Normalization Of Armenian-Turkish Relations To Become Natural Result

NORMALIZATION OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS TO BECOME NATURAL RESULT OF PROGRESS IN NK SETTLEMENT

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
March 7 2006

YEREVAN, March 7. /ARKA/. Normalization of the Armenian-Turkish
relations will become a natural result of a progress in the Karabakh
settlement, Deputy Assistant of State for European and Eurasian
Affairs Matthew Bryza told reporters.

“I touch upon the problem of the Armenian-Turkish relations during
all my visits to Turkey or Armenia,” he said.

Bryza pointed out that during his current visit to Armenia,
issues related to electric energy exports and cooperation in
the Euro-Atlantic family were discussed in the context of the
Armenian-Turkish relations.

Armenia Is Concerned With Inner Instability Of Georgia

ARMENIA IS CONCERNED WITH INNER INSTABILITY OF GEORGIA
By Aghavni Harutyunian

AZG Armenian Daily
08/08/2006

Taking into account the blockade of Armenia carried out by Turkey
and Azerbaijan, Georgia is the main state that secures economic and
transportation exit for Armenia to the outer world. Touching upon
the factor of the Armenians in Javakhk, Serge Sargsian, RA Defense
Minister, stated in his “RA National Security Strategic Principle”
report that Armenia is concerned with the inner instability
of Georgia. The professional and economic-social status of the
Georgian-Armenians gradually gets worse and this factor is a real
threat.

It is stated in the document that instable inner political situation
of Georgia also threatens the transport communication of Armenia with
the outer world. While national intolerance may cause anti-Armenian
attitude and immigration of the Armenians from Javakhk.

On the other hand, the Georgia-Turkish and Georgian-Azeri cooperation
projects may also break the balance in our region and isolate
Armenia. In this respect, Kars-Akhalkalaki railroad is of greater
danger for us.

BAKU: Armenians Not Invited To OSCE’s Baku Event

ARMENIANS NOT INVITED TO OSCE’S BAKU EVENT

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
March 14 2006

Baku, March 13, AssA-Irada
Armenian representatives have not been invited to an event of the
European security body in Baku that is expected to draw over 100
visitors from a number of countries.

The international conference being held by the OSCE member states as
part of the preparations for the organization’s 14th economic forum
will focus on averting risks in the area of transport security.

Although it was earlier reported that an Armenian delegation was
invited to the discussions, the OSCE office in Baku did not confirm
the reports. Its spokesman Ulvi Akhundlu told AssA-Irada that such
an event is taking place in the Azeri capital for the first time and
is open for attendance by all OSCE member states.

“No special invitation has been sent to Armenian representatives or
preparations made for Armenia representatives’ visit.”

Akhundlu noted that the OSCE office is not planning to be utterly
disturbed over Armenians’ visa-related problems and security issues.

“Armenia too is an OSCE member state, and the event is open for its
representatives, just like those of other countries. It is up to
Armenians whether to come or not.”

The mentioned OSCE forum is due in Prague in May, Akhundlu added.

The hard-line Garabagh Liberation Organization (GLO) warned it would
not allow for Armenians to attend the event.

“If the OSCE tries to bring in Armenians to Baku, we will impede this
and disrupt the conference,” its chairman Akif Naghi said. He added
that GLO will stick to its tough stance, considering Armenia has
failed to take any steps to normalize its relations with Azerbaijan.

Possibilities Of Karabakh Problem Peaceful Settlement In 2006 NotExh

POSSIBILITIES OF KARABAKH PROBLEM PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT IN 2006 NOT EXHAUSTED

PanARMENIAN.Net
08.03.2006 21:14 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ During the meeting with U.S. Deputy Assistant
Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Mr. Matthew Bryza
Armenian parliament speaker Artur Baghdassaryan thanked the United
States for the assistance rendered to Armenia, reported RA NA press
service. Artur Baghdassaryan noted that the U.S.’s economic assistance
is accompanied by the assistance in conducting democratic reforms in
the republic. For his part Mr. Bryza noted that the settlement of
conflicts, energy security and economy development can be achieved
vie democratic reforms. The parties attached great importance to
the Millennium Challenge Account and also referred to the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict. According to Baghdassaryan, the possibilities to
resolve the problem in 2006 are not exhausted. Mr. Bryza also noted
the importance of the conflict settlement for the whole region. The
interlocutors also discussed the European Neighborhood Policy and
the possible development of the Euro- Atlantic cooperation.

