BAKU: EU welcomed Aliyev’s decree on improving of election practice

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
May 13 2005

EUROPEAN UNION WELCOMED AZERBAIJAN PRESIDENT’S DECREE ON IMPROVING OF
ELECTION PRACTICE
[May 13, 2005, 12:31:09]

Heikki Talvitie, special representative of the European Union for the
South Caucasus, has held a press-conference at the British Embassy in
Baku.

At first, Mr. Talvitie has informed journalists about his meeting
with President Ilham Aliyev, head of the President’s Administration
Ramiz Mehdiyev, Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, members of
parliament’s standing commission for interparliamentary end
international relations and leadership of the Central Election
Commission.

He noted there were mainly discussed the issues on settlement of the
Armenian-Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, preparations for
parliamentary elections, some aspects of the Turkish-Armenian
relations.

The special representative said the discussions for that that
Azerbaijan could have elections that correspond to the international
standards for free and fair elections.

Mr. Talvitie has emphasized that after his meeting with President
Ilham Aliyev he is sure that Azerbaijan’s leadership wants to be held
free and fair elections. He also on behalf of the European Union
welcomed Azerbaijan President’s decree on improving of election
practice.

Armenian president meets outgoing UN coordinator

Armenian president meets outgoing UN coordinator

Arminfo
12 May 05

YEREVAN

Armenian President Robert Kocharyan today held a meeting with the UN
Resident Coordinator and permanent representative of the UNDP in
Yerevan, Lise Grande, who is completing her mission in the republic.

The president noted during the meeting that although the UN office had
always been active, over the last two years it has become even more
active thanks to Lise Grande’s leadership, the presidential press
service told Arminfo.

For her part, Lise Grande noted that thanks to its consistent work
Armenia has achieved better results, than its neighbours in the region
and albeit from afar she would continue to follow the developments in
Armenia.

ANKARA: Armenians Apply to Belgium Senate

Zaman Online, Turkey
May 10 2005

Armenians Apply to Belgium Senate
By Selcuk Gultasli, Vedat Denizli

An application has been submitted to the Belgium Senate to intensify
a bill that foresees prison and financial penalties for those who
deny the occurrence of the Armenian “genocide”. The Armenian lobby
that needs 15 signatures to reinforce the bill for the Senate review,
applied to the Senate with 19 signatures on Monday, May 9.

The nineteen-signature application targets a bill to facilitate
punishments against the “deniers”. Since there is no international
court decision that accepts the so-called Armenian “genocide”, it is
difficult for the Armenian draft to be put into practice. Therefore,
the Armenian lobby expects the removal of this article from the
draft.

The alteration offer containing the 19 signatures will primarily be
addressed at the Justice Commission. They need nine votes for the
confirmation of the alteration offer at the Commission where Turkish
Fatma Pehlivan is a standby member. The Commission comprises of three
Fleming Socialists, three Walloon Socialists, three Fleming Liberals,
two Walloon Liberals, two Fleming Christian Democrats, one Walloon
Christian Democrat, and two racist Fleming senators.

Anticipations indicate the Fleming and Walloon will say “no” to the
alteration proposals of the socialists. They need the support of
three more senators to disapprove the proposal. Expectedly, if the
Commission decides in line with the demands of Armenian lobby, the
Senate General Council will also confirm the draft.

BAKU: Yuri Merzlyakov says of Azerbaijani captives to be released so

Today, Azerbaijan
May 5 2005

Yuri Merzlyakov says of Azerbaijani captives to be released soon

04 May 2005 [17:24] – Today.Az

“Three Azerbaijani soldiers captivated by Armenia will be released
soon”.

Russian co-chairman of OSCE Minsk Group Yuri Merzlyakov informed APA
of it in his exclusive report to APA.

He stated that he quoted personal representative of OSCE
Chairman-in-Office Anjei Kasprishik.

Y.Merzlyakov touched on interesting point in his report. According to
him, one Armenian is in captive in Azerbaijani side. Stating that the
problem of freeing the captives will be solved complexly, co-chairman
said that one Armenian and three captivated Azerbaijani soldiers are
expected to be released at the same time.

However, Azerbaijani side didn’t agree with Russian co-chairman’s
opinions concerning the captivation of one Armenian soldier by
Armenia. APA was informed from State Commission on Captivated, Missed
and Hostage Citizens, they don’t keep any captive at all, and the
matter should be investigated with the Defense Minister. Head of
press service of Defense Ministry, Ramiz Malikov informed APA that,
he has no information about it .R.Malikov said that Azerbaijani
soldiers have been in captive of Armenia for 2 months 18 days, and
he expresses his regret that Russian co-chairman justifies Armenian
side.

