Armenia And Iran To Launch Construction Of Oil Pipeline In 2009

ARMENIA AND IRAN TO LAUNCH CONSTRUCTION OF OIL PIPELINE IN 2009

ArmInfo
2008-12-17 13:27:00

ArmInfo. Armenia and Iran will launch construction of oil pipeline
from Iranian Tabriz to the Armenian Yeraskh, Armenian Minister of
Energy and Natural Resources Armen Movsisyan told Iranian Foreign
Minister Manouchehr Mottaki Tuesday in Tehran, Armenian Public
Television reported.

Thus, Minister Movsisyan said petroleum and diesel will be delivered
from the oil processing plant in Tabriz to Armenia via the oil
pipeline. He said the opening of Armenian Consulate in Tabriz will
boost the cooperation of the two countries’ businessmen. The sides
discussed joint projects on construction of a hydro power plant on
the River of Araz, a third power line Iran-Armenia and the possibility
of Iran gas supply to Armenia.

‘Tehran supports the construction of oil and gas pipelines as well as
power stations and dams. We welcome any projects aimed at extension of
the cooperation’, Manoucherh Mottaki said. Earlier Armen Movsisyan said
that an oil processing plant with 7 million tons of annual capacity
was to be built in Yeraskh with participation of Armenia, Iran and
Russia. However, later Russia recognized that project marginal for
lack of relevant sales markets.

Armenian Christmas Services At St. Vartan Cathedral

PRESS RELEASE
PRESS OFFICE
Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern)
630 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Tel: (212)-686-0710
Fax: (212)-689-1934

December 17, 2008

ARMENIAN CHRISTMAS SERVICES AT ST. VARTAN CATHEDRAL TO TAKE PLACE ON
TUESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2009

The Nativity and Baptism of Jesus Christ will be observed at New York’s St.
Vartan Armenian Cathedral on Monday and Tuesday, January 5 and 6, 2009. A
special liturgical schedule will be in effect for these "Armenian Christmas"
services; please make a note of the times.

On ARMENIAN CHRISTMAS EVE — Monday, January 5 — there will be an Evening
Service with Scripture Readings (by students from the Diocese’s Khrimian
Lyceum) at 6:30 p.m. The Divine Liturgy will immediately follow, beginning
at 7:30 p.m., celebrated by His Eminence Archbishop Yeghishe Gizirian.

The St. Vartan Cathedral Choir — with the participation of students from
the Diocese’s Khrimian Lyceum, and from area Diocesan Armenian Saturday
schools — will sing the Divine Liturgy, under the direction of the Maestro
Khoren Mekanejian. A reception will take place following the services.

On ARMENIAN CHRISTMAS MORNING — Tuesday, January 6 — His Eminence
Archbishop Khajag Barsamian, Primate of the Diocese of the Armenian Church
of America (Eastern), will celebrate the Divine Liturgy. The Morning
Service begins at 9:30 a.m., and the Divine Liturgy follows at 10:30 a.m.

The sacred music will be sung by the St. Vartan Cathedral Choir, under the
direction of Maestro Mekanejian.

According to Armenian tradition, this feast day commemorates not only the
birth of Christ, but also His baptism by John the Baptist. The latter is
remembered through the "BLESSING OF WATER" ceremony, which will follow the
Divine Liturgy. Mr. Levon Temiz will serve as "godfather" of the Blessing
of Water service.

After the cathedral’s January 6 church services, a HOME BLESSING SERVICE AND
CHRISTMAS RECEPTION will take place in Haik and Alice Kavookjian Auditorium.
The reception is open to all; admission is free.

Armenian Christmas will also be observed at local parishes across the
Eastern Diocese. Please contact your local parish to ascertain the date and
time of its celebration.

St. Vartan Armenian Cathedral is located at 630 Second Avenue (corner of
34th Street and Second Avenue), in New York City. Armenian Christmas Eve
services begin at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, January 5. The Armenian Christmas
Morning Service on Tuesday, January 6 will begin at 9:30 a.m., with the
celebration of the Divine Liturgy beginning at 10:30 a.m., followed by the
traditional Blessing of Water ceremony.

###

PACE Monitoring Committee To Adopt A Report On Implementation Of PAC

PACE MONITORING COMMITTEE TO ADOPT A REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PACE RESOLUTIONS BY ARMENIA DECEMBER 17

ArmInfo
2008-12-16 12:56:00

ArmInfo. On December 17 in Paris the PACE Monitoring Committee is
planning to adopt a report on implementation of PACE Resolutions 1609
and 1620 by Armenia.

As the official website of the Council of Europe (CoE) says, the
Commission will consider the issue of functioning of democratic
institutions in Armenia in the light of CoE Commissioner for Human
Rights Thomas Hammarberg’s conclusions made after his recent visit
to Armenia.

To recall, Thomas Hammarberg paid a three-day visit to Armenia on
November 20-23.

Freedom Of Speech As A Means For Fighting Corruption

FREEDOM OF SPEECH AS A MEANS FOR FIGHTING CORRUPTION
Hasmik Dilanyan

"Radiolur"
15.12.2008 13:20

"Armenia is not the only country where corruption exists," US
Ambassador to Armenia Marie Yovanovitch said during today’s conference
on "The role of Media, NGOs and state governance bodies in the fight
against corruption. She suggested her method of fighting the evil,
not forgetting to stress the role of freedom of press.

