ANTELIAS: 2009 yearbook of "Hask" Armenological journal dedicated

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Director
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

2009 YEARBOOK OF "HASK" ARMENOLOGICAL JOURNAL IS DEDICATED TO ARMENIAN
CILICIA

This year’s issue is devoted to the proceedings of the International
Conference commemorating the 100th anniversary of massacres in Adana,
organized by His Holiness Aram I. The volume includes documents on the
geography, theology, culture, politics and military history of the period,
published in their original languages.

The Gulbenkian Foundation made the publication of this volume possible.

##
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the books
published in the Printing House of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer
to the web page of the Catholicosate,
The Cilician Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is
located in Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org/
http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org

"Indecisive" President, Clan Rivalries, Dominate Azeri Politics

"INDECISIVE" PRESIDENT, CLAN RIVALRIES, DOMINATE AZERI POLITICS

Transitions Online
Nov 23 2009
Czech Rep

Compared with Georgia and Armenia, where opposition demonstrations
and other destabilizing events happen relatively often, Azerbaijan
seems stable. The country saw the last turbulent moments in 2003,
when the authorities put down opposition protests staged after rigged
presidential elections. But the lack of visible signs of potential
destabilization in Azerbaijan is misleading.

Beliefs about Azerbaijan’s internal stability are based on the common
conviction that Aliev’s position is strong and that he sets the rules
and makes most important decisions independently, especially those
on foreign policy and the oil industry. That he is like his father,
Heidar, president from 1993 to 2003, a cunning and experienced player
whom officials simply feared.

But when speaking privately, Azerbaijani experts question the position
of Aliev Jr.

"Ilham is an indecisive man who fears contacts with journalists,
avoids speaking in public, and has a weakness for risk," commented a
well-known Azerbaijani political scientist speaking on condition of
anonymity. "He has proved during his first term in office that he is
a gifted and clever politician, but cannot equal his father as far
as political games are concerned."

Indeed, Ilham differs from his father in almost everything. He has a
different character, personal and political experience. Heidar was a
product of the KGB and the leader of a strong clan from Nakhichevan,
an Azeri exclave sandwiched between Iran and Armenia. By contrast,
Ilham studied at the prestigious Moscow University and has much closer
ties to Baku’s intellectual elite and the community of his Baku-born
wife, Mehriban, than to the people of Nakhichevan.

Perhaps the best measure of an autocrat’s power is his ability to
conduct political purges, to remove his predecessor’s people and
nominate his own. Turkmen President Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov’s purge
of the state administration following his rise to power after the death
of Saparmurat Niyazov is one example. Ilham has come close only once:
in November 2005, when he imprisoned two cabinet ministers, Farhad
Aliev and Ali Insanov. Nevertheless, most members of the old guard
kept their offices. Many commentators on the Azerbaijani political
scene claim that it is they, especially the chief of the president’s
administration, Ramiz Mekhtiev, and Interior Minister Ramil Usubov,
not the president, who rule from behind the scenes.

Adding to the president’s weakness is the growing dissatisfaction of
the elites with the rule of two clans: the Nakhichevan clan and one
that groups Azerbaijanis originally from Armenia (the so-called Eraz
– from the Russian phrase erevanskie azerbaidjantsy meaning Yerevan
Azerbaijanis), who have dominated the political life of Azerbaijan
and whose members hold almost all offices in the central and regional
administrations.

"The conflicts and tensions within the ruling elites, including those
between the Nakhichevanis and the Eraz, are another threat," said
Leyla Aliyeva of the Center for National and International Studies,
a pro-democracy think tank in Baku. "They are fueled by the rivalry
over the division of oil money."

The assassination of Deputy Defense Minister Rail Rzayev in February
could have been a signal that the rivalry is getting fierce, according
to many commentators. In early October General Prosecutor Zakir
Garalov said the general was probably killed by his subordinates.

Not the West, but Islam

Among the major threats to Azerbaijan’s internal stability are massive
corruption, nepotism, and the dependence of the economy on energy
resources. No country struggling with such problems can be considered
securely stable.