Joan Allen Says Yes To Rhymes And Reason

JOAN ALLEN SAYS YES TO RHYMES AND REASON
By Matt Wolf

New Zealand Herald, New Zealand
March 9 2006

In Hollywood, where beauty is skin deep, Joan Allen possesses the
kind of natural radiance you can’t buy off the shelf.

Sure, Allen doesn’t make the covers of Heat and People – few performers
the wrong side of 40 do (the actress will turn 49 this month).

But in an environment that is harsher than ever to women of a certain
age, Allen is working almost constantly – five films in the past
two years – and with unwavering integrity and adventurousness, too:
not every actress would say yes to a film like Yes.

“I just feel very fortunate that I’ve got to do interesting things
with talented people,” she says during a stopover in London, a city
she has come to know pretty well in recent years.

For the Mike Binder film The Upside of Anger, co-starring Kevin
Costner, for which she has won rave reviews across the Atlantic,
Allen lived in Notting Hill and was driven every day to Hampstead,
which was substituting on screen for, of all places, suburban Detroit.

Sally Potter’s film Yes found the actress taking up residence in the
East End. And yet, she laughs, “I still can’t get my bearings here.”

The more immediate question is whether filmgoers will find their
bearings as regards Yes, a movie told not just in verse but in rhymed
iambic pentameter.

As one might expect from the director of Orlando and The Man Who
Cried, Potter’s movie is a love story but of a particularly rarefied,
high-flown kind, and it also registers as a none-too-veiled political
commentary.

Whatever one’s reaction, it’s hard not to respond to the burnished
intensity of Armenian-Lebanese actor Simon Abkarian (who was cast
in The Man Who Cried but cut from the finished feature) and to the
unforced luminosity of Allen, playing an American scientist based in
London who finds refuge from a chilly marriage to an English diplomat
(Sam Neill at his most severe) in an affair with Abkarian’s Lebanese
refugee.

The two principals go only by the names She and He. It can’t be easy
acting archetypes – characters who, Allen acknowledges, “represent,
I suppose, the Eastern and Western worlds, though I don’t want to
sound pretentious or anything”.

What’s important, she says, is Potter’s interest in bridging different
cultures and merging the political and the personal at a time when
too few movies choose that route.

“I was really drawn to Sally’s material because of that question of
how we really talk to each other; how do we try to understand.”

Potter began writing Yes on September 12, 2001, a date that resonates
throughout the film.

Says Allen: “Somebody said to Sally that it was the first therapeutic
response to 9/11 because we are all sharing a dialogue. It’s not just
one person talking while the other listens.”

Allen’s capacity for listening – for a restraint that tends to gather
force throughout a film – can often make her the quiet centre of a
noisy movie.

She got the first of her three Oscar nominations a decade ago for
playing Pat Nixon, wife of the disgraced American president, in the
Oliver Stone biopic Nixon, and was nominated again the following year
for her role in Nicholas Hytner’s film version of The Crucible.

“On film, I like work that is more introverted,” she tells me, citing
Robert Duvall’s low-key contribution to The Godfather as the sort of
acting she admires.

Her contribution to Yes is as remarkable for what goes unspoken as
for the language that Allen gets to speak, not least a scene in which
colour visibly drains from her face.

Nixon wasn’t Allen’s first big-screen splash. In 1986 she played Brian
Cox’s blind victim in Manhunter, the first Hannibal Lecter movie,
and was Jeff Bridges’ wife in Francis Ford Coppola’s little-seen but
much-admired Tucker: The Man and His Dream (1988).

A later biopic, When the Sky Falls (2000), cast Allen as a
semi-fictionalised version of the murdered Irish journalist Veronica
Guerin.

“It was very hard to understand her character,” says Allen, reflecting
on a film about a crusading woman and mother who dared to invade the
Irish underworld. “People would go, ‘Why did she do this?’, and I was
like, ‘Because she did’. You wouldn’t be asking that if she had been
a man.”

Still, her range of acting opportunities over the years seems even
now to come as something of a surprise to Allen, who says she grew up
“a gal from a little-horse Illinois town surrounded by cornfields”.

