ANKARA: Cyprus Cannot Be Allowed To Block Turkish EU Bid, Says Jagla

CYPRUS CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO BLOCK TURKISH EU BID, SAYS JAGLAND

Hurriyet
Feb 9 2010
Turkey

Although the Cyprus problem has been used to block Turkish accession to
the European Union, Turkey has still contributed enormously to Europe,
according to Thorbjorn Jagland, secretary-general of the Council of
Europe. ‘We cannot let the Cyprus issue block accession,’ he says

Council of Europe Secretary-General Thorbjorn Jagland.

Turkish Cypriot and Greek Cypriot leaders are running out of time
to reach a settlement on the divided island, according to Council of
Europe Secretary-General Thorbjorn Jagland.

"Now, we’re in hurry. We can only hope things can be sorted out before
the elections," said Jagland in an interview with the Hurriyet Daily
News & Economic Review in Ankara.

Jagland said it was "very unfortunate" that the Greek community had
said "no" to a 2004 settlement backed by the United Nations. "They
did not use the opportunity at that time to solve the conflict."

"U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was on the island a few days ago.

It could be good sign that the U.N. [is putting] pressure on the
parties to move forward," he said.

The Cyprus issue may continue blocking Turkey’s accession to the
European Union as long as no settlement is reached, he said. "This
is a matter of fact. A unanimous decision is needed for accession of
new members."

Outlining the severity of the matter, Jagland said: "I really hope
everyone understands that this issue is important for not only Cyprus,
but [all of] Europe. It has been used to block Turkish accession."

Jagland said he has emphasized a number of times how much Turkey is
contributing to regional stability. "Turkey is now contributing to
solving conflicts in the Middle East and South Caucasus, which is
enormously important for Europe," he said, adding that the Cyprus
issue could not be allowed to derail these contributions.

Turkish deputy Mevlut CavuÅ~_oglu was recently elected president
of the council’s parliament while Turkey is also slated to assume
the chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers, the pan-European
organization’s decision-making body from November 2010 to May 2011.

"Turkey is playing such a pioneering role in Europe and in its
neighborhood; that should be appreciated," he said, adding that it
was impressive that Turkey is continuing its reform process despite
the negativity of some European leaders to the country’s EU accession.

"Turkey is moving rapidly in the right direction. They could be more
pessimism due to the remarks of some European leaders."

Islamophobia in Europe and the Turkish example

Touching on the issue of Islam in the West, Jagland said, "What
worries me is that people relate very much Islam to terrorism."

In reference to Switzerland recently banning the construction of new
minarets, he said: "The vote in Switzerland worried me a lot. People
are afraid of and go against Muslims. It is a dangerous development
when they mix up migration, unemployment and social frustration in
the big cities."

He suggested the council could do much more for intercultural an
inter-religious dialogue through educational programs, adding that
terrorist attacks have nothing to do with Islam.

"Therefore, what you’re doing in Turkey is very important, showing
the opposite example, that Islam and democracy and the rule of law
can be reconciled," he said.

New Constitution

The Constitutional Court should prosecute politicians individually
rather than closing the entire party, Jagland said. "When you ban the
entire party, it must be absolutely clear that the party is concretely
contributing to terrorist activities. Otherwise individuals should
be prosecuted."

Furthermore, he said, "Many politicians in Turkey say the Constitution
should be changed so that is not so easy to ban a party."

No involvement in Nagorno-Karabakh settlement

Asked whether the council has considered taking steps to produce
a permanent settlement in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict given that
Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey are member states, Jagland said his
body had not been asked by the parties to mediate in the process.

"First of all, I very much appreciate the protocols between the two
countries and hope it can get through both parliaments," he said. "I
think it is important that this process is being handled by national
political bodies and [receiving] support from public opinion. Without
that, it will fail."

In the end, he said there was only a little role the council could
play in the matter. "I don’t see any need for interference or any
kind of assistance to the process if the parties do not ask for it."

Opposition leader Baykal declines meeting Jagland

Council of Europe Secretary-General Thorbjørn Jagland, who has been
arranging appointments with politicians, officials, academics and
NGOs, applied for a meeting with Deniz Baykal, leader of the main
opposition Republican People’s Party, or CHP.

