Armenia celebrating Christmas

Armenia celebrating Christmas
06.01.2010 12:46 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Armenian Apostolic Church celebrates the Feast
of the Holy Nativity and Theophany of Our Lord Jesus Christ on January
6. Festivities begin on the evening of January 5 as the church day
changes at 17:00 pm, after the evening service. So the celebration of
the feast starts in the evening of January 5 and is continued on
January 6. In the evening of January 5 candlelight Divine Liturgy is
celebrated in all Armenian churches.

On January 6, the Christmas liturgy is followed by the ceremony of
consecration of water what symbolizes the Baptism of Christ in the
Jordan.

January 7, as well as all the days following the major church feasts
are memorial days (or days of Remembrance of the dead). On January 7
(and all memorial days) a special Repose of Souls Service is offered
in memory of the dead after which people go the graveyards to pay
visit to their relatives’ tombs.

The ceremonies related to the Feast of the Holy Nativity and Theophany
of Our Lord Jesus Christ are concluded on January 13, the Feast of
Naming of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

BAKU: Myths and phobias by Armenians: Reflection on "enemy image"

Today, Azerbaijan
Jan 6 2010

Myths and phobias by Armenians: Reflection on "enemy image"

06 January 2010 [12:58] – Today.Az

Remove or not remove? Today many people ask this question referring
to the "enemy image", rooted in the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict.
Some argue that by getting rid of phobias, the parties will easily
build confidence that will create a primary condition for peace in the
region. Others argue that conflict resolution is impossible without
any psychological change. Some intellectuals attribute the shuttle
visits that they make from time to time to a need to communicate while
more radical people cultivate phobia, insisting on impossibility of
living together.

Of course, both sides have certain phobias and complexes. It does not
matter where the horse will stand ` before or behind the cart. The
main thing is that this cart moves steadily in the right direction,
even if it does not pull, but pushes the horse. The issue of speed
becomes awkward after nearly 16 years of unsuccessful negotiations.

As a former presenter of the "Crossroads" TV program, I dealt with
this same "enemy image" for 9 years. I failed to remove it. I do not
believe it to be possible untill at least one square meter of the
occupied territories is liberated. I have quite peculiar experience,
and would like to share some thoughts.

Outside experts are right in their arguments that the
Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is full of various
myths. Each side is convinced of its absolute rightness and lie of the
enemy. It often reaches full absurd and marasmus. Participants of back
discussions believe that allegedly some elements give them even more
rights. In this case, let’s talk about the wrong track held by
Armenian "experts".

It is alleged that:

– "As Armenians are indigenous people, they have a historic right to
the territory of Azerbaijan, Turkey, Iran and Georgia."

In fact, they are viewing Dagestan and the North Caucasus, but in view
of special relations with Russia. No specific public statements are
made in this regard. In my humble understanding, to claim the
territory of neighboring states by defying the history (more than
doubtful, although it is not the decisive moment) is a blatant mockery
over the international law. If one revises borders of countries under
that principle, the world will clearly be different and wrong.
Exaltation of one nation over others is an ordinary fascism. In the
meantime, there is little prove to show who are indigenous people in
our region. Everyone has his/her own "truth".

– `Azerbaijanis, like Turks, have always killed Armenians, including
women and children.’

I will not argue about the "genocide of 1915′, let them to address
this issue with Turks amid `warming of relations." But people in
Azerbaijan have no doubt that in this period (+ / – a few years), the
carnage in Zangazur, Karabakh, Shamakhi, Baku, Guba and other cities
were committed by Armenians. There is enough evidence to prove it.

– "Armenians in Karabakh has always been oppressed and hated."

No "expert" brings intelligible evidence in this respect. In the
meantime, worsening of `the Karabakh issue" is primarily due to the
events of 1965, when Moscow, offended by Ankara, allowed Armenians to
organize the first demonstration over the notorious "genocide".
Another reason was that Azerbaijanis were also nominated to high-rank
state positions not in the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region,
but in the former Azerbaijan SSR in general after Heydar Aliyev came
to power. Armenian elite in Azerbaijani began `to rock the boat’
precisely after this.

