RA President To Make Speech In Chatham House

RA PRESIDENT TO MAKE SPEECH IN CHATHAM HOUSE

PanARMENIAN.Net
05.02.2010 10:47 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ During a working visit to London, Armenian President
Serzh Sargsyan will make a speech on the Armenian-Turkish relations
in Chatham House, an informed source in London told PanARMENIAN.Net.

According to the source, the UK intends to intensify activities in
the Caucasus, specifically in the Armenian-Turkish process.

"Supporting Turkey’s accession to the EU, the UK realizes that Ankara’s
way to Europe lays through Armenia. Apparently, this was the motive for
inviting President Sargsyan to London. It’s notable that Serzh Sargsyan
is the first Armenian President invited to the UK," the source said.

President Sargsyan will be in London from February 9 to 11. The
lecture in Chatham House is scheduled for February 11.

Chatham House, formally known as the Royal Institute of International
Affairs, is a non-profit, non-governmental organization based in
London whose mission is to analyse and promote the understanding of
major international issues and current affairs. It is regarded as one
of the world’s leading organizations in this area. It takes its name
from its premises, a grade I listed 18th century house in St. James’s
Square designed in part by Henry Flitcroft and thrice occupied by
British Prime Ministers including William Pitt, 1st Earl of Chatham.

The current chairman of the Council of Chatham House is Dr. DeAnne
Julius and its Director is Dr. Robin Niblett, who succeeded Professor
Victor Bulmer-Thomas in January 2007. The three Research Directors
are Bernice Lee, Dr Paola Subacchi and Alex Vines OBE. Keith Burnet
is Director of Communications. Dr Rosemary Hollis, a prominent Middle
East expert, is a former Director of Research.

Chatham House was named the top non-US think tank by Foreign Policy
magazine. Chatham House was also listed as one of the top "scholars"
for being among a handful of stars of the think tank world who are
regularly relied upon to set agendas and craft new initiatives.

Armenia Regains Activity In Global Cultural Events

ARMENIA REGAINS ACTIVITY IN GLOBAL CULTURAL EVENTS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
04.02.2010 GMT+04:00

Last week was notable for the following cultural events:

The140th birth anniversary of Komitas was marked in Kaiser-Wilhelm
Church in Berlin last week. The event started with a service offered by
Archimandrite Eghishe, the spiritual leader of the Armenian community
of Berlin.

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Such events are important for preservation of
national identity. They help the young generation know their culture,"
chairman of the Armenian church and cultural community of Berlin
Petros Tikichian said in his opening remarks.

Community member Sona Aiber-Chukaszyan gave a report on Komitas’ life.

"It was a great evening, filled with the energy and spirit of Komitas,"
Father Eghishe told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

The event was attended by art workers, historians, students and
representatives of the Armenian community of Berlin.

* During the 8th session of Armenian-Georgian intergovernmental
commission on economic issues, parties reached an agreement the
reconstruction of Surb Gevorg Church in Tbilisi, said commission
Co-Chair Vardan Badalyan.

"An agreement containing a clause on church reconstruction will be
signed today between relevant Ministries," he told journalists Tuesday.

Touching upon the problem of Javakhk he said the issue wasn’t discussed
at the meeting. He also noted the construction of Javakhk-Batumi
highway will create infrastructure development potentials in the
Armenian-populated region.

*

The premiere of Sasna Tsrer full-length animated film took place in
Moscow Cinema, Yerevan, on January 25.

"It’s an important event for the Armenian nation. Sasna Tsrer features
Armenian colors, music and mentality. We finally have a screen version
of an Armenian epos," AFR Dashnaktsutyun member Artyusha Shahbazyan
told a PanARMENIAN.Net.

"This film is a work of professionals. And special credit should be
given to scriptwriter and director Arman Manaryan," he said.

*

Tekeyan Cultural Center in Yerevan hosted the presentation of
"Armenian Genocide" book today, January 27. The book was published
in 10 languages, including Turkish.

"My first book, dedicated to the Armenian Genocide, was published
in March 1965. For the past year, I worked at a number of problems
related to Middle East, Arabian world, Artsakh, yet I always touched
upon the issue of Genocide in some way or another," the author of
the book, RA National Academy member Nikolay Hovhannesyan said.