Baykal, however, failed to agree to a meeting with the
secretary-general. According to Baykal’s office, the CHP leader was
engaged in a group meeting in Parliament and had no time to talk
with Jagland.

Criminal Case On Attack On Shant TV Commentator Never Mnatsakanyan S

CRIMINAL CASE ON ATTACK ON SHANT TV COMMENTATOR NEVER MNATSAKANYAN SUSPENDED

ArmInfo
2010-02-10 15:34:00

ArmInfo.The criminal case on the attack on Shant TV commentator Never
Mnatsakanyan has been suspended, Police Head Alik Sargsyan told media
on Wednesday.

Two unknown attacked N. Mnatsakanyan on April 7 2009 nearly in
midnight, beat him up and escaped.

The police studied several versions from the professional activity of
Mnatskanyan up to misunderstanding. At present, he said, new versions
are studied.

Turkish Foreign Minister: Normalisation Process Can Not Continue Unl

TURKISH FOREIGN MINISTER: NORMALISATION PROCESS CAN NOT CONTINUE UNLESS ARMENIA ALTERS ITS POSITION

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.02.2010 16:35 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said that
Armenia does not show favorable intentions towards realization of
the Ankara-Yerevan protocols.

During the meeting with his Armenian counterpart in London, Davutoglu
expressed concern over Armenian Constitutional Court’s amendments to
the protocols.

"The Armenian Constitutional Court’s decision is not constructive,
bringing relations between the two countries back to the initial
level," he added.

He said the process can not continue unless Armenia agrees to
reconsider its non-constructive position.

Regarding upcoming vote on the Armenian Genocide Resolution, scheduled
by US House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman, Howard Berman for
March 4th, Davutoglu said that by raising this issue Armenia puts
obstacles in the way of normalization process, Trend News reported.

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan addressed a message to his Turkish
counterpart Abdullah Gul.

The message says,

"Our initiative aimed at normalization of bilateral relations
holds attention of the international community. This is a historic
moment for all, indeed. The efforts the countries engaged in regional
processes exert to help improvement of Armenian-Turkish relations are
indispensable. I am confident that it wouldn’t be possible to move
forward without their support. At the same time, I believe no matter
how interested friendly states might be in a positive resolution of
the impasse, there are certain things that can be done only by our
two nations.

Mr. President,

I hope you will agree that the Armenian and Turkish peoples assign the
main task of getting rid of the stereotypes regarding each other and
establishment of the atmosphere of mutual trust to their respective
governments. We can achieve results only if there is trust, resolve and
unfaltering stance. A situation when words are not supported by deeds
gives rise to mistrust and skepticism, providing ample opportunities
to counteract for those, who oppose the process. We should be mindful
of the fact that in this particular case, the time is working not
for but against the process.

If until now we have been able to bring our bilateral relations up to
a level which made the prospects of building normal relations between
our two countries more tangible and discernible, now the time has
come to manifest determination to make next major step and leave to
the coming generations a stable and secure region."

The Protocols aimed at normalization of bilateral ties and opening of
the border between Armenia and Turkey were signed in Zurich by Armenian
Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and his Turkish counterpart Ahmet
Davutoglu on October 10, 2009, after a series of diplomatic talks
held through Swiss mediation.

On January 12, 2010, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of
Armenia found the protocols conformable to the country’s Organic Law.

Commenting on the CC ruling, the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs
said that "the decision contains preconditions and restrictive
provisions which impair the letter and spirit of the Protocols."

"The decision undermines the very reason for negotiating these
Protocols as well as their fundamental objective. This approach
cannot be accepted on our part. Turkey, in line with its accustomed
allegiance to its international commitments, maintains its adherence
to the primary provisions of these Protocols. We expect the same
allegiance from the Armenian Government," the Ministry said.

The Armenian Genocide resolution (H.Res. 106) was submitted to the
House of Representatives by Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA), during
the 110th United States Congress. It is a non-binding resolution
calling upon the US President to ensure that the foreign policy of
the United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity
concerning issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing,
and genocide documented in the United States record relating to
the Armenian Genocide, and for other purposes. The resolution was
introduced on January 30, 2007.

