ANI, AGMA & ASSEMBLY Exhibit ‘The First Deportation: The German Rail

NEW EXHIBIT ‘THE FIRST DEPORTATION: THE GERMAN RAILROAD, THE AMERICAN
HOSPITAL, AND THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE’ RELEASED BY ANI, AGMA & ASSEMBLY

Armenian National Institute
1334 G Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20005

ARMENIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Date: January 30, 2015
Contact: Press Office
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (202) 383-9009

A Digital Exhibit Based on United States National Archives Photographs

Teaching Staff of the Apostolic Institute in Konya

Washington, DC – A third digital exhibit on the Armenian Genocide
consisting of 128 images on 24 panels entitled “The First Deportation:
The German Railroad, the American Hospital, and the Armenian Genocide”
was released today by the Armenian National Institute (ANI), Armenian
Genocide Museum of America (AGMA) and Armenian Assembly of
America(Assembly). Available on the ANI, AGMA, and Assembly websites,
the exhibit focuses on two localities, Zeytun, an Armenian city in the
Taurus Mountains, and Konya, a Turkish city in the central Anatolian
plain, both linked by the Armenian Genocide.

The remote and self-sustaining city of Zeytun was the first Armenian
community in Ottoman Turkey deported en masse in April 1915. To
deprive the Zeytun Armenians of any capacity to defy the deportation
edicts, the Young Turk government divided its population sending one
part east toward the Syrian Desert and another part west to the barren
flats of the Konya Plain.

By this fate, the Zeytun deportees were routed down from their
mountain homes through the nearby city of Marash and the Cilician
Plain and back up through the high passes of the Cilician Gates of the
Taurus Range, the only accessible road from Cilicia to Anatolia. This
route also placed them along the Berlin-Bagdad rail line then under
construction through those very same passes.

By intersecting that rail line, Zeytun Armenians soon found themselves
among the rest of the Armenian population of western Anatolia being
deported east by train to the main terminus at Konya and substations
beyond, where they were offloaded from cattle cars to walk down the
mountain passes, while work crews led by German and Swiss engineers
were cutting open new roads and tunnels to complete the construction
of the rail system.

There also happened to be an American hospital in Konya manned by
three outstanding figures who soon found themselves in the midst of
hundreds of thousands of Armenian deportees and as such became
witnesses to the unfolding of the Armenian Genocide. The station at
Konya was supposed to serve only as a transit camp, but with all of
the Armenians of western and central Anatolia routed through the city,
the open spaces beyond the station transformed into a vast
concentration camp. Because Konya was never intended to exist as a
destination camp and was evacuated within a short time, it has been
forgotten as a major site in the trail of deportation and the central
object of what transpired there overlooked. It was evident to all
observers in the city how rapidly the Ottoman Turkish government
reduced an industrious and prosperous people to misery. In Konya it
was already visible that all it took was a matter of days, not even
weeks.

The testimony provided by Dr. Wilfred Post and Dr. William Dodd, and
the efforts of Miss Emma Cushman, all three American medical
missionaries, provide compelling information about the rapidly
deteriorating conditions along the rail line and the start of the
process of extinguishing Armenian life across the region. Their
information is paralleled by the protests of German civilians in the
same area who sharply criticized the Ottoman authorities and raised
questions with their own government about the morality of German
wartime policies.

More compelling still were the photographs taken by Dr. Wilfred Post
and the German railroad engineers that documented the wartime reality
on this particular swath of Ottoman territory. While as wartime allies
of the Turks, Germans enjoyed a certain amount of liberty in their
actions, Dr. Post took a serious risk in defying the ban on
photographing the Armenians.

Retrieved from the United States National Archives, the entire set of
photographs taken by Dr. Wilfred Post are being issued for the first
time in this exhibit. They constitute the central evidence around
which the entire exhibit is constructed.

