Zharangutiun Party’s Central Office Reopened

ZHARANGUTIUN PARTY’S CENTRAL OFFICE REOPENED

YEREVAN, MAY 29, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. “In our days RA
citizen should protect his rights. If there is no realization of one’s
rights, we will have neither power, nor opposition or statehood,”
Raffi Hovhannisian, Chairman of the Zharangutiun (Heritage) party,
declared on May 29 when the party’s central office was reopened. The
Zharangutiun party’s central office, according to Raffi Hovhannisian,
was illegally closed on March 4: first they broke the office door
bursting into the office, then changed the lock and sealed it.
R.Hovhannisian said that on April 11 they applied to the court with a
claim to open the office which was sustained on April 14. But the
opening of the office had been delayed by now for some reasons.

According to R.Hovhannisian, this reflects the campaign “conducted by
the current power towards its own citizens.” “One cannot achieve its
purpose by horrifying, intimidating, threatening, misleading the
society, closing offices,” the Zharangutiun party Chairman declared.

It was also mentioned that as a result of specialists’ check-ups it
will be found out, whether the property and documents belonging to the
party were damaged or not. The Armenian Center for National and
International Studies headed by former RA Foreign Minister,
Zharangutiun party Chairman Raffi Hovhannisian has been renting an
area in the building of Hakob Paronian theater for already 12
years. According to the agreement signed between the Center and
theater management, they have the right to occupy the area until June.
Theater Director Karo Shahbazian unexpectedly declared that they
should immediately leave the rented area as henceforth it belongs not
to the theater but to the Ministry of State Property. This was
followed by the closure of the party’s office, at that, the theater
management affirms that the office door was broken by their
representaties and the party representatives consider this a political
order.

The rise of Christian Nationalism

Chicago Sun Times
May 21, 2006 Sunday
Final Edition

The rise of Christian Nationalism: Across the United States,
religious activists aim to establish an American theocracy. A new
book offers an inside look at this growing right-wing movement.

by Michelle Goldberg, Salon

A teenage modern dance troupe dressed all in black took their places
on the stage of the First Baptist Church of Pleasant Grove, a suburb
of Birmingham, Ala. Two dancers, donning black overcoats, crossed
their arms menacingly. As a Christian pop ballad swelled on the
speakers, a boy wearing judicial robes walked out. Holding a Ten
Commandments tablet made of cardboard, he was playing former Alabama
Supreme Court justice Roy Moore. The trench-coated thugs approached
him, miming a violent rebuke and forcing him to the other end of the
stage, sans Commandments.

There, a cluster of dancers impersonating liberal activists waved
signs with slogans like “No Moore!” and “No God in Court.” The boy
Moore danced a harangue, first lurching toward his tormentors and
then cringing back in outrage before breaking through their line to
lunge for his monument. But the dancers in trench coats — agents of
atheism — got hold of it first and took it away, leaving him abject
on the floor. As the song’s uplifting chorus played — “After you’ve
done all you can, you just stand” — a dancer in a white robe,
playing either an angel or God himself, came forward and helped the
Moore character to his feet.

‘A CHRISTIAN NATION’

The performance ended to enthusiastic applause from a crowd that
included many Alabama judges and politicians, as well as Roy Moore
himself, a gaunt man with a courtly manner and the wrath of Leviticus
in his eyes. Moore has become a hero to those determined to remake
the United States into an explicitly Christian nation. That
reconstructionist dream lies at the red-hot center of our current
culture wars, investing the symbolic fight over the Ten Commandments
— a fight whose outcome seems irrelevant to most peoples’ lives —
with an apocalyptic urgency.

On November 13, 2003, Moore was removed from his position as chief
justice of the Alabama Supreme Court after he defied a judge’s order
to remove the 2.6-ton Ten Commandments monument he installed in the
Montgomery judicial building. On the coasts, he seemed a ridiculous
figure, the latest in a line of grotesque Southern anachronisms.
After all, Moore is a man who, in a 2002 court decision, awarding
custody of three children to their allegedly abusive father over
their lesbian mother, called homosexuality “abhorrent, immoral,
detestable, a crime against nature, and a violation of the laws of
nature and of nature’s God upon which this Nation and our laws are
predicated,” and argued, “The State carries the power of the sword,
that is, the power to prohibit conduct with physical penalties, such
as confinement and even execution. It must use that power to prevent
the subversion of children toward this lifestyle.”