APA was informed from International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC)
representation in Baku, Armenian side applied ICRC about a year ago
stating that Armenian soldiers crossed the territory of Azerbaijan
and asked aid for releasing him:” International Committee of Red
Cross(ICRC) representation in Baku sent letter to relevant
structures of Azerbaijan. But Azerbaijani side didn’t confirm the
existence of such fact”.

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/19232.html

Bush’s Messages to the Baltic States, Russia, and Georgia

President Bush’s Messages to the Baltic States, Russia, and Georgia
by Ariel Cohen, Ph.D.

Heritage.org, DC
May 4 2005

Research: Russia & Eurasia

President George W. Bush’s visit to Latvia, Russia, and Georgia
underscores how much the geopolitical landscape in that part of the
world has changed in the 13 years since the collapse of the Soviet
Empire. In Riga, Bush will speak to the leaders of Estonia, Latvia,
and Lithuania, now members of North Atlantic Treaty Organization
and European Union and strong allies of America. Bush’s second stop,
Russia, once a rival, is now a strategic partner-an appropriately vague
term, to be sure. Georgia, the President’s final stop, and neighboring
Azerbaijan are emerging allies. The President must convey different
messages to the people and leaders of each country, while promoting
American foreign policy and security interests.

In Riga, Bush should acknowledge our new allies’ great achievements in
transitioning to democracy, adopting market economies, and becoming a
part of NATO. But he must remember that each of these countries has
raised a younger generation that doesn’t remember Soviet occupation
and is not as pro-American as its parents. This generation needs to
know that the U.S. was firm in its support of Baltic independence
and never recognized Soviet annexation. The task now is to keep these
young people friends of America.

While Bush should avoid creating new dividing lines in Europe, he
should still call for Russian recognition of Latvian and Estonian
borders and for Russia to finally sign a peace treaty with them. The
President could also tell the people of the Baltic states that their
well-earned and much-deserved freedom should not be dishonored by
expressions of sympathy to Nazis or by discrimination against their
Russian populations.

Russia presents different challenges. The President should address
the people of Russia through the usual press conferences and also by
meeting with democracy activists. He will likely address the great
sacrifices of the peoples of Russia and the former Soviet Union in
World War Two-a topic dear to every Russian’s heart.

Joseph Stalin was no doubt Adolph Hitler’s enabler in starting the
war, and the Soviet regime then was as bloodthirsty as the Nazis.
Stalin removed the top Soviet generals and was criminally negligent
and oblivious to the coming Nazi attack-Operation Barbarossa, which
started in June 1941. Soon millions of Soviet soldiers were surrounded,
and whole field armies were destroyed.

It was, however, the blood and heroism of millions of Russians,
Ukrainians, Tatars, Jews, Georgians, and others who stopped the Nazi
war machine. The battles for Stalingrad and Kursk broke the backbone
of the Wehrmacht. Marshal Georgii Zhukov’s gift for strategy helped
a lot. Still, the Soviets lost 25 million of their sons and daughters.

Bush can remind his audience that the Red Army’s World War II
victories were due in part to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “lend-lease”
program: Studebaker trucks, Cobra fighter planes, SPAM, and GI boots
all played crucial roles.

Today the U.S. and Russia face a new enemy: implacable Islamist
terrorists coveting weapons of mass destruction (WMD). In talks
with Putin, Bush should advance joint efforts against proliferation,
such as the Nunn-Lugar program that spends up to $1 billion per year
to secure and destroy the creaky Russian WMD arsenal and related
materials. The U.S. and Russia should work together to prevent Iran
from obtaining nuclear weapons. While Teheran still lacks the missile
capability to strike the U.S., it could hit Russian soil today. The
two leaders should also discuss challenges the U.S. and Russia may
face in the future from an assertive and resource-hungry China.

America can also help the Russian people address several catastrophic
social trends: HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis epidemics and male life
expectancy that has fallen to just 58 to 59 years-lower than even
in Egypt. Russia suffers from waves of alcoholism, drug addiction,
and related illnesses, and its abortion rate is among the highest in
the world. This is not about geopolitics but helping Russians to lead
healthier, happier lives.

When meeting with Russia’s democracy activists, President Bush should
explain why America is promoting democracy around the world. Without
stentorian lectures, Bush can explain how democracy benefits Russia,
why free media helps fight corruption, and how transparency and the
rule of law attract foreign investment. If Russia wants to modernize,
it needs to liberalize. It is in the Russian national interest to be
free. The U.S. can help-if Russians want it to.

