Armenian Quake Victims Linger In Poverty

NBC-4, California
Jan 19 2005

Armenian Quake Victims Linger In Poverty

Thousands Remain In Substandard Housing After 1988 Disaster

by Associated Press

GYUMRI, Armenia — The sliding doors of the battered Soviet railroad
car that Artak Akopian calls home reveal a small space almost as icy
as the outdoors. The makeshift quarters are decorated by little but
an old photograph of his mother, who was killed in the earthquake
that devastated Armenia in December 1988.

Akopian, then age 4, was at nursery school when the quake struck,
killing 25,000 people and leaving half a million homeless. Like the
tsunami that devastated southern Asia last month, the disaster
focused the world’s attention on the region and brought forth an
outpouring of aid.

“The aid was colossal, unexpectedly massive,” said Fadei Sarkisian,
who headed the government of Armenia at the time of the quake, when
it was a Soviet republic.

A look back at the aid effort shows successes and failures: More than
$1.2 billion of domestic and foreign aid was given for medical needs,
clothing, food and new housing. But thousands, like Akopian, remain
in substandard housing — 2,000 families according to government
estimates, some 7,000 families according to journalists who have
studied the problem.

The quake shook the mountains of northern Armenia just as Mikhail
Gorbachev was opening the Soviet Union to the West. He cut short a
summit with outgoing President Ronald Reagan — where he had
announced military cuts and pledged support for human rights — to
rush home.

The international aid effort “wouldn’t have been so big without
Gorbachev. It was a milestone in the history of the Cold War,” said
John Evans, who is now U.S. ambassador to Armenia and was involved in
the earthquake relief effort. “The initial response — there was no
question about it — was all-out.”

Less than two weeks after the quake, Soviet authorities said they had
received $100 million in aid from 77 countries. An Armenian official
in the Central Committee of Armenia’s Communist Party at the time of
the quake said on condition of anonymity that earthquake-related aid
through 1992 totaled $1.2 billion to $1.3 billion. About 40 percent
came from abroad.

The United States sent heating stoves and search-dog teams. Britain
sent ultrasonic listening devices and fiber-optic cameras for
searching the rubble. Clothing and medical equipment came from around
the world.

Sarkisian recalled standing by rubble and hearing cries for help; but
he knew the powerful cranes needed to lift the concrete slabs on top
of them would take days to assemble. Two days after the quake, cranes
arrived from Italy and Germany, saving, he said, thousands of people.

Akopian’s mother was not among them. Along with his younger brother,
she was killed when the 6.9-magnitude quake destroyed their
apartment. Akopian’s father survived but became mentally unbalanced
and later died.

Now 20, Akopian lives with his aunt, her two children and his wife in
the cramped, corroding railroad car — part of a jumble of cargo
containers and other tiny shelters huddled in a hollow in Gyumri,
Armenia’s second-largest city, which was called Leninakan in the
Soviet era.

The hard-scrabble neighborhood illustrates the desperation that
persists despite the recovery effort that has restored a semblance of
normal life to Gyumri and even Spitak, a town where the quake left
only a handful of buildings standing and killed about half the
population of 20,000.

Gorbachev pledged to rebuild the devastated area, but the 1991 Soviet
collapse scuttled that effort and plunged Armenia into an economic
crisis.

As Armenians across the newly independent country chopped down trees
in parks and chopped up furniture to heat their homes, the
quake-stricken area become just another region where residents
struggled to survive. Into the early 1990s, the earthquake zone was
still shattered and demoralized.

Karlen Ambartsumian, who was deputy mayor of Gyumri when the quake
struck and now advises the current mayor, put part of the blame on a
decrease in foreign aid following the initial, emotionally-driven
interest.

“It should have been more prolonged — not just to aid at the time
when the whole world is talking about it and then forget, but to
continue, step by step, doing what is needed at each stage,”
Ambartsumian said.

He said what’s needed most in Gyumri, where dozens of factories are
idle and unemployment is staggering, is aid in the form of job
creation.

“When a U.N. official asked me how much flour we needed, I told him:
Send us fishing rods, not fish,” said Simon Ter-Simonian, head of the
government’s humanitarian assistance department.

While Sarkisian said the aid effort in the quake’s wake was
well-coordinated, Ambartsumian said distribution was badly flawed and
that people who suffered the most missed a lot of the aid, which was
handed out while they were looking for loved ones’ bodies.

“Everybody sent aid, but nobody was able to organize its fair
distribution,” Ambartsumian said.

