Azerbaijan’s War-Mongering Rhetoric Intended For Domestic Audience –

AZERBAIJAN’S WAR-MONGERING RHETORIC INTENDED FOR DOMESTIC AUDIENCE – EXPERT

news.am
June 27 2011
Armenia

YEREVAN. – Following Armenian, Azerbaijani and Russian presidents’
meeting in Kazan, likelihood of resumption of military hostilities
in Karabakh has not increase, Stepan Grigoryan, Head of the Center
for Globalization and Regional Cooperation, told a press conference
on Monday.

He stressed the intensification of Azerbaijan’s war-mongering
rhetoric is logical, as Baku’s expectations about the meeting were
not fulfilled.

“However, Baku will not dare to put its military threats into effect,
realizing the likelihood of a tough response of the international
community to the military action,” the expert emphasized.

According to him, Azerbaijan’s military rhetoric are intended for
domestic audience on the eve of elections, as Aliyev realizes Karabakh
dispute will complicate his chances in the upcoming elections.

There Is A Chance To Restore The Armenian-Syrian Relations On 1990s,

THERE IS A CHANCE TO RESTORE THE ARMENIAN-SYRIAN RELATIONS ON 1990S
Anna Nazaryan

“Radiolur”
28.06.2011

“The strained Turkish-Syrian relations are dangerous today. They pose
a serious problem to Turkish authorities, but Armenia should also
make certain judgments,” expert of Turkish studies Artak Shakaryan
told a press conference today.

Expert of Arab studies Araik Harutyunyan says that under the conditions
of strained Turkish-Syrian relations, Armenia must try to deepen its
ties with Syria.

“The “Arab spring” did not bypass Syria, and the migration of about
10 thousand Syrians has brought about tension in the Turkish-Syrian
relations, since most people crossing the Turkish border represent
anti-Turkish elements,” Arayik Harutyunyan said. According to him,
“Turkey has problems with neighbors, but the internal political issues
are the most important.”

When the Turkish-Syrian relations improved back in 2000, this affected
the Armenian-Syrian ties. Now Armenia has a chance to restore the
Armenian-Syrian relations of 1990, Harutyunyan said.

Artak Shakaryan says Turkey is trying to use the situation to create
a buffer zone in Syria. According to him, our western neighbor aspires
to assume the role of the chief mediator.

“If there is no external pressure on Turkey, the latter will push back
the discussion of the Armenian-Turkish protocols, leaving them for
2014, on the eve of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide,”
Shakaryan said.

SOAD May Headline Armenia’s Independence 20th Anniversary Concert

SOAD MAY HEADLINE ARMENIA’S INDEPENDENCE 20TH ANNIVERSARY CONCERT

PanARMENIAN.Net
June 27, 2011 – 14:23 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenia may soon host the concert of System of
a Down famous rock band. In June 20 Youtube video, SOAD bass Shavo
Odadjian told a fan that the band is glad to be visiting Moscow and
plans a visit to Armenia in near future.As reliable sources told a
PanARMENIAN.Net reporter, the SOAD concert might be featured in the
framework of Armenia’s Independence 20th anniversary.

Serj Tankian’s last year concert organizer, Deem Communications
director Raffi Niziblian, refused to comment on the information.

However, he did not rule out for Deem Communications to take charge
of the organization of the next concert.

SOAD tour over Europe launched on June 2.

Stepan Grigoryan Told: Kazan Meeting Reaffirms That The Karabakh Con

STEPAN GRIGORYAN TOLD: KAZAN MEETING REAFFIRMS THAT THE KARABAKH CONFLICT SHOULD BE SOLVED THROUGH NEGOTIATIONS
Siranush Muradyan

“Radiolur”
27.06.2011 14:53

“The meeting in Kazan reaffirmed that the Karabakh conflict should
be solved through negotiations, not war,” Head of the Center for
Globalization and Regional Cooperation Stepan Grigoryan told a press
conference today.

The military rhetoric of Azerbaijan after the Kazan meeting is meant
for internal audience, the political scientist added.

“Presidential elections are expected in Azerbaijan, and the
President of the country is thus trying to save his own rating,”
Stepan Grigoryan stated.

La Delinquance Juvenile A Tendance A Diminuer

LA DELINQUANCE JUVENILE A TENDANCE A DIMINUER
Stephane

armenews.com
lundi 27 juin 2011

La delinquance juvenile a diminue en Armenie au cours des cinq
derniers mois a declare le Chef du Departement des mineurs de la
police, le colonel Nelly Duryan ors d’une conference de presse.

Selon elle, le nombre de crimes commis par les mineurs a diminue de
32 affaires par rapport a la meme periode de 2010.Le nombre a chute
de 201 affaires en 2010 a 169 cette annee.

