ArmeniaNow – 04/14/2006

ARMENIANOW.COM
Administration Address: 26 Parpetsi St., No 9
Phone: +(374 1) 532422
Email: [email protected]
Internet:
Technical Assistance: (For technical assistance please contact Babken
Juharyan)
Email: [email protected]

LIFE IN PRISON FOR SAFAROV: HUNGARIAN COURT REACHES VERDICT FOR KILLER OF
MARGARYAN
By John Hughes
>From Internet news reports
Ramil Safarov, the Azerbaijani Army officer who admitted hacking to death
Armenian Army Lieutenant Gurgen Margaryan was sentenced to life in prison by a
court in Budapest, Hungary Thursday.
In handing down its sentence the district court said Safarov’s murder
was `premeditated, malicious and unusually cruel’. It is the harshest sentence
allowable by law in Hungary, where the death penalty was abolished in 1990.
Safarov, 29, was also found guilty of plotting to kill another Armenian
officer, although the plan was not carried out. He will be eligible for parole
in 30 years.
On February 19, 2004, Safarov attacked Margaryan while the victim was asleep
and, using an axe, mortally wounded the Armenian, nearly decapitating him.
“Compassion and remorse were completely missing from (Safarov’s) testimony,”
Judge Andras Vaskuti said, announcing the sentence. “During the whole case we
waited for him to be at least a bit sorry for the Armenian soldier he killed
brutally and for (Margaryan’s) family.”
The officers were participants in an English-language regional training
program, ironically titled `Partnership for Peace’, sponsored by NATO in the
Hungarian capital.
The killing enflamed smoldering anger between publics in Armenia and
Azerbaijan, bitter enemies since the late 1980s, when the Armenians in
Karabakh initiated a movement to secede from Azerbaijan in the Armenian-
populated Nagorno Karabakh. The enclave had been under Azeri rule since the
days of Josef Stalin. The countries have been in an uneasy ceasefire since
1994, after a four-year war.
Earlier this year passions were again stirred when an Azeri political party
named Safarov `Man of the Year’, sparking angry public demonstrations in
Armenia, and leading a fringe party leader to announce a bounty on Safarov’s
life, should he not receive the maximum sentence.
Safarov has said the murder was a revenge killing, carried out to avenge
losses his family suffered during the war.
During a statement in court Thursday, however, he denied that the killing was
premeditated, saying it was provoked because Margaryan had ridiculed and
insulted him during the training program.
“My conscience was clouded as a result of the insults and humiliating and
provoking behavior, and I lost all control,” Safarov told the court. “It would
not be correct to consider it as merely a premeditated act caused by the
awakening of revenge and hate upon seeing the Armenians.”
Safarov’s lawyer, Gyorgy Magyar, said he would appeal the verdict. He also
said it was not clear whether Safarov would serve the sentence in Hungary or
be extradited to Azerbaijan. (Republic of Armenia Ministry of Defense
representative Hayk Demoyan, who participated in the trial, told A1+ news
agency that Hungarian law stipulates that Safarov’s sentence be served in
Hungary.)
Margaryan family attorney Nazeli Vartanyan called the outcome `a good decision
for the Hungarian court and for Armenian society’.

ARMENIANOW EXCLUSIVE: FORMER COACH HENK WISMAN TALKS ABOUT DISPUTED CONTRACTS,
UNFIT PLAYERS AND THE SORRY STATE OF ARMENIAN FOOTBALL

By Suren Musayelyan
ArmeniaNow reporter

Editor’s Note: In the past four seasons, the Armenian National football team
has had four different head coaches. It has had as many coaches as victories
in that period. Henk Wisman, the latest to get the axe from the Armenian
Football Federation says officials are unrealistic in their approach to the
sport.

Wisman spoke exclusively with ArmeniaNow to give his assessment of the soccer
state of affairs.

Fired national football team coach Henk Wisman wants his contract with the
Armenian Football Federation respected and intends to stay in Armenia until
his deal expires or until his claims are satisfied.

The Dutchman was hired to coach Armenia’s national football team and football
club Pyunik last May, but was sacked last week. He claims he has three months
left on his contract. The Football Federation says it fired Wisman because of
his record of one win, one draw and six defeats over nearly a year. Meanwhile,
the 48-year-old Dutchman argues that he has been fired for his `realistic
approach to Armenian football.’

Originally Wisman had a 7-month plus 2 years contract with the Federation,
meaning that after seven months if both sides agreed he would sign a contract
to coach Armenia for two years. He says in late December, the Armenian
Federation proposed a two-year contract to him. But, according to him, he
asked for an intermediate contract until July 1, after which he would decide
on further extending his contracts.

`I said I needed half a year to make an evaluation, because I wanted a lot of
things in Armenian football professionalized, like players, accommodation,
medical equipment and facilities, clothes,’ Wisman said in an exclusive
interview with ArmeniaNow. `If no progress was made, I would then stop the
contract. And likewise the Federation could refuse to extend a contract with
me if they were unsatisfied with my work.’

Wisman says he has been paid for the first three month of the year and now,
after being sacked, he wants his salary for the remaining three months paid as
well. (Neither Wisman nor the federation would say how much the coach was
being paid. Football journalists speculate that the position pays anywhere
from $60,000-200,000.)

`It is normal that when a club or federation fires you they pay you till the
end of your contract. It is so in Holland,’ he says, adding that the
Federation broke the contract unilaterally. Meanwhile, the Federation says
that they have not received any claim either from Wisman or from the Dutch
Football Federation regarding the payment of the salary.

Federation spokesman Arayik Manukyan told ArmeniaNow that they had an
agreement after the seven months of Wisman’s contract expired that they would
make the decision about further extending it after the draw for Euro-2008,
which took place in January.

`As it was officially stated by the Federation, the contract with Henk Wisman
was not extended by the Federation president after they failed to come to
agreement during the negotiations,’ Manukyan said, without elaborating. He
said the Federation did not have any information regarding Wisman’s claims.

But now Wisman says it is a legal matter between the Armenian and Dutch
football associations.

Wisman, who played for Ajax for eight years and was involved in the Dutch U-18
and U-21 national teams, stopped playing football young to take up a coaching
career. He was hired by the Armenian Federation following the transfer of
Armenia’s young talented striker Edgar Manucharyan to FC Ajax (Amsterdam) as
the Armenian Federation then expressed a desire to hire a coach with Ajax
background.

Now he continues to attend football matches in Armenia, as a spectator,
pending a solution to his dispute with the Federation.

Meanwhile, the Federation is reportedly looking for another foreign coach to
succeed Wisman.

Wisman, who sounded optimistic about his future weeks ago in an interview with
, says the decision of the Football Federation was a surprise to
him.

`The only explanation that I heard was that players were not in physically
good shape. We became champions with Pyunik, we won the Super Cup, we
qualified for the semifinal in the CIS Cup in Moscow for the first time, while
opting out of the match with Azerbaijan’s champion Neftchi was not my
decision. It cannot be a reason to fire me.’

Regarding the national team, Wisman says that he has played the best possible
football with the set of players he had.

`Armenia does not have a strong national championship, there is no strong
competition in the country and most of the few players who play abroad are not
involved in strong leagues,’ Wisman says. `One should understand that not much
can be expected from a team that plays against competitors of a much higher
level and quality.’

Wisman says he wants Armenia to play the Dutch way, but as he says with the
given team he could not play offensive football against the strong national
teams like Holland, the Czech Republic, Romania in the latest WC-2006
qualifying round.

`But when I saw an opportunity for that, I played the team the Dutch way, such
as in the match against Andorra when we dominated the field and played very
attractive and spectacular football,’ he says. (Armenia beat Andorra away – 3-
0).

Wisman says the team accepted his tactics and he was satisfied with how the
players realized his designs on the pitch.

Armenia and Pyunik veteran defender and captain Sargis Hovsepyan, 33,
describes Wisman as a good specialist. `I am satisfied with the work with Henk
Wisman, with the trainings that he had with us, with the exercises and
tactical schemes he proposed. He tried to train us to play Dutch football, not
only running about the field with the ball, but also thinking. He had normal
relations with all players,’ he told ArmeniaNow.