The youngest of four children, Allen had never before been to New
York when she first worked at the Lincoln Center for the Performing
Arts in the early 1980s in C.P. Taylor’s play And A Nightingale Sang.

That production was part of the widening reach of the Steppenwolf
Theatre Company of Chicago, where Allen acted with then-unknowns John
Malkovich and Gary Sinise while working as a secretary to pay the rent.

Allen soon began appearing on Broadway, winning a 1988 Tony Award
for her role in Lanford Wilson’s Burn This, and a nomination the next
year for Wendy Wasserstein’s The Heidi Chronicles.

But she hasn’t done a Broadway play since 1989, the dual result of
raising a daughter, Sadie, who is now 11, and her shifting attitude
to theatre.

“I’m just not as interested in doing the same thing every night,”
she says. “I used to love it, but it just doesn’t interest me the
way it used to.”

Besides, it’s not as if Allen has much time to miss the theatre,
as she ricochets between high-profile films such as Face/Off and The
Contender (which brought her a third Oscar nod, her first for Best
Actress) and art-house fare like Yes.

Still to come is Pushers Needed, written and directed by Irish actor
Jimmy Smallhorne, about four working-class Dublin women who visit
Lourdes.

“It’s called Pushers Needed because we push the wheelchairs of the
crippled,” says Allen, laughing at the misconception that the film
might have anything to do with drugs.

Another adventure for an actress who by now is used to them? Allen
smiles and nods.

“I haven’t done much world travelling, I have to say, but I have been
to Lourdes.”

Filmgoers keeping a keen eye on this fine actress will give thanks
for that.

* Yes is screening at Rialto cinemas now

Ukraine Has Stopped Being The Country-Guarantor In TransdnestrSettle

UKRAINE HAS STOPPED BEING THE COUNTRY-GUARANTOR IN TRANSDNESTR SETTLEMENT
Alexei Martynov To Regnum

Regnum, Russia
March 9 2006

Interview of Russian-Transdnestr Analytical Center Head

Head of the Russian-Transdnestr Information Analytical Center Alexei
Martynov has commented to a REGNUM correspondent on the resolution
by the Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers #112-R, according to which on
March 3, 2006, Ukrainian customs stopped letting in the country goods
registered by Transdnestr customs, which led to economic blockade of
the Transdnestr Moldavian Republic.

REGNUM: How would you assess actions of the Ukrainian government
towards Transdnestr?

The Ukrainian authorities have lost their temper in the tense
negotiation process on Transdnestr settlement. The Transdnestr economic
blockade, or as they call it in Ukraine, “the new rules of customs
registration of goods coming through Transdnestr and from Transdnestr,”
are in fact an instrument for strengthening Ukraine’s influence in the
negotiation process and weakening Russia’s role as a country-guarantor.

Before it, Ukraine used to postpone for unidentified term coming
to force of the agreement between Ukraine and Moldavia on customs
registration of Transdnestr goods in Moldavia, using it as a reason
for blackmailing and putting pressure upon Transdnestr. But now,
somebody in the Ukrainian leadership or all of them has lost temper,
as I said, and this happened.

REGNUM: Do you think, there is any connection between the recent
decision not to open polling stations for Ukrainian citizens living
in Transdnestr and the resolution of the Ukrainian government on
toughening the regime of goods transition?

Situationally, it is undoubtedly connected. But I do not think that
these actions were well-considered and planned. Most probably,
it should be regarded as hasty reciprocal steps in response to
Transdnestr’s tough position in the talks on Transdnestr conflict
settlement.

REGNUM: What are the results of Transdnestr blockade for the republic’s
economy?

On the reason that the flow of goods from Transdnestr as well as to
Transdnestr and transit via Transdnestr are ceased, for these days
the Transdnestr budget has lost about $10 million. But I am sure
that Transdnestr residents in this case will resist to the end,
even if they are subjected to siege.

REGNUM: You say, the resolution by the Ukrainian government was aimed
at strengthening Ukraine’s role in the negotiation format, however,
on March 4, Transdnestr’s foreign ministry has put under question
Ukraine’s right to speak as a country-guarantor in the Transdnestr
settlement…

In this situation, actions of the Ukrainian government can be
characterized by the words of the Russia’s Ambassador in Ukraine
Viktor Chernomyrdin: “We wanted to the best way, and it turned out
to be as it always happens.” It was not the first case of dull and
short-sighted policy of the Ukrainian authorities.

