Child Abuse Needs Change In Public Attitudes In Armenia

CHILD ABUSE NEEDS CHANGE IN PUBLIC ATTITUDES IN ARMENIA

Institute for War and Peace Reporting, UK
IWPR Caucasus Reporting #769
March 2 2015

Police investigations can be flawed and public attitudes are often
unsympathetic.

by Marine Kharatyan

In 2011, child abuse hit the headlines in the Armenian media when a
13-year-old became pregnant after suffering systematic sexual violence
perpetrated by her father.

However, not only did attempts to prosecute the man fail, but the girl,
who lives in a town in southern Armenia, found herself ostracised by
the local community.

The girl had an abortion. Police filed a criminal casebut a DNA
examination was unable to confirm paternity. The case was closed due
to a lack of evidence.

The girl’s lawyer, Nona Galstyan, said there were problems with the
way the investigation was done.

“It became apparent during the investigation that some of [the girl’s]
testimony contradicted other evidence. Had the investigation been done
in a more comprehensive way, we would have been able to identify the
perpetrator,” she told IWPR.

While it was established beyond doubt the victim suffered violence,”the
investigation didn’t look at whether only one person or several were
involved. It focused only on the father and was halted,” Galstyan said.

Afterwards, the local community was less than sympathetic towards
the victim.

“Attitudes towards the family in the town were generally intolerant,”
journalist Susanna Shahnazaryan told IWPR. “I know that parents
complained in school, and felt that their children could not learn
in the same class [as the girl].”

The child’s mother said parents even organised a petition to have her
excluded. Eventually, she was suspended from school, although education
officials said this was because of prior behavioural problems.

Now 16, the girl is passing her exams after being tutored at home,
but her mother says she is lonely and still cannot understand why
she has no friends.

Experts say the case highlights concerns about how Armenia’s judicial
system and wider society deal with child sex abuse cases.

According to police figures, there has been a 150 per cent rise in the
number of criminal investigations involving sexual violence against
minors – including young children – over the last ten years.

Psychologist Tatevik Aghabekyan, head of the Sexual Violence Crisis
Centre, told IWPR that more than half the cases of sexual assault in
the country involve minors.

She attributes the rising number of recorded cases to improved media
coverage and greater public awareness, but says lot of ignorance
still surrounds the subject.

Aghabekyan says children are often afraid to report violence as they
do not realise it is the perpetrators who will be punished.

“Even underage victims are considered guilty,” she said. “People
think the blame lies with them or their parents.”

“It is important that society itself does not shun and isolate these
children… and that it helps ot bring them back to a normal life,”
Aghabekyan said.

David Tumanyan, a lawyer at the OSCE mission in Yerevan who specialises
in cases of abuse of minors, told IWPR that investigations were
generally carried out properly, but there were times when judges were
not supportive of the child.

“There was one case where a child had previously had sexual relations,
and the judge didn’t prevent the defence putting questions that were
designed to smear the victim’s past behaviour,” Tumanyan said.

He said that more work was also needed on rehabilitating thevictims
of abuse, particularly because of social attitudes to the issue.

“First of all, it’s essential to strengthen the protection of children
during the preliminary investigation and during trial, and later employ
social programmes to reintegrate them into society,” Tumanyan said.

In 2013, the penalties for sexual violence against minors were
toughened, and human rights activists hope this will have a positive
impact on child protection.

Armenia’s official human rights ombudsman, Karen Andreasyan, told
IWPR that the priority now was to inform children of their rights,
including within the family.

“We have seen many cases where family members bringing up a child think
it’s quite normal to hit them,” he said, adding that more needed to
be done to educate adults and children alike about their human rights.

Andreasyan pointed to a need to provide a safe space where children
could report incidents.

“We haven’t yet developed this kind of system. For this reason, I
cannot say that awareness or child protection has reached the right
level. Nor are there rehabilitation centres for abused children,
and work isn’t being done to prevent similar cases,” he added.

Armenian police say they have juvenile protection teams which hold
regular meetings in schools to make young people more aware of the
issues – how to spot abuse, and what to do about it.

Marine Kharatyan is a freelance journalist in Armenia.

https://iwpr.net/global-voices/child-abuse-needs-change-public-attitudes

NKR President Awards Medals To Killed Soldiers

NKR PRESIDENT AWARDS MEDALS TO KILLED SOLDIERS

19:01 | March 2,2015 | Official

President of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR) Bako Sahakyan has
signed decrees to award posthumously ‘For Service in Battle’ medals to
soldiers Artak Aghekyan (born in 1979) and Hayk Baroyan (born in 1995).