According to him, "Armenian Genocide" book differs from other
monographs on the subject. While working at the book, I was guided
by a principle "no whining". I attempted to narrate the most tragic
pages of our history and do it in a dignified manner. I believe I
managed to avoid the most common shortcoming of our historiography,"
he emphasized.

"My friend characterized this book as a strong message to Turkey,"
the author noted.

*

Shooting House, the first feature film in the history of Artsakh (NKR)
has been shot. It’s a 20-minute film based on the history of writer,
journalist and Karabakh war veteran Ashot Beglaryan. The film was shot
under the support of NKR Defense Ministry and Public Television of
Artsakh (financial sponsor: businessman Karen Baghdasarov). Starring
in the film is participant of Karabakh war Martin Aloyan, actor of
the Vahram Papazyan Drama Theatre.

*

Arto Chakmakchyan’s exhibition opened in UNESCO headquarters in
Paris on January 28. Renowned singer Charles Aznavour, RA Ambassador
to France Vigen Chitechyan, UNESCO Assistant Director-General for
Culture Francoise Riviere, cultural workers and representatives of
the Armenian community of France attended the opening ceremony.

The exhibition was organized on the initiative of French Embassy in
Armenia and RA delegation to UNESCO, under the auspices of Calouste
Gulbenkian and AGBU Europe.

*

Film director Roger Kupelian shared ideas about the film about Vartan
Mamikonian.

"The idea to shoot a film about Vartan Mamikonian was born quite early
on. I was taught the poems of Vartan when I was quite young. It was
in New Zealand, during my work on the Lord of the Rings Trilogy,
that I was able to meet some of the artisans that were able to
help facilitate shooting the first few trailers. The name "East of
Byzantium" was not the original name, as that was arrived on after
consulting with producers here about having a project with wider
appeal. Don’t be surprised if it changes again. We’ve been through
years of development and research on many levels and it’s just a fact
that it has allowed the project to really mature and hone down to the
importance of its central story," he told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

"We’ve approached many smaller studios and agencies but until all
the pieces are in place it is best to keep your powder dry. As you
know Hollywood is going through a particularly tough time so getting
such a high budget film greenlit takes time. We are in the process of
attaching executive producers who will take this to the next level,"
Kupelian said.

Asked why the Avarayr Battle was chosen to be the film plot, he said,
"The short answer is: Filmmaker’s discretion. And now for the long
answer: Keep in mind that the further you step out of Armenia, the
less the Diaspora usually knows about anything dealing with Armenian
history or at least of the region. Many people are very familiar with
this story more than many others, however. After the Genocide it is
one of the most widely known."

"This story is not about a ‘battle’ any more than Braveheart was about
one particular battle. It’s about characters, and these characters
symbolize the spectrum of challenges the Diaspora and homeland are
dealing with today. At the end of the day the decision was purely an
emotional one: If you don’t believe in your story and the importance
of telling it, this very difficult path is not worth being on. You
will face many challenges, many of them from within your own cultural
circle. To outsiders it is an exciting story similar to Gladiator. To
us it is fraught with political questions and inside squabbles. There
has to be a distance at some point when deciding to tell a story for
a wider audience," Kupelian said.

NKR: President Of The Artsakh Republic Signed A Decree

PRESIDENT OF THE ARTSAKH REPUBLIC SIGNED A DECREE

Azat Artsakh Newspaper NKR
February 05, 2010

On 5 February President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan signed
a decree on assigning May 23, 2010 as the date of elections to the
NKR National Assembly. According to another decree of the President
for productive and conscientious work and in connection with the 50th
birthday NKR permanent representative to the Russian Federation Albert
Andryan was awarded the "Gratitude" medal.

.

Lawyers Of Vahagn Chakhalian Intend To Appeal To European Court Of H

LAWYERS OF VAHAGN CHAKHALIAN INTEND TO APPEAL TO EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Noyan Tapan
Feb 5, 2010

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 5, NOYAN TAPAN. The lawyers of Vahagn Chakhalian – a
Javakheti Armenian political activist sentenced by Georgian authorities
to 10 years’ imprisonment for his political views – intend to appeal
against his sentence to the European Court of Human Rights.