Sofia Airopetian, a 73-year-old Spitak resident, though, tells a
different story. She says the world never forgot the earthquake
victims and that she still receives food aid. Last year she moved out
of a cargo container and into one of several new apartments built
under a program funded by Armenian-American Kirk Kerkorian.

The new housing beneath the mountains that shadow Spitak augments
homes and hospitals built by foreign countries following the quake.

A U.S. Agency for International Development program has enabled more
than 7,000 families to move out of temporary housing, ridding Gyumri
of many of the metal shacks that survivor Gayane Markarian called a
constant reminder of the quake that killed her brother.

After 15 years in a temporary home near Akopian’s railroad car,
Markarian and her family of five are preparing to move back to their
old building, finally renovated after the quake. But her 18-year-old
son Vigen fears the lack of jobs will force him into the army.

Across the dirt road, 30-year-old Ella Voskanian said she, her mother
and 12-year-old daughter have no hope of leaving their dilapidated
metal container because they are not eligible for other housing for
bureaucratic reasons. At the time of the quake, they were registered
at a home that belongs to relatives.

“We have nowhere to go,” she said.

46 Armenian troops depart for Iraq on humanitarian mission

Agence France Presse — English
January 18, 2005 Tuesday 3:01 PM GMT

Forty-six Armenian troops depart for Iraq on humanitarian mission

YEREVAN

A group of 46 Armenian soldiers flew off from here Tuesday aboard a
US C-130 transport plane on a humanitarian mission to Iraq where they
will serve under Polish command for one year.

“This day is very important for Armenian armed forces.

We cannot stay away from international processes geared toward
promoting stability and peace in our region, particularly in Iraq,”
said Defense Minister Serge Sarkissian as he addressed the troops
before they departed for Baghdad via Kuwait.

The minister said the 46 soldiers — three doctors, 10 bomb disposal
experts, 30 drivers and three senior officers — would be deployed in
the Shiite holy city of Karbala and nearby al-Hila.

Late last month, the Armenian parliament approved a controversial
government plan to send troops and medics to join the US-led
coalition in Iraq.

Ninety-one deputies voted in favour of the proposal with 23 against
and one abstention, despite fears from opposition groups that the
deployment would endanger the large Armenian diaspora in the Arab
world.

Opposition parties and youth organizations warned that insurgents
could target the some 20,000 ethnic Armenians in Iraq if the troops
join the US-led campaign.

NY Life Insurance Settlement First Tranche of $3mil Disbursed

ARMENIAN INSURANCE SETTLEMENT FUND BOARD
Post Office Box 5053
Portland, OR 97208-5053
U.S.A.

PRESS RELEASE
January 14, 2005
Contact: Board Member Paul Krekorian
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])
818-848-7750

ARMENIAN INSURANCE SETTLEMENT FUND BOARD
DELIVERS FIRST $3 MILLION TO ARMENIAN CHARITIES

The Armenian Insurance Settlement Fund Board released the sum of $3
million last week for distribution to nine Armenian charitable
organizations. The funds were the first distributions from the
proceeds of the settlement in Marootian v. New York Life Insurance Co.

The Marootian case was a class action suit filed in United States
District Court by the heirs of Armenians who had purchased life
insurance from New York Life in the Ottoman Empire prior to 1915. The
heirs contend that upon the deaths of the policyholders, many of whom
were murdered by Turks during the Armenian Genocide, New York Life did
not pay the benefits on these policies.

Last year, New York Life agreed to settle the class action suit by
paying a total of $20 million, including up to $11 million for the
heirs of the policyholders, at least $3 million for specified Armenian
charities, and $6 million for attorneys’ fees and administrative
expenses.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the initial $3 million
distribution is to be divided equally by the AGBU, the Armenian Relief
Society, the Armenian Education Foundation, the Armenian Missionary
Association, the Armenian Catholic Church, both the Eastern and
Western Dioceses of the Armenian Church of North America, and both the
Eastern and Western Prelacies of the Armenian Apostolic Church. The
Settlement Fund Board released these funds to the attorneys for the
plaintiffs in the case, who will deliver the checks to the charities.
In addition, the Settlement Fund Board released the funds allocated by
the settlement agreement to various named plaintiffs, including lead
plaintiff Martin Marootian.

The Settlement Fund Board is an independent panel appointed by
California State Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi for the purpose
of evaluating the claims of individuals who contend they are heirs who
are entitled to compensation from New York Life under the agreement
and distributing the funds allocated by the settlement agreement. The
Board members are attorney and law professor Berj Boyajian; attorney
and Burbank Board of Education Vice President Paul Krekorian; and
physician and health care activist Viken Manjikian.