According to the Ambassador, the task of the government is to ensure
the freedom of speech with the help of the legislative field.

How to fight corruption? According o the Ambassador, any of us
should find solutions. One should avoid searching for easy ways and
refrain from paying for his/her child to be accepted to university or
school. The society should demand from officials to carry out their
duties within the scope of their autghority.

Recognition of The Genocide made public in the House Of Commons

Armenian Solidarity
contact: name: Eilian Williams
c/p The Temple of Peace, Cathays Park
Cardiff, Wales
Tel: 00 44 07876561398
Email: [email protected]

Armenian Solidarity with the
Victims of All Genocides
Nor Serount Cultural Association

Seyfo Centre

C.H.A.K.(Centre of Halabja)
c/o The Temple of Peace, Cathays Park, Cardiff, Wales

Tel:07718982732
[email protected]

PRESS RELEASE

A Recognition of the Armenian Genocide made public in the House Of Commons

The 60th anniversary of the UN Genocide convention was marked in the
House of Commons this week, on tuesday, 9th December, by a public
recognition of the Armenian Genocide by the Socialist Party of
Kurdistan (PSK). Participating in the event were Professor Khatchatur
Pilikian, author Desmond Fernandes, Akif Wan of the KNK and Adnan Kochar
of CHAK.

The PSK statement read :"Turkey has not confronted its history and
is adamant and stubborn in its behaviour. It is less than a century
since the Armenian Genocide happened in front of the eyes of the world.
This shameful act for humanity was condemned by the parliaments of many
countries. Each time the Turkish government and its parliament has
responded to these condemnations with anger. Excluding few conscientious
intellectuals, the so called intellectuals and artists of Turkey have
followed the footsteps of their politicians and tried to hide, deny,
even falsify history and are using every trick in the book to blame the
Armenians.

Of course, in Turkey, the example of a shameful act is not just the
Armenian Genocide, but what was done to the Assyrians, Greeks and Kurds
are crimes against humanity too. During the genocide of the Armenians,
the Assyrians got their share in this slaughter" (whole statement
below)

——————————– ——————————–

Author Desmond Fernandes described the way that Lemkin conceptualised
the term "genocide". The Armenian ‘genocide’ – which he recognised, as
such – had occured, he noted, without the perpetrators being brought to
justice. Lemkin’s conceptualisation of the term "genocide", and campaign
to make it an international crime (through an international initiative
that resulted in the United Nations’ Genocide Convention being passed
exactly 60 years ago), was aimed at trying to address these types of
concerns in a practical manner. Fernandes then outlined the way in which
Armenians, Chaldeans-Assyrians, Greeks, Kurds and "Others", have been
subjected to genocide – not only during the 1915-1918 period, but also
during the so-called ‘War of Independence’ and Turkish republican
period.

He provided case studies to highlight the nature of the genocides, and
detailed the manner in which Tove Skutnabb-Kangas, a renowned genocide
scholar, has reiterated the fact that Turkey still remains, in terms of
the nature of ill-treatment of Kurds, in breach of two articles of the
Genocide Convention. Kurds, as Tove Skutnabb-Kangas and others have
further shown, are also being subjected to ‘linguistic’ and ongoing
‘cultural genocide’. Concerning the nature of targeting of "minorities"
in Turkey, Fernandes outlined the manner in which Armenians, Kurds,
Assyrians, Greeks and "Others" continue to be subjected to cultural
genocide (just as "Greek Cypriots and ‘Christian’ Others" also continue
to be subjected to cultural genocide in the north of Cyprus).

‘Deep political’ and ‘deep state’ linked circles continue to adopt
ideological positions that are all too willing to engage and ‘profit
from’ genocidal actions. Recent statements by the Turkish Prime Minister
(4th November 2008) and Vecdi Gonul, the Defence Minister, have merely
encouraged those who advocate targeting of the ‘non-Turkish Other’.
Their positions, he noted, have been deeply criticised by the Society
for Threatened Peoples, the Socialist Party of Kurdistan (see attached
statement, in full), Arat Dink (the son of assassinated Hrant Dink),
amongst other human rights campaigners, parties and organisations.
Concerning the perspectives of two leading Kurdish parties over the
‘cultural genocide’ debate, he noted that Abdullah Ocalan was recently
(in September 2008) quoted as saying: "I am warning the people against
the cultural genocide and the dangers: I express my opinions". Murat
Karayilan has also been quoted (in Alternatif in September 2008) as
referring to the "cultural genocide policies" of the state. For the
Socialist Party of Kurdistan (PSK): "The genocide against the Kurds has
been ongoing since the time of the Ottoman Empire … We can say that,
all the things done to the Kurds, and at different times and places, …
are physical and cultural genocide. The system that started this policy
towards the end of the Ottoman Empire and that spread all through [the
Turkish] Republican period wanted to exterminate tens of millions of
Kurds through genocide, deportation and assimilation. Even if this has
not been fully achieved, [to date], such policies had a huge destructive
impact on the lives of the Kurdish people. Has the situation changed
today? No. Today, Turkish statesmen are neither brave enough to confront
their history nor to make real changes in their policies that are
suitable for our times. They are disregarding world public opinion and
international law and carrying on with their policies without fear.
Today the system is using the terror that it had created, carrying on
with its militarist and racist activities. It is resisting" initiatives
aimed at "opening a peaceful path for a solution".