To the growing Christian nationalist movement, though, Roy Moore is a
martyr, cut down by secular tyranny for daring to assert God’s truth.

Moore installed his massive Ten Commandments monument on Aug. 1,
2001, and from the beginning, he and his allies used it to stir up
the Christian nationalist faithful. He gave videographers from Coral
Ridge Ministries exclusive access to the courthouse on the night the
monument was mounted, and on October 14, televangelist D. James
Kennedy started hawking a $19 video about Moore’s brave, covert
installation on his show.

As the controversy over the statue ignited, Moore’s fame grew. At
rallies across the country, he summoned the faithful to an ideal that
sounded very much like theocracy. “For 40 years we have wandered like
the children of Israel,” he told supporters in Tennessee. “It’s time
for Christians to take a stand. This is not a nation established on
the principles of Buddha or Hinduism. Our faith is not Islam. What we
follow is not the Quran but the Bible. This is a Christian nation.”

By the time he was removed as chief justice, Moore had sparked a
movement, and his monument was an icon. In the days before officials
came to cart the Commandments away, hundreds flocked to Montgomery to
rally on the courtroom steps. Some slept there and imagined
themselves the nucleus of a new civil rights movement.

Thomas Bowman, a bearded Christian folk singer from Kentucky, wrote
an anthem called “Montgomery Fire” celebrating the demonstrations:
“We had love in our hearts that no man could ever remove/but with the
whole world we watched as they hauled the Commandments away.” When I
met Bowman a year later at First Baptist, he referred to the
protesters, romantically, as the “ragamuffin warriors” fighting for
God against the atheist state.

“The opposing side, the anti-God side, the do-whatever-you-want side,
the judicial side, just kept pushing and pushing and pushing for the
last 40 years,” Bowman said. And finally, he said, God called on
Christians to defend themselves.

After the Commandments were removed, a group of retired military men
from Texas who called themselves American Veterans in Domestic
Defense spent months taking the monument — now affectionately called
“Roy’s Rock” — on tour all over the country, holding more than 150
viewings and rallies in churches, at state capitols, even in Wal-Mart
parking lots. Moore also found powerful supporters in statehouses and
in Congress who proposed laws to radically restrict the power of
federal courts to enforce the separation of church and state. In
solidarity, another Alabama judge, Ashley McKathan, had the Ten
Commandments embroidered onto his robe. Christian home-school
catalogs offered copies of a video titled “Roy Moore’s Message to
America.” When Moore suggested he might run for Alabama governor,
state polls showed him with a double-digit lead.

PARALLELS WITH NAZIS

A few days before Bush’s second inauguration, the New York Times
carried a story headlined “Warning from a Student of Democracy’s
Collapse,” about Fritz Stern, a refugee from Nazi Germany, professor
emeritus of history at Columbia and scholar of fascism. It quoted a
speech he had given in Germany that drew parallels between Nazism and
the American religious right. “Some people recognized the moral
perils of mixing religion and politics,” he was quoted saying of
prewar Germany, “but many more were seduced by it. It was the
pseudo-religious transfiguration of politics that largely ensured
[Hitler’s] success, notably in Protestant areas.”

It’s not surprising that Stern is alarmed. Reading his 45-year-old
book, The Politics of Cultural Despair: A Study in the Rise of the
Germanic Ideology, I shivered at its contemporary resonance. “The
ideologists of the conservative revolution superimposed a vision of
national redemption upon their dissatisfaction with liberal culture
and with the loss of authoritative faith,” he wrote. “They posed as
the true champions of nationalism, and berated the socialists for
their internationalism, and the liberals for their pacifism and their
indifference to national greatness.”

Fascism isn’t imminent in America. But its language and aesthetics
are distressingly common among Christian nationalists. History
professor Roger Griffin described the “mobilizing vision” of fascist
movements as “the national community rising Phoenix-like after a
period of encroaching decadence.” Moore’s Ten Commandments has become
a potent symbol of this dreamed-for resurrection on the American
right.

