Tbilisi: NATO does not intend to get involved in Karabakh conflict

NATO does not intend to get involved in Karabakh conflict

The Messenger, Georgia
Feb 11 2005

According to the Azeri newspaper Novoye Vremia, NATO Deputy Assistant
Secretary General Patrick Hardouin stated at a press conference
this week that NATO is interested in the stability and security of
the South Caucasus. He spoke during a NATO two-day seminar in Baku
“Security of the South Caucasus and NATO’s role.”

According to him, stability in the region must be based on economic
growth, macroeconomic stability and democracy. “Despite certain
achievements in this sphere, lots of unsolved issues remain in the
region,” stated Hardouin, noting that such issues as the development of
free trade and macroeconomic stability were discussed at the seminar
as well.

They also discussed the issue of energy security, particularly the
issue of the security of the oil pipeline Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan. The
paper reports that NATO is interested in the secure operation of the
transport corridors in the South Caucasus.

Hardouin stressed that the conflicts in the South Caucasus negatively
influence on the stability and security in the region. “NATO does
not intend to be engaged in these conflicts, he said, adding however
that Brussels “is ready to support all attempts to achieve a fair
settlement of these conflicts.”

According to Hardouin, NATO follows the consensus principle when
making decisions regarding joint operations. The paper notes that
NATO supports the termination of nuclear programs in Iran.

Hardouin also told journalists that the opening of the office for
the special representative of the NATO General Secretary in South
Caucasus and Central Asia will take place in Tbilisi. He said that
the special representative will work in Tbilisi and will periodically
visit the region’s countries.

Georgian president urges better ties with Russia in address toparlia

Georgian president urges better ties with Russia in address to parliament

Rustavi-2 TV, Tbilisi
10 Feb 05

President Mikheil Saakashvili has set out the challenges he sees
facing Georgia in his annual address to parliament and said that he is
ready to go to Russia to meet President Putin to improve relations. He
said, however, that “compromise is a two-way street” and that the two
countries should meet each other halfway. He described relations with
Georgia’s other immediate neighbours, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey,
as “ideal and idyllic” and again welcomed the election of Georgia’s
“friend” Viktor Yushchenko as Ukrainian president. Most of the
50-minute address was devoted to the government’s “achievements”
over the past 12 months. Saakashvili said that in that period a
“demoralized” country had been transformed into “a functioning state
with powerful institutions”. He also acknowledged the existence
of problems such as insufficient new jobs, low salaries in the
education sector and the need to reform the judiciary. The following
is an excerpt from Saakashvili’s address on 10 September, which was
broadcast live by Rustavi-2 TV; subheadings inserted editorially:

[Saakashvili] Madam Speaker, Your Holiness, esteemed chairman of the
Constitutional Court, chairman of the Supreme Court, esteemed members
of parliament and the public. Before I commence my speech, I would
like to say that much has been said about the late Zurab Zhvania in
recent days and I do not want to repeat anything. I simply want to
mention that the late Zurab Zhvania’s mother Rema and wife Nino are
attending this session today. I want us all to greet them as well as
[Zhvania’s children] little Liza, Busa and Anna. [Applause]

Please, take your seats.

Achievements

More than a year has passed since Georgia made its choice for
freedom and since the Georgian nation decided on the country’s new
orientation and embarked on a new, complex and ambitious road towards
regaining the motherland that had been lost and taken away from us. A
little more than a year has passed since I was sworn in as Georgia’s
president. Shortly afterwards this parliament was elected. I, as
a member of several previous parliaments, can say with confidence
that this is the best parliament to meet in this hall. Before we
begin discussing our present and future and before we talk about our
achievements and plans, I suggest we recall what Georgia was like a
year ago.

Georgia was a failed state – disintegrated, demoralized and
humiliated. It was a country that had lost all attributes of statehood;
a country where corruption, lawlessness and injustice reigned supreme;
a country where ordinary citizens were routinely cheated by the state;
a country where the state and its representatives were constantly
extorting money from ordinary citizens; a country that had no budget
and that never fulfilled social pledges to its citizens; a country
where human rights were blatantly violated; a country that had no
defence capabilities, not a single working tank or enough ammunition
to last for just an hour in battle. The army had been starving for
months. It was a country that had already disintegrated and fallen
into the hands of clans, feudal lords and fiefs.

We are now used to seeing in this hall the chairman of Ajaria’s
government and Ajaria’s other leaders. However, a year ago Ajaria
was ruled by a separatist feudal lord who, as a matter of principle,
refused to come to Tbilisi and the Georgian president had to pay
him visits and beg him to comply in a most humiliating way. It was a
country that had lost its international reputation and no-one anywhere
respected it; a country which was devoid of national ideals and which
had lost its direction and sense of purpose; a country that was losing
its most respectable sons and daughters every day and whose people
had completely lost a sense of unity; a country where citizens mainly
dreamt of escaping as quickly as possible and finding refuge abroad.