Coordinator of Yerkir NGO Robert Tatoyan announced this at the February
4 press conference, adding that they have no expectation from the
Georgian justice. In his words, if this issue receives publicity in
Europe, no doubt the European Court of Human Rights will decide for
V. Chakhalian.

Lawyer Stepan Oskanian pointed out the unbearable conditions in the
prison where V. Chakhalian is kept: in particular, the inmates is
deprived of the opportunity to get any information and are isolated
from the outside world, even their lawyers cannot see them.

To recap, on 21 July 2008 V. Chakhalian was arrested and a year later
a first instance court sentenced him to 10 years’ imprisonment.

BAKU: Turkey Heightens Pressure On Armenia After Court Ruling

TURKEY HEIGHTENS PRESSURE ON ARMENIA AFTER COURT RULING

AzerNews Weekly
Feb 4 2010
Azerbaijan

Turkey has moved to ratchet up diplomatic pressure on Armenia after
the top Armenian court enacted a ruling last month on the 2009
agreement on normalizing bilateral relations that Ankara labeled as
unfair. Turkish Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Feridun Sinirlioglu
is scheduled to hold talks on Thursday with officials of Switzerland,
which is brokering the process of reconciling the two neighbors,
who face decades of hostility, Turkey’s Hurriyet newspaper reported.

In a meeting with the Swiss State Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Michael
Ambuhl, Sinirlioglu will reiterate Turkey’s concern over the fact that
the Armenian Constitutional Court’s January 12 ruling contains points
that are inconsistent with the protocols on mending ties signed with
Armenia on October 10, 2009 in Zurich. The Turkish official will warn
that his country will bring an end to the normalization process if
Yerevan fails to honor its commitments reflected in the documents.

Ambuhl is considered one of the "architects" of the closed-door
meetings launched by Turkey and Armenia on July 8, 2008.

The Armenian court had ruled that the protocols signed in Zurich were
in line with the introductory part of the country’s Constitution and
the declaration of independence. The declaration of independence,
however, levels territorial claims against Turkey and calls the
neighboring country’s eastern provinces "Western Armenia". Moreover,
the declaration says achieving international recognition of the alleged
World War I-era mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire is
a task facing the Armenian government. The Turkish government has
criticized the ruling, saying it contained pre-conditions that run
counter to the premise of the reconciliation accord.

The Turkish media said that, initially, Ankara intends to put
diplomatic pressure on Yerevan by means of negotiations. Afterwards,
a legal document will be submitted to the interested parties.

Following talks with Swiss officials, Turkish diplomats are expected
to hold meetings with representatives of the U.S., Russia and France,
which facilitated the signing of the Turkish-Armenian protocols.

The protocols, signed in Zurich by Turkey, Azerbaijan’s ally, and
Armenia, with whom Azerbaijan faces a long-standing conflict over Upper
(Nagorno) Garabagh, seek to establish diplomatic relations and reopen
the two countries’ sealed borders. The move was an attempt to break
the ice in normalizing Ankara-Yerevan relations, marred by decades
of hostility due to Armenian occupation of Azerbaijani territory and
Yerevan’s claims on 1915 "genocide".*

Research On Nuclear Physics Reported By S. Khudaverdyan Et Al

RESEARCH ON NUCLEAR PHYSICS REPORTED BY S. KHUDAVERDYAN ET AL

Science Letter
January 26, 2010

According to recent research from Yerevan, Armenia, "We report a new
optical sensor exploiting the innovative operation principle developed
for the selective registration of UV and visible radiations. The
operation is based on the mutual influence of depletion regions in the
photovoltaic structure composed by Schottky barrier and n-p junction."

"The important feature of this structure is that the depletion regions
expand over the whole base so that they contact each other. We have
shown that the position of the contact point in the base is a function
of voltage applied to the structure. Also absorption spectrum for each
of the depletion regions and the photoresponse of the structure are
functions of the applied voltage," wrote S. Khudaverdyan and colleagues
(see also Nuclear Physics).

The researchers concluded: "We have revealed that the change induced by
the applied voltage in the photoresponse, Delta I, is proportional to
the change Delta lambda induced in the spectrum, Delta lambda-Delta
I. This linear correlation between Delta I and Delta lambda is a
very important spectrophotometric property required for the precise
selective registration of bio signals in dynamic and static biological
processes."

