Language rights issue fuels discord in Georgia

ISN, Switzerland
Internal Relations & Security Network
March 31 2006

Language rights issue fuels discord in Georgia

Georgia’s Armenian community says that discrimination is leading to
lost chances to achieve in the country. The government says that’s
not the case.

By Paul Rimple for Eurasianet (30/3/06)

Discontent is rising within Georgia’s Armenian community, the
country’s largest ethnic minority, driven by complaints concerning
the central government’s language policy, as well as perceptions of
discrimination. The building tension between ethnic Armenians and
Georgian government officials has been linked to recent rioting and
violence.

A 9 March altercation between ethnic Armenians and Svans in the Kvemo
Kartli village of Tsalka led to the death of 24-year-old Gevork
Gevorkian, an ethnic Armenian, and incited a mob to raid a local
administrative building. Two days later, in response to Gevorkian’s
death, several hundred protestors in Akhalkalaki, a predominantly
ethnic Armenian town in the neighboring region of Samtskhe-Javakheti,
stormed the local branch of Tbilisi State University, a court
building and the office of a Georgian Orthodox Church archbishop.

Responding to the violence, Parliament Speaker Nino Burjanadze on 13
March placed the blame on “serious forces, who [are] try[ing] to
trigger destabilization in this region,” the Civil Georgia web site
reported.

Some ethnic minorities in the region have a different interpretation.
“The murder of the Armenian [Gevork Gevorkian] wasn’t a political
act, it was criminal,” suggested Makhare Matsukov, an Akhalkalaki
business leader and ethnic Greek. “But politics created the situation
that exists in Tsalka and the situation here in Akhalkalaki.”

Local leaders say that protests are the only way they can get the
central government to listen to their complaints. There is talk of
boycotting local elections in October if no progress is made in
opening a dialogue with the central authorities in Tbilisi.

Frustration with what is perceived as the central government’s
disregard for Georgia’s Armenian minority prevails in both Tsalka and
Akhalkalaki, but the roots of the particular issues differ.

Once numbering 30,000, Tsalka’s Greek population is now about 1,500
and shrinking. A mass exodus occurred during the 1990s when thousands
of families relocated to Greece for work. As Greeks left, natural
disaster victims from the northern Georgian region of Svaneti and the
western Black Sea region of Achara began to move into vacant homes.
Squatters took over many abandoned houses; pillagers ransacked
others. As economic conditions in Tsalka worsened, and the town’s
crime rate increased, remaining villagers (12,000 Armenians, 1,500
Azeris and 1,500 Greeks) started to view their “guests” as a threat.

“Before the Svans arrived, there was never any trouble in Tsalka. Why
doesn’t the government do something to help? Is it because we aren’t
Georgian?” fumed Armen Darbinyan, an ethnic Armenian and chairman of
the Javakheti Citizens Forum, a non-governmental organization
sponsored by the European Center for Minority Issues.

Meanwhile, in Akhalkalaki, many say that the strained relationship
with Tbilisi (which locals call “Georgia”) began after the 2003 Rose
Revolution. After coming to power, President Mikheil Saakahsvili’s
administration overhauled the local political machinery, replacing
local officials with appointees from Tbilisi. First Deputy Governor
Armen Amirkhanyan said many local residents in this poverty-stricken
area believed the changes were driven by prejudice. Ethnic Armenians
make up 60 percent of the region, and “their rights must be
defended,” Amirkhanyan added.

The need to have a working knowledge of Georgian lies at the heart of
most complaints.

Georgian government statistics on election registration estimate the
number of ethnic Armenians in Akhalkalaki at 95.8 percent of the
town’s population of 10,000. (Local Armenians put the number at 98
percent.) Since the entire region of Samtskhe-Javakheti functions
primarily in Armenian, few Akhalkalaki residents speak Georgian. At
the same time, Russian is frequently spoken thanks to the presence of
a former Russian military base.

“We can’t get good jobs unless we speak Georgian, but how can you
learn Georgian so well when you’re 30 or 40 years old?” said a
resident of Ninotsminda, a nearby village not far from the Armenian
border. “If we can’t get work here, we will continue to move to
Russia for work, if we can get visas.” Unofficial estimates put the
number of Javakheti men who work seasonally in Russia at 80 percent.