That is how we see it now and what the Georgian people has achieved
in a year, which is a negligible period in history.

This is certainly not the right time for self-congratulation. We have
no right to discuss or to be content with our achievements. Last year
was only a beginning. However, it is important to ask this question:
how much ground have we covered this year? Today Georgia is a proper
state. When people ask us about our main achievement, we say that
our main achievement is that for the first time in modern history,
Georgia has become a proper state.

The past year has witnessed budgetary successes, a tripling of
the budget, better revenue collection, the curbing of contraband,
introduction of a new tax code, successful work with all international
organizations. In that respect, Georgia is a model country where every
programme is working in a model way. Financial amnesty. These success
stories are important, however what they mean to our daily lives is
even more important. It means that we have managed to clear pension
and wage arrears accumulated over a decade. It means that we have kept
our promise and doubled pensions. Wages and pensions are being paid
without delay and we are all used to it now. It means that for the
first time in our country’s history government employees manage to
live on their salaries. That has become possible, so the main motive
for taking bribes has disappeared. It means social pledges that have
been fulfilled and increased wages in various sectors.

[Passage omitted]

Privatization

I would like to talk about our economic plans. We have begun the
privatization process and we must understand what it is for. It does
not mean, as is often presented, that we used to have property and
now we have none left. On the contrary, we have property that needs
investing in. This is not like the privatization that took place
before, like the so-called privatization programmes where people
would get facilities for free in return for investing 20m 20 years
later. No way, invest now so that you have a return on this investment,
so that you create jobs, so that enterprises start working and so
that we get some money out of this.

This is a favourable position to be in, especially for four major
sectors. This includes the energy sector. We have to improve power
supply by next winter, which at present is the biggest failure of
our government. Tbilisi and Batumi are supplied with electricity 24
hours a day, but in the rest of Georgia there are problems almost
everywhere. This is where investments have to be made and this is
what we need the money for.

In health care, we urgently need money to build new hospitals, because
we are losing our medicine, which is effectively is on the verge of
ruin. In education, we are building new schools. There will be a new
school of administration in Kutaisi where representatives of national
minorities will also study. It is very important that this school is
properly funded and that the funding of our universities and scholars
is also increased.

As regards defence capabilities, the country should no longer be
a pushover. All of this costs money and this money is not going to
come easily. Georgia has no oil, Georgia’s main asset is its people
and this asset should start working, people should start working in
enterprises and these enterprises should have real owners. This is
what privatization is about.

[Passage omitted]

Challenges, future reforms

Those were our achievements in the past year, and I am sure that this
is only a beginning. But I am asking this question: is it enough? Of
course not, we should not be content with it. Of course our main
goals are yet to be achieved. We are still facing major challenges.

We have managed to double pensions and establish order in the payment
of salaries. However – I know this very well and I always remember this
– we have not been able to increase salaries for teachers and other
education professionals, but we will certainly do it this year. We have
eradicated corruption and lawlessness in the energy sector, but, as you
know and as I have told you, this still remains a very serious problem
in some regions, especially in Samegrelo and Imereti. We have carried
out structural reorganization of the public sector, we have reduced
bureaucracy and streamlined the public sector. But we also had to make
job cuts, which was inevitable. No-one should have illusions about it.

Unfortunately, we have been unable to create a sufficient number
of new jobs in the private sector, and that is a very painful issue
for us. Georgia has managed to overcome a crisis when it seemed that
we were doomed to fail, but we have not been able to transform our
country into a European-type economy.

So what are our tasks now? Above all, it is new jobs. This cannot
be achieved through mechanical growth. We should develop spheres
which can create more jobs: tourism, tourism infrastructure, service
industries, processing of agricultural produce and penetration of
new markets. We should facilitate business initiatives not only
in Tbilisi but, especially, in other parts of Georgia. We should
develop infrastructure in order to develop business. But only the
state can invest in infrastructure projects like roads, bridges and
water supply systems. We should tackle the energy crisis. No matter
how much more electricity we produce, demand will continue to rise
as the economy grows.

We should complete education reforms. That is very important, we cannot
retreat here, and we will not give in to any blackmail, because that
is something our children, grandchildren and their grandchildren
will benefit from. That is something which will, in the long term,
transform Georgia into a truly developed country.