Hovsepyan says Wisman was also satisfied with the way the team realized his
tactics on the pitch. `I agree that Armenia should play realistic football
now. You can’t play offensive football against Holland or other leading teams
if you don’t have a sufficient level,’ the veteran defender said.

`If the coach cannot achieve a result with lots of high-level footballers
playing in strong leagues, then he is to blame for the failure, but in my case
I didn’t have the required level of players to oppose strong European sides,’
Wisman explains.

`Edgar Manucharyan, who is now in Ajax, is a very talented player, but he has
been injured most of the time. Why? Because the Ajax level is too high for
him. The intensity and frequency of the trainings are high for him. His
physical fitness is not good enough for them at this moment. Maybe he will be
good enough for them in a year or two. I am sorry, but that’s the deference
between Holland and Armenia. It is a reality.’

Unlike his predecessor, French coach Bernard Casoni, who was fired for not
being `in touch’ with Armenian football, Wisman has stayed in Armenia on a
permanent basis.
He says he knows all players in Armenia and outside and knows their strong and
weak sides well enough.

Wisman says that there are a lot of conditions needed for Armenia to become a
strong football nation, like an improved economic situation, more investments
into football on all levels, a good level of the national championship and
players playing in strong foreign sides. Acknowledging Football Federation
President Ruben Hayrapetyan as a man who takes care of Armenian football
matters and tries to promote investments in this sport, Wisman says that above
all he wanted from him more time.

`The Federation president is doing a very good job for Armenia. But he must
be realistic and give more time and responsibility to the coach to work on it.
He shouldn’t expect a miracle to happen within a few months. I think it is too
much to change four foreign coaches in as many years,’ he says.

GAS AND HOT AIR: SELL OF ENERGY FACILITIES RAISES DEBATE

By Marianna Grigoryan

The decision by the Government of Armenia to sell off another section of a
thermal power plant and partial rights to the Iran-Armenia gas pipeline to
Russia as a barter for reduced gas prices has been called an `attempt to
prolong the incumbency’, `illogical’ and even `national treason’ in the wake
of last week’s announcement.

On April 5, President Robert Kocharyan told the public that gas prices would
increase by only 10-15 percent, rather than the expected 52 percent. The next
day, it was learned that a deal with Russia for Armenian energy facilities
paved the way for the reduction of prices. The latest agreement puts nearly
70 percent of Armenian energy in the hands of the Russians.

Officials in Armenia have not yet confirmed the pipeline deal, although the
Russian agency GazProm says it is completed.

Critics say the latest `property for debt’ agreement turns Armenia into
a `gubernia’ – a province of Russia.

`In this situation maintaining an energy ministry appears needless,’ says
renowned economist Eduard Aghajanov. `According to our authorities the more
energy structures we sell the more independent we are. The activities of the
authorities in the energy sphere defy logic.’

Aghajanov explains the problem is not the price of the power bloc but the
principle. He says a country shouldn’t sell almost all its energy resources to
a foreign country.

`There is nothing anti-Russian in my words,’ says the specialist. `I mean the
alternative; it is inadmissible to give all to one country. The energy
security of Armenia demands other players in our market. The challenge is that
Russia in fact owns not only the power production resources but also its
distribution structure. Russia can thus form a rigid structure that will
deprive Armenia of energy security.’

But while economists, political analysts and common citizens are likening the
sale to `selling the cow for the price of milk’, authorities say the deal is
favorable to Armenia.

`The deal was good business and was sold in a proper way,’ says the RA Prime
Minister Andranik Margaryan.

`The fifth bloc (of the power plant) is like a three-storied house with only
the basement built, and nothing else,’ says the RA Minister of Defense Serge
Sargsyan. `There are non-governmental groups and people who perceive the
word `Russia’ like a bull perceived the red color.’

Sargsyan says it was not practical to keep total control of the bloc.

`The bloc would cost at least $180 million. And the expenses would at best be
compensated in 10 years,’ he said. `That is, we would have an enterprise
working with profits in 2017 at best. What would be the profit? How much would
the gas price grow by that time, would there be profit or not, only
Nostradamus would say, what would happen in 11-12 years.’

Sargsyan says the Russian side had offered to buy the 5th bloc several years
ago, but the Armenian authorities have only recently accepted the offer.

`What do we need as a nation, as a state now? To sell something that does not
exist for $250 million now, or wait till 2017 when we may get very little,’
says Sargsyan.

But Aghajanov holds to his opinion.

`Gas is a geopolitical instrument for Russia that it uses to solve all of its
political problems,’ says the economist. `It’s not a new thing as Russia has
always had a policy of colonization.’

LOVE-HATE SONG: ARMENIA’S EUROVISION ENTRY CAUSES DEBATE AND THREATS

Gayane Abrahamyan
ArmeniaNow reporter

On May 18th and 20th Armenian pop singer Andre will appear before the European
TV viewing public under the Armenian flag at the Eurovision international song
competition in Athens. He will perform a song that has become the focus of
debate and even political speculation, even gaining discussion among
Parliament Members.

Critics say the song `Without Your Love’ does not represent Armenian music and
that it is in fact Arabic or Turkish and that Armenia is pandering to European
tastes by presenting such a song.

`If Europe loves it today we serve it, if it wishes Indian, we will write an
Indian one. Armenian is not in respect, forget it,’ says the Chairman of the
Union of Composers of Armenia Robert Amirkhanyan, then dismisses the song as
not being worth his criticism.

The music was written by the leader of the State Jazz Band of Armenia,
composer Armen Martirosyan, with instrumental arrangements by Ara Torosyan
(Murzik) and lyrics by Katrin Bekian.

`Yes, Europe is inclined towards Eastern (culture), but we are not the West
either,’ says arranger Torosyan. `Armenians have not heard their folk songs
for so long that they don’t differentiate between the Armenian and the
Turkish; this song is a compilation of the European and the Eastern, just as
we are between Europe and the East. Here there is no deviation from
ethnographic music and the Armenian tune.’

Other pop singers view the song as well-suited for the competition, which is
held annually. The winner is selected by means of phone and SMS messages and
the number of votes also decides the top ten countries to participate
automatically in the next year’s finals. One of the important preconditions is
that a country cannot vote for its own song.

`There is no need to make a scandal,’ says singer Shushan Petrosyan. `We have
numerous other reasons for talking about Arabic and Turkish motives in the
Armenian pop music; this is not the case, we just need to be willing and do
everything for Andre to win.’

Singer Aramo says he likes the instrumental arrangement of the song more than
the lyrics and the video. Aramo says the song does not fit Andre somehow, and
the East is embellished in the song, which is not typical to Armenian music.

But conductor Tigran Hekekyan says there is no need to present a piece of
national cultural value in such a festival. He describes the competition as
a `market’, adding that the best chance of winning is whatever `sells’.

Hekekyan also says that the debate over eastern influence in Armenian music
seems a little late.

`The song is not born occasionally, it’s the mirror of a whole cultural layer
and there is a need in discussing the problem of that layer existence and not
cling on one song,’ says Hekekyan.

Debate on the matter is useless, says the Chairman of the Board of the Public
Television Alexan Harutyunyan, since he is the one to decide the song and the
singer to be sent to the competition.

`This is the musical competition of the European broadcasters union and the
choice of the song to be presented is ascribed purely to us. I could make the
decision myself but I listened and took the opinion of the best musicians and
(popular music) authorities of the republic,’ says Harutyunyan.

And while Armenians are discussing the song, Azerbaijanis are flooding Andre
with threats. A month ago the Minister of Culture of Azerbaijan addressed a
letter to Eurovision protesting Andre’s participation, citing the fact that
the singer was born in `Nagorno Karabakh Republic’ an `occupied territory’ of
Azerbaijan.

The singer has even gotten death threats on Internet forum discussions.

`Nobody can kill me, they simply envy me,’ Andre told ArmeniaNow. `For me it
was more unpleasant at first to hear the criticism on the Armenian side, but I
don’t pay attention to them either. Let them not listen to my song if they
don’t like it.’

FAVORITES: ANB SAYS BBC AWARD `FOR ALL ARMENIANS’

Gayane Abrahamyan
Armenia Now reporter

Members of the Armenian Navy Band met with media Wednesday to say that winning
the `Audience Award’ of the BBC World Music competitions was `a victory for
all Armenians’.