Dr. Post captioned the photographs, and succeeded in delivering them
to the American Embassy in Constantinople, the Ottoman capital, from
where they were sent by diplomatic pouch to Washington, DC. They might
have been the very first images of the Armenian Genocide to arrive
into the hands of U.S. officials. In this regard, the historic value
of Dr. Post’s photographs are matched only by those taken by U.S.
consul Leslie Davis who documented the Armenian Genocide in the region
of Harput/Kharpert.
Ottoman Minister of War Enver at Rail Station in Taurus Mountains
Because of the numbers of Armenians being deported and the pace at
which the western Anatolian cities were emptied of their Armenian
inhabitants, the Konya train station became a choke point in the
deportation process. Vast concentration camps of homeless Armenian
families soon formed along the tracks. The brutality of the process,
the complete lack of sanitation, and the absence of sources of food
very rapidly created an explosive situation threatening the spread of
epidemics. Thousands of Armenians never made it beyond the stations of
the Konya line and conditions in the refugee camps were so foul and
violent that a train conductor is quoted by Dr. Dodd describing the
Bozanti station as “hell on earth.”

Consisting of 121 images, 7 maps, and containing a rich variety of
eyewitness testimony, the exhibit reconstructs Armenian life in
Zeytun, reproduces the two rare photographs showing the arrest of the
Zeytun men, outlines the deportation route to the degree that
contemporary photographs allow, depicts the city of Konya, showing the
contrast between the rugged mountains in which Zeytun Armenians were
accustomed to living and the flat, arid, and sparsely populated plain
of Konya.

The exhibit includes previously unpublished photographs of Zeytun,
reproduces newly released images from German sources, and, in addition
to the United States National Archives material, presents images from
the Australian War Memorial; University of Newcastle upon Tyne,
England, Gertrude Bell Archives; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
Kelsey Museum; Mennonite Church USA Archives; the Armenian Missionary
Association of America and the Haigazian University Archives of
Beirut, Lebanon; Library of Congress; Republic of Armenia National
Archives; as well as online resources and private individuals.

ANI especially recognizes the historian Aram Arkun whose close study
of documentary sources addressed the complex situation surrounding the
denouement in Zeytun and who served as project consultant for the
exhibit. ANI also thanks Gunter Hartnagel, a professional
photographer, who provided valuable guidance on German historical
images, and whose researches in historical geography helped understand
the terrain that was covered by the Zeytun deportees and appreciate
the hardships endured by those who trudged through the mountains of
Cilicia at the point of a bayonet.

The location of Konya on the train line also helped to document the
post-war situation in the city. Accompanying a U.S. aid mission and
relief workers, the American photographer George Robert Swain recorded
the efforts of Miss Cushman to create a safe haven for surviving
Armenian orphans. In so doing Swain added another layer of
documentation about the fate of the Armenian population and helped
create, in sum with Dr. Post’s pictures, one of the more comprehensive
photographic records of a single location so directly impacted by the
Armenian Genocide.

The final demise of the Armenians of Konya was sealed with the fate of
Dr. Armenag Haigazian who, as a highly-regarded educator, embodied the
Armenian Protestant community’s hope of recovery. He had survived the
war years and the violence of the Young Turk regime, but his
restoration of the Apostolic Institute made him the target of the
Turkish Nationalist movement, which saw to the shuttering of the
school and the second exile and persecution of Dr. Haigazian. World
War I may have ended and the Young Turk government overthrown, but the
Armenian Genocide in Turkey continued, making the death of Dr.
Haigazian a most poignant tragedy, especially as he famously held a
doctorate from Yale University.

This third digital exhibit continues and builds upon the themes
developed in the exhibits released earlier, including the role and
fate of Armenian clergy, churches and schools, the role of American
missionaries and relief workers, and the role of Germans in Ottoman
Turkey, while distinguishing between the attitudes of civilian,
military, and diplomatic representatives.