Crossing The Line

CROSSING THE LINE
by Wendy Kristianasen

Le Monde Diplomatique

feb 9 2010
France

"A taboo has been broken," said Markar Eseyan, a columnist for the
independent Istanbul daily Taraf and the Armenian weekly Agos. "Now
we can at last acknowledge the past. The issue of genocide is a red
line, along with the Kurdish and Cyprus issues. The AKP has had the
courage to confront and even cross these red lines. It saw that in
one stroke it could both transform the way Turkey sees itself and
open it up to the world."

Eseyan is from Istanbul, one of 50,000 Armenians left in Turkey. How
does he view the protocols signed by Turkey and Armenia, on 10October
2009, which agreed to establish diplomatic ties between the countries
and called for the opening of their common border? "Many in the
diaspora do not believe that the opening is a real coming to terms.

But they have not lived here. I am hopeful that it is a beginning,
not an end."

At issue is Nagorno Karabakh (1): Turkey wants Armenia to agree to
withdraw from Karabakh, after other Azerbaijani-occupied territories,
before it will open the common border. From 2007 Armenian and Turkish
diplomats met secretly in Switzerland. Then came football diplomacy:
Armenia’s president invited his Turkish counterpart to a World Cup
match between the two national teams in Yerevan in September 2008. The
opening has been backed by Washington (and US Armenians pressured to
support it). And despite Armenian reservations and Turkey’s reluctance
to use the word genocide for the 1915 killings of the Armenians,
the countries finally signed an accord. This has yet to be ratified
by their parliaments.

This external dynamic has gone hand in hand with developments within
Turkey. The killing of the Armenian editor Hrant Dink on 19 January
2007, after he had been taken to court (like the writer Orhan Pamuk)
for insulting Turkishness under article 301 of the Penal Code, provoked
a heated debate within Turkey. A hundred thousand people protested at
Dink’s murder, demanding the annulment of article 301; it was amended
on 30 April 2008. "The taboo has gone," said Eseyan. "Not to the extent
of talking of genocide or saying that 1.5 million people were killed,
but freedom is growing and we feel better."

On Cyprus there is a sense that Turkey has done what it can and the
issue has passed out of its control. After years of gridlock, the AKP
government backed the UN peace plan under Kofi Annan. Turkish Cypriots
voted yes (by 64.9%) to the 24 April 2004 referendum under which the
constituent states would have federated and entered the European Union
as the United Cyprus Republic. The Greek Cypriots voted no (by 75.83%)
— and a week later joined the EU (whose acquis communautaire exclude
the Turkish north of the island).

This has now become a matter of credibility for the Turks, whose own EU
accession has been indefinitely postponed with the coming to power of
France’s President Sarkozy and Germany’s Angela Merkel. Even so, some
Turks see a new, if slender, hope for a solution in the election of
Greek prime minister, George Papandreou, leader of the socialist PASOK
(Panhellenic Socialist Movement), who, like his Turkish counterpart,
is pragmatic and solution-oriented. What solution might emerge is
unclear; but talks continued in January.

The opening to Iraq has brought social and economic dividends, but
also security to the autonomous Kurdistan region of northern Iraq
which borders Turkey, until recently a training ground and base for
Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) resistance. This has opened the way to an
important Kurdish initiative (now called a "democratic opening") at
home. The government has understood that it needs to defuse tensions
to end the violence in southeast Turkey and the leadership role of
the military there. The reforms have focussed on cultural and social
issues: some villages have been allowed to rename themselves, more
rights have been given to local mayors and there is greater scope
for teaching in Kurdish.

Ihsan Bal, professor at Ankara’s Police Academy and a security
expert, said: "The opening taking place in the last two years has
been substantial; this democratisation will also affect the Alevis,
Greeks and Armenians. Whether Turkey can handle all this simultaneously
is another question."

