Des Historiens Veulent Saisir Jacques Chirac Si Le Senat Confirme Ce

DES HISTORIENS VEULENT SAISIR JACQUES CHIRAC SI LE SENAT CONFIRME CETTE " PROVOCATION "
Jean-Baptiste de Montvalon

Le Monde
14 octobre 2006 samedi

LE TEXTE etait, a leurs yeux, " affligeant " ; son vote constitue
" une veritable provocation ". Reunis dans la soiree du jeudi 12
octobre, quelques heures après l’examen par l’Assemblee nationale de
la proposition de loi visant a sanctionner la negation du genocide
armenien, les membres de l’association Liberte pour l’histoire ont
redige un communique virulent.

Promettant, " si le Senat devait confirmer le vote de l’Assemblee
", de demander au president de la Republique de " saisir le Conseil
constitutionnel (…) pour qu’il annule " cette loi, ces historiens
– parmi lesquels Jean-Pierre Azema, Elisabeth Badinter, Marc Ferro,
Jacques Julliard, Pierre Milza, Pierre Nora, Mona Ozouf, Rene Remond,
Jean-Pierre Vernant – font part de leur vive inquietude.

Tout en exprimant leur " profond sentiment de solidarite " pour les "
victimes de l’histoire ", ils deplorent que la France soit " engagee
dans un processus accelere de lois etablissant des verites d’Etat sur
le passe ". " Un mouvement rapide d’appropriation de l’histoire par
des memoires particulières et de recul des libertes democratiques
" se poursuit, constatent-ils, " alors meme que le president de
la Republique a declare que "ce n’est pas au Parlement d’ecrire
l’histoire". "

" VERITES OFFICIELLES "

Liberte pour l’histoire revient sur l’autre affront de la journee :
le rejet d’un amendement UMP qui visait a exclure les " recherches
universitaires ou scientifiques " du champ d’application de la
loi. " L’Assemblee nationale vient d’ôter le masque : ce ne sont pas
d’eventuels "troubles a l’ordre public" qu’elle entend empecher par
ces lois, c’est bien la recherche universitaire et tous les enseignants
qu’elle veut, sous peine d’amende ou de prison, soumettre aux verites
officielles qu’elle edicte ", relèvent les historiens.

Soucieux que leur reaction ne soit pas percue comme corporatiste,
ils soulignent qu’ils " se trouvent en première ligne d’un combat qui
interesse tous les citoyens et met en cause la possibilite pour chacun
d’acceder a la connaissance et au libre examen ". " Ce sont bien les
libertes de pensee et d’expression qui sont menacees ", insistent-ils.

En decembre 2005, ces historiens avaient signe une petition reclamant
l’abrogation partielle de plusieurs lois " memorielles ", dont celle
sur la reconnaissance du genocide armenien. Si l’alinea de la loi sur
les rapatries consacrant le " rôle positif " de la colonisation a ete
par la suite abroge par decret, les historiens redoutent desormais
un engrenage.

Des dispositions similaires pourraient etre proposees au sujet
de l’esclavage, reconnu par la loi Taubira comme un " crime contre
l’humanite ". " Demain, ce sera le tour des Vendeens, et après-demain
des Albigeois ! ", s’exclame Pierre Nora, qui se dit " epouvante "
par cette " formidable regression ".

–Boundary_(ID_w0Hof95CIBiKnT2UKX8cdg)–

"United Javakhk" Faction Chairmanship Member Arrested

"UNITED JAVAKHK" FACTION CHAIRMANSHIP MEMBER ARRESTED

Noyan Tapan News Agency, Armenia
Oct 16 2006

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 16, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. Vahagn Chakhalian,
a member of the "United Javakhk" ("Miasnakan Javakhk") democratic
faction chairmanship was arrested on October 11 by employees of the
RA National Security Service. "United Javakhk" informed about it in
the October 13 statement. Presenting themselves as police employees,
they invited V.Chakhalian to the police department as a victim,
but take him to the Special Security Service isolator.

As it is mentioned in the statement, V.Chakhalian was presented
"accusation for illegally crossing the RA state border." Based on the
accusation mentioned on October 13, the Court of First Instance of
the Kentron and Nork-Marash communities of Yerevan made a decision
to use arrest as a prevention mean towards V.Chakhalian.

"Especially the circumstance causes indignation that instead of
examining and revealing dangerous criminals committed the act of
violence against V.Chakhalian, subjected to hooligan attack and got
serious bodily injuries, the latter’s family as well as faction
member Gurgen Shirinian, the victim is being pursued with false
accusations. The mentioned circumstance obviously proves presence of
direct tie between the act of violence committed against V.Chakhalian
and arrest followed it and some forces’ order," the statement authors
mention.