True, our homegrown quasi-fascists often appear so absurd as to seem
harmless. Take, for example, American Veterans in Domestic Defense,
the organization that took the Ten Commandments on tour. The group
says it exists to “neutralize the destructiveness” of America’s
“domestic enemies,” which include “biased liberal, socialist news
media,” “the ACLU,” and “the conspiracy of an immoral film industry.”
To do this, it aims to recruit former military men. “AVIDD reminds
all American Veterans that you took an oath to defend the United
States against all enemies, ‘both foreign and domestic,’ ” its Web
site says. “In your military capacity, you were called upon to defend
the United States against foreign enemies. AVIDD now calls upon you
to continue to fulfill your oath and help us defend this nation on
the political front, against equally dangerous domestic enemies.”

According to Jim Cabaniss, the 72-year-old Korean War veteran who
founded the group, it now has 33 chapters across the country. It’s
entirely likely that some of these chapters represent one or two men,
and as of 2005, the group didn’t seem large enough to be much of a
danger to anyone.

RESENTMENT TOWARD JEWS

Still, it’s worth noting that thousands of Americans nationwide have
flocked to rallies at which military men pledge to seize the reins of
power in America on behalf of Christianity. In many places, religious
leaders and politicians lend their support to Cabaniss’ cause. And at
least some of the people at these rallies speak with seething
resentment about the tyranny of Jews over America’s Christian
majority.

“People who call themselves Jews represent maybe 2 or 3 percent of
our people,” Cabaniss told me after a January 2005 rally in Austin.
“Christians represent a huge percent, and we don’t believe that a
small percentage should destroy the values of the larger percentage.”

I asked Cabaniss, a thin, white-haired man who wore a suit with a
red, white and blue tie and a U.S. Army baseball cap, whether he was
saying that American Jews have too much power. “It appears that way,”
he replied. “They’re a driving force behind trying to take everything
to do with Christianity out of our system. That’s the part that makes
us very upset.”

We were standing outside the Texas Capitol building on a sunny
Saturday morning. A few hundred people from across the state had
turned out for the rally, which began at 10 a.m. Three or four men in
military uniforms sat with their wives on chairs at the top of the
Capitol steps. Four other men supported tall, coffin-shaped signs
labeled with the names of objectionable Supreme Court rulings.

The crowd was full of teenagers who had come on church buses and
families with young children. A white-bearded man in a leather biker
vest dragged a ten-foot-tall cedar crucifix painted red, white, and
blue. One woman wore a T-shirt with a photograph of Moore’s monument.
Another held a handwritten sign reading: “Ban Judges Not God/God
Rules.”

‘STAND UP, SPEAK UP’

Rick Scarborough, one of the headline speakers, called for a “million
Roy Moores” who will “stand up, speak up, and refuse to give up.” A
former football player at Stephen F. Austin State University,
Scarborough in recent years has positioned himself as a comer in the
Christian nationalist movement, riding church/state controversies to
ever higher prominence. In 2002, he left his post as pastor of
Pearland First Baptist Church — where he had mobilized members of
his flock in that Houston suburb to try to take over the city council
and school board — to form Vision America, a group dedicated to
organizing “patriot pastors” for political action. The same year,
Jerry Falwell christened him as one of the new leaders of the
Christian right.

Also speaking was John Eidsmoe, a retired lieutenant colonel in the
Air Force who wore full military dress. A professor at Thomas Goode
Jones School of Law, a Christian school in Montgomery, Ala., Eidsmoe
has written a number of Christian nationalist books including
Christianity and the Constitution: The Faith of Our Founding Fathers,
which argues that Calvinism inspired America’s founding document.
He’s a proponent of a Confederate doctrine called interposition,
which holds that states have the right to reject federal government
mandates they deem unconstitutional. “Implementation of the doctrine
may be peaceable, as by resolution, remonstrance or legislation, or
may proceed ultimately to nullification with forcible resistance,” he
wrote in a manifesto titled “A Call to Stand with Chief Justice Roy
Moore.”

DOMINION THEOLOGY

Roy Moore and Rick Scarborough are Baptists, D. James Kennedy is a
fundamentalist Presbyterian and John Eidsmoe is a Lutheran. All of
them, however, have been shaped by dominion theology, which asserts
that, in preparation for the second coming of Christ, godly men have
the responsibility to take over every aspect of society.

