IRANBUL: Turkey may become an oil, gas mediator – former Armenian PM

Turkey may become an oil, gas medidator, says former Armenian PM
GOKHAN KURTARAN
ISTANBUL – Hurriyet Daily News
Sunday, May 29, 2011

Turkey could play a significant role in mediating between energy
dependent Europe and oil- and gas-rich Russia and Iran, said Aram
Sarkisian, a former Armenian prime minister and energy professional
today.

`Without Russia and Iran, Caspian oil and gas could not be transferred
to Europe,’ Sarkisian told the Hurriyet Daily News over the weekend.

`The pipeline projects to bring the vast resources of the Caspian
region to Europe through Turkey are still in question,’ said
Sarkisian, who is currently the president of Euroasia House, a
London-based institution involved in research and policy development
on Russian oil and gas. `Conditions have changed rapidly in the
Caspian region including Turkey after the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan crude
oil pipeline was stretched from Azerbaijan to Turkey,’ he said, noting
that delays in the implementation of alternative pipelines to Europe
might end up with irrecoverable losses.

He was speaking on the sidelines of `Global Energy Outlook’ conference
organized by the Istanbul International Energy and Climate Center at
Sabanci University.

Urge for Nabucco

`Turkey is the only country that could bring Iran and Russia together
again to open negotiations for energy security in the region,’ he
said. “Russia has always been seen as a mistrusted neighbor, due to
historical constraints. Armenia’s confidence in Russia may be
established by Turkey as it became one of the Russia’s strongest
energy partners.”

According to him, as the energy demand rises in Europe, the long-term
discussions over the details of the route of the Nabucco plan, the gas
bridge project from Asia to Europe, should come to an end.

The pipeline to connect the world’s richest gas regions – the Caspian
region, Middle East and Egypt – to the European consumer markets,
might `change its route to China due to rising demand in Chinese
market,’ he said. `I think the European Union has no energy policy,’
he said. `The vast sources of Caspian oil and gas might go to the
Chinese market eventually if Europe keeps on waiting, delaying the
projects.’

Emphasizing Turkey’s close ties with Russia, the former Armenian prime
minister said the trust harmed by the disagreement resulted in supply
disruptions in many European nations, with complete cutoffs of their
gas supplies transported through Ukraine from Russia in 2009 `could be
restored by Turkey.’ In order to have sustainable energy security in
the region, `we all have to trust in each other in the region,’
Sarkisian told the Daily News.

Arctic resources

Moreover, Sarkisian suggested Turkey and India partner with each other
on the vast Arctic resources. `Turkey and India, as emerging
economies, should have a say on the Arctic oil and gas resources,’
said Sarkisian.

Total Arctic resources are estimated to be nearly 90 billion barrels
of oil, 1.67 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and 44 billion
barrels of natural gas liquids, according to the U.S. Geological
Survey.

Emphasizing the importance of the vast oil and gas resources in Iran,
Sarkisian said, `Being a European country both economically and
culturally, Turkey can mediate between Iran and the European Union to
make use of the vast resources there.’ Without the approval of Iran,
Caspian resources could never be fully developed, according to
Sarkisian. `Everyone waits for the change in the Iran, but the change
will come once the EU starts opening its doors to relations with
Iran.’

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=turkey-may-become-an-oil-an-gas-medidator-says-former-armenian-pm-2011-05-29

Not a good time to change OSCE MG format, ICG expert says

Not a good time to change OSCE MG format, ICG expert says

May 29, 2011 – 16:43 AMT
PanARMENIAN.Net –

It is not a good time to change OSCE Minsk Group format having an EU
representative instead of a French co-chair, because the co-chairs
feel that they are very close to signing the basic principles,
International Crisis Group (ICG) Europe Program Director Sabine
Freizer believes.

If an agreement on “basic principles” is not reached in the coming
months, the international community will have to seriously think about
efficiency of negotiating format and the chosen strategy, she noted.
In this context the EU will have a chance to prove itself.

On Wednesday the EU published a report – revised European Neighborhood
Policy (ENP), which is under consideration of the European Parliament
and other EU authorities.