There is disagreement among Turks on this. Some say the government
has handled the affair ineptly. Others see it as a courageous advance,
especially since the high costs of policing the region and containing
the PKK risks losing many votes. Many Turks note that the Kurdish
party, the DTP (Democratic Society Party) with 21 seats, which was
closed down by the Supreme Court on 11 December, had remained silent
on the crucial issues of Turkish national life; they believe the
government should invite back exiled diaspora Kurds to stop the cult
of the imprisoned PKK leader, Abdullah Ocalan.

As Bal explained: "There has been some real reform in the prisons
and among the police." And with the revelations of the Ergenekon case
(see Turkey’s soft power successes), "the public has become aware of
what was happening in the ‘deep state’, as the Gladio formations of
the 1970s gave way to a gang culture that has infiltrated all parts of
Turkish life. In the last two years, we have at least begun to touch
the untouchables. Turkey now realises it’s not shameful, but to its
credit, to recognise past mistakes: it’s given it new credibility in
the world."

http://mondediplo.com/2010/02/06turkeyfp

Gul Will Respond To Sargsyan’s Letter, If He Crosses Over Armenia’s

GUL WILL RESPOND TO SARGSYAN’S LETTER, IF HE CROSSES OVER ARMENIA’S AIRSPACE: MANOYAN

Tert.am
14:28 ~U 09.02.10

"Addressing Abdullah Gul from Turkey’s airspace, Armenia’s president
passed on his unease," said Armenian Revolutionary Federation
(Dashnaktsutyun, or ARF-D) Armenian Cause ("Hay Dat") and Political
Affairs Bureau Director Giro Manoyan to Tert.am.

"I think that he has the right expectations from Gul, and I hope that
it will soon become clear for our president until when he can wait
for those expectations to be realized," said Manoyan.

The ARF-D bureau director is convinced that the more the ratification
of the Armenia-Turkey Protocols is delayed, the clearer it becomes
that the process is doomed to fail: "It would be good for Armenia’s
president to also accept this reality."

Asked whether Gul will respond to the Armenian president’s letter,
Manoyan said, "Perhaps he will respond – when, returning from India,
he crosses over Armenia’s airspace."

‘Everything Should Be Done To Overcome Historical Armenia-Turkey Dis

‘EVERYTHING SHOULD BE DONE TO OVERCOME HISTORICAL ARMENIA-TURKEY DISAGREEMENTS’: FRENCH AMBASSADOR TO ARMENIA

Tert.am
12:14 ~U 09.02.10

According to French Ambassador to Armenia Serge Smessow, everything
possible should be done to reach the end of the process to normalize
Armenia-Turkey relations.

In an interview with Report.am, the ambassador noted that he is
referring to the sole possibility of overcoming the historical
disagreements between the two countries: "It would be unfortunate if
everything wasn’t done to make use of that."

In the French ambassador’s opinion, the international recognition
process of the Armenian Genocide and the Armenia-Turkey Protocols
have no connection with each other.

"The way I see it, the signing of the Protocols doesn’t assume
resigning from the Armenian people’s legitimate claim for international
recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

"Put another way, if the Armenian authorities have resigned from making
that into a precondition, something that would’ve made the Protocols
talks impossible, that doesn’t mean that the Armenian people’s aim
for Genocide recognition is ignored," said Smessow.

Dedicated To Vahan Terian Book To Be Presented

DEDICATED TO VAHAN TERIAN BOOK TO BE PRESENTED

Aysor
Feb 9 2010
Armenia

Today, in the framework of celebrating Vahan Terian Days in occasion
of the 125th anniversary of the great poet, a calendar-book "Remember
Me with Kind Words in Your Hearts" will be presented in Armenia’s
National Library, organizers’ spokesperson told Aysor’s correspondent.

The book contains lots of essays about Vahan Terian and his works
by great and known people as well as poet’s photos, memories about
him, documents from Hovhannes Tumanian’s archives, works by Armenian
painters Vardges Sureniants, Martiros Sarian, Pharaon Mirzoyan, and
works by Armenian photographers Samvel Karapetian and Samvel Sevada.

The book is directed by Hovhannes Papikian and Shushanik Sahakian,
and is initiated by the Levon Mirijanian Foundation. The financial
support was provided by Ashot Kagramanian, Head of the Regional
Administration of Armavir.

