Russia’s Twisted Victory Over Turkey in a Proxy War Involving Azerbaijan and Armenia

International Policy Digest
Feb 4 2021
“Western ignorance of the region and tendencies to view developments in Azerbaijan solely through simplistic, liberal democratic lenses risks accelerating the growth of this influence and encouraging interest groups in the ruling elite to advocate closer alignment with Moscow,” opined Zaur Shiriyev, Crisis Group’s Analyst for the South Caucasus.

The issue is only complicated if one reads about centuries of endless battles between Azerbaijan and Armenia giving rise to a frozen conflict. The conflict centered on the Armenian-majority Azerbaijani enclave known as Nagorno-Karabakh, and the nearby Southern Caucasus.

Augmenting the critical territorial issues, are fundamental cultural, language, and ethnic differences.

Ultimately the regional conflict evolved into a proxy war between Russia and Turkey.

Turkish President Tayyip Recep Erdoğan’s objective was to use this conflict as leverage for membership in the Minsk Group. The Minsk Group spearheads the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s (OSCE) efforts to find a peaceful solution to the frozen Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and shares influence in the South Caucasus. The Minsk Group consists of France, Russia, and the United States. If successful, Erdoğan would assume a greater role in regional geopolitics.

Russian President Vladimir Putin had his own agenda: increasing Russia’s military presence on its Southern Caucasus borders.

The Caucuses Natural Border

Russia proactively protects the natural border and buffer zone created by the Southern Caucuses. 90% of the Georgian-Azerbaijani and Russian-Azerbaijani borders run along the Caucasian Mountain ridge thereby creating a natural barrier separating Russia from Turkey, Iran, Syria, and Libya. It prevents terrorists and returning Chechnyan fighters from Syria from entering Russia. Russia has historically cooperated with Georgian, Azerbaijani, and Armenian troops to patrol this region.

Russia is also concerned that the limited Iranian border between Azerbaijan and Turkey remains open. Under Erdoğan’s leadership, Turkey has drifted away from democratic principles into a more traditional Shiite Muslim nation, promoting increasingly radical Muslim ideals. Since the early days of the civil war in Syria, Turkey has allowed terrorists and mercenaries to traverse freely between Europe and Syria.

Russia and Turkey’s Rapidly Evolving Relations with Azerbaijan and Armenia

Azerbaijan’s land borders are extensive, and it shares maritime borders with Iran, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, and Russia via the resource-rich Caspian Sea.

Smaller and landlocked Armenia is surrounded in the north by Georgia, Azerbaijan, and the Southern Caucasus. Its southeast and western neighbours are, respectively, Iran and Turkey.

Azerbaijan and Turkey

Turkey and Azerbaijani are both Turkic countries. The 140 million Turkic people living in several countries share a common language and ethnic heritage but not religion. For instance, Turks are predominantly Sunni and Azerbaijani’s Shia.

Russian soldiers patrolling Nagorno-Karabakh.

After the Second World War, Turkey was the first country to diplomatically and economically engage with Azerbaijan. In 2012, their presidents issued a joint statement calling them “one nation, with two states.”

While Russia is Turkey’s largest energy and military source, Azerbaijan has gas and oil reserves, especially in the Caspian Sea. Its capital, Baku, has the largest Caspian seaport.

Azerbaijan and Russia

A former USSR satellite state, Azerbaijan has maintained close ties with Russia. Azerbaijan protects its Shia and Russian Orthodox population, granting citizens of Russian descent equal rights and the right to enjoy their culture and traditions.

While it closed in 2012, the Russian Gabala Radar Station existed in Azerbaijan. It was an early warning system for missile attacks on Russia’s southern periphery, as well as the other Caucuses states.

Russia attempted to maintain the status quo by offering to train Azerbaijan’s troops and to teach them how to repair military equipment in Russia. Azerbaijan, which has always felt threatened by Russia’s Armenian relationship, rejected the offer, stating that after the USSR’s dissolution, the Gabala Radar Installation became its sovereign property.