Last Friday night in London, the group was named winner of the award,
described by BBC as `intended to reflect the musical popularity of different
groups across the whole spectrum of World Music and listeners voted online for
the group or artist they admired most.’

Group leader and founder Arto Tuncboyaciyan was called to London, where he
received the award from African musician and emcee of the ceremony Hugh
Masekela at the Brixton Academy Hall.

`Arto was invited to take part in the award ceremony but he didn’t know why he
was going – to receive the award or to return empty-handed, everything was
surprising,’ says ANB saxophone player Davit Nalchajyan.

The 12-member band was also nominated for Best Group from Europe, an award
that went to Fanfare Ciocarlia of Romania. Over the years, the Audience Award
has gone to such prominent performers Chronos Quartet and Cesaria Evora.

`For us it is very important that we got especially the Audience Award since
this is a true, sincere evaluation,’ says saxman Armen Hyusnunts.

`WEAK’ BUT NOT `FAILED’: AUSTRIAN SPECIALIST ASSESSES ARMENIA IN `CHANGING
WORLD’

By Vahan Ishkhanyan
ArmeniaNow reporter

A member of the National Defense Academy of Austria Martin Malek describes the
phenomenon of collapsed and weak states that emerged beginning in the second
half of the 20th century in his article `Collapse of States as a Phenomenon of
International Relations’. Several of the definitions of weak states fit
Armenia.

The article is published in an 825-page book `Armenia in a Transforming World’
by the Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS).

A presentation of the book took place on Wednesday at the center
().

The three parts of the book present analyses of Armenian experts dealing with
regional conflicts and solutions to energy problems, the revolutions in CIS
countries, Armenian-Russian economic relations, the Iranian nuclear problems.

Malek’s article is the only view from outside. He writes that unlike
historical states that disappeared because of military conquests, in the
modern world states are ruined from within. There are many countries whose
state institutions are so wrecked that their presence on the maps, in the UN
and other international organizations is only explained by the fact that
unlike previous times there are none willing to occupy them.

Malek defines Failed States with several characteristics (unformed,
collapsing, insolvent) – sovereignty (when public force centers and non-
governmental organizations gain part of sovereign rights), the quality of
democracy (states that play democracy), the lack of legitimacy of power,
security problems, control of territory and borders, efficiency of state
institutions, corruption, etc.

He writes: `In collapsing states at best the executive power works, and the
legislature, if it exists, is a tool in the hands of the executive
authorities. Democratic orders are very vague or are absent. The judicial
power is corrupted and depends on the executive, and because of that citizens
do not pin hopes on courts, especially in matters with the state.’ There are
countries where there is nothing left to collapse, for example in Afghanistan
and a number of third world countries. However, CIS countries are not among
them.

Malek classifies two of the republics of the South Caucasus among the failed
states: `Already for 15 years Georgia and Azerbaijan have not controlled parts
of their territories on which the monopoly of state power is not spread. For
this reason they are classified among failed states unlike Armenia, although
in this states a number of state institutions are weak, corruption is
thriving, the judicial power is ineffective.’

Collapsing and weak states become a threat for the West, as terrorist
organizations are formed in them, they become sources of disseminating drugs,
and refugees from these countries pour into Europe.

Malek says that there is no threat of terrorism from the countries of the
South Caucasus, the flow of refugees is insignificant. The only problem for
the West is that this territory has become a transit corridor for drugs from
Central Asia to Europe.

CRIME REVIEW: POLICE CONCERNED ABOUT INCREASE OF `HEAVY’ CRIMES
Arpi Harutyunyan
The latest report on crime by the Yerevan Police shows an increase this year
over last.
During the first three months of 2006, 1,098 crimes were committed in Yerevan,
an increase of 127 over the same period last year.
Police department head Nerses Nazarayan, however, says the increase can partly
be attributed to better record keeping.
Drug related crimes were among the growing number, as police made 80 arrests
for drug dealing and 309 for possession. Police confiscated more than two
kilograms of illegal drugs, though they would not specify what type.
Yerevan city law enforcement are particularly concerned that the number of
murders more than doubled during the time period. During the first three
months, the capital recorded 8 homicides, compared with three in the same time
last year.
Police say the number of home burglaries has increased from 57 to 110 during
the time period. Many, Nazaryan said, involved copied keys.
The Police Mashtots Division has recently arrested a criminal group of two
that has committed seven attacks using firearms (6 of the attacks were made in
recent years). Another criminal group of two apprehended by the Police Malatia
Division committed 116 robberies.
The Yerevan community of Arabkir has been noticed this year not only for
robbery, but for other types of thefts as well. Burlaries of basements have
become regular. In the last two months basements of four residents have been
robbed at Aram Khachatryan 10 in Arabkir community. The details of these four
robberies have not been yet disclosed.
Gagik Madoyan, Deputy Head of the Police Arabkir Division on Operative Issues,
also says the number of burglaries has grown in general. He says criminal
gangs from Georgia are partly to blame, for the upswing in crime.
TRADITION CHALLENGED: FEAR OF EGGS NOT LIKELY TO HAMPER ARMENIA’S EASTER
RITUALS

By Gayane Lazarian
ArmeniaNow reporter

Beginning in the middle of every March 75-year-old Shoghik Markosyan starts
collecting onion peels, for use in dying Easter eggs. It is an awaited and
special ritual for her. She carefully arranges dry onion peel in a copper
bowl, arranges the eggs, adds a spoonful of salt, then closes the lid and puts
the pot on a low fire.

This year, Shoghik feared there’d be no such tradition, due to concerns about
bird flu.

`I thought if that bird flu continued we would not dye eggs, but it is good
that passions started to calm down and they now speak less about this
disease,’ she says.

Like Shoghik all housewives throughout Armenia were worried, but not
contradicting the tradition of the festival many of them will dye eggs.

`How can one imagine Easter without eggs. My children can’t wait till that day
comes,’ says housewife Anahit Margaryan.

For many the ritual of dying eggs begins on the Thursday preceding the Easter
Sunday when according to tradition seven eggs must be already dyed in the
evening.

Shop assistant Marine Grigoryan says egg sales – by customers previously shy
of poultry products – have doubled since the beginning of the week. Her shop
is selling about 300 instead of usual 150 eggs a day. (The price of one egg
fluctuates between 40 and 60 drams, from 9-13 cents).

`They say, we’ll take them to catch bird flu, let’s see what it is,’ Marine
tells jokingly.

At Echmiadzin resident Vardan Abrahamyan’s home, however, eggs will not be
dyed. Abrahamyan slaughtered his chickens in February, fearing that they may
have bird flu.

`I don’t trust anyone,’ Abrahamyan says. `I only trust my own instincts. We
will not eat eggs at Easter, we will only eat fish and pilaf. God will not
take offense on us until all this calms down. How come that bird flu was
reported in Georgia and Azerbaijan, and we don’t have it?’

With the biggest day for poultry products at hand, bird flu does have some
impact.

At at least one café in Yerevan Wednesday, customers ordering Ajarian
khachapouri were told no egg dishes were being served, due to bird flu
concerns.

Cactus restaurant manager Agata Hovakimyan says the demand of poultry dishes –
which make up a third of the restaurant’s menu – is down by 20 percent since
February.

And at Mister Toaster bistro, director Tom Rostomian says that problems
connected with poultry products are considerable.

`Eighty percent of chicken is not sold,’ he says. `We had sandwiches that
sold well, now if we sell just one such sandwich we consider it something.’

Meanwhile, poultry product produces continue insisting there’s nothing to
worry about.
On Sunday, it is likely even the skeptical will believe the businessmen, or at
least put their faith in tradition on this Easter.

YEREVAN’S CAFÉ CULTURE: WHAT IS THE PRICE OF `A CUP OF COFFEE’ IN THE CAPITAL?

By Vahan Ishkhanyan

In 1998, there were 197 cafes in the city center (`Kentron’) of Yerevan. At
the end of last café season there were 427. Considering the center’s
population of about 130,000, that means there is one café per 304 residents.
And as this season has begun, the number continues to increase.

Comparisons must rely on approximation rather than hard data. But a casual
stroll in Yerevan any night between May and October would offer evidence that
this may be the per-capita café capital of this continent. (They are
not `cafes’, officially, but `objects of public catering’, a hold over
category from Soviet times.)

