Head of Armenian Aravot TV Resigns

HEAD OF ARMENIAN ARAVOT TV RESIGNS

Arminfo
15 Jul 04

YEREVAN

The executive director of the TV channel Aravot TV, Aram Abramyan, has
resigned from his post.

Abramyan told an Arminfo correspondent that he will explain his
resignation in the Aravot newspaper tomorrow. Abramyan is the
newspaper’s editor.

MP of the Armenian National Assembly Murad Guloyan bought the TV
company from MP Gurgen Arsenyan about two months ago. When he took up
the post, Abramyan told reporters that he would work as the channel’s
director till the first sign of pressure exerted on him by the
channel’s leadership.

Son of Armenian Senior Military Indicted of Beating US Citizen

SON ON ARMENIAN SENIOR MILITARY INDICTED OF BEATING US CITIZEN

15.07.2004 13:08

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Press Service of the Police of Armenia has confirmed
the reports that Armenian Armed Forces Chief of Staff, Colonel General
Mikayel Harutyunian’s son Arsen, 30, had beaten US citizen David Backer, 29.

The incident took place July 10 in one of Yerevan cafes. As the Armenian
Police told RFE/RL, addressing the law-enforcement bodies the same day David
Backer said two girls accompanying him were also beaten. One of them was
taken to hospital with heavy bodily injuries. The details of the incident
will become known when the investigation completes, the policemen said.

NATO: Moving from the Baltic to the Caucasus

Agency WPS
What the Papers Say. Part B (Russia)
July 9, 2004, Friday

NATO: MOVING FROM THE BALTIC STATES TO THE CAUCASUS

SOURCE: Nezavisimoe Voennoe Obozrenie, No. 25, July 9-15, 2004, pp.
1, 3

by Colonel Anatoly Tsyganok, Professor of the Academy of Military
Sciences

The latest NATO summit ended in Istanbul on June 29. The major issues
on the agenda were as follows: Iraq (how efforts can be pooled),
Afghanistan (how military might can be boosted), the Balkans (how to
have the European Union take over), and the preliminary results of
NATO expansion. The Russia-NATO Council met within the framework of
the summit. The meeting but enumerated the problems accumulated
between the partners without so much as an attempts to solve them.
Solution to the problem was postponed. The problems will be handled
on a different level at a different time.

As for Iraq, Washington and London demanded deployment of NATO troops
there. Leaders of France, Germany, and Turkey refused to have the
issue phrased in this manner, and participation in the coalition in
Iraq was left up to the individual countries, something every NATO
member state is to decide for itself. Neither did the summit support
the United States in the matter of training specialists for the Iraqi
army. In other words, tension and discord within the Alliance
remained a hard fact of life.

The summit voted to increase the NATO contingent in Afghanistan from
6,500 to 10,000. There are additional reports, however, indicating
that Washington intends to up its contingents attached to Central
Asian bases by 12,000 servicemen who are to be withdrawn from South
Korea.

The summit supported the assumption that NATO leaders still regard
Russia as a sort of “truncated USSR” even despite the almost 11 years
since the “Russian bourgeois revolution” of October 1993. The
impression is that documents for every new summit are prepared on the
basis of hopelessly outdated instructions.

NATO neophytes – the Baltic states particularly – are fast learners
and as such get the message. That is why Russia’s suggestions
concerning the adapted Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty
were not noticed by NATO leaders. On the other hand, had the Duma
ratified the document, say, half a year before the summit and not on
the eve of it, it would have enabled Russia to maneuver before the
summit and given it an ace for negotiations at the summit itself.

NATO leaders were quite tough and adamant on the subject of
withdrawing Russian troops from Georgia and Moldova. Moscow was
strongly recommended to keep its promises to the OSCE summit in
Istanbul. Moreover, ratification of the modified Treaty on
Conventional Arms in Europe was tied in with Russian withdrawal
commitments. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov called this approach
incorrect because “political agreements did not set the deadline.”
Moreover, these days there are new threats and challenges on the
southern borders of the Russian Federation, the ones that were absent
in the past. The matter concerns the possibility of missile launches
from the Iranian direction and expansion of the Islamic terrorism.
That is why interests of national security in the direction of the
Caucasus require Russian military presence in the region and a
considerable reinforcement of the antiaircraft defense component.
Deployment of new antiaircraft defense units in Armenia became the
first step in this direction.