The report says that the European Union is ready to enhance EU
involvement in solving protracted conflicts. The EU must be ready to
step up its involvement in formats where it is not yet represented,
such as the OSCE Minsk Group on Karabakh conflict, the report reads.

Experts suppose that this may imply the EU involvement in the Minsk
Group as a co-chair, perhaps, by replacing the French co-chair.

“There has been a discussion within the European Union about weather
or not it would useful to have an EU representative instead of French
co-chair,” Freizer said. “But, of course, for that to happen would
require also the approval by Azerbaijan and Armenia, and other two
co-chairs,” Trend news quoted her as saying.

President Sargsyan visits Sardarapat Memorial

President Sargsyan visits Sardarapat Memorial

ARMRADIO.AM
28.05.2011 15:19

President Serzh Sargsyan visited the Sardarapat Memorial today to
participate in the festive events dedicated to the Republic Day.

President Sargsyan laid a wreath at the memorial to the heroes of the
Sardarapat Battle and participated in the festivities and concert
organized on the occasion of the Republic Day.

BAKU: Regular Cossack troops have never fought in Nagorno-Karabakh

Trend, Azerbaijan
May 27 2011

Chieftain of Association of Azerbaijani Cossacks: Regular Cossack
troops have never fought in Nagorno-Karabakh

Azerbaijan, Baku, May 27 /Trend, S.Agayeva/

Regular Cossack troops have never fought in Nagorno-Karabakh, said the
chieftain of Association of Azerbaijani Cossacks Victor Mereshkin.

“No representative of the regular Cossack troops has fought in
Nagorno-Karabakh,” Mereshkin told Trend, commenting on the Armenian
media reports that a monument will be established to the Kuban
Cossacks, who died in battle, in the occupied territories of Nagorno
Karabakh.

Mereshkin said the Armenians have established six monuments to the
Cossacks in Armenia at different times, but no representative of the
regular Cossack troops participated in their opening. “All of these
are an Armenian lie,” said Mereshkin.
Mereshkin said a so-called “Armenian-Russian Cossack Association”, led
by Mais Mirzoyan functions in Armenia, but no member of this structure
has Slavic surnames. “What are these Cossacks?” said the chieftain.

The chieftain of the Kuban Cossack troops Vladimir Gromov already in
1993, appealing to the leadership of Azerbaijan, officially announced
that the Cossacks were not fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh, said
Mereshkin.
“At one time, Armenians have written that in Sochi will be a monument
to Andronicus, and when I called on this issue to local chieftain,
they replied that they have their enough heroes, and they are not
going to establish a monument to an Armenian,” said Mereshkin.

“All the Cossack troops of Russia and Ukraine unequivocally support
Azerbaijan,” said Mereshkin.

Association of Azerbaijani Cossacks was registered by the Ministry of
Justice on Nov. 16, 1994. It combines about 1,500 people, whose
ancestors were Cossacks roots, and those who accept the charter and
tradition of the Cossacks.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 surrounding districts.
Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. – are
currently holding the peace negotiations.
Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh region and the
occupied territories.

Croatia urged to accept blame for WWII genocide against Serbs, Jews,

SRNA news agency, Bosnian Serb News Agency
May 25 2011

Croatia urged to accept blame for WWII genocide against Serbs, Jews, Roma

Banja Luka, 25 May: Croatia must accept historical responsibility for
the genocide committed against Serbs, Jews and Roma by the Independent
State of Croatia (NDH) in WWII, says a declaration passed today in
Banja Luka at the 5th International Conference on Jasenovac.

The declaration demands that a day be set in Croatia, B-H
[Bosnia-Hercegovina], [B-H entity] Republika Srpska [Serb Republic]
and Serbia to remember the victims of genocide in the Independent
State of Croatia and that the present Croatian authorities determine
and pay within a reasonable time frame compensation to the victims and
their descendents.

The participants asked that the Jasenovac complex of concentration
camps be preserved as a whole, and that the Donja Gradina Memorial
Area be protected further to the relevant project of the 1980s.