The Board is scheduled to begin considering individual claims in
March.

Anyone who believes there is even a possibility that they are the heir
of a New York Life policyholder whose benefits were not paid must
submit a “Notice of Claim” form to the Settlement Fund Board in order
to avoid waiving the right to recover. All Notice of Claim forms must
be postmarked no later than March 16, 2005. Claims may come from
anywhere in the world.

For further information or to obtain a Notice of Claim form, please
call the toll free information line at 1-866-422-0124 or visit
The website includes a
partial list of policyholders, but it is not necessary that your
ancestor’s name appear on the list in order to submit a Notice of
Claim.

http://www.armenianinsurancesettlement.com/

French Armenians demand to adopt bill condemning denial of Genocide

PanArmenian News
Jan 14 2005

FRENCH ARMENIANS DEMAND TO ADOPT BILL CONDEMNING DENIAL OF ARMENIAN
GENOCIDE

14.01.2005 14:19

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ One of the Armenian organizations of France – VAN
(Armenian vigilance against denial) – is demanding to adopt the
additional second item to the bill on the Armenian Genocide
recognition. This item, in the opinion of the initiators, should
state active or passive denial of the genocide as a punishable
offence. January 25 members of the initiative group will give a press
conference in one of the halls of the French National Assembly.

Improving Turkish-Russian Relations

roving-turkish-russian.html

January 12, 2005
Article | Improving Turkish-Russian Relations

Mavi Boncuk
Analysis of Near East Policy from the scholars and associates of THE WASHINGTON
INSTITUTE
942 January 12, 2005

Improving Turkish-Russian Relations: Turkey’s New Foreign Policy and Its
Implications for the United States

By Soner Cagaptay and Nazli Gencsoy

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan finished his three-day visit to
Moscow today. This trip follows Russian president Vladimir Putin’s December
2004 Turkey trip, the first by a Russian head of state since Russia and the
Ottoman Empire established relations in the fifteenth century – excluding a 1972
sojourn by Nikolai Podgorny, the titular head of state of the former Soviet
Union. Although Erdogan’s visit fell short of finalizing a number of pipeline
construction and gas export deals, twin Putin-Erdogan visits herald a new era
of improved Turkish-Russian relations. What is the background of this
development, and what are its implications for the U.S.?

Background: Conflictual Relations. During the Cold War and in the 1990s,
Turkish-Russian relations were characterized by tension. Throughout the Cold
War, Turkey, which was on NATO’s southern flank against the Soviet Union, was
suspicious of Moscow, which asked for control of the Turkish Straits (Bosporus
and Dardanelles) in 1946. In the early 1990s, as the Soviet Union fell apart,
Turkey acted to fill the power vacuum in Central Asia and the Caucasus by
developing close ties with Georgia and Azerbaijan. Russia, on the other hand,
supported Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict against Azerbaijan while
backing separatist movements in Georgia. These policies put the two countries
at odds. Along the same pattern, Turkey’s sympathy for Chechen rebels in the
1990s coincided with Russia becoming a safe haven for the Kurdish terrorist
group the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK).

Cooperation in the Present Decade: Booming Economic Ties. Over the last few
years, however, Russia and Turkey have shifted their mutual foreign policy,
paving the way to the twin visits. Booming trade is a sign of improved
relations between the two countries. For the first eleven months of 2004,
Russian-Turkish trade was worth $9.4 billion, 50 percent more than in 2003.
Gas and oil deals: Natural gas constitutes around 68 percent of Russian exports
to Turkey, which imports 70 percent of its gas from Russia and is the second
largest consumer of Russian gas after Germany. In December 1997, Turkey and
Russia signed an agreement establishing the Blue Stream Pipeline to operate
between the two countries and transfer 565 billion cubic feet per year of
Russian natural gas. The Blue Stream pipeline started operating in 2003;
however, a disagreement between the two countries about the exact price of gas
remains.