It should be noted that the speech of President Mikhail Saakashvili
of Georgia at the summit was quite composed. Georgia (and other
countries of the Caucasus, it stands to reason to assume) understands
that in a potential conflict with Iran Tbilisi, Yerevan, and Baku
will find their only and powerful ally precisely in Russia.

Moscow confirmed its participation in counter-terrorism operation
Active Effort in the Mediterranean where it will be presented by two
or three ships of the Black Sea Fleet.

The summit decided to begin preparations to the membership of the
Balkans countries in the Alliance and to pay more attention to the
countries of the Caucasus and Central Asia where cooperation and
contacts were to be advanced. “Countries of the region strive for
rapprochement with the Euroatlantic structures,” NATO General
Secretary Jaap de Hoof Scheffer said. “Still, doing something behind
the back of Russia, our closest partner, will be stupid and unfair.”

In fact, similar statements were made in Brussels once when the
Alliance was preparing its expansion into the Baltic states. It
doesn’t take a genius therefore to guess what degree of importance
Moscow attaches to statements of this sort. “NATO still relies on
instructions concerning defense of its members more than on real
joint estimates of security in this or that region,” Lavrov said.

It is reasonable to assume that in the Caucasus and Central Asia the
Alliance will follow the scenario already tested in the Baltic
states. Prior to expansion into the Baltic states, NATO built three
radars there and linked the installations to the existing air control
system. It enabled NATO to monitor craft and launches in north-west
Russia. That done, the Alliance modernized the airfield near Siauliaj
in Lithuania. These days, it is the base of four Danish aircraft
patrolling borders of the Baltic states. Now that Scheffer mentioned
construction of “three bridges” (in the Mediterranean region,
Caucasus, Central Asia), it stands to reason to expect appearance of
several radar installations on the territories of these countries.
AWACS flights are not to be ruled out either – “for air corridor
protection,” of course.

It is clear that the Alliance needs all these “bridge-building” to
consolidate its military presence and, also importantly, to protect
its economic presence in the mentioned regions. This is NATO’s way of
showing to its future members (whose leaders attended the Istanbul
summit as guests) that their interests will be protected in the
course of preparations for membership.

Russia suggested closer cooperation between NATO and the Organization
of the CIS Collective Security Treaty and a collective security
concept for the Persian Gulf. In fact, it could have done better than
that. For example, it could have suggested a joint operation against
drugs in Afghanistan (within the framework of the counter-terrorism
operation there) and Central Asia to destroy poppy fields,
laboratories, and storage facilities there. Particularly since the
US-NATO contingents control the territory in Afghanistan
approximately equalling what the Soviet Army controlled in the 1980s.
Left to their own devices, neither NATO nor the Americans alone can
handle the worst threat to Europe and the world – production and
export of heavy drugs like heroin. Most poppy fields are in the
northern and central Afghanistan, the regions that do not recognize
the authorities in Kabul and where there are no foreign military
contingents. Scheffer says that more helicopters are needed for the
contingent in Afghanistan. The threat posed by drugs may be abated
only by joint effort of Russia, the United States, NATO, and their
allies in the anti-Taliban coalition.

BAKU: Minsk Group Co-chairs to Visit Region

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
July 8 2004

Minsk Group Co-chairs to Visit Region

Co-chairs of the Minsk group of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are planning to visit the region late
this week, ANS reported on Thursday.

The co-chairs, Yuri Merzlyakov of Russia, Stephen Mann of the United
States and Anri Jackolen of France will first arrive in the Armenian
capital of Yereven on July 10.

Then the mediators will visit Baku and Khankendi (Stepanakert), the
central town of Azerbaijan’s occupied Nagorno-Karabakh region.

