus helping Europe to cope with "the greatest
challenge of our time". Ultimately, however, it was up to Turkey to
take reform further. Indeed the Copenhagen criteria should perhaps be
called the Ankara criteria, as "they are there for Turkish citizens,
not to please the EU".

Political group speakers

Speaking on behalf of the EPP-ED group, German MEP Elmar BROK stressed
the issues of human rights, minority rights, freedom of religion and of
expression. These, he said, were "preconditions" for EU membership. We
must clearly "spell out the facts": Turkey must fulfil the criteria. So
far it had not even implemented the Ankara Protocol. He also emphasised
that the financial aspects of the negotiations must be dealt with and
that the EU had "no financial leeway" under the Financial Perspective.

For the Socialists, Jan Marinus WIERSMA (NL) argued that the EU
"needs Turkey as a partner". The negotiation process was the best
way to build better relations with the country and there must be no
ambiguity: the aim of negotiations was to achieve Turkish membership.

He supported rapporteur Camiel Eurlings on the Armenian genocide:
Turkey should "recognise" what happened but this could not be a sine
qua non for membership as it was "not part of the Copenhagen criteria".

Andrew DUFF (ALDE, UK) on behalf of his group, stressed that EP’s
role was "to promote parliamentary democracy in Turkey". This meant
encouraging Turkey’s modernisation not putting up "spurious blocks"
to the process. Turkey’s candidature was a "defining moment for the
EU". If there were a "train crash" in Cyprus, there would be two
trains involved: one carrying "Turkey’s efforts to create a viable
reform of European Islam, where the prophet meets the Enlightenment",
the other carrying Europe’s efforts to develop a strong common foreign
and defence policy, to which Turkey could make "an extraordinary
contribution".

On behalf of his group, Joost LAGENDIJK (Greens/EFA, NL) said there
was a big problem with one point of the Eurlings report in its present
form: the paragraphs in which, following amendments instigated by lobby
groups, recognition of the Armenian genocide by Turkey was described
as a precondition for Turkey to join. He backed Mr Eurlings’ effort
to reinstate his original wording on this point.

More generally, he stressed the importance of being "critical but
fair" towards Turkey. The EP must "support people in Turkey who are
fighting for the same things as us".

For the GUE/NGL group, Vittorio AGNOLETTO (IT) said that his
group favoured Turkish membership of the EU. Nevertheless, there
had to be a political and diplomatic resolution to the Kurdish
question. The Turkish government had labelled the whole Kurdish
people as terrorists. He urged the Turkish government to talk to the
PKK and he also condemned the 80 writers and journalists being held
under Article 301 of the Turkish penal code.

For the UEN group, Konrad SZYMAÑSKI (PL) said that he welcomed the
critical report. Turkey still had a long way to go before it could join
the EU he said, namely Turkey must respect the rights of the Christian
minority. He also compared Ukraine to Turkey saying the former had
a much better record on human rights and prospects for membership.

Bastiaan BELDER (NL), for the IND/DEM group, also welcomed the report
but stated that the freedom of religion could not be exercised in
Turkey. He criticised the so-called "deep-state" for entering all
facets of society.

Andreas MOLZER (AT), a non-attached MEP, said that progress on
reform had been slow in Turkey. The EU had extended the deadline for
the recognition of Cyprus, but Turkey had still not done this. The
political reality was that Turkey was not ready to join because of
Cyprus, the non-recognition of the Armenian genocide and the Kurdish
question.

British and Irish Speakers

Sean Ó NEACHTAIN (UEN, IE) said: "May I say at the outset, that I am
a member of the European Parliament high level contact group that is
dealing with forging closer relations with the Turkish community in
Northern Cyprus. I am clearly aware of the sense of isolation that
many Turkish Cypriots feel, in light of the rejection of the Annan
plan. In fact, I believe that the European Union, together with
the United Nations, should continue to work in building peace and
reconciliation on the island of Cyprus.

But, Turkey too has serious obligations. For example, I do believe
that Turkey must open it’s ports and airports to Cypriot ships and
plans. This is an obligation that Turkey will have to honour, in
accordance, with the accession negotiations dealing with the Customs
Union chapter. I also feel that Turkey is going to have to look at
repealing clause 301 of it’s penal code. It is clear that significant
efforts are still needed in the field of human rights and fundamental
freedoms within Turkey."

Gerard BATTEN (IND/DEM, UK) questioned why Turkey wanted to join the
EU in the first place. May be he said, they wanted to join "the other
parasite nations" living off the British and German taxpayers.

Turkey, he said, should think about the impact of accession on itself;
it would mean, he said, losing control of its own destiny.

Charles TANNOCK (EPP-ED, GB) said that his party was in favour of
Turkish membership of the EU. However, the EU had to consider its
absorption capacity and potential impact on the structural funds. Mr
Tannock also highlighted the risks of unrestricted free-movement of
Turkish workers into the EU. Some studies, he said, had shown that
Turrkey was one of the most anti-American and anti-Israeli countries.

In particular, Mr Tannock criticised Turkey’s support for theocratic
Iran. Mr Tannock also pointed out the problems relating to the
recognition of the Armenian genocide and Cyprus. He said the
negotiations with Turkey would be "lengthy".