Where once city parks held green spaces and benches for public rest, a seat
now comes with a price – at least the cost of a cup of coffee (about 50
cents), and open greenery has been replaced with jarringly bright
advertisement umbrellas. The latest trend, in fact – proudly displayed in such
places as Astral and Jazzve – is to pave over parks and replace them, not with
simply chairs and tables, but with plush accommodations that turn the out-of-
doors into something approximating open-air living rooms.

For about six months out of the year, these cafes apparently bring enough
revenue to justify the fact that they are limited to seasonal operation. (In
some cases, owners of cafes also own restaurants with indoor service year-
round.)

>From easy business opportunity to phenomenon

`In the beginning the reasons for building cafes were different than now,’
says Lyudmila Harutyunyan, the Head of the Sociology Department of the Yerevan
State University. `Medium-sized business was not developed and it was
difficult to produce competitive goods for foreign markets. The market was
narrow, the borders were closed (and remain so).

`As the sphere of service required little investments people began to open
cafes. If it was possible to earn money on something, they capitalized on
that. Today the situation is different. Running a café became a lucrative
business. The jostle for vital locations is constant. Competition is for a
narrow territory and it is clearly seen how they seize sidewalks and lawns.’

A good monthly income of a café in central Yerevan is about $12,000.

But one owner of one of the most popular cafes says that he gets an average of
3,000 customers per day. And only about 10 percent are there simply for a 50-
cent cup of coffee.

(It is worth noting that, while the mushroom growth of cafes is phenomenal,
café culture has always been a distinguishing mark of Yerevan. At a time when
Soviet cities were made from the same mold, Yerevan was known throughout the
USSR for its abundance of open-air cafes. It was even joked that cleaning
ladies would bark at lingering customers: `Those of you who have been sitting
here since yesterday, get out!’)

Today, the image of `the poor Armenians’ is hardly upheld if café season in
the capital is the scale by which well being is measured.

And nowhere is the picture of a city at ease more vivid than in the area
around the Opera House, a Yerevan landmark.

Where, in the late 1980s, thousands stood in the yards to rally for a free
Karabakh and give the place its informal name `Freedom Square’, today
thousands sit and sip in what has become a café mall, practically obscuring
the famous and recently renovated majestic home of the musical arts.

The park is some 50,000 square meters, and over the past four years has been
divided up – mostly by government officials who have taken over the property
out-right, or by having it purchased in the name of a relative – into 15 cafes
with about 300 tables where empty seats are a summertime rarity.

In the greater area ringing the park, there are 70 cafes on 115 hectares.

While the city center has become a capital of casual consumption, the expense
has been the destruction of green space that once was a haven of free escape
from the noise and dirt of a compact city.

(There are significantly fewer cafes in the suburbs. For example, in the
district of Ajapnyak, five kilometers from the city center, there are about 20
cafes. With 106,600 residents, there is about one café for every 5,330
residents.)

Even official architects admit that the appearance of the city center has been
distorted by cafes taking over green areas.

`Of course, all this is abnormal, but we need to be patient, it will get to
normal,’ says Armen Lalayants, deputy to the chief architect of the city. He
hopes that the time will come when the café phenomena will pass as a fashion,
and the way will be cleared again for green areas.

`Visiting a café in Armenia is the reflection of a Mediterranean culture,’
says Harutyunyan. `Armenians like living in a community which is not typical
for northern peoples.’

The cost of `a cup of coffee’

At least 130 cafes have been constructed on property that was previously a
public park.

According to the data of the Social-Ecological Association, between 1995-2002
the city lost more that 1,000 hectares of public green territories because of
construction (including cafes). Meanwhile, green space decreased to 3.6
percent. It was 30.6 percent in 1986.

Srbuhi Harutyunyan, head of the Social-Ecological Association, is among
activists who are disturbed to see construction in general, and oligarch-owned
cafes in particular, rob Yerevan of its greenery.

She cites a World Health Organization study that says city residents need 50
square meters of green territories per resident to have healthy oxygen intake.

According to Harutyunyan’s research, in 1986 Yerevan had 42.3 square meters of
green for each resident. By 1995, the number had decreased to 27.6 square
meters. And, today, there are only 4.5 square meters of green space for each
of the capital’s one million residents.

During a 60-year period of development in Yerevan city planners created 1,930
hectares of public green space. Today there is only 503 hectares left. And,
significantly, 77 percent of the loss occurred in the past eight years – long
after Armenia’s energy crisis was the cause for the cutting of trees.

(One of the most outrageous examples cited by journalists as a moral violation
was a report in 2004 that the Minister of Nature Protection, the very guardian
of Armenia’s ecology, had dug up evergreen trees from one of the republic’s
few nature preserves and replanted them around a café owned by his wife, where
the trees soon wilted and died.)

Stopping the further loss of green space has become a celebrated cause in
Yerevan media. Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) have been founded with
the express purpose of saving whatever is left. But protests have had
practically no impact.

Harutyunyan, the sociologist, says that one of the causes of the easy
appropriation of green areas is that Yerevan retains a village mentality and
has never formed a culture of a modern urban society. (It is not accidental
that in some suburbs, cows are pastured in lawns.)

`The small city was destroyed in the 1960s, the village filled the city and
the village absorbed the city in itself instead of the opposite,’ Harutyunyan
says. `As a result, the tradition of city values (especially parks) has
disappeared.’

The sociologist says, too, that the popularity of cafes (in spite of the
disdain with which they are viewed by some) is an indication of an emerging
middle class.

`The cafes of the center became the sitting place for bourgeoisie,’ says
Harutyunyan. `Who visits a café? Those who visit it are a newly born middle
class but not a stratum that forms the country’s policy. . .’

(This article appears in the latest issue of AGBU magazine, )

SPORT ROUNDUP: KICKING, WRESTLING, THINKING, FIGHTING . . .

By Suren Musayelyan
ArmeniaNow reporter

Football

A draw for the 2006 Intertoto Cup held at the UEFA headquarters in Switzerland
pitted an Armenian club that will qualify for participation in the tournament
in June against a team from Georgia.

The most likely participant in the Intertoto Cup from Armenia is Yerevan’s FC
Kilikia, fifth place finishers in the national championship last season.

Its Georgian opponent is not known yet either. Armenian and Georgian clubs
have already played each other as part of UEFA club competitions in the past.
In the latest match Yerevan’s FC Banants eliminated Tbilisi’s FC Lokomotiv in
the UEFA Cup last year.

If the Armenian club manages to overcome the first hurdle in the 2006
Intertoto Cup it will face an Austrian representative (not known yet either).
The first match between the Armenian and Georgian clubs will be played on June
17 or 18.

Today (April 14) FC Pyunik (Yerevan) and FC Gandzasar (Kapan) will play at the
Vazgen Sargsyan `Republican’ Stadium and Gyumri’s FC Shirak will play FC Mika
(Ashtarak) in Gyumri to open the 15th national championship of Armenia in
which eight clubs participate. April 15, FC Ararat (Yerevan) will play FC
Banants (Yerevan), and FC Ulis (Yerevan) will play FC Kilikia (Yerevan).
(Based on reports by A1 Plus, the Football Federation of Armenia)

WRESTLING

Four Russian freestyle wrestlers have received permission from the Wrestling
Federation of Russia (WFR) to continue their career in the national team of
Armenia, Regnum news agency reports, quoting a document signed by WFR
President Mikhail Mamiashvili.

The move is part of the plan of Armenian National Olympic Committee President
Gagik Tsarukyan to secure medals for the Olympic team of Armenia at the Games
in Beijing. In particular, in mid-March Tsarukyan said that eight Russian
wrestlers, including world and European champions, will join the national
wrestling team of Armenia. According to a preliminary agreement, in the event
of winning the 2008 Olympics each of the Russian wrestlers will receive
$500,000 from Armenia’s National Olympic Committee; in case of winning the
Olympic gold Armenians will receive $700,000.

The most famous of the four whose names have already been confirmed is Ruslan
Kokayev (up to 74kg) who became the European champion in his weight category
in 2004 performing under Russia’s flag. Vadim Laliyev (up to 84kg), Shamil
Gitinov (up to 96kg) and Ruslan Basiyev (up to 120kg) are also considered
strong athletes in their respective weight categories.