——————————— ——————————-

Professor Khatchatur Pilikian in his major speech said:
"The literary genius John Milton, whose 400th anniversary of birth is
exactly today, but it will be marked tomorrow at the Library, Conway
Hall, once uttered this eye-opening remark in his Apology of 1648: "they
who have put out the people’s eyes, reproach them of their blindness."

Even in the first decade of our 21st century, the oppressors’
mantra has remained essentially the same: ‘if you don’t like to be
oppressed, then accept your fate. If not, you better leave your abode,
home and country. At best we will encourage such a move, and at worst we
will force you to leave’. In other words, you are not free to stay and
try to change the status quo of iniquity. If you choose the latter and
struggle for your human rights — enshrined in International Laws,
Covenants and Conventions, not only as an individual, but also as a
people, especially when diverse from the ruling and the oppressing class
— then individual terror or even murder might be your Damoclean sword.
Otherwise deportation and probably state terror leading to Genocide
might befall your ethnic community.

That is exactly why the eminent Turkish Armenian journalist Hrant
Dink was murdered in January last year. And that is what the recent
Prime Minister of the Turkish Republic, Recep Erdogan really meant, on
November 4, this year, when he warned the disenchanted citizens of the
Republic in general and the oppressed minorities in particular, saying:
"Turkey consists of one nation, one flag and one land and that anyone
who is not in agreement with this should leave the country". On November
10, 2008, less than a week after Erdogan’s warning, his Defence Minister
Vecdi Gönül, was in Brussels, marking the 70th anniversary of death
of Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Turkish Republic. Gönül’s
eulogy of Ataturk contained these revealing words: "Would it be possible
today to maintain the same national State if the existence of Greeks in
the Aegean region and of Armenians in several regions of Turkey had
continued as before?"

Curiously enough, the recent Defence Minister of Turkey chose to
forget what Ataturk himself had thought about such state terror
accomplishments. The Turkish historian and sociologist Taner Akcam
informs: "Mustafa Kemal has dozens of speeches in which he defines the
treatments reserved to Armenians as "cowardice", or "barbarity", and
names these treatments "massacre". (See T. Akcam’s: The Geemnocide of
Armenians and the Silence of the Turks, From Empire to Republic, A
Shameful Act.)

"We all know of course that Raphael Lemkin, who first coined the term
"genocide" in 1943, did not mince his words, stating that genocide
"happened so many times. First to the Armenians, then after the
Armenians, Hitler took action." (Dadrian. History of the Armenian
Genocide, p. 350)

According to the Turkish Justice Ministry, 1,700 people were tried
in 2006 alone, under the racist Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code.
Prosecutors of the status quo have a field day in prohibiting so-called
"insulting Turkishness", utilizing Article 301 to silence those valiant
intellectuals who dare challenge the false premises of the official
state denials of historical truths related with the Empire’s and the
Republic’s tragic acts of ethnic and cultural annihilations. Hrant Dink
himself was victimised by Article 301, before his assassination. Not
surprisingly, therefore, that the eminent Turkish civil rights
campaigner and publisher Ragip Zarakolu was found guilty of "insulting
the institutions of the Turkish Republic". Just recently the BBC
announced that a Turkish court has sentenced a Kurdish politician, the
European Parliament’s Sakharov human rights 1995 award winner,
47-year-old Ms Leyla Zana, to 10 years in prison. That is what the
racist Article 301 of Turkey’s penal code is all about-annihilating
dissent and multiculturalism.

It is indeed refreshing to note that all the major Universal
Declarations, International Charters and Conventions are not in
agreement with the monolithic and rabid nationalism of the past and the
present Turkish ruling elite, the like of Erdogan and Gönül,
mentioned above"………

….." Here again Raphael Lemkin’s thoughtful contribution is welcome:
"I understood that the function of memory is not only to register past
events, but to stimulate human conscience [.] It became clear to me that
the diversity of nations, religious groups and races is essential to
civilization because every one of those groups has a mission to fulfill
and a contribution to make in terms of culture."

All the above notwithstanding, UNESCO has been warning the world,
for decades now, that the greatest shame of the current civilisation is
the fact that thousands of children die of hunger every single day.
Today that number has reached the staggering 44,000 hungry children
dying each day of the year, as if a Hiroshima bomb is unleashed every
single day just to kill children. I would like to pose the following:
that the Goebbels’ of this world, "releasing the safety-catch of their
pistols"-in modern parlance cluster bombs & co, ill-Ltd –should also be
seen responsible for the modern massacres of the innocents. Can there be
any doubt that this child cleansing is also the unmentioned genocide of
humanity, ongoing and an authentic one at that, which surely is the
outcome of our own socio-economic and industrial military system, now
coined with cynical panache as Globalisation, whereby tens of thousands
of nuclear warheads, each averaging at least 20 times the destructive
power of a Hiroshima bomb, are already in deployment all around the
world.

Meanwhile billions pour into the pockets of the warmongers of
modern metropolises. These warlords of Mammon would eventually thrive in
an ‘Inorganic Paradise’-a ‘paradise’ void of universal human rights and
sustained by legalised torture; glorification of violence geared towards
maximising profit at any cost; xenophobic state terror protected with
religious fervour. And, topping as if the macabre orgy, genocide has
been already tested, for a century now, to become the collateral damage
of its inorganically modernised and sweat-shopped ‘global village’ of
hunger and debt."