Ararat wins at Armenian festival

The Gazette (Montreal, Quebec)
July 6, 2004 Tuesday Final Edition

Ararat wins at Armenian festival

YEREVAN, Armenia/

Atom Egoyan’s two-year-old movie Ararat won the top prize at the
Golden Apricot Film Festival of works by ethnic Armenian directors,
officials said yesterday. The

festival included 57 movies by directors from 20 countries. Egoyan is
a Canadian of Armenian heritage. The film depicts the plight of
Armenians in Ottoman Turkey.

NK among main issues of Russia-Armenia talks

ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
July 3, 2004 Saturday

Nagorno-Karabakh among main issues of Russia-Armenia talks

By Natalia Simorova, Natalia Krainova

MOSCOW

One of the main issues Russian and Armenian Foreign Ministers Sergei
Lavrov and Vardan Oskanyan will discuss during their talks in Moscow
will be the Nagorno-Karabakh problem, the Russian Foreign Ministry’s
spokesman Alexander Yakovenko said on Saturday in connection with the
planned visit by the Armenian foreign minister to Moscow due from
July 5-7.

Russia is ready to render assistance in the conflict settlement
process and be a guarantor for an agreement acceptable for the
parties.

The parties themselves should find a compromise solution to the
problem, the diplomat noted.

The talks will also focus on cooperation between the two countries
within the CIS, the Organisation of the Treaty on Collective Security
and the EURASEC and coordination of efforts of the foreign ministries
to improve the situation in the Caucasian region.

Among the priority subjects will be also trade and economic, cultural
and humanitarian cooperation.

Moscow and Yerevan are determined to take purposeful and necessary
moves on the bilateral and multilateral basis in fight against
terrorism, Yakovenko said.

Efficient practical cooperation between law-enforcement structures
and security services supports political cooperation in the area.

The visit by the Armenian foreign minister will give an additional
impetus to Russian-Armenian relations that have a durable legal
basis, the Russian diplomat noted.

Oskanyan is also planned to meet with Chairman of the State Duma’s
Committee on CIS Affairs and Relations with Compatriots Andrei
Kokoshin.

Premiere Convention Des Armeniens D’Europe Au Parlement Europeen

FEDERATION EURO-ARMENIENNE
pour la Justice et la Démocratie
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B – 1000 BRUXELLES
Tel./Fax : +32 (0) 2 732 70 27
E-mail : [email protected]
Web :

COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE
06 juillet 2004
Contact: Talline Tachdjian
Tel.: +32 (0)2 732 70 27

PREMIERE CONVENTION DES ARMENIENS D’EUROPE AU PARLEMENT EUROPEEN

Bruxelles, Belgique – A l’initiative de la Fédération Euro-Arménienne, la
première Convention des Arméniens d’Europe se déroulera au Parlement
européen à Bruxelles, les 18 et 19 octobre 2004. Ce rassemblement
paneuropéen sera le lieu d’expression des sensibilités et opinions qui
traversent les communautés arméniennes d’Europe sur les sujets qui les
concernent.

Les citoyens européens d’origine arménienne représentent aujourd’hui plus de
deux millions de personnes issues de trois grandes vagues d’immigration,
résultant du génocide perpétré par l’empire ottoman (1915) , de la guerre au
Proche-Orient (1975) et de la chute de l’URSS (1991). Parfaitement intégrés
dans la vie économique et socioculturelle de leur pays d’accueil, ils ont
néanmoins su préserver leur identité et leur intérêt pour les questions
arméniennes.

Cette convention devrait permettre de dégager des lignes de convergence sur
différents thèmes d’actualité liés aux mutation géopolitiques récentes ou
aux transformations socioéconomiques globales.

Les orateurs pourront s’exprimer dans le cadre de trois sessions :

– Cultures et identités arméniennes en Europe
– Relations Union européenne – Arménie
– Enjeux de l’élargissement de l’Union européenne

« L’ensemble des associations, groupements et organisations arméniennes d’
Europe est convié, quelles que soient la nature de leurs activités et
indépendamment de leurs orientations politiques ou religieuses. » a expliqué
Hilda Tchoboian, présidente de la Fédération Euro-Arménienne.