Few seem to notice the growing discontent in Azerbaijani society. But
based on dozens of conversations I had with political analysts and
ordinary people, I would say that many Azerbaijanis have lost their
belief in a better future. Common people often stress that they no
longer believe that they will share the profits from oil and gas
sales. They do not trust the government, perceiving its members as
"parasites" who care only for their own interest.

Tofiq, who has lived in Patamdart since 1993, when his family fled
the now-Armenian-occupied Zangilan region, is typical. "How can I
trust the government, which promises to recapture Karabakh from the
Armenians every year, but has so far done nothing to fulfill these
promises? Why are they lying? All they care about are their own
pockets, not ordinary people."

Azerbaijani society has been passive for years and has represented
no threat for the regime. But signs of change are there for those
who look.

"Unrest among young people is on the rise: they discuss, set up their
organizations, opposition websites, and blogs," said Hajizade, of the
FAR Center. "Baku’s walls are splattered with hundreds of belligerent
graffiti: from ‘Fuck Bush’ to ‘Allah Akbar.’ Leftist movements are
also gaining popularity."

The events that took place in Baku after a gunman killed between 13
and 30 people (the actual number remains undisclosed) at the State
Oil Academy on 30 April [2009] were another measure of the growing
dissatisfaction. After the attack people expected the government to
announce national mourning and disclose detailed information about
the results of the investigation. Meanwhile, the government tried
to cover up the incident and did not even call off the Holiday of
Flowers on 10 May, Heidar Aliev’s birthday. In response, students
organized a street march that attracted more than 2,000 people and
was dispersed by the police. Possibly fearing that protests might
continue, the authorities called off all events planned to celebrate
the end of the academic year.

The growing influence of Islam, including its radical versions,
could also help destabilize the internal situation. As recently
as a few years ago everyone would stare at a woman dressed in a
hijab, whereas today there are so many that nobody seems to pay
attention. On Fridays, the Baku mosques fill up, unthinkable only
a few years ago in this strongly secular society. And the city was
the site of demonstrations in support of the Palestinians during the
recent conflict in the Gaza Strip.

"Only Islam can save Azerbaijan from the influence of the rotten West,"
said Mukhtar, a student at the State Oil Academy. "The role of Islam
in Azerbaijan’s public life should be stronger, and the government
should cooperate not only with the US, but also with Muslim countries."

That disillusionment with the West is a new phenomenon in Azerbaijan,
and it is getting stronger. Many Azerbaijanis perceive the West as a
cynical player that calls for democratization but values Azerbaijani
oil more. The West is also commonly perceived as supporting Aliev’s
authoritarian regime. Azerbaijani opposition politicians, advocacy
groups, and pro-Western elites criticize international organizations
and Western governments who they say are not sufficiently critical
of the government and who try not to let authoritarian practices and
human rights abuses impede relations with Baku. They often recall the
government’s violent suppression of the demonstrations against the
rigged presidential election of 2003. Although the West criticized
the government at the time, opposition and civil society activists
had hoped for a "color revolution" and looked on bitterly as Western
officials continued to do business with Aliev.

"The strongest criticism is directed toward the US, on whose support
everyone relied and counted only a few years ago," said Arif Yunusov
from the Institute for Peace and Democracy. "The Azerbaijanis do not
like the materialism and high-spending lifestyle of Western diplomats
and NGO workers living in Baku, who isolate themselves from the local
people, often even despise them. The policy of the West toward the
world of Islam and its insufficiently active stance in the Karabakh
conflict is also regarded with common disapproval."

In view of such an attitude toward the West and the common
disillusionment with Western values, assurances made by politicians
about the pro-Western course of the government sound barely credible.

"We’ll get by," said Jaga, opening another bottle of Xirdalan beer,
"if only things don’t get worse." But what if they do?

Nikoloz Vacheishvili: Urgent Works For St. Gevorg Of Mughni Church R

NIKOLOZ VACHEISHVILI: URGENT WORKS FOR ST. GEVORG OF MUGHNI CHURCH REINFORCEMENT LAUNCHED

PanARMENIAN.Net
25.11.2009 15:20 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian Culture Ministry restoration architect
will depart Thursday for Tbilisi to participate in reconstruction of
broken-down St. Gevorg of Mughni Church is Tbilisi, the Ministry’s
press office told PanARMENIAN.Net.