A l’inverse les cas d’usage de drogues par les mineurs ont augmente.

March 1 2008 Incidents In Serzh Sargsyan’s Hands A Measure To Restra

MARCH 1 2008 INCIDENTS IN SERZH SARGSYAN’S HANDS A MEASURE TO RESTRAIN ROBERT KOCHARYAN’S AMBITIONS
by Ashot Safaryan

arminfo
Monday, June 27, 11:37

Interview with Karapet Rubinyan, former vice speaker of the Armenian
National Assembly, ex-member of the oppositional Armenian National
Congress

Mr. Rubinyan, what do you think of the domestic political situation in
Armenia in the light of ANC-authorities dialogue? Is there an agenda
of those negotiations?

The ANC’s behavior seems quite strange to me, taking into account
the uncertainty of relations between the Congress and the authorities.

Moreover, the ANC does not want at all to inform thepublic of its
intentions about the talks with the authorities. On the other hand,
the positive result of these talks is the release of political
prisoners, which should be considered as the authorities’ step to
reduce the tension.

Consequently, at the moment there is no such tension that would allow
thinking about a fight against the regime, and there are all premises
for regular parliamentary election.

Is there any use of fighting the regime now when the authorities have
fulfilled all the basic demands of the opposition hereby significantly
easing the situation?

I think, the nature of the ruling regime in Armenia has undergone no
essential changes despite the fact that the political prisoners have
been released and the Liberty Square has been returned to people for
rallies. The authorities have only removed the consequences of their
actions, but the primary reasons have remained: the rigged results of
the elections, monopolies in the economy, fusion of business and power,
and as a result, the socio-economic state of the citizens, which is
getting worse and worse with every passing day. If the current state
of affairs continues, social shocks will be inevitable in the future
despite the certain reduction of tension. I cannot forecast whether the
Congress will agree to aggravation of the situation by revising its
loyal policy towards the authorities or it will be replaced by other
forces capable to conduct the people’s protest in the needed course.

The Congress has repeatedly declared that a “velvet revolution”
started in Armenia. It is not likely that ANC is going to stay aside
of possible tension…

I do not understand the ANC’s position, according to which one can gain
a change of power without any shocks, while the ANC representatives
describe a quite fantastic scenario: after all the concessions demanded
by the Congress, Serzh Sargsyan will allegedly sit at the negotiation
table and send in his resignation. This is ridiculous. Serzh Sargsyan
may leave power under compulsion only.

This compulsion may be either in the non-constitutional way by a
group of people, which is absolutely unacceptable, or by means of a
nationwide protest. As regards the course chosen by the Congress, it
may not only fail to lead to the second scenario, but also push off
many supporters. Over the past three years the ANC has not managed
to correctly organize its activity or direct the protesting mood of
the citizens to the needed course.

You have mentioned establishment of new political forces.

Establishment of Free Democrats Party resulted in a boom among
political experts and Mass Media. Do you bear any relation to creation
of that party given the fact that its initiators are your former
colleagues from APNM?

I bear relation to the given party, at least, because many of my
friends joined it after they left the Armenian Pan-National Movement.

Did that party split the APNM and, in fact, the Congress?

Withdrawal of the creators of this party from the APNM has become a
result of the processes that occurred in summer 2010, when despite
the APNM principles – liberalism and democracy, several members of
the APNM were excluded from the Board of APNM, including the deputy
chairman of Board Khachatur Kokobelyan. At the same time, no clear
explanation followed this process. The only thing this was motivated
by was the alleged cooperation of Kokobelyan with the authorities.

But in this case, it could be quite possible to announce this openly
and ground such accusations instead of playing behind the scenes. In
fact, I think that Levon Ter-Petrosyan has decided to completely
take APNM under his control, and he simply did not trust the group
of people excluded from the Board of APNM.

The former members of APNM have a great experience in politics,
most of them held high posts in the structure of the party. To all
appearances, they have no desire to leave politics today, and

they have no other way to remain in politics but forming a new party,
and there is nothing extraordinary. As regards the talks that this is
allegedly the project of the authorities trying to split the Congress,
I think that one should not make immediate conclusions, let’s live
and see.

How consistent the country’s leadership will be in investigating the
tragic developments of March 2008 in Yerevan, considering that Serzh
Sargsyan touched upon that issue also in his speech at PACE?

The matter should concern not the investigation, as everything was
investigated and detected long ago, but bringing the officials to
responsibility. I think, one of the officials is Serzh Sargsyan,
who assured that the March 1 case will be revised. I am skeptical
about the prospect of bringing all the culprits of the tragedy to
responsibility, as I do not think that Serzh Sargsyan will punish
himself. The fate of the rest of the March massacre initiators depends
on the political environment.