– `Armenians were expelled from Nakhchivan.’

Yes, at present there is no Armenian there or their number is small
(unfortunately, the exact statistics of mixed marriages are not
available). But what about Azerbaijanis who once made up absolute
majority in Yerevan and minority in Armenia?

– `It was Azerbaijanis who first began the military conflict.’

This statement sounds unconvincing, because refugees from Qafan
[Armenian city] appeared earlier than other events occurred. Aside
from this, it was Armenians who shot two young Azerbaijanis in
Nagorno-Karabakh.

– "Armenians have a right to self-determination."

First, who said that this right is prevailing in international
relations? Secondly, Armenians have a country like Armenia where they
can determine their destiny. Thirdly, let someone first prove that
Armenians were able to fully self-determine in Armenia’s territory.
Fourthly, self-determination does not mean complete separation without
fail or annexation. Fifthly, why in this case Azerbaijanis deported
from Armenia are denied the same right?

– "Rights of national minorities is violated in Azerbaijan.’

Oh my Lord, Azerbaijan has these minorities at least, but what about
mono-nation Armenia? Maybe, they will still show Yezidi Kurds, who are
often commit self-immolation outside Armenian state authorities?

– `Azerbaijan possess nothing except oil and gas.’

This is a false position. Facts and figures clearly show that
Azerbaijan has everything plus oil and gas. No other way.

– "Azerbaijan does not respect human rights, therefore, Armenians will
not be able to live under Baku’s jurisdiction".

Is Armenia a cradle of democracy? Slaughter of March 1, 2008 revealed
essence of the regime in Yerevan while Azerbaijan `cannot boast such
events.’

– "Azerbaijan does not display constructive position constantly
threatening by resumption of hostilities."

Then does Armenia display such position by holding Azerbaijan’s
territory under occupation and dusting all the brains for almost 16
years? I propose an experiment – Armenians return Karabakh and in
addition we take away Zangazur region from them. Who will be more
aggressive?

The list of myths and phobias can become infinite. I am very far from
argueing that all ideas voiced in Azerbaijan are absolute. But there
is a great truth – the longer the negotiation process will last, the
more "falsehood" will appear. It is high time to put an end to the
conflict, because I do not think that living together is impossible.
The more hatred is cultivated, the more we will be ashamed to look
into each other’s eyes in the future.

Kanan Guluzade
Day.Az writer

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/analytics/58969.html

One On 1: Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau

NY1 , New York
Jan 5 2010

One On 1: Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau

For the first time in 35 years, Robert Morgenthau started a week
without the title of Manhattan District Attorney. After deciding last
year not to seek reelection, the now 90-year-old was officially
replaced Monday by Cyrus Vance Junior. NY1’s Budd Mishkin originally
filed the following "One On 1" report in 2003.

There are so many compelling topics to discuss in a conversation with
Robert Morgenthau: his nearly 30 years as Manhattan District Attorney;
his rich family history; service to his country in World War II; one
of the founding fathers of The Museum of Jewish Heritage; 40 years of
involvement with the Police Athletic League; and his love of apples on
his Dutchess County farm.

"I think people emphasize too much the smoothness of the apple, but
don’t think about how does this apple taste," Morgenthau says.

The Manhattan DA’s fondness for apples and all things farming is
legitimate. The picture on his office wall is not.

`There was an ad that Arnold Palmer did, so they just took my head and
put it on his body,’ he says.

It’s hard to imagine Robert Morgenthau as an apple farmer, yet this
city dweller has a love of farming. He’s known as the soft-spoken
district attorney whose office has tried some of New York’s highest
profile cases: Bernhard Goetz; Joel Steinberg; Robert Chambers; and
the Central Park jogger.

Morgenthau would not discuss the specifics of any of these cases. He
says he tells his staff that every case has to get their best effort,
because every case is important to the victim.