They were killed on February 28 in stopping the infiltration attempt
by Azerbaijani commandos in the section controlled by one of the
military units in the north-eastern direction of Nagorno-Karabakh.

http://en.a1plus.am/1207086.html

Kotchikian: Armenia Should Have Made Better Use Of Turkey’s Disrupti

KOTCHIKIAN: ARMENIA SHOULD HAVE MADE BETTER USE OF TURKEY’S DISRUPTIVE AND UNCOMPROMISING STANCE

19:11 02/03/2015 >> COMMENTS

Panorama.am has spoken with Dr. Asbed Kotchikian, senior lecturer
at Global Studies Department at Bentley University (US) and
Editor-in-Chief of Armenian Review, on some issues related to the
current phase of the Armenian-Turkish conflict and of the US-Turkey
relations.

– Dr. Kochikian, the RA President has recently recalled the
Armenian-Turkish protocols from the National Assembly, a move which
followed 6 years of Turkish non-action and destructive stance full
of preconditions regarding the normalization of bilateral relations.

Could you please comment on this behaviour of Turkey? What policy do
you think lay behind this attitude?

– The first thing one needs to think about is why President Sargsyan
signed the protocols in the first place and why he is retracting it
now after the protocols were suspended for almost 5 years.

Returning to the issue of Turkey’s policies and preconditions, there
is nothing new about the official Ankara stance on normalizing its
relations with Armenia. Since the 1990s the two preconditions to
normalize relations with Armenia, Turkey has always put forward were
the withdrawal of Armenian forces from what Ankara considered to be
‘occupied territories’ in Nagorno-Karabakh and the Armenian side
dropping the campaign to have Turkey recognize its responsibility
for the Genocide of Ottoman Armenians.

As for the reasons for such a policy, one has to realize that
Ankara’s solidarity with Baku over the past two decades is motivated by
geopolitical and economic interests that far outweigh the normalization
of relations with Armenia. In other words, normalizing relations with
Armenia could be viewed as a diplomatic achievement in Turkey and
nothing more, whereas antagonizing Azerbaijan would have economic
and financial consequences for Turkey in the form of decreased
Azerbaijani investments especially in Anatolia. By the same token,
linking normalization with Armenia with Yerevan dropping its support
to Genocide recognition campaign is directly related to the fact that
Ankara considers that as a nuisance and wants to settle the issue
of responsibility because of hears of territorial claims that might
follow such recognition.

– Despite the failure of the reconciliation process what gains, if any,
do you think the Armenian side has had during these years as a result
of its initiative to normalize the relations with Turkey? (What are
the lessons learned?)

– If I were to reformulate the question, I would ask “what gains could
the Armenian side have had with Ankara’s lack of interest to ratify
the protocols”? The main lesson I think is that Yerevan could have
played a more proactive role and could have used Turkey’s lack of
interest to ratify the protocols as a diplomatic initiative to show
the world that while Armenia is willing to normalize relations with
Turkey, it is the latter which comes up with hurdles and preconditions
to not open the border with Armenia. Had Armenia’s diplomacy been
more proactive, it would have taken a huge advantage of this fact
and could have levelled the playing field with Turkey by exercising
diplomatic pressure on Ankara. Imagine a situation where Armenia
could have publicized that it was all for normalizing relations with
Turkey without any preconditions and that it was Turkey which was
putting conditions and acting as a spoiler. That could have been a
great diplomatic move and would have changed the world’s perception
about Armenia’s foreign policy.

Other than the issue mentioned above, there have been no tangible
gains and lessons to learn, except for the fact that Turkey’s role
as an uncompromising and disruptive neighbour is further enhanced
in Armenian government and public circles. One thing that needs to
be added here is that the best strategy that Armenia can pursue to
resolve issues (or at least some of the issues) with Turkey is through
direct engagement with Ankara. In this context, direct engagement
means constant communication, discussions and the possibility to sign
agreements that deal with secondary issues (trade, transportation,
communication, etc.) to show that the Armenian side it making an
effort and it is Turkey that has been disruptive of the whole process.

– Don’t you think that Turkey is perceived as being uncompromising
and disruptive now in the eyes of the international community given
its respective behavior?