————————————- —————————

Akif Wan of the Kurdish National Congress (KNK) spoke about present
human rights abuses in Turkey, particularly about the 10-year sentence
inflicted on Leyla Zana, the former MP.
Adnan Kochar , director of CHAK spoke about the ecoside inflicted on the
countryside of Kurdistan by the Turkish military.

During the questions,Lord Hylton said that the recent comments by the
Turkish ministers seemed to disqualify Turkey from progressing towards
EU membership. Andrew Pelling MP also participated and expressed his
great interest in the issues.

—————————————– ———————–

PRESS STATEMENT BY THE SOCIALIST PARTY OF KURDISTAN (PSK).
English translation from the Turkish original.

THE ON-GOING PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL GENOCIDE

The rulers of Turkey are unaware of what century and what kind of world
they live in as once again the latest developments have showed. As if
they are behind times for a hundred years or even more. As if they are
unaware of international law and the development of goodwill between
different languages , cultures that became common value of humanity
within the past century. Germany apologised to the Jews and the world
public opinion about the genocide of the Jews. To make sure that it is
not forgotten, genocide monuments erected in Germany and the concrete
evidence of this tragedy, ensures that concentration camps are protected
and open to the public. Putting it another way, Germany has confronted
its history. Australia has apologised for what was done to its
indigenous population, Aborigines, they too confronted their history.

It may not be on the same scale but in our world, no civilised country’s
intellectuals, rulers are trying to cover-up, deny or defend the
genocides against other people which are shameful events in their
history. But in Turkey everything is the opposite of this. Turkey has
not confronted its history and is adamant and stubborn in its behaviour.
It is less than a century since the Armenian Genocide happened in front
of the eyes of the world. This shameful act for humanity was condemned
by the parliaments of many countries. Each time the Turkish government
and its parliament has responded to these condemnations with anger.
Excluding few conscientious intellectuals, the so called intellectuals
and artists of Turkey have followed the footsteps of their politicians
and tried to hide, deny, even falsify history and are using every trick
in the book to blame the Armenians.
Of course, in Turkey, the example of a shameful act is not just the
Armenian Genocide, but what was done to the Assyrians, Greeks and Kurds
are crimes against humanity too. During the genocide of the Armenians,
the Assyrians got their share in this slaughter. In the following years,
that means before the Greek and Turkish governments exchanged
populations, the Greeks who were oppressed and threatened were deported
from Anatolia in their hundreds of thousands . One of the leading
figures carrying out such activities was CELAL BAYAR who was nicknamed
‘GALIP HOCA’ and was from the CUP (Committee for Union and Progress
Party).1 After the war and the exchange of the populations, some Greeks
were allowed to stay in Istanbul because some Turks stayed in Western
Thrace. [But] most of these Greeks left Istanbul as a result of
oppression and the events of 6/7 September which were organised by the
state.

The genocide against the Kurds has been ongoing since the time of the
Ottoman Empire. Marshal Moltke’s memoirs are full of such stories.
During the First World War, alongside the genocide of the Armenians,
700,000 Kurds from Kurdistan were exiled, and deported to central and
western Anatolia. This was an ethnic cleansing and many of these people
died as a result of hunger and cold.

After the war, in order to Turkify Anatolia and to establish a unitary
state, the second biggest population group, the Kurds, were declared as
non-existent. The state was established according to only Turkish
elements. Kurdish history, language and culture was banned. The Kurdish
peoples just reaction to all this was brutally and bloodily suppressed.
After each uprising was put down, the civilian population of the region,
without any discrimination – [including] women, children, young and old
– were subjected to genocide. For example, after the Sheikh Said
rebellion, they killed 20,000 civilians. After the Agri uprising, in
Zilan Stream region, a population of more than 30 villages was
exterminated. After the 1938 Dersim uprising, 60,000 people,
disregarding [the fact that many were] women and children, were
bayonetted, shot, herded en masse into the mills and burnt or were
killed in caves.

The journalist AYSE HUR recently reported on an interview that had taken
place in 1986 with the ex-Foreign Minister of Turkey, IHSAN SABRI
CAGLAYANGIL. [He said]: "The Dersimis [i.e. Kurds in the region] had
taken refuge in the caves. The (Turkish) army used poison gas. Through
the caves entrance … they were poisoned like rats. Aged from 7 to 70,
. the Kurds in Dersim were slaughtered . The [military] operation was
bloody. The Dersim case was finished. The government’s authority was
established in the villages and in Dersim … Today, anyone can go to
Dersim. Gendarma can go, so can you. But lately, especially in the
borders region, the Kurds influenced by the external powers started an
independence movement. Some Kurds live in Turkey, some in Iran…."
(AYSE HUR, 16/11/2008 TARAF GAZETESI).

After these uprisings and many smaller ones, the masses were exiled. By
doing
so they wanted to clear out the Kurds from the region. The appearance of
the PKK and its armed struggle was used as a pretext to evacuate and
demolish more than 4,000 villages and towns. 3-4 million [Kurdish]
people were exiled from their homeland as thousands of ‘unsolved
murders’ of Kurdish intellectuals and patriots occurred that took the
form of full massacre. These are the end result of policies that have
been implemented over the past 30 years.

The oppression and bans continued along with forced assimilation and
Turkification policies. They wanted to wipe out the language, culture –
in short, the very existence of the people who lived on their land for
thousands of years, who had deep roots and contributed to the
civilisation of Anatolia, Iran and Mesopotomia, who had their own
distinct and rich
history and language.