The 5th International Conference on Jasenovac concluded that the
crimes committed by the [pro-Nazi] Croatian Ustashas against Serbs,
Jews and Roma in WWII in the Independent State of Croatia were
planned, as genocide is defined in the UN Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948.

“700,000 Serbs, 23,000 Jews and 80,000 Roma were tortured, looted,
raped and killed in the Jasenovac system of concentration camps only,”
says the declaration.

The declaration says that the NDH was the only state in WWII which had
concentration camps for the extermination of children, and according
to an incomplete investigation, 42,791 Serbian children, 5,737 Roma
children and 3,710 Jewish children were killed in Stara Gradiska,
Jasenovac, Ustica, Jablanac, Gornja Rijeka near Krizevac and Lobograd.

They stressed that in its scope, the genocide in the NDH was the
closest to the holocaust committed by the Nazi Germany against Jews.

Srboljub Zivanovic of the International Commission to Determine the
Truth about Jasenovac, said the declaration will be sent to the
parliaments of all countries, but first to the countries of the former
Yugoslavia.

“We don’t know if the parliaments of these countries will pass it
immediately, but if we take as an example a similar declaration
brought by the Armenians on genocide committed against them in 1915,
which was accepted by some only last year, then I believe we will not
have to wait so long,” Zivanovic said.

He added that the declaration is aimed at drawing the attention of not
only the parliaments of all countries but of the whole world to the
horrible and planned crime committed by the Independent State of
Croatia in these parts, which state declared Serbs, Jews and Gypsies
outside the law.

“Even though many countries had information of these crimes, they kept
silent, primarily because the former Yugoslavia did not speak of them.
By bringing this declaration, we are siding with the small number of
countries which raised their voices against the crime committed,”
Zivanovic said.

According to surviving Jasenovac inmate Dobrila Kukolj, the issue of
compensation for surviving inmates and families of victims is raised
today for the first time, which issue should be resolved by Croatia,
which has never admitted the crime that was committed.

“The Republic of Croatia does not admit to being the successor to the
NDH. We complained to the UN to review the issue of the people who
survived those horrors, even though money can not compensate them,”
she said.

She thanked RS President Milorad Dodik for his support for a film on
the truth about Jasenovac that should be made.

The participants of the Conference today will pay a visit to the Donja
Gradina Memorial Area and Jasenovac.

Journalism Behind Bars

The Nation (Thailand)
May 28, 2011 Saturday

Journalism Behind Bars

In a study released in early April, the Organisation for Security and
Cooperation in Europe’s representative on freedom of the media, Dunja
Mijatovic, reported that 57 journalists are currently in prison in
Turkey, mostly on the basis of the country’s ant

Such a situation is intolerable anywhere, but particularly in a
democracy that seeks European Union membership, and that recognises
freedom of expression as a fundamental right. Turkey’s behaviour thus
calls into question not only its desire but also its ability to commit
to the values underlying the EU.

Journalists linked to Kurdish or Marxist organisations have regularly
been targeted under Turkey’s anti-terrorism laws, and the OSCE study
found that they have faced some of the harshest punishments. One
Kurdish journalist was sentenced to 166 years in prison. Others
currently face ` wait for it ` 3,000-year sentences if convicted.

The relative lack of scrutiny of Turkey’s treatment of journalists by
many in the West has changed, however, owing to the recent waves of
arrests in the so-called “Ergenekon” case. Numerous military officers
and academics have been implicated in that case, which involves an
alleged plot by secular ultra-nationalists to overthrow the Turkish
government. The probe has now turned increasingly toward journalists.

One of those accused of participating in the plot is the daily
newspaper Milliyet’s investigative reporter Nedim Sener, whose work
includes a book about links between security forces and the 2007
murder of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink. The International
Press Institute (IPI) named Sener a World Press Freedom Hero in 2010.
Incarcerated following his arrest last month, he reportedly stands
accused of belonging to an armed terrorist organisation seeking to
overthrow the government.

Another journalist under fire is Ahmet Sik, who already faced
prosecution for co-writing a book criticising the government’s
crackdown on the Ergenekon plot. Sik was said to be working on a book
about the alleged influence of an Islamic group within Turkey’s police
force, which authorities last month ordered confiscat ed before it
could be printed.