Incentives offered by the Saakashvili government to promote Georgian
language instruction, as well as to promote the integration of
Armenians into the Georgian mainstream, have fallen flat, according
to Javakheti residents. “In 2004, Saakashvili came to Akhalkalaki and
promised to integrate 100 students into the university system in
Tbilisi and Kutaisi with stipends,” said Akhalkalaki Mayor Iricya
Nairi. “That’s great, we thought.” But Nairi claims local students
couldn’t pass the Georgian language university entry exams, which
were a result of the government’s education reforms.

Darbinyan says that he doesn’t understand how people are expected to
learn Georgian well enough to pass exams, when they have few chances
to learn it. Out of Akhalkalaki’s five secondary schools, only one
teaches courses in Georgian. Three teach in Armenian and one in
Russian.

Mayor Nairi cites the recent influx of Georgian students to the
Akhalkalaki branch of Tbilisi State University as further evidence
that the government does not want to treat ethnic Armenians equally.
After Georgian students were brought to Akhalkalaki to study for
free, Nairi charged, the number of Armenians studying at the local
university dropped to four. By contrast, he said, under former
president Eduard Shevardnadze 60 percent of the university’s 650
students were Armenian. “Why would they open a university here and
bring Georgians if they didn’t plan to change the demographics of our
region?” he wondered.

Deputy Education and Science Minister Bela Tsipuria, however, rejects
the contention. “The only reason Georgian students are studying in
Akhalkalaki is because the competition to study there is lower than
in Tbilisi or Kutaisi,” Tsipuria stated. Complaints about the
difficulty of Georgia’s new university entrance exams were not
limited to Javakheti, she added. “Young people today have to work
hard to compete in modern Georgia. This is an entirely new concept.”

Tsipuria argues that Javakheti’s problems have more to do with a lack
of educational opportunities than language – a problem not unique to
Samtskhe-Javakheti. President Saakashvili, she stressed, has promised
that hundreds of Armenian students will have the opportunity to
receive sufficient education to find work within the civil service.

The government is currently training teachers and introducing new
methodology, Tsipuria continued. “But people don’t understand these
things take time.”

First Deputy Governor Amirkhanyan believes that education reform must
be accomplished while taking the interests of national minorities
into account. “We must learn Georgian if we want to get ahead. It
would be easier on all levels, from civic positions to farmers who
commute to Tbilisi to sell their goods.”

The issue seems to spill over easily into other areas, as well. The
February dismissal of three ethnic Armenian judges for allegedly
having an insufficient knowledge of Georgian has generated
considerable resentment. “If you don’t know the state language, then
you must go!” commented Nairi.

Similarly, the archbishop’s office was targeted by locals who assume
that the Georgian Orthodox Church is attempting to exercise excessive
influence in the region. The office was rumored to contain a cache of
weapons. The cache never materialized.

Calls have gone out recently for Samtskhe-Javakheti to be made an
autonomous region, with broader self-governance rights, and for
Armenian to be named the region’s official language. Local leaders
and most activists, however, maintain that protests against perceived
cultural assimilation should not be interpreted as a separatist
drive. Said Javakheti Citizens Forum Chairman Darbinyan: “They call
us separatists because we’re asking for cultural autonomy, but we
want democracy and decentralization.”

Language Rights Issue Fuel Discord In Georgia

LANGUAGE RIGHTS ISSUE FUEL DISCORD IN GEORGIA
Paul Rimple

EurasiaNet, NY
March 30 2006

Discontent is rising within Georgia’s Armenian community, the
country’s largest ethnic minority, driven by complaints concerning
the central government’s language policy, as well as perceptions
of discrimination. The building tension between ethnic Armenians
and Georgian government officials has been linked to recent rioting
and violence.

A March 9 altercation between ethnic Armenians and Svans in the Kvemo
Kartli village of Tsalka led to the death of 24-year-old Gevork
Gevorkian, an ethnic Armenian, and incited a mob to raid a local
administrative building. Two days later, in response to Gevorkian’s
death, several hundred protestors in Akhalkalaki, a predominantly
ethnic Armenian town in the neighboring region of Samtskhe-Javakheti,
stormed the local branch of Tbilisi State University, a court building
and the office of a Georgian Orthodox Church archbishop.