We should carry out reforms of the judiciary. When we started these
reforms, they were based on correct principles, but a dry place cannot
exist in the middle of a swamp. That reform was not followed by reforms
in the police and prosecutor’s office and, in reality, courts have
been discredited. I support the efforts by the parliament’s legal
committee. We will be unable to work miracles here, but we should
achieve real independence for the courts. This independence is not what
some judges think it is. This is not independence from conscience,
law and justice. This is independence from pressure, but it also
means an enormous responsibility to the public, rather than to the
authorities. Unfortunately, currently there is no such feeling of
responsibility in 90 per cent of the judiciary. This problem needs
serious attention if we want to achieve anything. I am grateful to
[Supreme Court Chairman] Mr Kote Kemularia who has started serious
processes. He will probably do more in his new position [as justice
minister]. He will also be chairman of the Council of Justice.

As regards local government reform, unlike my predecessor, I admit
that I am not good enough – and nobody is, not even some reincarnated
genius – to fill all local government jobs from the centre. That
is impossible, and whoever tried it has failed. Of course, at local
government level, district administrators and all mayors in Georgia
should be elected through an appropriate voting system. This should
be implemented next year, and we should pass appropriate legislation
this year.

I am grateful to Mr Vano Khukhunaishvili’s [parliamentary] committee
which has done a lot in this regard. I am grateful to Mr Ivliane
Khaindrava [MP] who has submitted very interesting proposals
about creating regional legislative bodies that would keep tabs
on the activities of appointed governors. We should implement the
subsidiarity principle in Georgia by taking into account all these
proposals and initiatives.

As regards the reduction of the number of parliament deputies to 150,
I discussed this issue with various parliamentary groups yesterday
and I am very grateful to all groups who supported this idea. This
is a test for Georgian parliamentarianism and the Georgian political
spectrum. Some 2.3m people said [in a 2003 referendum] that the
number of parliament deputies should not exceed 150. Anyone who
rejects this will be simply spitting in the face of 2.3m people.
We must understand this. In a normal, democratic country people would
never forgive that. Of course, this should be a balanced reduction,
of course there should remain at least 50 deputies from single-seat
constituencies, and of course the system of proportional representation
[party lists] should also be retained.

We should also think about establishing an upper house as it is in
other democratic countries. Work on this model is under way. Parliament
is based on the principle of checks and balances. Of course, we should
do it. This will be our main test which will reveal if this parliament
has again become a corporate parliament or it has developed into a
truly popular body which always listens to voters, a parliament which
always thinks how to interact with voters, rather than thinks that,
once elected, it can rest assured for four years.

I really admire our parliament. This is the first parliament which has
set a major record – for a year deputies have not beaten each other
up. That is an amazing achievement of Georgian democracy. [Passage
omitted]

Foreign relations

Now, as regards our foreign policy, you will have noticed that
Georgia has become a completely different country, a country that
is particularly attractive to the rest of the world. I know of few
countries in the world that attract such interest. I do not think
that what I have just said is an exaggeration.

This interest is justified not because Georgia’s leader has
destroyed something somewhere [reference to former President Eduard
Shevardnadze’s role in the fall of the Berlin Wall]. That is not a
good advertisement for Georgia, even if you have destroyed something
that was worth destroying.

This interest does not arise solely because we are some kind of
corridor [reference to President Shevardnadze’s Eurasian transit
corridor project]. However good the corridor, it is still not nice
when you are merely a corridor.

The reason for this interest is not that we have performed some miracle
here and that strange things keep happening here, so the entire world
is ready to support us as long as we calm down.

No, we are indeed an interesting country. Heads of several leading
committees in the Russian Duma, when asked about last year’s
highlights, named Georgian reforms. That is despite the fact that
throughout the year they were being shown films such as “Misha”
[profile of Saakashvili shown on Russian NTV last October] and others
portraying Georgia in the most terrible light. Nevertheless, they
have said that Georgia is a most successful country.

You have seen what happened in friendly Ukraine. Another country has
emerged on former Soviet territory which has a similar government
based on similar principles. Therefore, being a genuinely democratic
country, it is Georgia’s true friend. That is the elected government
of our friend [President] Viktor Yushchenko and [Prime Minister]
Yuliya Tymoshenko.

With our closest neighbours, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey, we
have idyllic relations, ideal and idyllic. We should cherish these
relations.

Naturally, with our other neighbour, Russia, there were problems but
we should certainly overcome these problems. However, compromise is a
two-way street, rather than Chiaberashvili’s triangle in the centre of
Tbilisi [reference to a controversial one-way traffic system introduced
recently by Tbilisi mayor Zurab Chiaberashvili]. When we take steps,
so should the other party. When we compromise, so should the other
party. On these terms, we are ready to reach agreement.

I am ready to go to Moscow again. I am ready to meet President Putin
again. I am ready to extend our hand of friendship again, which,
despite the fact that Georgian society welcomed this a year ago,
has remained in the air.