A common thread in all of the cases targeting journalists is that the
alleged facts are shrouded in secrecy, and the authorities have
declined to release any evidence of crimes or criminal organisations.
Worse still, they have declined even to inform those brought before
courts ` sometimes in secret ` or their attorneys of the charges
they face. Indeed, journalists caught in this Kafkaesque affair can
expect to spend years behind bars before being allowed to respond to
the accusations against them. A climate of fear escalates with each
raid and arrest.

Meanwhile, Turkish authorities affirm the country’s commitment to
press freedom, even as they impugn the motives of those who exercise
it. Given that so many journalists have been jailed, and that all of
them have been critical of the government, it is difficult to avoid
the conclusion that journalists are being targeted because of their
work.

Such concern has been voiced not only by press-freedom groups such as
IPI, and journalists, like the Freedom for Journalists Platform (an
umbrella group representing local and national media organisations in
Turkey), but also by respected international institutions. The United
States’ Mission to the OSCE and the European Commission have joined
Mijatovic in calling on Turkey’s authorities to stop their
intimidation of the media immediately, and to uphold basic OSCE media
freedom commitments. The United Nations Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights has called on Turkey to guarantee
freedom of opinion and expression. Even Turkey’s president, Abdullah
Gul, recently called for “prosecutors and courts to be more diligent
in pursuing their responsibilities, and to act in a way that does not
harm the honour and rights of the people”.

Turkey plays a pivotal, bridge-building role between East and West,
and the country has been praised for demonstrating that democracy can
co-exist with Islam. But the arrests of so many journalists are
eroding this image.

The right of journalists to cover sensitive topics, including national
security, is fundamental. Those who do not engage in criminal activity
should not face arrest, imprisonment, or any other form of harassment
or intimidation for doing their job. Those accused of criminal
activity must be given due process and a fair trial. Evidence must be
provided, and the accused must be presented with the charges they face
and the opportunity to defend themselves.

Far from being defamatory subversives, journalists who investigate and
criticise their government’s actions demonstrate true patriotism,
because no democracy can survive without the open and independent
assessment of public policies that journalists provide. If Turkey, a
major regional power with an ancient cultural heritage, truly wishes
to be welcomed into Europe, to take its rightful place on the world
stage, and, indeed, to remain a democracy, its leaders must not hold
freedom of the press in contempt.

Alison Bethel-McKenzie is director of the International Press
Institute. Steven M Ellis is IPI press freedom adviser.

Project Syndicate.

4 Cow’s Hooves & Ankles (de-haired & Cleaned)… Armenian Khash

The Times (London)
May 28, 2011 Saturday
Edition 1; National Edition

4 COW’S HOOVES AND ANKLES (de-haired and cleaned) 1 COW’S BRAIN
(optional) BOIL FOR 32 HOURS (without seasoning) REMOVE SCUM (put
bones on plate to gnaw)

‘First I think I’ve burnt my tongue… then I gag.’ Alex Renton
experiences haute cuisine, Armenia-style Is this the worst dish in the
world?

by Alex Renton

Khash, “the masterpiece of Armenian cuisine”, is always eaten early in
the morning. “It is not wise to eat it late,” says our host, Shirak.
“Khash is so rich, you need all day to digest it.” He takes us to
visit the kitchen the night before the feast; we inspect the great pot
where four cow’s feet and ankles and one bovine brain are bubbling.
“It started cooking last night, because khash must be stewed for 32
hours,” says Shirak. We agree to meet when that time is up: at 7am.

; I wake with a sense of dread. I dreamt I was back at school, faced
with an important exam: Shirak was the invigilator. When I get
downstairs, I think how much I would give for a cup of tea and no
breakfast-time challenges. But on the table is a pile of crispy lavash
flatbread, some radishes, a bowl of crushed garlic and salt. And a
bottle of vodka.