Dominion theology comes out of Christian Reconstructionism, a
fundamentalist creed that was propagated by the late Rousas John
“R.J.” Rushdoony and his son-in-law, Gary North. Born in New York
City in 1916 to Armenian immigrants who had recently fled the
genocide in Turkey, Rushdoony was educated at the University of
California at Berkeley and spent over eight years as a Presbyterian
missionary to Native Americans in Nevada. He was a prolific writer,
churning out dense tomes advocating the abolition of public schools
and social services and the replacement of civil law with biblical
law. He called for the death penalty for gay people, blasphemers and
unchaste women, among other sinners. Democracy, he wrote, is a heresy
and “the great love of the failures and cowards of life.”

‘A CHRISTIAN MANIFESTO’

Reconstructionism is a postmillennial theology, meaning its followers
believe Jesus won’t return until after Christians establish a
thousand-year reign on Earth. While other Christians wait for the
messiah, Reconstructionists want to build the kingdom themselves.
Most American evangelicals, on the other hand, are premillennialists.
They believe (with some variations) that at the time of Christ’s
return, Christians will be gathered up to heaven, missing the
tribulations endured by unbelievers. In the past, this belief led to
a certain apathy — why worry if the world is about to end and you’ll
be safe from the carnage?

Since the 1970s, though, in tandem with the rise of the religious
right, premillennialism has been politicized. A crucial figure in
this process was the seminal evangelical writer Francis Schaeffer, an
American who founded L’Abri, a Christian community in the Swiss Alps
where religious intellectuals gathered to talk and study. As early as
the 1960s, Schaeffer was reading Rushdoony and holding seminars on
his work. Schaeffer went on to write a series of highly influential
books elucidating the idea of the Christian worldview. A Christian
Manifesto, published in 1981, described modern history as a contest
between the Christian worldview and the materialist one, saying,
“These two worldviews stand as totals in complete antithesis to each
other in content and also in their natural results — including
sociological and government results, and specifically including law.”

Schaeffer was not a theocrat, but he drew on Reconstructionist ideas
of America as an originally Christian nation. In A Christian
Manifesto, he warned against wrapping Christianity in the American
flag, but added, “None of this, however, changes the fact that the
United States was founded upon a Christian consensus, nor that we
today should bring Judeo-Christian principles into play in regard to
government.”

Schaeffer was one of the first evangelical leaders to get deeply
involved in the fight against abortion, and he advocated civil
disobedience and the possible use of force to stop it. “It is time we
consciously realize that when any office commands what is contrary to
God’s Law it abrogates its authority,” he wrote.

Tim LaHaye, who is most famous for putting a Tom Clancy gloss on
premillennialist theology in the Left Behind thrillers that he
co-writes with Jerry Jenkins, was heavily influenced by Schaeffer, to
whom he dedicated his book The Battle for the Mind. That book married
Schaeffer’s theories to a conspiratorial view of history and
politics, arguing, “Most people today do not realize what humanism
really is and how it is destroying our culture, families, country —
and, one day, the entire world. Most of the evils in the world today
can be traced to humanism, which has taken over our government, the
UN, education, TV and most of the other influential things of life.

“We must remove all humanists from public office and replace them
with pro-moral political leaders,” LaHaye wrote.

As premillennialists grew to embrace the goal of dominion, they made
alliances with Reconstructionists. In 1984, Jay Grimstead, a disciple
of Francis Schaeffer, brought important pre- and post-millennialists
together to form the Coalition on Revival in order to lay a blueprint
for taking over American life. Tim LaHaye was an original member of
the coalition’s steering committee, along with Rushdoony, North,
creationist Duane Gish, D. James Kennedy and the Reverend Donald
Wildmon of the influential American Family Association.

Between 1984 and 1986, the coalition developed 17 “worldview”
documents, which elucidate the “Christian” position on most aspects
of life. Just as political Islam is often called Islamism to
differentiate the fascist political doctrine from the faith, the
ideology laid out in these papers could be called Christianism. The
documents outline a complete political program, with a “biblically
correct” position on issues such as taxes (God favors a flat rate);
public schools (generally frowned upon), and the media and the arts
(“We deny that any pornography and other blasphemy are permissible as
art or ‘free speech’ “).