We should also understand and we should agree – [changes thought]
By the way, I really liked [opposition Conservative Party MP] Koba
Davitashvili’s statement two days ago. There are many things Koba does
that I do not like at all. However, this was the right thing to do. He
said that there are certain principles which all political parties
should accept. No political party or person can overstep this mark.

We should all decide and agree on what these principles are. They
are Georgia’s European orientation, the principle that there should
be no foreign bases on Georgian territory, the principle that any
party announcing that Georgia does not need a European orientation,
will not integrate into international organizations we are trying
to join, that we need foreign bases and foreigners should interfere
in Georgia’s development by military or some other illegal means –
any such party should automatically be declared outside the law.

This kind of party won parliamentary elections in Lithuania. It was
almost certain to form a parliamentary majority. However, all other
parties, which had always been fighting each other, decided to unite
and say: let us put everything aside because Lithuanian independence
is the most important thing now. They managed to form a parliamentary
majority and stopped that party coming to power, a party which had
spent hundreds of millions of dollars that had come from abroad to
seize power in that country by democratic means. We should learn to
operate in this way if we want our independence to survive.

Ethnic minorities

At the same time, we should learn to cooperate in a different way with
the various ethnic groups. Not only should they respect the Georgian
state, [ethnic] Azerbaijanis who are being taught Georgian should
not question the benefits of learning Georgian. They should know
that, once they have become part of the Georgian state, they will
be appointed to senior posts, they will have proper salaries, and
their rights will be exactly the same as those of all other citizens
of Georgia. In that case, not only will they learn the language and
not only will they not run away anywhere, but they will also serve in
the Georgian army, be ready to spill blood to defend Georgia and be
an inalienable and incorruptible part of the Georgian state organism.

We have destroyed many myths. For example, I have visited Akhalkalaki
[mainly ethnic Armenian populated town in southern Georgia]. For many
years there was talk that it was dangerous even to go to Akhalkalaki,
let alone walk in the streets and speak to local people. In fact, it is
a part of Georgia like any other, a place where people love our flag,
anthem and statehood, just as they do in the rest of Georgia. They
were offended by claims to the contrary that had been made for so
many years.

When we talk about our [ethnic] Azerbaijanis, we must understand
that they are our people. When there was some trouble there in 1991,
villagers did not bring their produce to our markets for two days,
so a famine started in Tbilisi. These people have successfully worked
in the fields of culture and science for decades and centuries and
they are an inalienable part of Georgian society.

That is why we are setting up a school of administration to train
these people and select the best among them. They will then serve
in customs and tax services and in parliament as both officials
and MPs. Some of them are already MPs but there should be more of
them. They should work at ministries.

There are very many interesting people. There is one person I wanted
to be here today. His name is Alik Kozaev. He is a young man, an
NGO activist from Tskhinvali. Last summer he helped more than 800
children from Tskhinvali, Java, Kvaisa, Znauri District and other
places in the Tskhinvali region to come here. He was taking risks
and he was doing it without receiving any remuneration. He was doing
it in order to destroy the wall of mistrust and hatred that exists
between Georgia and the Ossetians living there and replace it with
a bridge of friendship and brotherhood.

The price this man had to pay is that for many months now he
has been in prison in Tskhinvali, on the territory of Georgia. We
should be ashamed of the fact that this is still possible today. The
international community should also be ashamed that it is keeping
quiet about it and pretends that these are merely small aspects of
an ordinary conflict. If we turn a blind a eye to this, then we will
certainly turn a blind eye to an even bigger tragedy in the future. I
would like to ask you to stand up, applaud Alik Kozaev and demand
his release. [Applause, everybody rises]

What have we learnt in the past year? We have learnt that Georgia can
be a functioning state with powerful institutions. We have learnt that
our nation draws its strength from its unique historical experience
and the fact that it consists of many ethnic groups. There are so many
different people here, which is our strength. We draw our strength
from our great culture of tolerance and from our unity. We have learnt
that unity is our strength. By the way, we were taught this best by
Davit Aghmashenebeli [medieval Georgian king]. The main lesson we
have learnt about when Georgia was strong is that it happened when
Georgia belonged to all its sons and daughters at the same time, when
the authorities recognized everyone, considered everyone’s interests
and respected every religion.

Orthodox Church

Naturally, I confirm that the Orthodox religion has always played a
special role in Georgia. Any attempts – I do not want to beat about
the bush here – to undermine the unity of the Georgian Orthodox Church,
any attacks on the Georgian patriarch, are in fact totally unacceptable
political steps. There are certain rules of the game in politics. We
should not overstep this mark. It is wrong to score political points
by starting intrigues within the church. The unity of our church and
its special role at the most crucial times in our history, when on 22
November 2003 the chair in which His Holiness is sitting now was empty
[reference to the patriarch not arriving for the opening session of
parliament] – [changes tack] This was not participation in politics. It
was an act of civil heroism through nonparticipation. [Applause]

[Passage omitted]

Government

We have learnt that the country can be both democratic and stable. We
have learnt that we can have an honest, decent government that
is trusted by the people. We may not like the government – there
are many aspects of its work I am unhappy about – however, everyone
acknowledges that this is a clean government, the cleanest government
on the territory of the former Soviet Union.