`The ones that you just say, Ã?What an outrage,’ there are other
outrageous cases out there,’ he says. `Don’t put too much focus on a
case that the media and public quite properly is interested in, and
neglect other cases where a life has been taken and are just as
important."

Robert Morgenthau has spent most of the last 40 years prosecuting
cases. He’s passionate about the law, and steadfast in his conviction
that no one is above it. He’s 84-years-old. Why does he still do it?
What’s the intrigue?

`You’ve got two kinds of criminals. You’ve got the bullies and the
greedy people,’ he says. `The bullies are the ones that like to hurt
people, and I don’t like bullies, and I don’t like greedy people, so
it’s still important."

Morgenthau was an attorney in private practice when President John F.
Kennedy appointed him U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New
York. Years later he ran for district attorney in Manhattan, and has
since been reelected seven times.

He says the job is always on his mind.

`You are always thinking about cases. You can’t get away from it,’
Morgenthau says. `Generally the two cases you worry about is, one, if
you got the wrong person, and two, if you’ve got the right person but
can you prove it."

Morgenthau’s office walls are like a history lesson from the second
half of the 20th century. But what is the only case to get a mention
amidst the historic and personal mementos?

`I keep it as a reminder that not everybody loves me,’ he says. `This
is written to me by the New York City Friends of Ferrets, and it ends
up by saying, Ã?You are a fraud and hypocrite. As far as I’m concerned,
the city would be a lot better off if you would kindly drop dead.’"

Robert Morgenthau learned the lessons of public service early on, from
his father, the Secretary of the Treasury under President Franklin
Roosevelt, and from his grandfather, who as U.S. Ambassador to Turkey
in 1915 was one of the first diplomats to report on the mass murder of
Armenians.

"My grandfather always used to say, Ã?I had to wait until I was 55 to
engage in public service. You have no such excuse,’" he says.

As a young man, Morgenthau got to know his father’s boss, FDR, who
lived near the family farm upstate.

`On Election Day he would always drive himself around Dutchess County
and my father would go with him," he says. "He used to come down a
couple times a year to the farm. I used to make mint juleps for the
president, as I got a little older. He liked my mint juleps."

In the summer of 1938, Morgenthau’s father took the family to Europe
for a vacation, but also to assess the growing storm in Nazi Germany
from across the border in Switzerland.

`I remember my brother saying, Ã?Bob and I would like to cross the
bridge into Germany and see the Black Forest,’ and my father said,
Ã?What in the world would you want to do that for?” he says. `[My
brother] said, Ã?Just so we can say we set foot in Germany.’ My father
said, Ã?You’re never going to want to say you set foot in Germany.”

Some 50 years later, Morgenthau would visit Germany to see his
grandfather’s hometown of Manheim, for one day.

The young Morgenthau enlisted in the U.S. Navy a year before Pearl Harbor.

`I was 20 when I enlisted, and I had to get my family to sign off,’ he
says. `My father didn’t hesitate one minute, but my mother had some
reservations. My father said, Ã?Where do I sign?”

Morgenthau served on ships in the Mediterranean and the Pacific,
attaining the final rank of lieutenant commander, earning a Bronze
Star and a Gold Star.

And as for so many Americans, the next five years would provide
memories and lessons that would last a lifetime.

"To survive in the combat situation, you had to be lucky,’ he says.
`The second ship I was on was torpedoed and sunk off Algiers, and I
was out there swimming in the water and I said, Ã?If I get out of this
I’m going to do something useful with my life.’ You just had to be
lucky to survive, and it had nothing to do with skill or heroism. It
had to do with whether the bomb you took aboard detonated or not."

Some of Morgenthau’s war experiences are part of a new exhibit at The
Museum of Jewish Heritage entitled "Ours To Fight For: American Jews
in the Second World War."

The exhibit includes the oral histories of soldiers who helped
liberate the concentration camps.

Morgenthau is well known for his opposition to capital punishment. If
he had been the prosecutor at the Nuremberg war trials, would he have
asked for the death penalty for Nazi war criminals?