; The khash arrives: a steaming bowl of murky beige and pink shreds,
with yellow fat already beginning to coagulate around its edges.
Shirak pours us all a glass of vodka. Then he breaks up the flatbread
and stuffs the shards into the bowl, stirring it. Then a big spoonful
of the raw garlic and another of salt. We are ready. All eyes are
watching me.

; At first I think I’ve burnt my tongue because I can taste nothing.
Then I realise that actually it does taste of nothing, in a sort of
oily way, except when you get a hit of garlic. Then I gag. “I think
you need more salt,” says Shirak kindly. That helps, but the vodka
helps more. By bracketing soup sips with vodka gulps I quite quickly
get half the bowl down. Everyone looks pleased.

; Shirak tells the story of khash. “Once, a great Armenian king saw
that the children of his servants were very healthy. More healthy than
his own children. He asked why, and found that when the cow was
slaughtered, and the rich people took the meat, the poor were taking
what was left – the feet – and making soup. So he ordered that from
now on the feet would be served to him as khash. And so it is now a
soup for the rich. In restaurants it costs 2,500 drams (£4) a
serving.”

; Fat is now congealing around my mouth as though I’ve put on too much
lip balm. But the best is to come. The cow’s ankles are placed on
plates before us. Salt and garlic are taken and we rub them into the
floppy skin and gristle hanging around the bones. And we bite. When
this is done I return to the soup, which is now setting into the glue
that, in more ignorant cultures, cows’ feet usually become. It is
nearly hard enough to take lumps out and hide them in my pockets.

; When we are done, Shirak says, “Now you are ready to work all day.”
But I don’t feel like that at all. What I really want to do is burp
safely and go to sleep. But below the nausea and the wooziness is a
little bit of pride – I’ve eaten khash. Over the next few days, I tell
Armenians this and they are impressed: “You ate khash? That is a man’s
dish.”

; Before I went there, an Armenian in London said, “You’ll hate it.
Much as I love my country, it has the worst cuisine in the world.” The
new Bradt guidebook – the only one for the country – is keen on
Armenia’s fresh ingredients, less so on the cooking: “In Britain or
France one goes to a restaurant for a good meal. In Armenia one goes
to a restaurant to give the wife of the family a rest and accepts that
the food will be worse than at home.”

; How bad could Armenian food be? I’ve eaten in a lot in places where
Michelin does not venture – and I’ve had some horrible food. The
cassava root stodges of West Africa, roast guinea pig in Peru, fried
tarantula in Cambodia, fermented mud-crab purée in Vietnam: all of
them delicacies as lovely to those who grew up with them as haggis is
to the Scots.

; Foods like these, born of necessity, often make an intriguing
journey from the plates of the poor to the tables of the gourmet rich.
Oysters were not a luxury in the 19th century. Sun-dried tomatoes did
not always come with a designer label. And frequently these foods
carry an encouraging myth by way of marketing: the Armenian king who
fancied the poor people’s cow’s foot soup is typical. Armenians of
their diaspora – there are more than half a million in the United
States – really love khash. There’s a Facebook group devoted to it,
and Californian-Armenian restaurants celebrate the beginning of the
“khash season”.

; “Most Armenian traditional food is created by poverty,” says Lilit
Chitchyan, a project manager who works with the United Nations in
Armenia. We are eating in a rather good roadside restaurant in the
northern province of Tavush: on the table, alongside a fried trout and
some salty cheese, is a dish called pruyr. This is chunks of pork fat
served on grilled potato, a delicacy. “When we were children my
grandmother would make us this dish of potato, boiled with onion and
thyme. It was all she had. Its name translates as ‘potato water’.” She
laughs at the look of commiseration on my face. “No, it was delicious.
We asked for it every time we visited.” Lilit tells me of another
childhood favourite, khangyal. “Boiled dough with yoghurt and onion on
it. Very tasty!” The cow’s feet from which khash is made are shipped
frozen to Armenia from European slaughterhouses. Armenia is not
allowed to trade any foods back to Europe. The obscure little
Christian country is a cul-de-sac, stuck in the Caucasus to the north
of Iran, surrounded by neighbours who, through history, have made a
habit of nibbling away bits of Armenian territory whenever they can.
The borders of two of them – Azerbaijan and Turkey – remain closed
today. Dependent through much of its modern history on Russia – not a
gourmet’s paradise – Armenia has always got the thin end of the loaf,
and now it is getting hungrier.