Khudaverdyan and colleagues published their study in Nuclear
Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section a – Accelerators
Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment (On the mechanism
of spectral selective sensitivity of photonic biosensors. Nuclear
Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section a – Accelerators
Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2009;610(1):314-316).

For additional information, contact S. Khudaverdyan, State Engineering
University Armenia, 105 Teryan Str, Yerevan 0009, Armenia.

Publisher contact information for the journal Nuclear Instruments &
Methods in Physics Research Section a – Accelerators Spectrometers
Detectors and Associated Equipment is: Elsevier Science BV, PO Box 211,
1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Boxing: Darchinyan Lashes Out At Donaire

DARCHINYAN LASHES OUT AT DONAIRE
By Ray Wheatley — World of Boxing

Fight News

Feb 4 2010

"I made you and I will break you"

WBA/WBC super flyweight champion Vic Darchinyan is after a rematch
with Nonito Donaire, the current WBA interim super flyweight champion.

Donaire, who holds a KO win over the hard-punching Australian-based
Armenian, and will defend his belt against Gerson Guerrero on a
February 13 pay-per-view card in Las Vegas.

"Donaire needs to stand up and fight someone who can actually throw
some punches back at him," stated Darchinyan. "Since he fought me,
who has he fought? Bums that either shouldn’t be boxing or should be
retired. I am praying he wins his next fight and comes through with
no injuries, I don’t want him making excuses when I finish his career.

Don’t go looking for Arce and make that a excuse of why won’t fight
me. Get through your next fight and it’s me and you, anytime, anywhere.

He continued, "Stop running and saying there were rematch clauses
and you wanted to fight me. I would have fought you the next day if
I had my way. The people around you care about your career they know
if you fight me you will be knocked out. Now you’re fighting junior
flyweights and you think you’re a champion. Your opponents are hand
picked to make you look good. You’re a fraud and you’re fighting bums.

I promise I won’t make the same mistake again. I made you and I will
break you and expose you for the fraud that you really are."

http://www.fightnews.com/?p=36647

Developments Round Iran

DEVELOPMENTS ROUND IRAN
Sevak Sarukhanyan

"Noravank" Foundation
04 February 2010

At the end of 2009 the instability in Iran caused new demonstrations
and encounters. On December 16, taking advantage of the mass
arrangements connected with the Ashura, the supporters of the Iranian
opposition went out to the manifestations. And the death of ayatollah
Montazeri on December 20 who took opposition stance to the current
spiritual authorities and his funeral ceremony even more urged the
actions of the oppositionists.

The preparedness of the anti-governmental manifestations The
manifestations and encounters which took place in December and January
came to prove the actions of the Iranian opposition were rather well
prepared. The protests which seemed to be spontaneous at first sight
and which passed in almost all the big Iranian cities, undoubtedly,
were arranged from one common centre which is proved by the similar
slogans, the political posters of the same style and methods of the
anti-governmental actions going on in different cities.

Besides the opposition managed to provide the regular provision of
information about the future protests, encounters and victims in
the leading Western mass media, their spreading on the Internet,
particularly through the social networks. As a result the opposition
succeeded in avoiding information blockade, which, most probably,
was arranged not without the help of the third parties.

As for the Iranian authorities they had also been prepared to the
manifestations and encounters. Probably, the arrests which had taken
place for the recent months, tough interrogations during which even
deaths occurred, formed good information base for the Iranian special
services and, as a result, on the very next day of the manifestations
police and security structures carried out arrests of the most
active young oppositionist leaders at their homes thus avoiding more
inconvenient street actions and greater number of victims.

While observing the way the Iranian opposition acts, one can suppose
that it was formed on the following creed: the manifestation may have
a success and force authorities to make serious concessions. Such a
supposition can be made on the assumption of the fact that opposition
leaders M.H. Mousavi, M. Khatami and M. Karubi supported and joined
the demonstrators from the very first day though during the previous
months they had demonstrated rather prudent and careful conduct. The
relatives of Mousavi and Karubi were also actively involved in the
arrangement of the demonstrations. The nephew of the first one was
killed during the encounters. At the same time it should be mentioned
that during the last months M. Mousavi and M. Karubi visited Iranian
regions, most probably, in order to prepare the local active circles
to the coming manifestations.

Most probably, the leaders of the opposition believed that the
organizational works carried out by them for the recent months,
propaganda, the violence used against oppositionists in the Iranian
prisons, which factuality had already been accepted by the authorities,
would boost the tide of public discontent.

Though, despite this and really large-scale manifestations no public
burst took place in the Islamic republic. Putting aside the information
repercussions with which another manifestations stage of the Iranian
political crisis was presented to the international community, the
plans of the Iranian opposition, in our opinion, failed. It can be
expected that the Iranian opposition will try to arrange big protest
actions in spring, during Novruz celebrations and, probably, in summer
at the anniversary of the presidential elections.

Those actions will be necessary to maintain the opposition movement
till 2010 and 2011, when, respectively, the new local authorities’
elections and parliamentary elections will take place.

Steps made by the authorities The Iranian authorities took rather
composed stance during the recent developments. The spiritual leader
of Iran Khamenei made no statement on the days of the encounters.

Only on January 10, during his address in Ghom he made important
statements, three of which were the basic:

Everything was arranged from abroad, the authorities will continue
responding the same way to the unlawful actions using all the available
means, none of the opposition’s suggestions would be regarded and the
political crisis will be solved in the way the authorities had chosen.

That way implies "accord with the will of the people, abiding to the
law and the respect to your own history".

The address of Khamenei was more than confident. It is remarkable that
Iranian leader did not even pronounce the names of the main leaders of
the opposition, leaving without the answer their "offer to the dialogue
and overcoming of the crisis", which implied the arrangement of the
new presidential elections. Mousavi’s offer was only keenly criticized
by the speaker of the parliament A. Larijani who characterized it as
"an obvious step, which proves the irresponsibility and evasion of
the dialogue". Iranian mass media presented the whole process as
a plot arranged by the powers from abroad and characterized a part
of those who deceased during the encounters as "the fighters of the
terrorist organizations".

In January yet another important event took place in the domestic
political live of Iran: the commander of the Islamic Revolution
Guards Corps (IRGC) M.A. Jaafari touched on in details and gave
his estimations.

It should be mentioned that after the end of the Iranian-Iraqi war
the then president of Iran A.A. Hashemi-Rafsanjani persuaded Iranian
elite that IRGC should stay away from domestic political processes
and not to make statements of political character.

In M. Ahmadinejad’s time who is supposed to be the representative
of the IRGC interests the situation formed at the end of the 80s
has started to change. And on January 13, 2010 the commander of the
IRGC made the statement of purely domestic political character, not
failing to sound harsh estimates concerning the going on processes:
"the main aim of the ongoing processes is to weaken the positions of
the spiritual leader and to turn his power into simply ceremonial which
contradicts to the Islamic nature of our country /…/ Our enemies want
to arrange here velvet revolution, want to impact out authorities and
first of all the spiritual leader /…/, the fact that a part of our
elite has retreated from the values of the revolution is not a new
one. But today our enemies spread doubt and distrust among our people
using that very persons who were involved before ahead by their local
and foreign spies into the economic and political treason. /…/ M.

Khatami intended to overthrow M. Ahmadinejad in order to strike a
blow to the Leader. That will not happen."

The fact that the IRGC became one of the most important actors in
Iran may show that the power is concentrated in hands of radical
conservatives. The continuing arrests, terrorist acts, persecutions
will only bring to the centralization of the political power in
the hands of power structures, which should be used during the most
important event in the political life of Iran – the election of the
new spiritual leader. The most crucial question for Iran is who will
be the next leader of the country after Khamenei.

It should be mentioned that during the recent developments the
oppositionist deputies of the Iranian parliament made more restrained
statements regarding the ongoing processes and encounters, this,
probably, was a result of pressure the authorities imposed on the
representatives of the political powers. The arrests of several of the
oppositionist figures had a restrictive effect on the political powers.

Estimating the political situation in Iran, it can be called a
political crisis without doubt. But the developments in October and
January have come to prove that the actions on the streets and mass
protests cannot solve the complicated discrepancies of the authorities.