`I’ve never believed philosophically in the death penalty,’ he says.
`It’s not up to the government to take a life of somebody else, it’s
up to the almighty. So I don’t think I would have sought the death
penalty, but I sure would have made every effort to lock these guys up
for the rest of their lives."

Morgenthau has been with the museum from the planning stages in the
early 1980’s to the opening in 1997, first as president, then
chairman, and he now has a wing named in his honor.

Like many veterans, he didn’t talk about the horrors he’d seen for
years, but now he’s encouraged others to come forward with their
stories so that future generations will learn from the past.

`This is an incredibly important thing to do to let our children, and
our children’s children and their children, know what happens when
criminals take over a government," he says. `Somebody said, Ã?The
opposite of love is not hate, the opposite of love is indifference.’
The problem leading up to World War II was there were too many people
who were indifferent, and we don’t want that to ever happen again.’

The divide between good and evil was clear to Morgenthau 60 years ago,
and it’s remained that way throughout his legal career. He’s seen
mankind at its worst in situations near and far.

`To be in my business, you’ve got to be an incorrigible optimist and
hope that things are going to be better,’ he says. `Why people have
done things in the past, I don’t know the answer."

/features/one_on_1/35433/-i-one-on-1—i–manhatta n-district-attorney-robert-morgenthau/

http://ny1.com/6-bronx-news-content

Grandmaster Zaytsev wins Veterans’ Quick Chess Tournament in Moscow

Armenian grandmaster Igor Zaytsev wins Veterans’ Quick Chess
Tournament in Moscow
26.12.2009 12:36 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian grandmaster Igor Zaytsev won Veterans’
Quick Chess Tournament in Moscow, which brought together 84
participants. Zaytsev gained 7.5 out of 9 maximal points.

Another Armenian grandmaster Avetik Grigoryan came third in a chess
tournament held in Urmia, Iran.

BAKU: Armenia Should Realize CSTO Is Not Panacea From All Problems W

ARMENIA SHOULD REALIZE CSTO IS NOT PANACEA FROM ALL PROBLEMS WITH NEIGHBORS

news.az
Dec 25 2009
Azerbaijan

The recent often statements of the Armenian side about the
unconditional protection of the Collective Security Treaty Organization
from all possible actions in Nagorno-Karabakh have caused, at least,
surprise.

Under the union contract with the Collective Security Treaty
Organization, in case of military actions against Armenia, the
Collective Security Treaty Organization is obliged to render military
assistance to Yerevan, Armenian Defense Minister Seyran Ohanian told
Yerevan’s "Azg" newspaper.

"This is the answer to the question whether the CSTO will help us
or not in the war with Azerbaijan, because we are members of this
organization as opposed to Azerbaijan," the minister said.

Nobody would argue that in case of an act of aggression against
Armenia, which is the CSTO member-country, the CSTO has the right to
render the necessary assistance, including military one under the right
to collective defense in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter .

However, it seems, the Armenian side misses one important point: the
military operations do not envisage Azerbaijan’s attack on Armenia
because Nagorno-Karabakh is not Armenia, but de jure territory
belonging to Azerbaijan. This fact can not be interpreted to meet
one’s interests, because there is no country in the world that would
recognize the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh and call the territorial
integrity of Azerbaijan in question.

Yerevan must understand that the entry of Armenia to the Organization
of Collective Security Treaty does not guarantee that members of the
organization will assist Yerevan in case of a military invasion of
Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh. Legally, the CSTO is not simply
entitled to do it, because Nagorno-Karabakh is a part of Azerbaijan.

It does not belong to any of the CSTO member countries. But Baku
is not going to announce the war to a member of the CSTO – Armenia,
for which the rest of the CSTO member-countries could protect.

Armenia took upon themselves obligations to protect Nagorno-Karabakh.

But up until today they have no received any international recognition
of independence. Indirectly the organization itself has attempted to
clarify this issue.

First, the Armenians should think that the CSTO has already rejected
the intention of its participation even in a peacekeeping operation
in the Karabakh conflict zone.