All the four are included in the preliminary application of Armenia for the
European championships to be held in Moscow on April 25-30. But their actual
participation in the tournament is still under question.

CHESS

Armenian chess players GMs Artashes Minasyan, Ashot Anastasyan, Tigran L.
Petrosyan, IMs Arman Pashikyan, Tigran Kotanjyan, WGMs Lilit Lazarian, Elina
Danielyan, Nelli Aghinyan, WIM Siranush Andreasyan are participating in the
7th European Men’s and Women’s Individual Chess Championships held in Aydin,
Kusadasi (Turkey) on April 4-17.

After eight rounds of the tournament Armenian grandmasters Ashot Anastasyan
and Artashes Minasyan have 5.5 points each and share 3rd-19th places, half a
point behind second-placed Vasiliy Ivanchuk (Ukraine). The leader is Croatian
Zdenko Kozul with 6.5 points.

Tigran Kotanjyan and Tigran Petrosyan are in the middle of the table with 4.5
points, and Arman Pashikyan has 3.5 points.

Among women Elina Danielyan and Lilit Lazarian have 5 points each and share
11th-30th places and still have chances to finish among the top three if they
win their games in the remaining three rounds. Siranush Andreasyan and Nelli
Aghinyan have 4.5 points each and share 31st-44th places.

JUDO

The President of the European Judo Union Marius Vizner (Romania) was on a
three-day visit to Yerevan this week at the invitation of the Judo Federation
of Armenia.

It was agreed that one of the most prestigious judo tournaments, the Grand
Prix, will be held in Yerevan in October 2007.

As the host of the tournament in 2007 Armenia will have one participant in
each weight category. $250,000 will be spent on the tournament, including a
$100,000 prize fund. (A1 Plus, Armenpress)

www.armenianow.com
www.uefa.com
www.acnis.am
www.agbu.org.

Privatization Program Adopted

PRIVATIZATION PROGRAM ADOPTED

Lragir.am
13 april 06

Despite the heated parliamentary debates and revelations that
lasted for three days the National Assembly adopted the report
on performance of privatization of state property 2001-2003, and
the program of privatization 2005-2007. It was confirmed thanks to
“forcing” the members of parliament who hardly ever attend the meetings
of parliament to turn up.

Nonetheless, Victor Dallakyan, Ardarutiun Alliance, called for a
boycott not to have quorum. Only the alliance and some members of
the National Unity followed him. The Orinats Yerkir voted against the
program. The ARF representatives voted as they wanted. Some voted for,
others against the program, yet some abstained. The 10-11 members of
the People’s Deputy Group supplied 15-16 votes.

The head of the Department for Management of State Property Karineh
Kirakosyan announced that the 2005-2007 program is the final program
of privatization, including about 300 companies. The list does not
include educational, scientific and medical institutions.

Human Rights Violated By Those Who Are To Protect

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATED BY THOSE WHO ARE TO PROTECT

Lragir.am
14 April 06

On April 13 the National Assembly heard the report on the activity of
the ombudsman of Armenia in 2005. The report was presented by Armen
Harutiunyan, who became ombudsman in March 2006. According to the
members of parliament, Armen Harutiunyan observed all the rules of
decency and deserves praise. In his report he had included mostly
statistical facts, without dwelling on assessments, and noticed in
the beginning that “the first ombudsman could have been given the
opportunity to present the report on the activity in 2005.” The picture
of 2005 is the following: the ombudsman received 1551 complaints from
1824 citizens, some are signed by groups of people, 533 complaints ,
i.e. 34 per cent were discussed.

In European countries they attend to 20-25 per cent of complaints. The
majority of complaints are about strange methods of investigation
used by the police, the social security agencies for problems with
benefits, courts, the Ministry of Justice, the Office of Public
Prosecutor, the City Hall of Yerevan, regional administrations,
other agencies. The police is in the first place – 191 complaints,
social security agencies are the second – 179, then come courts –
166. The lowest number of complaints are about the Ministry of Finance
and Economy and the Ministry of Energy – three complaints each. This
statistics allowed MP Victor Dallakyan to conclude that human rights
are often violated by those who are called to protect them, i.e. the
police, courts of law, the Office of Public Prosecutor.

They Try To Preserve The Armenian Church In Akhaltskha

THEY TRY TO PRESERVE THE ARMENIAN CHURCH IN AKHALTSKHA

A1+
[02:07 pm] 14 April, 2006

The doors of the Armenian Church “Surb Nshan” were closed during Soviet
times. After the collapse of the Soviet regime the Georgian Orthodox
Church tried to get hold of the Church which caused serious conflict.

Perhaps because of this the question was frozen and the church was
ignored.

Today the Armenian Youth Union “Zori Zoryan” has started to improve
the condition of the church on their own initiative. According to
the representative of the union, the Church is a sacrament for them,
irrespective of the position of the Georgian Government and the
Orthodox Church, “A-Info” reports.

Strengthening Ties With US Congress Important,Armenian NA Speaker St

STRENGTHENING TIES WITH US CONGRESS IMPORTANT, ARMENIAN NA SPEAKER STATES

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
April 12 2006

Yerevan, April 12. /ARKA/. At his meeting with Chairman of the Foreign
Allocations Subcommittee, Chamber of Representatives, US Congress,
Jim Colby and Head of the “Millennium Challenges” corporation John
Danilovich, Speaker of the RA Parliament Artur Baghdasaryan pointed
out the importance of strengthening ties between the RA Parliament
and the US Congress.

Baghdasaryan pointed out the necessity of deepening the dialogue and
the importance of the RA Parliament’s involvement in the programs
implemented on the initiative of the US Congressional committee for
facilitation of democracy.

In his turn, Jim Colby promised assistance to Armenia in this matter.

BAKU: PACE Ad Hoc Committee On NK To Hold A Meeting In Large DuringS

PACE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON NK TO HOLD A MEETING IN LARGE DURING SUMMER SESSION – MP SEYIDOV
Author: R.Abdullayev

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
April 13 2006

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) Ad Hoc
Committee on Nagorno-Karabakh will hold a meeting in large during
the summer session. MP Samad Seyidov, the head of the Azerbaijani
parliamentary delegation to the PACE, told a correspondent of Trend in
Strasbourg. He was commenting on the results of a meeting of the heads
of delegations of Azerbaijan and Armenia with Lord Russel Johnson,
the chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee on 12 April.

It was also resolved to arrange a meeting of the representatives of
Armenia and Azerbaijan for discussion of the Karabakh conflict in
the course of the PACE session.

BAKU Prepares For New Phase In U.S.-Azerbaijani Strategic Relations

BAKU PREPARES FOR NEW PHASE IN U.S.-AZERBAIJANI STRATEGIC RELATIONS
By Taleh Ziyadov

Eurasia Daily Monitor, DC
April 12 2006

As Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliev prepares to visit the United
States at the end of April, several high-ranking officials from
Azerbaijan have already toured Washington and explored ways to
strengthen U.S.-Azerbaijan relations.

On March 29, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan Araz
Azimov arrived in Washington to participate in the next round of the
U.S.-Azerbaijan security dialogue. Bilateral cooperation on security
in the Caspian region began in 1996 and has intensified considerably
since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Azimov, who headed the interagency delegation from Azerbaijan, was
accompanied by Azerbaijan’s deputy minister of national security,
Fuad Iskenderov; the deputy chief of State Border Services, Farhad
Tagizade; and the commander-in-chief of the Azerbaijani Navy, Shahin
Sultanov (AzerTag, March 31).

Azimov met with Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military
Affairs John Hillen, who represented the U.S. delegation. Officials
from both states discussed “a wide range of security and defense
issues, and highlighted the joint commitment to increased cooperation
[between Baku and Washington]” (State Department statement, March 31).

In his interview with the Azerbaijan state news agency AzerTag, Azimov
highlighted the main issues discussed during his talks, including the
“security of Azerbaijan at national and regional levels, relations
within NATO, the increasing role of the OSCE in the South Caucasus,
settlement of regional conflicts, relations among the Caspian coastal
states, and the military-political situation in the Caspian basin”
(AzerTag, March 31).

On March 30, Azimov delivered a speech at the Center for Strategic
and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, DC, and talked about
the Karabakh peace process, Azerbaijan’s energy and security policies,
and its Euro-Atlantic agenda.