This way or another, by these actions Ukraine actually recalled
its signature under the Memorandum of 1997 and stopped being the
country-guarantor in Transdnestr settlement, but became a party
in the conflict. The Memorandum of 1997 guarantees independence to
Transdnestr in its economic activity, and the Moldavian authorities
can speak as much as they want about absence of mechanisms for enacting
the Memorandum’s statements, but it is not Transdnestr’s problem, but
a problem of the countries-guarantors in the Transdnestr settlement
and Ukraine as well.

The recent developments have shown clearly the fact that Ukraine’s
President Viktor Yushchenko has no control over the situation
in the country. In his statements he has repeatedly guaranteed
observance of rights of all Ukrainian citizens, including those
living in Transdnestr, at the same time, the Ukrainian government,
the foreign ministry and the customs by their activity denied the
president’s statements.

Actually, Yushchenko has entered the list of noncontractual leaders
of CIS leaders, I mean Moldavian President Voronin and Georgian
President Saakashvili. Now no one can deal with Yushchenko anyway,
as well as with other above mentioned politicians.

REGNUM: For whose support can Transdnestr reckon in this situation?

I think, in this situation the Transdnestr Moldavian Republic will
be supported by the “CIS-2” countries entering the so-called club of
unrecognized states – Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Karabakh. Undoubtedly,
Russia will render assistance to Transdnestr, taking into
consideration the fact that about 100,000 Russian citizens live in
Transdnestr. Moreover, if the blockade brings about a humanitarian
catastrophe with all the resulting consequences – food deficit,
refugees, Russia as a country-guarantor would render humanitarian
help to the republic.

Major Transdnestr enterprises belong to Russian capital, so the
Russian Industrialists and Entrepreneurs Union and the Russian Trade
and Industrial Chamber will participate in solving this problem.

I am sure, the Russian State Duma that cooperates closely with the
Transdnestr Supreme Council will make a statement on the issue. As
for the exact actions, Russia could apply analogous and even tougher
sanctions towards Ukraine in response to the Transdnestr blockade:
it can impose a ban for Ukrainian goods crossing the Russian border,
although from the point of view that, as I already said, the Russian
capital and Russian citizens do suffer from the actions of the
Ukrainian and Moldavian authorities too.

REGNUM: What do you think the international community will react to
the Transdnestr blockade?

Reaction of the international community has already been given. EU’s
foreign policy chief Xavier Solana announced on March 6, that
he welcomed “the start of realization of the joint statement of
Ukrainian and Moldavian prime ministers of December 2005” and calls
for “Transdnestr self-proclaimed authorities not to put obstacles on
the way of registration.”

Evidently, the reaction of the international community to the
issue should derive from principles of democracy, human rights and
international law regulations protection, but we have to state for
just another time that the so-called international community in the
person of the West pursues double policy standards policy regarding
the Transdnestr problem, and the statement made by Solana is just
another proof of it.

Life of faith inspiration for book to help others

PRESS OFFICE
Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern)
630 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Contact: Jake Goshert, Coordinator of Information Services
Tel: (212) 686-0710 Ext. 60; Fax: (212) 779-3558
E-mail: [email protected]
Website:

February 14, 2006
___________________

DIOCESE’S NEW PRAYER BOOK GIVES YOUNG ADULTS MEANINFGUL CONNECTION TO THE
LORD

It’s comforting to know that there’s someone you can call any time —
someone who will never put anyone on hold.

Through prayer we can connect to God in a truly meaningful way.

Now, with its new prayer book aimed at young adults and relevant to people
of many ages, the Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern) is
working to help every Armenian grow closer to God, through the power of
prayer.

The book, “Here I Am, Lord,” is a collection of prayers and meditations for
young adults drawn from the Bible, traditional Armenian prayers, and
original prayers written specifically for this project.

The book was made possible thanks to a generous donation from the husband of
Rose Mekenian, a former Diocesan Council member who was also a devoted high
school educator and administrator.

Additional support for the project came from Rose’s son, Stephen, and his
family, along with Michael and David Kasparian and their families; the
brothers are the sons of Lillian (Kasparian) Chapian the late Caspar
Kasparian, long-time friends of the Mekenians.