The National Library of Armenia will also hold an exhibition dedicated
to Vahan Terian, making available over the period of some days to learn
more about great poet’s works, his pictures, and memories about him.

Hayastan All-Armenian Fund Constructs Aknaghbyur Community Center

HAYASTAN ALL-ARMENIAN FUND CONSTRUCTS AKNAGHBYUR COMUNITY CENTER

Aysor
Feb 9 2010
Armenia

Within the framework of its ongoing Rural Development Program, the
Hayastan All-Armenian Fund recently began construction of a vitally
needed community center in Aknaghbyur, a village in Armenia’s Tavush
Region. The project is sponsored by the fund’s French affiliate,
through the financial support of the France-based Tavitian family.

Aknaghbyur is the site of several development initiatives already
implemented by the Hayastan All-Armenian Fund. They include the
community’s state-of-the-art natural-gas, potable-water, and
irrigation networks, all of which have vastly improved the daily
lives of residents.

To date construction crews have laid the community center’s
foundations, erected the pillars, and built the supporting walls. Work
will resume following a short pause due to the harsh winter weather.

Ararat Khlghatyan, Hayastan All-Armenian fund deputy director in
charge of construction projects, said that the two-story building
of the community center will house the mayor’s office, a clinic,
a library, and a concert hall, thus becoming a vibrant hub for local
governance, healthcare, culture, and the arts.

"The Hayastan All-Armenian Fund projects carried out in Aknaghbyur
are not only helping raise the community’s quality of life, but have
inspired a renewed and very palpable sense of belonging among our
residents," said Aknaghbyur mayor Karen Dolmazyan. "Already in the
past few months we have seen an increase in the number of births,"
the mayor continued. "Moreover, four families have moved back to the
village during that period. It is so wonderful that, after so many
years of hardship, the residents of Aknaghbyur once again believe in
the future of their community."

ARFD And Heritage To Kill Protocols’ Ratification

ARFD AND HERITAGE TO KILL PROTOCOLS’ RATIFICATION

news.am
Feb 8 2010
Armenia

"If Armenia-Turkey Protocols fail to be ratified with reservations,
they should be voted down," ARF Dashnaktsutyun member Artsvik Minasyan
stated at Feb. 8 press conference.

According to him, Turkey’s current stance proves that betterment of
relations with Armenia is not its top priority and the country has
other political objectives.

"Dashnaktsutyun pledged to carry out activities amid the
parliamentarians and public to point to all threats in the documents.

ARFD and ‘Heritage’ faction aim at killing the ratification and
condemn all forces that stonewall their ‘NO’," he outlined.

ISTANBUL: Affirmation of the US Record on the Armenian Genocide Res.

Armenian ‘genocide’ bill to test US-Turkish ties again
Monday, February 8, 2010Ã`mit ENGÄ°NSOY
ANKARA – Hürriyet Daily News

