Lavrov, Bayramov discuss implementation of agreements reached between Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan

Save

Share

 19:48, 1 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 1, ARMENPRESS. Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Lavrov met with his Azerbaijani counterpart Jeyhun Bayramov in the sidelines of the session of the Foreign Ministers of the CIS member states.

ARMENPRESS reports, citing the press service of the Russian MFA, the interlocutors discussed the implementation process of the agreements reached on November 9, 2020 and January 11, 2021, which mainly refer to the solution of Nagorno Karabakh’s humanitarian issues and unblocking of economic and transport infrastructures.

Meeting between the Russian and Armenian FMs is currently underway in Moscow.

CivilNet: The Great Diaspora Divide

CIVILNET.AM

27 Mar, 2021 04:03

Just like most societies around the world, the Armenian diaspora is transforming in ways not seen for a century and in some ways unimaginable only a few years ago.  

These transformations have just been exasperated by the defeat of Armenia in the 2020 Artsakh war.  As unpleasant as divisions might be, we must accept them as a sign of a healthy society challenging its basic assumptions and the birth pains of a new conception and understanding of what it means to be an Armenian in the 21st century.

While many will argue that the divisions outlined are simply political in nature, they are in fact indicative of a far wider cultural divide regarding the acceptance or the rejection of a new conception of what it means to be an Armenian in the diaspora. These cultural divisions are also the lens by which the current Armenian political struggle is seen by the diaspora.  

The most consistent worldwide trend today is that all forms of authority are being challenged. This includes religious institutions, political parties, cultural organizations, the military, big business, and “traditional” family structures. There are many reasons for this, but the primary drives are that large numbers of people especially among the younger generations across the world have come to believe that these traditional institutions do not have answers to the crisis facing our contemporary world.  Many actually see traditional sources of authority as having betrayed the current generation of young people. 

In the case of the Western diaspora many among the younger generation, like their non-Armenian cohorts, have come to understand that they will have less economic security and prospects than their parents’ generation.ll around them they observe the systems of authority as being incompetent and inept, recently exemplified by the disastrous response to the Covid crisis in almost every western country. The traditional leadership is perceived to be unable or unwilling to deal with catastrophic challenges like climate change, mass migration, failing education systems and lack of middle class jobs. 

This great transformation has reached the front door of our Armenian communities all over the world, especially in the West where people enjoy greater political freedoms. The younger generation of politically active Armenians in the diaspora does not see any of our traditional institutions either speaking for them or being responsive to their needs and their ideas. 

This detachment, however, does not mean they do not care about their community or what happens in Armenia.  They see being Armenian as part of a larger struggle of rights, and they are in solidarity with other persecuted groups from around the world. They see Armenians as just another one of the crucified peoples of history and not Europeans that happen to live in the wrong part of the world.  In ideological terms, they identify far more with the Armenian flavored internationalism of a Monte Melkonian than the blood and land nationalism of a Garegin Njdeh. 

Unsurprisingly, the progressive younger Armenian diaspora was the strongest supporter of the 2018 revolution abroad.  All the while the traditional diaspora organizations were busy trying to save the old regime until its end became inevitable. 

A fact that went unnoticed last year was that during that summer’s anti-police violence uprising/riots in the United States, young Armenians were active in the front lines of both the Black Lives Matter protests and in the Covid period “Cancel The Rent” movements.  All the while, the older generations were very much identifying with the other sides of these struggles. 

What was seen as contradictions for the diaspora of the past generations is now the lens in which younger generations perceive their own identity as Armenians. 

The push back against this generational divide by the diaspora that is more traditionally minded has been very harsh. Traditionalists correctly see the new generation and their progressive ideas as an existential threat to the traditional concepts of what it means to be Armenian. 

Prior to the war this reaction manifested itself in attacks or complaints about the perceived Western-style liberalism of the Pashinyan’s government in its support for women’s rights and tolerance for LGBT Armenians.  In reality, these positions were being greatly exaggerated.  Regardless, traditional minded Armenians saw these ideas as anti-Armenian and pushed by nefarious foreign funded NGOs to destroy traditional Armenian institutions and traditional moralities. 