Responding to the violence, Parliament Speaker Nino Burjanadze on March
13 placed the blame on “serious forces, who [are] try[ing] to trigger
destabilization in this region,” the Civil Georgia web site reported.

Some ethnic minorities in the region have a different interpretation.

“The murder of the Armenian [Gevork Gevorkian] wasn’t a political act,
it was criminal,” suggested Makhare Matsukov, an Akhalkalaki business
leader and ethnic Greek. “But politics created the situation that
exists in Tsalka and the situation here in Akhalkalaki.”

Local leaders say that protests are the only way they can get the
central government to listen to their complaints. There is talk
of boycotting local elections in October if no progress is made in
opening a dialogue with the central authorities in Tbilisi.

Frustration with what is perceived as the central government’s
disregard for Georgia’s Armenian minority prevails in both Tsalka
and Akhalkalaki, but the roots of the particular issues differ.

Once numbering 30,000, Tsalka’s Greek population is now about 1,500
and shrinking. A mass exodus occurred during the 1990s when thousands
of families relocated to Greece for work. As Greeks left, natural
disaster victims from the northern Georgian region of Svaneti and
the western Black Sea region of Achara began to move into vacant homes.

Squatters took over many abandoned houses; pillagers ransacked
others. As economic conditions in Tsalka worsened, and the town’s
crime rate increased, remaining villagers (12,000 Armenians, 1,500
Azeris and 1,500 Greeks) started to view their “guests” as a threat.

“Before the Svans arrived, there was never any trouble in Tsalka. Why
doesn’t the government do something to help? Is it because we aren’t
Georgian?” fumed Armen Darbinyan, an ethnic Armenian and chairman
of the Javakheti Citizens Forum, a non-governmental organization
sponsored by the European Center for Minority Issues.

Meanwhile, in Akhalkalaki, many say that the strained relationship
with Tbilisi (which locals call “Georgia”) began after the 2003 Rose
Revolution. After coming to power, President Mikheil Saakahsvili’s
administration overhauled the local political machinery, replacing
local officials with appointees from Tbilisi. First Deputy Governor
Armen Amirkhanyan said many local residents in this poverty-stricken
area believed the changes were driven by prejudice. Ethnic Armenians
make up 60 percent of the region, and “their rights must be defended,”
Amirkhanyan added.

The need to have a working knowledge of Georgian lies at the heart
of most complaints.

Georgian government statistics on election registration estimate
the number of ethnic Armenians in Akhalkalaki at 95.8 percent of the
town’s population of 10,000. (Local Armenians put the number at 98
percent.) Since the entire region of Samtskhe-Javakheti functions
primarily in Armenian, few Akhalkalaki residents speak Georgian. At
the same time, Russian is frequently spoken thanks to the presence
of a former Russian military base.

“We can’t get good jobs unless we speak Georgian, but how can you learn
Georgian so well when you’re 30 or 40 years old?” said a resident of
Ninotsminda, a nearby village not far from the Armenian border. “If
we can’t get work here, we will continue to move to Russia for work,
if we can get visas.” Unofficial estimates put the number of Javakheti
men who work seasonally in Russia at 80 percent.

Incentives offered by the Saakashvili government to promote Georgian
language instruction, as well as to promote the integration of
Armenians into the Georgian mainstream, have fallen flat, according
to Javakheti residents. “In 2004, Saakashvili came to Akhalkalaki
and promised to integrate 100 students into the university system in
Tbilisi and Kutaisi with stipends,” said Akhalkalaki Mayor Iricya
Nairi. “That’s great, we thought.” But Nairi claims local students
couldn’t pass the Georgian language university entry exams, which
were a result of the government’s education reforms.

Darbinyan says that he doesn’t understand how people are expected to
learn Georgian well enough to pass exams, when they have few chances to
learn it. Out of Akhalkalaki’s five secondary schools, only one teaches
courses in Georgian. Three teach in Armenian and one in Russian.

Mayor Nairi cites the recent influx of Georgian students to the
Akhalkalaki branch of Tbilisi State University as further evidence
that the government does not want to treat ethnic Armenians equally.

After Georgian students were brought to Akhalkalaki to study for
free, Nairi charged, the number of Armenians studying at the local
university dropped to four. By contrast, he said, under former
president Eduard Shevardnadze 60 percent of the university’s 650
students were Armenian. “Why would they open a university here and
bring Georgians if they didn’t plan to change the demographics of
our region?” he wondered.

Deputy Education and Science Minister Bela Tsipuria, however,
rejects the contention. “The only reason Georgian students are
studying in Akhalkalaki is because the competition to study there is
lower than in Tbilisi or Kutaisi,” Tsipuria stated. Complaints about
the difficulty of Georgia’s new university entrance exams were not
limited to Javakheti, she added. “Young people today have to work
hard to compete in modern Georgia. This is an entirely new concept.”

Tsipuria argues that Javakheti’s problems have more to do with a lack
of educational opportunities than language – a problem not unique to
Samtskhe-Javakheti. President Saakashvili, she stressed, has promised
that hundreds of Armenian students will have the opportunity to
receive sufficient education to find work within the civil service.

The government is currently training teachers and introducing new
methodology, Tsipuria continued. “But people don’t understand these
things take time.”

First Deputy Governor Amirkhanyan believes that education reform must
be accomplished while taking the interests of national minorities
into account. “We must learn Georgian if we want to get ahead. It
would be easier on all levels, from civic positions to farmers who
commute to Tbilisi to sell their goods.”

The issue seems to spill over easily into other areas, as well. The
February dismissal of three ethnic Armenian judges for allegedly having
an insufficient knowledge of Georgian has generated considerable
resentment. “If you don’t know the state language, then you must
go!” commented Nairi.

Similarly, the archbishop’s office was targeted by locals who assume
that the Georgian Orthodox Church is attempting to exercise excessive
influence in the region. The office was rumored to contain a cache
of weapons. The cache never materialized.

Calls have gone out recently for Samtskhe-Javakheti to be made an
autonomous region, with broader self-governance rights, and for
Armenian to be named the region’s official language. Local leaders
and most activists, however, maintain that protests against perceived
cultural assimilation should not be interpreted as a separatist
drive. Said Javakheti Citizens Forum Chairman Darbinyan: “They call
us separatists because we’re asking for cultural autonomy, but we
want democracy and decentralization.”

Editor’s Note: Paul Rimple is a freelance journalist based in Tbilisi.

BAKU: Kazimirov:”Date And Venue Of Presidents’ Meetings Shouldn’t Be

KAZIMIROV: “DATE AND VENUE OF PRESIDENTS’ MEETINGS SHOULDN’T BE PUBLICIZED TO ACHIEVE ANY RESULT”

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
March 30 2006

“I am not in a state of neither pessimism nor euphoria after
Rambouillet talks yielding no result. Having these feelings impedes
settlement process. It is not surprising that Rambouillet talks ended
fruitlessly,” OSCE Minsk Group ex-co-chair Vladimir Kazimirov stated
(APA). Russian diplomat thinks that it is necessary to continue the
negotiations and new meetings in the level the sides decide.

“But it is superfluous to create a show about these meetings. Before
presidents’ meetings, some try to indicate their dreams as a reality,
some concern that presidents may make concession. As a result, before
the meetings, presidents begin to promise that they will not make
concession, the opposite side should make a compromise. International
affairs should be conducted in this manner; it is needed to put
an end to these shows. Meetings should be held in working regime,
if the sides show interest to settlement process, no information
should be publicized about the meetings beforehand. Or, if the sides
aren’t interested in resolution of the conflict, then this show can
be continued”.

As always, Vladimir Kazimirov proposed that negotiations’ format
should be changed; separatist regime in Nagorno Garabagh should be
involved in the process as a conflicting side.

NKR MFA Statement

NKR MFA STATEMENT

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
March 30 2006

Current March 29, in the course of a monitoring held by the OSCE
mission to the East of the populated locality of Seysulan of the NKR
Martakert region, the units of the Azeri Armed Forces violated the
case-fire, having fired the NKR Armed Forces. To guarantee security of
the participants of the monitoring the OSCE Chair-in-Office’s Personal
representative Andrzey Kasprzyk rendered a decision to suspend it.