The exhibit highlights the unsolvable dilemma faced by the Armenian
Catholicos of Cilicia Sahag II Khabayan, who, unaware of the broader
scheme about to be implemented by the Young Turk regime, advised the
Zeytun population to cooperate with the authorities in the hope of
avoiding a repetition of the Cilician massacres that spread terror
across the region a mere six years earlier. The acts and observations
of other clergymen, including Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople
Zaven Der Yeghiayan, his successor Archbishop Mesrob Naroyan,
Archbishop Stepannos Hovagimian of Ismit, Grigoris Balakian, and
Reverend William Peet, are also explained as part of the testimony on
this specific aspect of the Armenian Genocide.

The exhibit also highlights the role of an exceptional Ottoman
official, who, as governor of Aleppo and of Konya, opposed the
measures of the Young Turk radicals. Jelal Bey was the highest
ranking administrator in the Ottoman Empire who disapproved of the
policies of the triumvirate ruling from Constantinople. A number of
lower ranking officials who disagreed with the regime were killed by
Young Turk party henchmen. Opposing the Young Turk regime required
courage, and Jelal placed his life in jeopardy. He may have been
spared only because of his stature and lifelong service to the state.
American Hospital in Konya
The exhibit also reveals the involvement of a German diplomat, who as
an embassy councilor in Constantinople played a role in maintaining
German-Turkish relations, and as such became among the recipients of
the flow of information being reported about the implementation of the
Armenian Genocide. A lesser official at the time, Konstantin von
Neurath rose through the ranks eventually to serve as Minister of
Foreign Affairs in Nazi Germany and as governor of occupied
Czechoslovakia, where Reinhard Heydrich, one of the architects of the
Holocaust, served as his deputy.

The exhibit concludes with testimony from Dr. Charles Mahjoubian, a
native of Konya who resettled in Philadelphia and entered the
profession of dentistry. As a survivor, he committed himself to
testifying to the events he witnessed in his hometown. He pointed
with pride to his birthplace as one of the earliest centers of
Christianity, dating to St. Paul preaching in Iconium (ancient name of
Konya), and as a center of Turkish Islam where religious piety
restrained the hand of the local population, in sharp relief to the
political fanaticism of the Young Turk regime and the brutality of its
associates. According to Mahjoubian, by a strict reading of the
banishment legislation, Jelal Bey succeeded for a brief while in
delaying the deportation of Catholic and Protestant Armenians.

“The First Deportation: the German Railway, the American Hospital, and
the Armenian Genocide” strengthens and clarifies the photographic
documentation of the Armenian Genocide in a manner consistent and
supportive of third party records, eyewitness accounts and survivor
testimony. It expands the scope of the evidence and attests to the
horrors that unfolded in 1915.

“It did not escape contemporaries that there were immediate lessons to
be drawn from the example of Zeytun,” observed Van Z. Krikorian, ANI
chairman. “Other communities grasped the methods by which the Young
Turk regime pressurized local politics and aggravated relations among
religious and ethnic groups in order to create conditions to justify
the wholesale depopulation of Armenian towns and cities. Reverend
Ephraim Jernazian drew a direct connection between the failure of the
Zeytun Armenians to stand their ground and the heroic defense of their
neighborhood by Urfa Armenians. Hopeless as their actions might have
been at the time, the Armenians of Urfa made the point that they would
not be submitting to tyranny willingly, nor give up their lives easily
to help fulfill the violent designs of the Young Turks.”

“The clarity of that lesson from the past resonates today with the
necessary defense of Nagorno Karabakh where Armenians yet again a
century later face another enemy whose objective remains their
expulsion from their homeland. The commitment of the Armenians of
Artsakh to avoid the fate of the Western Armenian population was
inspired by the tragedies of the Armenian Genocide and the pledge of
survivors to avoid a repeat of such a calamity,” concluded Krikorian.
“I want to thank Rouben Adalian for uncovering these valuable records
on the Armenian Genocide, and Joe Piatt and Aline Maksoudian for
working with Dr. Adalian in creating this impressive exhibit,”
Krikorian added.

“Relief workers, educators, missionaries, orphanage administrators,
and other volunteers from the United States played a massive role in
relieving the plight of the survivors,” stated ANI Director, Dr.
Rouben Adalian. “Many of the longtime American residents of Turkey
also witnessed and reported the deportations and massacres of 1915.
Because of the remoteness of Konya from the other major centers of the
Armenian Genocide, Dr. Wilfred Post, Dr. William Dodd, and Miss Emma
Cushman may not have been extended the recognition they deserve. The
compelling evidence of this exhibit now ranks them among the heroic
Americans who helped save lives during the Armenian Genocide.”

As with the exhibits previously released jointly by ANI, AGMA, and the
Assembly, titledWitness to the Armenian Genocide: Photographs by the
Perpetrators’ German and Austro-Hungarian Allies, and The First Refuge
and the Last Defense: The Armenian Church, Etchmiadzin, and The
Armenian Genocide, “The First Deportation: The German Railroad, the
American Hospital, and the Armenian Genocide,” is also being issued in
digital format for worldwide distribution free of charge on the
occasion of the centennial of the Armenian Genocide.

Founded in 1997, the Armenian National Institute (ANI) is a 501(c)(3)
educational charity based in Washington, DC, and is dedicated to the
study, research, and affirmation of the Armenian Genocide.

###

NR#: 2015-03

Photo Caption 1: Teaching Staff of the Apostolic Institute in Konya.

Photo Caption 2: Ottoman Minister of War Enver at rail station in
Taurus Mountains.

Photo Caption 3: American Hospital in Konya.

www.Armenian-Genocide.org

L’Arménien Samvel Garabédian, propriétaire du groupe << Tashir >> di

FORTUNES
L’Arménien Samvel Garabédian, propriétaire du groupe >
dispose d’après Forbès du 2ème plus important revenu immobilier de
Russie avec plus d’un milliard de dollars

L’Arménien Samvel Garabédian, le propriétaire du groupe >
occupe selon le mensuel Forbes la 2ème place des . La 3ème place est occupée par la famille d’Ingvar Hambard
propriétaire du groupe >.

Krikor Amirzayan

samedi 31 janvier 2015,
Krikor Amirzayan (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=107589

2014 Annual Report: 65 Incidents of Journalists’ Rights Violations

2014 Annual Report: 65 Incidents of Journalists’ Rights Violations

01.30.2015 18:17 epress.am

The number of violations of journalists and media outlet rights in
2014 has decreased from 77 to 65 compared to 2013, states the Defense
of Freedom of Expression Committee’s annual report. Regardless of the
fact, the report’s authors consider the change to be discouraging
because 2014, compared to 2013, had no national elections, which
usually have violations of journalists’ rights.

The Freedom of Expression Committee considers the number of rights
violated alarming and disturbing.

According to the report, in 2014 incidents of physical violence
against journalists were registered at 9 (previous year, 10), pressure
against journalists were registered at 43 (previous year, 57),
violation of receiving and dispersing information registered at 13
(previous year, 10).

While presenting the report, the Committee chairman Ashot Melikyan
stated that the presented numbers do not claim to be absolute truths,
because many incidents are not raised by journalists whose rights are
violated.

During 2014, 22 new cases related to mass media outlets’ rights were
initiated by courts. The Freedom of Expression Committee expert Vasak
Darbinyan noted that in cases of physical violence against
journalists, the large portion of violence is implemented by police
officers. Darbinyan recalled an incident of violence by police on
Chorord Inknishkhanutyun daily’s journalist Ani Gevorgyan and am
ilur.am site cameraman Sargis Gevorgyan. He stressed that no
journalist has been successful in restoring their rights through a
judicial process. There have been cases which have not even reached
the courts.

“The Armenian courts have assigned the Special Investigation Service
to deal with the incident, while the latter covers up the cases, with
the standard “lack of criminal intent” basis. And those occur in the
situation where the act of violence is caught on film and posted on
the internet,” note the report’s authors.

A similar incident occurred when an a1plus.am site journalist Marine
Khachatryan was attacked in front of the National Assembly by the NA
security head Karen Hayrapetyan.

http://www.epress.am/en/2015/01/30/2014-annual-report-65-incidents-of-journalists-rights-violations.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJoALTPLTI0

Armenian Government might issue Eurobonds again

Armenian Government might issue Eurobonds again

January 30, 2015 16:11

The Armenian government is preparing to distribute new Eurobonds and
has approved the decision on concluding agreements with the
international legal consultant and the main distributor.

STEPANAKERT, JANUARY 30, ARTSAKHPRESS: Armenia’s Deputy Minister of
Finance Vakhtang Mirumyan mentioned that measures need to be taken to
ensure the inflow of foreign capital in order to neutralize the
negative impact that the recent developments in the global economy
have been having on Armenia’s economy.

According to him, there is currently a favorable environment in the
global financial markets for the distribution of foreign bonds and,
taking into consideration the shifts in the market, that might be a
possibility in the short run. In response, Deputy Prime Minister of
the Republic of Armenia, Minister of International Economic
Integration Vache Gabrielyan mentioned that this measure is strictly
important. “We must not only view it from the angle of bringing in
capital.

We’re talking about the opportunities of receiving money from global
markets. I can inform you that at this moment, the bonds of the
Republic of Armenia are at a favorable percentage threshold in the
secondary market. In 2013, Armenia distributed Eurobonds at 6 percent.
Now, trade is being made in the global and secondary markets at the
same percentage rate. If we can include these sums, that will also be
an important signal,” Gabrielyan said, as “Armenpress” reports.

http://artsakhpress.am/eng/news/11471/armenian-government-might-issue-eurobonds-again.html

Armenian president again blasts Ankara over April 24 invitation

Armenian president again blasts Ankara over April 24 invitation

GENOCIDE | 30.01.15 | 11:00

Photo:

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan described as “cynical and
shortsighted” the recent invitation by his Turkish counterpart to
attend events marking the 100th anniversary of the Battle of Gallipoli
in Istanbul on April 24 – the day when Armenians around the world will
be marking the centennial of the Genocide committed in Ottoman Turkey.

“They say all measures are suitable in politics. But I believe
official Ankara offered a bad service to itself in this matter,”
Sargsyan said during Thursday’s fifth session of the State Commission
for the Coordination of the Events for the commemoration of the 100th
anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

In mid-January Recep Tayyip Erdogan sent out invitations to the
leaders of more than a hundred countries, including the Armenian
president, to come to Turkey for the massive ceremonies.

Sargsyan immediately replied then reminding Erdogan about his earlier
invitation to him to come to Yerevan “to face up to history” on April
24. The Armenian president also called the Turkish move a “primitive”
attempt to overshadow the centenary of the Armenian Genocide in the
Ottoman Empire.

Meanwhile, on Thursday the State Commission for the Coordination of
the Events for the commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide made a “pan-Armenian declaration” on the Centennial
of the Armenian Genocide.

The commission headed by President Sargsyan and comprising senior
Armenian state officials, the top clerics of the Armenian Apostolic
Church and Diaspora leaders met in Yerevan to discuss final
preparations for the anniversary commemorations. Sargsyan read out the
declaration adopted by them at the Tsitsernakaberd Genocide Memorial
Complex.

The document made of 12 points, in particular, expresses “the united
will of Armenia and the Armenian people to achieve worldwide
recognition of the Armenian Genocide and the elimination of the
consequences of the Genocide, preparing to this end a file of legal
claims as a point of departure in the process of restoring individual,
communal and pan-Armenian rights and legitimate interests.”