What eventually made these divisions into a chasm was the defeat in the 2020 Artsakh War — an event which until the signing of the ceasefire deal had actually for 44 days united Armenians across all these ideological divisions. 

Since then the war has become the symbolic tool used in our communities’ current culture war used by each side to advance their arguments and to make their case as to why theirs is the correct path to follow. 

The traditional minded diaspora Armenians blame the defeat on either the incompetence or treasonous actions of the current government. They claim that the Pashinyan government is too western and liberal and was moving the country dangerously out of the Russian orbit while supporting movements that undermined traditional Armenian values. In some extreme cases, they actually blame the democratization process of the country itself as a reason for our defeat. Most importantly they ideologically place the reasons for the defeat as a lack of fidelity to the older conceptions of patriotism and Armenianness.

A prime example of the disconnect between the traditionalist diaspora leadership and the progressives was the collaboration of the traditionalists among the diaspora’s different religious, political and civic leadership in asking for the resignation of the Pashinyan government. These calls  were met with indifference in Armenia itself and seen by the progressive diaspora as an attempt by reactionary forces to use the war to undo the post revolution democratization of the Armenian state and society.

The younger or more progressive-minded Armenians in the diaspora  blame the defeat on 25 years of incompetence and corruption. In their view the corrupt political class did not allow Armenia to build a competent and just economy, a real working state or a functional military.  In many cases they blamed the leadership of our traditional diaspora institutions as being complicit in the corrupt regimes of Armenia.

There is little doubt which side is likely to win this culture war.  The forces of social liberalism have, in the long run, always crushed their traditionalist opponents in almost every western country in the world. 

It is important for all of us to understand that these kinds of culture wars are luxuries only larger nations can afford. It is imperative for our diaspora institutions to begin asking the hard questions as to how they can engage the younger generation in ways that are responsive to their needs and ideas.  At the same time they should become real partners in the process of democratic state building in Armenia and avoid being used as the handmaidens of an Armenia based kakistocracy. 

Reformers have to understand that however our nation is to be transformed it needs to be done our way.  We do not need to become a copy of a copy. We can become more tolerant, open minded and work in solidarity with others while preserving the uniqueness of our cultural traditions.

Our collective task is to create this synthesis where the fresh ideas of the new generation are married to the best of our cultural traditions.  This is the only way to ensure the long term survival of the Armenian diaspora, at the same time establishing real partnerships to build a functional, democratic and prosperous Armenia of which   we can all be proud. 

Armenpress: Issue of Constitutional amendments remains on Government’s agenda – PM Pashinyan

Issue of Constitutional amendments remains on Government's agenda – PM Pashinyan

Save

Share

 17:46,

YEREVAN, MARCH 24, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan assured that the issue of Constitutional amendments remains on the agenda of the Government, ARMENPRESS reports Pashinyan said during parliament-Cabinet Q&A session, answering the question of independent MP Arman Babajanyan.

Babajanyan noted that the PM and the President had disccused issues related to improving the Constitutional and ligislative fields, and asked the PM to make some clarifications.

''I said that based on the analysis of the situation and conditioned by the well-known factors, the issue of Constitutional amendments remain on our agenda, but it’s necessary to discuss its parameters and content and try to reach an agreement’’, the PM said.

President to hold meetings with Parliament Majority Leader Makunts and opposition LHK’s Edmon Marukyan

President to hold meetings with Parliament Majority Leader Makunts and opposition LHK's Edmon Marukyan

Save

Share

 12:35,

YEREVAN, MARCH 13, ARMENPRESS. President Armen Sarkissian will hold meetings with Parliament Majority Leader Lilit Makunts (My Step bloc) and opposition Bright Armenia (LHK) leader Edmon Marukyan, the presidency said.

Sarkissian is also expected to meet with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan today.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Artsakh search and rescue mission still halted due to bad weather

Save

Share

 11:46, 9 March, 2021

STEPANAKERT, MARCH 9, ARMENPRESS. Artsakh rescuers won’t resume search operations for missing troops today because of heavy snowfalls.

The State Service of Emergency Situations said they will restart the operations as soon as weather conditions allow it.

The search and rescue mission was halted on March 8 due to fog and low visibility.

So far, Artsakh rescuers retrieved the remains of 1490 servicemen and civilians since the 2020 November 10 ceasefire was signed. 

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Congressman Pallone asks Biden Administration to address issue of Armenian captives and Azerbaijan’s gross violations

Save

Share

 13:21, 8 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 8, ARMENPRESS. Congressman Frank Pallone says he personally spoke with US President Joe Biden’s Administration over the issue of the Armenian captives whom Azerbaijan refuses to return after the Artsakh war.

“Azerbaijan committed gross human rights abuses during last year's conflict. They continue to detain hundreds of Armenians in violation of international law. I have personally spoken with the Biden Administration to immediately address these issues,” Pallone tweeted.

Artsakh parliament: Karabakh territories now under Azerbaijan control are considered occupied

News.am, Armenia
March 1 2021

The Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) National Assembly has issued a statement.

"The National Assembly of the Artsakh Republic reaffirms that on September 2, 1991, the independence of the Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) Republic was declared on the basis of USSR legislation and norms of international law; the Artsakh Republic, as a party to the conflict, participated in the ongoing negotiations within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group in various formats in 1992-2020.

(…) the National Assembly of the Artsakh Republic states:

1. The Artsakh Republic territories that have ended up under the control of Azerbaijan so far are considered occupied by the Republic of Azerbaijan;

2. Azerbaijan's aggression against the Artsakh Republic and the occupation of the mentioned territories cannot have any legal effect in the process of determining the status and borders of the Artsakh Republic during future negotiations," the statement reads in part.

Armenian Bar Calls Out Grey Wolves to U.N. Special Rapporteur on Racism

March 4, 2021



United Nations

In response to a call for input by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance, Armenian Bar Association associate members Astghik Hairapetian, Anoush Baghdassarian, Mariam Nazaretyan, and Dickran Khodanian, prepared a report submitted to the U.N. Special Rapporteur.

The purpose of the report is to help stop the activities of the Grey Wolves before they further realize their racist worldview. The Grey Wolves’ vitriol and invective have become increasingly evident, especially during Azerbaijan’s recent aggression against Artsakh.

The mandate of the Special Rapporteur and UCLA Law School Professor E. Tendayi Achiume is to combat and prevent varied forms of racism, racial discrimination, anti-Semitism, xenophobia, and related intolerance. Not only do these established forms of racism exist, they are continually changing. To combat such violations of basic human rights, the Special Rapporteur transmits urgent appeals and communications to States regarding alleged violations of international human rights law, performs country visits, and submits reports to the UN Human Rights Council and the General Assembly.

To inform the Special Rapporteur’s 2021 report to the Human Rights Council on combatting the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism, and other practices that fuel contemporary forms of racism and related intolerance, Special Rapporteur Achiume requested written submissions from civil society organizations and other stakeholders who can share their experience and knowledge. To this end, the Armenian Bar’s submission details the harmful and intolerant activities of the Grey Wolves, a group whose ideology is characterized by exaggerated nationalism and racist violence against ethnic minorities in Turkey and around the world and, in particular, against Armenians.

Lucy Varpetian, Chairwoman of the Armenian Bar Association, commented, “In a time when ultra-nationalist policies propel discrimination and violence in many parts of the world, we applaud the Special Rapporteur’s commitment to receiving substantiated reports about the full scope of the threat of neo-Nazism and related practices. We hope that the diverse submissions will lead to a thematic report that highlights this trend in all its forms and serves to oppose it.”

The report details who the Grey Wolves are, their acts against Armenians and other groups, including in the military context, Turkey and Azerbaijan’s support of the group, and European governments’ policies to combat the group. It concludes by stating: “Particularly in the context of Erdogan’s Pan-Turkic expansionist vision from the Mediterranean to Libya and beyond, and Turkey’s illicit use of armed force to reach its objectives, it is critical to understand the radical ideological streams undergirding the politics of the region and around the world. The Grey Wolves and its sympathizers drive racist violence towards ethnic minorities. The group should be understood as a dangerous ideology paralleling Nazism in form – in light of indications of state support – and in substance – in light of explicit calls for the eradication of certain ethnic groups. Azerbaijan’s aggression towards Artsakh and its Armenians is both a recent manifestation of this dangerous ideology, and a warning of a disturbing, growing trend.