Asked whether Iran was a subject of discussions, he reminded, “Some
130-km long section of the Azerbaijan-Iran border is currently under
Armenian occupation and outside of Azerbaijan’s control, which is a
serious security threat.” In addition, Azimov stated that Iran’s recent
activities in the southern sector of the Caspian Sea, which Azerbaijan
shares with Iran, worried official Baku. As for the Iranian nuclear
program, he stressed that Azerbaijan supports a peaceful resolution
of the issue (AzerTag, March 31).

Following Azimov’s visit, the Minister Foreign Affairs Elmar
Mammadyarov arrived in Washington on April 7. Mammadyarov also met
with high-ranking U.S. officials, including U.S. Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice.

In his speech at Heritage Foundation on Friday, April 7, Mammadyarov
described Azerbaijan as a “strategic ally” of the United States and
listed Azerbaijan’s economic achievements in the last 15 years.

Deepening U.S.-Azerbaijan relations “corresponds to our national
interest” and Baku and Washington “are working quite successfully” in
this direction Mammadyarov remarked. He also mentioned the successful
cooperation between the United States and Azerbaijan in the energy and
security field, pointing to the construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
oil and the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum natural gas pipelines and two radar
stations in Azerbaijan (Heritage.org, April 7).

Mammadyarov told Jamestown that soon Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey
would begin construction of another strategically important project,
the Baku-Tbilisi-Akhalkalaki-Kars railway. This project will connect
Trans-European and Trans-Asian railway networks and will allow
Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Central Asian states to ship their goods
and products to Turkey and onward to Europe by rail.

One of the central components of the U.S.-Azerbaijan security dialogue
has been the Karabakh peace process. The February meeting of the
presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan in France resulted in a deadlock
and produced no results. Although the OSCE co-chairs for the Karabakh
peace process remain optimistic about a possible breakthrough in 2006,
the failure of talks in Paris stressed the need for new proposals.

After meeting with Rice, Mammadyarov stated that Washington had made
him a “very interesting” proposal for resolution of the Karabakh
conflict. He added that the Azerbaijani government would consider
the U.S. proposal and would make its position public when U.S. OSCE
co-chair Steven Mann visits Baku on April 18 (Day.az, April 8).

The U.S. interest in speeding up the resolution of Karabakh conflict
has led the Azerbaijani media and local analysts to question the U.S.

role in the region. But official Baku has used Washington’s growing
interest in the region as an opportunity to strengthen U.S.-Azerbaijani
bilateral relations.

According to Ali Hasanov, head of the socio-political department of
presidential administration, “Clearly, the U.S. does not want the
resumption of hostilities in the region. We too would like to resolve
the Karabakh conflict this year. But the fact is that Armenia still
occupies Azerbaijan’s territories and Baku preserves its right to
restore its territorial integrity. We want the U.S. and other OSCE
Minsk group states to pressure Armenia” (Day.az, April 12).

For Azerbaijan, the return of internally displaced persons to
their homes and the question of the country’s territorial integrity
continue to play a critical role in the peace talks. Baku hopes that
its growing ties with Washington could result in a more favorable
peace agreement and change the status quo in the region by ending the
Karabakh conflict. Hence, the United States could become a leading
player in the Karabakh peace process and U.S.-Azerbaijan strategic
relations could further increase U.S. influence in the Caspian region.

Georgians Afraid Of The Chechens… From Russian Intelligence

GEORGIANS AFRAID OF THE CHECHENS… FROM RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE
Pavel Simonov, Asim Oku

Axis News
April 12 2006

The Chechen members of the Russian military intelligence are acting
in the Georgian territory. This was declared by a representative of
the leadership of the Ministry of Interior of Georgia, affiliated
with the counterspionage department. AIA has addressed him with the
request to comment on the statement that the Chechen employees of
the Main Intelligence Service

Emblem of GRU (GRU) of the Ministry of Defence of Russia have
been operating outside the Chechen Republic. April 6 the Russian
newspaper Moskovsky komsomolets published a report from the Chechen
Republic, containing interview to the Lieutenant-Colonel Said Magomed
Kakiyev. He is a commander of one of the two battalions of the GRU
in which the majority of servicemen is made by the Chechens. The
battalion headed by Kakiyev, conditionally carries the name of the
“West” that corresponds to a zone of its operative responsibility. It
has been operating mainly in the western part of the Chechen Republic.

The Moskovsky komsomolets’ article basically repeats the previous
stories of the Russian press devoted to Kakiyev. Some original
snatches concern the battalion itself: its equipment, tactics of
special operations, and the tasks carried out by the unit. However
the most interesting points concern the geography of the activities
of Kakiyev’s subordinates. As it was already noted, a zone of their
responsibility is the Western Chechnya. In the north this part of the
republic adjoins to Stavropol Territory, in the West it adjoins two
other North Caucasian republics – Ingushetia and Northern Ossetia,
and in the south rests against the Russian-Georgian border.

Especially, about half of this sector of the border lies within the
zone of the direct responsibility of the battalion “West”. Formally
it is considered that Kakiyev’s subordinates “work” exclusively in
territory of the republic. However the correspondent of the Moskovskij
komsomolets narrates that “the battalion along with the servicemen
of the Ministry of Interior and the FSB operates also outside the
Chechen Republic. But this is not especially advertised…”. The
truth is that two years ago in an interview to the online paper
Utro.ru Kakiyev himself had recognized that his battalion carries
out operations in the neighbouring North Caucasian republics, in
particular in Ingushetia and Daghestan. However, except for these two,
the Chechen Republic adjoins also to Georgia.

Georgian secrets of the GRU

Making comments on the above-stated information, the source in the
Ministry of Interior of Georgia has told that according to the
counter-intelligence of Tbilisi, the Chechen members of the GRU
have indeed participated in secret operations in territory of the
republic. As a rule, they were crossing the border a bit at a time,
under a kind of refugees or the Chechen separatists. Border crossing
was carried out both from the Chechen Republic, and from Daghestan.

Cases when the Chechen scouts passed deep into the Georgian territory
more than on fifty kilometers are also known. Here they were engaged
in gathering of the information on routes of movement and places of
stationing of the Chechen separatists, especially their leaders.

Georgian counter-intelligence has suspicions that the GRU members
have also carried out secret special actions. In particular, it is
an issue of provocation instigation of collisions between various
groups of the Chechen separatists and of liquidation of some of their
activists. To the point, these data were indirectly confirmed in March
2004 with the commander of the battalion “West” Said-Ìagomed Kakiyev.

The assassinated Ruslan Gelayev In an interview to the Russian online
paper Utro.ru he said: “Our unit had to participate in a special action
on annihilation of the gang of Gelayev in Daghestan”. Ruslan Gelayev
was considered as one of the chief commanders of the separatist
movement. He was lost some weeks prior to the publication of the
mentioned above interview of Kakiyev. And it actually took place on
the Georgian border, in the area which does not relate at all to the
zone of the responsibility of the battalion “West”.

The representative of the Ministry of Interior of Georgia recollects
that in the summer-autumn of 2002 Tbilisi was seriously worried about
the Chechen scouts with a view of chances to legitimize intrusion of
the Russian troops in the territory of the republic. As he said, at
that time Moscow considered an feasibility of transfer to Georgia of
several dozens of Chechens from the GRU. Back they should come in the
guise of a kind of separatists. Then under a pretext of destruction of
“congestions of insurgents” in the Georgian territory, the Russian
command expected to lead a large-scale operation of “smooth-out”
of the Chechen settlements in the northeast of the republic.

By the way, in September 2002 the representatives of the highest Moscow
leadership spoke openly about such an opportunity. The then Minister
of Foreign Affairs of Russia Igor Ivanov declared that his country
“reserves the right to itself to pursue terrorists, including in the
territory of Georgia”. And President Vladimir Putin had publicly asked
the Russian General Staff to submit him proposals on the possibility
to strike against the bases of terrorists “directly in the Georgian
territory”. Our interlocutor is convinced that rapproachement of
Tbilisi with Washington in military area, in particular the stay at
that time in Georgia of a significant number of instructors from the
Pentagon, has allowed to avoid such a scenario. “Russians were afraid
of the prospect to collide here with American militaries,” – considers
the representative of the Georgian Ministry of Interior. Concluding
the conversation, he noted that the peak of activity of the Chechen
scouts in the territory of the republic had fallen to the period of
2001-2004. At the same time our source does not exclude that the GRU
is continuing to operate in the north-west of Georgia at present, too.