“George Mekenian thought such a book would be an appropriate memorial to his
wife, Rose,” said Elise Antreassian, coordinator of Christian education for
the Diocesan Department of Youth and Education and editor of the book. “He
thought it would be a fitting tribute to her love of young people if this
pocket-sized book was made available to throw into backpacks or briefcases,
or just to have handy. Rose was a devoted and successful teacher, who had a
special affection for this age group.”

The book is an ideal way to get high school seniors and new college students
geared up for the habit of prayer. They are encouraged to start using the
prayers in this book for inspiration in building a life of prayer. Each
page includes not only prayers but reflection questions, allowing them to
dig deeper into their faith.

To facilitate use in everyday life, the book lists prayers in categories
related to daily activities. For example, there are prayers to use when
you’re feeling lousy, before an exam, when making an important decision, and
before a date.

For George Mekenian, the book is just a continuation of his late wife’s
effort to provide guidance and direction to young people.

“Throughout her career she was very intellectually and emotionally involved
with young people. And her connection to the Armenian Church faith was very
strong,” he said of his wife, who along with being a member of the Diocesan
Council also served on ACYOA Central Council, the Diocese’s Religious
Education Committee, and in the choir and women’s guild at St. Thomas Church
in Tenafly, NJ. “She sensed the need, especially in young Armenians, for a
means of identifying and finding something to nurture them in the Armenian
Church family.”

That love for young people comes through in an essay by Rose that is
included in the new book. In it, she addresses recent high school graduates
as they transition into adulthood.

“You perhaps have discovered that life can seem quite meaningless at times
unless you find values onto which you can hold and to which you can relate
your judgments and actions,” she wrote. “Some people term this ‘tuning in
God.’ Having a philosophy of life is vital to each individual.”

“Here I Am, Lord” is the latest of several publications from the Diocese to
focus on bringing young people into the life of the church.

“This year, as the Diocese continues focusing on bringing our unique
Armenian Christian faith into the homes of our young members, I hope every
young Armenian will begin using this book,” said Archbishop Khajag
Barsamian, Primate of the Eastern Diocese. “Prayer can shape our lives for
the better. I encourage everyone to take the effort to form a life-long
habit of talking with our Lord through prayer.

“Here I Am, Lord” is available for $6; it can be purchased through the St.
Vartan Bookstore by going to or by calling (212)
686-0710 ext. 52.

— 3/14/06

E-mail photos available on request. Photos also viewable in the News and
Events section of the Eastern Diocese’s website,

PHOTO CAPTION (1): The Diocese’s newest prayer book, “Here I Am, Lord,” is
specially designed for young adults but usable by everyone. It is available
for purchase from the St. Vartan Bookstore.

# # #

www.armenianchurch.org
www.stvartanbookstore.com
www.armenianchurch.net.

Armenia’s Draft Budget 2006 To Allocate 39.1 Bln AMD For Medicine

ARMENIA’S DRAFT BUDGET 2006 TO ALLOCATE 39.1 BLN AMD FOR MEDICINE

ArmInfo News Agency, Armenia
Oct 17 2005

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 17. ARMINFO. Armenia’s draft budget 2006 allocates
39.1 bln AMD for medicine against 32.1 bln AMD in 2005, says Armenia’s
Health Care Minister Norayr Davidyants.

This includes the WB health care projects worth 3.7 bln AMD. Special
attention will be paid to the first aid – 14.3 bln AMD – 24.7% more
than in 2005. Out-patient treatment will be free of charge for all
ages except for dental services – free for children under 8 and people
over 65 only.

Family and children’s doctors will get 11,000 AMD more – 58,400 AMD
a month. Narrow specialists will get 50,000 AMD against 25,000 AMD
in 2005. 1 bln AMD will be allocated for the treatment of children
against 700 mln AMD in 2005. 1.2 bln AMD will be allocated for over
200 free first necessity medicines.

14.4 bln AMD will be allocated for in-patient treatment against 13.3
bln AMD in 2005 – 9,000 AMD per in-patient against 4,348 AMD per
out-patient. 2.1 bln AMD will be allocated for sanitary services with
sanitarians to enjoy 10,000 AMD raise to 45,000 AMD a month.