– I don’t think Turkey’s image in the international community is one
of uncompromising and disruptive in this case, mostly because of the
fact that Armenian foreign policy never used the non-ratification
of the protocols by Turkey as a diplomacy tool. True, there were
a lot of discussions in Armenian media about it but that was for
local consumption and the uncompromising position of Turkey was not
publicized in international circles as it should have been. This is
what I meant by a more proactive foreign policy and lost opportunity.

If Armenia really had wanted Turkey to ratify the protocols, then
it could have raised concerns about this and asked the guarantors of
that signature to pressure Turkey to ratify the protocols.

– What steps do you think should be taken to facilitate the awakening
of the civil society in Turkey, which is lobbying for the recognition
of the Armenian Genocide by the Turkish government?

– One needs to realize that in the past decade or so, Turkey has gone
through a lot of socio-political changes and transformation. There are
more civil society groups and citizen initiative groups that advocate
for a more free and democratic Turkey. It is important to understand
that the recognition by Turkey of the Ottoman responsibility for the
Armenian Genocide can only occur in a democratic Turkey. That being
said, just focusing on civil society groups in Turkey which only
deal with campaigning for Genocide recognition is a wrong strategy,
any movement that aims at creating a more democratic and free Turkey
should be supported. As citizens of Turkey, many Armenians have taken
part in this process and big advocates for democratization in Turkey
knowing full well that a free and democratic Turkey would also be
a place where Armenians (and other minorities) can talk about their
past, present and future in Turkey.

In this context, Armenia can only have a supporting role for such
movements, but to avoid hypocrisy, Armenia has to also develop its
own track record and develop a stronger sense of citizen participation
in politics and society (and not just from one election to another).

Tacit approval of any group in Turkey might have an opposite reaction
and opponents of such civil society groups can easily claim that
Armenia is meddling in the internal affairs of Turkey and those groups
in Turkey could easily be discredited.

– Could you comment on the current phase of the relations (and
tensions) between the United States and Turkey?

– The main issue dictating US-Turkey relations today is the rise of
The Islamic State in Iraq and Levant (ISIL) and the change of the
military and geopolitical landscape in the Middle East. From a US
perspective, Turkey remains an important ally in the region however
there is a growing frustration in Washington that Ankara is not doing
more to curb ISIL activities in the region (especially considering
that Turkey has over 1,000 kms of land border with Syria and Iraq).

The lack of Turkish involvement (perhaps very limited involvement)
in this conflict has not stopped US policy makers to maintain that
Turkey remains a (semi)reliable partner in the region and an important
player to stop the danger from ISIL to spread.

Prof. Asbed Kotchikian is a senior lecturer at the Global Studies
Department at Bentley University where he teaches courses on the
Middle East and former Soviet Union. He has published articles and book
chapters in various venues including Demokratizatsya, Insight Turkey,
and Central Asia and the Caucasus. His book, entitled The Dialectics
of Small States: Foreign Policy Making in Armenia and Georgia, was
published in 2008. He is also the editor-in-chief of the academic
peer reviewed journal, Armenian Review.

http://www.panorama.am/en/politics/2015/03/02/kotchikian/

Artsrun Hovhannisyan: Azerbaijani Side Embarks On A New And Lower Le

ARTSRUN HOVHANNISYAN: AZERBAIJANI SIDE EMBARKS ON A NEW AND LOWER LEVEL OF OBVIOUS FALSIFICATIONS

17:19 02/03/2015 >> POLITICS

The Azerbaijani media have once again made use of falsifications
publishing a black-and-white mute video which, as the Azerbaijani
media claims, shows ‘the liquidation of two Armenian soldiers by the
Azerbaijani forces.’

Watching that video it is even impossible to claim that it was taken
in NKR or on the frontline: neither landscape, nor human figures,
nor their forms, and nor the moment of the ‘liquidation’ are seen.

Commenting on the video for Panorama.am, Artsrun Hovhannisyan, a
spokesman for the Ministry of Defense of Armenia, stated, “It is not
serious: another low-quality, obscure video in the Azerbaijani media.

The Azerbaijani side has embarked on a new and lower level of obvious
falsifications which looks plainly ridiculous. Earlier the Armenian
side officially confirmed the death of 2 NKR Defense Army soldiers;
the NKR Defense Army report also included the cause of their death.

I’ve got nothing else to add,” he concluded.