Enemy number one?

Georgia keeps one of the first places among the CIS countries as
regards the activity of the Russian intelligence services. Last year
the Vice-Speaker of the Georgian parliament Michael Machavariani even
declared, that the Russian agents have been penetrating all power
structures of the republic.

Simon Kiladze Most likely, arrest of the official of the presidential
administration Simon Kiladze a few weeks ago, was intended to support
similar statements. “I am afraid, it is not the last person who can
be found out in the state structures, engaged in similar activities,”
– the head of state Michael Saakashvili has noted. “We have a lot of
information that we have been collecting for a longer time,” said he.

Commenting the current situation in an interview to Russian online
paper Kavkazskij uzel, a representative of the Georgian Ministry
of State Security has told that “the Russian intelligence and
counter-intelligence have been working very energetically in Georgia.”

According to his data, “the approximate number of the Russian
fixed-post spies working in our country reaches 50-75 persons”. And
though in republic have been operating various Russian special
services, including the FSB (since 1999-2000 by the use of the
Department of Coordination of the Operative Information – UKOI), the
attention of Tbilisi is keeping a close watch almost exclusively on
the GRU.

The espionage theme became an integral part of the Georgian-Russian
opposition during the rule of Edward Shevardnadze (1992 – 2003). It
was promoted to no small degree by the unadvertised participation of
the Russian power structures in the Abkhazian conflict (1992-1994).

>From the beginning of 2000, the growth of espionage mania of Tbilisi
regarding Moscow has been observed. The given phenomenon in many
respects is the result of the second Chechen war, that begun autumn
1999, and the change of power in Georgia four years later.

After renewal of military actions in the Chechen Republic, the Russian
leadership has accused Tbilisi of connivance, and even assistance to
the Chechen separatists.

In September 2002 the Chief of the General Staff of Russia Anatoly
Kvashnin compared the government of Georgia to a regime of the Talibs
in Afghanistan, having accused the Georgian power structures in
rendering assistance to the Chechens. Shortly before that, official
representatives of Tbilisi had announced the fact of assault and
battery by the Russian aircraft on the territory of the republic.

Against this background, in September 2002, shown discontent
with cooperation with Georgia in the sphere of security, Vladimir
Putin declared deployment of the GRU units on the border of the two
countries. The then Head of Georgian intelligence Àvtandil Yoseliani
publicly showed his concern on the subject. However in June 2003
the President of Russia has spoken out on the possible appearance of
the GRU members already directly in the Northeast Georgia. Thus he
has officially confirmed the fact of heightened interest of his own
secret services to this area.

In December of the same year an unnamed member of the Georgian
government has warned on the pages of the British paper The Guardian,
about the plans of the GRU “to wreck construction of the Baku –
Tbilisi – Ceyhan pipeline”. According to the source of the English
journalists: “the pipeline can be attacked by the Chechen insurgents
or the ecological saboteurs recruited by the Russian military
intelligence”. Making comments on the article,

Àvtandil Yoseliani Namyk Abbasov, the Minister of National Security of
Azerbaijan, has noted that “it does not follow to seriously perceive
such statements”. At the same time he has recognized the presence of
intelligence data on possible actions of terror against the Baku –
Tbilisi – Ceyhan pipeline.

In August 2004 Nikolay Tabatadze, the Deputy Minister of Foreign
Affairs of Georgia, has declared that at one of the Russian army
bases in the North Caucasus about 400 inhabitants of South Ossetia
have been undergoing special training. South Ossetia is an autonomous
republic located within the borders of Georgia, but not submitting
to Tbilisi. The Georgian official also told that Anatoly Sysoyev,
the military adviser of the South Ossetian president, is a GRU colonel.

Tabatadze has noted that the Russian officer arrived to South Ossetia
in June 2004 and since then personally supervises the preparation of
200 more persons directly in territory of the rebellious republic.

Simultaneously, on the background of activization of the efforts
to settle the Georgian-Ossetian conflict, a group of insurgents not
under control of either party emerged in the zone of opposition.

According to Georgy Baramidze, the Minister of Defence of Georgia,
the given group has been “well equipped and trained”. As the main task
of the unknown insurgents the minister named “provocations on kindling
large-scale military actions”. According to Baramidze, the group has
arrived to South Ossetia from the Russian territory. In parallel, the
representatives of the Georgian command have distributed information
that the “third force” in the zone of the conflict consists not from
the Southern Ossetians, but from the servicemen of a GRU division.

Additional information on this occasion has been made public in
November, 2004 by the Head of the Committee on Defense and Security in
the Georgian parliament Givi Targamadze. He told about the delivering
to Georgia of the diversive groups trained by the Russian military
intelligence. According to Òargamadze, this time, their task consisted
in striking the key targets of power supply. The current President
of Georgia Michael Saakashvili has actually confirmed availability of
“data on diversions about to take place”.

Half a year later, in May 2005, Georgian press fed by the local
authorities, has accused the GRU of plans of destabilization of
situation in the Dzhavaheti area in the south of the republic,
inhabited mostly by the Armenians.

Givi Targamadze The same month, during the US President’s visit to
Tbilisi, an assasination attempt on him has been accomplished. Vladimir
Arutyunyan suspected of this crime, was detained in July of the same
year. Then the leader of the Popular Front of Georgia Nodar Natadze
declared that the arrested person “is an agent of the GRU”.

July 25, 2005 Georgian Minister of Interior Vano Merabishvili has
accused the mentioned above Anatoly Sysoyev of the organization
of acts of terror in territory of the country. As the Minister of
Interior put it: “About one and a half year ago under direction of
the GRU colonel a diversive group that have had training preparations
in Russia has been formed.” Actions attributed to the group have
been directed against the state strategic objects, first thing,
concentrating on the system of power supply. Three citizens of South
Ossetia have been detained on charge with direct perpetration of these
diversions. The republican TV has shown a confession of one of them –
Georgy Valiyev. He has told about the combat training at the training
camp in South Ossetia under direction of the Russian instructors.

Vano Merabishvili About 100-115 persons were trained alongside with him
there. Then, in August the same year, 90 of them were sent to the North
Caucasus where they have continued trainings assisted by the Russian
instructors again. According to Valiyev, they had been training the
skills of guerrilla warfare, in particular, mine-laying and blasting
operations. Givi Targamadze, the Head of the Parliamentary Committee
on Defense and Security, has announced in this connection that “in
Georgia the numerous secret-service network operates and diversive
groups are being prepared with the strength up to 120 persons.”

In turn, the Vice-Speaker of the parliament Michael Machavariani
ascertained: “The GRU has its agents at all levels of authority of
Georgia”. As he said: “Old channels of secret service network that
have been used by the KGB in the past, continue to function today,
too”. The Vice-Speaker has emphasized that “when Russia started
already to organize the acts of terror, a secret network within the
power structures is especially dangerous”. It goes without saying
that Moscow has categorically denied all charges of Tbilisi.

According to the Russian Foreign Ministry press release, this country
“has no relation” to the acts of terror in the territory of Georgia.

It was noted that “the persons, whose names were mentioned in the
statement of the Ministry of Interior of Georgia, are not registered
and do not work in any official structures of Russia”.

Representatives of the Russian Defence Ministry have voiced their
position through the mass-media, especially having underlined that
Anatoly Sysoyev “all is not on the list of the GRU”.

Simultaneously sources in the General Staff have called all the
data of the Georgian side “the extreme provocation reflecting the
general unfriendly line of the official Tbilisi towards Moscow”. It
was also said that “the persons specified by Merabishvili have never
served in the Russian army”. Despite of such unequivocal refutations,
officials of the Georgian Ministry of Interior have conveyed their
request to the Russian colleagues to provide information on the
already well-known “GRU colonel”. According to Vano Merabishvili,
the incoming reply said that Anatoly Sysoyev does really exist, but
“granting of the information on him infringes on interests of Russia’s
national security”.