Pillars of the New Turkish-Russian Relationship: the View from Ankara. During
Putin’s visit to Turkey, Ankara and Moscow signed six agreements for
cooperation in the defense and energy industries. In addition, the two
countries issued a declaration for `deepening friendship and multidimensional
partnership.’ From Ankara’s perspective, together with the personal
relationship between Erdogan and Putin, the following factors are facilitating
better relations with Russia.
North-south axis on the energy corridor: With the construction of the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, which will start operating this year, Turkey is
now a key country on the east-west axis of the energy corridor between Central
Asia and the Mediterranean. Ankara now aspires to become a player on the
north-south energy axis from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean. A major
Turkish concern regarding the transfer of oil from the Black Sea is the
bottleneck in the Bosporus, a narrow zigzagging waterway half a mile wide.
Increased tanker traffic through the Bosporus may lead to catastrophic
accidents and environmental disasters for downtown Istanbul on this waterway.
Accordingly, the following pipelines bypassing the Bosporus are now being
discussed:
– Trans-Thrace pipeline – would transfer oil from Kiyikoy, on the Black Sea coast
of Turkish Thrace, to Kibrikbaba on the Saros Gulf in the northern Aegean. The
pipeline, with the ability to transport 60 million tons per year, would be
approximately 193 kilometers long. Together with loading facilities it would
cost around $900 million. Russia supports this project despite concerns from
Turkey over potential tanker traffic in the environmentally sensitive Saros
Gulf.
– Samsun-Kirikkale-Ceyhan pipeline – would transfer Russian oil across Turkey,
from Samsun on the Black Sea coast to Yumurtalik (Ceyhan) on the Mediterranean.
The project, favored by Ankara, would cost an estimated $1 billion and would be
510 kilometers long.
Business lobbies’ interest in Russia: Many business groups benefiting from
booming bilateral trade, including those in the construction, retail, banking,
telecommunications, food and beverage, glass, and machinery industries are
pushing for stronger political ties with Moscow – with more than 600 businessmen
accompanying Erdogan – to increase their access to the Russian market, and take
advantage of the awaiting energy deals.
Cooperation in the War on Terror in Chechnya: In the 1990s, Russia often accused
Ankara of ignoring the activities of Chechen activists who used Turkey, home to
large immigrant communities from the north Caucasus, including Chechnya, as a
safe haven. In a gesture before Putin’s visit, the Istanbul police detained
twelve people believed to be Chechen militants. In return, Russia is now
examining Turkish demands to put the PKK on its list of terrorist groups.

Concrete Progress? Despite the latest developments, including closer ties on
Black Sea security issues (See PolicyWatch no. 924) and the announcement that
the two countries will conduct joint naval exercises in the Black Sea this
year – the litmus test of the improved relationship will be the answers to the
following questions: Will Turkey and Russia build genuine cooperation in the
war on terror? Will Putin’s rhetoric espousing the Turkish position in Cyprus
turn into actual support? Less likely, will Ankara switch to Russian arms in
place of Western and U.S. arms? On the energy front, will the two countries
finally agree on the price of Blue Stream gas, and will Russia opt for an
east-west trans-Balkan pipeline, bypassing the Bosporus and pipelines in
Turkey?

Improved Ties with Russia: Ankara’s New Foreign Policy. There would need to be
concrete foreign policy steps before the improvement in Turkish-Russian
relations constituted a full-fledged rapprochement. The following factors
behind this development are, nevertheless, important as the leitmotifs of
current Turkish foreign policy:
– `Neighborhood policy’: Since 1999, when the European Union (EU) declared
Turkey’s candidacy for membership, Ankara has strived to establish better
relations with its neighbors based on the EU notion of a `neighborhood policy.’
After significantly improving ties with Syria, Iran (see PolicyWatch no. 825),
and Greece – with which it had mostly poor relations in the 1990s – Ankara is now
intent on developing good ties with Russia.
– Foreign policy portfolio diversification: Most circles in Ankara believe that
unlike the EU or the United States, Russia treats Turkey as an equal partner.
They see enhanced relations with Russia as a counterweight to ties with the EU
and the United States, should Ankara run into problems with Washington with
regard to the war in Iraq or with Brussels during EU accession talks.
– `Strategic depth’: Based on the `strategic depth’ concept favored by the
Justice and Development Party (AKP) government, which states that Turkey will
become more powerful only if it develops better relations with its non-Western
neighbors (including Iran, Syria, and Russia), Ankara sees improved ties with
Russia in its interest.

Implications for the United States. As Washington becomes more engaged in
Turkey’s Middle Eastern and Eurasian neighborhoods, Turkey seems increasingly
eager to diversify its foreign policy portfolio while acting independently from
the United States. This orientation is likely to persist so long as the Iraq
issue separates Ankara and Washington, a factor that leads Turkey to look for
ways of complementing its relationship with the United States.