This government has replaced real dinosaurs. The majority of them have
now spent some time in appropriate places and, just as we promised
the people, have paid back some of the money they stole. However,
there are still some people who have again become candidates [for
imprisonment] and we are building separate facilities for them.

Completely different people have arrived, which is something that
should be especially appreciated. We have nominated Zurab Noghaideli
as prime minister. There is just one reason why I have nominated
Zurab Noghaideli. If there is one area in which we can claim success,
it would be the timely payment of salaries and pensions and increased
revenues. This has been achieved by the Finance Ministry. When a person
works so well, he should be promoted. This is a simple principle in
proper politics and a matter of fairness.

The government is also getting stronger because the chairman
of the Supreme Court [Kote Kemularia] is now becoming deputy
prime minister and minister of justice. The Ministry of Justice
is very important. Almost all the ministers will remain in their
posts. Naturally, there are some changes. Naturally, there will be
frequent reshuffles. All the past reshuffles have proved successful.
[Irakli] Okruashvili is the best defence minister we have ever
had. [Giorgi] Baramidze was a better interior minister than his
predecessors. Then, an even better interior minister, Okruashvili,
replaced him. Then, Okruashvili was replaced by an even better
interior minister, [Vano] Merabishvili. Okruashvili was a good
prosecutor-general but he was replaced by an even better one, [Zurab]
Adeishvili. Every reshuffle has resulted in an improvement. That is
why we should not be afraid of this.

It is also true that our best professionals are in parliament. On the
one hand, it would be risky to drain parliament of its human resources,
but, on the other hand, there is a feeling that many of them – this is
linked to the down-sizing of parliament – should be in the executive
because that is where everyday problems are decided. Having said that,
I would like to express my gratitude to you for the work you have
carried out here. [Passage omitted]

We have created a genuinely effective government. It is thanks to the
effectiveness of the government, as demonstrated by the latest events,
that we can deal with any unexpected changes, tragedies and terrorist
acts and remain strong, so that we still stand firm on our own two
feet, so that we are not disorientated, so that we respond quickly
and appropriately. A country in our position has no other choice. We
are a country which has to reclaim the most attractive part of its
territory and which faces the strongest and most aggressive – perhaps
not the strongest but certainly the most aggressive – forces in the
world. They are resisting us. We are a country that has to carry out
titanic work, a country that, out of nowhere, has to find the strength
to solve a task that is almost impossible to solve. Without it, we will
be unable to continue with large-scale development. In order to solve
this task – [changes tack] Our main achievement is that Georgia has
learnt to be successful. We have learnt to protect this success and
we have learnt to fight to ensure a better future for our children. A
better future will be impossible without each of us working, looking
after the country and having a sense of responsibility for the future
of our country.

Good bless our motherland. Long live Georgia.

Kuwait for peaceful settlement of Karabakh conflict

PanArmenian News
Feb 8 2005

KUWAIT FOR PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF KARABAKH CONFLICT

08.02.2005 18:34

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Kuwait comes for peaceful settlement of the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict and will adhere to that position in international
structures, Kuwaiti Prime Minister, emir of Kuwait Sheik Sabah
al-Ahmad as-Sabah stated at a meeting with Armenian Parliament
Speaker Artur Baghdasarian. In the course of the meeting it was noted
that both countries come for peace in the region, do not have and did
not have any political, economic or any other differences, and it is
a good basis for development of relations both at the bilateral level
and within international structures. The proposal was supported by
the Kuwaiti Prime Minister. Sheik Sabah al-Ahmad as-Sabah accepted
the invitation to pay an official visit to Armenia. Concrete terms of
the visit will be specified in the future.

Little Turkish delight left

BBC News, UK
Feb 7 2005

European press review

[parts omitted]

Little Turkish delight left

With France’s ruling UMP party at odds with its most prominent member
– President Jacques Chirac – on the prospect of Turkey’s full EU
membership, Paris’s Le Monde ponders one of the contentious issues
raised during a visit to Turkey by a delegation led by the president
of the French parliament, Jean-Louis Debre.

The paper quotes Mr Debre as telling Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan that “Turkey’s attitude to the Armenian genocide” of 1915
“poses a real problem for France”.

To which Mr Erdogan replied, it notes, that he was “disappointed”
with Paris’s position” and “did not know that 400,000 (dead)
Armenians could decide the referendum” Paris intends to hold on
Ankara’s membership bid.

