Armenia May Need Additional 1bln AMD For Employment Programs

ARMENIA MAY NEED ADDITIONAL 1BLN AMD FOR EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS

ARKA
Apr 15, 2009

YEREVAN, April 15. /ARKA/. According to a preliminary estimate of
the RA Ministry of Labor and Social Security, Armenia may need an
additional 0.5-1bln AMD for employment programs.

Minister Arsen Hambartsumyan reported that a total of 4.2bln AMD
have been budgeted in Armenia for this purpose this year – 13.8%
more than last year.

"This April 17,663 people are on the dole against the budgeted 14,500,
and an uptrend can be observed," Hambarstumyan stated at the conference
on a social impact of the global economic crisis.

He pointed out that 17,663 people received unemployment benefits
during the first few days of this month against 16,700 this January.

"The benefit is equal to 60% of the minimum wage rate – 18,000 AMD,
against 15,000 AMD last year and 12,000 AMD in 2007. The average term
of payment of unemployment benefits is ten months," Hambartsumyan said.

He also pointed out that 6.8% unemployment was registered in Armenia
early this April against 6.3% this January.

"The trends arouse some concern because the number of jobseekers
reached 99,000 early this April against 90,200 this January. According
to the on-line information, the number of unemployed reached 78,700
this April – 4,000 more as compared with this January," the Minister
said.

He pointed out that 2,061 jobseekers were employed in th e 1st quarter
of this year – an increase of 13.7% as compared with the corresponding
period last year.

Hambartsumyan added that 20% of the jobseekers are young people. Women
and young people constitute 72% and 18.9% of unemployed respectively.

The Minister reported that a computer program aimed to enhance the
labor market management was installed at all the regional employment
agencies in Armenia.

"The system is designed for prompt processing of the statistical data
on the labor market to enhance the efficiency of the work," he said.

Hambartsumyan also listed the measures under the employment program:
a short-term analysis on the labor market, enhancing the efficiency
of government programs, selecting the majors and fields in the context
of the global crisis, elaborating and developing new initiatives.

BEIRUT: Geagea Meets A Ramgavar Delegation In Maarab

GEAGEA MEETS A RAMGAVAR DELEGATION IN MAARAB

iLoubnan.info
April 15 2009
Lebanon

BEIRUT – Lebanese Forces leader Samir Geagea met on Wednesday with
a delegation from the Ramgavar party headed by MP Hagop Kassarjian,
Ramgavar leader Odyss Dakssian, the leader’s deputy, Wiscan Jamknoyan,
and the party’s secretary, Herar Hovivian.

Geagea discussed with the delegation the general domestic situation,
the upcoming parliamentary elections and the importance of cooperation
in the March 14 alliance.

The Armenian delegation on the other hand, confirmed to Geagea that
it was "committed to the decision of the Armenian forces in March 14."

Civilization And Mosques

CIVILIZATION AND MOSQUES
By Mordechai Nisan

American Thinker
on_and_mosques.html
April 14 2009

It is late in the global game of confrontation with Islamic Jihad. The
lines of conflict have been drawn and the ground-rules for Muslim
victory are in place. Yet many among the targeted governments and
peoples have yet been incapable or unwilling to identify the enemy,
at the gates and within the walls.

Now the entire globe is Islam’s religious ambition and field of
conquest. Bombings and attacks in New York and London, Madrid and
Moscow, Bali and Mumbai, Jerusalem and Balsan, are not isolated
or discrete instances of local theatre low-intensive assaults, but
components of a pattern of coordinated and executed warfare of a very
singular kind.

Mentioning Bali and Istanbul, and adding Casablanca and Aden, Sinai
and Tizi Ouzou, contributes confusion and paralysis to the policy
equation in the West. Why would Muslim terrorists carry out violent
attacks in Muslim countries and against fellow-Muslims?

For Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin-Laden and his second-in-command Ayman
al-Zawahiri, not only infidel countries like Hindu India, Jewish
Israel, and the Christian Philippines, constitute legitimate prey and
victims, but Muslim-ruled countries as well. Theologian Ibn Taimiyya
(d. 1328) defined Muslim-governed societies not conforming to Islamic
law and tradition as ignominiously reflecting the pre-Islamic jahaliyya
period of history – thus the legitimate target of Islamic subversion
and overthrow.

Islam’s Will to Power

In confronting Islamic terrorism, governments around the
world and specifically under the leadership of the United
States have concentrated on the improvement of relevant security
apparatuses. Although intelligence surveillance has enhanced domestic
security with preventive arrests and early-warnings of imminent attack,
such measures cannot eliminate a threat whose origin and rationale are
not especially those of weaponry, battalions, and conventional warfare.