He thinks that Sargsyan’s statement is formal and it aims to restrain
the ambitions of Robert Kocharyan, who is thoroughly looking for a
place in the sun, rather than to implement the demands of the Armenian
National Congress. As regards Kocharyan’s attempts to become active
in the politics, they are more than obvious, taking into account his
meetings with the presidents or premiers of some countries, as well
as his attacks on the mass media, etc.

What did the dialogue with the Congress give to the authorities?

During the recent rally of ANC stressed the necessity of listening
to “the equal party” to the negotiations. How can the people that
have usurped the power be equal partners? This means that Sargsyan
has significantly strengthened his positions. This deal brought
nothing to the people. As for the Congress, it has got nothing except
disappointment of the people. The only way out of the situation for ANC
is to announce at the June 30 rally that the Congress has no topic of
a dialogue with the authorities and will continue the fight as before.

What parties are you going to cooperate with after withdrawal from
the ANC? You have earlier expressed your support to Raffi Hovannisian,
Leader of the Heritage Party…

Unfortunately, there is no culture of inter-party cooperation in
Armenia. Nevertheless, there are certain chances for cooperation with
separate representatives of some political forces. I think parties
can promote civil initiatives to demand and achieve domination of
the law in the country, restoration of the legal bases of relations
between the authorities and public. A large front of civil fight is
necessary to settle this task.

Turkish Courts Refuse To Release Six Jailed Politicians Elected As M

TURKISH COURTS REFUSE TO RELEASE SIX JAILED POLITICIANS ELECTED AS MPS

PanARMENIAN.Net
June 27, 2011 – 12:15 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Courts in Diyarbakýr, Turkey, have refused to release
six jailed politicians elected as deputies in the June 12 elections,
barring them from taking their seats in parliament.

All six politicians are backed by the pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy
Party (BDP) but they ran in the elections as independent candidates
out of fears that the BDP would be unable to pass Turkey’s 10-percent
election threshold for representation in Parliament.

The politicians, Ýbrahim Ayhan, Gursel Yýldýrým, Selma Irmak, Kemal
Aktaþ, Faysal Sarýyýldýz and Hatip Dicle, are suspects in a court
case into the Kurdish Communities Union (KCK), an outlawed group
believed to be linked to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). They
are accused of being part of the outlawed KCK organization and the
court is demanding up to 15 years imprisonment.

The Kurdish block, which won 36 seats, plans to boycott Parliament,
which convenes for oath-taking on June 28, unless all the jailed
deputies are given the right to join parliament, Today’s Zaman
reported.

Preliminary Investigation Ended up in `Suicide’

Preliminary Investigation Ended up in `Suicide’

Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 17:49:13 – 24/06/2011

The detective of the Defense Ministry’s investigative service Levon
Petrosyan announced yesterday that the preliminary investigation of
the case of Artak Nazaryan who died in the military unit of Mehrabner,
Tavush Region, and the case will be sent to court. The preliminary
investigation concluded that Artak was induced to a suicide.

The investigation lasted for over 11 months, the records are in 9
volumes. Attorneys Seda Safaryan and Mushegh Shushanyan who have been
notified on the end of the preliminary investigation have asked for
time to be exposed to the materials of the case after which they will
file necessary petitions.

The court which will judge the case is not known yet but it is clear
that the trial of this case will produce strong resonance among local
and international human rights organizations. Artak Nazaryan’s family
disagrees with the investigative body’s conclusion on suicide, they
are sure that their son was killed.

The lawyers engaged in the preliminary proceedings lasting for 11
months have regularly reported breaches and shortcomings but were
unable to influence the course of the proceedings.

The preliminary investigative body refused to provide the `suicide
note’ and diary for an alternative graphology test, thereby limiting
the rights of the injured party and their representatives, though we
witnessed the ease with which the same note was put to public debate.

The only change to the criminal case was instigated by the military
prosecutor Gevorg Kostanyan, he increased the number of accused from 4
to 5, which, however, did not affect the essence of the case. On April
6 the preliminary investigative body engaged Lieutenant Vahagn
Hairapetyan as accused to the case. In the presence of the base
personnel he used violence on Artak Nazaryan, hit him in his face and
different parts of the body chaotically, causing grave consequences.

Captain Hakob Manukyan and 3 private soldiers have been arrested. They
are suspects in the proceedings launched under Art.110 Para1. The
captain is suspected of committing the crime provided by Art.375 Para2
of the Criminal Code. The privates are suspected of committing the
crime provided by Art.358 Para3 of the Criminal Code.

Janna Alexanyan

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/society22369.html

ANKARA: Turkey, Israel And Armenia

TURKEY, ISRAEL AND ARMENIA

Today’s Zaman

June 24 2011
Turkey

The recent electoral victory of the Justice and Development Party
(AK Party), which has held on to power thanks to the support of half
of Turkey’s population, may motivate several countries to clarify
their policy towards Turkey.