Finally, his speech at the Independence Square in Tbilisi will be
a great opportunity for the President to address the future. Bush
should acknowledge Georgia’s Rose Revolution, a bloodless victory
for democracy. He should express America’s and the world’s hopes that
Georgia will remain on the democratic path and that its territorial
integrity and sovereignty will be restored. The U.S. should support
the return of secessionist Abkhazia and South Ossetia to Georgia’s
fold and the withdrawal of Russian military forces from Georgian soil.

Further, President Bush should demand an end to the “frozen conflicts”
between Armenia and Azerbaijan in Nagorno-Karabakh and in Transnistria
in Moldova. These conflicts have gone on for too long and leave all
sides miserable and impoverished.

Finally, the President should express hope that peoples of the
region-from Belarus to Turkmenistan to Uzbekistan-will have their
right to elect their leaders respected. Tbilisi would be a terrific
location to launch a new campaign for a better future in the former
Soviet area, a future where dignity, the rule of law, civil society,
economic development, and freedom prevail.

Ariel Cohen, Ph.D., is a Senior Research Fellow in Russian and Eurasian
Studies and International Energy Security at The Heritage Foundation.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/RussiaandEurasia/wm736.cfm

Laura Kennedy to call Turkish leadership to open border with Armenia

LAURA KENNEDY TO CALL TURKISH LEADERSHIP TO OPEN BORDER WITH ARMENIA

Pan Armenian News
04.05.2005 05:01

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Deputy Assistant to the US Secretary of State Laura
Kennedy is arriving in Ankara to discuss a number of issues with
the Turkish top officials, Yerkir Online reports. During her visit
to Ankara Laura Kennedy is also expected to touch upon the Armenian
Genocide perpetrated in the Ottoman Empire at the beginning of last
century and call Turkey to open the border with Armenia.

BAKU: Azeri FM Elmar Mammedyarov met with Condoleezza Rice

Today, Azerbaijan
May 3 2005

Azeri Foreign Minister Elmar Mammedyarov met with Condoleezza Rice

03 May 2005 [14:19] – Today.Az

Foreign Minister Elmar Mammedyarov attended the meeting of American
States’ Organization on Democratic Societies member states and observer
countries in Chile.

According to the information given to APA from Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, head of the foreign policy office made a speech in the
conference on forming of democratic principles and institutions.
Mammedyarov’s speech was about the issues on reaction of regional
organizations to the dangers for development of democracy. Head
of MFA touched on Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict widely, stressed
the importance of restoration of the rights of more than a million
internally displaced people as the result of aggressive policy of
Armenia in his speech.

Elmar Mammedyarov also presided the plenary meeting dedicated to
the problems in Europe. According to the information given to APA
from the MFA, Foreign Minister also conducted several bilateral
meetings in the frame of the conference. Meeting with the USA State
Secretary Condoleezza Rice, E.Mammedyarov discussed the measures
to be implemented in the direction of developing Azerbaijan-USA
relationships.

Condoleezza Rice and Elmar Mammedyarov also exchanged opinions
concerning the preparation matters to the visit of the USA delegation
to attend the opening ceremony of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline on
May 25.

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/19207.html

Mamedyarov: There are forces not interested in NK peaceful Settlmnt

Pan Armenian News

MAMEDYAROV: THERE ARE FORCES NOT INTERESTED IN KARABAKH PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT

29.04.2005 07:50

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Some details of the meeting of the OSCE Minsk Group
Co-Chairs and the Azeri FM Elmar Mamedyarov became known yesterday, Echo
daily reported. The parties focused at the frequent cease-fire violations,
release of the three Azeri POWs and details of the Karabakh conflict
peaceful settlement. However E. Mamedyarov did not satisfy journalists’
curiosity on the last issue. In his opinion, making the detail public can
destabilize situation in the region. Upon completion of the talks the
Azerbaijani FM told journalists that `the discussions showed some
development but there are still certain discrepancies in the positions of
the parties.’ Stressing the necessity of the soonest release of the Azeri
prisoners of war and refraining from any comments on the settlement process
details Elmar Mamedyarov said, `There are some forces in the region, which
are not interested in the peaceful settlement of the conflict and they can
use the information to worsen the situation.’ The Minister did not touch
upon the possible date of the Armenian and Azeri Presidents either.
Immediately after the Frankfurt negotiations Elmar Mamedyarov departed for
Chile to take part in the International Conference of the Organization of
American States dedicated to democracy development. During the conference
the Azeri FM is expected to give a report on Nagorno Karabakh. It should be
noted that yesterday the Russian Foreign Ministry reported that OSCE MG
Russian Co-ChairYuri Merzlyakov is expected to return on May 3. Thus, it is
not ruled out that negotiations between the Minsk Group Co-Chairs and
Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian will be held in Europe within next
several days.