“Despite this lively exchange,” the paper adds, “Mr Debre believes he
‘may have done some useful work’ on the Armenian question, since the
Turkish authorities say they are willing to ‘consider’ a proposal to
give access to its archives to an international commission of
historians”.

Kevorkian gets out of prison for surgery

Kevorkian gets out of prison for surgery

Detroit Free Press
Friday, February 4, 2005

BY AMBER HUNT MARTIN, FREE PRESS STAFF WRITER

Dr. Jack Kevorkian finally is out of prison — if only for a few weeks.

Kevorkian, the infamous assisted-suicide doctor convicted of poisoning a
man on national television, left his prison cell Thursday to undergo
bilateral hernia surgery, his lawyer said.

Mayer Morganroth, Kevorkian’s Southfield attorney, said his client was
given 10 minutes’ notice early Thursday that he’d be leaving for the
surgery. Morganroth didn’t know whether Kevorkian would go under the
knife Thursday or today.

“I’m really concerned,” Morganroth said. “His health is quite poor.”

In addition to the hernia, Kevorkian reportedly has hepatitis C, high
blood pressure, arthritis, a heart murmur, circulatory problems and the
beginning stages of cataracts in his eyes.

;u=/krdetroit/20050204/lo_krdetroit/kevorkiangetsoutofprisonforsurgery

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp

Tbilisi: Lavrov’s forthcoming Georgia visit

The Messenger, Georgia
Feb 4 2005

Lavrov’s forthcoming Georgia visit

Many hope that Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergei Lavrov
scheduled visit to Tbilisi on February 18 will witness an improvement
in the much strained relations between Russia and Georgia, though
others are more skeptical and do not expect any breakthrough. Georgia
is the minister’s last stop on a South Caucasian tour and only after
he returns to Moscow will it be possible to speak about any possible
changes in Russia’s policy towards the Caucasus.

Lavrov’s tour in the Caucasus begins in Azerbaijan, where he will
discuss the prospects of bilateral relations, reformation of CIS
structures, the conflicts that exist in the Caucasus, particularly
Karabakh, and fighting against international terrorism and
transnational organized crime. In addition, a visit of Azerbaijani
President Ilham Aliev to Moscow is being planned for the end of
February.

Having good relations with Azerbaijan is very important for Russia.
Likewise, Ilham Aliev also tries to improve relations with Moscow.
Analysts are particularly interested to see what comes of the two
sides discussion regarding the Karabakh conflict. Russian support for
its traditional ally Armenia in this conflict helped to ensure its
victory, but it is speculated that Russia may demonstrate greater
support for Baku’s cause, perhaps as a result of alleged cooler
relations with Armenia.

Perhaps Moscow is trying to regulate the issue of Karabakh so that
both Armenia and Azerbaijan will be satisfied. But if this does
happen, analysts question what Moscow might benefit from brokering a
deal which would leave Armenia less dependent on Russia and more
flexible in terms of foreign policy.

Karabakh will not be the only topic on the agenda when Lavrov moves
on to Yerevan. There, as in Tbilisi, discussion of reopening the rail
route between Russia and Armenia, particularly after Azerbaijan
recently strengthened its blockade of Armenia so that cargo from
Azerbaijan cannot enter Georgia if it is ultimately destined for
Armenia, will dominate the agenda. The new Kavkaz-Poti ferry route is
unlikely to ease Armenia’s transportation problems much, and so
reopening the route remains of great importance.

But although Georgia has expressed readiness to consider the
rehabilitation of the Tbilisi-Sokhumi leg of the railway, there seems
little likelihood of this happening in the near future. The most
serious stumbling block is the Georgian government’s continuing
demands that Georgian refugees be allowed to return to Abkhazia
before any repairs can take place on the railway.

Resolving Georgia’s conflicts with Abkhazia and South Ossetia will
top the agenda of discussions in Tbilisi. The Georgian government
continues to complain of Russian hypocrisy with regard to the
conflicts – recognizing the territorial integrity of Georgia in word
but doing all it can to annex parts of the country in deed – and it
will hope that it can persuade to act on its statements and show
active support for the restoration of its territorial integrity.

However, despite Saakashvili’s Strasbourg proposals regarding the
peaceful resolution of the South Ossetian conflict, little is
expected to change in the situation, although some experts continue
to hope that behind-the-scenes negotiations may lead Moscow to change
its attitude towards Georgia. Lately, a large amount of Russian
capital has entered Georgia and in Strasbourg, during discussions
about Georgia, Russian representative displayed a surprisingly
constructive position with regard to Georgia.

In addition to the unregulated conflicts, a number of other problems
have also accumulated in Georgian-Russian relations. The issue of
Russian military base withdrawal has yet to move forward after years
of negotiations. Moscow demands 13 years for the process, but the
Georgian side regards that it will need less time. Without the
support of the West, however, this issue is unlikely to be resolved.