; Most of its staples – wheat flour, rice – are imported, and food
prices are rising rapidly, as they are across the world. Food-price
inflation was 14 per cent over the past year, twice as much as in
Britain. But the 50kg sack of flour that most poor families we meet
need to buy each month has doubled in price in three years. Eggs went
up 40 per cent over Christmas, amid dark mutterings of corruption and
cartels.

; Nothing seems to get better for the Armenian rural poor. When we
visit, a cruel late snowfall and frost looks as if it will, for the
second year running, destroy the blossom on most of the country’s
fruit trees. Last year an excessively hot and dry summer destroyed
most of the potato crop. Not long ago, the Minister of Agriculture
said that his only advice to the farmers was that they should go into
their fields and pray.

; He was sacked, and now the Government has told ministers to visit
the farmers and be photographed in the fields. As the rulers of every
fragile country have learnt this year, food prices cause riots, and
riots lead to revolution. The Armenian Government, though, does not
appear to have any other idea for addressing the problem of hunger in
the country.

; Long and grinding poverty explains a lot in Armenian cuisine, though
not everything. When food is short, it makes sense to use all the
protein you can get – and though most Britons might throw up their
hands in disgust at a dish like pruyr, it’s not so different from (and
probably more tasty than) the beef dripping on toast that our
grandparents loved.

; But how do you account for a dish like harissa? It is, quite simply,
a chicken boiled whole with wheat and nothing else, not even salt (the
Armenians were insistent on this). It’s boiled for a minimum of six
hours. And all the time it boils, you beat it. At the end, you pick
out the bones and serve it. It tastes pretty much as you’d expect –
thin porridge with a chicken flavour; not so very bad, but dismally
bland.

; We travel into the southern Armenian highlands, to a region called
Vayots Dzor, which translates as Gorge of Woes. It is sad indeed, a
land of harsh, jagged mountains, much of whose population are refugees
from Azerbaijan, Armenians driven out of that country when the two
neighbours went to war in the late Eighties. They live mainly in the
homes of Azeris who left under duress at the same time. The snow still
lies around the high villages; it is mid-April. Outside sub-Saharan
Africa, I have not seen people so poor.

; The first man we meet in the little village of Yeghegis – a target
site for an Oxfam programme trying to address rural poverty in Armenia
– shows us with triumph the first vegetables he’s managed to gather in
the fields since last autumn: a basket of young nettles he intends to
boil up for soup. Or sell. Children in these villages are clearly
malnourished, their growth stunted both mentally and physically. “We
have not eaten meat this year… Only one of my children has ever had
a banana,” says Yasmik Josephyan, a 29-year-old mother of five whom we
meet in Yeghegis. Khash, she says, is her favourite food, along with
barbecued meat and dolma (stuffed vine leaves) – but she has only
eaten these once in her life.

; We eat far better here in the mountains, where cow’s feet stew and
chicken porridge are a dreamt-of luxury, than we had in richer
Armenia. The first mushrooms are up, and people we meet fry them for
us with wild sorrel and eggs. Delicious home-preserved juices and jams
made from dogwood and buckthorn fruits, lavash bread and freshly made
yoghurty cheese appear in every household we visit. There is a
wonderful sour soup called spas, made of yoghurt and wheat. And, no
matter how poor the house, we are always offered coffee and usually
vodka.

; We go off into the hills foraging with Yasmik Josephyan. High, just
below the snow line, we come to the grounds of a ruined monastery.
Yasmik kneels on the turf and digs up white shoots like miniature
sticks of celery. This is mandak. Raw, it tastes a little lemony, a
little of fennel. In Armenia it is a rare delicacy, said to be good
for the heart: Yasmik and the other needy villagers can sell it to
traders for 200 drams (30p) a kilo. What are her shopping priorities?
“Potatoes, flour, school books and medicine,” she says.