An invitation followed RA Minister of Culture Hasmik Poghosyan’s
address to her Georgian counterpart.

As Nikoloz Vacheishvili, Georgia’s cultural heritage preservation
agency director, informed RA Deputy Culture Minister Arev Samuelyan,
urgent works for St. Gevorg of Mughni Church reinforcement were
launched on November 25.

After the break-down of St. Gevorg of Mughni, Armenian Apostolic
Church accused Georgian authorities of indifference to preservation
of Armenian relics.

BAKU: Europe And Turkey Will Only Have Themselves To Blame If EU Los

EUROPE AND TURKEY WILL ONLY HAVE THEMSELVES TO BLAME IF EU LOSES ACCESS TO CASPIAN GAS
By Alexander Jackson

APA

Nov 24 2009
Azerbaijan

For all the talk of Turkey moving away from Europe, the real story
of a Western ally slowly turning East has been ignored. In recent
weeks Azerbaijan has undertaken a series of moves which could, in the
long term, lead to the loss of EU access to Caspian gas and a major
reorientation in the region’s geopolitics.

If this occurs then Europe and Turkey will only have themselves to
blame. Europe has repeatedly failed to make progress on the Nabucco
project, which would carry Caspian and Middle Eastern gas to the heart
of Europe and partially liberate it from reliance on Russian gas. This
hugely expensive and ambitious project required firm political and
financial commitments which Brussels has not delivered. Instead,
individual European governments have been successfully courted by
Russia’s Gazprom for its rival South Stream pipeline under the Black
Sea. Turkey’s obstructionism and failure to acknowledge the links
between energy and conflict-resolution in the region make it also
responsible.

The Nabucco problem has been one of demand – insufficient commitment
by the EU – but also one of supply. The only confirmed source of gas
is Azerbaijan. Other possible suppliers – Iran, Central Asia, Iraq,
and Egypt – have their own specific problems.

Now it looks as if even Azerbaijan is starting to slip away. In June,
Azerbaijan’s state energy company SOCAR signed a deal with Russia’s
Gazprom. The quantities involved (500 million cubic metres (mcm))
were insignificant, but this was a warning shot to Brussels and Ankara
to hurry up with Nabucco. In November Baku has upped the stakes by
making some serious overtures elsewhere.

Firstly, SOCAR signed a deal with Iran, promising over 500mcm a year
from 2010 (Press TV, November 12). Like the Gazprom deal, this is
another placeholder, since the amounts involved are negligible. The
significance is political: the agreement holds open the possibility
of increasing the contracted amount in years to come. Iran is also
a pariah in the West, and expanding energy ties with it is a clear
message from Baku. Secondly, Azerbaijan agreed to ship 7 to 8 billion
cubic meters (bcm) of its gas annually via tankers in a compressed form
to Bulgaria, bypassing Turkey (Eurasia Daily Monitor, November 16).

Shortly afterwards, Baku made its bluntest threat yet. "If Europe
takes too long putting together a solution, then all the gas in the
Caspian will go to Asia," said a SOCAR official. "It’s more serious
than it seems" (Bloomberg, November 19). China – which has been
hungrily expanding its energy presence in Central Asia recently –
is the obvious target market. Currently, the infrastructure to send
Azerbaijani gas to China does not exist. But SOCAR’s threat seems to
be genuine.

Ironically, the main obstacle to Azerbaijani gas heading east is also
the main obstacle to Nabucco. A Trans-Caspian Pipeline (TCP) between
Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan, long in the planning, is still far from
being built. Russian and Iranian objections are partly responsible;
so is a recent dispute between Ashgabat and Baku over the ownership
of disputed gas fields. Turkmenistan has even threatened to take
Azerbaijan before a court of international arbitration.

Alarmed at the prospect of losing Turkmen gas for the foreseeable
future, the US has taken the unusual step of offering to mediate in
the dispute (APA, November 18). If the dispute is resolved and a TCP
is built, it may ultimately be used to send Azerbaijani gas east,
not Turkmen gas west.