At the beginning of February, the Azerbaijani media spread a
42-minutes-long video of extremely low quality, which allegedly
demonstrated the footage of how the Azerbaijani soldiers liquidated
‘the Armenian subversion group of six in their attempt to cross
the minefield in the frontline.’ However, because of the quality of
the above-mentioned video it was impossible even to confirm that it
demonstrated soldiers. It was also difficult to tell by the landscape
and surroundings when or where it had been taken. It could only
be noticed that the video had been taken in the daytime; yet the
subversions, as it is well-known, do not take place in the daytime.

The very moment of the “diversionists'” liquidation is not observed
in the video.

Source: Panorama.am

Antelias News

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department

Tel: (+961- 4) 410001, 410003
Fax: (+961- 4) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:
PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

The Catholicosate of Cilicia remains committed to Ecumenism

Antelias – The clergy continue to share the concerns of churches in
the region and build ecumenical relations by representing the
Catholicosate at special events.

Rev. Housig Mardirossian, the Ecumenical Officer, attended the 25th
Anniversary celebrations of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the
Middle East. He presented His Holiness Aram I’s greetings to Patriarch
Laham and his message to the bishops, inviting them to strengthen
ecumenical relations in the region.

Bishop Norayr Ashekian transmitted the condolences of Catholicos Aram I
to the Coptic Bishop of Lebanon for the decapitation of 21 Coptic
Christians in Libya by Muslim fundamentalists.

Archbishop Shahé Panossian, Prelate of Lebanon, represented His
Holiness Aram I at the special event organized by the Syriac Catholic
Church, launching the 100th anniversary commemorative activities of the
massacre of their faithful by Turkey. On behalf of the Catholicos, he
expressed the solidarity of the Armenian people with the Syriac Church
against this inhuman crime.

Memorial Service for the victims of Sumgayit victims in Antelias

Antelias – 1 March 2015. On Sunday, following the Holy Liturgy at the
St. Gregory the Illuminator Cathedral in Antelias, His Holiness Aram I
presided over the memorial service for the Armenian victims of the
massacres by Azeris in Sumgayit 27 years ago. The service was a reminder
of the impunity enjoyed by selective states since the Armenian Genocide
100 years by Turkey.

The Sixth meeting between the Catholicosate of Cilicia and the
Center for the Islamic Culture & Relations of Islamic Republic of Iran
Will begin in Antelias

Antelias – 3 March 2013. On Tuesday His Holiness Aram I will preside
over the opening of the 6th biennial meeting in Antelias. The dialogue
between the Catholicosate of Cilicia and the Islamic Republic of Iran
began 15 years ago and takes place interchangeably between Tehran and
Antelias.

During the two-day meeting 25 experts representing the Catholicosate and
the Islamic Culture Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran will discuss
the theme `the imperative of Christian-Muslim dialogue for justice and
sustainable peace in the Middle East.’ The meeting will conclude with
a joint statement.

His Holiness Aram I condemns the kidnapping of Christians and monitors
the situation of Armenians

Antelias – 2 March 2013. After a brief absence, His Holiness Aram I
returned to Lebanon and received Mor Theophilus George Saliba,
Metropolitan of Mount Lebanon, Syrian Orthodox Archbishopric and
Secretary to the Holy Synod, who described to him the recent attacks on
the Christian villages in the Al-Hasakeh region of Syria near the far
northeast of the country. According to the Metropolitan, many churches
were burnt and hundreds of members of the community kidnapped by
fundamentalists.

After condemning the violent act against the Christians and to preempt
similar acts, Catholicos Aram I spoke of the importance of monitoring
the situation and the urgency of promoting Christian-Muslim dialogue.

Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
PO Box : 70 317 Antelias – LEBANON
Tel: (+961-4) 410 001 / 3
Fax: (+961-4) 419724
E-mail: [email protected]

www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org

Book: The Great Fire: One American’s Mission To Rescue Victims Of Th

THE GREAT FIRE: ONE AMERICAN’S MISSION TO RESCUE VICTIMS OF THE 20TH CENTURY’S FIRST GENOCIDE

Kirkus Reviews (Print)
March 1, 2015, Sunday

SECTION: NONFICTION

Ureneck (Journalism/Boston Univ.; Cabin: Two Brothers, a Dream and
Five Acres in Maine, 2011, etc.) brings to light the miracles of
a little-known hero.In 1922, Asa Jennings was a Methodist minister
working as a secretary for the YMCA assigned to Smyrna, located in
modern-day Turkey. Smyrna, occupied by Greece, was the richest and
most multicultural city of the eastern Mediterranean.