The CSTO stressed that the Nagorno-Karabakh is Azerbaijan’s territory.

"Azerbaijan is not included in the Collective Security Treaty
Organization. We can not enter our troops in Azerbaijan’s territory
without its consent. Our charter clearly stressed that the CSTO
has no right to conduct any military operations in one country’s
territory which is not the CSTO member without its consent", the CSTO
press-service said in July 2009.

If Yerevan hopes for the CSTO’s interference on the scenario of
events in Tskhinvali in 2008, when Russia entered its troops into the
territory of Georgia, a big question will occur. Is it possible to
compare the relations between Tbilisi and Moscow in August 2008 with
the relations between Baku and six CSTO member-states, except Armenia?

If Armenia, on behalf of the Nagorno Karabakh, applies to the
Collective Security Treaty Organization with a request on interference,
the CSTO member-countries are unlikely to ignore friendly relations
with Azerbaijan. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Belarus and
Uzbekistan are countries that traditionally consider Azerbaijan the
main partner and ally in the South Caucasus.

As to Armenia’s main hope – Russia, the alarming bell for Yerevan was
that after Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s statement in November
2009 about the possibility to solve the long-standing territorial
dispute militarily, there was no official comment from Russia.

One should think whether the scenario of the Armenian-Azerbaijani war
of early 1990 can repeat, and whether the influence of Russia in this
war will be decisive now. Probably, no! If Armenia does not ignore
many signals to establish a warm partnership and strategic relationship
between Russia and Azerbaijan, it will not cherish false hopes.

With regard to bilateral agreements between Russia and Armenia,
Russia’s border guards are obliged to protect only the external borders
of Armenia, that is, the borders of Armenia within the former Soviet
Union with Turkey and Iran.

In such a situation, it is impossible to expect for Russian military
men to deploy on the border with Azerbaijan, even if there is a threat
of further aggression against Armenia.

Armenia’s final hopes for the CSTO was that the Russian President,
as commander-in-chief, is entitled to personally decide where to
enter its troops under the new amendments to the law "Defense".

President Dmitry Medvedev became the initiator of the amendments.

Russia’s legislators gave him these powers.

Taking into account all the above-mentioned, Armenia should not rely
on the CSTO’s and Russia’s help in case of military operations in
Nagorno-Karabakh.

Armenia should search for diplomatic compromises in resolving the
problems with its neighbors.

Appointments In The Armenian Apostolic Church

APPOINTMENTS IN THE ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH

Aysor
Dec 25 2009
Armenia

By the order of His Holiness Garegin II, Supreme Patriarch and
Catholicos of All Armenians some of the church servicemen will
continue their spiritual service in different Diocese of Armenian
Apostolic Church.

Abgar Archimandrite Hovakimyan will make his service in the Armenian
Diocese of Canada.

Zaven Monk Yazichyan has been appointed in the Syunik Diocese, and
Khoren Monk Araqelyan in Armenian Greek Diocese.

Daniel Archimandrite Tumanyan was appointed to Sweden.

Priest Avetis Hambarzumyan was moved to the Armenian Diocese of
Australia and New Zeeland, and priest Hakob will continue his service
in Egypt, informs the information service of the Mother See of Holy
Etchmiadzin.

Azerbaijan – Shattered Hopes

AZERBAIJAN – SHATTERED HOPES

Panorama.am
14:21 25/12/2009

Armenian-Turkish signed protocols are supposed to be a success
for Yerevan, Valeri Dyodorov, the head of pan-Russian center on
studying public opinion, told Day.az. The expert said though Ankara,
having felt pressures upon itself by Azerbaijan, highly assesses the
relations with Azerbaijan, they try to play their game in the region
anyhow. Turkey is trying to act as mediator in conflicts of Middle
East and Caucasus, but it’s done not to make favor to Azerbaijan,
but to keep balance with its own interests. And the evidence is the
fact of signed protocols with Armenia.