Why the sudden activity by Baku? Partly, the moves are designed to
call Europe’s bluff and provoke it into action on Nabucco.

Unfortunately, Brussels doesn’t seem to have heard the message. The
timing of the moves, however, indicates at a deeper and more alarming
reason: growing disenchantment with Azerbaijan’s longstanding ally,
Turkey.

For years Ankara has obstructed Nabucco by insisting on preferential
price tariffs and a share of the allocated gas for its own domestic
market. Negotiations have continued for some time, and Baku was
willing to politely discuss the issue – up to a point. This changed
when Turkey’s government decided to press on with normalising relations
with Armenia, before any progress has been made on the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Turkey’s decision has been
widely viewed in Azerbaijan as a betrayal of the fraternal relationship
between the two countries, and prompted Baku to take an increasingly
tough stance on gas negotiations. Ankara needs Nabucco to fulfill its
goal of being a regional energy hub, and appears unwilling to back
down. Whilst previously the disagreement was largely commercial,
Baku’s fury over the ‘Armenian thaw’ has made the pricing dispute
extremely political.

There is a very real risk that the sense of inertia created by these
obstacles will finally kill off Nabucco’s prospects. Although a deal
with Turkey will almost certainly be struck in the end, the long-term
damage will have been done.

The implication could well be Azerbaijan’s gradual shift away from
the West’s geopolitical orbit. The role of oil and gas pipelines in
tying states together is sometimes overstated but, in the long run,
Baku could find itself closely linked with Moscow and Tehran through
commercial relationships. Oil and gas underpin Azerbaijan’s economy:
its energy ties inevitably influence its foreign policy.

As always in the Caspian region, business is politics. The tension
over Nabucco has been building for some time, but the immediate
trigger of Azerbaijan’s energy shift was the Turkish decision to
negotiate with Armenia without progress on Karabakh. Unless Ankara
alters its position, there is no reason to doubt that Azerbaijan’s
long-term gas strategy will change.

Policymakers in Brussels and in Washington should acknowledge the
dangers involved and commit themselves to resolving this situation
through serious, frank dialogue with Ankara and Baku. Failure to act
now will have severe consequences for energy security, and geopolitics,
in the long term.

www.cria-online.org

ANKARA: Tearing Down The Ankara Wall (In Slow-Motion)

TEARING DOWN THE ANKARA WALL (IN SLOW-MOTION)
Mustafa Akyol

Hurriyet Daily News
Nov 24 2009
Turkey

Twenty years ago, in November 1989, the Berlin Wall came down. It
took just a few weeks to tear it into pieces. It took only a little
more than that to disestablish the East German state apparatus. In
January 1990, the infamous Stasi, "The Ministry for State Security,"
was stormed by people who demanded the destruction of their "personal
files," and, ultimately, the end of communism.

Now, to get what is happening in Turkey these days, you need to
realize that there is an "Ankara Wall" as well, but a less visible
one. A revolution is taking place to tear this wall down, too, but
it is a much slower and erratic one. Moreover, the main actors in
this slow-motion revolution are Turkey’s religious conservatives,
who, with their moustaches and headscarves, don’t look to Western
eyes as familiar as the beer-toasting Germans of 1989.

The birth of the hybrid system

To get the story correctly, one needs to understand the beginnings
correctly. In the late 1920s and 30s, Turkey was constructed as
a "republic," but not as a democracy. The leader, Mustafa Kemal
Ataturk, was a passionate Westernizer, but the West was not an
entirely pretty place at the time. Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany,
along with the Soviet Union, were seen as successful models, and the
Kemalist regime did not hesitate to incorporate some of the elements
of these totalitarian regimes.

Recep Peker, the powerful secretary-general of the Republican People’s
Party, or CHP – Mustafa Kemal’s party – traveled to Nazi Germany in
1935 and came back with not just a deep sense of admiration, but also
a program to implement. A year later, Turkey was officially declared
a one-party state. Peker also formulated the famous "Six Arrows"
of the Kemalist ideology, which conspicuously excluded democracy,
liberty or liberalism. In fact, Peker publicly denounced liberalism
as "high treason." Besides the liberals, the two main enemies of
the regime were the religious conservatives who refused to evolve
into the ultra-secular "Homo Kemalicus," and the Kurds, who resisted
acknowledging that they were, according to Kemalism, "mountain Turks."