; With typical generosity, Yasmik cooks the mandak for us to try. She
boils it for 30 minutes, fries it a little and then stirs an egg into
it – “an omelette”. She serves it with pasta fried brown and then
boiled. The cooked mandak tastes much less good than it had raw – like
parsley that has been boiled for 30 minutes. I deliver a rather
pompous lecture on how much she and the children would benefit from
the nutrients in the vegetable, which were surely lost with so much
boiling. Yasmik politely puts me right: “I know. And, of course, we
drink the water it was boiled in.”

; As Yasmik cooks, the electricity, always unreliable in the
mountains, comes on. A TV crackles into life. On it is a Russian
cookery programme. I groan at the irony of it. But Yasmik says, “I
love these programmes. They do make me feel hungry, but I can dream of
having those ingredients to cook with. Josepha [her eldest, 9 years
old] saw a pizza being made on the television and she wants one. I
would love to make her a pizza one day.” n Next week Oxfam launches a
campaign to address the failing food system and ever rising prices in
Armenia and other countries across the world. oxfam.org.uk/system

Before I went there, an Armenian in London said, ‘Much as I love my
country, it has the worst cuisine in the world’

‘We have not eaten meat this year,’ says Yasmik. ‘Only one of my five
children has ever had a banana’

France 5 ce matin à 10h25 L’Arménie dans « Echappées belles »

TELEVISION
France 5 ce matin à 10h25 L’Arménie dans « Echappées belles »
Rediffusion du documentaire de 90 minutes sur l’Arménie

Pour tous ceux qui n’ont pas regardé hier soir l’excellent magazine de
90 minutes « Echappées belles » France 5 consacré à l’Arménie, il
auront la possibilité de le voir ou de revoir pour ceux qui l’ont vu
hier soir. Le reportage présenté par la journaliste de France 5 Sophie
Jovillard nous a fait découvrir de nombreuses facettes de l’Arménie.
Sorte de guide touristique, l’émission de grande qualité permet aux
téléspectateurs français de plonger dans une aventure touristique et
culturelle en Arménie. A l’heure où le tourisme ne cesse d’augmenter
en Arménie, ce documentaire permettra sans doute à de nombreux
téléspectateurs Français de découvrir pour la première fois l’Arménie.
Et peut-être d’inscrire l’Arménie dans leur guide de voyage et de
préparer un séjour en Arménie. A voir ou revoir sans modération.

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 29 mai 2011,
Krikor [email protected]

BAKU: Minister: Azerbaijan, Int’l Organizations Agree On Metsamor NP

MINISTER: AZERBAIJAN, INT’L ORGANIZATIONS AGREE ON METSAMOR NPP’S THREATS

Trend
May 27 2011
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan and international organizations have already reached
a mutual agreement on the threat of the Metsamor NPP in Armenia,
Azerbaijani Ecology and Mineral Resources Minister Huseyngulu Bagirov
said at today’s press conference.

“Work on the Metsamor NPP is conducted constantly. I can say that a
new certificate is developed each month and is sent to the Foreign
Ministry,” Bagirov said.

The Metsamor NPP was built in 1970.

After the devastating Spitak earthquake the activity of this plant
had been suspended, but in 1995, despite international protests,
the work of the station was reactivated, and in addition, the second
reactor was launched.

Despite the fact that the EU has demanded the immediate closure of the
station until 2011 and declared its readiness to assign 100 million
euro to Armenia to cover its energy needs, the country has not agreed.

Armenia does not hide the fact that it intends to use Metsamor until
2016, and even in the longer term until 2031. Given the large number
of minor earthquakes in the past 10 years in this area, a disaster
would hurt the entire South Caucasus and the Middle East would be
seriously affected.

Stratfor: "The Region About To Trade Turmoil For Crisis"

STRATFOR: “THE REGION ABOUT TO TRADE TURMOIL FOR CRISIS”

Milaz.info

May 27 2011
Azerbaijan

US global analytical company published a book titled “A Crucible of
Nations: The Geopolitics of the Caucasus”

US global analytical company STRATFOR published a book titled “A
Crucible of Nations: The Geopolitics of the Caucasus”, APA reports.