January, 22 this year as a result of diversions pipelines on which
the Russian gas is delivered to Georgia and Armenia have been
damaged. Representatives of the official Tbilisi accused Moscow of
the organization of these actions. The responsibility they have
actually assigned to the Russian military intelligence, having
demanded extradition of “two GRU officers, Anatoly Sysoyev and Roman
Boiko”. They also were accused of the organization of similar actions
that took place in the Georgian territory in 2004. It is curious,
that in this connection, “a source in one of the FSB divisions”
on an internet site Kavkazsky Uzel, has confirmed the presence in
Georgia of the Russian secret-service network. He has also noted,
that in South Ossetia “secret services of almost all countries of
the world, including Russia and Georgia” actively operate. However,
the representative of FSB has accused the Georgian colleagues in
diversions on gas pipelines.

Moscow’s Chechen intelligence

According to the statement of the representative of the Georgian
Ministry of Interior, the Chechen battalion “West” has been the one of
divisions of the Russian military intelligence that has conducted its
operations in the republic. It refers to the most coded structures of
the GRU. In total there are only two such battalions conditionally
called the “West” and the “East”. They have been generated in the
end of 2003, on the basis of two special task companies, operating in
the Mountain grouping structure of the Russian troops in the Chechen
Republic. Both of the battalions are submitted directly to the General
Staff of the army.

Servicemen of the “East”, the same as its commander Sulim Yamadayev,
in the period of 1994-1999 were a part of the armed formations of
the Chechen separatists, and fought against the Russian troops. For
this reason, representatives of Moscow at times have been treating
them with some mistrust and even suspicion.

The battalion “West”, on the contrary, from the Russian point of view,
is considered the most reliable Chechen unit. Its many representatives,
the same as their commander, Lieutenant Colonel Said-Magomed Kakiyev,
still in 1993-1994 belonged to the armed formations of the pro-Russian
opposition opposed to the Chechen president Dzhokhar Dudayev.

Said Magomed Kakiyev Shortly before the beginning of the first war
in republic (December, 1994), Kakiyev even commanded all the forces
of opposition, bulding on the aid of the Russian secret services.

In 1994-1996 a part of the veterans of the battalion “West” acted
on the side of federal army, including within the framework of
power structures of then pro-Russian administration of the Chechen
Republic. After the conclusion of the arrangement on the termination
of the conflict in August 1996 (the Khasavyurt agreements), the
majority of them has left for Russia. They returned home only after
the beginning of the second Chechen war in the autumn of 1999.

Personnel In the Russian mass-media contradictory information on the
strength of the battalion “West” has been disclosed. Most likely, data
that is most approached to reality, is that from 1,000 up to several
thousand people serve in the battalion. In January 2005 Kakiyev has
declared, that the number of persons willing “to get in the battalion
reaches 3144 persons who have fighting experience”. The majority of the
servicemen is made by the Chechens. Their significant part – natives
of the Nadterechny area in the northwest of the Chechen Republic.

Therefrom comes Kakiyev himself. Population of this area traditionally
adhere to the pro-Russian frame of mind and from the beginning of
1990’s negatively perceive the idea of independence of the republic.

Some Caucasian sources note one more rather curious detail regarding
the personnel of the battalion. According to these sources, Kakiyev
and a lot of his nearest fellows are natives of the Chechen kin known
for adherence to those local Suffi orders that from the second half
of the 19th century in every possible way showed the loyalty to the
Russian authority. It explains the emphasized devotion of Kakiyev
and of some his officers. Joining the battalion the beginners from
among Chechens, necessarily should swear fidelity on the Koran. The
commander calls himself “the slave to the Allah” and “the soldier
of an islam”, but also a “fierce opponent of a vakhabism”. Thus,
participation of Kakiyev and his comrades-in-arms on the side of
Moscow is based, among other things, on the ideological antagonism
between the currents of the traditional for the North Caucasus Suffi
currents in Islam and modern Islamic fundamentalism. At the same time,
at online forums visited by the local Muslim youth, in particular from
North Caucasus, Kakiyev and his subordinates are not seldom called as
“national-traitors”.

Tasks and Tactics Talking to a reporter of the Moskovsky komsomolets,

Kakiyev announced that the aim of his battalion is “to annihilate camps
and basis of the militants in the mountainous part of the republic, to
carry out search operations”. Other Russian sources note that this unit
participates in almost all the significant reconnaissance operations
in the Western Chechnya. It is known from Kakiyev’s contacts with
the journalists that his battalion has played a key role in the
elimination of a number of major separatist movement commanders,
particularly Ruslan Gelayev, March 2004.

In the connection of the used tactics, Kakiyev notes: “We do not
move around the republic in large columns. We move forward in small
groups to a particular site of the special operation.” Characteristic
feature of the battalion is its ability to conduct combat operations
for several weeks in the difficult climate and terrain of the Chechen
mountain areas. There is various indirect evidence that in many cases
Kakiyev’s subordinates operate with civilian clothes on or using
the separatists’ equipment. In combination with common appearance
of local population, knowledge of language and traditions, the
battalion’s servicemen qualitatively differ from the representatives
of other Russian units. And necessarily they freely accept shape of
the opponent.

Intelligence and Counter-intelligence

The mentioned above qualities allow the Kakiyev’s subordinates to
effectively collect intelligence among local population. According
to indirect evidence, the command of the battalion has set the
intelligence using its agents going. Information on the location of
separatist units in the mountains and their planned operations is being
obtained in such a way. At the same time Kakiyev is extremely careful
not to allow the enemy agents taking root within his battalion. In
this regard his unit is protected to the best advantage in comparison
with the other Chechen power structures operating on the Russian
authority’s side. As a rule, the new Chechen recruits are accepted to
the battalion at a personal reference of a battalion veteran. Former
supporters of the separatist movement receive flat refusal.

For the same reason Kakiyev avoids close contacts with the other
power structures of the republic consisting of his fellow-tribesmen.

The commander of the battalion is firmly convinced that many of the
former separatists siding with them are, in fact, “double agents”.

Armament According to the Russian regional periodical Yuzhny reporter,
the battalion “West” is equipped with the “most sophisticated weapons
in Russian army”. In its turn, a reporter of Moskovsky komsomolets
tells the following: “Regular armament of the reconnaissance units:
sub-machine-guns, machine-guns, sharp-shooter’s guns, noiseless firing
equipment, night vision devices, everybody has – Stechkin’s handgun
and knives, including knives with a discarding blade.”

cle=791

–Boundary_(ID_YNXj7rcq2dx3jpIhKrgrYg)–

http://www.axisglobe.com/article.asp?arti

CE Not Working For Full Mediation In Karabakh Talks

CE NOT WORKING FOR FULL MEDIATION IN KARABAKH TALKS

PanARMENIAN.Net
11.04.2006 23:11 GMT+04:0

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Head of the PACE Interim Committee on Nagorno
Karabakh Lord Russell-Johnston said he thinks of the opportunity
of resumption of hostilities in the conflict zone “with great
displeasure.” Lord Russell-Johnston remarked, “creation of the NK
Committee at the PACE does not mean we work for becoming full mediators
in the talks.” “The OSCE Minsk Group has been professionally dealing
with it for over 10 years now and I do not think the CE can replace it.

Our task is to provide the necessary assistance to the OSCE MG
co-chairs,” said head of the PACE Interim Committee.

Russell-Johnston did not rule out a visit of the Interim Committee to
Armenia and Azerbaijan, as well as meetings with NK representatives
this year. “We also consider the opportunity to organize a meeting
between Armenian and Azeri MPs, however speaking of concrete agreements
is early still,” Russell-Johnston said, Mediamax reports.

Peacemakers Not Wanted

PEACEMAKERS NOT WANTED

Lragir.am
12 April 06

Over the past week Lragir.am offered the question to its readers
whether peacemakers must be stationed in the zone of conflict
over Nagorno Karabakh. 67 per cent of our Armenian and English
speaking readers are against stationing peacemakers. 23 per cent
think it depends on which country’s troops will be stationed. 5 per
cent think stationing peacemakers can be acceptable only after the
settlement of the conflict, and 2 per cent believe that the ceasefire
is successfully maintained without peacemakers. And only 3 per cent
think that peacemakers must be stationed in the zone of the conflict
over Nagorno Karabakh.