Armenpress: Armenian FM, USAID Director discuss opportunities of implementing new joint programs

Armenian FM, USAID Director discuss opportunities of implementing new joint programs

Save

Share

 21:54, 2 May, 2022

YEREVAN, MAY 2, ARMENPRESS. On May 2, Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan, who is on a working visit in Washington, held a meeting with the Director of USAID Samantha Power, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia.

The interlocutors commended the consistent development of the Armenian-US relations based on common democratic values.

Ararat Mirzoyan emphasized USAID's support in the reform initiatives of the Government of Armenia in a number of spheres, particularly in the fight against corruption, judiciary and patrol police. Reference was also made to the innovative, sustainable development programs implemented by USAID in Armenia within the framework of Armenia-US cooperation aimed at promoting democratic development, economic growth, and strengthening energy security, as well as implementing reforms in the social spheres in the country.

The sides also discussed the perspectives of expanding the cooperation and implementing new joint programs.

During the meeting, Minister Mirzoyan presented to the interlocutor the humanitarian issues resulting from the 44-day war. In this context, the need for the repatriation of Armenian prisoners of war and civilians held by Azerbaijan was especially emphasized.

Oral history project collects tales from the Armenian diaspora using a converted food truck

April 28 2022

My Armenian Story, a program of the USC Dornsife Institute of Armenian Studies, encourages Armenians from Southern California and around the world to record their memories.

The Institute of Armenian Studies transformed an old food truck into a mobile recording studio to collect oral histories from Armenians in the Los Angeles area. (Photos: Mike Glier.)

In brief:

  • The USC Dornsife Institute of Armenian Studies is creating a repository for recorded interviews and narratives by Armenians around the world.
  • More than 100 oral histories have already been collected.
  • Interviewees have spoken on topics ranging from life in Ethiopia to religion to interracial dating.
  • For Armenian History Month, the institute drove a food truck converted into a mobile recording studio to various spots in Glendale and Los Angeles to interview community members.

When 97-year-old Marsbed Hablanian was a young man, he spent weeks hiding in a shelter in his hometown of Kiev, in what was then the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, trying to keep from being discovered by the Nazi forces attacking and bombing the city. Kiev (now Kyiv, Ukraine’s capital) ultimately fell, and Hablanian and many other Armenians were transported to Germany as forced labor. After the war, they lived at a displaced persons camp before coming to the United States.

Eighty years later, in a 2018 interview with staff of the Institute of Armenian Studies (IAS) at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, Hablanian recalled that horrific time, one having eerie parallels with the atrocities occurring during the current Russian invasion of his home country.

Hablanian’s tale is one of the first 100 oral histories collected by IAS for its My Armenian Story program, which gathers stories from Armenians around the world, of all ages, to preserve for future generations and for researchers.

People can either submit their story through the project’s website or tell it in person to one of the institute’s staff members.

For Armenian History Month in April, IAS transformed a former taco truck into a mobile recording studio, taking it around neighborhoods in Southern California and recording interviews with local residents.

“A lot of stories that come up in these interviews have never been shared before, so in a way, we become witnesses to these lives. And by recording it, preserving it and designating it as an archival collection, we become stewards of these stories, which, collectively, become a history of a people,” says IAS archivist Gegham Mughnetsyan. 

A converted food truck collects more stories

Mughnetsyan says that because the interviews come from people ages 18 to 97, they cover a wide swath of history and touch on subjects like interracial dating, social unrest, marriage, religion and old (and new) stereotypes about their communities.

IAS Associate Director Silva Sevlian explains that IAS originally started an oral history initiative in 2018, when staff started conducting filmed interviews with community leaders. Then in March 2020, the institute ramped up efforts to get wider participation by creating the My Armenian Story website, which gives users guidelines on how to film an interview and submit the recording from anywhere in the world.

To convince more people to participate, IAS staff contacted Vahe Karapetian, a food truck entrepreneur and IAS donor, about converting a truck into a mobile recording studio and bringing the idea and process of interviewing to the community.

Since April 1, the truck has been to Glendale Central Library, L.A. City Hall and other popular spots.

Silva Sevlian, right, interviews a member of L.A.’s Armenian community in the My Armenian Story truck.

Meanwhile, the My Armenian Story website has been garnering interest from people in other countries, Mughnetsyan says. Members of Armenian communities in Lebanon, France, Russia and even Armenia itself have expressed gratitude for the project guidelines and suggested questions. 