"United Javakhk" is anxious that future events may bring to dangerious
and unforeseen developments. "Vahagn’s absence and the successive
attempts to liguidate the faction with firm means strike heavy blows
to the present system securing stability in Javakhk, in which "United
Javakhk" has a decisive role owing to the population’s all-embracing
assistance," is said in the statement.

"Famous margin forces and criminal clans strive for keeping monopoly
of presenting himself on behalf of Armenians of Javakhk and with
their not responsible actions they create serious threat for the
regional stablity," faction members mention, expressing hope that
all the interested forces, particularly, the authorities of Armenia
"will foster more clever attitude towards the mentioned forces’
activity which may bring to destroying the regional stablity system
and most seriously damage the Armenian-Georgian interstate relations."

Les Turcs Mobilises Contre La Loi Sur Le Genocide Armenien

LES TURCS MOBILISES CONTRE LA LOI SUR LE GENOCIDE ARMENIEN

Le Temps, Suisse
16 octobre 2006

TURQUIE. Manifestations contre le projet de loi francais. Ankara en
appelle a des represailles mesurees contre la France.

Plusieurs centaines de personnes ont manifeste samedi a Istanbul devant
le consulat de France pour denoncer le vote en première lecture a
l’Assemblee nationale francaise d’une proposition de loi penalisant
la negation du genocide armenien.

Une première manifestation a ete organisee par un petit parti de gauche
nationaliste sous l’oeil vigilant des policiers antiemeute deployes
dans le quartier de Beyoglu, dans le centre-ville. Les manifestants
brandissant des drapeaux turcs ont appele les Turcs a ne plus acheter
les produits francais. Un deuxième groupe de manifestants, rassembles
a l’appel d’une organisation ultranationaliste, a conspue le vote
des deputes francais et accuse le gouvernement turc de "laxisme". Les
dirigeants turcs ont prevenu la France d’une crise dans les relations
bilaterales. Et des represailles economiques pourraient se traduire
par l’exclusion des firmes francaises des contrats publics.

Mais dimanche, les consommateurs turcs etaient invites a temperer
leur reaction contre la France, au lendemain d’un appel du president
francais Jacques Chirac au remier ministre turc, percu a Ankara comme
un signe d’apaisement (lire ci-contre). L’ambiance en Turquie etait
donc un peu plus calme dimanche pour une approche rationnelle quant
aux represailles contre les produits francais. Pour ne pas contrarier
sa candidature a l’Union europeenne, Ankara n’imposera sans doute
pas un boycott officiel mais de nombreux appels au boycottage des
marques francaises ont ete lances.

Le ministre armenien des Affaires Etrangères a indique dimanche qu’il
s’efforcerait de normaliser les relations avec la Turquie, malgre
son profond mecontentement devant le refus turc de reconnaître comme
genocide les massacres d’Armeniens sous l’Empire ottoman.

–Boundary_(ID_WjfnUAnMpOpC1zp5uonujQ)–

ANKARA: It’s Not An Issue Of Armenian ‘Genocide’ Denial, Stupid …

IT’S NOT AN ISSUE OF ARMENIAN ‘GENOCIDE’ DENIAL, STUPID …
Cengiz Candar – [email protected]

The News Anatolian
Oct 11 2006

Opinions

A collision between the two trains is more imminent than expected. A
"train crash," code for describing the deep crisis between Turkey
and Europe has been predicted, if it cannot be avoided, for December,
following the progress report which is expected to be very critical
of Turkey’s recent performance on its way to accession in the European
Union. The greatest stumbling block has been the Cyprus issue.

Yet France, by introducing legislation on punishing all those denying
an Armenian "genocide" with five years in prison, is accelerating
that collision. The Armenian issue has overtaken the Cyprus one. If
the French Parliament passes the bill in tomorrow’s vote,
a collision will be unavoidable.

But, between whom?

After all, EU Enlargement Commissioner Olli Rehn has warned the French
about the counter-productivity of the move, thus absolving the EU of
any responsibility in France’s irresponsible and damaging behavior.

The collision will surely take place between Turkey and France. However
it is impossible that such a collision won’t leave create a backlash
in the already troubled Turkish-EU relations.

That will add more fuel to the current public Turkish disillusionment
over its European prospects since it is not only France but also the
Netherlands and some other EU member states as well who are after
further alienating Turkey to keep it at a distance from the gates of
the EU.

The climate between Turkey and the EU would be poisoned to such an
extent that to be able to breathe the fresh air required to have
Turkey on board for accession will be very difficult.

Does Turkey have any other alternative, like moving closer to Russia,
Iran and its immediate neighborhood, as some in Ankara’s bureaucracy
have suggested on several occasions?

This is a non-option in terms of realpolitik.

However, further alienation of Turkey from the EU could also
destabilize Turkey and instability in Turkey would have repercussions
on European security, dwarfing the demise of Yugoslavia compared to
Turkey’s destabilization in a post-9/11 world with the specter of a
clash of civilizations.