The book’s introduction reads: “In the Caucasus, three great historical
empires converge: Russia, Persia and Turkey. They are no longer
empires but republics, and Persia has changed its name to Iran,
while Russia called itself the Soviet Union for seven decades. The
names, ideologies and fortunes have changed, but these three great
powers have this in common: Each is part of the Caucasus region but
has greater interests outside the Caucasus region. That means that
interests far away frequently drive the behavior of the three great
powers in the Caucasus. For all three powers, the Caucasus is sometimes
at the center of their thinking and sometimes an afterthought”.

“Another characteristic they share is that all three are rising
powers. Turkey is shaking off three generations of self-imposed
isolation and exploring its neighborhood. The process is awkward,
painful and plagued with mistakes and setbacks, but Ankara is tired
of having its fate determined by others and so has no choice but to
continue. Iran seeks to reach into the areas near it that have been
weakened by the Soviet collapse and the U.S. wars in the Islamic
world. Alone among the region’s states in its relative internal and
external security, Iran has many opportunities for expansion. The
post-Soviet collapse is over, and Russia’s twilight will not begin for
another decade, producing a rising tide of Russian power throughout its
periphery that seems irresistible – until it recedes. The attention
of all three powers shifts based on the demands of the day, but all
regularly cross gazes in the Caucasus”.

“There are also three nations entirely within the Caucasus that are
much smaller and weaker than those great powers: Armenia, Azerbaijan
and Georgia. They are ancient mountain cultures that have survived
because the rugged mountains provided natural barriers to invaders.

During the last century, Czarist Russia, and then the Soviet Union,
occupied all three nations. The Russians changed borders, moved
populations and forced cultural changes but were unable to suppress the
Caucasus peoples’ national self-awareness. Indeed, in odd ways, these
mountain cultures fought back by giving in. The Caucasus nations played
Politburo politics with the same ruthless cunning with which they
fought each other. The Georgians even gave the Russians Joseph Stalin”.

Each Caucasus country contains fragments of the populations of the
other countries in the region, and each contains smaller groups
– fragments of older nations. The claims about what belongs to
each of these nations and what was stolen from them date back for
centuries; yesterday and a thousand years ago are remembered with
equal vividness. The very antiquity of the cultures creates the most
contemporary conflicts”.

“Most Azerbaijanis, having been conquered by the Persians, live in
Iran. Russia has broken Georgia’s control over territory it claims.

Armenia claims a blood debt against Turkey over mass murders in
1915, while Azerbaijanis claim similar debts against Armenians. This
is not ancient history. Georgia fought a war with Russia in 2008,
Armenians and Azerbaijanis are currently edging toward a new war,
and Iranians infiltrate Azerbaijan regularly”.

“When all of the Caucasus is under the control of the three major
powers, the region tends to be more stable than when the three smaller
powers are independent. A smothering occupation limits the options for
the smaller nations. When the three smaller states are independent,
they attempt to purify their internal regions of smaller groups,
they compete with each other and they compete with the greater
powers. The friction creates both challenges and opportunities for
the greater powers. Wars become seen as just another tactic in the
balance-of-power game”.

“When STRATFOR steps back and look at the region broadly, we see a
region about to trade turmoil for crisis.

We find that the Russian hold on the North Caucasus is firm, but
that the challenge from Islamist and nationalist insurgents in
the region is substantial and growing. There is low but increasing
tension between Iran and Azerbaijan, both because northwestern Iran is
ethnically Azerbaijani and that Tehran and Baku have starkly different
outlooks. Turkey and Iran are sliding toward confrontation while
Armenia is in indefinite confrontation with Turkey. The conflict
between Armenia and Azerbaijan is almost certain to erupt into war
in the near future. Russian power has broken the Georgian state,
but Georgia’s position makes it the logical gateway for any outside
power that wishes to enter the game”.

The opportunities for a range of conflicts are substantial, and
the timing of such conflicts is unpredictable – and that is without
factoring in the United States, whose relations with Iran, Russia
and Turkey are hostile, cold and deteriorating, respectively.

http://milaz.info/en/news.php?id=5559