There is, however, some bad news for people in Europe who oppose
Turkey’s accession to the EU on the grounds of their opposition to
Turkey’s Muslim majority: While they will probably not have to deal
with Turkey inside the EU for many years to come, they will nonetheless
have to work together with Turkey in the European Council, NATO and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the near future with increasing
frequency. So, maybe it is time for them to decide about Turkey.

We have to admit that the election outcome augurs a difficult period
for those who were hoping to get rid of the AK Party and to see Turkey
governed by a neocon-like approach. Regardless of the debate about
whether or not the AK Party is functioning in a fully democratic
manner, this party is the political actor that democratized Turkey.

Those in bordering countries, from Armenia to Syria, who want democracy
in their countries are encouraged by the AK Party’s victory; in
return, this party has become a disturbing actor in the eyes of many
governments in the Caucasus and in the Middle-East.

Turkey is not capable of dictating every outcome in the region by
itself. However, it is capable of pressuring Syria to implement
reforms, and if Turkey manages to do that, it may do the same in
Azerbaijan, Armenia and Israel in a more credible manner. These
countries can tell Turkey to start by cleaning its own house first,
but the Turkish people have just demonstrated their will and readiness
to tidy up their country. The Turkish government is also aware that
Turkey will be more efficient in the surrounding region once Turkey’s
domestic problems are resolved.

It appears that Armenia and Israel have understood the Turkish voters’
message and that they follow Turkey’s domestic political developments
very closely. They probably predict that a party which has won
three consecutive elections and which benefits from the support of
50 percent of the people will feel free to take more audacious steps
in foreign policy.

Recent press reports indicate that these two countries have already
begun to test their predictions. The Israeli government relentlessly
announces that it wants to normalize its relations with Turkey, and
the latter has confirmed that negotiations have been taking place for
some time with Israeli officials. As for Armenia, it has expressed its
will to initiate talks with Turkey “without conditions.” These press
reports also intend to test the reaction of the Turkish public to these
developments, but what is more important is that they prove that these
two countries are trying to normalize their relations with Turkey.

The normalization of Turkey’s relations with Israel and Armenia will
make it difficult for the EU to reach a decision about Turkey, because
it’s easier to say no when our relations are on bad terms with our
neighbors. Nevertheless, the EU’s decision about Turkey is of crucial
importance for the restructuration of the Middle East and the Caucasus.

The fate of Palestine is not so disconnected from the fate of
Nagorno-Karabakh. Everybody knows that the developments in Palestine
have an effect on Iran, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon, but one mustn’t
minimize its effects on Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan, or on
Nagorno-Karabakh, Ossetia and Abkhazia. Moreover, the developments
in all these regions have an influence on maintaining the balance
between Russia, the US and the EU. The Armenia-Turkey-Israel line has
a decisive importance as the tone of their relations with each other
will facilitate a way for others in the region to find their place in
this balance. In brief, the existing conditions require rapprochement
between these three countries.

http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist-248443-turkey-israel-and-armenia.html

Armenian Opposition Highlights President’s Two Blunders On Karabakh

ARMENIAN OPPOSITION HIGHLIGHTS PRESIDENT’S TWO BLUNDERS ON KARABAKH

news.am
June 24 2011
Armenia

YEREVAN. – The authorities deliberately differentiate between the
notions of dialogue and negotiations. They are trying to maneuver,
said the coordinator of opposition Armenian National Congress (ANC)
Levon Zurabyan.

He noted that the notion of negotiations implies definite results
achieved through definite agreements, while the authorities try
to avoid negotiations and stick to remote dialogue, an exchange
of opinions.

“We don’t have time for gossiping,” said Zurabyan, adding that ANC
can choose more interesting interlocutor for gossip.

He also emphasized that sole means for productive dialogue is
negotiation through authorized representatives.

Touching upon Serzh Sargsyan’s PACE statement that there is no
need for early Parliament elections in Armenia, Zurabyan said that
“tomorrow he might change his opinion.”

As for Serzh Sargsyan’s other statements at PACE speech, the opposition
activist highlighted two major errors.

“Firstly, the president said that Armenia does not recognize NKR’s
sovereignty because it respects territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. I
hope this statement just slipped of his tongue and it will be remedied
as soon as possible.”

According to ANC coordinator, Sargsyan’s statement that in case of new
war, Azerbaijan will have privilege because Armenia did not prepare
its people to war, is Sargsyan’s second blunder.

“Why are the people unprepared if there is a possibility of war? It
does not fit the chief commander to make such statements,” said
Zurabyan.