« Avec cette première convention européenne, nous ne visons pas la mise en
place d’une superstructure associative qui se substituerait à la diversité
des associations impliquées dans les questions arméniennes en Europe ; nous
ambitionnons plutôt de créer un espace d’expression par lequel se dégageront
des positions et des opinions qui font consensus dans les communautés d’
Europe. ». a-t-elle précisé.

La Fédération Euro-Arménienne va incessamment lancer des centaines d’
invitations aux associations arméniennes d’Europe et appelle d’ores et déjà
les responsables associatifs qui souhaitent participer à cette convention à
s’inscrire soit par retour de courrier, soit sur le site Internet de la
Fédération .

Elle appelle les associations dont elle n’aurait pas connaissance et qui n’
auraient pas été contactées à se manifester spontanément. Elle invite
également chacun à faire un écho aussi large que possible à cette annonce et
précise qu’un programme provisoire sera communiqué fin juillet.

La Fédération Euro-Arménienne attire l’attention sur le fait que cette
convention constitue une occasion unique de faire entendre aux responsables
politiques européens – parlementaires et membres de la Commission – les
questions qui préoccupent les Arméniens d’Europe.

http://www.feajd.org
www.eafjd.org

Sudanese Supplementary School: Strengthening Diversity, Bilingualism

Mathaba.Net, Africa
June 30 2004

Sudanese Supplementary School: Strengthening Diversity, Promoting
Bilingualism

What is the former governor of Darfur, Eltigani Seisi Ateem, doing at
the Sudanese Supplementary School (SSS) off Edgware Road in
Paddington Green? Taking his little daughter to Arabic lessons,
socialising with other parents and discussing the work of the Darfur
Civil Organisations Campaign.

The school is the epicentre of London’s Sudanese community. The first
to arrive on Saturday mornings is the Chairman, Dr Ahmed El Dawi,
carrying an impressive bill board with SSS in Arabic and English. The
large black letters compliment the red lettering above of Westminster
College. The building is quickly transformed into little Sudan: in
the cafeteria Sudanese women sell traditional cloth, families meet,
letters are translated into English and Arabic, students are praised
and admonished.

>From 10am the children, aged from five to 16 start arriving – some on
foot, others in the car with their proud parents. The bright pinks
and reds of traditional clothes and veils contrast with plainer,
conventional Western dress. The hive of activity intensifies
throughout the day. People arrive asking about friends who may have
just come to London, friends are re-united, new friendships are made,
old friends exchange news. A sign in Arabic above the pay phone in
the cafeteria says children must be supervised when making calls. The
school had problems with youngsters dialing 999. Now they don’t use
the phone without an adult present.

A thriving, multiethnic institution (Iraqis, Algerians, Egyptians,
Moroccans, Eritreans and mixed race children attend), established ten
years ago, the school has over 300 pupils and more than 30 voluntary
teachers, managers and assistants. Politics are left outside the gate
and most of the pupils get on well with one another. The GCSE Arabic
pass rate is 100 percent and many candidates score high grades.
Classes are held from 10am to 2pm, 35 Saturdays throughout the year
and include English, Maths, Arabic and Cultural Studies. Music is now
part of the curriculum: cultural events and sports are organised each
term: there is a series of lectures for parents on Sudanese history
and aspects of art, music and culture.

More than 70 students are on the waiting list. The fee is £100 but
sixty percent of the parents can’t afford it. “The SSS feels it is
immoral and unacceptable to reject non-paying pupils as they are most
in need of the school’s assistance and support”, emphasised Dr El
Dawi who spends a lot of time trying to raise funds and digging deep
into his own pocket. There is a shortage of books and local charities
have been contacted for assistance. “Everybody does their bit”, Dr El
Dawi emphasised. The list of funders is impressive and includes the
Paddington Development Fund, the Paddington Association for
Supplementary Schools, the Edward Harvest Trust, the Bridge House
Trust and the City of Westminster.

“We have opted for total transparency. We will be crystal clear –
there is no hidden agenda or any ulterior motives. The goal is to
enhance our children’s education and promote their social
integration. This is becoming a daunting task as many refugees and
asylum seekers decide to remain in the UK indefinitely”, Dr El Dawi
said.