Azerbaijan then approached NATO about training its military. While not a NATO member, since 1991, Azerbaijan has belonged to the North Atlantic Cooperation Council. NATO offered to have neighboring Turkey assist in training Azerbaijan‘s military personnel.

A related concern for Russia is Azerbaijan and Armenia’s Iranian borders. Although Azerbaijan and Iran are both predominantly Shia, and their religious ideologies are world’s apart, and together with Turkey, they share strong economic ties.

For Russia, expanding access to ports to transport oil and weapons, and to engage in military operations has been a priority. Azerbaijan offers Russia access to three major ports. Azerbaijan transports its energy resources via the Russian pipeline to Novorossiysk.

Armenia and Turkey

Turkey and Armenia have a fraught history. Armenia still harbors resentment for the Armenian genocide when up to 1.5 million Armenians were killed.

In 2008, Ankara unsuccessfully pursued diplomatic efforts with Armenia. The failure motivated Turkey to pour military resources into Azerbaijan.

Armenia and Russia

Since the days of the Soviet Union, Moscow has provided Armenia with military support, and maintained a military base in Armenia. Since 2000, Russia’s military presence has increased.

(Al Jazeera)

In 1997, Armenia and Russia signed a friendship treaty calling for mutual assistance in the event of a military threat to either party and allowed Russia’s military to patrol Armenia’s Turkish and Iranian borders.

Russia is always interested in exploring other countries’ natural resources. In Armenia, there is a long list of valuable natural resources found in its mountainous region, including gold, iron, silver, copper, molybdenum, zinc, lead, aluminum, and other precious metals.

The Disputed Nagorno-Karabakh

The dispute between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh is centuries old; with both countries believing they have a legitimate claim to the territory.

Until 1989, Nagorno-Karabakh was part of the USSR; during which time Armenia and Azerbaijan unhappily coexisted. After dissolution, Nagorno-Karabakh was internationally accepted as belonging to Azerbaijan, without Armenia relinquishing its claim.

Nagorno-Karabakh has existed as a semiautonomous de facto state despite international recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh as Azerbaijan’s. Devoid of an economy or border controls, it is beleaguered by drugs and human trafficking.

Until this proxy war, Nagorno-Karabakh consisted of 10 regions; 70% Armenian controlled and 30% Azerbaijani.

More Recent History

Having long wanted an official say in the Southern Caucuses, as early as 2008, Turkey unsuccessfully proposed a Caucasus Stability and Cooperation Pact, that would have included Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Turkey, and Russia.

In 2018, the European Parliament’s peace program offered “…full support to the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and to the United Nations in their efforts to solve the regional frozen conflicts; to commit the European Union to act as a mediator in the search for peaceful solutions.”

Related to the current conflict is Russia’s Dagestan border situated at its southern-most point. It abuts Georgia and Azerbaijan. Russia’s stronghold was unsuccessfully challenged in 1999 by the Chechnya-based Islamic International Peacekeeping Brigade, in the War of Dagestan in August of 1999.

Azerbaijan claimed that the fighting was a security threat.

After the War of Dagestan, in October 2000, Russia transferred weapons from Georgia to its Armenian military near Nagorno-Karabakh.

Russian officials denied transferring weapons to the Armenian military, countering that the weapons in Armenia were under Russian control at a Russian military base located in Gyumri, a city in northeast Armenia.

Between 2012-14 Azerbaijan amassed approximately $12 billion in armaments primarily from Turkey. This led to a significant military relationship developing between Azerbaijan and Turkey.

Azerbaijan and Israel share a common enemy in Iran. As early as 2016, Israel sold Azerbaijan $7 billion in weapons. The sales included drones and Israel’s Iron Dome anti-missile and rocket system. Mossad gained an Azerbaijan station for monitoring Iran and was allowed the use of Azerbaijan’s airfields. Israeli fighter jets have been observed in Azerbaijan.

In 2020, unconfirmed Azerbaijani sources alleged Russia transferred to Armenia an additional 20 tanks, 60 infantry cars, 25 armored vehicles, 25 Shilka’s, which is a radar-guided anti-aircraft weapon system, 250 antitank launchers, 250 submachine guns, and 25 other military vehicles. The allegations did not address if the armaments were delivered to Russia’s military base or to the Armenian military.