In conclusion, we can say that, all the things done to the Kurds, and at
different times and places, were beyond ethnic cleansing and they are
physical and cultural genocide. The system that started this policy
towards the end of Ottoman Empire and that spread all through [the
Turkish] Republican period wanted to exterminate tens of millions of
Kurds through genocide, deportation and assimilation. Even if this has
not been fully achieved [to date], such policies had a huge destructive
impact on the lives of the Kurdish people.

Has the situation changed today? No. Today, Turkish statesmen are
neither brave enough to confront their history nor to make real changes
in their policies that are suitable for our times. They are disregarding
world public opinion and international law and carrying on with their
policies without fear. Today the system is using the terror that it had
created, carrying on with its militarist and racist activities. It is
resisting [initiatives aimed at] opening a peaceful path for a
solution. They are not allowing [Kurdish] exiles to return to their
land. The ban on language and culture is on going. Even today, there is
no freedom of expression and organisation for the Kurds. The
intellectuals who support them are punished according to the laws such
as Turkish Penal Code article 301 and by similar articles.

The Turkish Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, recently visited the
Kurdish region and had this to say to the people who asked for cultural
and political rights:
"…The ones who don’t accept the idea of one state, one nation, one
flag, should leave the country …".

In fact, this is an infamous slogan of fascism: "love it or leave it
..".

On 10/11/2008 (The anniversary of Ataturk’s death on10/11/1938), the
Defense Minister, Mr.VECDI GONUL, who was in Brussels for a meeting,
openly claimed that without the genocide of the Armenians and the
deportation of the Greeks, there would have been no national state.
These are Vecdi Gonul’s exact words:

"…The most important step during the establishment of the nation was
exchange of the populations. Just think, would it have been possible for
us to become a nation state, if the Greeks had continued to live in
Aegean region and the Armenians in many parts of Anatolia?"

The Defence Minister, Mr. V.Gonul went on with an example from Ankara:
"… Just one district of Ankara were Muslims in those days ." and added
that another one [was] Greek and another one Armenian. He also stated
that, at the time, Izmir Trade Organisation was made up of non-Muslims.
Mr. Gonul is admitting that with genocide and deportations, Turkey was
ethnically cleansed, the finances were gained by Muslim Turks, and by
doing so, the nation state was set up and what is more, he defended
such action.

Honestly, there are no Greek or Armenian districts, Greeks or Armenians
left in Ankara. Such Greek or Armenian districts don’t exist in Istanbul
either. Despite all that the ones who stayed behind and how they feel is
not a secret. The events that took place in Malatya and murder of HRANT
DINK with the knowledge and support of the police and gendarme
authorities are still fresh in our minds.

Today, the extermination of the Kurds, and the physical and cultural
genocidal policies that are implemented against the Kurds are a
continuation of that "NATION BUILDING" mentality. It is obvious that the
Turkish statesmen believe that they have not completed the task yet ….

1 Celal Bayar was Prime Minister of Turkey in 1937 & later President in
1950.

An Existential Lebanese Choice?

AN EXISTENTIAL LEBANESE CHOICE?
by Harry Hagopian

Newropeans Magazine
t/view/8742/1/
Dec 11 2008
France

Over the years, many analysts have lost their political periscopes
in the treacherous sands of Lebanese politics. Today there are four
largely inter-related and major issues at the epicentre of the Lebanese
political discord: the national pan-confessional dialogue under the
auspices of the president of the republic, the future of arms in
the hands of different political groups and militias, the future of
Palestinian refugees and the decisive impetus that Christians will
in all likelihood inject into the forthcoming parliamentary elections
of 2009…

Over the years, many analysts have lost their political periscopes in
the treacherous sands of Lebanese politics. First, there were "civil
wars" for almost fifteen years that tore the country up and set it
aflame. Then, the TaÃ"f Accords ostensibly stepped in to redress the
ornery behaviour of its leaders but ended up curbing the powers of the
president of the republic or its Christian communities and admittedly
placed the country under an Anjar-centred Syrian tutelage. Much later,
the country witnessed the Independence Intifada of 2005 when new
neo-revolutionary values unfurled on the streets and vied with older
realities. But despite all those upheavals, the Cedars of Lebanon have
remained a political conundrum as they have wrestled time and again
with sectarian uncertainties let alone political infidelities. Lebanon
celebrated on 22nd November its much-cherished 65th Independence Day,
but unlike the Israeli-Palestinian or Iraqi conflicts that exhibit a
set of unflinching core issues, one can never presume to predict what
political ghoul would come out of which Lebanese corner at any moment.

Today, I would suggest that there are four largely inter-related and
major issues at the epicentre of the Lebanese political discord. They
consist of the national pan-confessional dialogue under the auspices
of the president of the republic, the future of arms in the hands of
different political groups and militias, the future of Palestinian
refugees both inside and outside their camps and last but not least
the decisive impetus that Christians will in all likelihood inject
into the forthcoming parliamentary elections of 2009.

The national dialogue: in some way, it is a by-product of the Doha
main deal that facilitated the election of a new president and the
formation of a "national unity" cabinet that houses diametrically
opposite standpoints. It was also meant to foster reconciliation
between the warring factions and address the unresolved standoff about
the legitimacy of arms outside the remit of the army. This dialogical
exercise, I believe, would only be a cosmetic exercise that does not
have much chance for real progress but will nonetheless hopefully
keep the peace amongst major players who have committed publicly to
the Doha process. It could also be a catalyst in restraining all
parties from unilateral and bellicose moves that would wrench the
lid off the present insecure calm.