A fresh Armenian `genocide’ resolution to be taken up by a
U.S. congressional panel early next monthcould once again put Turkey’s
relationship with the United States into jeopardy.
Howard Berman, the powerful Democratic chairman of the House of
Representatives’ Foreign Affairs Committee, said Feb. 5 that he
intends to call a committee vote on the resolution March 4.
The resolution would call on President Barack Obama to ensure that
U.S. policy formally refers to the World War I-era killings of
Armenians during the last days of the Ottoman Empire as `genocide’ and
to use that term when he delivers his annual message on the issue in
April ` something Obama avoided doing last year.
If the resolution is endorsed by the committee, it will next head
toward a House floor vote. The same panel passed similar bills in
2000, 2005 and 2007, but the measures never came to a floor vote. In
all three cases, the administrations of former presidents Bill Clinton
and George W. Bush strongly lobbied against the resolutions.
Although such congressional bills are non-binding, Turkey has been
warning that any formal U.S. `genocide’ recognition, either by
Congress or the administration, would cause a major and lasting
deterioration of relations with the United States. Turkish diplomats
are now emphasizing that this policy remains in place.
Armenians welcome vote move
Armenian-American groups hailed Berman’s decision to hold a vote. `We
want to thank chairman Berman for his vision and strength in taking
this bold step to send the clear message to Turkey that the United
States Congress will not be complicit in their immoral efforts to deny
truth and justice for the Armenian genocide,’ said Ken Hachikian,
chairman of the Armenian National Committee of America.
`On behalf of the entire Armenian-American community, we welcome
chairman Berman’s announcement. We appreciate the chairman
n,’ said Bryan Ardouny, executive director of the Armenian Assembly of
America.
The `genocide’ recognition bill, H.R. 252, currently has more than 130
cosponsors in the 435-member House of Representatives. Obama views
Turkey as a key ally whose help is needed to solve confrontations from
Iran to Afghanistan.
Obama, who as a candidate referred to the killings as genocide, last
April used the Armenian term for `atrocity’ in his first presidential
address on the issue, angering U.S. Armenians.
Faltering reconciliation process
The U.S. president instead fully supported a Turkey-Armenia
reconciliation process, saying that he would refrain from moves
jeopardizing this process.
In October, Turkish and Armenian foreign ministers signed a set of
agreements under which Ankara and Yerevan would set up normal
diplomatic relations and reopen their land border. But the
normalization process is now faltering.
The Turkey-Armenia accord needs to be ratified by the parliaments of
the two neighboring countries before implementation, and there is no
indication of when either nation might bring the deal to its
parliaments.
One root of the problem is the unresolved Nagorno-Karabakh dispute
between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Turkey’s close friend and ally.
Turkey first wants to see progress toward a solution to the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict before opening its border with Armenia. And
the Armenians are hinting at no sign of this.
Nagorno-Karabakh, a mostly Armenian-populated enclave inside
Azerbaijan, and parts of Azerbaijan proper have been under Armenian
occupation since a war in the early 1990s. As a result of this war,
Turkey has refused to set up normal diplomatic relations with Yerevan
and has been keeping its land border with Armenia closed since 1993.
Affirmation of the United States Record on the Armenian Genocide
Resolution (Introduced in House)

HRES 252 IH
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
Calling upon the President to ensure that the foreign policy of the
United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity c
nd genocide documented in the United States record relating to the
Armenian Genocide, and for other purposes.
March 17, 2009
Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. KIRK,
Mr. BERMAN, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ROYCE,
Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Ms. WATSON, Mr. BILIRAKIS,
Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. WU,
Mr. SIRES, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. BARRETT of South
Carolina, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. WEINER, Mr. HONDA, Mrs. MALONEY,
Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. WALZ, Mr. PETERS, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. COSTA,
Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. GARRETT of
New Jersey, Mr. WOLF, Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts, Mr. NEAL of
Massachusetts, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mrs. CAPPS,
Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. HIMES, Mr. BACA, Ms. HIRONO,
Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. FATTAH,
Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. SPACE, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin,
Mr. CALVERT, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Mr. LANCE, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of
California, Mr. OLVER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. DAVIS of
Illinois, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. VAN HOLLEN,
Ms. TITUS, Mr. STARK, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. KENNEDY,
Ms. TSONGAS, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. DREIER, Mr. NUNES,
Mr. TONKO, and Mr. TIERNEY) submitted the following resolution; which
was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