Azerbaijan’s Minister of Defense General Abiyev responded that the “Russian-Armenian military cooperation became a real jeopardy for the entire Caucasus.”

At the same time, Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev claimed that “There are 5,000 Russian troops at the base in Gyumri and according to the information we have, the base maintains regular arms supply to Armenian armed forces.”

Russia’s weapons sat like a festering wound, but until 2020, Azerbaijan lacked the military prowess to challenge Russia.

Turkey’s Responsibility for Starting the Proxy War

This opened the door for Turkey to expand its role in the region. Turkey pledged to Azerbaijan unconditional military support.

Turkey provided military leadership and personnel, along with armaments to Azerbaijan’s military. This included the sale of two dozen armed Turkish drones to Azerbaijan. While the drones have a limited range of 150 km, they can hover for up to 24 hours.

Over 600 Turkish troops were sent to Azerbaijan. Turkey also deployed a special forces regiment specialized in mountain warfare to help Azerbaijan fight in mountainous terrain.

Azerbaijan now had military superiority over Armenia. With Turkey’s military prowess behind it, Azerbaijan implemented tighter security measures along the Dagestan border and invaded Nagorno-Karabakh.

In July 2020, Azerbaijan initiated combat north of Nagorno-Karabakh and in close proximity to Russian gas pipelines.

This was the beginning of a proxy war.

It became a full-blown conflict on September 27th when Armenia attacked several Azerbaijani civilians and troops.

Russia and France claimed that Turkey used its Libyan strategy by deploying Syrian mercenaries to take control of Nagorno-Karabakh.

The war quickly shifted in Azerbaijan’s favor due to the drones acquired from Turkey, which were “…responsible for the destruction of hundreds of armoured vehicles and even air defence systems,” according to UK Defense Minister Ben Wallace.

Unverified video evidence suggested the drones also killed civilians.

Chris Coles, director of Drone Wars UK, a reliable source opined that “Civil society groups have been warning for some time that because drones lower the cost of warfare, they are likely to fuel this type of bitter, lethal conflict between neighbouring states.”

In response, in October, Canada suspended exports to Turkey of targeting gear made in Ontario after they were found in a downed Turkish drone.

Violating an international ban, on October 28, Armenian forces either fired or supplied cluster munitions and at least one type of long-range rocket used in an attack on Barda city, several hundred miles west of Baku.

The OSCE’s Minsk Group brokered an October 2020 peace settlement.

Concurrently, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that “This conflict did not begin as a conflict just between two governments over a territory, it began with inter-ethnic confrontations. Sadly, this is a fact, when first in Sumgait and then in Nagorno-Karabakh brutal crimes were committed against the Armenian people.”

That agreement rapidly deteriorated perhaps in part as Turkey was not a party. Over 5,000 troops and civilians were killed.

On November 9, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov brokered a second ceasefire.

Armenia sustained several territorial losses. The three Armenian controlled districts in Nagorno-Karabakh went to Azerbaijan. Over 7,000 Armenians occupying Nagorno-Karabakh were to return to Armenia. In a minor concession, the agreement left Stepanakert, the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh, under Armenian control.

Armenia agreed to open a transport corridor for Azerbaijan through Armenia to the Azerbaijani region of Nakhichevan. Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that “the main thing is to prevent bloodshed.”

The November 2020 peace agreement included a memorandum of understanding signed by Turkey and Russia to jointly monitor the peace deal, which can be renewed every five years.

Afterward, 135 Turkish Armed Forces Special Mine Detection and Clearance specialists have supported Azerbaijan troops to disarm and dispose of unexploded ordnance in Nagorno-Karabakh liberated from Armenia’s occupation and outside of Baku.

The November peace agreement did not address Nagorno-Karabakh’s legal and political status.

Armenian’s have protested the agreement. Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan defended the deal as a painful but necessary move to prevent further territorial losses.