The declaration calls on the Turkish state to “face up to its own
history and past” by ending its long-running denial of the genocide.
It also praises a growing number of Turks acknowledging the genocidal
character of the 1915 mass killings and deportations of Armenians.

http://armenianow.com/genocide/60198/armenia_genocide_turkey_erdogan_sargsyan_invitation
www.president.am

BAKU: Azerbaijan appeals ECHR over Armenia-captured hostages

AzerNews, Azerbaijan
Jan 30 2015

Azerbaijan appeals ECHR over Armenia-captured hostages

30 January 2015, 18:34 (GMT+04:00)
By Mushvig Mehdiyev

Azerbaijan delivered a letter of appeal to the European Court of Human
Rights over the fate of Dilgam Asgarov, Shahbaz Guliyev and Hasan
Hasanov, Azerbaijanis taken hostage by Armenia.

Violation of rights of the Azerbaijani hostages was outlined in the
letter, Anar Bagirov, Head of the Center for Legal Reforms of
Azerbaijan, said at the press-conference on January 30.

“Photos and other proofs reflecting Armenia’s inhuman treatments of
the hostages were attached to the letter, as well,” Bagirov said.

The ECHR has already received the letter and will reply it soon.

The Armenian special forces took hostage Hasan Hasanov, Shahbaz
Guliyev and Dilgam Asgarov in the Shaplar village of the occupied
Kalbajar region on July 11 last year, while they were visiting the
graves of their relatives.

Following the show trial in Nagorno-Karabakh Dilgam Asgarov was
sentenced to life imprisonment, while Shahbaz Guliyev was sentenced to
22 years in jail.

One of the hostages, Hasan Hasanov, was killed before he was taken to
the so-called “court” in Nagorno -Karabakh.

The international community is persistently urging the Armenian
authorities to return the hostages to Azerbaijan.

Baroness Anelay of St John’s, British Minister of State of the Foreign
and Commonwealth Office, recently said the British government didn’t
recognize the so-called “Nagorno-Karabakh Republic” and its “court”.

Meanwhile, Aurelia Grigoriu, a Moldovan ombudsman, expressed her
readiness to make her all-out efforts to raise awareness among the
European human rights defenders over the issue of Azerbaijani
hostages.

Armenia is still turning down the calls from the international
community to hand over the hostages to Azerbaijan.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan.

As a result of the ensuing war, in 1992 Armenian armed forces occupied
20 percent of Azerbaijan, including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and
seven surrounding districts.

The two countries signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The co-chairs
of the OSCE Minsk Group, Russia, France and the US are currently
holding peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented four UN Security Council resolutions
on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding regions.

Mothers of Dead Soldiers Disappointed by Defense Minister’s Speech o

Mothers of Dead Soldiers Disappointed by Defense Minister’s Speech on
Army Day – Video

01.30.2015 13:50 epress.am

The parents of soldiers who died during peacetime at various time
periods protested in front of the Opera on the 23rd anniversary of the
formation of the Armenian Army. Like always, they demanded that the
actual conditions and those guilty behind their children’s deaths be
discovered. They later entered the Opera building where a concert was
taking place dedicated to Army day. The parents entered not for the
concert but to hear Minister of Defense Seyran Ohanyan’s speech,
which, as per usual, disappointed them.

Epress.am spoke to Nana Muradyan, the mother of Valery Muradyan who
died in 2010, who noted that those soldiers who died in peacetime have
been entirely left out of the military leadership’s attention.

“They commemorate and bow down to those who were killed by a Turkish
bullet and forget those who were killed by the “internal Turk.” You
would think our children hadn’t gone to the army. They were soldiers,
good soldiers. That’s proven by the awards and incentives given to
them during their service. Those children were also protectors of our
motherland and were prepared to fight and die protecting this country,
but they didn’t let them do that, they killed them,” said Muradyan.

http://www.epress.am/en/2015/01/30/mothers-of-dead-soldiers-disappointed-by-defense-ministers-speech-on-army-day.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nERR3Zw7Tw

Azerbaijan hedges its bets amid Armenian tensions

Blouin News , NY
Jan 29 2015

Azerbaijan hedges its bets amid Armenian tensions

January 29, 2015 by Natalie Shure

Azerbaijani officials claimed Thursday to have shot down an Armenian
drone in their territory, Reuters reports. Although Armenia brushed
off the charge as “absurd,” the episode is the latest in a series of
escalating tensions between the uneasy neighbors of the South-Caucasus
region.