Other issues of author

IRAN: YEAR IN REVIEW [28.12.2009] IRANIAN "THINK TANKS" [17.12.2009]
NEW STATUS OF THE IRANIAN NUCLEAR PROGRAMME [02.11.2009] DEVELOPMENTS
ROUND THE NUCLEAR PROGRAMME OF IRAN [12.10.2009] "NABUCCO" GAS PIPELINE
AND ARMENIA [21.07.2009] PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN IRAN [09.07.2009]
ON REGIONAL ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS [18.06.2009]

Exclusive: Review: Glenn Beck Documentary, ‘The Revolutionary Holoca

EXCLUSIVE: REVIEW: GLENN BECK DOCUMENTARY, ‘THE REVOLUTIONARY HOLOCAUST’
C. Austin Burrell

Family Security Matters
February 3, 2010

Called "The Revolutionary Holocaust," it was technically and
professionally outstanding. It recorded over 4 million viewers,
the largest number ever recorded for a cable documentary in a
traditional news time slot. This documentary was intended to show
the monstrous human price of the liberal secular progressive movement
in the 20th century, stimulated by the works of Marx and Engels. It
was a staggering dismissal of the true control motives of liberal
secular progressives in the forms of the revolutions and governments
produced by Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Castro and Che and the 200 million
plus lives they took in unprecedented, wholesale murder to achieve
their political objectives.

The first effective point made in the presentation was that the word
liberal was co-opted by leftist radicals, in that the people who led
our revolution were self-described liberals in their time. Conversely,
the progressive movement that came out of the socialist thinking of
Marx and Engels needed credibility, and they took this word to their
breast to legitimize their existence.

In fact, as Beck demonstrated, beginning with Marx, progressives
were racist savages, whose face was first seen in this country with
President Wilson, a noted anti-Semite and race baiter who fully
believed in the extermination of "inferiors," without regard to race
or religious background. Wilson was the first truly offensive Eastern
Establishment Liberal who viciously opposed the right of women to vote,
among his offensive positions.

The true story of the agendas of hard left liberal secular progressives
was demonstrated by Lenin (who lived in Brooklyn under the name of
Leon Bronstein before returning to Russia) in the Russian Communist
Revolution of 1917. Some 40,000 active Communists successfully
mounted a revolution that took over a country of 100 million people
and stretched across eight time zones. How they did that is its own
story, but what they did after they seized control is the true story.

First under Lenin and then under the brutal dictator Stalin, the
Communists initiated programs of mass annihilation of anyone who stood
in their way, beginning with the slaughter of the White Russians, which
essentially wiped them out as a racial segment. The concentration on
the annihilation of White Russians extended into foreign countries,
with Stalin ordering the assassination of White Russians who had
escaped his net, the last of which was in 1952. He bragged of the
slaughter of 20 million White Russians later in his rule.

Next was Stalin’s collectivization of Russian farms, with a
particularly savage focus on the bread basket State of the Ukraine,
with its incredibly productive independent grain farmers, the
"Kulaks." In the year of 1932, to accelerate the collective farming
plan, Stalin simply chose starve to death 10 million Ukrainians to
death in an unprecedented slaughter to that date, so vicious it was
given a name, the "Holomador."

I heard these stories from children of Ukrainians lucky enough to
escape to the U.S., and from a second generation Ukrainian-Canadian
whose father lived through this nightmare as a child. This was the
same country whose nationals welcomed the arrival of German troops as
liberator in World War II, only to be slaughtered again in horrific
numbers, with some 5-8 million murdered.

In 1936, Stalin began the purges of the Russian military, killing
without mercy and all but wiping out the officer corps of the Russian
Army. In a little over two years, 5 million would die in Stalin’s
attempt to "freshen" and "cleanse" the Communist revolution. When he
was through, only one regimental commanding field grade officer was
said to have survived. But he didn’t stop there.

Stalin was an equal opportunity monster, killing anyone who blinked
at his political agenda and plans for a Soviet Socialist State. He
slaughtered millions of Armenians, his own fellow Georgians,
Turkestans, Poles, Kurds and millions more, some 60 million all told
before World War II started.