Simon COVENEY (EPP-ED, IE) stated that he had spent the previous week
in Turkey with the Human Rights subcommittee. He welcomed the draft
report as "tough but fair". On the Armenian issue, he said, that it
should not be a new pre-condition for accession. Mr Coveney said that
he supported the principal of Turkish membership, nevertheless he
was particularly concerned about the freedom of expression including
Article 301 of the Penal Code and resolving the Kurdish question.

Glenis WILLMOTT (PES, UK), like several other speakers, argued that
"the European Parliament needs to be frank" with Turkey about the
"serious problems" relating to freedom of expression, reform of the
security services and implementation of human rights legislation.

However, criticism must be "balanced, fair and honest". The prospect
of EU membership "has empowered modernisers and human rights defenders
in Turkey". And it would be "wrong to establish new preconditions
for membership that were not applied to other members".

In conclusion, she said "an EU with Turkey will entrench
multiculturalism" and help understanding between different religions.

Response to the debate – Council

Minister LEHTOMÂKI, replying for the Council, said that the debate
had been very thorough and highlighted the many challenges for both
Turkey and the EU. Turkey, was undoubtedly an important strategic
country. Enlargement would be carried out on the principal of equal
treatment and merit. It was important for Turkey to ratify and
implement the Ankara agreement which would allow trade with Northern
Cyprus and the access of Greek Cypriot ships into Turkish ports.

There also had to be a solution found at the UN level.

Response to the debate – Commission

Standing in for his colleague Olli Rehn, Development Commissioner
Louis Michel said the debate had set out the main issues clearly and
the Commission would take it into account in its report on Turkey
due for publication on 8 November. The Commission’s report would
be rigorous, objective and based on a wide range of data, including
Parliament’s views.

He stressed that in areas such as Iran, Iraq, the Middle East, the
dialogue between civilisations and the energy crisis, "Turkey is a
key player and an indispensable ally" of Europe.

It would, however, have to meet all the obligations – no-one would
be waving a magic wand. The Commission would be pushing the process
forward but it was important to point out that "Turkey does not have
to be evaluated today". Negotiations were very much "an evolutionary
process" and it was unfair just to take a snapshot of the current
state of affairs.

On the Armenian genocide, Mr Michel emphasised that this had never
been a precondition and to impose it as such now would amount to
"moving the goalposts". What mattered was "freedom of speech" and a
process of "internal awareness raising and conciliation".

–Boundary_(ID_y00R3gD/AF68m4 s/ejCJAg)–

http://www.europarl.eu.int/

Fete Du Cinema a Rome: 16 Films En Competition Et Beaucoup =?unknown

FETE DU CINEMA A ROME: 16 FILMS EN COMPETITION ET BEAUCOUP D’AVANT-PREMIèRES

Agence France Presse
26 septembre 2006 mardi 3:05 PM GMT

Seize films seront en competition du 13 au 21 octobre lors du premier
festival de cinema de Rome où de nombreuses oeuvres seront projetees
en avant-première, a annonce mardi le maire Walter Veltroni, balayant
toute idee de concurrence avec la Mostra de cinema de Venise.

"La Mostra de Venise etait superbe et j’espère a present que nous
aurons une belle fete a Rome", a souligne le maire de la capitale
italienne lors de la conference de presse de presentation de la Fete
du cinema de Rome, a laquelle il avait convie Davide Croff, president
de la Fondation de la Biennale de Venise.

"Grâce a Venise et Rome, l’Italie parlera pendant deux mois de
cinema. Les deux villes se donnent la main avec respect et amour
reciproques", a ajoute M. Veltroni, alors que le nouveau festival se
tiendra a peine plus d’un mois après la Mostra de Venise et qu’il
est dote de plus de moyens financiers que la doyenne des festivals
italiens.

Seize longs-metrages seront en competition a Rome pour les prix du
meilleur film (dote de 200.000 euros) et des meilleures interpretations
feminine et masculine, qui seront adjuges par un jury de 50 spectateurs
encadres par le cineaste italien Ettore Scola.

"Le voyage en Armenie" du Francais Robert Guediguian, "La strada di
Levi" de l’Italien Davide Ferrario, "A Casa nostra" de l’Italienne
Francesca Comencini ou encore "Jardins en automne" du cineaste georgien
Otar Iosseliani figurent parmi les films selectionnes.

Neuf films, hors competition, seront projetes en avant-première:
l’actrice australienne Nicole Kidman ouvrira le cycle en presentant
lors de la soiree d’ouverture "Fur", de l’americain Steven Shainberg,
film où elle interprète la photographe americaine Diane Arbus.

Figurent egalement dans cette categorie "N" ("Napoleon et moi",
film de l’Italien Paolo Virzi avec le Francais Daniel Auteuil et
l’Italienne Monica Bellucci) ou encore "The Namesake", film americain
de la realisatrice indienne Mira Nair.

Enfin, une troisième et dernière categorie, "Evenements speciaux",
donnera notamment lieu a la projection de "The Departed", thriller
policier du realisateur americain Martin Scorsese avec Leonardo Di
Caprio, Matt Damon et Jack Nicholson.

–Boundary_(ID_7KiOqAD5gcnTYyyppLKbgg) —