“Identity recognition is essential”, emphasised the former
co-ordinator who teaches Quran recitation. Overflowing with
enthusiasm she is a modest, eloquent woman who came to Britain in
1994 to join her husband who left Sudan ‘ for political reasons’ and
does not want her name in print. “It is vital for the children to be
valued and recognised as human beings. The school gives their social
identity a boost. It is not just about learning Arabic. Most of the
parents are refugees on income support or asylum seekers and need a
lot of support and assistance in making the transition to life in
Britain while at the same time maintaining their cultural identity.

Amira Faisal, the activities co-ordinator responsible for sports and
social affairs, who has lived in Britain for the past 20 years does
not begin teaching until 2pm. Badmington, football, basketball,
football, table tennis, rugby and games for the younger children are
on the programme and the annual sports day is a major event in the
school’s calander. But Ms Faisal arrives early to assist and advise
parents many of whom speak little or no English. She has three
children in the school herself – the sports instructor was once a
pupil.

“Learning about Sudanese traditions is very important. The children
have to know about their background and cultural heritage. We don’t
want them to forget these things because they are not in Sudan. At
home the parents may be keen to learn English and will not speak to
the children in Arabic. They start forgetting their langauge and feel
left out when guests come and they cannot follow the conversation”.

The children, from the youngest to the oldest, feel learning Arabic
is important. “We learn Arabic here and speak like we do in my
country”, said Aziza (7). “We have fun, everyone speaks Arabic and
English. It is fun to speak both languages. We play a lot of games
and have fun.”, said Nadia (11) She has visited Sudan four times and
was feeling sad because one of her cousins died. “He was younger then
me”. The older children are ambitious: one wants to be child
psychologist, another a doctor, another an engineer. Some are
focusing on music but for everyone learning Arabic is a top priority.

“I am doing GCSE in Arabic”, said Hana (15). It is a good subject for
me as I have experience in it. At school I get together with lots of
Sudanese people. Its good to be with people from your own country and
speak your language”.

The 15 classes are small, often with no more than ten children and
two teachers who love every minute they spend sharing their knowledge
with the students. The younger children come forward eagerly with
their exercise books and explain they are learning the Arabic
alphabet. The older students are serious and determined to succeed.

Many would like to visit Sudan. The schools activities, described in
detail on a professionally designed website ,
include sending volunteers to teach in rural schools in Sudan for up
to six months through the Sudan Volunteer Programme. The school also
co-operates with the Abdel Karim Mirghani Culture Centre in Omdruman
in the production of a bi lingual magazine, Nafaj which is sold as a
fund-raising venture.

The origins of supplementary and mother-tongue schools in Great
Britain can be associated with the presence of immigrant and refugee
children in British schools which goes back hundreds of years. The
Armenian refugees, for example, settled in Britain 700 years ago: the
French Hugonots came in the 17th century and the Jews from Eastern
Europe entered Britain between 1880 and 1914. But more recent
developments in this area of supplementary education can be largely
attributed to the efforts of black and Asian communities in this
country. The 1997 EEC directive of which the UK is a signatory,
obliges member states to promote the teaching of mother-tongue. In
the London area alone 275 minotiry languages are spoken by school age
children.

The SSS offers a focal point within London for the Sudanese people,
many of whom are bewildered by being there and need regular help and
support, especially to ensure their children take best advantage from
their day schools all over the city.

In the late afternoon when the last parents have collected their
children, Dr El Dawi takes down the SSS sign. He is tired but happy.
Reflecting on the past ten years as the school has grown from
strength to strength with a non arrogant pride Dr El Dawi emphasises
that he is not looking for publicity. “It is an honour to serve the
community. We are liasing with many local and national organisations
to promote a sense of belonging for the children and the community at
large”.

www.sudaneseschool.com

Armenian minister denies Turkey to mediate Karabakh talks

Armenian minister denies Turkey to mediate Karabakh talks

Mediamax news agency
30 Jun 04

YEREVAN

Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan today denied Turkish media
reports that increasing Turkey’s role in the Karabakh conflict
settlement had been discussed at the trilateral meeting of the
Turkish, Armenian and Azerbaijani foreign ministers in Istanbul [on 28
June].