The future of arms that Hizbullah, the Party of God, has in its
possession: this is meant to be a central plank for the national
reconciliation dialogue. However, most seasoned commentators are aware
that this issue cannot be resolved before the parliamentary elections
in the spring of 2009. No way will this party, let alone its allies
or protagonists, surrender their arms whilst they maintain the need
for resistance against an Israel that still occupies small plots of
Lebanese land and exhibits what they consider an expansionist threat
on the country. So much so in fact that the Free Patriotic Movement
leader General Michel Aoun returned from a recent visit to Iran and
presented his blueprint for a national defence strategy that is
based on his 2005 Memorandum of Understanding with Hizbullah. It
called for combining the Resistance and the Lebanese army into a
"community resistance" that would command the loyalty and resources
of the state along with all its institutions and citizens. What this
blueprint for a defence strategy actually imputed is a negation of
the need for UNSC Resolutions 1701 and 1559.

But this blueprint that aims to mobilise all the citizens of the state
could become another dangerous recipe for further civil wars. As the
leader of the Progressive Socialist Party Walid Jumblatt counter-argued
in the weekly newsletter al-Anba’a, General Aoun’s proposition would
transform Lebanon into a "constant war field, which topples stability,
torpedoes investment and increases emigration." Taken one step nearer
toward at least one of its logical conclusions, Jumblatt’s viewpoint
translates into the fact that the state is the sole authority, and that
any defence strategy that does not respect the pluralism of the state
cannot be taken into consideration in any future discussions. After
all, was the temporary takeover of the western districts of Beirut
by Hizbullah and Amal elements on the fateful night of 7th May not
a dangerously implicit manifestation of consensus by coercion?

The future of Palestinian refugees: to start with the tactical
considerations, it is helpful to recall that disarming Palestinian
factions outside the camps was meant to have already been decided
during the first national dialogue in 2006 prior to the war with
Israel in July. So their status strictu sensu is not in my legal
opinion lite pendente anymore. However, political calculations have
prevented implementing its provisions practically on the ground.

Insofar as the Palestinian camps are concerned, it is also important to
recall that the idea of tawtin (or the granting of residency through
Lebanese citizenship to those refugees in the camps across Lebanon)
that would push up the Sunni quota in the country if ever implemented
is a political non-sequitur used by politicians as a ruse to prop
up their own political ends. The Lebanese government, and the PLO as
the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, have already
agreed that no tawtin will occur in Lebanon since such a move would
undermine inter alia the validity under International law of UNSC
194 calling for the right of return [to their homelands].

Indeed, the Palestinian-Lebanese Dialogue Committee (LPDC) works
pan-politically to defuse such malingering chronicles, as well as to
rebuild Nahr el Bared near Tripoli that was destroyed substantially
following the battles between the Lebanese army and the Fatah al
Islam radical movement. It also strives to improve the long-standing
and truly deplorable conditions in some of those camps. Such efforts
must not only be maintained, but also re-doubled seriously, without
opening rifts between the Lebanese and Palestinian peoples that would
be a throwback to the bloody battles three decades ago. Moreover,
the issue of tawtin should not be dragged into the electoral ring by
the Cassandras of Lebanon who believe that purveying bad news would
inevitably strengthen their flanks.

Christian performance in the forthcoming elections: all my contacts
with different Lebanese pundits confirm that the battle for Christian
votes will arguably be the hub of political alliances or lobbies in
the months ahead. The recent Shi’i-Sunni ‘summit’ between Sayyed Hassan
Nasrallah and Sa’ad Hariri resulted in a ‘reconciliation’ of sorts with
both leaders excluding any electoral alliance between them. So the
Sunni and Shi’i seats are almost clear pickings in most districts –
with few notable exceptions. Even a putative future meeting between
Walid Jumblatt and Hassan Nasrallah will in my opinion not result
in any electoral pact and therefore cannot alter substantially the
calculus of their respective seats in the next parliament. All this
leaves the Christian candidates to fight it out amongst themselves –
cleaved as they are between the March 8th and 14th coalitions.

But the present dynamics are dangerous as they reflect Christian
tensions inter partes that have not mimicked the corresponding easing
of tensions within Muslim camps. This has led to occasional verbal
attacks against the institutional pillars of Christian society,
namely the Maronite patriarch and even the president. With baffling
alliances so characteristic of Lebanese intra-politics, one way of
engendering support seems to be through the dangerous exhumation of
past demons and animosities. There is real fear as to the outcome of
those votes in view of the way that candidates are being chosen by
the different parties. Indeed, with diametrically opposite political
platforms, strategies and even expectations, I would suggest that the
Christian voter is faced with clear-cut choices that are not solely
binary but also organic in their ramifications on the overall future
of the country.

This is why we keep hearing alarm bells hither and thither, with
dichotomous positions over the impact of the TaÃ"f Accords, and
international alliances and regional influences being exercised by
Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Syria and Iran, let alone the USA and Europe,
over issues that centre upon freedom, pluralism, religion and
resistance. Indeed, Christian divisions can even be seen at the
micro-level of national governance. Just observe how the small
but influential Armenian parties – namely the Tashnag party – have
heretofore broken their legendary collective neutrality in support
of the presidential powers-to-be and have now forged new cross-party
political alliances.

In fact, this sense of constant political realignments is becoming a
talking point of the forthcoming parliamentary elections as everyone
eyes the stance of President Michel Suleiman. It seems an independent,
middle-of-the-road national parliamentary bloc that has a Christian
ethos and owes its organic allegiance to the president is an idea
that is rapidly gaining currency in the country. In fact, if such a
bloc emerges after the parliamentary elections, it could conceivably
sway the power politics of the country and affect the clout of both
principal coalitions.

However, such an emergent movement could damage General Aoun’s
electoral self-anointed position as sole Lebanese Christian
leader. After all, the former deputy prime minister and Metn
powerbroker Michel al-Murr has withdrawn from his bloc, a move
that could tip the balance in the Metn and impact the neighbouring
Kesrouan – alongside any probable Armenian shifts in their own
electoral platforms. No wonder then that Syrian channels are trying
to prevent such fragmentation by bolstering General Aoun’s standing
with Lebanese Christian constituents and proclaiming him "leader of
Christians in the Orient" with an "historic mission" and an "objective,
national Lebanese personality" who harbours "a strategic insight that
understands Arab and regional powers."

Another major underlying focus in all those alliances is the definition
of the role Syria ought to play in Lebanon. There is a battle being
waged between those supportive of an active role, and those who reject
it, and Syria itself is heavily involved in spinning the outcome. All
this explains somewhat the reason why an almost surreal episode played
out on Syrian New TV quite recently, with the televised confessions
of alleged Fatah al-Islam members attempting to discredit the March
14th coalition in the person of Sa’ad Hariri’s Sunni Al-Mustaqbal
(Future) party by associating it with terrorism. But this ill-advised
and frankly unpolished strategy seems to have yielded no concrete
results. I understand that the prosecuting judge of the International
Tribunal mandated by UNSC 1701 to look into the assassination of
former Lebanese PM Rafik Hariri and 21 others on February 14 2005,
as well as a string of subsequent political murders, is close to
submitting his report to the UN Security Council.

Mind you, logic would dictate that such allegedly "terrorist members"
in Syrian custody should be handed over to the Lebanese authorities
investigating those murders. After all, the ‘security coordination’
mooted between Lebanon and Syria following an earlier visit to
Damascus by the Lebanese Interior Minister Ziad Baroud should fulfil
its coordinating role within a clear judicial remit, or else the
whole concept of ‘coordination’ becomes an Orwellian concept that
would bear a less edifying intent.

However, all polarisations, reservations and even fears surrounding
the pending judgment of the tribunal should not stunt the progress
of the much-touted diplomatic relations between Lebanon and
Syria. Whether half the Lebanese populace likes it or not, Syria is
one of the most critical players in Lebanon and the Arab World. Its
larger global geo-strategic interests will not allow it to eclipse
entirely – certainly not at the present time. The establishment
of embassies between Lebanon and Syria before end-year is therefore
quintessential. However, for such progress not to be merely ephemeral,
it is important to proceed equally with the demarcation and proper
control of borders. And given that Syria opposes such demarcation
starting from the litigious zone of the Shaba’a Farms, I suggest
initiating the process from the north, followed by a revision by a
parliamentary commission of previous bilateral accords, and an enquiry
by the International Red Cross into Lebanese citizens in Syrian gaols.

Lebanon today is perched precariously between life and death,
facing success and failure in co-equal dimensions. It is therefore
vital for it to enter into a necessary accommodation with Syria that
would introduce an element of stability into the region let alone
into Lebanon itself but would definitively not jeopardise Lebanese
territorial integrity or sovereignty. I admit candidly that this is a
difficult balance in view of the different political variables at play,
and I can observe how twisted French foreign diplomacy has become of
late as President Nicolas Sarkozy tries to square the political circle
by strengthening Lebanon as an independent state whilst re-introducing
Syria onto the international scene and re-engaging with its regional
responsibilities. But the fact remains that any other skewed outcome
would mean that the parliamentary elections could well take place,
but they will fail to unravel the Gordian knot that is undermining
Lebanon and its hardy citizens.

Perhaps what might be helpful is the introduction of a quality of
change that respects the National Pact guaranteeing the coexistence
of all communities in Lebanon, whilst also not shying away from the
onus of renegotiating the structure of power in Lebanon. Without being
a naïve theoretician, I judge that the president of the republic,
alongside the UN as guarantor, could provide such a political egress
from this standoff. But for such a development to germinate in the
country, political leaders must desist from thinking or acting like
militia or clan leaders anymore and metamorphose into statesmen
who use the appropriate tools to build up government capacity and
nation-building in a bottom-up process that reflects the real global
architecture of our common future.

Openly put, Lebanon requires an existential choice that would take
it forward. Otherwise, what I fear we will witness in this period of
electioneering – and also thereafter when the votes have been counted
and the stalemates have re-surfaced in different formats and numbers
– is not only a status quo ante but a much more perilous and radical
heightening of tensions that could result in a screeching collision
of the bullet with the ballot box.

–Boundary_(ID_v9NKR3XG1iGWIfv9ypHHXQ)–

http://www.newropeans-magazine.org/conten

Turkish Speaker Calls On Parliaments "Not To Undermine Turkish-Armen

TURKISH SPEAKER CALLS ON PARLIAMENTS "NOT TO UNDERMINE TURKISH-ARMENIAN DIALOGUE"

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.12.2008 15:13 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Turkish Parliament urged the parliaments of
other countries not to disrupt the process of rapprochement between
Turkey and Armenia with efforts to recognize the Armenian Genocide.

"Politicians and parliaments cannot judge about history," said
Parliament Speaker Koksal Toptan.

"We have always warned the parliaments [of other countries] that such
moves will not help Turkey-Armenia talks. All responsible parliaments
should now avoid hindering the ongoing process," he said. "There are
70,000 Armenian people working in Turkey and many Turkish products
are sold in Armenia. If we continue in this direction, there will be
no issues left for the Armenian diaspora to abuse."

"It’s gratifying that other parliaments share our view and we welcome
the decision of the French parliament to discuss these incidents,"
Toptan said.

The lower house of the French parliament adopted a bill criminalizing
denial of the Armenian Genocide in October 2006. However, the bill
was blocked by the Senate this year.

BAKU: Ziyafat Asgarov: "What Is The Use Of Minsk Group, If We Will O

ZIYAFAT ASGAROV: "WHAT IS THE USE OF MINSK GROUP, IF WE WILL OURSELVES REACH AN UNDERSTANDING WITH ARMENIA?"

APA
12 Dec 2008 14:48

Baku. Elnur Mammadli – APA. "There are no effective results within
the period OSCE Minsk Group has existed. They always say we should
ourselves reach an understanding with Armenia, they can only give
proposals. What is the use of Minsk Group, if we will ourselves reach
an understanding with Armenia?" Vice-Speaker of Azerbaijani Parliament
Ziyafat Asgarov told journalists, APA reports. He said the current
format of the settlement of Nagorno Karabakh conflict should not
be refused.

"I think there is no need to refuse Minsk Group format, we should
work with this group. But we should lay down conditions before the
Minsk Group, so that their activity has concrete results. If Armenia
does not release the occupied territories, ignores the UN resolutions,
Minsk Group should have its say," he said.

Prime Minister Of Georgia: Georgian-Armenian Relations Characterized

PRIME MINISTER OF GEORGIA: GEORGIAN-ARMENIAN RELATIONS CHARACTERIZED AS SUSTAINABLE AND DYNAMICALLY DEVELOPING

ArmInfo
2008-12-09 13:54:00

ArmInfo. Georgian-Armenian relations are characterized as sustainable
and dynamically developing, Grigol Mgaloblishvili, Prime Minister
of Georgia said at the 7th session of the Armenian-Georgian
Intergovernmental Commission for Economic Cooperation in Tbilisi,
Tuesday, ArmInfo correspondent reported. The Georgian premier hopes
the session will give an impetus to development of Georgian- Armenian
relations.

For his part, Prime Minister of Armenia Tigran Sargsyan thanked his
counterpart for warm reception and said that the bilateral relations
will attain a new quality thanks to implementation of the agreements
reached in the course of the session. Armenian premier mentioned the
recent visit Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan to Georgia and the
specific agreements reached to promote the Georgian-Armenian relations.

Protocol of Intent will be signed in the course of the session. In
addition, the parties will amend the Agreement of Mutual Trade signed
on 14 August 1995. Another agreement on cooperation in the sphere of
culture for 2009-2010 will be signed. After the session, the Armenian
delegation will visit the local Armenian Church Norashen. The same
evening, Georgian President Mihkeil Saakashvili will receive the
Armenian delegates.

March 1: Not Part Of Internal Corruption?

MARCH 1: NOT PART OF INTERNAL CORRUPTION?

A1+
[06:26 pm] 09 December, 2008

Thirty Armenian prosecutors, ten investigators from the special
investigative service, ten police investigators, two NSS officials,
two officials of the tax service, two customs officials have joined
the representatives of the U.S. corresponding bodies to find out how
they can fight against corruption.

How appropriate and effective is it for Armenian experts to leave
work and participate in the conference held on the U.S. Department of
Justice on "Successful Techniques for the Investigation and Prosecution
of Corruption"? RA Deputy Prosecutor General Armen Danielyan explained
to "A1+".

"I hope that this will be just one of the conferences and that we will
have the opportunity to get acquainted with procedures in the U.S. We
must free ourselves from corruption at the political, governmental
and economic levels in order to create a democratic society."

Danileyan doesn’t believe that Armenians lack the will to fight
against corruption. "As Deputy Prosecutor General, I assure you
that the Prosecutor General is willing to support the fight against
corruption and we will engage journalists in the process."

How do you envision the fight against corruption when many Armenian
citizens distrust prosecutors and complain about prosecutors? In
response to this, Danielyan said:

"We can always say that there are people who lack trust. I believe
that the behavior of a state official may serve as a basis to form
public opinion that there is corruption in government."

Why don’t people trust the Prosecution General? Head of the department
of fight against corruption and organized crimes of the RA Prosecution
General Armen Arshafyan had this to say to that:

"The people lack trust not only in prosecutors, but also many state
structures. We must gradually overcome that barrier with your help."

Today’s conference did not touch upon the events of March 1, even from
the aspects of loss or increase in people’s trust in prosecutors and
the courts.

Since U.S. Prosecutor Steven Kessler believes that the goal of the
conference is to make it easier for citizens to complain to the
police. "A1+" asked Kessler why the conference overlooked the events
of March 1.

"We haven’t touched upon those issues because what we are discussing
refers to the fight against corruption," said Mr. Kessler and added:
"I understand that citizens are not satisfied with the work of the
police and prosecutors, but I hope that Armenian judges and prosecutors
will reach success and will take into account the decisions of the
European Court."