The two nations’ dispute centers on the autonomous region of
Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian-majority area inside Azerbaijan. Mutual
resentment between the two groups built up in the late-Ottoman era
partially due to Armenia’s disastrous relationship with Turkey, with
whom Azerbaijan shares close cultural ties. The conflict lay
relatively dormant under Soviet rule, until violence broke out in 1988
over control of Nagorno-Karabakh. The 1994 ceasefire left this a
relatively open question, prompting regional analyst Svante E. Cornell
to dub the territory “the mother of all unresolved conflicts” in the
post-Soviet world.

Since the Soviet collapse, Armenia has remained a staunch Russian
ally, while Azerbaijan has developed significant ties to the U.S. and
the E.U. Officials in the West consider Azerbaijani friendship
important in light of its many strategic advantages: it borders both
Russia and Iran, is rich in oil, and is a secular Muslim supporter of
Israel.

The contested Armenian drone tails over a year of nearby skirmishes
between the two states, leaving many observers puzzled about the root
cause of the increased unrest. There is plenty of evidence that the
hot button of Nagorno-Karabakh is being pressed for reasons that have
less to do with Armenia than they do with Azerbaijan’s ties to the
West. Throughout 2014, Azerbaijan’s dismal human rights record began
to attract international attention, including a New York Times op-ed
condemning the U.S. for ignoring the anti-democratic measures taken by
our ally. The Azerbaijani ambassador’s response to the piece sheds
light on what is perhaps the underlying motive for sounding the alarm
on Nagorno-Karabakh: human rights abuses of the Azerbaijani government
are not the problem, he argued, Armenian abuses are. In other words,
the heightened drama surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh could be a tool to
attract international support and deflect attention from the domestic
crackdown.

Despite its pro-Western strategy, Azerbaijan does seem to be hedging
its bets with Russia as well: many observers have argued this is
likely a self-preservation response to the conflict in Ukraine.
Because Russia has publicly attested its support for Armenia in the
Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, Baku appears to be stoking a preemptive
friendship. Russia has been supplying more military supplies to
Azerbaijan as of late, and the countries recently made a deal for a
railway running through Azerbaijani territory to connect Russia and
Iran. At the same time, Baku appears to be chilling relations with
Washington: in December, a government raid forcibly shut down
U.S.-backed RFERL’s Baku bureau, and jailed one of their journalists
focusing on corruption in Baku.

Wedged strategically and philosophically between the Russian and
Western spheres, it’s clear that Azerbaijan conceives Nagorno-Karabakh
in broad geopolitical terms. For now, it seems intent on forcing the
global community to see its domestic crackdown and dispute with
Armenia as completely separate issues. Given Baku’s tricky set of
interests, this hardly seems to be a savvy analysis.

http://blogs.blouinnews.com/blouinbeatworld/2015/01/29/azerbaijan-hedges-its-bets-amid-armenian-tensions/

BAKU: Musabekov: New War in Karabakh in Russia’s Interest

Turan Information Agency, Azerbaijan
January 29, 2015 Thursday

Musabekov: New War in Karabakh in Russia’s Interest

Baku / 29.01.15 / Turan: The tension of the last days in Karabakh and
on the border of Armenia and Azerbaijan are unlikely to go into
large-scale fighting. This opinion was expressed in an interview with
Turan by the political scientist, MP Rasim Musabekov, commenting on
the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh.

“The rise and fall of tension occurs periodically. In this sense,
nothing extraordinary happens. However, the number of victims has
increased. But I do not think that in the near future this will lead
to offensive operations using heavy equipment or the resumption of
war. At least, it is due to the fact that Armenia is preparing to hold
events to mark the “anniversary” of so-called “Armenian genocide” and
Baku is to hold the European Games,” said Musabekov.