So, at the end of the 1930s, Turkey was just one of the several
totalitarian states in Eurasia. What would turn the country into a
unique case was World War II.

The war ended fascism, at least in Europe, and countries became either
Western-style liberal democracies, or Soviet-satellite tyrannies.

Turkey, which skipped the war by remaining neutral, became none. It
luckily joined the Western alliance, but it neither questioned its
inter-war totalitarianism, nor disestablished its infrastructure.

What emerged from this was a hybrid system: A quasi-democracy
existing side-by-side with a still-totalitarian state ideology
and establishment. Moreover, this establishment was supported by a
certain segment of society, mainly the urban upper class, who had
benefited from the era of High Kemalism, and identified itself with
the its ideals.

That’s why when military coups took place in Turkey against
democratically elected governments, especially in 1960 and 1997, the
culprit was not just the Kemalist military, but also its civilian
allies. Before the 1960 coup, some university professors and some
journalists openly called the Army "to duty," and cheered for the
junta when it imprisoned, abused and finally killed the elected the
prime minister. (This is something you should keep in mind when trying
to understand the current Ergenekon case.)

The AKP in perspective

What has been happening since 2002, when the Justice and Development
Party, or AKP, came to power, is that the hybrid system is slowly
falling down. For the first time, a democratically elected government
is assuming full power, and daring to change the Kemalist positions
on many critical issues – from Kurdish rights to the definition of
secularism, from a solution in Cyprus to the attitude toward Armenia.

It is not an accident that the AKP is widely supported by the three
main victims of the Kemalist era: the Kurds, the liberals and, of
course, religious conservatives. The latter’s leading role is also
not an accident.

As evidenced by the role of Catholicism in the fall of communism
in Poland, religions tend to provide the most durable resistance
to modern totalitarian ideologies. It is lucky for Turkey that this
religiously inspired resistance almost never turned violent, and, to
the surprise of most, it even has turned pro-Europe in the last decade.

But all this does not mean that the AKP is all wonderful. It is,
after all, a Turkish political party that grew within the country’s
decades-old patrimonial and nepotistic political culture. It abandoned
its old Islamist ideology, but the traces of the past sometimes still
surface. Its leader, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, is brave and reformist,
but also growingly intolerant towards criticism. (The recently levied
astronomic tax fine on the Dogan Media Group seems not unrelated to
that.) The AKP’s members have evolved a lot throughout the years,
but most are still far from being principled democrats.

So, foreigners would be not only right, but also helpful in criticizing
all these problems in the AKP. But they should be careful not to
support those who want to re-enact the Ankara Wall, and restore
something even worse than the old hybrid regime.

That’s a danger that is still clear and present.

NKR Independence Recognition To Become Nationwide Issue

NKR INDEPENDENCE RECOGNITION TO BECOME NATIONWIDE ISSUE

news.am
Nov 23 2009
Armenia

It is necessary to clarify the programs and solutions to the current
problems in NKR domestic policy and withstand the challenges to
its foreign policy, NKR NA Speaker and NKR Democratic Party leader
Ashot Ghulyan stated in the course of the regional visit of ARF
Dashnaktsutyun to Artsakh.

According to him, both ARF Dashnaktsutyun and other NKR political
forces face the mentioned issues.

The recent years’ experience and atmosphere of political accord
provides for an opportunity for joint problems’ solving, he outlined.

Social-economic programs will be in focus of 2010 parliamentary race,
Chairman of Free Homeland Party Arthur Tovmasyan said. Referring
to foreign policy objectives, he offered to leave the talks on
Karabakh conflict resolution up to the executive branch and make NKR
independence recognition a nationwide issue.

Chairman of ARFD Central Committee in Artsakh Davit Ishkhanyan
presented committee’s stance on vital domestic and foreign policy
issues and prospects.

Baku: Karabakh Conflict Influences European Security

KARABAKH CONFLICT INFLUENCES EUROPEAN SECURITY

news.az
Nov 23 2009
Azerbaijan

Andrew C. Kuchins News.Az interviews Andrew C. Kuchins, director and
senior fellow of the Russia and Eurasia Programme at the Centre for
Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

The Azerbaijani leadership thinks a resumption of the Karabakh war
is realistic. Do you think the threat of a new war is great?

A war between Azerbaijan and Armenia will become a direct threat to
European security. This became obvious especially after last year’s
war between Russia and Georgia. Therefore, though the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict seems to be of regional concern, its influence on European
security is undoubted, considering the importance of the region and
regional countries for Europe.

Baku accuses the European community of closing its eyes to the
Karabakh conflict. Do you agree with this position and, if so, what
is the reason for this indifference?

I understand the disappointment of the Azerbaijani party as the
conflict has not yet been settled, although more than 15 years have
already passed. But I can’t say the world community, in particular,
the West, does not do anything at all. They merely abstain from
direct intervention in this complicated problem. The main issue is
that the Armenians do not want to change the status quo. Moreover,
Russia is also involved in this matter.

What do you mean when you say "Russia is involved"?

I think Russia has no real interest in the settlement of this
conflict. And I do not agree with the statement voiced at the recent
Baku conference on security in the South Caucasus that there is
no difference between Washington and Moscow’s positions on the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

You mentioned the implications of war in Georgia. What conclusions
has the West drawn from this war?

Indeed, the war in Georgia was a wake-up call for most parties,
especially in the West that realized the threat of frozen conflicts.

This has become a stimulus for the settlement of similar problems. We
see more action, we see signs of advancement in conflict settlement.

You doubt the mediation role of Moscow, although the Moscow declaration
was the first document signed between Azerbaijan and Armenia throughout
the negotiation process and this was done in Moscow with the mediation
of President Medvedev.

This is merely a declaration.

Do you expect the resolution of the Karabakh conflict anytime soon?

I don’t think it will be settled next year. Perhaps, this will happen
in three to five years. It would depend on Russia’s understanding of
the importance of the resolution. But I do not think that key figures
in the Russian leadership think so.

Armenian Opposition Criticizes Next Year Budget

ARMENIAN OPPOSITION CRITICIZES NEXT YEAR BUDGET

ARKA
November 20, 2009
Yerevan

YEREVAN, November 20, /ARKA/. Armen Martirosian, a parliament member
from the opposition Zharangutyun (Heritage) party, lashed out today at
the draft 2010 budget saying it ignores a set of important questions.

He said his party would vote against it.

Speaking at a parliament briefing he said both spending and revenue
items of the budget as well as allocation of government funds must be
reconsidered. He added that the government had ignored the inflation
factor while drafting next year’s budget.

Ara Nranian from another opposition party-the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation (ARF)- said next year’s budget does not inspire optimism
because the living standards will be worsening due to the dwindling
money transfers from Russia and other countries from Armenian labor
migrants, stagnating salaries and social benefits.

As a result, he said, Armenian citizens will be spending less which
in turn would affect local producers.

According to Ara Nranian, the draft 2010 budget does not offer ways
how to improve the business environment and attract investments.

Heghine Bisharian from the Orinats Yerkir (Country of Law) coalition
partner, disagreed with both saying next year’s budget, despite the
limited resources, would ensure consistent implementation of all
projected programs.

Galust Sahakian, a deputy chairman of the governing Republican Party
and head of its parliamentary faction, singled out the social spending
item of the budget saying it will not be cut. He described it as
‘logical’ saying also revenues will start growing from H2, 2010.

According to the 2010 draft budget, the government plans to collect
676. 6 billion Drams of revenues, and spend 859.6 billion Drams. The
deficit is projected at 183 billion Drams and the GDP at 3.214 trillion
Drams. Armenia’s state debt is expected to hit $3.6 billion, economic
growth is projected at 1.2%. The deficit to GDP ration is projected
at 6%, down from 7.5% for 2009.