Dmitri Trenin, a political analyst for the Moscow Carnegie Center, said that the “…peacekeeping function is Moscow’s advantage in its competitive relationship with Ankara.”

At least 2,000 Russian troops will guard the “Lachin corridor” linking the Karabakh capital, Stepanakert, to Armenia. Russia sent 5,000 peacekeeping troops just north of the Iranian border. Ninety armoured personnel carriers were simultaneously deployed.

Now having some oversight responsibilities, “Under President Erdoğan, Turkey has gained a very important foothold in the region,” concluded Deutsche Welle political commentator Konstantin von Eggert.

Both sides have been accused of violating the cease-fire agreement by engaging in isolated skirmishes.

On December 13, the situation escalated after the Armenian army violated the cease-fire, precipitating Azerbaijan’s military seizing territory in the Armenian Caucasus as Armenians torched their homes before fleeing.

In late December, the UK’s military implemented a state of the art armed drone program to counter Azerbaijan’s controversial and indiscriminate use of drones. The UK did not comment on suspending two other British drone components, a fuel pump and a bomb rack missile release system sold to Turkey’s military despite a 1992 arms embargo relating to all weapons that could be used in Nagorno-Karabakh.

At the December agreement’s inception, Lavrov unequivocally stated that “…attempts to question this agreement both domestically and internationally are unacceptable.”

This position underscored a January 13 summit hosted by the Kremlin with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, with Turkey notably absent, to discuss further implementation of the November truce, including the role of regional Russian peacekeepers, demarcation lines, and humanitarian issues. The meeting was permeated by deep-seated distrust and hatred.

The future of other Turkic countries is uncertain as Turkey may consider proxy war the necessary impetus for advancing into other post-Soviet Turkic countries, such as Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.

 

Armenian community head: Borders are being specified with use of GPS every day

Panorama, Armenia
Feb 6 2021

The demarcation of borders between Armenia and Azerbaijan near Khndzoresk community of Armenia’s Syunik Province has not yet been completed, its head, Yervand Malunts, told Panorama.am on Saturday, referring to reports alleging the Armenian side retreated further from the border area.

The community head said every day the borders are being specified with the use of GPS, and Armenians withdraw from the areas which are marked as Azerbaijani by the positioning system.

Asked whether the Armenian side has made concessions recently, Yervand Malunts gave a negative response.

“Now the enemy forces are stationed only several hundred meters away from us on the left and are at a distance of 5 km on the right. The demarcation and delimitation process is yet to be completed in order to understand whether a new problem will emerge or not. What other major problems and losses can we possibly talk about after handing over 150 km of our liberated lands to them?” Malunts said.

EBRD, UNDP pioneer social impact bond working with smallholder farmers in Armenia

BNE Intellinews
Feb 5 2021
AddThis Sharing Buttons

By bne IntelIiNews February 5, 2021

A social impact bond pilot programme announced on February 4 by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) aims to improve the lives of smallholder farmers in the Shirak region of north-western Armenia.

The two institutions signed a letter of intent to structure a social impact bond, a financing tool that links financial success to the delivery of measured social outcomes.

Social bonds provide investment to address social problems by funding preventive measures. When the social outcomes improve, investors are repaid their initial investment plus a return for the financial risk that they took.

The social impact bond will be the first introduced in Armenia and it will be dedicated to supporting the development of the local agribusiness sector, the EBRD said. The Slovak Republic is providing financial support for the services of Social Finance, a consultancy, to build on the findings of a feasibility study prepared by the UNDP.

Dimitri Gvindadze, EBRD head of Armenia, said: “The EBRD and UNDP share the common objective of promoting the development of agribusiness in Armenia and making the economy more inclusive. Today we are formalising our partnership and leveraging our strengths to attract private-sector investment and activities. Supporting inclusive and sustainable development is one of our priorities in Armenia.”

Dmitry Mariyasin, UNDP resident representative in Armenia, said: “UNDP supports sustainable development in Armenia. The country is to be a pioneer in the use of new innovative financial mechanisms, such as social impact bonds, for unlocking private and public capital for national development priorities, including agriculture. We are delighted to be part of this process.”