Drawing the international community’s attention to the repeated
facts of violation of the Azeri-Karabakh contact line by the Azeri
military units that have recently become regular, the NKR Ministry
of Foreign Affairs finds it necessary to state that the actions are
direct consequence of the Azeri leadership’s incessant belligerent
rhetoric that has not been properly estimated by the concerned states
and organizations.

The mediators’ attempts to confer equal responsibility on all the
parties of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict for the case-fire violation
create prerequisites of impunity of Azerbaijan as the violations’
real culprit, which is absolutely inadmissible.

In this connection the MFA believes any silent support of the conflict
parties may result in upsetting equilibrium and destabilization in
the South Caucasus.

BAKU: Government Blasts Russian Art Critic For Vandalism Claim

GOVAERMENT BLASTS RUSSIAN ART CRITIC FOR VANDALISM CLAIM

AzerNews Weekly, Azerbaijan
March 30 2006

The Azerbaijani government has condemned a Russian culture worker’s
recent statement concerning the alleged destruction of ancient graves
in Azerbaijan’s exclave of Nakhchivan.

Mikhail Piotrovski of Armenian descent, who heads the Hermitage, one
of the largest museums in the world and is a correspondent member
of the Russian Academy of Sciences, went as far as describing the
alleged destruction of Armenian tombstone crosses in Julfa, Nakhchivan
Autonomous Republic, as a crime. In a statement, the Ministry of
Culture and Tourism said the utterances by Piotrovski and distortion
of historic facts showed that he is misinformed on the matter.

In 1960s, after an appeal by the Armenian Catalicos [clerical leader]
to then Soviet leadership, the tombstones in Upper (Nagorno) Garabagh
and Julfa cemeteries were transferred to Armenia. Moreover, other
ancient tombstones dating back to the period of Caucasus Albania were
stolen from five Azerbaijani districts and also moved to Armenia. The
views of Armenian historians, who politicized the issue and distorted
the facts were reflected in the mentioned statements by the Russian
cultural figure, the Ministry indicated. The statement said further
that Armenian barbarians, ignoring the demands of UNESCO and other
international organizations, continue to pursue their policy of
aggression. It warned that Piotrovski’s views do not reflect those
of influential and unbiased Russian historians and scholars.

Piotrovski’s statement and his inclination to mix science with
politics comes as no surprise due to his origin. His mother is of
Armenian descent, while his father is an academician of the Armenian
Academy of Sciences.

“Construction And Renovation. Expo-2006” Exhibition To Open Today In

“CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION. EXPO-2006” EXHIBITION TO OPEN TODAY IN YEREVAN

ArmRadio.am
30.03.2006 10:55

The third international “Construction and renovation. Expo-2006”
professional exhibition will open today in Yerevan.

Business meetings will also be held in the framework of the exhibition.

These create real perspectives for the increase of foreign
investments in the country, as well as provide opportunities to local
construction companies in regard to international cooperation and
market enlargement.

World Bank Gives Armenia Grant And Credit To Support Renewable Energ

WORLD BANK GIVES ARMENIA GRANT AND CREDIT TO SUPPORT RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECT

Armenpress
Mar 30 2006

YEREVAN, MARCH 30, ARMENPRESS: The World Bank approved on March
29 a Renewable Energy Project for Armenia. The total amount of the
project is US$25.050 million, including a US$5 million International
Development Association (IDA) credit, and a US$3 million grant from
the Global Environment Facility (GEF). The project will also be
supported by co-financing of US$7 million from EBRD, US$3 million
from the Cafesjian Family Foundation, and US$7.050 million from the
government and local financial institutions.

This project will assist the government to increase privately owned
and operated power generation utilizing renewable energy and to reduce
greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide) emissions by overcoming barriers
to the development of renewable energy. Following the energy crisis
Armenia has achieved remarkable results in reforming the power sector
and improving its financial performance. The key remaining challenge
for the sector is to ensure sustainable and reliable power supply by:
(a) shifting reliance from costly and polluting sources of energy to
lower cost and environmentally friendly alternatives; (b) increasing
the energy diversification and achieving a higher degree of energy
security through the utilization of the indigenous renewable energy
resources.

While the overall legal and regulatory framework in Armenia is
supportive to the development of renewable resources, private
investments in renewable projects are impeded by a number of legal,
regulatory, informational, financial, and institutional barriers.