Jennings and his family arrived shortly after the Turkish Nationalist
Army defeated the Greeks at Afyonkarahisar-Eskishehir. The
Nationalist’s leader, Mustafa Kemal, continued the policies of the
“Young Turks” who had taken over the government. Ureneck’s research
is thorough and wide-ranging as he explains the 500 years of conflict
between Greece and Turkey, the World War I years of the Armenian
genocide, and the new government’s policy of Turkey for the Turks,
barring all others. Jennings’ appeals for evacuation to the American
senior Naval officer, Adm. Mark Lambert Bristol, were generally
ignored. Bristol was a well-known supporter of the Nationalists and
harbored little sympathy for the refugees. With the backing of the
heroic commander of the USS Edsall, Halsey Powell, and the help of
the Greek commander of the Kilkis, they managed to evacuate more than
250,000 people from Smyrna in only seven days. With no Allied ships,
they convinced the Greeks to lend merchant ships and then persuaded
the Turks to allow them into the harbor under American escort, as
long as they didn’t fly the Greek flag. Powell certainly fudged his
orders by escorting the ships, and Jennings worked night and day to
move the refugees to a safe location. The story, especially that of
Jennings, crippled by tuberculosis and typhoid, is remarkable, and
Ureneck delivers it with a wonderful style that grabs and holds the
reader’s attention. An inspiring illumination of a hero who deserves
recognition.

Publication Date: 2015-05-12 Publisher: Ecco/HarperCollins Stage:
Adult ISBN: 978-0-06-225988-2 Price: $26.99 Author: Ureneck, Lou

The Unfinished War against Christians

Gilmer Mirror, TX
March 1 2015

The Unfinished War against Christians

WASHINGTON, DC – During a rousing talk at the DuPont Circle Hotel,
sponsored by the Woman’s National Democratic Club (WNDC), Joe David,
author of The Infidels, took a sell-out crowd of WNDC members and
their guests on a journey to the beginning of Christianity over two
thousand years ago.

“With little more than a Bible, a cross and some bread,” David said,
“the early Assyrian Christian missionaries followed the trade route
(known generally as the Silk Route) to China and spread the gospel,
according to Jesus to world. By the 12tth Century, The Assyrian Church
of the East became the largest church in the world with over 80
million followers, larger than the Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox
Churches combined.”

Unfortunately, these peaceful and cultured Assyrians who build the
first Christian nation on the ruins of the ancient Assyrian empire
faced a major threat in 630 AD. “With the fall of the Eastern Roman
Empire in 1453, Christianity in the Middle East was boldly reduced to
ashes, leaving behind only a few sparks of life here and there. The
cause: the rise of radical Islam which left its imprint on the area by
brutally slaughtering millions of Christians.”

By revisiting the past, David identified the uninterrupted pattern of
genocide, perpetrated by radical Muslims against Christians that began
in the 7th Century. “I worry,” he said, “that if we don’t acknowledge
the lessons taught to us by history and end today’s terrorism, we may
soon see a holocaust like none before it.”

The Infidels is David’s sixth book. It is about one aspect of the
often overlooked war in Middle East, when the Muslim Turks, with the
blessings of the Germans, began to savagely massacre nearly two
million Christians during a jihad, declared to cleanse the Ottoman
Empire of racial impurities, exactly 100 years ago. The book is a
novelization of his mother’s experience in Persia during World War I.

The Book Only London’s Thames River Press Was Brave Enough To Publish

The Infidels
by Joe David

A terrifying story about a religious war Led by the Muslim Turks
against the Christians

Joe David’s latest book is in the great tradition of novels like Forty
Days of Musa Dagh and histories like the Rape of Nanking. It reveals
the scars of brutality and inhumanity as history intersects with the
ordinary lives of innocent people.

Editor George Thomas Kurian

The World Christian Encyclopedia (Oxford University Press, 2001)

The Nelson New Christian Dictionary (Thomas Nelson, 2002)

I found Joe David’s version of a rarely discussed genocide, the
plotted murder of the Assyrians by the Kurds and the Turks during
World War I, to be thoroughly engrossing. In writing his novel, David
not only demonstrates a significant knowledge of the customs and
history of the times, but he also vividly brings to life the past in
an exciting and meaningful way.