________________________________

Calling upon the President to ensure that the foreign policy of the
United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity
concerning issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and
genocide documented in the United States record relating to the
Armenian Genocide, and for other purposes.
Resolved,
SHORT TITLE
Sec. 1.
This resolution may be cited as the `Affirmation of the United States
Record on the Armenian Genocide Resolution’.
FINDINGS
Sec. 2.
The House of Representatives finds the following:
(1) The Armenian Genocide was conceived and carried out by the Ottoman
Empire from 1915 to 1923, resulting in the deportation of nearly
2,000,000 Armenians, of whom 1,500,000 men, women, and children were
killed, 500,000 survivors were expelled from their homes, and which
succeeded in the elimination of the over 2,500-year presence of
Armenians in their historic homeland.
(2) On May 24, 1915, the Allied Powers, England, France, and Russia,
jointly issued a statement explicitly charging for the first time ever
another government of committing `a crime against humanity’.
(3) This joint statement stated `the Allied Governments announce
publicly to the Sublime Porte that they will hold personally
responsible for these crimes all members of the Ottoman Government, as
well as those of their agents who are implicated in such massacres’.
(4) The post-World War I Turkish Government indicted the top leaders
involved in the `organization and execution’ of the Armenian Genocide
and in the `massacre and destruction of the Armenians’.
(5) In a series of courts-martial, officials of the Young Turk Regime
were tried and convicted, as charged, for organizing and executing
massacres
an people.
(6) The chief organizers of the Armenian Genocide, Minister of War
Enver, Minister of the Interior Talaat, and Minister of the Navy Jemal
were all condemned to death for their crimes, however, the verdicts of
the courts were not enforced.
(7) The Armenian Genocide and these domestic judicial failures are
documented with overwhelming evidence in the national archives of
Austria, France, Germany, Great Britain, Russia, the United States,
the Vatican and many other countries, and this vast body of evidence
attests to the same facts, the same events, and the same consequences.
(8) The United States National Archives and Record Administration
holds extensive and thorough documentation on the Armenian Genocide,
especially in its holdings under Record Group 59 of the United States
Department of State, files 867.00 and 867.40, which are open and
widely available to the public and interested institutions.
(9) The Honorable Henry Morgenthau, United States Ambassador to the
Ottoman Empire from 1913 to 1916, organized and led protests by
officials of many countries, among them the allies of the Ottoman
Empire, against the Armenian Genocide.
(10) Ambassador Morgenthau explicitly described to the United States
Department of State the policy of the Government of the Ottoman Empire
as `a campaign of race extermination,’ and was instructed on July 16,
1915, by United States Secretary of State Robert Lansing that the
`Department approves your procedure . . . to stop Armenian
persecution’.
(11) Senate Concurrent Resolution 12 of February 9, 1916, resolved
that `the President of the United States be respectfully asked to
designate a day on which the citizens of this country may give
expression to their sympathy by contributing funds now being raised
for the relief of the Armenians’, who at the time were enduring
`starvation, disease, and untold suffering’.
(12) President Woodrow Wilson concurred and also encouraged the
formation of the organization known as Near East Relief, chartered by
an Act of Congress, which contribu
0 to aid Armenian Genocide survivors, including 132,000 orphans who
became foster children of the American people.
(13) Senate Resolution 359, dated May 11, 1920, stated in part, `the
testimony adduced at the hearings conducted by the sub-committee of
the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations have clearly established the
truth of the reported massacres and other atrocities from which the
Armenian people have suffered’.
(14) The resolution followed the April 13, 1920, report to the Senate
of the American Military Mission to Armenia led by General James
Harbord, that stated `[m]utilation, violation, torture, and death have
left their haunting memories in a hundred beautiful Armenian valleys,
and the traveler in that region is seldom free from the evidence of
this most colossal crime of all the ages’.
(15) As displayed in the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
Adolf Hitler, on ordering his military commanders to attack Poland
without provocation in 1939, dismissed objections by saying `[w]ho,
after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?’ and
thus set the stage for the Holocaust.
(16) Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term `genocide’ in 1944, and who
was the earliest proponent of the United Nations Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, invoked the Armenian case as a
definitive example of genocide in the 20th century.
(17) The first resolution on genocide adopted by the United Nations at
Lemkin’s urging, the December 11, 1946, United Nations General
Assembly Resolution 96(1) and the United Nations Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of Genocide itself recognized the Armenian
Genocide as the type of crime the United Nations intended to prevent
and punish by codifying existing standards.
(18) In 1948, the United Nations War Crimes Commission invoked the