Soner Cagaptay is a senior fellow and the director of the Turkish Research
Program at The Washington Institute. Nazli Gencsoy, a Dr. Marcia Robbins-Wilf
young scholar, is a research assistant at the Institute.

http://maviboncuk.blogspot.com/2005/01/article-imp

ANKARA: Erdogan And Putin Get Together With Turkish Businessmen

TurkishPress.com
Thursday, January 13, 2005

Erdogan And Putin Get Together With Turkish Businessmen
Anadolu Agency: 1/12/2005

MOSCOW (AA) – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has stated that a
political will exists in Turkey and Russia to make mutual investments.
”Such investments could not have been imagined 10-15 years ago,” said
Erdogan.
In a meeting with Erdogan, President Putin remarked that Russia
supports the UN Secretary General Annan’s plan on Cyprus. ”We do not think
that the economic isolation of the Turkish Cypriots is fair,” told Putin.
Erdogan and Putin got together with Turkish businessmen in Moscow’s
President Hotel.
In a speech delivered at the meeting, President Putin stated that the
trade volume between Turkey and Russia will increase. ”Our trade volume
could easily reach 15 billion U.S. dollars and is expected to reach 25
billion U.S. dollars in 2007. Joint projects should also be encouraged,”
said Putin.
Putin stressed that the cooperation agreement he signed with the
Turkish President Ahmet Necdet Sezer on December 6, 2004, makes an important
reference to the good relations between Turkey and Russia.
”We pay high attention to Turkey’s relations with the European Union.
Half of our trade volume is with the EU states. With Turkey’s integration
into the EU, we are eager to make our relations better,” expressed Putin.
”In this framework, many obstacles could be eliminated. Obstacles could be
removed with Russia’s entrance into the World Trade Organization. We are
pleased with Turkey’s positive approach in this regard.”

-INVITATION TO VICTORY CEREMONIES-

”We will soon celebrate the 60th anniversary of the victory against
fascism. We would be happy to see Erdogan at the celebrations on May 9.
Erdogan’s visit will be a turning point in our relations. The year 2005 also
marks the 85th anniversary of the foundation of Turkish-Russian relations,”
said Putin.
Speaking after President Putin, PM Erdogan expressed that the good
relations between Turkish and Russian businessmen will not only help the two
countries but the whole region. ”Turkey will strongly support Russian
membership to the World Trade Organization. This question will be discussed
in Davos on January 24, 2005,” told Erdogan.
Meanwhile, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus Trade & Industry
Chamber Chairman Salih Tunar stated that, despite the Turkish Cypriots’
approval of the Annan Plan, the Turks still face blockade. ”We want the
isolation of Turkish Cypriots to end and wish to contribute to world
peace.”
Erdogan has reminded media members that a ”Russian Year” will be
celebrated in Turkey and a ”Turkish Year” will be celebrated in Russia in
the near future.
Putin added that he discussed the re-construction of Iraq with Erdogan.
”What is happening in Iraq is a matter of concern for the Russians. We will
work together with Turkey on Iraq and with the aim to solve (its)
problems,” remarked Putin.
According to Putin, Turkish and Russian delegations also discussed the
Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline, railways and means to make better use of the Black
Sea region.
In response to a Turkish journalist’s question on Cyprus, Putin
explained that Russia supports the Annan plan. ”We will vote in the
Security Council according to the document presented to the commission,”
told Putin.
Asked about what he thinks on the Karabagh issue, Putin said that
neighborly relations between Russia-Armenia, Turkey-Armenia and
Azerbaijan-Armenia should be developed. ”We are all aware about the
historical problems between Azerbaijan and Armenia. Russia will contribute
to the peace process,” he indicated.
Erdogan also expressed that Armenia must be positive in its approach to
find a solution. ”Turkey’s policy is based to find a lasting solution. If
Armenia claims that it does not recognize the Kars Agreement, this would be
a negative approach. The Ataturk Airport in Istanbul has been made available
for Armenian passenger flights. We do not want negative relations with any
of our neighbors, including Armenia. We will open our border with Armenia
for trade once we witness a positive approach from Armenia,” stressed
Erdogan.
(ES-ULG)

2005-01-11

Armenia hopes for Karabakh settlement progress in 2005

Interfax
Jan 11 2005

Armenia hopes for Karabakh settlement progress in 2005

Yerevan. (Interfax) – Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian hopes
that more progress will be made at this year’s negotiations aimed at
putting an end to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

“I think that the future talks will differ qualitatively from the
first round of these negotiations as we will address certain specific
aspects and details, whereas the first round dealt with general
principles,” Oskanian told Interfax.

“My meetings with the Azerbaijani foreign minister in 2004 generated
a wide variety of issues that will serve as a foundation for our
further talks,” he said.

“The more we go into details, the more complex the negotiations may
become. It is when we start to deal with their details that we should
be ready for compromises,” he said.

“Speaking about flexibility, I am referring to the negotiating
process itself and the parties’ readiness for compromises. Otherwise,
we will not be able to make progress. Everyone should assess the
situation and the capabilities of the other party realistically,
putting forth demands that will not run counter to these
capabilities,” Oskanian said.

The minister expressed hope that “achieved agreements will help us
make progress in resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in 2005.”

Tbilisi: South Caucasus Countries Discuss Regional Railway

Civil Georgia, Georgia
Jan 10 2005

South Caucasus Countries Discuss Regional Railway

Visiting Russian Transport Minister Igor Levitin will discuss the
issue of restoring the Georgian-Russian railway link via Abkhazia
with the Georgian leadership.

Armenian and Azerbaijani governmental delegations are also expected
to join the talks in Tbilisi on January 10.

Last November, Russian Transport Minister, who visited Georgia and
Armenia, proposed that the countries of the South Caucasus set up a
joint Russian-Georgian-Armenian-Azerbaijani company which would
restore traffic on the Trans-Caucasus Railway, which ceased
functioning after conflicts in Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh in the
early 90s.

The railway, which stretched more than 2,300 kilometers during Soviet
times, connected Black Sea ports with central Russia, operated
passenger services and handled more than 15 million tons of transit
cargo per year, according to the Russian English-language daily The
Moscow Times.

`It is not a simple issue, I mean, we do not face only technical
problems related to restoration of the railway. It is a comprehensive
and difficult political issue,’ Lexo Alexishvili, the Georgian
Economy Minister, said.

For the past decade the Georgian government’s policy has always
linked the issue of restoring the railway via Abkhazia to the issue
of returning the internally displaced persons to the breakaway
region.

There are signs that the Georgian government is now ready to soften
its position, but the final shape of the Tbilisi’s policy towards the
issue has yet to manifest.

`If Georgian custom officers will be deployed at the Georgian-Russian
border [referring to the Abkhaz section of the border] then I see no
problem in restoring the railway connection,’ Kakha Bendukidze, the
State Minister for Economic Reform Issues, told reporters on January
9.

Armenian minister stresses expansion of bilateral ties

IRNA, Iran
January 8, 2005 Saturday 5:26 PM EST

Armenian minister stresses expansion of bilateral ties

Armenian Minister of Education and Science Sergo Yeritsen stressed
the need for offering facilities to Iranian students and solving
their problems.

Making the remarks while talking to reporters in Yerevan on Friday on
the threshold of his visit to Iran, he described bilateral ties as
good and expanding.

Referring to the presence of about 1,200 Iranian students in
Armenia`s universities, he stressed the need for solving their
problems.

He is to visit Iran from January 15-19.

BAKU: FMs of Azerbaijan & Saudi Arabia sign memo

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
Jan 4 2005

FOREIGN MINISTERS OF AZERBAIJAN AND SAUDI ARABIA SIGN MEMO
[January 04, 2005, 20:51:58]

Foreign Ministers of Azerbaijan Elmar Mammadyarov now visiting Saudi
Arabia met with Custodian of the Twp Holy Mosques, King Fahd Bin
Abdulaziz Al Saud.

The Minister passed on the warmest greetings from President of
Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev to the King Fahd and the people of his
country and expressed confidence that the upcoming visit of the
Azerbaijani leader to the Kingdom would bring the existing relations
between the two countries up to a higher level.

On the same day, the Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan met with his
Saudi counterpart Said Al Feysal and invited him to visit Azerbaijan.
The parties also discussed such issues as development of political,
economic, cultural and humanitarian relations, fighting terror and
prospect of bilateral cooperation within international organizations.
They also touched upon the measures for peaceful resolution of the
Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, as well as exchanged
views on the peace process in the Middle East and Iraq.

Afterwards, the Foreign Ministers Elmar Mammadyarov of Azerbaijan and
Said Al Feysal of Saudi Arabia signed a Memorandum of Mutual
Understanding, which envisages holding talks and consultations
between the parties on international and regional issues in Baku and
Riyadh in a regular manner.

Following the signing ceremony, the Ministers gave a joint
press-conference.