But it is also clear that the war was only suspended, but not yet
completed. He also did not rule out that some distraught commander can
use heavy machinery, leading to bloody clashes.

Commenting on the recent statements by the OSCE Minsk Group, Musabekov
said: “These statements without principled assessment are designed to
ensure that the parties respect the ceasefire and negotiations are
continued. In fact, it is nothing but evasion of responsibility.”

There are four UN Security Council resolutions, and they must be met.
Within these resolutions they must respect the ceasefire and withdraw
the troops from the occupied territories, he said.

What is the way out, if negotiations do not work? In answering this
question, Musabekov said that if Armenia says it can make a
pre-emptive strike on Azerbaijan, then Baku also has every right to
strike such a blow on the occupation troops stationed on the territory
of Azerbaijan.

According to Musabekov, Azerbaijan just wants to restore its
territorial integrity. With regard to the question of who will benefit
from this, first of all, he did not rule out Russia’s interest in the
hostilities.

World prices of oil are falling, and Russia is suffering from this.
The oil market supply exceeds demand by about 1 million barrels. It is
just enough oil to enter the market through the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline.

If war breaks out and pumping oil and gas is disrupted, demand for
Russian hydrocarbons will increase.

On the other hand, it is possible that Russia will try to take
advantage of the war for the penetration in the region as an
interposition force.

“I believe that the leadership of Azerbaijan and the Western partners
are well aware of this. Azerbaijan does not intend to artificially
bring any force here as an interposition force. However, Azerbaijan
does not intend to cede its territory to anyone,” said Musabekov.

Why, then, do Azerbaijani officials criticize the United States and
the West and do not say anything against Russia?

Musabekov evaded a direct answer, saying that “they should first let
one million refugees return to their places and then lecture us.”

Azerbaijan asks no one for help and does not want anyone to teach it.
We have not violated our partnership with America. There is still
transit to Afghanistan and cooperation in large energy projects.
However, there are issues in which the current US administration shies
away from solutions and lectures us. Naturally, the answer is tough
enough,” said Musabekov. -06C-

France-Artsakh Friendship Circle supports OSCE Minsk Group’s charges

France-Artsakh Friendship Circle supports OSCE Minsk Group’s charges
against Azerbaijan

Friday, January 30, 13:23

The France-Artsakh Friendship Circle supports the OSCE Minsk Group’s
charges against Azerbaijan.

French Co-chair of the Circle, French Senator Francois Rochebloine
said that it was the first time that the OSCE MG co-chairs pointed out
Azerbaijan’s responsibility for tensions in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Rochebloine commends the co-chairs for their statement recognizing
Armenia’s reserved attitude and implying that Nagorno-Karabakh is also
a party to the peace talks.

The French Senator pointed out that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will
not be settled if no attention is paid to Nagorno-Karabakh’s
position. He said that the OSCE MG co-chairs’ statement contained an
indirect call for withdrawal of snipers from the contact line – a call
that is supported by Armenia but is rejected by Azerbaijan.

Rochebloine believes that the co-chairs are right when blaming Baku
for instability in the conflict zone. “By putting a sign of equality
between the one that attacks and the one who defends himself we will
not be able to settle the conflict. Here we need impartiality rather
than false parity equalizing Nagorno-Karabakh’s democracy with
Azerbaijan’s dictatorship,” Rochebloine said.

In their last statement the OSCE Minsk Group expressed their serious
concern about reported incursions across the Line of Contact and the
Armenia-Azerbaijan border, resulting in casualties.

“The rise in violence that began last year must stop for confidence to
be restored and progress to be made in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace
process. We called on Azerbaijan to observe its commitments to a
peaceful resolution of the conflict. We also call on Armenia to take
all measures to reduce tensions. All sides must abide by the terms of
the ceasefire agreement. Violence undermines efforts to bring about
peace,” the co-chairs said.

http://www.arminfo.am/index.cfm?objectid=12056260-A86A-11E4-806D0EB7C0D21663