Azeri People Does Not Want War Against Armenia

AZERI PEOPLE DOES NOT WANT WAR AGAINST ARMENIA

YEREVAN, APRIL 29. ARMINFO. “Azeri people does not want a war against
Armenia yet”, Head od conflict-science and migration department of
Baku Peace and Democracy Institution Arif Yunusov expressed such an
opinion in an interview to journalists in Yerevan. He participates at
“Caucasus 2004” International conference started today in Yerevan.

Yunusov noted that about 40% of Azeri people are the adherents and 30%
the opponents of the war, and the rest 30% are undecided. “When they
have their position, it will be clear whether the war is be or not. It
is most likely that we will have a Cyprus variant “neither war nor
peace”, he noted. At the same time, Yunusov did not excluded that some
political forces may use the Karabakh issue to achieve their own
purposes. He noted the activated from Feb 2005 skirmishes at
contact-line resulted to death of about 50 people of both sides.

“The main trouble of both Armenian and Azeri people is that every one
wants the “fair” peace but in its own good, which is, certainly does
not coincide with the other’s point of view. In fact, we have a choice
between bad and the worst peace, However, we have even not reached
it”, Yunusov noted. He also stressed the necessity to create the
atmosphere of confidence and to establish contacts between the
people. “Absence of contacts is a big shortcoming”, Yunusov concluded.

Analyst predicts “soft revolution” for Azerbaijan – Armenian agency

Analyst predicts “soft revolution” for Azerbaijan – Armenian agency

Arminfo
29 Apr 05

Yerevan, 29 April: A “soft revolution” is possible in Azerbaijan. This
is the opinion of Arif Yunusov, head of the conflict studies and
migration department at the Institute of Peace and Democracy, who
spoke at the international conference “The Caucasus 2004” which is
under way in Yerevan.

Briefly describing the situation in Azerbaijan in the wake of
[Azerbaijani President] Ilham Aliyev’s coming to power, the political
analyst said that as opposed to [his father and the late Azerbaijani
President] Heydar Aliyev – a strong personality and “father of the
nation” – Ilham Aliyev has turned out to be a weak politician. What is
more, he has failed to fit in his father’s team. For instance,
whereas under Heydar Aliyev there were only two clans, people hailing
from Naxcivan and those hailing from Armenia, a trend towards
oligarchy has started under Ilham Aliyev.

As an example of the weakness of the incumbent president, Yunusov
cited that under Heydar Aliyev “no minister dared to say ‘I reckon’,
but only said ‘we reckon'”. Thus, the trend towards oligarchy has
brought about many mini-presidents in Azerbaijan, Yunusov
said. Another proof of the weakness of Ilham Aliyev’s policy is an
unsuccessful attempt at dismissing Health Minister Ali Insanov. This
[weakness] has effectively resulted in a duopoly: the president is in
charge of foreign relations, while Ramiz Mehdiyev, head of the
presidential administration, decides on domestic issues. Hence, Ilham
Aliyev has been given the role of the British Queen.

A distinctive feature of the recent period has been the opportunity
given to oligarchs to invest the accumulated funds in Azerbaijan,
Yunusov said. Whereas Azerbaijan previously registered net capital
outflow, the situation has reversed now. In the political analyst’s
view, the gulf between the political system and economy can result in
a clash.

Speaking about regional processes and their impact on the situation in
Azerbaijan, Yunusov said that the war in Iraq has already affected
Azerbaijan and a possible war in Iran may have unpredictable
consequences for Baku. At the same time, there are some circles in
Azerbaijan which advocate a military operation in Iran, Yunusov said.

Describing the situation and noting Azerbaijan’s role as a
springboard, the political analyst recalled the modernization of seven
airports and the “American servicemen who have turned up in
Azerbaijan”. In this connection, Yunusov said that Tehran has made
unprecedented concessions by allowing to open an Azerbaijani consulate
in Tabriz [capital of Iran’s East Azarbayjan Province], making
concessions on the status of the Caspian Sea and “condemning Armenia’s
aggression”.

In exchange, Azerbaijan pledged not to station foreign troops on its
territory. However, to skirt round this obstacle, Azerbaijan dubs them
“mobile units”. The political analyst links the recent visit by US
Defence Secretary [Donald Rumsfeld] to Azerbaijan to an attempt to
agree on specific deadlines for stationing mobile units.

In the opinion of Yunusov, the domestic political situation in
Azerbaijan is, by and large, quite tense and unpredictable in terms of
infighting within the Azerbaijani leadership, lack of strong will, an
economic boom and external factors. Arif Yunusov offered a scenario
whereby a “soft revolution” keeps Ilham Aliyev in office and he goes
on playing the role of the British Queen. However, the “guard” of
Heydar Aliyev resigns and a big group of pro-Western MPs ends up in
parliament.