The commonalities between the German Nazis and the Russian Communists
were those of one mirroring the other. Both focused on racial slaughter
and discrimination. Goebbels and Molotov signed a mutual non-aggression
pact in 1938. At the same time, Hitler and Goebbels came together
with the need to distinguish their socialist agenda from that of
Stalin, settling on the persecution of Jews as a differentiating
factor. Shortly after signing this document, Germany and Russia invaded
Poland, splitting it down the middle and beginning the slaughter of
over 10 million Poles by the end of World War II.

To my mind, what we all must know is that this common theme of mass
genocides was shared by all socialist states in the nations controlled
by the Communists, Socialists, Nazis, and other Marxist-Lenin
revolutionaries. But an eerie proof of their common grounds pointed
out so effectively by Beck’s documentary came in their adaptation of
common symbols, political themes, posters, and colors, almost across
the board. German and Russian (and ultimately, Chinese) themes were
virtual mirrors of one another. There was a focus on their common
choice of Socialist Red Flags, on nearly identical posters supporting
their jingoism and racist attitudes, their uniforms, on political
speech themes on the superiority of socialism to capitalism, and much,
much more.

Between Hitler’s slaughter of the Jews, German Christians, and other
helpless minorities of his own and adjacent countries, Stalin’s
rolling murders of his own people down to his personal staff almost
every three years, and Mao’s Revolution, Great Leap Forward and 1967
Cultural Revolution, over 200 Million men, women and children were
murdered, starved, shot, hung, gassed and worked to death in the name
of Socialist Progressive Elitists.

There was more to this entire story, far more. The point of this
review was that I knew all of these stories for decades before this
ground-breaking piece of documentary film, and those stories have
never been so focused in concentrated form on the risks we face from
hard left liberal progressive socialist/communist elitists.

I thank my God that I was born and raised in the United States, rather
than any other country. Anyone who doesn’t feel that way should be
shown the door or offered other, less attractive options. Our country
was founded by a bunch of very bright, liberal, old white guys who
were both religious and terribly conscious of the role of history
in other experiments in governance means and methods. God bless them
and God bless all of us.

Make the time to see this documentary if you want this history
imprinted on your consciousness and that of your family. In a
democracy, every person, no matter how stupid or short-sighted, is
entitled to be as dumb and uninformed as he or she chooses. I beg
you choose not to be one of those uninformed.

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor C. Austin Burrell is
a corporate finance generalist with over 30 years of Wall Street
and related experience. He was a senior derivatives specialist and
development stage company investment banker for more than 35 years
on Wall Street.He is a 1968 Graduate of the U.S. Military Academy
and a graduate of the Army’s Finance Officer Advanced Course.

ArCa To Introduce American Express Payment Cards In Armenia

ARCA TO INTRODUCE AMERICAN EXPRESS PAYMENT CARDS IN ARMENIA

ARKA
Feb 3, 2010

YEREVAN, February 3, /ARKA/. Armenian Card (ArCa) Armenian payment
system said it will introduce this year American Express international
payment system’s cards.

American Express is one of the three largest international card
payment systems along with Visa and MasterCard, Armenian Card executive
director Shahen Hovhanesian, told in an interview with ARKA.

He said ArCa has received all necessary certificates and implemented
several pilot transactions planing to start issuing these cards in
the first half of 2010.

He said the introduction of the new payment system is expected to
increase the banks’ turnover which will receive additional profits
for servicing new cards, but declined to reveal the name of a bank
that has received a license to service these new cards

‘This bank has developed an appropriate business plan and has been
granted the exclusive contract to service American Express cards.

Under the contract all other banks will be serviced through it,’
he said.

In 2009 ArmCard system -member banks issued 190,346 cards. Also last
year 6.8 million transactions were executed by payment cards worth
over 331 billion drams.

Armenian Card was founded in 2000 and 20 of 22 Armenian commercial
banks are its members, which issue now ArCa Classic, ArCa Gold, ArCa
Business, ArCa Affinity, ArCa Co-branded, ArCa Debit E ArCa Platinum
cards. It is also a full member of MasterCard Europe, implementing the
processing of VISA cards (Third Party Processor). ($1 – 376.03 Drams).