He notes that stories like Hablanian’s, regarding the invasion of Kyiv in World War II, are important as both testimonials of the past and cautionary tales.

“What Hablanian witnessed, I thought, was from a bygone era, but now I am witnessing the same thing with Russia on live television. So, in a way, these oral histories have influenced my outlook on the world and how I perceive events happening around me, with the eye of somebody who should look at things and remember them for the sake of documenting them, for the sake of being witness to history,” he says.

PM Pashinyan announces launch of construction of Ajapnyak station of Yerevan Metro

Save

Share

 13:21,

YEREVAN, APRIL 28, ARMENPRESS. A winner has been named in the tender announced for the construction of the Ajapnyak statin of Yerevan Metro.

During the Cabinet meeting today, Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan said the issue and possibility of constructing the Ajapnyak station has long been discussed.

“We have started the practical stage. A tender was announced for the designing of the station. There is a winner based on the tender results, and today the issue of funding will be discussed so that the designer will already make the design of the Ajapnyak station, which means that we are entering the construction stage”, the PM said.

He said that 750 million drams from the 850 million dram compensation paid for the damage caused by the Parking City Service to the Yerevan community will be directed for the designing works of the station.

Mayor of Yerevan Hrachya Sargsyan said that the project will be implemented in 510 days or maybe earlier, within 50 million dollars.

“The project will be in three phases. We will be able to finance the first two phases at the expense of these funds. At the same time, I would like to ask for your instruction so that we can work for searching for financial resources necessary for the third stage from now on”, he said.

PM Pashinyan said this is a strategic project because it means that the metro crosses the opposite bank of River Hrazdan, which means that there is an opportunity for further branching to Davtashen, Malatia-Sebastia, 15th district, etc.

President Biden Recognized a Genocide, Only to Allow Another One to Continue | Opinion

Newsweek

​Statement by President Joe Biden on Armenian Remembrance Day

BRIEFING ROOM

Statement by President Joe Biden on Armenian Remembrance Day

APRIL 24, 2022•STATEMENTS AND RELEASES

On April 24, 1915, Ottoman authorities arrested Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople. Thus began the Armenian genocide—one of the worst mass atrocities of the 20th century. Today, we remember the one and a half million Armenians who were deported, massacred, or marched to their deaths in a campaign of extermination, and mourn the tragic loss of so many lives.

As we reflect on the Armenian genocide, we renew our pledge to remain vigilant against the corrosive influence of hate in all its forms. We recommit ourselves to speaking out and stopping atrocities that leave lasting scars on the world. And, as we mourn what was lost during the Meds Yeghern, let us redouble our efforts toward healing and building the better, more peaceful world that we wish for our children. A world where human rights are respected, where the evils of bigotry and intolerance do not mark our daily lives, and where people everywhere are free to pursue their lives in dignity and security.

This is also a moment to reflect on the strength and resiliency of the Armenian people. After enduring a genocide, the Armenian people were determined to rebuild their community and their culture, so often in new homes and new lands, including the United States. Armenian Americans are a vital part of the fabric of the United States. They make our nation stronger and more dynamic, even as they continue to carry with them the tragic knowledge of what their ancestors endured. We recognize their pain and honor their story.

Today, 107 years later, the American people continue to honor all Armenians who perished in the genocide.

AW: Who speaks for the people of Artsakh?

March dedicated to the 33rd anniversary of Artsakh Revival Day held in Stepanakert, February 20, 2021

With the Armenian political landscape currently dominated with the “normalization” dialogue with Turkey and the “peace” negotiations with Azerbaijan, the lines of communication and representation have become controversial. Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) was legally considered an autonomous oblast (region) within Azerbaijan. The latter abused this relationship with decades of discrimination and economic deprivation. When they were unilaterally attacked in 1991, the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh succeeded in securing their freedom from the oppressive Azerbaijani regime. Most Armenians have a vague recollection that, despite their status as an unrecognized republic (some refer to it as a “breakaway” but how can you break away from something that you were never a part of), Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR), until the late 1990s, was a direct party in the post-war negotiations with Azerbaijan and Armenia. Beginning in 1998, as the wounds of the war diminished, Azerbaijan hardened its position and refused to recognize NKR as a party in the peace talks. The leadership dynamics also changed in Armenia as Robert Kocharyan, a native of Karabakh and veteran of the liberation war, became the second President of Armenia. He was followed in 2008 by Serzh Sargsyan who was also raised in Karabakh. Starting with Kocharyan, Armenia backed away from the direct participation of NKR in the conflict. This decision was obviously influenced by the birthplace of the president and his close ties to the people of Artsakh. It also began a period of tension between some political leaders from Armenia and the Karabakhtsis. The ugly head of disunity began to emerge. Regardless of the causes, Armenia from this time had assumed full responsibility for the security and representation of NKR in the negotiations process. Many Armenians considered this a political error because the Artsakh situation would be subject to the interests and pressures of Armenia proper. This is particularly evident today as Armenia is no longer led by individuals with strong emotional ties to Artsakh. There have been ominous rumors and public statements from the government about compromise and capitulations. The rhetoric of the government denies this, but fear of surrender is present in the general population.

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan recently said, “For us, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is not a territorial dispute, but a matter of rights.” I would venture to say that a few people would disagree with that statement, including the people in Artsakh whose future he is discussing. It seems clear that these alleged concessions are intended to gain Azerbaijani agreement for some “guarantees of rights and freedom.” This is how a defeated nation acts. We are appealing to the murderers and thieves to respect our rights, and we will forgo with this idea of the last 30 years that this is Armenian land. Based on the public statements of the government, it is difficult to draw any other conclusion. In his recent address to the Parliament, Pashinyan did nothing to dispel this mentality. Apparently, the leaders of Armenia have decided to sacrifice Artsakh in order to “save” Armenia.” In contrast to a time when we fought against overwhelming odds, the vision of the last 30-plus years, at a cost of thousands of lives, will be discarded. I weep for our heroes in Artsakh.

In recent days, there has predictably been an increase in public opposition to this approach. Public rallies and opposition statements from prominent Armenians are speaking up against the predicted capitulation. It raises the question: “Who speaks for the people of Artsakh?” Is it possible that the current environment has created a conflict of interests whereby the interests of the people of Artsakh are not aligned with Armenia? If so, how can the people of Artsakh have their voice heard in this process? Normally one would never question Armenians representing Armenians, but these are very different times. The Pashinyan government is inexperienced. It presided over a disastrous war and now operates as a defeated nation. The animosity between the former presidents from Karabakh and the Pashinyan government remains high. I doubt there can be respect between Pashinyan and Kocharyan after the former’s failed attempt to prosecute the latter. The current government has consolidated its power by controlling the Parliament and the replacement of Armen Sarkissian as President. Yet, instead of working to unite the country at a time of great external peril, we are divided. Armenia has operated for years as the guarantor of Artsakh security. There were never foreign troops on the soil of the Artsakh until late 2020 when the Russian peacekeepers entered the picture. This was a monumental change and reduced Armenia’s position as the security partner to a subordinated position. Border incursions have occurred regularly by the Azerbaijani criminals. Armenia fails to respond, and instead defers to the Russian presence. Azerbaijan violates the tripartite agreement on a daily basis, yet Armenia fails to respond to the needs of our brethren in Artsakh. How can Armenia represent the interests of the Armenians there when they have removed themselves as the security guarantor and are operating as a subordinated player? This summer, many of Armenia’s contract soldiers will be rotating out. Will they be replaced? Will the Artsakh Defense Army be forced to disband with Armenia’s consent?

This question of advocating for Artsakh is not a legal matter. We have managed to box ourselves into a corner. Artsakh remains an unrecognized republic and as such has no formal diplomatic relations with other countries. So, it is easy to dismiss them as a party in the negotiations. It became far more difficult for the Armenians of Artsakh when even Armenia, the protector for 30 years, failed to recognize the Republic of Artsakh. Even in the darkest days of Azeri oppression, Armenia balked for fear that it would ignite war with Azerbaijan. Apparently, it didn’t prevent the 2016 attacks and the barbaric 2020 war, including the thousands of border violations. The overly cautious approach by Armenia, behaving like a vassal state of Russia and fearful of being perceived as an aggressor, has cost the Armenians dearly. In contrast to the “nice guy” approach, the Azeris have ignored all agreements, continued aggressive policies of intimidation and violated international law countless times. So much for following the rules and seeking fair play. This is a matter of conscience among Armenians. When Armenia assumed the responsibility for Artsakh’s security, that obligation carried with it to work in their best interests. Many of us have met the people of Artsakh. They are strong, courageous and committed to their rights. Capitulating is not something in their vocabulary. Those of us in the western diaspora have witnessed, read or seen hundreds of examples of their valor and determination during the endless border disputes and incursions. Have we ever heard comments about giving up on their dreams or relinquishing their freedom? After the devastating war in late 2020, during which the refugee situation was catastrophic, thousands returned within a few months. As a result of Azeri barbarism, many returned to nothing except the beloved land they are eternally committed to. Can there be any clearer _expression_ of their desire to live free in Artsakh? Yet, here we are talking about “lowering the bar” and abandoning their future. There seems to be a large gap in the desire of the people of Artsakh and those representing their interests at the negotiating table.

The Armenian government has diluted its position with wording shifting towards “security and rights” verses “freedom and sovereignty.” A question that Armenia must consider during this process is what type of future will the Armenians in Artsakh have under any type of Azerbaijani administration? Undoubtedly, it is a death sentence that will be filled with discrimination, population dilution and cultural genocide. In 20 years, the Armenians of Artsakh will have gone the way of our people in Nakhichevan through no fault of their own. There is no evidence or history to suggest anything but another calamity. Knowing this, why would the Armenian government advocate for a deadly compromise? It is unconscionable. We have heard that resisting would be a disaster. The only thing worse than these difficult odds is agreeing to the humiliation of a plan that will ensure your eventual destruction. A great deal has been written speculating that Pashinyan may already have agreed to a “peace” agreement or that the pressure to surrender Artsakh is too great. What if he refused to sacrifice Artsakh? In practical terms, what would happen? Would Russia shut off the gas supply or would Azerbaijan sabotage the lines? The Armenians have been there and would not be intimidated. What if Aliyev decided to attack? That would be interesting given the border presence of Russian troops and their commitment for a five-year presence. What would the European reaction be given the Council of Europe mediation and the OSCE Minsk Group? They haven’t been very helpful, but this could push their buttons. It is not our right to speak for the people of Artsakh given the options available, but they would rather resist than accept a slow death under Azerbaijan. A Russian protectorate status is reminiscent of the “autonomous oblast” past unless it is absorbed into the Russian Federation. History would repeat itself. In 1920, Armenia became a Soviet entity to prevent a further slaughter by the Turks and virtual extinction. Is this an option that Pashinyan will represent? Will Russia be able to convince the criminal Aliyev to accept this compromise?

The future is unclear, but Artsakh must have an advocate to prevent its demise. The Armenians have too many examples in our history of areas subjected to forced expulsion, massacre and economic discrimination. The list is long with Western Armenia, Cilicia, Nakhichevan and the current atrocities in occupied sections of Artsakh. We don’t need another territory lost that becomes an additional demand of territorial return. The price has been too high already. It would be a stain to abandon those heroic people and an insult to the memory of those sacrificed. I realize that words such as “abandon,” “insult” or “responsibility” have little value in the vicious world of geopolitical conflict, but Pashinyan has one last chance to stand with the people of Artsakh and demand a viable future for our brethren.

Columnist
Stepan was raised in the Armenian community of Indian Orchard, MA at the St. Gregory Parish. A former member of the AYF Central Executive and the Eastern Prelacy Executive Council, he also served many years as a delegate to the Eastern Diocesan Assembly. Currently , he serves as a member of the board and executive committee of the National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR). He also serves on the board of the Armenian Heritage Foundation. Stepan is a retired executive in the computer storage industry and resides in the Boston area with his wife Susan. He has spent many years as a volunteer teacher of Armenian history and contemporary issues to the young generation and adults at schools, camps and churches. His interests include the Armenian diaspora, Armenia, sports and reading.


Igor Khovaev will visit Azerbaijan in the near future. Zakharova

Save

Share

 19:45,

YEREVAN, APRIL 20, ARMENPRESS. Special envoy of the Russian Foreign Minister for the normalization of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan Igor Khovaev has held consultations in Yerevan, and his visit to Baku has is arranged, ARMENPRESS reports the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova said at a briefing with journalists.

"One of the main tasks of Igor Khovaev is to assist the Azerbaijani and Armenian partners in the preparation of the peace treaty. The Special Representative is already actively involved in the work, has held useful consultations in Yerevan. His visit to Baku has been arranged in the near future," Zakharova said.

He stressed that the basis of the dialogue is the basic principles proposed by Baku for the establishment of interstate relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia, as well as Yerevan's constructive response to those proposals.