Some experts regard that the visa regime in place between the two
countries is more important than the issue of base withdrawal. This
regime makes it difficult for Georgian citizens to enter Russia and
as of this year, the price of a Russian visa has increased. At the
same time the Russian market is extremely important for Georgia.

Caspian oil will be one of the main issues of Lavrov’s tour in the
Caucasus. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline is set to begin
operation this year and the issue of transporting Azerbaijani gas to
Turkey and Iranian gas to Europe is also slated for discussion.
Georgia is vitally important in all of these issues.

The issue of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Tbilisi is
likely to be agreed upon during Lavrov’s visit. Putin was to visit
Georgia last year, but his trip was postponed. However, Putin may
visit Georgia in the near future to sign important documents; but
although the Russian-Georgian frame agreement is named among them, it
is difficult to imagine that such an agreement could be signed in the
current climate of hostility.

Azeri FM: “Occupied Azeri Territories” May Be Returned This Year

“OCCUPIED AZERI TERRITORIES” MAY BE RETURNED ALREADY THIS YEAR: AZERI FM

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 3. ARMINFO. Azeri FM Elmar Mamedyarov says that the
“occupied Azeri territories” may be returned already this year,
reports the Trend news agency.

This requires political and good will only, says Mamedyarov noting
that any solution to the Karabakh conflict will comply with
Azerbaijan’s national legislation as “nagorny Karabakh is part of
Azerbaijan’s territory.” Mamedyarov says that Azerbaijan will continue
its efforts to settle the conflict peacefully. He refuses to make
public Azerbaijan’s proposals at his Mar 2 Prague meeting with
Armenia’s FM Vardan Oskanyan.

Russia, OSCE should work out common approcahes to settlements

RIA Novosti, Russia
Feb 1, 2005

RUSSIA, OSCE SHOULD WORK OUT COMMON APPROACHES TO SETTLEMENT OF
REGIONAL AND LOCAL CONFLICTS

MOSCOW, February 1 (RIA Novosti) – Russia and the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) should work out common
approaches to settlement of local and regional conflicts, head of the
State Duma international committee Konstantin Kosachev said during
the meeting with OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Slovenian Foreign Minister
Dimitrij Rupel on Tuesday.

According to the Russian parliamentarian, unfortunately, “we often
face the use of double standards in the settlement of some conflicts
(Georgian-Abkhaz or Nagorny Karabakh)”. However, Mr. Kosachev is
convinced that this problem will be solved in the near future.

In his words, Russia is not interested in the OSCE weakening and loss
of its universal status. The OSCE “should find its unique place in
the system of European organizations to become maximally effective
and important.” He stressed. Undoubtedly, Russia supports the OSCE
reform aimed at the organization’s development into a key
pan-European structure.

Konstantin Kosachev believes that another important task is to work
out common criteria and standards of elections on the OSCE territory
with account for national and historic features of each country.

Girls’ ordeal should never be repeated

Las Vegas Sun, NV
Jan 31 2005

Editorial: Girls’ ordeal should never be repeated

The injustice was apparent the moment Emma and Mariam Sarkisian were
taken from their family in Las Vegas and placed in a federal holding
cell in Los Angeles. Emma, 18, is a recent graduate of Palo Verde
High School and Miriam, 17, is still a student there. Immigration
authorities learned last July that the two had no legal status to be
in this country. After receiving word that Armenia, the girls’
country of birth, would accept them, officials on Jan. 14 abruptly
took them to Los Angeles and prepared to deport them.

We were among many people and organizations calling upon the federal
government to use discretion in this case. The girls were brought to
this country by their father when they were 4 and 3. This is the only
country they’ve ever known. Immigration law is not so strict that
discretion cannot be used when warranted. As we saw it, how in the
name of justice could two girls be torn from their American home and
dropped, penniless, into a country whose customs and language are
alien to them, and where they have no family, friends or jobs
awaiting?

Twice the girls were minutes away from being boarded onto a flight,
and only fortuitous circumstances — including one day when the plane
was full — prevented their departure. With publicity and appeals
from the public growing, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.,
intervened on the girls’ behalf. He called Homeland Security Director
Tom Ridge, whose department oversees immigration services. After two
weeks in custody, the girls were released and they rejoined their
family on Friday. Their case is still under review, but it’s likely
now that they will be able to remain here and eventually gain
citizenship. “In the end, common sense and good people — they
prevail in America,” said the girls’ overjoyed father.

This is a quote that should be posted in block letters in all
immigration offices. Occasionally a case will come along such as this
one, where strict enforcement of the law would result in an obvious
injustice. There should be a review procedure for such cases, so that
justice doesn’t hinge on the timing of a well-placed phone call.