The manual of Islamic jihad is canonized in the sacred Koran. The
believers, and only Muslims are dignified by the term mumin’in
(believers), are enlisted to go ‘in the way of Allah’ and
fight and kill the enemies of Islam. The Koran opens with the
exordium declaration that God is compassionate and merciful,
but He is eminently cruel against those who reject Him and His
messenger-prophet Muhammad. With piercing insight Frithjof Schuon
elucidated three essential and successive principles of Islam:
Truth-Victory-Generosity. The genius of Islam and that of the Arab
race converge, he wrote, as the collective embodiment of the soul
of Mohammad.[i]

Islam is not a private spiritual experience but a public campaign
of conquest, colonization, and conversion. In the Muslim East,
governments and mobs persecute, outlaw, and hound the Christian
faith and faithful. Christians flee in fear from Iraq and Egypt, and
churches are closed down in Algeria. Christianity is prohibited in
Riyadh – Saudi convert Hamoud Bin Saleh was reported arrested in early
2009. Christianity is dwindling in the East: consider holy Bethlehem,
Aleppo in Syria and Tripoli in Lebanon – while Islam flourishes in
the West.

The Mosque

The mosque is the locus of religious faith and jihadic
indoctrination. It is a place of prayer that serves as the barracks
for gathering the soldiers. In the early days of Islam the mosque was
a center for forging military preparedness, awaiting the spiritual
command to go out and fight the enemy. The Muslims would line up in
prayer "as in a battle formation."[ii] Mosques serve, as defined
by Samuel Huntington in his book Who Are We?, ‘as a base and a
cover’.[iii]

Tawfiq Hamid, an Egyptian doctor, related his nightmarish experience
as a former believing Muslim fanatic. He recalled how the local imam
positioned the believers tightly together in their prayer positions,
assuring close contact, while teaching that ‘God loves those who
fight for Him as a solid wall’.[iv]

In the mosque a niche (mihrab) in one wall indicates the direction of
prayer toward the holy city of Mecca. Appropriately, Saudi Arabia as
the sacred keeper of Islam’s most sacred site is today one of the great
promoters of jihad and Islam around the world. It is to Arabia that
Muslims world-wide face five-prayer times daily, looking for religious
inspiration and financial sustenance to continue their global struggle.

The history of Muslim warfare was traditionally crowned with
mosque-construction in lands conquered and occupied in the name
of Islam. Atop the Temple Mount in Jerusalem the new rulers adorned
aggression with a cultural symbol and built the Aqsa Mosque in 705. In
late September 2000, the Palestinians launched their Al Aqsa Intifada
against Israel, ending their rabble-rousing Friday public prayer in
the Aqsa mosque by raining rocks on Jews praying below the Mount at
the Western Wall.

A yet more arrogant practice was to either destroy churches, in
Nazareth in 661, or to transform existing churches into mosques,
in Damascus in 637 and the Greek Orthodox Church of Hagio Sophia in
Constantinople (renamed Istanbul) in 1453. When the Muslims seized
Hebron in 637, they desecrated while redesigning the Cave of the
Patriarchs into the Ibrahim Mosque. A notorious Muslim practice in
the theatre of warfare was to massacre Christians in their churches:
Armenians in Nakhjavan in 705, Greeks in Thessaloniki in 904, and
Lebanese in Ayshiyyah in 1976.[v]

Muslims build hundreds of mosques, madrasa schools, and cultural
centers throughout Western countries. Some have come to recognize
the insidious danger, sensing that the Muslim goal is power and
not freedom, conquest and not integration. Congressman Peter King
(R-NY), former Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee,
publicly stated that ‘Unfortunately, we have too many mosques in this
country’. Meanwhile, it was reported in January 2009 that the FBI
was using planted agents to conduct surveillance in mosques in America.

The case of the Islamic Society of Boston, in constructing the
largest mosque in New England, was revelatory of the infiltration
strategy. The mosque project had proven links with the Texas-based Holy
Land Foundation, known to fund Islamic terrorism, specifically the
Palestinian Hamas movement. Moreover, the Boston mosque is connected
through the Muslim American Society with the powerful Egyptian-based
Muslim Brotherhood whose definitive goal in America is, as defined in
a document from late 2008, "Grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying
Western Civilization from within."[vi]

A revelatory connection between mosque and jihad characterized Hamas
practices in the Gaza Strip. When Israel initiated its military
operation in late December 2008, its air force bombed the Gazan
neighborhood Tel el-Hawwa mosque, and other mosques in Jabaliyya, which
served as secret storehouses and launching pads for Qassam rockets and
Grad missiles fired by Palestinians against Israeli civilian targets.