AMAA Vanadzor ‘Shogh’ Center Named in Honor of Sarkis and Haygouhie Marandjian

Harout Nercessian with Shogh Center's youth

The Armenian Missionary Association of America’s “Shogh” Center in Vanadzor was recently named in honor of benefactors Sarkis and Haygouhie Marandjian.

AMAA Armenia held a plaque unveiling ceremony in honor of benefactors Sarkis and Haygouhie Marandjian, residents of Toronto, Canada. The Marandjian’s are members and benefactors of the Armenian Missionary Association of Canada, where Sarkis is also a Board member.

The new plaque was unveiled on March 30 at the AMAA Vanadzor Shogh Day Center.

AMAA Armenia representative Harout Nercessian greeted the staff, guests, parents, and children who were in attendance, and expressed his gratitude to the Marandjians, thanks to whose generosity many children will receive life-impacting educational, social, and psychological services.

The children performed a flash mob dance with colored ribbons, which represented the bright colors brought into their lives thanks to the Center: friendship, responsibility, honesty, and other noble human qualities.

Vanadzor “Shogh” Center Coordinator Irina Chakhoyan, as well as the participating children and parents, voiced their profound gratitude to the benefactors for the incredible, positive impact the Marandjian “Shogh” Center has on the lives of the children.

The event participants painted the seemingly blank canvas with brushstrokes, which unveiled into the sketch portrait of the Marandjians.

Armenia political analyst: West is interested in what situation can be created here to force Russia to leave region

NEWS.am
Armenia – April 9 2022

Brussels is not the platform where the Armenian-Azerbaijani and Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh)-Azerbaijani issues will be resolved in the current situation. Political analyst Argishti Kiviryan stated about this in the TALK TIME program of Armenian News-NEWS.am, commenting on Wednesday’s meeting in Brussels between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev—and mediated by European Council President Charles Michel.

"This region is still in the Russian ‘zone,’ Russian peacekeepers are deployed in Artsakh, Russian soldiers are standing at a number of sectors of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. At the moment, all those who stand on the border are the 'godfathers,' to put it harshly, of this case.

But what is the interest of Brussels, Western circles? On the one hand, this is an attempt to prove that they exist. On the other hand, to develop the situation and check what opportunities there are, as they—either Brussels or the West—are not globally interested in the Artsakh or the Armenian-Azerbaijani issues. They are interested in what situation can be created here to force Russia to leave the region," Kiviryan said.

According to him, this situation has worsened ever since the current Ukrainian war.

"We see that this is the objective of the West. Their main objective here is to 'poison' the lives of the Russians here," the analyst said.

Russia accuses Azerbaijan of breaching ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh

March 28 2022

Azerbaijan says it has taken control of the village of Farrukh.
By bne IntelliNews March 28, 2022

Relations between Russia and Azerbaijan reached a new low after the Russian Ministry of Defence accused Azerbaijan of breaching the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh ceasefire agreement. Russia said on 27 May that it was deeply concerned about the rise in tensions in Nagorno-Karabakh and called for calm after what it said were breaches of the 2020 ceasefire brokered by Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Russia accused Azerbaijan of violation of the agreement by allowing its forces to enter a zone policed by Russian peacekeepers near the village of Farrukh and added that Azerbaijan had by 28 March withdrawn the soldiers. This was rejected by the Azerbaijani Ministry of Defence. The Azerbaijan statement said they haven't withdrawn the soldiers and the strategic height had been captured.

The Azerbaijani MoD also accused Russian counterparts of not acting in the spirit of the Declaration on Allied Interaction signed by the presidents of the two countries on February 22, 2022. Azeri side even said that according to Article 18 of the Declaration, Russia should join Azerbaijan in their "efforts to combat and neutralise the threats of international terrorism, extremism, and separatism".

Governing party authorities, such as MP Javid Osmanov also defended the position that the village was now under the control of Azerbaijan: "Under the leadership of President Ilham Aliyev, the Azerbaijani army is currently strengthening its position by redeploying. Thus, the village of Farrukh, one of our historical lands, has also come under the control of Azerbaijan. Through successful diplomatic and political means, the village of Farrukh has already come under the full control of Azerbaijan."

Other co-chairs of Minsk Group – US and France – also released similar statements on the breach of the ceasefire by Azerbaijan, however they were not given a response by the Azerbaijani authorities.

This exchange of diplomatic statements comes after Armenia's accusation thatAzerbaijan had breached the ceasefire agreement by seizing new territories in Karabakh on 24 March.