The political dwarfs in France, be it the Socialists or the Nicholas
Sarkozy school of conservatives, have failed to grasp the strategic
implications of their petit-politics.

In contrast to neighboring political underweights in France and the
Netherlands, former Deputy Chancellor and German Foreign Minister
Joschka Fischer wrote an op-ed piece entitled "Turkey and Europe;
Two Trains About to Collide" in which he underlined, "By intervening
in Lebanon, Europeans have made a far-reaching, risk-fraught, and,
at the same time, correct decision. The reason is that the future
of Europe’s security will be determined in the eastern Mediterranean
and the Middle East.

Europe, whether it likes it or not, has taken on a new, strategic
role in the region. Should it fail, the price will be high.

"In view of the serious risks that Europe has assumed, in full
awareness of the consequences, it is of the utmost importance that
a European ‘Grand Strategy’ for the eastern Mediterranean and the
Middle East be developed so that Europe can calmly and clearly define
its interests. In any serious variation of this grand strategy,
Turkey will need to play a central role — politically, militarily,
economically, and culturally.

"Safeguarding Europe’s interests today means establishing a strong
link — indeed an unbreakable bond — with Turkey as a cornerstone of
regional security. So it is astonishing that Europe is doing exactly
the opposite: firmly closing its eyes to the strategic challenge
posed by Turkey.

"Successful modernization and democratization of Turkey — with a
strong civil society, the rule of law, and a modern economy — will
not only be hugely beneficial for the country, but will also export
stability and serve as a model for transformation in the Islamic
world. Above all, the successful modernization of a large Muslim
country will make a decisive contribution to Europe’s security."

He concluded, "Some in the EU — mainly in France, Germany and
Austria — seem smugly pleased by the prospect of a clash on this
issue, believing it will force Turkey to give up its drive for
membership. But this attitude is irresponsible. The EU is about to
commit a grave strategic error by allowing its report this autumn to
be guided by the short-sighted domestic policy considerations of some
of its important member states.

"Admittedly, Turkey has a long way to go. But to endanger this process
here and now, in full awareness of the possible costs, is an act of
very costly stupidity on the part of the Europeans — and stupidity is
the worst sin in politics. In European-Turkish relations, two trains
are racing headlong toward each other.

Neither Turkey nor Europe can afford the all-too-foreseeable crash."

The issue is not merely a French legislative process on the denial of
an Armenian "genocide;" it will have strategic ramifications. It has
only been a week since U.S. President Bush strongly endorsed Turkey’s
EU bid and interpreted it as being in "the U.S.’ national interests."

The Turkish government, therefore, could play its hand by
"internationalizing" its legitimate friction with France.

ANKARA: Turkish Min., EU’s Frattini discuss concerns Genocide Law

Anatolia news agency, Ankara,
12 Oct 06

TURKISH MINISTER, EU’S FRATTINI DISCUSS CONCERNS OVER ARMENIAN
GENOCIDE LAW

Brussels, 12 October: Turkish State Minister and Chief Negotiator for
EU talks Ali Babacan met European Commission Vice-President Franco
Frattini for Justice, Freedom and Security in Brussels on Thursday
[12 October].

Speaking to Turkish reporters, Babacan said that French parliament’s
decision on adoption of a bill on criminalizing denial of so-called
Armenian genocide was a concerning development regarding the future
of the EU, noting that this decision would make a negative impact on
(Turkish people’s) senses on EU.

"It is not reasonable to respond to France’s mistakes by making
mistakes. We will keep fulfilling reforms," Babacan stressed.

Replying to questions on Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code (TCK),
Babacan noted that technical works on this matter were under way. "We
will monitor its implementation. There can be amendments on any law.
However developments in France will make difficult initiatives on the
matter," he said.

Responding to a question on Turkey’s attitude in regard to the
decision of France, Babacan said that the government has not made a
decision on the matter yet, underlining that this issue would be
discussed in the first meeting of the Council of Ministers.

Noting that European Commission’s reaction to the decision of France
was a very important development, he stressed: "We consider the
commission’s attitude positive and sound."

"We are continuing legal arrangements on EU adjustment laws. Turkish
Parliamentary General Assembly will debate the law on foundations
next week," Babacan said upon a question. He noted: "Now Turkey aims
to be a full member of the EU."

Stating that he held very fruitful meetings in Brussels, Babacan
indicated that there could be progress regarding visa procedure for
Turkish businessmen, students and academicians.

In regard to prominent Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk, who won the 2006
Nobel Prize for literature, Babacan stated: "It is a very important
development."

NYT: Turkish Laureate Criticizes French Legislation

Turkish Laureate Criticizes French Legislation

By SEBNEM ARSU
Published: October 14, 2006

ISTANBUL, Oct. 13 – Orhan Pamuk, the Turkish novelist who won the
Nobel Prize in Literature this week, went on television Friday to
criticize the French parliamentary vote that would make it a crime to
deny that the Ottoman Turks’ mass killing of Armenians constituted
genocide.

In a telephone interview broadcast live on the private television
network NTV, Mr. Pamuk, who faced criminal charges for his statements
acknowledging the massacre, said France had acted against its own
fundamental principles of freedom of expression.

`The French tradition of critical thinking influenced and taught me a
lot,’ he said. `This decision, however, is a prohibition and didn’t
suit the libertarian nature of the French tradition.’ The legislation
was approved by the lower house of Parliament, but it is uncertain
whether the upper house will concur.

In any case, Mr. Pamuk urged his compatriots not to let their
frustration with France get out of hand. He used a Turkish proverb to
get his point across. Roughly translated, it means `Don’t set the
blanket on fire for a flea.’

Some analysts fear that widespread anger against the French
legislation may turn more Turks against joining the European Union. A
Turkish opinion poll released in July showed a decline in support, to
58 percent from a high of 74 percent in 2003, in part because of the
prolonged road to admission.

Mr. Pamuk’s statement came after some in the country voiced suspicions
that the award was politically motivated. Mr. Pamuk owes part of his
celebrity in Europe to his criticism of Turkey’s stance on the
Armenian genocide. Many in Europe feel that Turkey should acknowledge
that the mass killings during and after World War I were genocide, and
the country’s refusal may complicate its attempts to join the European
Union.

Some of Mr. Pamuk’s supporters called it unfortunate that the prize
was awarded on the same day as the French parliamentary vote. They
fear that Turks will see the two events as more evidence that Europe
is treating their country unfairly.

Bulent Arinc, the speaker of the Turkish Parliament, challenged
Mr. Pamuk on Friday to tell the world what he thought about the French
legislation, which Mr. Arinc said `massacres freedom of expression.’

Mr. Pamuk was charged last year with making `anti-Turkish’ remarks
when he called attention to the Armenian genocide during an interview
with a Swiss magazine. Turkish nationalists initiated the criminal
case using a law that makes it a crime to insult Turkish
identity. Europeans and others who decried Mr. Pamuk’s treatment said
Turkey was violating his freedom of expression. After much outside
pressure, the charges were dropped on a technicality.

While the French legislation drew mostly negative reaction here,
Mr. Pamuk’s award inspired praise as well as criticism. Newspaper
writers and some other authors showered him with praise. But others
were more critical.

An arts critic, Ozdemir Ince, implied that Mr. Pamuk had won only
because he presented the view of Turkish history that many Europeans
wanted to hear. `Pamuk, who is given the Nobel Prize, accepts the
Armenian genocide,’ Mr. Ince said. `Turkey has been put on sale, and
Turkish history has been sold in an auction at the lowest price.’

Alev Alatli, a novelist, criticized Mr. Pamuk during an interview on
NTV.

`One of the most powerful institutions of the diaspora Armenians is in
Sweden, and they are very powerful there,’ she said. `Can you imagine
that one could have been even nominated without being in good terms
with these circles?’

Sema Munuklu, 38, a restaurant owner, said: `I don’t think that he
didn’t deserve it. After all, he is a great writer. But I can’t help
thinking that things he said might have been an influence on the
prize.’

Ms. Munuklu said the French Parliament’s action displayed European
hesitancy in accepting Turkey into the European Union.

Ibrahim Unseli, 55, who runs an electronics shop, said he was as
appalled by the French Parliament’s attitude as he was by Mr. Pamuk’s
position on the Armenians and added that he hoped that Turks would
boycott French goods

Beirut: Armenians protest Turkish UNIFIL role

The Daily Star, Lebanon
Oct 13 2006

Armenians protest Turkish UNIFIL role
Demonstrators point to world war I-era massacres

By Iman Azzi
Daily Star staff
Friday, October 13, 2006

BEIRUT: The red, orange and blue stripes of the Armenian flag
fluttered beside the cedar of Lebanon Thursday as thousands of
Lebanese citizens of Armenian descent protested Turkey’s planned
participation in the UN peacekeeping forces patrolling South Lebanon.
"We, the Armenian community, are against the deployment of Turkish
troops in South Lebanon, because of their history as a violent
state," explained Hagop Havatian, spokesman for the ARF Tashnak
Party, the youth party responsible for coordinating Thursday’s
demonstration. "Last week we sent letters to every member of the
Lebanese Parliament asking them to reconsider this issue. We also
sent a letter to [UN Secretary General] Kofi Annan but until now,
these has been no reply."

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their ancestors were slaughtered
in orchestrated killings by Ottoman Turks during World War I, in an
act they maintain can only be seen as genocide. The rally took place
at Beirut’s Martyrs Square, which honors six Lebanese nationalists
who were hanged by the Ottomans during the war.

It was the third such protest organized by the Lebanese-Armenian
community, which is said to number over 200,000. The rally drew a
larger crowd than previous rallies held in front of UN House in
Beirut and in Bourj Hammoud.

"We will continue our refusal in democratic ways," Havatian added.
"This act ignores one of the biggest groups in Lebanon. We are hurt
and feel humiliated and hope the Lebanese government will reconsider
this issue and our feelings."

Razmig Karayan was attending the protest with his girlfriend. "I am
here against the Turks," he said. "I don’t trust them. They are
friends with Israel … They can’t be depended on to work for peace."

A statement circulated at the protest read: "Any participant force in
the UNIFIL should be welcomed by the whole Lebanese society …
Turkey continues to lead a hostile foreign policy in the region,
especially with its immediate neighbors and still occupies northern
Cyprus, continues to blockade Armenia, and refuses to recognize and
apologize for the 1915 Armenian genocide it has perpetrated."

Hundreds of students at Armenian private schools attended the rally
instead of class, some still sporting school uniforms. The protest
grew into a diverse crowd, from babies in strollers to older women
carrying walking sticks and teenagers sporting Armenian flags painted
on their cheeks.

Narine Bouljhourdjian left a class at the American University of
Beirut early to join the protest. She brought a friend on vacation
from Canada, who also was of Armenian descent.

"I believe that Turkey does not have the right to work for peace, not
with their history. Peace and Turkey just don’t correlate," she said.

Behind the two girls, a protester held a sign: "Placing Turkish
troops in Southern Lebanon is an insult to the collective memory of
Lebanon."

Another placard read: "Murderers cannot be peacekeepers."

In total, Turkey is to deploy some 700 soldiers and civil engineers
in Lebanon. Those who landed on Tuesday were the first Muslim
peacekeepers to arrive in the country.

Turkey held a sending-off ceremony Thursday for nearly 260 soldiers
and civil engineers scheduled to depart for the Southern port city
of Tyre on October 19 and are expected to help rebuild damaged
bridges and roads.

Earlier Thursday, French MPs approved a bill making it a crime to
deny that the 1915-1917 massacres of Armenians was genocide,
provoking the fury of the Turkish government. The bill still requires
approval by the French Senate and president Jacques Chirac, neither
of which is expected, to become law.

"What France has done is very good. The Lebanese government should do
the same instead of welcoming Turkish troops," said an elderly
demonstrator who gave his name as Taurus. The Lebanese Parliament
recognized the Armenian genocide in May 2000.

Overriding widespread opposition, the Turkish Parliament approved a
government motion on September 5 to join the United Nations Interim
Force in Lebanon. Turkish peacekeeping troops have also served in
Bosnia and Kosovo and have led international operations in Somalia
and Afghanistan. – With agencies

http://www.dailystar.com.lb

S. Caucasus Mirror Image of Balkans, Armenia, Bulgaria Key States

PanARMENIAN.Net

South Caucasus Mirror Image of Balkans while Armenia
and Bulgaria Are Key States
13.10.2006 14:35 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The South Caucasus is a mirror image of Balkans
while Bulgaria and Armenia are the key states of these regions,
Bulgarian Ambassador to Armenia Stefan Dimitrov said in an interview
with PanARMENIAN.Net. In his words, the Europe’s border goes along the
South Caucasus. `We want the stability and security zone to extend. In
my opinion, Turkey’s possible EU membership will inevitably raise the
Armenian issue. From this standpoint I am glad to witness the
consistent development of the European Neighborhood Policy in Armenia
and the other South Caucasian states. This policy will yield good
fruit in some 10-15 years,’ he said. Stefan Dimitrov voiced assurance
that after the signing of the Action Plan `we should all consider a
new European image of Armenia.’ `We also prepare an interparliamentary
protocol on cooperation. At that I should mention that its
implementation will not depend on the outcomes of elections in either
of the states. The project provides for cooperation on a permanent
institutional basis. The whole negotiation base will be adapted in
view of Bulgaria’s joining the European Union. Our state is obliged to
do this while the adaptation of bilateral agreements is a useful
necessity for Armenia as well within the context of her own European
integration policy, the Ambassador said.

The Nobel Prize 2006

THE NOBEL PRIZE 2006

SR International – Radio Sweden, Sweden
Oct 12 2006

The 2006 Nobel Prizes were announced in Stockholm starting with the
Medicine prize, on the 2nd of October.

The Nobel Prizes are announced out over two week period in Sweden
and Norway.

The prize-awarding institutions are scientific and literary bodies
in Sweden, and a committee elected by the Norwegian Parliament to
choose the peace laureate.

The Swedish institutions invite nominations from past laureates
and selected university professors. For the peace prize, members of
governments and parliaments worldwide can also make nominations.

The Awards

All awards are always presented on the 10th of December, the
anniversary of the death in 1896 of Alfred Nobel, theSwedish
industrialist who set up and financed the prizes.

Occasionally no winner is announced.

The identities of the winners are announced simultaneously, with
citations explaining the choice, at a news conference in the Swedish
capital and by couriers sent to the Stockholm offices of international
news agencies.

The peace prize is announced and awarded in Oslo, the Norwegian
capital. Alfred Nobel designated that the Peace Prize be awarded in
Norway which at the time was joined to Sweden in a political union.

Nobel Committee members almost never discuss their choices in public,
and runners-up aren’t revealed for 50 years.

Each Award is 10 million Swedish kronor, or some $1.4 million US
dollars, plus a diploma, and gold medal. Laureates and their families
are invited to gala ceremonies in Stockholm and Oslo which are followed
by lavish banquets with Scandinavian royalty.

2006 Nobel Medicine Prize

Americans Andrew Z. Fire and Craig C. Mello won the Nobel medicine
prize for discovering a method of turning off selected genes,
an important research tool that scientists hope will lead to new
treatments for HIV, cancer and other illnesses.

The Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm honoured the pair for their
relatively recent discovery of RNA interference, which it called "a
fundamental mechanism for controlling the flow of genetic information."

Fire’s and Mello’s findings, published in 1998, opened a new field
of research that has helped researchers break down, or silence,
specific genes to help neutralize harmful viruses and mutations. RNA
interference occurs in plants, animals, and humans. It is already
being widely used in basic science as a method to study the function
of genes and it may lead to novel therapies in the future. AIDS
researchers hope RNA interference can help them develop new drugs to
fight viruses such as HIV.

"It looks very encouraging today, but it’s too early to say whether it
will find an important place in the therapeutic arsenal" against HIV,
said Goran Hansson, chairman of the prize committee.

Erna Moller, a member of the Nobel Assembly at Karolinska, said RNA
interference has already had a dramatic effect on the pharmaceutical
and biotech industries.

RNA, or ribonucleic acid, is a biomolecule that can store and
transmit genetic information, similar to the role of DNA. In 1989,
Americans Sidney Altman and Thomas Cech were awarded the Nobel Prize
in chemistry for discovering RNA’s catalytic properties.

Fire, 47, of Stanford University, and Mello, 45, of the University
of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, published their seminal
work in the journal Nature in 1998. The two men will share the prize,
including 10 million kronor ($1.4 US dollar million).

The Nobel committees typically honour discoveries that have been
tested over decades, but Hansson said the findings by Fire and Mello
had a big impact even though they were published just eight years ago.

Last year’s medicine prize went to Australians Barry J. Marshall and
Robin Warren for discovering that bacteria, not stress, causes ulcers.

2006 Nobel Physics Prize

Americans John C. Mather and George F. Smoot won the 2006 Nobel Prize
in physics for work that helped cement the big-bang theory of how
the universe was created and deepen understanding of the origin of
galaxies and stars.

The scientists shared the prestigious 10 million kronor ($1.4 million
US dollar) award for discovering the nature of "blackbody radiation"
– cosmic background radiation believed to stem from the big bang –
the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm said.

Mather, 60, and Smoot, 61, based their work on measurements done with
the help of the NASA-launched Cosmic Background Explorer satellite
in 1989. They were able to observe the universe in its early stages
about 380,000 years after it was born. Ripples in the light they
detected also helped demonstrate how galaxies came together over time.

"It is one of the greatest discoveries of the century. I would call
it the greatest. It increases our knowledge of our place in the
universe." Per Carlson, chairman of the Nobel committee for physics.

Mather, works at the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt,
Maryland, and Smoot works at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
in Berkeley, California. Mather said he and Smoot did not realize
how important their work was at the time of their discovery.

However, their work was soon hailed as a major breakthrough.

Mather received standing ovations when he presented the COBE results
to the American Astronomical Society in 1990. After the results were
published in 1992, famed astronomer and author Stephen Hawking called
it "the greatest discovery of the century, if not of all times." By
confirming the predictions of the big-bang theory, which states that
the universe was born of a dense and incredibly hot state billions
of years ago, with direct quantitative evidence, the scientists
transformed the study of the early universe from a largely theoretical
pursuit into a new era of direct observation and measurement.

The COBE project gave strong support for the big-bang theory because
it is the only scenario that predicts the kind of cosmic microwave
radiation measured by the satellite. The academy called Mather the
driving force behind the COBE project while Smoot was responsible
for measuring small variations in the temperature of the radiation.

"The very detailed observations that the laureates have carried out
from the COBE satellite have played a major role in the development
of modern cosmology into a precise science," Royal Swedish Academy
of Sciences

Since 1986, Americans have either won or shared the physics prize
with people from other countries 15 times. Last year, Americans John
L. Hall and Roy J. Glauber and German Theodor W. Haensch won the
prize for work that could lead to better long-distance communication
and more precise navigation worldwide and in space.

2006 Nobel Chemistry Prize

American Roger Kornberg, the son of a Nobel laureate, won the 2006
Nobel chemistry prize for showing how genes are copied, a process
essential to how cells develop and life itself.

Kornberg’s prize came 47 years after he watched his father Arthur
accept the medicine Nobel in Stockholm for his own gene work. It also
crowned the success for U.S. scientists, who have swept all the 2006
Nobel science awards.

The Swedish Academy of Sciences, which makes the10-million-crown
($1.36 US dollar million) award, said Roger Kornberg’s research into
how ribonucleic acid, RNA, moves geneticinformation around the body
was of "fundamental medical importance."

Kornberg’s discovery showed how DNA, which he has describedas a silent
map, is "read" by RNA and converted into a protein within a cell.

Kornberg was 12 when he traveled to Stockholm to see his father receive
the 1959 Nobel for medicine for studies of how genetic information
is ferried from one DNA molecule to another.

As an undergraduate, the younger Kornberg said he briefly considered
majoring in English literature, but his passion for science won out,
he told a news conference at Stanford University in California,
where he and his father both still work.

The Kornbergs are the eighth set of parent and child laureates.

The Swedish Academy of Sciences said the process of gene copying,
or genetic transcription, was central to life.

"(It) is a key mechanism to the biological machinery. If it does not
work, we die,"Per Ahlberg, member of the Nobel Committee for Chemistry

And because the transfer of information helps explain how a cell
becomes a nerve or liver or muscle cell, understanding transcription
is crucial for the development of various therapeutic applications
of stem cells.

Kornberg used a process called X-ray crystallography – in which
molecules in a chemical reaction are "frozen" into crystals and
photographed using X-rays – to capture transcription in action and
in incredible detail. These images showed the complex structure RNA
uses to make this translation.

2006 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences

The 2006 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences has been won by
an American economist who developed theories about unemployment that
better capture how workers and companies actually make decisions
about jobs.

Edmund S. Phelps, 73, a professor at Columbia University in New York,
was cited Monday for research into the relationship between inflation
and unemployment, giving

"Phelps’ work has fundamentally altered our views on how the
macroeconomy operates." Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Phelps told reporters in his New York apartment that he learned of
the prize in a phone call from Sweden that woke him early in the
morning. He said he had waited for the award for a long time, but
wasn’t expecting it this year.

Phelps was born in Chicago and earned his bachelor’s degree at Amherst
College in Amherst, Massachusetts, in 1955 and his Ph.D. at Yale
University in 1959. He has been the McVickar professor of political
economy at Columbia since 1982.

The Swedish academy said the theoretical framework Phelps developed
in the late 1960s helped economists understand the root of soaring
prices and unemployment in the 1970s and the limitations of policies
to deal with these problems. His framework helped central banks shift
their focus toward using inflation expectations to set monetary policy
rather than concentrating on money supply and demand.

Phelps argued that this view did not take workers’ or companies’
decision-making into account, and his research showed that their
expectations about both unemployment andinflation affected their
actions.

Phelps told reporters that his goal was to make economic theory better
reflect the real world. "I’ve been interested in trying to put people
in a more realistic way into our economic models," Phelps said. "In
particular I’ve emphasized that people have to form expectations
about the current state of the world and also expectations about the
future, including the consequences for the future of their actions
in the present."

He said this is not easy because people make decisions with
incomplete information about the state of the world and how the
economy works. "It’s a great big mess, but I think the messiness was
not sufficiently appreciated earlier," he said.

Phelps did his work at a time economists believed that a government
could not lower unemployment without triggering inflation.

The economics prize is the only one of the awards not established in
the will left by Swedish industrialistAlfred Nobel 111 years ago. The
medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peace prizes were first
awarded in 1901, while the economics prize was set up separately by
the Swedish central bank in 1968. It carries an award of $1.4 million
US dollars.

Last year’s laureates were Robert J. Aumann, a citizen of Israel and
the United States, and American Thomas C. Schelling, for their work
in game-theory analysis. Both men were interviewed by Radio Sweden
in Sweden just before they received their award

Nobel Literature Prize

Turkish writer Orhan Pamuk, author of "My Name is Red", "Snow"
and half-a-dozen other novels, won the Nobel Literature Prize on
Thursday for a body of work that probes the crossroads of Muslim and
Western cultures.

The Swedish Academy said Pamuk "in the quest for the melancholic
soul of his native city (Istanbul) has discovered new symbols for
the clash and interlacing of cultures."

The 54-year-old writer is Turkey’s best-known author at home and
abroad, but also a political rebel whose pronouncements on his
country’s history have put its respect for freedom of expression
under the international spotlight.

"In his home country, Pamuk has a reputation as a social commentator
even though he sees himself principally a fiction writer with no
political agenda," the Swedish Academy

Turkey’s decades-old striving to become European – characterized
by clashes between Islam and secularism, tradition and modernity –
along with the painful impact of an aggressive westernization after
the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, permeate Pamuk’s writing.

Pamuk was the first author in the Muslim world to publicly condemn
the 1989 fatwa against Salman Rushdie, and he took a stand for his
Turkish colleague Yasar Kemal when the latter was put on trial in 1995.

Pamuk himself faced prosecution after telling a Swiss newspaper last
year that 30,000 Kurds and one million Armenians had been killed
during World War I under the Ottoman Turks.

The charges against him sparked widespread international protest,
and were dropped earlier this year.

Just hours before the Swedish Academy made its announcement, the
French lower house of parliament approved a bill making it a punishable
offence to deny that the massacre of Armenians constituted genocide.

Pamuk is the first Turk to win the prestigious prize, and had been
rumoured as one of the frontrunners this year. A chain-smoker, he
mostly shuns the public eye, writing for long hours in an Istanbul
flat overlooking the bridge over the Bosphorus linking Europe and Asia.

Born in 1952 into a prosperous, secular family, Pamuk was intent on
becoming a painter in his youth. He studied architecture at Istanbul
Technical University but later turned to writing and studied journalism
in Istanbul.

He published his prize-winning first novel, "Cevdet Bey and His Sons",
in 1982, a family chronicle in which he describes the shift from a
traditional Ottoman family environment to a more Western lifestyle.

His second novel, "The House of Silence", came out in 1983, but it
was his third book, "The White Castle", published two years later,
that gave him an international reputation.

"Structured as a historical novel set in 17th century Istanbul, it is
"on a symbolic level, the European novel captured then allied with
an alien culture," the Swedish Academy.

With the 2000 book "My Name is Red" – a love story, murder mystery and
discussion on the role of individuality in art – Pamuk explores the
relationship between East and West, describing an artist’s different
relationship to his work in each culture.

His latest novel is the critically-acclaimed "Snow", set in Turkey’s
border town of Kars, once a border city between the Ottoman and
Russian empires.

"The novel becomes a tale of love and poetic creativity just as it
knowledgeably describes the political and religious conflicts that
characterise Turkish society of our day," The Swedish Academy

Pamuk will take home the prize sum of 10 million kronor, or some 1.37
million US dollars.

ANKARA: Foreign Ministry Delivers Harsh Reaction To France

FOREIGN MINISTRY DELIVERS HARSH REACTION TO FRANCE

Zaman Online, Turkey
Oct 12 2006

The Foreign Ministry has stated that relations between Turkey and
France received a severe blow with the passing of the controversial
genocide denial bill.

The statement made by the ministry remarked that, "The long-standing
historical relations between Turkey and France, which have grown
through the centuries with great care, have received a severe blow
today because of the irresponsible attempts – based on groundless
claims – of a group of French politicians who are unable to appreciate
the consequences of the policies they follow."

The statement continues: "Despite of all the diplomatic and
parliamentary efforts carried out hand in hand at all levels for
a long time by the Turkish Parliament, our citizens in France, our
non-governmental organizations and business environments; after being
submitted to the French National Assembly by the Socialist Party last
May without any results, the passing of the bill this time on Oct.12,
2006 in the French National Assembly, envisaging severe punishment
for denying the Armenian genocide, has caused a profound grievance."

——————————– ————————————————
S heer Disappointment A statement released said that today’s Armenian
genocide bill would have to go through a long process for it to become
a law.

It must pass through the senate before final approval by the French
president.

Nonetheless, with this first step taken by the French parliament,
the Turkish government is disappointed.

The statement also reassured the Turkish government of efforts by the
French government to put a stop to any progress with the Armenian bill.

"This bill , a violation of both the French constitutional system
that gives the utmost priority to freedom of expression and the
European Treaty that specifies situations when freedom of expression
and of thought can be restricted, goes against the values of liberty,
brotherhood and equality, identified with the French nation, a source
of inspiration for free world," the statement read.

——————————————- ————————————-
A Typical Contradiction In the statement, it is said "It is a typical
contradiction for a country’s parliament to say, by means of top
authorities, that the parliament has no task of rewriting history,
this responsibility belongs to historians when it is about its own
history but assumes a right to judge other states’ history and to
penalize." In the statement it is also mentioned that discussing such
a bill in France is an example of a double standard. The statement
reads as follows:

"Despite important reforms we have realized in recent years in order to
develop fundamental rights and freedoms and in a period when Turkey
is advised to take additional steps on freedom of expression, the
discussion on such topics as the bill in France is another double
standard. A State’s credibility depends on protecting values that
they lay down for others to follow.

This bill takes the freedom of thought and expression hostage in
a way totally contrary to a democratic regime has sparked a deep
outrage in the Turkish nation as well as in our Armenian citizens.

Seventy million Turkish people reject the restriction of freedom of
thought and expression with reference to baseless allegations.

Unfortunately, this bill makes France lose its privileged position
by the Turkish people."