Jihad And America

Jihad is a stimulating and turbulent myth, while the mosque offers
a space for mental transcendence, a headquarters for mobilization,
a vision of conquest.

The muezzin call to prayer in Detroit and Manhattan, where mosques
are disingenuously named ‘Islamic Centers’, is a manifest violation of
public space and private comfort for many. Muslims are determined to
set the social rules by segregating classrooms, gyms, and swimming
pools; promoting Muslim prayer in public schools; probing social
resistance with women’s head-covering scarves and non-alcoholic
taxis; and enticing conversion through out-reach programs in prisons,
religious discussions in mosques, and extensive internet missionary
propaganda. For the Koran categorically states (3:18): "The only true
faith in God’s sight is Islam."

In America, the Muslim goal is not to earn acceptance but to acquire
ascendancy in the mosaic of society. Omar M. Ahmed, former chairman
of the Council for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), told a crowd
of California Muslims in July 1998 (though he later denied this)
that ‘Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to
become dominant’.

For Italian philosopher-novelist Umberto Eco, writing a month after
the 9/11 trauma, the freedom of religion was a sacrosanct principle. He
wrote about the West with these words: "We are a pluralist civilization
because we allow mosques to be built in our countries, and we are not
going to stop simply because Christian missionaries are thrown into
prison in Kabul. If we did so, we too would become Taliban."[vii]
And he hoped that, if we allow mosques in our countries, then one
day there will be Christian churches in their countries – or at least
Buddhas won’t be blown up.

America Disarmed

Islam, engaging in archaic religious warfare, is committed to change
the political order by a sweeping and fundamental transformation
of society, culture, and morality. Rules and restrictions as in
Saudi Arabia would strangle America; personal and public morality
– concerning men and women – would be chiseled into form by the
likes of Iranian ayatollahs and Egyptian muftis, though they speak
American home-grown English. The individual happiness principle –
just holding hands at the amusement park – would be smothered; and
the intoxicating fragrance of individuality and creativity would be
crushed in Islamic America.

The Muslim replacement strategy for America is on track. It took a
few centuries following the death of Muhammad until Zoroastrian Iran
and Byzantine Egypt overwhelmingly Islamicized. Even if it takes
one or two hundred years, the final triumph is considered by the
believers in Tehran and Cairo, but also in Houston and Minneapolis,
a historical certainty. Veiling their intentions and women, the Muslim
conquest advances.

Indeed, the method of indefatigable religious propaganda, rather
than terrorism, is what can assure Islam’s ultimate success. CAIR
spokesman Ibrahim Hooper admitted in a 1993 interview that he wants
to see America become a Muslim country; not by violence, he admitted,
but ‘through education’.[viii]

In the end, who will be blamed for the cataclysm? Politicians who
failed their constituents, the media who misconstrued the victim,
clerics who preached dialogue rather than disclosure, intellectuals
who betrayed national values; and those who stood by watching the
exploitation of democracy rather than guarding its inner poise,
its light and sweetness, for the free and brave people of America.

Dr. Mordechai Nisan resides in Jerusalem and lectures on Middle East
history and politics. Email contact

—————————————– —————————————

[i] Frithjof Schuon, Dimensions of Islam, London: George Allen &
Unwin, 1970, p. 15.

[ii] Khalid Yayha Blankinship, The End of the Jihad State: The Reign
of Hisham Ibn ‘Abd al-Malik and the Collapse of the Umayyads, Albany:
State University of New York Press, 1994, p. 15.

[iii] Samuel P. Huntington, Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s
National Identity, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2004, p. 363.

[iv] James G. Zumwalt, "Dead Man Talking," The Washington Times,
August 4, 2007.

[v] See Andrew G. Bostom, ed., The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War
and the Fate of Non-Muslims, Amherst, N.Y.: Prometeus Books, 2005.

[vi] Immediate Release, "Citizens for Peace and Tolerance," Boston,
December 3, 2008.

[vii] Umberto Eco, "The Roots of Conflict," Guardian Unlimited,
October 13, 2001.