Addressing a briefing in Yerevan today, Vardan Oskanyan said that the
Nagornyy Karabakh problem had been discussed at the meeting of the
Turkish, Armenian and Azerbaijani foreign ministers only in general.

“We have repeatedly stated that Turkey, which has taken an openly
biased position in the Nagornyy Karabakh settlement, cannot pretend
playing the role of an impartial mediator. The Turkish authorities are
well aware of our position,” Vardan Oskanyan said.

Armenian Paper Complains of Poor Reception at Istanbul NATO Summit

ARMENIAN PAPER COMPLAINS OF POOR RECEPTION AT ISTANBUL-HOSTED NATO SUMMIT

Aykakan Zhamanak, Yerevan
29 Jun 04

An Armenian delegation headed by Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan
arrived in Istanbul yesterday (28 June) to attend the NATO summit.

The most noteworthy among Oskanyan’s meetings in Istanbul yesterday
was his bilateral meeting with Turkey’s Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul
and later a trilateral meeting with Gul and Azerbaijan’s Foreign
Minister (Elmar) Mammadyarov.

But before touching on these meetings, let us present some not so
pleasant facts: the members of the Armenian delegation were very much
displeased when at Istanbul’s Kemal Ataturk airport nobody came up to
the landed Armenian plane for about 15 minutes. The Oskanyan-Gul
meeting was postponed at Turkey’s request and took place several hours
earlier than scheduled. For this reason, Armenian journalists did not
have an opportunity to cover it, as they were moving from one
checkpoint to another in central Istanbul and could not enter the
venue of the NATO summit. And finally, the Armenian delegation was
very displeased when before his trilateral meeting with Gul and
Mammadyarov, Vardan Oskanyan had to wait for a while in the hall of
Hotel Hyatt to be invited to the meeting.

By the way, in the same hotel, at the same time meetings of different
delegations were taking place, but we did not meet any minister who
had to sit and wait. This kind of treatment of the Armenian delegation
made senior members of the Armenian delegation angry as well. In
particular, one of them said that the Turkish leadership had focused
its entire attention on the arrival of a 1,200-strong delegation from
the USA, and to justify the attitude towards Armenia, he added that
some countries had not even received a flag to stick at their
delegations’ cars.

Anyway, one of the major issues on the agenda of the Oskanyan-Gul
meeting was the opening of the Armenian-Turkish border. Commenting on
this meeting, Oskanyan said that in his view, Turkey has a great
desire to open the Armenian-Turkish border but the right political
time has not yet come. As for the Oskanyan-Gul-Mammadyarov trilateral
meeting, it was the fourth one held in this format, but the first one
with the participation of Mammadyarov. The ministers declined to
answer journalists’ questions after the meeting. Here are Vardan
Oskanyan’s answers to some of our questions:

(Aykakan Zhamanak correspondent) Mr Oskanyan, you have said more than
once that if during these meetings Turkey takes on the role of a
mediator, you will reject that. Today Turkey was the initiator of this
meeting. Was it really just the initiator?

(Vardan Oskanyan) There was absolutely no allusion to mediation, the
three countries were talking with one another on equal terms since
they have interests in the South Caucasus. I think it was really a
useful discussion because of its format.

(Correspondent) Did you talk during the meeting about returning seven
districts to Azerbaijan and opening the Armenian-Azerbaijani railway,
as the Azerbaijani and Turkish press reported earlier?

(Oskanyan) No, we did not. We talked about Nagornyy Karabakh, but we
did not go into details. We simply touched on the Prague meeting, and
the Azerbaijani foreign minister and I expressed certain views
concerning the issue.

(Correspondent) In Armenia some people are very much inspired by
(Armenian President) Robert Kocharyan’s speech at PACE (Parliamentary
Assembly of the Council of Europe). At your meetings here did you feel
the influence of this speech in a positive sense?

(Oskanyan) You know, since we did not go into details of the Karabakh
issue today, I noticed no influence.

(Passage omitted: security measures in place in Istanbul)