BAKU: Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Resolution And Turkey-Armenia Rappro

NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND TURKEY-ARMENIA RAPPROCHEMENT HAVE NO FORMAL RELATION: CE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS NEW CHAIRMAN

Trend
Nov 19 2009
Azerbaijan

There is no formal relation between resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict and Turkey-Armenia rapprochement, Committee of Ministers of
the Council of Europe Chairman and Swiss Foreign Minister Micheline
Calmy-Rey told Trend News today. Calmy-Rey was commenting on the
non-ratification of the Turkish-Armenian protocols.

The Turkish and Armenian foreign ministers Ahmet Davutoglu and Edward
Nalbandian signed the Ankara-Yerevan protocols in Zurich Oct. 10.

Turkey and Armenia in talks mediated by Switzerland reached an
agreement to launch "domestic political consultations" Aug. 31 to
sign the "Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations and
Protocol on the Development of Bilateral Relations," the Turkish
Foreign Ministry reported.

Diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey were broken due
to Armenian claims of an alleged genocide and its occupation of
Azerbaijani lands. Their border closed in 1993.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 surrounding districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. –
are currently holding the peace negotiations.

Following the signing of the protocols Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Erdogan said Turkey will not take steps contradicting Azerbaijan’s
interests.

Calmy-Rey also said the two countries should ratify the Turkish and
Armenian protocols in the rapprochement process.

"We hope both Turkey and Armenia will ratify the protocols soon," the
minister said, noting that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict resolution
and Turkey-Armenia rapprochement have no formal relation.

According to official, the processes are connected, yet independent
at the same time.

"The OSCE Minsk Group is engaged in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The
other process deals with the normalization of Turkey-Armenia relations
with Swiss mediation," she said.

The minister expressed hope in the prompt ratification of the
protocols.

"We hope the ratification process will be held soon. The processes
are not connected. Of course, progress on one issue will positively
impact the second affair," the minister added.

The chairmanship of Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers was
handed over from Slovenia to Switzerland Nov.18. After the ceremony,
Council of Europe Secretary General Thorbjorn Jagland, Slovenian
Foreign Minister Samuel Zbogar and new Council of Europe Committee of
Ministers Chairman Micheline Calmy-Rey held a joint press conference.

Armenians Publish Rostov-On-Don’s Earliest Papers

ARMENIANS PUBLISH ROSTOV-ON-DON’S EARLIEST PAPERS

Aysor
Nov 19 2009
Armenia

Rostov-on-Don’s history of papers and publishing business is directly
related to Armenians who came from Nakhichevan.

Here is the history of papers and their editors and publishers as
followed. Since 1891 S.Arutyunov (Arutyunyan) purchased a paper,
reedited it, renamed Priazovky kray, and published making it Russian
South’s most popular paper. Among its columnists was Anton P. Chekhov.

The well-known bibliophile O.Ter-Abrahamyan was editor-in-chief of
Donskaya Pchela paper and since late 19th century he also has published
Russian version of Russian-Armenian Don-Azov calendar which involved
annual directory and life histories of Armenian communities.

The equally popular in Rostov, Speech of Don Paper’s editor-in-chief
was M.Berberyan, a very respectable individual.

Meanwhile Armenians here dreamed to publish the own papers. So, a
well-known public figure, R. Patkanyan applied to St. Petersburg’s
Press General Directorate but was refused. Officials said cannot
allow publishing Armenian paper without censorship.

Eve so, Armenian papers were published. Early in 20th Century these
were Golub (Armenian Dashak Party’s paper), Novaya Zhizn (New Life),
Nash Golos (Our voice), Nashe Slovo (our Word), Pero (Feather),
Colonia, Armanskaya Obshina (Armenian Community). Later at soviet
times some other papers were published such as Bednota (The poor),
Putyem Lenina (Through Lelin’s Way), Serp I Mopot (Sickle and Hammer),
Shturm (Storm), Bolshevik.

These papers’ files are displayed in Surb Khach (St. Cross) Found of
Armenian-Russian Friendship, and now are exhibited in museums. The
great contribution to saving of this Armenian and Armenians’
press history belongs to honored teacher of Russia, well-known
historian A.G. Malkhasyan. Malkhasyan has also published a unique
Armenian-Russian phrasebook which involves dialect of Don’s Armenians.