[viii] Art Moore, "Did CAIR founder say Islam to Rule
America?" WorldNetDaily.com, December 11, 2006.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/04/civilizati

ANCA Endowment Fund Responds To Crew Allegations

ANCA ENDOWMENT FUND RESPONDS TO CREW ALLEGATIONS

e=41440_4/13/2009_1
Monday, April 13, 2009

WASHINGTON–The ANCA Endowment Fund Monday released the following
statement to its donors and the general public regarding ill-informed,
unsubstantiated, and incorrect allegations made in a press release
earlier this year by a privately funded non-governmental organization,
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

Below is the statement:

The ANCA Endowment Fund, Inc. would like to address allegations
recently raised against it by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in
Washington (CREW) a purported citizens’ watchdog organization based in
Washington, D.C. Specifically, CREW has accused the ANCA Endowment Fund
of having "indirectly participated in countless candidate endorsements"
that were made by the ANCA Endowment Fund’s affiliated 501(c) (4)
organization, the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) The
only basis for CREW’s accusation is that the ANCA Endowment Fund and
the ANCA occupy the same address and share certain common directors,
and that the ANCA Endowment Fund made grant contributions to the ANCA
totaling $200,000 in 2005 and 2006.

The ANCA Endowment Fund is quite disappointed that CREW has accused
the ANCA Endowment Fund of engaging in prohibited political activity
based on incomplete and misleading information. It is more than curious
that its baseless attacks were made just prior to renewed efforts by
the ANCA to advance Congressional and Presidential acknowledgement
of the Armenian Genocide.

As a fundamental, threshold matter, the ANCA Endowment Fund does
not and has not ever endorsed candidates or engaged in political
campaign activity, whether directly or indirectly. The fact that the
ANCA Endowment Fund and the ANCA occupy the same address and share
certain common directors is neither proscribed under IRS rules nor
sufficient under the law to attribute to the ANCA Endowment Fund the
political activities of the ANCA or to threaten the ANCA Endowment
Fund’s tax-exempt status.

On the contrary, it has been a longstanding position of the IRS and
of the U.S. Supreme Court that a 501(c)(3) organization’s tax-exempt
status is not jeopardized simply by being affiliated with a 501(c)(4)
organization engaged in political activity that would be improper for
the 501(c)(3) to engage in itself. This is true even if the 501(c)(3)
occupies the same office space and shares the same directors as
the 501(c)(4). What is important is not where the organizations are
located or how many of their directors are common, but whether they
have observed their separate corporate formalities and dealt with each
other at arm’s length. There should be no legitimate dispute that the
ANCA Endowment Fund and the ANCA have done so here, as demonstrated
by the following relevant facts:

* the ANCA Endowment Fund is (and always has been) separately organized
and incorporated from the ANCA;

* the ANCA Endowment Fund maintains its own records and bank accounts
separate and apart from those of the ANCA; funds of each organization
have always been segregated from each other and properly accounted for;
* the ANCA Endowment Fund owns the building located at 1711 N Street,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 at which its offices are maintained;

* the ANCA Endowment Fund rents office space within that 1711 N Street
building to various other organizations, of which only one is the ANCA,
and does so at market rates for all of its tenants; and

* the ANCA Endowment Fund and the ANCA pay for their own share
of common costs, which are allocated to each in proportionately
appropriate amounts.

In short, the ANCA Endowment Fund and the ANCA have consistently
observed their own corporate formalities and dealt with each other
at arms’ length. We believe this fact pattern leaves no basis for
the ANCA Endowment Fund’s tax-exempt status to be threatened merely
because it has some overlapping directors and the same address as the
ANCA. Had CREW had the courtesy to inquire about the actual facts,
it would have readily been able to ascertain that its allegations
were baseless. Perhaps it did not want to be burdened by the facts.

As for CREW’s other complaint that the ANCA Endowment Fund made
grants to the ANCA totaling $200,000 in 2005 and 2006, we believe
that complaint is similarly misguided. There is no prohibition on the
ANCA Endowment Fund’s making grants to the ANCA for proper purposes,
and no group or individual has come forward with any specific example
of any grant by the ANCA Endowment Fund to the ANCA made for any
allegedly improper purpose.

By contrast, we at the ANCA Endowment Fund stand firmly behind our
2005 and 2006 grants to the ANCA, which were made principally to
fund the ANCA’s Capital Gateway Program, which is designed to promote
the participation of qualified Armenians in national civic affairs,
a purpose entirely consistent with 501(c)(3) activity.

We hope that this information addresses any concerns you may have had
arising from the recent CREW allegations, and that it reaffirms your
confidence in us.

As always, we thank you for your continued support of the ANCA
Endowment Fund.

www.asbarez.com/index.html?showarticl

Karabakh Conflict Not Linked To Armenian-Turkish Reconciliation

KARABAKH CONFLICT NOT LINKED TO ARMENIAN-TURKISH RECONCILIATION

PanARMENIAN.Net
14.04.2009 15:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict is not
linked directly to normalization of the Armenian-Turkish relations
but progress in Karabakh talks can be positive for the process,
research director of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Svante
Cornell told PanARMENIAN.Net.

"The process of normalization of relations is supported by governments
of the two states and by Obama administration," he said.

Not In Our Name

NOT IN OUR NAME
By David Harsanyi

Denver Post

April 10 2009
CO

The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam . . .,"
President Barack Obama explained to the Turkish parliament on his
recent tour of Europe, emphasizing the need for "mutual respect"
between our cultures.

"War" and "respect" are two distinct ideas. Both ought to be meted
out judiciously. But let’s reserve the former as a last resort and
the latter to those who actually deserve it.

When Obama bowed to Saudi Arabian "King" Abdullah last week (sadly
reminiscent of W.’s insufferable hand holding with a Saudi prince)
he probably thought it an appropriate level of deference. The problem
is the wrong person was prostrate.

Why should we "respect" the Saudis? Is it the corporal punishment and
amputations? Is it the lack of free speech? Is it a judicial system
where women are often forbidden from testifying as they are incapable
of "understanding what they observe"? Or is it that victims of sexual
assault are prosecuted for the crime of being in the presence of
an unknown male? The honor killings? The forced circumcisions? The
terrorist funding?

Though we need not parachute Marines into Mecca to remedy that nation’s
historical and moral sickness, we should never be expected to "respect"
gangsters, either.

Why so many on the left are willing to extend tolerance toward those
who are militantly illiberal has always been a mystery. Many of these
countries wage internal wars to exterminate Christianity and Judaism
(in some cases religions that existed in those places long before
Islam) and the concepts of secularism and atheism live only in fantasy.

It’s not only fanatics holed up in the caves of Pakistan, it’s also
the majority of Islamic nations that on some level disregard basic
human rights.

And instead of "respecting" Turkey, Obama might have taken the time
to live up to his campaign promise to acknowledge the Turkish genocide
of 1.5 million Christian Armenians in the last century. He hasn’t.

In Iraq — a country propped up by American lives and generosity —
The New York Times reported that in 2005, the most influential Shiite
cleric in Iraq, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, issued a religious
decree declaring that gay men and women should be "punished, in fact,
killed." But that wasn’t enough. Gays, he decreed, "should be killed
in the worst, most severe way of killing." The Iraqi government looks
the other way.

Even our "moderate" allies like Egypt — a country which subsists
on $6 billion in U.S. bribes not to wage war on its neighbor —
regularly imprison political dissidents, execute sexual "deviants"
and run state-funded television shows that would give Nazis pause.

Hey, I guess, Egypt is "moderate" — compared to Sudan.

Our nation should not be in the business of imposing our values on
other cultures. We can’t. Not only do our values diverge, they are most
often antithetical. And let’s never pretend there is anything "mutual"
about a call for respect. The deep and fanatical hatred of America
flourished decades before the Iraq war or George W. Bush. Islamic
leaders have long blamed their own societal corrosion on the West.

Obama promised to transform American foreign policy. He was elected to
do so. So he used his first chance to make an impression as president
by apologizing for imaginary crimes against Islam and employing a
tone of subservience rather than defending our principles.

Not surprisingly, the more "thoughtful" among us immediately embraced
the president’s self-flagellation in front of some of the world’s
worst offenders of human rights as a constructive approach. As a
geopolitical ploy . . . well, we’ll see what happens.

But there is undoubtedly nothing thoughtful about offering a false
choice. To wage war or to offer respect? We can avoid both. We should.

E-mail David Harsanyi at [email protected].

http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12110521

This Won’t Help The Armenian Genocide Bill

THIS WON’T HELP THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE BILL
By Mike Lillis

The Washington Independent
/this-wont-help-the-armenian-genocide-bill
April 10 2009

Former wrestling coach and House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) will
lobby on behalf of Turkey as part of a $35,000 per month contract with
his K Street firm, Dickstein Shapiro, The Hill reported this afternoon.

The agreement is a subcontract between Hastert’s firm and the Gephardt
Group, founded by Richard Gephardt, the ex-Missouri congressman who
was the Democratic House leader for several years. Gephardt and others
at DLA Piper replaced the Livingston Group, longtime lobbyists for
Turkey, as their Washington representatives last year.

For several years, Congress has been embroiled in debate over a
resolution to label as genocide the WWI-era killing of an estimated
1.5 million Armenians at the hands of Turkish soldiers. The House
Foreign Affairs Committee passed the resolution in 2007, but Speaker
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) never brought it to the floor out of concern
that the contentious measure, though non-binding in every way, would
alienate a strategic ally in the midst of a war with neighboring Iraq.

Hastert, who served as speaker longer than any Republican in
congressional history, just made passage of that resolution even
harder.

http://washingtonindependent.com/38298

Is Violent Behaviour Resulted By Mental Disorder?

IS VIOLENT BEHAVIOUR RESULTED BY MENTAL DISORDER?

A1+
03:41 pm | April 10, 2009

Politics

Pre-trial detainee Shant Harutyunyan is said to be subject to coercion
and psychological torture in prison. The press secretary of the
Justice Ministry’s Penitentiary Department refutes the information
saying it is unfounded.

The information was disseminated by the Committee for the Protection
of Political Prisoners. "Shant Harutyunyan has been isolated for no
reason. He is forbidden to see his relatives or talk to them on the
phone," said the Committee.

Presently, Shant is undergoing a forensic psychological examination
and encounters no restrictions concerning public utilities. As for
the Committee’s statement regarding Shant Harutyunyan it is a mere
slander, for "before being transferred to the Nubarashen clinic, Shant
Harutyunyan had met his spouse, sister, representatives of the Human
Rights Ombudsman, human rights organizations and parliamentarians,"
said the Department press secretary Arsen Babayan.

He added that the public had been informed of Shant Harutyunyan’s
isolation. On March 7 the Department issued a statement saying:
"As it was almost impossible to call Shant Harutyunyan to a
medical examination, and taking into consideration the fact that
the arrestee’s violent behaviour may have been resulted by mental
insanity, the medical comment said that that arrestee must be isolate
and round-the-clock control must be established over him."

Arsen Babayan considered necessary to remind that Shant Harutyunyan
had attempted to burn a pillow in the ward and made aggressive steps
which might be resulted by the mental disorder.

According to the Committee for the Protection of Political Prisoners,
"Shant Harutyunyan has been isolated in the Nubarashen clinic since
March 7 and even the relatives are denied access to him. We possess
no information on Shant’s health state."

Note that the Law on Mental Health Service says that people with
mental disorders have a right to carry on a correspondence, use a
telephone and receive visitors, etc.

Serzh Sargsyan: Genocide Happened And No Armenian Doubts It

SERZH SARGSYAN: GENOCIDE HAPPENED AND NO ARMENIAN DOUBTS IT

Panorama.am
11:15 10/04/2009

The President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan says it is quite possible that
the closed Armenian-Turkish border will be opened. In his interview
given to Russian "Vesti", the President answered to the reporter’s
question regarding the opening of the Armenian-Turkish border:
"I think it is possible.

As you know historic facts ties us with the Turkish people. Every
Armenian in the world has no doubts regarding the Genocide. Everybody
is sure. But the Turkish people and the Turkish authorities reject
that fact.

Irrespective of that fact we have taken the initiative and offered
them to set diplomatic relations without any conditions, to open
the border, and after, to create an inter-state committee to discuss
various question. As you know I have invited the President of Turkey
Mr. Gul to Yerevan and he has accepted my invitation. We have passed
a difficult but much learning path of negotiations and we are getting
closer to the finish. I hope that when I leave for Turkey to watch
the football match of Armenia-Turkey national teams the border will
be also open or it will be the eve of that. If I am not mistaken the
football match is dated on 7 October."

Osce Mission Conducted Monitoring In Contact Line Of Nagorno Karabak

OSCE MISSION CONDUCTED MONITORING IN CONTACT LINE OF NAGORNO KARABAKH-AZERBAIJAN

Panorama.am
17:11 08/04/2009

The OSCE Mission has conducted a monitoring in the Contact Line of
Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan armed forces, the press service of the
NKR Foreign Ministry reports. According to the source the monitoring
from the NKR territory has been conducted by the Coordinator of the
OSCE Office Imre Palatinus (Hungary), the assistants of the Special
Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Vladimir Chuntulov
(Bulgaria) and Jaslan Nourtazin (Kazakhstan). During the monitoring the
armistice has not been violated. According to the source Azerbaijani
party has not accompanied the mission members to the front line;
hence they have conducted the monitoring from the distance.