Anahit Khosroeva, PhD

Senior Researcher, Institute of History

National Academy of Sciences of Armenia

The Great War began with two shots: one aimed at the Archduke Franz
Ferdinand, heir to the Hapsburg throne, and the other aimed at his
wife, Sophie. What many thought would be just another Balkan squabble
quickly escalated into a major war felt around the world.

As Europe burst into flames and millions of soldiers began battling
the forces of nationalism, the Ottoman Turks joined arms with the
Germans and extended the conflict to their longtime enemies, the
Russians and the Christians. Incited by secular leaders in
Constantinople, northwestern Persia became a warzone in which radical
religious tribes invaded Christian villages and systematically
martyred hundreds of thousands of ‘infidels” who dared to resist
conversion.

On a small slice of ancient, isolated land owned by a wealthy Assyrian
family, a young Christian girl awakens to the brutal massacre of her
race in a war that she is too young to understand. Stripped of her
privileged and comfortable existence, pursued by a Muslim governor – a
symbol of the rising new world order – and surrounded by hostility and
greed, deep-sated hatred and unspeakable horrors, she must somehow
come to terms with the nightmare that her life has become.

Visit the past to grasp the present – and the terror facing us in the future

Author: Joe David’s first book, The Fire Within, because of its
successful dramatization of important issues in education, made the
reading list at two universities and received national public
attention in the 1980s. For nearly nine years, he was a frequent radio
and television talk show guest in major U.S. cities, where he candidly
discussed issues in education.

Over the years, he has written for professional journals, newspapers,
magazines, newsletters, and books, including the Annenberg/CPB Math
and Science Project, NPR Radio (The Best of Our Knowledge), The Forum
(University of West Florida), U.S. Airways, Basic Education (Council
for Basic Education), Christian Science Monitor, and much more. He is
the author of six books.

Author Joe David’s national TV interview

with Connie Martinson can be viewed on YouTube.

http://www.gilmermirror.com/view/full_story/26497219/article-The-Unfinished-War-against-Christians—?instance=news_special_coverage_right_column

Le Parti Republicain Attend De Connaitre Le Message Du BHK

LE PARTI REPUBLICAIN ATTEND DE CONNAITRE LE MESSAGE DU BHK

Politique

Le parti republicain va attendre de voir les messages politiques
que le BHK envoie au public lors du congrès prevu le mois prochain,
a declare l’un des porte-paroles du parti au pouvoir.

Selon le vice-president du Parlement Eduard Sharmazanov, la reunion
de l’organe executif du HHK qui s’est tenue jeudi soir n’avait pas
le BHK a l’ordre du jour.

Le 12 fevrier, le HHK avait tenu une reunion traitant de la situation
politique interieure.

“Nous allons attendre de voir ce que le BHK decide le 5 mars, s’il
elit ou non un nouveau chef ou un nouvel organisme de reglementation,
quel programme il va adopter et quel message il va adresser au public”,
a declare Sharmazanov.

Le porte-parole du HHK a egalement confirme que Serge Sarkissian
donnera son avis sur la reforme constitutionnelle envisagee fin
de mars.

lundi 2 mars 2015, Claire (c)armenews.com

Armenian Members Of Lebanese Parliament Meet With Prime Minister

ARMENIAN MEMBERS OF LEBANESE PARLIAMENT MEET WITH PRIME MINISTER

By MassisPost
Updated: March 1, 2015

BEIRUT, LEBANON – Social Democratic Hunchakian Party Central Committee
Vice Chairman, and Member of the Lebanese Parliament Sebouh Kalpakian,
along with Member of Parliament Jean Ogassapian, visited Prime Minister
Tammam Salam to discuss the country’s overall development, political
and security issues, as well as issues of concern to Armenians in a
Feb. 28 meeting.

Referring to the internal Lebanese situation, Kalpakian and Ogassapian,
stressed the government continue convening sessions necessary for
the discussion of urgent issues and finding solutions of concern for
citizens. Among the issues of concern to the Armenian community of
Lebanon, the Parliamentarians presented the Prime Minister with the
upcoming Armenian Genocide Centennial commemorative ceremonies to
be held in Lebanon in addition to the official Republic of Armenia
Armenian Genocide Centennial commemorative events.

http://massispost.com/2015/03/armenian-members-of-lebanese-parliament-meet-with-prime-minister/