The Renewable Energy Project will provide assistance to remove the
existing barriers and debt financing, as well as technical, legal,
managerial and business support to a selected number of renewable
projects.

“The project will increase the role of renewable resources in
Armenia’s electricity generation mix in the future thereby increasing
the diversification of electricity supply and energy security,”-
said Gevorg Sargsyan, Head of the World Bank team designing the
project. “It will also generate environmental benefits by reducing
emissions and pollution.”

The overarching goal of the project is to build a sustainable
market-based capacity to develop and finance renewable energy projects
on commercial terms.

The Renewable Energy Project has two components: (i) assistance
to remove barriers and support project implementation; and (ii)
financing of investment. IDA and grant funds will be channeled through
the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Fund, which will provide
finance to private investors through a financial intermediary.

By the time of completion, the project is expected to contribute to
the development of about 80MW of additional renewable energy generation
capacity, adding 200GWh annual renewable generation to the electricity
generation mix. In addition, carbon dioxide emissions are expected to
be lowered by around 130,000 tons annually. The Credit will be made
to Armenia on standard IDA terms, including 40 years maturity and a
10-year grace period.

Since joining the World Bank in 1992 and IDA in 1993, the commitments
to Armenia total approximately US $921 million for 42 operations.

Political Problems Made Armenian Companies More Flexible

POLITICAL PROBLEMS MADE ARMENIAN COMPANIES MORE FLEXIBLE

Lragir.am
28 March 06

Michael Davy, the regional director of the European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia,
Belarus and Moldavia announced in Yerevan on March 28 that the EBRD
granted a loan of 20 million euros to four Armenian banks.

According to Michael Davy, the funding involves a rather wide range
of spheres: pharmaceutics, energy, insurance, etc. At the same time,
the EBRD representative pointed out the importance of diversity of
activities of Armenian companies and the search for new international
partners, informs the news agency ARKA.

Michael Davy said the Armenian companies have become more flexible
due to the political problems that the Armenian economy is facing.

Baku Outraged By Millennium Challenge Account Providing Grant ToArme

BAKU OUTRAGED BY MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE ACCOUNT PROVIDING GRANT TO ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
28.03.2006 21:02 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Providing grants to Armenia and Georgia within
the Millennium Challenge Account outraged Azerbaijan’s leaders. Many
Azeri media noted “the US did not experience gratitude feelings and
allow dual standard policy regarding Azerbaijan, though the country’s
Government has provided a number of political and economic benefits
and preferences to the US.” Besides, “providing that type of financial
assistance to Armenia does not suit the neutral position of a state,
which has assumed the responsibility of a mediator at settlement of
the Karabakh conflict,” reports Irna.

BAKU: Azeri Leader Threatens Armenia With War As He Opens Museum AtS

AZERI LEADER THREATENS ARMENIA WITH WAR AS HE OPENS MUSEUM AT SECURITY MINISTRY

ANS TV, Baku
27 Mar 06

[Presenter] Despite Armenia’s nonconstructive position, the peace
potential has not yet been exhausted. But Armenia must know that
Azerbaijan can regain its territories through war at any moment,
President Ilham Aliyev has told the opening of the Heydar Aliyev museum
at the Heydar Aliyev Academy of the National Security Ministry as he
presented a military banner to the academy.

[President Aliyev, shown speaking to the ceremony] I think that the
peace potential has not yet been exhausted. Therefore, we will of
course remain faithful to the peace process.

But at the same time, we must be ready for any eventuality and that
is why Azerbaijan has stepped up its army building efforts in recent
years. Our military spending has increased over the past years, and
it will increase further. This is our sovereign right, this is our
job. Our country is in a state of war.

Our territorial integrity has been violated. Our sovereignty has
been violated. Therefore, the increase in military spending is only
natural. [Azerbaijan’s] economy should be strong in order to achieve
this. And, as you know, we are paying a lot of attention to economic
reforms.

Therefore, I would like to reiterate that the settlement of the
Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict depends on diplomatic, political,
economic and military factors.

The opposite side must know that Azerbaijan is capable of securing
its territorial integrity through war at any moment. This is what
they should know.