The EBRD is the leading institutional investor in Armenia, active in all sectors of the economy. Since the start of its operations in the country in 1992, the development bank has invested €1.47bn in 187 projects there, in the financial, corporate, infrastructure and energy sectors, with 91% of those investments in the private sector.

UNDP is the leading United Nations organisation fighting to end the injustice of poverty, inequality and climate change. UNDP in Armenia was established in March 1993 and supports the government in meeting its development priorities and the sustainable development goals. 

Armenpress: Standing Rapporteurs on Armenia, Azerbaijan call on Azerbaijan to return Armenian POWs

Standing Rapporteurs on Armenia, Azerbaijan call on Azerbaijan to retuen Armenian POWs

Save

Share

 20:58, 2 February, 2021

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 2, ARMENPRESS. Member of the European Parliament, Head of the Delegation for the South Caucasus Marina Kaljurand, the European Parliament's Standing Rapporteur on Armenia, MEP Andrey Kovatchev and the European Parliament's Standing Rapporteur on Azerbaijan, MEP Željana Zovko issued a joint statement, emphasizing the necessity of resuming negotiations on Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement.

՛՛ Last year’s war between Armenia and Azerbaijan was a terrible
human tragedy,

We applaud the fact that the situation has stabilized after the agreement of 9 November 2020 and that – apart from deplorable but isolated incidents – the ceasefire has been respected, but a lot more is necessary to achieve much-needed reconciliation.

Negotiations on a lasting settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and on the region’s future legal status remain as indispensable as ever. We call on both parties to reaffirm clearly and publicly their willingness to re-engage in the process led by the Minsk Group Co-Chairs and founded on the group’s Basic Principles that they themselves agreed to, reflecting the Helsinki Final Act principles of non-use of force, territorial integrity, and the equal rights and self-determination of peoples. At a time of a fresh momentum brought about by the new US administration, we firmly reiterate the European Parliament’s – and, indeed, the European Union’s – continued support to this process and these principles.

The complete implementation of the ceasefire agreement is a necessary first step and it is regrettable that the exchange of prisoners of war has not been carried out fully yet. We welcome last week’s release of several of the Armenian servicemen captured after the end of hostilities and appeal to Azerbaijan to release the rest, so that trust can be rebuilt.

We also urge the parties to ensure fully unhindered access of international organizations for the purposes of humanitarian assistance and the protection of cultural heritage. These issues underline even
more the need for renewed multilateral efforts to support finding a lasting solution to the conflict՛՛, reads the statement.

Suren Sargsyan: If you think better life will come with Artsakh’s surrender, you are gravely mistaken

Panorama, Armenia
Feb 2 2021

Political scientist Suren Sargsyan has shared the photo of PM Nikol Pashinyan on Facebook, along with a message, which reads:

"I think this person has always believed that Armenia has no future as long as it has the Karabakh issue. He believes that the only solution to Artsakh issue is to cede it to Azerbaijan. He thinks as long as we have Artsakh, we have problems. He believes that if there is no Karabakh issue, peace will be established in the region, the Armenian-Turkish and Armenian-Azerbaijani border will open, and we will turn into Switzerland. He seriously believes in all these," Sargsyan wrote, adding:

"Pashinyan, however, lacks the understanding that

1. The Artsakh issue is not resolved
2. it is an hollow idea to assume peace will come with Armenia's defeat, likewise it didn't come with Azerbaijan's defeat,
3. it is an hollow idea that the region will prosper,
4. the complex regional situation is not conditioned only by the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict,
5. it is conditioned by Russian-Turkish, US/Israel – Iran counteractions, complicated relations between Georgia and Russia, etc.
6. the Armenian-Turkish rapprochement or the settlement of the relations is not a matter of feasible future,
7. the Armenian-Azerbaijani rapprochement or the settlement of relations is a matter of unfeasible future. We will be obviously continued to be viewed as an enemy for them. 

If you think better life will come with Artsakh's surrender, you are gravely mistaken."  