343 mln AMD will be spent on the repairs of hospitals.

Benefit Instead Of Debt

BENEFIT INSTEAD OF DEBT
Lena Badeyan

A1+
| 12:20:14 | 15-10-2005 | Politics |

In the opinion of economist Eduard Aghadjanov, the program of returning
the deposits is not an economic but a populist step and the decision
has all the chances to remain on paper.

The budget for 2006 provides for a sum of $140 million to be allocated
for the reimbursement of the deposits. “I was always surprised how
inattentiveness of our authorities towards this issue”, he says. In
his opinion the government will not be able to return the deposits
with the means of donor organizations. The economist also noted that
in 14 states the deposits have been already returned.

The soon return of deposits seems unreal Eduard Aghadjanov, however
he is not pessimistic. The authorities have undertaken a serious
step forward.

According to his calculations shadow economy in Armenia makes
50%. He thinks that the authorities decided to arouse the issue on
the threshold of the constitutional referendum.

Nobel adversaries

The Observer / The Guardian, UK
Oct 16 2005

Nobel adversaries

Robert McCrum

Some years ago in transit through Bangkok, I found myself in the
airport bookshop browsing a paperback novel by a local writer with an
almost unpronounceable name. I forget the title, but the publisher’s
blend of chutzpah and wishful thinking was memorable. In large red
letters above the author’s name was the legend: ‘Shortlisted for the
Nobel Prize’.
Unlike Booker, the Nobel does not go in for a shortlist, at least in
public. The academy’s business is conducted behind closed doors and
what we are allowed to see is all very Swedish. Where Booker triggers
an avalanche of press releases, parties and book-trade promotions,
Nobel amounts to one man (the secretary of the academy) standing in a
baroque salon and uttering one name to the world’s press on a
Thursday in early October. This statement is often followed by a
chorus of: ‘Who? Who?’, but since the academy never gives interviews,
no one is really any the wiser.

This bizarre ritual is now just over 100 years old. It’s an odd,
publicity-averse moment for a prize distinguished by sometimes
wayward eccentricity. The first Nobel (1901) should have gone to Leo
Tolstoy, but in the end it was awarded to an obscure French poet,
Rene Francois Armand Sully Prudhomme. That decision established a
preference for the maverick that persisted throughout the subsequent
century.

Since then, Nobel has made some good choices – Eliot, Beckett,
Bellow, Marquez, Heaney – and some gobsmackers: Galsworthy, Pearl S
Buck, Winston Churchill and Nelly Sachs. En passant, it has
overlooked Nabokov, Jorge Luis Borges and Graham Greene. Jean-Paul
Sartre turned it down in 1964, saying he did not want to be read by
‘celebrity collectors’.

The prize has also shied away from controversy. So there were no
awards from 1940 to 1943. In 1958, at the height of the Cold War, the
academy gave it to Boris Pasternak. There was a huge row with the
Soviet Union and since then the Nobel committee has opted for a quiet
life.

Quiet and, some might say, occasionally incomprehensible. For
instance, in the last decade, the Nobel has gone to Dario Fo (near
universal dismay), Gao Xingjian (bafflement) and, in 2004, the
reclusive Elfriede Jelinek.

So much for the global picture. From an insular, British point of
view, apart from Churchill, Golding (1983), and Bertrand Russell
(1950), Nobel has generally ignored English literature.

This makes the choice of Harold Pinter all the more welcome. Here,
beyond question, is a world-class playwright whose selection almost
on the day of his 75th birthday, will be the cause of widespread
rejoicing.

While The Observer congratulates the Swedish Academy for choosing a
great writer of international stature whose work has resonance around
the world, we cannot overlook the missed opportunity inherent in this
decision.

As Pinter himself will be only too well aware, Turkey’s most
distinguished living writer is Orhan Pamuk, author of The White
Castle, My Name Is Red and Snow. Pamuk currently faces trial for
making public reference to the genocidal Armenian massacres. His case
goes to court on 16 December; and, if convicted, he faces a
three-year prison sentence.

It’s wonderful news that Pinter is our latest Nobel laureate, but the
Swedes have missed a golden opportunity to take a stand against a
shameful and trumped-up assault on a writer’s freedom. Pinter would
be the first to recognise this.