A Group Of Israelis Secretly Built And Tested Suicide Drones For An Unknown Asian Customer

The Drive
Feb 11 2021



THOMAS NEWDICK

Agroup of more than 20 Israelis, among them former defense officials, are under investigation for allegedly illegally designing, producing, and selling “armed loitering missiles,” also known as “suicide drones,” to an unnamed Asian country. The news comes less than two weeks after the announcement of three legitimate sales of these kinds of weapons by the Israeli arms industry, including to unnamed Asian countries.

The Israeli Police today confirmed the investigation, which has been run “in recent months” in cooperation with the country’s Shin Bet state security service. In a statement posted on Twitter, the Israeli Police explained that the suspects had secretly received instructions “from entities related to the same country,” in exchange for “considerable funds” paid to them, as well as other undisclosed benefits. The investigation was conducted by the Unit for International Crime Investigations, part of the Police’s Lahav 433 division, which is otherwise primarily responsible for investigating national crimes and corruption. As already noted, Shin Bet was also involved, as was Israel’s National Security Council.

“The Israelis are suspected of national security offenses, breaching arms exports laws, money laundering and other financial offenses,” the Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported. “The investigation continues. The details of the investigation and the identities of the suspects are under a gag order.”

The alleged crimes include offenses against the security of the state, violations of the law on the supervision of security exports, money laundering, and other economic offenses.

“This case illustrates the potential damage to the security of the country due to illegal deals conducted by Israeli citizens with foreign entities,” said a spokesperson for Shin Bet, as reported in the Jerusalem Post. “It also raises fears that technology will get into the hands of enemy countries,” they added.

Israel has sought to increase the regulation around its defense exports in recent years, with the aim of preventing companies from knowingly selling weapons to countries that have committed severe human rights violations.

Under the Law For Oversight of Defense Exports, the Israeli Ministry of Defense must consult with the Foreign Ministry in all weapons sales to foreign countries, weighing up the potential impact on foreign policy and diplomatic relations. Since the law was passed in 2007, the Foreign Ministry has much greater power to veto arms transfers, although they, in turn, can be overruled by the government’s security cabinet. Ironically, in light of the current case, this regulation was introduced, in part, due to the planned sale of intelligence-gathering drones to China, which was eventually canceled due to pressure from the United States.

The Israeli Police have released video and photos of the loitering munitions. A brief video clip, with two timestamps showing August and November 2019, shows one of the weapons being tested, with several individuals gathered beside two cars before it’s launched, almost vertically. The Times of Israel reports that the Police confirmed this test took place “near a residential area” in the center of the country. 

Broadly speaking, suicide drones have the advantages of being small, maneuverable, and hard to detect, as well as being relatively inexpensive. Even a relatively basic loitering munition, offering a man-in-the-loop control system would provide a very useful weapon in many scenarios, especially in asymmetric warfare. Other benefits of these kinds of weapons include the ability for the operator to abort the strike, even at the very last moment, or make manual adjustments to improve accuracy. Generally, suicide drones are very precise while also providing additional means to help avoid collateral damage, capabilities you can read about in more detail in this previous War Zone piece.

While the loitering munition in question appears to have been launched initially using a rocket motor, a photo showing the drones being manufactured in a workshop reveals that it also seems to have a propeller at the rear, for the cruise phase of its flight. The drone itself has a tubular body with large cruciform center-body wings, plus smaller cruciform fins at the tail end. Overall, the drone seems to be broadly reminiscent of an Israeli guided missile, the SPIKE-NLOS, produced by Rafael, although this doesn’t use a propeller engine.

It is not known what guidance system the drone used. Typically, these kinds of weapons can use a man-in-the-loop control system that allows their human operator to see what the drone sees, via a set of electro-optical and/or infrared video cameras, throughout the entire course of its flight.