Armenia committed to principles and aims of the Council of Europe – FM

Public Radio of Armenia
Jan 25 2021

Armenia has been faithful to the commitments undertaken at the accession to the Council of Europe, including the peaceful resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Armenian Foreign Minister Ara Aivazian said in a statement on the 20th anniversary of the country’s membership to the Council of Europe.

“By acceding to the Council of Europe, Armenia joined the family of European states, with whom it shares common history, values, and ideals, as well as a vision of a future Europe, where fundamental rights and freedoms are protected for all, without distinction or discrimination,” the Foreign Minister said,

He emphasized that Armenia acknowledges and values the input of this unique organization that has remained the main human rights and democracy watchdog in Europe for over 70 years of its existence.

“The two decades of Armenia’s membership to the Council of Europe were a period of active participation and sincere cooperation. Armenia has now joined over 70 Council of Europe conventions and partial agreements, essentially building legal bridges with the Member States of the organization. In 2013 Armenia held the Presidency in the Committee of Ministers, steering common European efforts for democratic action,” the Foreign Minister stated.

He noted that democratic reforms remain a key area of our interactions with the Council of Europe, where the organization, with its valuable expertise, has become a trusted partner of Armenia.

“The Council of Europe, its experts, its monitoring and specialized bodies, such as the Venice Commission, have all had a significant contribution in our efforts to build a just and democratic society, in devising policies that would better uphold human rights and the rule of law,” Minister Aivazian added  

“Armenia has been faithful to the commitments undertaken at the accession to the Council of Europe, including the peaceful resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The recent war in Artsakh had a devastating impact on the fundamental rights and the livelihood of its people. We trust that the Council of Europe recognizes these challenges and will take steps within its mandate to protect the rights, the freedoms and the dignity of all people living in conflict zones, including in Nagorno-Karabakh,” the Foreign Minister stated.

On this special occasion of the 20th Anniversary, he reiterated Armenia’s dedication to the principles and aims of the Council of Europe.

Opposition leader believes Pashinyan will ‘rig’ proposed snap elections

Panorama, Armenia
Jan 23 2021

Ishkhan Saghatelyan, one of the leaders of the opposition Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF Dashnaktsutyun) party and coordinator of the Homeland Salvation Movement, reaffirmed the opposition support for the conduct of snap parliamentary elections in the country.

At a meeting with members of the ARF Youth Union of Armenia on Friday, he dismissed Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s claims that the opposition parties oppose early elections, but reiterated their demand for the elections to be held only after Pashinyan is removed from office.

He states Nikol Pashinyan should not continue to serve as prime minister during the elections because he will not be dealing with any issue other than the preparation for the elections during presumably five-month pre-election period, which, the opposition leader believes, will lead to an increase in the challenges facing the country.

“He will cling to power and will focus all his resources on preparing for the elections,” Saghatelyan noted.

The opposition figure believes the Armenian premier will “rig” the elections simply because he will stand trial if he fails to win reelection.

Also, he deplored the claims that Nikol Pashinyan enjoys high popular support as an “offence” to the people.

“How can a person claim to have high public support after handing over half of our lands, committing so many acts of treason and leading the country to such a situation? In general, populists can deceive the people once. These people manage to deceive their people once, but never twice,” he said.

Armenian, Russian defense ministers discuss return of prisoners of war

Save

Share

 17:22,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 21, ARMENPRESS. Defense Minister of Armenia Vagharshak Harutyunyan had a telephone conversation on January 20 with Russian Defense Minister, Army General Sergei Shoigu, the Armenian defense ministry told Armenpress.

The defense ministers discussed the bilateral cooperation in the defense sector, the operational situation in Nagorno Karabakh, the return of prisoners of war, as well as the ongoing search operations for missing in action.

The Armenian minister of defense thanked his Russian counterpart for the productive operation of the Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno Karabakh, as well as for the major assistance on solving security issues in Armenia’s Syunik province with the deployment of the Russian border troops.

The Armenian and Russian defense ministers also exchanged views on the latest regional military-political developments.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan