Russia’s Staff Out Of Tbilisi

RUSSIA’S STAFF OUT OF TBILISI

Dec. 25, 2006

The headquarter premises of Transcaucasia’s Troops of Russia in central
Tbilisi have been officially handed in to Georgian Defense Ministry
Saturday. Georgia will auction the premises for at least $20 million
in the next move.

By the day of transfer of headquarter premises, four trains had driven
machinery and equipment of Russia’s garrison away from Tbilisi. The
destination of two trains was Armenia, Gumri military base of Russia,
while the remaining two trains left Georgia for the home country.

The officers that were the last to pull out of Tbilisi headquarters
went either to Russia or to Armenia, though 13 officers headed for the
Georgian city of Batumi to continue the service and coordinate final
withdrawal of Russia’s military from Akhalkalaki base and Batumi that
is to be completed by 2007 and 2008 respectively.

The location of former staff of Russia’s military in Tbilisi is
extremely advantageous. It is the very downtown of Georgian capital
just between two districts of local elite – Vake and Saburtalo.

With the Russians out of Tbilisi, the premises will probably change
the owner. They could be transferred from Defense Ministry of Georgia
to Economy Ministry of the country. More likely than not, they will
be sold via an auction held with the starting price of at least $20
million. In that part of Tbilisi, a square meter of housing costs
$700 to begin with, and the price goes up to $1,500 once a building
frame is constructed.

www.kommersant.com

Robert Kocharian Sent Letter Of Condolence To Turkmen People

ROBERT KOCHARIAN SENT LETTER OF CONDOLENCE TO TURKMEN PEOPLE

PanARMENIAN.Net
21.12.2006 17:32 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian President Robert Kocharian sent a
letter of condolence to the government of Turkmenistan in regard
of President Sapamurat Niyazov’s death, the Press Office of the
president reports. In his telegram Kocharian in particular says,"
In Armenia we accepted Saparmurat Niyazov’s death message with
grief. On my and the Armenian people name I express condolence to
Turkmen authorities and people, the relatives and family members of
President Niyazov. Saparmurat Niyazov has been ruling the country
since independent Turkmenistan and was its unchangeable leader. We
appreciate his contribution to the establishment and development of
Armenian- Turkmen relations. I am sure that the Turkmenian people
will continue to make efforts to prosper the homeland, strengthen the
statehood and sovereignty of Turkmenistan." It is worth mentioning
that Saparmurat Niyazov died in the result of sudden heartbreak on
the night of December 21.

Lights Of Hope Shine Out In Bethlehem, Thanks To Hamas

LIGHTS OF HOPE SHINE OUT IN BETHLEHEM, THANKS TO HAMAS
by Stephen Farrell, Bethlehem

The Times (London)
December 21, 2006, Thursday

Bethlehem’s festive lighting engineers have been working for 26 days
and have decorated half of Star Street. Their labour is a true act of
Christmas charity: they have not been paid for four months because of
the Western freeze on Palestinian aid after Hamas’s election victory
this year.

But it will take more than the 8,000 metres of cable being strung up
by Samaan Shaheen, a Christian city engineer, and his Muslim colleague
Khalil to cheer up the birthplace of Christianity.

British church leaders will arrive in Bethlehem to offer some support
to the troubled city today.

Dr Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Cardinal Cormac
Murphy- O’Connor, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, the Rev
David Coffey, the Moderator of the Free Churches, and Bishop Nathan
Hovhannisian, Primate of the Armenian Church of Great Britain, will
make the long walk from the Israeli Jerusalem-Bethlehem checkpoint to
Manger Square. Their visit was welcomed by Archbishop Michel Sabbah,
the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, who said that it was a reminder
"to us, to the Israelis and the Palestinians, and to the world,
that the pilgrims’ path of hope and love must remain open".

In his Christmas message Archbishop Sabbah said: "Bethlehem is meant
to be the city of peace. Unfortunately, it is now just the contrary
-a city of conflict and death."

Bethlehem is sunk in gloom: sealed off from Jerusalem by Israel’s
wall, its tourism crippled by six years of intifada and war and
by Western sanctions against the Islamist Hamas-led Palestinian
Authority. Politics even infest Christmas.

Khalil and Samaan, who has been erecting lights for 23 years, joke
that yellow is the only safe colour left for the Nativity lights
this year: red would be too Popular Front and green too Hamas, as
the Islamist faction endures an uneasy truce with Fatah. But why,
Khalil wonders, can Bethlehem afford to beautify itself at £ 2.50
per metre of festive lights -bought or donated from Nazareth -when
their salaries have gone unpaid since late summer? "How do you think
it makes me feel? I don’t have half a shekel and I have a sick son
who needs dialysis that I can’t afford," he says.

The answer, Bethlehem’s Christian and Muslim councillors sigh in
unison, is that private and corporate donors are happy to contribute
in cash or kind for the festivities, but the municipality’s running
costs and £ 52,000 monthly salary bill are paid through taxes and
other revenues.

These have dried up because of the economic crisis begun by the
Israeli-Palestinian violence, and compounded by the Western boycott
on the Palestinian Authority. "We are isolated, anyone can see that,"
says Saleh Shoukeh, one of Bethlehem’s five Hamas councillors.

"Nevertheless we want to show the world that we are united here in
this city, Christian and Muslim, and that the City of Bethlehem should
be augmented with decorations on an international holiday."

The upshot was that local donors were asked to contribute, and
came forward.The Hamas-led Government -as eager as its Arafat-led
predecessor to be seen to be supporting Palestinian Christians -has
also promised tens of thousands of pounds for decorations.

Bethlehem had a majority of Christians until the late 1970s, but
that is now down to 45 per cent of the city’s 30,000 population, and
20 per cent in the wider district, said Anton Salman, a Christian
council member with Fatah. Before the outbreak of the intifada in
2000, Bethlehem drew more than 1.2 million pilgrims a year; only a
tenth of that number come now.

Back on the decoration round, Samaan gets on well with his Muslim
colleague, but as elsewhere in the region there is unease among
Christians about being caught between vastly more numerous -and
well-armed -enemies.

The two Bethlehem engineers will reach the square shortly before
Christmas Eve, to fit the last of the sparkling decorations.

–Boundary_(ID_TA248dFTPDYAZfGj8EP9N A)–

Georgia Assures That Dec 20 Evening Russian Gas Supplies To Armenia

GEORGIA ASSURES THAT DEC 20 EVENING RUSSIAN GAS SUPPLIES TO ARMENIA WILL BE RESUMED

Yerevan, December 20. ArmInfo. The Georgian side assures that today
evening the Russian gas supplies to Armenia will be resumed.

Spokesperson of ArmRosgazprom Shushan Sardaryan says that the Georgian
sides is actively restoring the pipeline damaged by avalanche Dec 16.

Presently, Armenia is receiving 1/3 of the necessary amount of gas
via reserve pipeline – 130,000 c m/hour. The rest is supplied from
the Abovyan underground gas storage.

China Doesn’t Stand Aloof From The Karabakh Conflict Either

CHINA DOESN’T STAND ALOOF FROM THE KARABAKH CONFLICT EITHER

PanARMENIAN.Net
19.12.2006 GMT+04:00

Each side hears from the diplomats what it wants to.

Probably very few countries are left in the world, which, according to
Azeri Press do not support the territorial integrity of the Republic
of Azerbaijan regarding the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
regulation. China didn’t stand aloof from the issue either. According
to APA (Azeri Press Agency) Press-Secretary of the Chinese Ministry of
Foreign Affairs Guin Guang announced, "China respects the integrity
of the Republic of Azerbaijan, its sovereignty and supports the
Resolution of UN Security Council on Nagorno-Karabakh".

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ China, of course, is a large country and is a member
of UN Security Council and has a right of veto. Its opinion, like
the opinion of the other countries, is vital. The fact is that the
Azeri Mass Media so often disseminates such misinformation, that the
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs is hardly believed to have made
such an announcement. And even if it is so, then it means, that the
World Community, is poorly informed about the conflict and moreover
about the UN Resolutions, for which the same China voted in 1993. By
the way, Resolutions are much spoken about in Azerbaijan; however
the text itself isn’t quoted. In the meantime, the UN Resolutions are
estimated by forces, which have taken control of several Azeri regions,
like the "local Armenian forces", and in this way the statement of
the official Azerbaijan concerning the participation of the RA Armed
Forces in these developments is rejected.

Besides, the mentioned documents of UN Security Council call for
taking all the necessary measures in the region and solving the
existing problems (withdrawal of troops, reestablishment of economic,
transportation and power links in the region, returning of the
displaced persons, negotiations within the frames of OSCE Minsk Group,
as well as direct contact between the sides with the aim of coming to a
final decision etc.) There were only four of them: UN Security Council
Resolution N 822, 29.04.93; UN Security Council Resolution N853,
29.06.93; UN Security Council Resolution N874, 14.10.93, UN Security
Council Resolution N884, 11.11.93. It is obvious, that it is not
handy for Azerbaijan to be reminded of the kernel of these documents;
moreover, probably Baku hopes that nobody remembers what was stated
in them, so they may interpret them in the way they would like them to.

On the other hand each country hears from the diplomats what
it wants to. That’s our neighbors – the whole world is for the
territorial integrity, only for some reason the nation’s right on
self-determination is always affixed to it. Even if we admit, that
such announcements supporting the Azerbaijani positions regarding the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict regulation have been made by countries like
China, Japan, Korea then it must have been dictated by the momentary
dependence of the mentioned countries on Azerbaijan.

In the end, it’s all the same for all of them how the confrontations
in Nagorno-Karabakh will end. In this very case China is interested
in energy vectors, which are skillfully implemented by Azerbaijan. It
is not by accident that earlier the Chinese side has expressed its
readiness to assign financial support for Kars-Akhalkalaki-Baku
railroad construction. However, this is not enough either to make
such kind of announcements. Strangely enough, China has been silent
regarding the Nagorno-Karabakh referendum so far.

"PanARMENIAN.Net" analytical department

Zharangutiun Party Leader’s Meeting With Vanadzor Residents Fails

ZHARANGUTIUN PARTY LEADER’S MEETING WITH VANADZOR RESIDENTS FAILS

Noyan Tapan
Dec 19 2006

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 19, NOYAN TAPAN. Zharangutiun (Heritage) Party leader
Raffi Hovannisian’s meeting with residents of Vanadzor scheduled for
December 16 at Vanadzor H.Abelian State Dramatic Theater failed. Noyan
Tapan was informed about it from the Party’s Press Service. According
to the report, in spite of the agreement on renting the area reached
in advance and the agreement signed by the established order, the
theater leadership refused to provide them the territory on a number
of invented pretexts. In spite of this, many residents of Vanadzor
gathered in the square near the theater. Vardan Khachatrian, Chairman
of the Party’s Board, answered their questions. The latter declared
that against the obstacles, "Raffi Hovannisian will realize his right
of RA citizen and both in Vanadzor and in any place of Armenia will
frankly and openly speak with the people." According to the report,
the authorities’ affirmations that equal conditions and rights are
provided for all political figures in Armenia do not correspond to
reality. "Moreover, within the framework of the order from above,
all RA TV companies, both state and private, are closed before the
Zharangutiun’s founder," the party’s report read.

Bulgarians And The Roma: Who’s More Wrong?

BULGARIANS AND THE ROMA: WHO’S MORE WRONG?
Yana Moyseeva, The Sofia Echo

Dzeno Association, Czech Republic
Dec 18 2006

Bulgaria’s transition to democracy after 1989 was harder than anyone
expected. New democratic and socialist rulers at the time misjudged
what was needed to quickly make Bulgaria a free-market economy,
a task that countries like Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic
managed. The ultimate consequence of those misjudgments in the early
days of the republic was an economic catastrophe that resulted in
fever-pitch unemployment and a drastic decrease in living standards.

But hardest hit were the Roma. Their social and economic situation
severely deteriorated as a consequence of the post-communist
transition. Roma unemployment skyrocketed up to 90 per cent during the
1990s. Their level of education also fell at great speed. A recent
survey reveals that only 10 per cent of Roma aged 10 and above have
completed primary education, as opposed to 72 of Bulgarians. As a
result, many Roma saw no other option but to earn their bread through
social benefits and, alas, crime.

Today human rights activists, NGOs, politicians and the media continue
to argue who is right and wrong on the Roma’s condition in Bulgarian
society. Some argue that too many preserve stereotypes about the
Roma. Others argue that they simply base their perceptions of the Roma
on Roma behaviour. Meanwhile, the integrated Roma are absent from the
public view. The media still mostly emphasise negative stories. To
a great extent, this coverage is why the perception of the "dirty,
lazy, stealing Roma" remains unchanged to date. The voice of the Roma
themselves is lost. Politicians, journalists, NGO representatives –
we hear a lot through them about what everybody else thinks. But it
is time we hear from both non-Roma and Roma themselves about the idea
of living in an integrated society.

A study done with non-Roma and Roma showed that integration is easy
in words, but difficult in practice.

Through the eyes of the ordinary Bulgarians, Roma integration means
everything from "paying your bills" to "taking responsibility as well
as using your rights". Mainly, it involves "getting a smaller group,
which is somehow different from the majority, to live by the rules
and principles on which the entire society is based, to take into
consideration the established norms of behaviour, whether they are
social, cultural, or health."

But is that really enough?

Bulgaria has been a multi-ethnic society for centuries. Turks,
Armenians, Jews and Russians are only some of the minorities currently
living in Bulgaria. However, it is a fact that other minorities are
hardly ever mentioned in the public space. "This is because nobody
else creates as many problems as the Roma," said Anait Kirkorova,
a teacher in a so-called white school from an Armenian background.

The interviewed Bulgarians acknowledged that it is wrong to think
that all Roma are the same. Some are already integrated, they say –
they are educated, work, pay taxes, and obey the law like everybody
else. But examples of such integrated Roma are rare.

One of the most widely spread opinions about the Roma is that they
are highly criminal, especially regarding pick pocketing, electricity
stealing and burglary. Bulgarians especially say they resent how Roma
are caught stealing electricity but the Government forgives them,
as their lines are re-connected without payment or sanctions.

As a result, Bulgarians irritably say "Why are they allowed to get
away with this, but as soon as we don’t pay ours, we remain without
electricity until we pay the bill?" Bulgarians admit that when they
go on a bus and a group of Roma gets on, it is almost an instant
reaction to grab hold of their bags or pockets and stay alert for
the duration of the trip.

This fear comes as no surprise when looking at crime figures.

Even though official crime statistics on an ethnic basis are not
carried out in Bulgaria, some figures compiled in 2002 from the
Bulgarian police claim that Roma commit one in four crimes. Even if
such figures are unofficial, Bulgarians point towards higher criminal
rates among Roma than among Bulgarians.

The visibly higher birth rate among the Roma also puts Bulgarians
on alert.

Currently the birth rate among Roma is three to four times higher
than among Bulgarians. A common belief is that many Roma give birth
to children to use them as a means for getting easy money, mainly
through claiming children state benefits. "For the Romany gypsies,
children are not an expense, but a profit," said Nona Kuzmanova,
a teacher in a mixed school. Single mother Elizabet Ivanova added,
"When I go to take my child benefits, I join a queue mainly with
Roma women, surrounded by children". In July, Social Minister Emilia
Maslarova said 70 per cent of all 117 000 jobless who received state
benefits in the first five months of the year were Roma.

Bulgarians are also convinced that Roma exploit their children for
begging and pick-pocketing. A number of people have personally
offered a begging Roma child in the street to buy him/her food,
but in response the child said it wanted money instead. All of the
interviewed Bulgarians were convinced that if a Roma family has four
children, it can earn more money from child support benefits than
if both parents were earning the minimum wage of 180 leva. Thus,
Bulgarians said, it is not the case that there are no jobs; rather
they simply don’t want to work because "It is easier to have more
children and make the most of welfare," the interviewees claimed.

Experiences of hiring or working with Roma are also negative. "They
would always try to get away with doing as little as possible, leave
work earlier than everyone else and on top – not do the job properly,"
said Konstantin Kirilov, a company director. In the eyes of Bulgarians
this work ethic raised a question as to whether the Roma actually
want to be integrated.

Some Bulgarians argue that most Roma don’t want to be integrated
because this requires making an effort. "They run away when the first
obstacle comes along. Why make an effort if you can choose the easy
way and carry on living day by day," argues Yordanka Pochinkova,
a social worker. But others believe that no one would choose misery
if given the option for a better life, such as having a job, a house
or access to quality education.

Although some Bulgarians express the rather extreme view that "Roma’s
low intelligence has turned into a genetic attribute as a consequence
of their primitive way of life during centuries," most Bulgarians
interviewed agree that the problems are rooted mainly in their lack
of education.

According to data compiled in 2001, 15 per cent of the Roma population
are illiterate, 30 per cent have only elementary education and
another 30 per cent have finished eighth grade, the required
minimum by law. Only five per cent have finished twelfth, or final,
grade and less than one per cent hold a university degree. The
lack of education and the high illiteracy among the Roma makes them
uncompetitive. According to Konstantin Kirilov "No job means poverty,
and poverty is a prerequisite for defects in society". But this
situation has much to do with the efficiency of the Government.

Compulsory primary education and sanctions for those caught not
sending their children to school exist even now. But the evident
poor state of the great majority of Roma speaks for a massive lack of
oversight. Roma children often drop out of school, a fact admitted by
the Government. Each year ten million Euros are given on average by
American and EU funds for various Roma integration programmes. Yet,
both Bulgarians and Roma are convinced that this money goes in the
wrong hands, such as Romany bosses and politicians. The bottom line
is that there are few if any signs that the lives of the Roma have
improved.

"Whatever the ghetto was 30 years ago, it is still exactly the same.

There is no canalisation, running water, people still scavenge
rubbish bins," said Orlin Parvanov, a company manager. While some
Bulgarians admit there are things they can do to integrate the Roma,
such as interact more with them and get to know their culture better,
the majority of those interviewed have an extremely negative attitude.

"If they were to behave differently, their problems and those of the
entire society would diminish significantly," he said.

But what most people don’t realise is that the Roma are the most
disadvantaged part of a society with many problems. While Bulgarians
embrace the idea of integration, study results show they don’t want
their children to study with Roma or to have Roma neighbours, the
hallmarks of integration.

Bulgarians themselves are not the best role model.

"We too throw our empty packs of crisps on the street. Only when
we learn not to do that will we be allowed to judge other people,"
said Kiril Pochinkov, an architect. But such self-critical thoughts
are still uncommon. The majority of Bulgarians remain pessimistic
over the success of Roma integration and don’t see much development
for at least another 30 to 40 years. But perhaps this is in fact not
such a long time, considering the complexity of integration. Minority
issues have never been easy to solve and like any bruise, the negative
consequences of the transition period in the early 90s requires a
few generations to heal.

On May 19 the BBC broadcast a report about Bulgaria on how ready,
or, rather, not ready, it was to join the EU in 2007. One of the most
memorable images to demonstrate the backwardness of the country was
a shot of a lonely Roma woman, warming her hands on a fire at what
looks like a distant Sofia suburb. Most Bulgarians are ashamed of such
images. But it is also the image which destines those Roma who are
already integrated to a constant battle with stereotypes and prejudice.

One such person is 18-year-old Hristina Georgieva. Currently studying
journalism, she says "In a few months time we will all be doing our
work placements in various media. And I am 100 per cent sure that
even though people will be nice to me, they will always have this
thought in mind ‘Yes, but she is Roma.’ and I know that this will
show in one way or another".

Georgieva has never lived in a gypsy ghetto. She has only studied
in mixed schools and doesn’t speak the Roma language. Yet, she
says, her features and skin colour forces her and her colleagues to
constantly prove themselves to others. "We are clean, well dressed,
speak Bulgarian amongst each other and have tickets for the tram. Why
are we then still looked at as criminals?" she said.

She is highly sceptical of the entire concept of Roma integration.

Bulgarians argue that if Roma were educated, had decent jobs,
lived out of ghettos and obeyed the rules that everybody else obeys,
there would be no reason for Roma to be isolated and a lot of their
problems would be solved. However, it seems that those requirements
are by far not enough to make the integrated Roma feel integrated.

Genoveva Sotirova, a Roma who holds law degree, said: "I want to be
considered for a job because of my skills and qualifications, not
the colour of my skin or my face features. I want to be let in dance
clubs and not being told that ‘tonight it is a private party’ when
it clearly isn’t. I want to be on a bus where people are not holding
tight their bags as soon as a person with gypsy features gets on".

To integrated young Roma, being integrated does not mean being
accepted. Daniel Asparuhov argued that "Despite Roma being part of
Bulgarian history for centuries, people are still not used to them
and refuse to accept them". Nonetheless, the interviewed Roma, who
identify themselves as integrated, acknowledged that most of the
stereotypes surrounding their ethnicity are indeed justified.

During the interview, they agreed that the majority of Roma are
uneducated, steal, beg and cause social problems. They called them
"the degraded part of Bulgarian society". But what angers them,
said Georgieva, is that the exceptions are not accepted. The typical
prejudiced Bulgarian mind makes it extremely difficult for us to
prove that we are not all the same, she added.

Quality education, good jobs, and being part of a society are equally
as big priorities for some Roma as for Bulgarians, Turks and Jews.

Antonina Zhelyazkova from the Centre for Study of Minorities said it
must be acknowledged that in the past few years at least some good
things happened for the Roma. "With the help of sponsorship programmes,
a Roma elite of up to 5000 people managed to be formed. A number of
young people were given scholarships which allowed them to leave the
ghetto or the small village they lived in, gain good education and
make something of themselves," Zhelyazkova said.

Five thousand out of approximately 800 000 Roma may seem a small
fraction. But it is progress. The point is that such young and
ambitious Roma exist and yet still only the poor, uneducated, begging
ones appear in news stories. Moreover, there are hardly any known
Roma politicians, journalists, actors, doctors, teachers, or sports
personas. This lack of popular, integrated Roma figures for the public
is a big problem.

Desislava Rumenova, a teacher in a mixed school, said "If they don’t
show us or talk about us, if they are prejudiced in offering us
high-rank jobs, what model can we be for the rest of Roma?"

Her class colleague, Sotirova, adds that when she goes back to her
village, Roma people there ask her, "You graduated from university
and are still without a job. What is the point then of sending our
children to school? Not only will they suffer discrimination but they
won’t be able to get a job afterwards."

But Genoveva’s response is always that such attitude leads to a dead
end. "So, I am a gypsy. Does that mean I should not develop myself
and stop living? Exactly the opposite!"

Unlike the Bulgarians who were interviewed, the Roma seemed much more
self-critical and willing to admit defects within their community.

Nonetheless, they blame mostly Bulgarians for the way they are
treated. The Roma who were interviewed said their efforts to break
stereotypes are constantly undermined. Their everyday experiences
have made them extremely pessimistic and sceptical of the concept
of integration and believe that until Bulgarians start seeing beyond
stereotypes, integration will not be achieved.

Even the Government, the students said, doesn’t give a positive
example by not appointing Roma for state administrative positions.

Having two deputy ministers in the current Government is definitely
a step forward. But considering the fact that the Turkish minority
have their own party which is also in the ruling coalition, there is
much more to be asked for.

Take, for example, the National Council for Ethnic and Demographic
issues. Out of about 20 employees in its directorate, there is only
one Roma worker. At an interview in June this year, Maya Cholakova,
the recently hired director there, justified the lack of Roma employees
by saying it is "anti-constitutional and discriminatory to consider
people’s ethnic background for a job." But some NGOs ask if is it
really not better to have Roma working on Roma-related issues?

After all, they best know the problems and needs of their communities,
said Iskra Stoikova from the Romani Baht Foundation.

Indeed, in certain situations, employing people with a Romany
background as well as from other ethnicities should be regarded
as positive discrimination. This is of extreme importance when
talking about ethnic minority integration, as the case with the Roma
currently is. As a result, the absence of Roma from the management
of the country is one of many criticisms that Roma people, NGOs and
human rights activists address to the Government. The Roma students
criticised the Frame Programme for Roma Integration – the Government’s
official policy – saying that it is simply a piece of paper which no
one takes seriously. Also not working, they say, is the Commission
for Prevention of Discrimination.

Scepticism is not only an occurrence among Bulgarians but is also
spread among the integrated Roma. It must be realised that the absence
of such intelligent and educated Roma from all public spheres has a
much more profound effect on the integration process.

The status of the Roma ethnic group will not change until they start
seeing members of their communities succeed. Currently, the majority
of young Roma don’t have someone to look up to. They learn from
the limited life experience of their parents, and thus live in the
vicious cycle of illiteracy and low morals. Should this cycle change,
it won’t be long until those Roma who need integration begin changing
their minds about education, ambition, and determination. It is, in
fact, strange that so many governments to date have not come around
to comprehending this very simple formula to a successful integration.

Bulgarians will undeniably also benefit from more Roma in the
public space. They are more likely to become less prejudiced and more
open-minded if they see a teacher from Roma ethnicity being interviewed
on television, or a Roma pop star in the charts. The study showed that
Bulgarians’ keenness on Roma integration is mainly in words. Despite
the fact that to an extent we can’t blame them for their negative
attitude and pessimism, they are far from understanding the true
meaning of integration. Thus, at least for now, it remains just a
vague concept which the majority of society is not prepared to grasp.

BAKU: Semneby: Parties couldn’t seize chance in 2006 for NK Peace

Azeri Press Agency
Dec 16 2006

Peter Semneby: Parties couldn’t seize chance in 2006 for Nagorno
Karabakh conflict solution

[ 16 Dec. 2006 17:16 ]

`There has been a great opportunity for the settlement of Nagorno
Karabakh conflict. Unfortunately, the parties couldn’t seize this
chance to reach agreement,’ said Peter Semneby, EU Special
Representative for the South Caucasus, APA reports.

Expressing support for the efforts of the OSCE MG in the settlement
of the conflict, Peter Semneby said that he hopes the negotiations
will yield good results.
Touching on the `referendum’ held in Nagorno Karabakh, he said they
don’t recognize the results of that `referendum’ and the EU expressed
its position in its statement.
He said that cooperation between Azerbaijan and EU will further
develop after implementation of the EU/Azerbaijan Action Plan.
Besides, the EU will carry out a project on civil society and freedom
of speech in Azerbaijan next year. /APA/

Results of "Singing Armenia" 2nd Children’s Competition TBA 12/17

RESULTS OF "SINGING ARMENIA" 2nd CHILDREN’S COMPETITION TO BE SUMMED
UP ON DECEMBER 17

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 15, NOYAN TAPAN. Results of the "Singing Armenia"
2nd children’s competition of choir and vocal art will be summed up on
December 17 at the Aram Khachaturian concert hall. As Davit Ghazarian,
the Chairman of the Music Society of Armenia stated at the December 15
press conference, the competition started on December 15 was organized
on the initiative of the RA Ministry of Culture and Youth Issues, the
Music Society of Armenia and the "Small Singers of Armenia"
association of the Yerevan Mayor’s Office. In D.Ghazarian’s words,
choirs of secondary and music schools, children’s creative centers
from Yerevan and the marzes took part in the competition. In his
words, from the 85 choirs presented a claim for the participation, 32
ones entered the second stage, 13 ones were recognized the winner.

Fraught At The Frontiers: Why Europe Is Losing Faith In Its Most Suc

FRAUGHT AT THE FRONTIERS: WHY EUROPE IS LOSING FAITH IN ITS MOST SUCCESSFUL POLICY
By Daniel Dombey And George Parker

Financial Times (London, England)
December 13, 2006 Wednesday
London Edition 1

Fraught at the frontiers: why Europe is losing faith in its most
successful policy EU ENLARGEMENT: European Union leaders are under
pressure to address popular anxieties about expansion but any move
to apply the brakes could be disastrous for those waiting to join,
write George Parker and Daniel Dombey

Jean Monnet, one of the European Union’s 1950s founding fathers,
foretold that in a globalised era, size would count. "Our countries
have become too small for the world . . . measured against America
and Russia today and China and India tomorrow," he once said.

Europe’s leaders have since sought to expand the EU in line with this
vision. But enlargement, often cited as the club’s most successful
policy, has become a political liability. Tomorrow, at a summit in
Brussels, the EU’s member governments will clash over how much further
– and how quickly – the Union can extend to the east.

The debate will raise questions about what it means to be European
and whether the EU can carry on growing without grinding to a halt
or further alienating its citizens. The outcome and tone of the talks
will have hard-edged consequences: is it going to become even tougher
for candidates to join the club?

Senior EU officials say this is a dangerous moment. If the bloc sends
out negative signals to future members, what consequences could it
have for reformers in Turkey, the politically unstable Balkans or
former Soviet republics such as Belarus or Ukraine? The world has a
stake in the message that comes out of Brussels.

The end-of-year summit gives European leaders a chance to take stock
of the club’s "big bang" expansion of May 2004, which saw it expand
from 15 to 25 members. By the time Bulgaria and Romania join on New
Year’s day, the EU will have taken in 10 former communist countries and
increased its population to 490m, almost half as big again as the US.

So what went wrong with the latest enlargement? The simple answer is:
not very much. While some western European countries, including Britain
and Ireland, experienced unexpectedly high levels of immigration from
Poland and other new member states, economic studies say the migrants
filled skills shortages.

Indeed, the creation of a mobile pool of labour – giving Europe’s
economy some of the flexibility taken for granted in the US – seems
to have played a role in pushing EU economic growth above 2.5 per
cent, outstripping America. Unemployment across the bloc has at last
started falling.

While there has been political instability in central Europe and
Poland has proved an awkward partner, 10 dynamic new member states
are being integrated. Europe is using its "soft power" to spread
democratic and economic transformation and stability. Even France,
the most vocal advocate of slowing the pace of enlargement, has in
an official paper called this ambitious reunification of east and
west Europe a "remarkable success".

Yet this week’s summit takes place against a backdrop of public
anxiety, typified by fears that western companies will relocate jobs
and production to the east and that cheap eastern workers will take
jobs in the west. A Eurobarometer poll this year found that only 45
per cent of EU citizens want to see other countries join, a proportion
that falls to less than one in three in France, Germany, Luxembourg
and Austria.

Concerns about the pace of enlargement were cited by both French and
Dutch voters as reasons for their rejection of the EU’s proposed
constitutional treaty in 2005. Sergey Stanishev, Bulgaria’s prime
minister, admits the atmosphere has soured. He says: "Enlargement is
a great success story for Europe but has been very badly communicated."

To allay public concerns, some European politicians want the EU to
agree its final political borders now, arguing that the club risks
getting so big it will no longer be able to act. "A Europe without
borders will become a subset of the United Nations," Nicolas Sarkozy,
the French centre-right presidential candidate, has said. Wolfgang
Schussel, Austria’s chancellor, argues that former Soviet-bloc
countries such as Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia and Armenia should be
told now to forget about full membership and develop other forms of
partnerships with Europe instead.

Most advocates of a "final borders" strategy also share the view of
Mr Sarkozy and Mr Schussel that the line should be drawn west of the
Bosphorus, excluding 80m largely Muslim Turks, whose European destiny
will dominate summit headlines. "We have to say emphatically who is
a European and who is not," Mr Sarkozy has said.

Mr Sarkozy’s proposal would have legal teeth because of an existing EU
treaty declaration that says: "Any European state . . . may apply to
become a member of the Union." If it meets the club’s political and
economic rules and its human rights standards, it should be able to
join, although it needs unanimous support from existing member states:
each has a veto. Defining what is a "European" country is therefore
both vital and elusive. Only once has the EU denied membership to
an applicant country on such grounds, when in 1993 Morocco was told
that it "was not a European country", in spite of its historic and
cultural links.

Europe’s eastern boundaries are notoriously imprecise. Geographically
the continent’s boundary is usually put at the Urals – a huge post
was once erected on the main trail across the mountains to mark
the boundary with Asia, a poignant sight for prisoners en route to
Siberia. Turkey’s prospects for EU membership have been acknowledged
since 1963, in spite of the vast majority of its land mass being in
Asia. Cyprus was admitted in 2004, in spite of its being only 150
miles from Syria and 500 miles from the European continent.

Olli Rehn, the EU’s enlargement commissioner, argues that the term
"European" combines geographical, historical and cultural elements.

"This cannot be condensed into a simple timeless formula – it is
subject to review by each succeeding generation," he said in a recent
policy paper. But even supporters of fixing Europe’s final borders
admit that this will not be possible this week. Instead they are
looking for other tools to "master" – or slow – the accession process.

European diplomats say the summiteers will agree on at least one
key point: the EU should honour its commitments to Turkey and
Croatia, which have started membership talks, and to the countries
of the western Balkans, whose membership aspirations are officially
recognised. But one ambassador admits the club is "split down the
middle" over the pace at which membership talks with Turkey and the
Balkan states should proceed, or indeed whether they will ever end
in success.

France, the Netherlands and Austria are among those who want to define
the EU’s "absorption capacity", including whether an expanded Union
can deliver the deeper integration envisaged by Monnet. It would
also look at the impact of enlargement on the Union’s budget and
its institutions.

Mr Rehn prefers to talk of "integration capacity", a phrase that he
argues applies equally to the candidate country and the Union itself.

But he insists it should not become a new "condition" for entry, a
view supported by pro-enlargement countries such as Britain, Spain,
Italy, Sweden and Poland.

This is likely to be the subject of skirmishes at the Brussels
summit. Paris wants the European Commission, as the executive arm, to
conduct fuller impact assessments and to take more account of political
developments and public opinion during the entry negotiations. "What
they are trying to do is build up an armoury of tools to stop any
enlargement they don’t like," says one senior EU official. France also
has a "nuclear weapon" to halt future expansions: each new member
after Croatia will be able to join only if French voters say Yes in
a referendum.

But France is not alone in wanting to increase political control
over enlargement. The Netherlands has been particularly vocal,
while Austria and other neighbours in what is dubbed in Brussels the
"Habsburg bloc" have concerns over Turkish accession. "The pace of
enlargement depends on the absorption capacity of the Union and not
only on the preparations of the candidate country," says one French
official. In Paris they talk of putting a "pilot" in the cockpit,
to reassure people that someone is in control of enlargement.

That position is seen as "ironic" in Brussels, where officials argue
it was French President Jacques Chirac himself who put the process
on autopilot when he insisted that Bulgaria and Romania should be
guaranteed entry by 2008 at the latest, regardless of whether they
were ready, so that the two, both linguistic affiliates, could inject
a dose of Francophonie into the latest expansion.

Dutch officials meanwhile say that although Europe has a strategic
interest in extending membership into unstable regions, that has to be
balanced against the risk of enlargement creating instability inside
the Union. That could take the form of a breakdown in integration or
the rise of xenophobic political parties in the west.

There is also wide support for the idea that future expansion can
take place only after the EU has updated its institutions – a task
that involves reviving parts of the stalled constitutional treaty. A
painful review of the club’s budget, including the farm subsidy regime,
is also seen as essential.

The problem for potential EU members is that these all appear to be
hurdles over which they have no control. The message seems to be:
you can meet all the criteria but, if the EU has not sorted out its
budget, or its constitution, or if public opinion is hostile, then
you cannot come in. "Of course, that is the conclusion some member
states will take from the summit," says one EU diplomat. "Others
will argue that all of this is blah, blah, blah and there are no new
conditions. The truth is probably somewhere in between."

Whatever the final summit text, equally important will be the political
signal sent to the countries in Europe’s waiting room. It is unlikely
to be positive. Turkey’s refusal to open its ports to shipping from
Cyprus, a 2004 entrant, will result in its membership talks being
partially suspended.

Although Mr Rehn points out that some parts of the negotiations can
continue, there will be some at the summit who believe or hope these
will never be concluded. Mr Rehn fears the negative mood, whether
expressed in the legalese of a summit communique or by the likes of
Mr Chirac in closing press conferences, will also send a message to
others – including the 25m people of the western Balkans – thattheir
path towards the Union isuncertain.

With Kosovo’s future status due to be determined next year, Mr Rehn
argues Europeans have a "major responsibility" for providing stability
in the region – including keeping open the possibility of membership
for countries such as Serbia and Bosnia.

Matti Vanhanen, the Finnish prime minister and summit host, as
his country holds the EU’s rotating presidency, had also hoped to
insert a line into the communique hinting that the door was still
ajar for other future members, but he was rebuffed by a number of
member states. But does this mean that Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova,
Georgia and Armenia – and possibly Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan – will
be denied their claim to be "European" for ever? AsMr Rehn notes,
different generations have different perspectives.

Napoleon Bonaparte, whose imperial ambitions stretched well beyond
the eastern limits of today’s EU, also took a wider view. Brooding in
exile on St Helena, he wrote: "I wished to found a European system,
a European code of laws, a European judiciary. There would be but
one people in Europe."