The more sophisticated models now available offer a degree of autonomy, with the ability to automatically detect, categorize, and track various types of targets. Increasingly common are operating modes in which the drones can proceed to strike the desired targets without any further need for human input.

While it’s unclear whether these more advanced guidance methods were available to the individuals responsible for building these illicit drones, the fact that former defense officials were involved in the plot suggests that they may at least have a significant understanding of these technologies.

Israel is notably already one of the main developers of loitering munitions, or suicide drones, including the Harop that was developed by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). Less than two weeks ago, The War Zone reported about how the maritime version of that weapon had recently secured what was apparently its first order, from another unnamed Asian country. The navalized Harop sale was announced alongside a deal with “another customer in Asia” for standard ground-launched versions of that weapon and a sale of IAI’s rotary-winged loitering munition Rotem to a different “foreign country.”

It’s no exaggeration to say that Israel essentially pioneered the concept of loitering munitions, inspired by its early use of drones to help destroy and confuse hostile air defenses during the Yom Kippur War in 1973. In the conflicts that followed, Israel refined its use of drones to help overwhelm air defense batteries, as well as for surveillance. Drones intended for such high-risk missions became increasingly expendable, leading to the Harpy, which was intended to loiter and then home in on threat radar frequencies, destroying the air defense systems itself. As perhaps the first “loitering munition,” the Harpy is the ancestor of today’s Harop, and you can read more about it here.

Of course, it is in the interests of some countries to obscure the details of arms transfers from Israel, in the case of legitimate sales. Political sensitivities are often the reason for Israeli arms deals with international customers being little-publicized by either party, the recent Harop and Rotem sales perhaps being a case in point. Meanwhile, in the case of the illicit loitering munitions, there is a suggestion that the political ramifications could be significant, too. “Sources with knowledge of the investigation said the case was highly sensitive, as it could affect Israel’s foreign relations and lead to a rift between superpowers,” tweeted the editor of the English-language edition of Haaretz, Avi Scharf. 

Loitering munitions, in general, have been a topic of major international discussion since Azerbaijan used ground-launched Harops to decisive effect in its conflict with Armenia over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region last year. You can read more about this fighting, and the role that drones played in it, in our previous reporting on that conflict.

In this context, it is also worth noting that one Israeli company has previously run into trouble in connection with its involvement in an incident in Nagorno-Karabakh back in 2017. That year, Aeronautics Limited was accused of fraud and violating the country’s export controls for military equipment. This was reportedly the result of an incident in Azerbaijan in which executives from the company “demonstrated” the capabilities of their Orbiter 1K suicide drone by flying a very real strike on Armenian-backed forces in Nagorno-Karabakh. You can read all about that here. 

The fact that a fairly small group of individuals can also construct and test, in secret, an apparently functioning loitering munition should also provide pause for thought for the nations around the world that face a potential threat from militia groups or terror organizations. Following their use in the conflict in Yemen, the proliferation of these kinds of weapons in the hands of other non-state actors would seem to be just a matter of time. 

Until we know the intended customer of these illegally produced drones, it is difficult to know exactly what kind of scenario they were intended to be used in. However, it seems safe to say that the performance of Israeli-made loitering munitions in last year’s Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has helped make these kinds of weapons something of a “must-have” among armed forces around the world.


Lieutenant General joins General Staff’s statement demanding PM Pashinyan’s resignation

News.am, Armenia
Feb 28 2021

Former Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Armenian Armed Forces, Lieutenant General Haykaz Bagmanyan joins the statement of the General Staff, officers, commanders of the Armed Forces units demanding the resignation of PM Nikol Pashinyan and the government.

"I don’t think the Armed Forces didn’t think about this statement. I believe that they have made a serious decision, and I join him, I support him. The defeated leader of the country cannot remain in office; on November 10, he was supposed to resign," the general told 168.am.

Commenting on the allegations that the statement of the General Staff of the Armenian Armed Forces is actually interference in the internal political processes, the general noted: "The army does not interfere in political affairs, it is a matter of the country's security." 

Haykaz Bagmanyan believes that both the police and the National Security Service have the willpower not to follow Nikol Pashinyan's orders.