Chess: Sasikiran stunned by Gabriel Sargissen

Rediff, India
Jan 30 2004

Sasikiran stunned by Gabriel Sargissen

January 31, 2005 21:23 IST

Overnight joint-leader Grandmaster Krishnan Sasikiran slipped to
joint 10th spot after a shocking defeat at the hands of GM Gabriel
Sargissen of Armenia in the sixth round of the master’s section in
the Gibtele.Com chess festival in Gibraltar.

With four rounds still to come in the event, Sargissen emerged the
sole leader with five points. He is followed by top seed Alexei
Shirov of Spain, Hikaru Nakamura of the United States, Kiril Georgiev
of Bulgaria, Levon Aronian of Armenia, Alexey dreev of Russia, Zahar
Efimenko of Ukraine, Vasilios Kotronias of Greece and the Israeli duo
of Emil Sutovsky and Boris Avrukh, who all have 4.5 points apiece.

Sasikiran is next in line with four points and giving him company
among others are Ian Rogers of Australia, Alexander Areshcheko of
Ukraine and Kevin Spraggett of Canada.

The highest-rated Indian after Viswanathan Anand will meet Sweidish
GM Pia Cramling in the next round and a victory there can still put
Sasikiran back in the race for the title.

Sasikiran was a little over-ambitious in the middle game against
Sargissen. Playing the Neo-Grunfeld opening as black, Sasikiran had a
balanced position in the middle game and he tried to create imbalance
with quite original planning and it was on the 28th move that the
game took a decisive turn as Sargissen went ahead with complications,
accepting a temporary pawn sacrifice by his opponent.

Sasikiran had optical advantage for some time during the game when he
found fine attacking manoeuvres to leave Sargissen in trouble.

However, as the position simplified, Sargissen emerged on top as
Sasikiran was subjected to a typical case of divided forces, with
little co-ordination. Sasikiran still gave a tough fight but the dye
was already cast. The game lasted 64 moves.

Interestingly, apart from Sargissen, Greek Vasilios Kotronias was the
only winner on the top 10 boards while all the remaining games ended
in draws.

Kotronias defeated Bragi Thorfinnsson of Iceland in a fine positional
game arising out of a Sicilian defence.

Kotronias got a vice-like grip right after the opening and consistent
play thereafter netted him the full point after 37 moves.

It was a tame affair on the top board as former World junior champion
Kiril Georgiev of Bulgaria played it safe against
Latvian-born-Spaniard Alexei Shirov. Playing just too safe against
the Slav, Georgiev employed a tested variation and had no troubles in
maintaining the balance in this 30-move encounter.

United States’ champion Hikaru Nakamura drew with Levon Aronian of
Armenia in an interesting game. Playing white, Nakamura accepted the
Marshall gambit and then showed resourceful play in the middle game
to come out a little better. However, Aronian was quite up to the
task in defence and after tactical manoeuvring, ensured the draw.

In other important games of the day, Alexei Dreev was held to a draw
by Avrukh while Emil Sutovsky had to share the point with Efimenko.

Important results round 6:

Kiril Georgiev (Bul, 4.5) drew with Alexei Shirov (Esp, 4.5); Alexey
Dreev (Rus, 4.5) drew with Boris Avrukh (Isr, 4.5); Hikaru Nakamura
(Usa, 4.5) drew with Levon Aronian (Arm, 4.5); Emil Sutovsky (Isr,
4.5) drew with Zahar Efimenko (Ukr, 4.5); Gabriel Sargissen (Arm, 5)
beat Krishnan Sasikiran (Ind, 4); Pia Cramling (Swe, 4) drew with Ian
Rogers (Aus, 4); Kevin Spraggett (Can, 4) drew with Colin Mcnab (Sco,
4); Vasilios Kotronias (Gre, 4.5) beat Bragi Thorfinnssson (Isl,
3.5); Evgeny Postny (Isr, 4) drew with Hamad Al-Tamimi (Qat, 4); A.
R. Saleh Jasim (Uae, 4) drew with Jonathan Speelman (Eng, 4);
Kateryna Lahno (Ukr, 4) drew with Peter Wells (Eng, 4); Stefan
Kristjansson (Isl, 3.5) drew with Mohamed Al Sayed (Qat, 4); Joanna
Dworakowska (Pol, 3) lost to Alexander Areshchenko (Ukr, 4); Juan
Manuel Bellon Lopez (Esp, 3) lost to Hicham Hamdouchi (Mar, 4);
Sergey Erenburg (Isr, 3.5) drew with Richard Pert (Eng, 3.5); Mark
Hebden (Eng, 3) lost to Sergio Estremera (Esp, 4); Gabriel Del Rio
(Esp, 4) beat Bjorn Thorfinnsson (Isl, 3).