Oligarchy Is The Threat

OLIGARCHY IS THE THREAT

Lragir.am
24/12/09

On December 24, summing up and assessing the year 2009, the
representative of the Armenian National Congress David Shahnazaryan
said the year did not bring any achievement to Armenia, instead
the economic decrease showed that the oligarchic system is one of
the threats to the Armenian national security. According to David
Shahnazaryan, the year showed that the transitional period in Armenia
finished and the dictatorial regime is firmed.

In the home life, according to David Shahnazaryan, persecution
of opposition is still going on and the government keeps showing
its face, the bright example of which is the trial against Nikol
Pashinyan. David Shahnazaryan does not see any positive thing in the
foreign political sphere and says the Armenian and Turkish process
has since the beginning been dead and it is over for everyone-
both Turkey and the international community and only the Armenian
government tries to find ways to soften the impact of its mistake. "The
Armenian government seems to have understood the consequence of its
adventurousness. I would rather say the consequence of its mistake
and a mistake in politics is a crime", says the HAK member.

At the same time though, David Shahnazaryan saying that the Armenian
and Turkish process and the Karabakh issue are one package, adds
that the international community in 2010 will enhance its pressure to
procure some progress in the Karabakh issue. He says the fact that the
OSCE Minsk group co-chairs visited Baku in December but not Armenia
proves that they do not have any question to discuss with Armenia.

Shahnazaryan says an agreement of frameworks may be not signed but
there may only be some arrangement moreover the OSCE practice supposes
for this. David Shahnazaryan cannot predict when exactly it will take
place saying that "it is a matter of months".

Armenian Opposition Has Nothing To Do Even In Economic Sphere

ARMENIAN OPPOSITION HAS NOTHING TO DO EVEN IN ECONOMIC SPHERE

PanARMENIAN.Net
24.12.2009 17:29 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Back in 2008, Heritage warned Armenian government
that the country might face deep crisis, member of the party’s managing
board Armen Martirosyan says.

After Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan’s taking office, the party was
hopeful he’d take certain steps towards developing the country’s
economy, he told a news conference in Yerevan.

"But the Prime Minister-proposed keynote vector bears declarative
character," Martirosyan said.

According to him, the elaboration of 2010 State Budget, clearly
showed that opposition has nothing to do either in economic or
political domain.

Turkish Editor Murder Shows Risk For Reporters: Group

TURKISH EDITOR MURDER SHOWS RISK FOR REPORTERS: GROUP

Reuters
Dec 21 2009

Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:07pm ESTISTANBUL (Reuters) – The murder of a Turkish
newspaper editor, gunned down in broad daylight as he walked to work,
shows the risks journalists still face there, Turkey’s journalism
association said on Monday.

Cihan Hayirsevener, editor of a regional newspaper in Bandirma
in northwest Turkey, was shot by an unidentified gunman on
Friday afternoon, in a scene reminiscent of the 2007 killing of
Turkish-Armenian writer Hrant Dink, murdered by an ultra-nationalist
on an Istanbul street.

"Journalists are neither safe nor free," said Zafer Atay,
secretary-general of the Turkish Journalists Association.

Hayirsevener was the first journalist since Dink to be killed for
what he wrote, Atay said, adding that the journalist had received
death threats after writing about the detention of people suspected
of corruption in a construction tender.

Press freedom in Turkey has come under renewed scrutiny since tension
rose last year between Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and the country’s
largest media group.

Dogan Yayin, which owns a series of prominent newspapers including
the daily Hurriyet and broadcaster CNN Turk, faces a record tax fine
of $3.3 billion in a case critics say is politically motivated.

The government denies this and says Dogan has acted like an opposition
party with its critical coverage. Erdogan had earlier urged his
supporters not to buy Dogan-owned newspapers.

EU aspirant Turkey has a history of limiting free speech, especially
on issues which continue to be seen in some quarters as a threat to
the modern Turkish republic.

The European Commission has urged Turkey to do more to protect
freedom of expression and the press. Discussion of the mass killings of
Armenians by Ottoman Turks in 1915 and political Islam are particularly
sensitive.