Armenian Genocide `precisely . . . one of the types of acts which the
modern term `crimes against humanity’ is intended to cover’ as a
precedent for the Nuremberg tribunals.
(19) The Commission stated that `[t]he provisions
Sevres were obviously intended to cover, in conformity with the Allied
note of 1915 . . ., offenses which had been committed on Turkish
territory against persons of Turkish citizenship, though of Armenian
or Greek race. This article constitutes therefore a precedent for
Article 6c and 5c of the Nuremberg and Tokyo Charters, and offers an
example of one of the categories of `crimes against humanity’ as
understood by these enactments’.
(20) House Joint Resolution 148, adopted on April 8, 1975, resolved:
`[t]hat April 24, 1975, is hereby designated as `National Day of
Remembrance of Man’s Inhumanity to Man’, and the President of the
United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation
calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day as a
day of remembrance for all the victims of genocide, especially those
of Armenian ancestry . . .’.
(21) President Ronald Reagan in proclamation number 4838, dated April
22, 1981, stated in part `like the genocide of the Armenians before
it, and the genocide of the Cambodians, which followed it–and like
too many other persecutions of too many other people–the lessons of
the Holocaust must never be forgotten’.
(22) House Joint Resolution 247, adopted on September 10, 1984,
resolved: `[t]hat April 24, 1985, is hereby designated as `National
Day of Remembrance of Man’s Inhumanity to Man’, and the President of
the United States is authorized and requested to issue a proclamation
calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day as a
day of remembrance for all the victims of genocide, especially the one
and one-half million people of Armenian ancestry . . .’.
(23) In August 1985, after extensive study and deliberation, the
United Nations SubCommission on Prevention of Discrimination and
Protection of Minorities voted 14 to 1 to accept a report entitled
`Study of the Question of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of Genocide,’ which stated `[t]he Nazi aberration has unfortunately
not been the only case of genocide in the 20th century. Am
lifying are . . . the Ottoman massacre of Armenians in 1915-1916′.
(24) This report also explained that `[a]t least 1,000,000, and
possibly well over half of the Armenian population, are reliably
estimated to have been killed or death marched by independent
authorities and eye-witnesses. This is corroborated by reports in
United States, German and British archives and of contemporary
diplomats in the Ottoman Empire, including those of its ally
Germany.’.
(25) The United States Holocaust Memorial Council, an independent
Federal agency, unanimously resolved on April 30, 1981, that the
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum would include the Armenian
Genocide in the Museum and has since done so.
(26) Reviewing an aberrant 1982 expression (later retracted) by the
United States Department of State asserting that the facts of the
Armenian Genocide may be ambiguous, the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia in 1993, after a review of documents
pertaining to the policy record of the United States, noted that the
assertion on ambiguity in the United States record about the Armenian
Genocide `contradicted longstanding United States policy and was
eventually retracted’.
(27) On June 5, 1996, the House of Representatives adopted an
amendment to House Bill 3540 (the Foreign Operations, Export
Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1997) to reduce
aid to Turkey by $3,000,000 (an estimate of its payment of lobbying
fees in the United States) until the Turkish Government acknowledged
the Armenian Genocide and took steps to honor the memory of its
victims.
(28) President William Jefferson Clinton, on April 24, 1998, stated:
`This year, as in the past, we join with Armenian-Americans throughout
the nation in commemorating one of the saddest chapters in the history
of this century, the deportations and massacres of a million and a
half Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in the years 1915-1923.’.
(29) President George W. Bush, on April 24, 2004, stated: `On this
day, we pause in remembrance of one of
century, the annihilation of as many as 1,500,000 Armenians through
forced exile and murder at the end of the Ottoman Empire.’.
(30) Despite the international recognition and affirmation of the
Armenian Genocide, the failure of the domestic and international
authorities to punish those responsible for the Armenian Genocide is a
reason why similar genocides have recurred and may recur in the
future, and that a just resolution will help prevent future genocides.
DECLARATION OF POLICY
Sec. 3.
The House of Representatives–
(1) calls upon the President to ensure that the foreign policy of the
United States reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity
concerning issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and
genocide documented in the United States record relating to the
Armenian Genocide and the consequences of the failure to realize a
just resolution; and
(2) calls upon the President in the President’s annual message
commemorating the Armenian Genocide issued on or about April 24, to
accurately characterize the systematic and deliberate annihilation of
1,500,000 Armenians as genocide and to recall the proud history of
United States intervention in opposition to the Armenian Genocide.
RESOLUTION
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
H. RES. 252