In a 1988 letter to supporters, Grimstead announced the completion of
a high school curriculum “using the COR Worldview Documents as
textbooks.” Since then, there has been a proliferation of schools,
books and seminars devoted to inculcating the correct Christian
worldview in students and activists.

‘WORLD CONQUEST’

Those who don’t have a year to spare can attend one of more than a
dozen Worldview Weekend conferences held every year in churches
nationwide. Popular speakers include the revisionist Christian
nationalist historian David Barton; David Limbaugh (Rush’s born-again
brother), and evangelical former sitcom star Kirk Cameron. In 2003,
Tom DeLay was a featured speaker at a Worldview Weekend at Rick
Scarborough’s former church in Pearland, Texas. He told the crowd,
“Only Christianity offers a comprehensive worldview that covers all
areas of life and thought, every aspect of creation. Only
Christianity offers a way to live in response to the realities that
we find in this world. Only Christianity.”

Speaking to outsiders, most Christian nationalists say they’re simply
responding to anti-Christian persecution. They say that secularism is
itself a religion, one unfairly imposed on them. But Christian
nationalist ideologues don’t want equality, they want dominance. In
his book The Changing of the Guard: Biblical Principles for Political
Action, George Grant, former executive director of D. James Kennedy’s
Coral Ridge Ministries, wrote:

“Christians have an obligation, a mandate, a commission, a holy
responsibility to reclaim the land for Jesus Christ — to have
dominion in civil structures, just as in every other aspect of life
and godliness. But it is dominion we are after. Not just a voice. It
is dominion we are after. Not just influence. It is dominion we are
after. Not just equal time. It is dominion we are after. World
conquest. That’s what Christ has commissioned us to accomplish. We
must win the world with the power of the Gospel. And we must never
settle for anything less. . . . Thus, Christian politics has as its
primary intent the conquest of the land — of men, families,
institutions, bureaucracies, courts and governments for the Kingdom
of Christ.”

Michelle Goldberg is a senior writer for Salon. Her book Kingdom
Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism has just been published by
W.W. Norton.

PM received members of the governmental delegation of Moscow

RA Prime Minister received members of the governmental delegation of Moscow

ArmRadio.am
26.05.2006 12:36

Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan received today the Co-Chair of the
Cooperation Commission of Moscow and RA Governments, Prefect of the
Central Administrative Unit of Moscow Sergey Baydakov and the
delegation headed by him.

The Prime Minister expressed his approval of the results of the second
sitting of the Cooperation Commission of Moscow and RA Governments,
during which issues related to cooperation in the spheres of trade and
economy, health, culture, sports, tourism were discussed.

The Prime Minister emphasized the importance of the Year of Armenia in
Russia for reinforcement of the traditional religious-cultural ties
between the two countries.

Armenia To Be Advertised On CNN

ARMENIA TO BE ADVERTISED ON CNN

Armenpress
May 25 2006

YEREVAN, MAY 25, ARMENPRESS: From September, 2006 Armenia will be
advertised on CNN channel which is accessible to 70% of the world’s
populations. The contest of shooting trailers presenting Armenia has
already ended.

Ara Petrosian, deputy minister of trade and economic development,
told today that after the trailers are ready they will be shown on
CNN seven days a week for 30 and 60 seconds. The broadcasting of a
30-second trailer by CNN costs from 800 to 1,000 USD, which according
to the deputy minister, is quite cheap if we take into consideration
its effectiveness and that each tourist visiting Armenia spends around
1,000 USD here.

The negotiations over the price are still going on and as a country
which is being advertised for the first time Armenia may get some
privilege.

TBILISI: Georgian And Armenian Ministers Meet In Dushanbe

GEORGIAN AND ARMENIAN MINISTERS MEET IN DUSHANBE

Prime News Agency, Georgia
May 25 2006

Tbilisi. May 25 (Prime-News) – Andranik Marganian, Armenian
Prime-Minister and Giorgi Baramidze, Georgian State Minister for
Euro-Atlantic Integration met at the session of the council of CIS
leaders in Dushanbe, Tajikistan on Thursday.

Andranik Marganian and Giorgi Baramidze highlighted active bilateral
relations in different terms, Mediamax says.

The parties stressed that the fact that the Georgian-Armenian
intergovernmental commission for facilitation of economic cooperation
was presided over by the Georgian and the Armenian Prime-Ministers
was contributing to solution of a set of problems and elaboration of
modern programs in energy, transport and tourism.

The Georgian and the Armenian officials expressed their satisfaction
with the process of demarcation of the Georgian-Armenian frontier
line and said that the next session of the respective commission was
to be held in Yereven in August.

Talking about problems of population of Georgia of Armenian origin,
living in the southern Samtskhe-Javakheti region, Andranik Marganian
has once again confirmed readiness of the Armenian party to support
the government of Georgia for implementation of a package program
for rehabilitation of infrastructure in the region.

According to him, it would be reasonable to engage local industrialists
in construction works for easing of “palpable tension in the region”.

ASBAREZ Online [05-25-2006]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
05/25/2006
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ. COM

1) Rep. Markey Leads Congressional Opposition to Recall of Ambassador Evans
2) Amnesty International Criticizes Turkey for Slowing Reforms
3) International Mediators Urge for Karabagh Peace
4) Armenian Independence Day Festival to Be Held May 28

1) Rep. Markey Leads Congressional Opposition to Recall of Ambassador Evans

–Letter Signed by 60 US Representatives Sent on Eve of White House
Announcement of Ambassador’s Replacement

WASHINGTON, DCOver 60 Members of Congress, led by Representative Ed Markey
(D-MA), sent a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asking for
clarification on reports of US Ambassador to Armenian John Evans’ recall over
his forthright remarks about the Armenian genocide, reported the Armenian
National Committee of America (ANCA).
The letter was sent on the eve of a May 23rd White House announcement
nominating Richard Hoagland to serve as the new Ambassador to Armenia.
Ambassador Evans will be relieved of his duties as soon as Hoagland’s Senate
confirmation process is completed.
The Administration has recalled Ambassador Evans over his February 2005
statements at Armenian American community functions, during which he properly
characterized the Armenian genocide as ‘genocide.’ Following his statements,
Ambassador Evans was apparently forced to issue a statement clarifying that
his
references to the Armenian genocide were his personal views and did not
represent a change in US policy. He subsequently issued a correction to this
statement, replacing a reference to the genocide with the word “tragedy.”
The American Foreign Service Association, which had planned to honor
Ambassador Evans with the “Christian A. Herter Award,” recognizing creative
thinking and intellectual courage within the Foreign Service, reportedly
rescinded the award following pressure from the State Department a few days
before Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan traveled to Washington, DC
to meet with President Bush.
“Ambassador Evans has been recalled for doing nothing more than honoring the
forsaken pledge of his president,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram
Hamparian. “We want to thank Congressman Markey and his 59 colleagues for
calling for a clarification and rejecting the Armenian genocide ‘gag-rule’
imposed by the Turkish government and, sadly, enforced by our own State
Department.”
“Armenian Americans truly regret that the Administration lacks the courage to
speak honestly about its reasons for firing Ambassador Evans,” added
Hamparian. “We call upon the Senate Foreign Relations Committee–the
Congressional panel constitutionally charged with oversight of diplomatic
appointments–to hold a hearing thoroughly examining the reasons behind this
firing, the role of the Turkish Government, and the broader implications for
the future of the Foreign Service that a senior American diplomat’s career has
been ended simply for speaking the truth.”
The 60 Members of Congress expressed special concern about the destructive
precedent of recalling a US diplomat for speaking truthfully on matters of
historical record. They wrote that, “We must not allow the perception to
linger that he [Ambassador Evans] is being required to vacate his position
early for accurately labeling the cataclysmic events of 1915 as genocide.”
The
Representatives, noting President Ronald Reagan’s references to the Armenian
genocide, reminded Secretary Rice that Ambassador Evans “did nothing more than
succinctly repeat the conclusions enunciated by those before him.”
The Congressional signatories also expressed concern about the role of the
Government of Turkey in the impending removal of Ambassador Evans from his
posting. “Were the United States to allow the views or beliefs of a third
country to interfere with our diplomatic postings to the Republic of Armenia,”
wrote the House members, “it would establish a dangerous precedent and be
injurious to the long-standing relationship built on trust and friendship
between the two countries.”
“I am seriously concerned at the early departure of Ambassador Evans,” stated
Representative Markey. “I hope that this sudden action by the State Department
is not related to comments made by Ambassador Evans about the Armenian
genocide. 60 members of Congress have signed on to a letter to Secretary Rice
asking questions about whether or not Ambassador Evans was forced out of his
post. I look forward to a response from the State Department.”
On March 8, ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian expressed grave disappointment at
reports that Ambassador Evans would be penalized for speaking the truth about
the Armenian genocide. In a letter to Secretary Rice, Hachikian wrote that,
“the prospect that a US envoy’s posting–and possibly his career–has been cut
short due to his honest and accurate description of a genocide is profoundly
offensive to American values and US standing abroad–particularly in light of
President Bush’s call for moral clarity in the conduct of our international
affairs.”
Subsequently, several Members of Congress, including Congressional Armenian
Caucus Co-Chair Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA) and
Representative Grace Napolitano (D-CA) have each called on Secretary Rice
for a
clarification of the State Department’s position on this issue. The Los
Angeles Times, in a strongly worded March 22 editorial, made direct reference
to Ambassador Evans’ impending dismissal, calling on the Turkish Government
and
US State Department to end their policies of genocide denial.
Members of Congress joining Representative Markey in cosigning the letter to
Secretary Rice were: Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Charles Bass
(R-NH), Xavier Becerra (D-CA), Shelley Berkley (D-NV), Howard Berman (D-CA),
Jeb Bradley (R-NH), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Lois Capps (D-CA), Michael Capuano
(D-MA), Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO), John Conyers (D-MI), Jim Costa (D-CA), Barney
Frank (D-MA), Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Jim Gerlach (R-PA), Charlie Gonzalez
(D-TX), Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Stephanie Herseth (D-SD), Rush Holt (D-NJ),
Michael Honda (D-CA), Nancy Johnson (R-CT), Sue Kelly (R-NY), Joe Knollenberg
(R-MI), James Langevin (D-RI), Sander Levin (D-MI), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Nita
Lowey (D-NY), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Betty McCollum
(D-MN), James McGovern (D-MA), Michael McNulty (D-NY), Martin Meehan (D-MA),
Candice Miller (R-MI), Grace Napolitano (D-CA), Richard Neal (D-MA), Devin
Nunes (R-CA), John Olver (D-MA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Donald Payne (D-NJ),
Collin Peterson (D-MN), George Radanovich (R-CA), Mike Rogers (R-MI), Steven
Rothman (D-NJ), Bobby Rush (D-IL), Linda Sanchez (D-CA), Adam Schiff (D-CA),
Allyson Schwartz (D-PA), Joe Schwarz (R-MI), Mark Souder (R-IN), Ted
Strickland
(D-OH), John Tierney (D-MA), Mark Udall (D-CO), Christopher Van Hollen (D-MD),
Peter Visclosky (D-IN), Diane Watson (D-CA), Henry Waxman (D-CA), and Anthony
Weiner (D-NY).
The full text of the Congressional letter follows:

Congress of the United States
Washington, DC 20515

May 22, 2006

The Honorable Condoleezza Rice
Secretary
United States Department of State
2201 C Street, NW
Washington, DC 20520

Dear Secretary Rice:

We are writing to express our concerns regarding recent information
indicating
that U.S. Ambassador to Armenia John Evans would be departing early this
summer
from his assignment as a result of declaring in February 2005 that `the
Armenian Genocide was the first genocide of the twentieth century,’ during
public exchanges with Armenian-American communities. It is our hope that
these
announcements are inaccurate given Evans’ service to his country – in the
Foreign Service and as a well-respected ambassador – in a region of strategic
importance to the United States.
Ambassador Evans issued a `clarification’ and then a `correction’ of his
remarks. Last June, the American Foreign Service Association originally
intended to honor the Ambassador for his `constructive dissent’ and
intellectual courage and initiative with the Christian A. Herter Award as a
result of his recognition of the Armenian Genocide, but later withdrew the
distinction.
It now appears that Evans is being forced out of his post. We must not allow
the perception to linger that he is being required to vacate his position
early
for accurately labeling the cataclysmic events of 1915 as genocide.
By employing the proper term last year, the Ambassador was only building on
previous statements by our leaders in government, as well as the repeated
declarations of numerous world-renowned scholars. In 1981, President Reagan
issued a presidential proclamation that said in part: `like the genocide of
the
Armenians before it, and the genocide of the Cambodians which followed it and
like too many other persecutions of too many other people the lessons of the
Holocaust must never be forgotten . . .’ In effect, Ambassador Evans did
nothing more than succinctly repeat the conclusions enunciated by those before
him.
We have also heard that concerns raised by the Government of Turkey regarding
Ambassador Evans’ remarks may have played a role in this affair. We certainly
hope that this was not the case. Were the United States to allow the views or
beliefs of a third country to interfere with our diplomatic postings to the
Republic of Armenia, it would establish a dangerous precedent and be injurious
to the long-standing relationship built on trust and friendship between the
two
countries. In addition, Assistant Secretary of State Daniel Fried recently
stated his friendship and support for Evans.
At this critical time in U.S. history and the South Caucasus region, we
respectfully request your clarification regarding the current status of
Ambassador John Evans. It is our hope that that he will not be forced to
prematurely end his exemplary service to the United States and the Republic of
Armenia because of his reaffirmation of the U.S. record on the Armenian
Genocide.
Sincerely,

2) Amnesty International Criticizes Turkey for Slowing Reforms

LONDON (Anadolu/BIA)According to a report released by London-based Amnesty
International (AI), the pace of reforms being implemented in Turkey has slowed
down since it started negotiations to join the European Union (EU).
The report notes that, the attempt at bringing Turkey’s laws in line with
international standards has slowed, while “torture and ill-treatment continue
to be reported, [and] law enforcement officers continued to use excessive
force.”
Despite reforms of its Penal Code, Turkey still restricts basic rights and
individuals expressing peaceful opposition still face prosecution and
sanctions, reported AI.
Regarding torture and ill-treatment of detainees, the organization says that
it continued to receive reports about such practices in 2005. “Those detained
for ordinary crimes particularly at risk,” reads the report.
In the report, AI also says that security forces continue to use excessive
force during demonstrations, citing the death of four protestors during a
demonstration in November as an example. It notes that investigations into
these kinds of events was insufficient.
The report also criticizes Turkey’s restrictions on freedom of expression,
such as Article 301, which makes it a punishable crime to insult
“Turkishness,”
the state, or its institutions, and is “frequently applied arbitrarily to
target a wide range of critical opinion.”
The report also mentions the cancellation and postponement of last year’s
conference in Istanbul about the Armenian genocide as another example of
restriction on freedom of expression.
AI goes on to detail many more examples of human rights violations in Turkey.
It says that human rights mechanisms in the country do not work effectively
and
that institutions charged with safeguarding these rights do not have the
sufficient authority to investigate and report on any violations.

3) International Mediators Urge for Karabagh Peace

YEREVAN (RFE/RL/Armenpress)–International mediators urged Armenia and
Azerbaijan on Thursday to take the final step towards a resolution of the
Karabagh conflict, saying that a framework peace accord is now within their
reach.
Diplomats from France, Russia, and the United States made the appeal as they
wrapped up a joint visit to Baku and Yerevan, which produced agreement on the
next Armenian-Azeri summit on Karabagh.
A spokesman for President Robert Kocharian said that the Armenian leader and
his Azeri counterpart, Ilham Aliyev, will meet on the sidelines of a summit of
Black Sea nations which is scheduled to take place in Romania’s capital
Bucharest on June 5.
In a joint statement read out to the media after their talks with Kocharian,
US Assistant Secretary of State Daniel Fried, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister
Grigory Karasin and a top French diplomat, Pierre Morel, said that “now is the
time for the sides to reach agreement on the basic principles of a
settlement.” The three men accompanied the American, French, and Russian
diplomats co-chairing the OSCE Minsk Group on their latest trip to the
region.
The statement said that the Karabagh conflict “can be resolved in no other
way
than a peaceful one. Both countries should prepare their publics for peace and
not for war.”
“A joint mission such as this one is a special event,” Fried, Karasin, and
Morel said in their statement. “It must be taken as a sign of the seriousness
with which we approach the issue and, in particular, a belief that we are at
the point where a mutually beneficial agreement is achievable. What happens
now
will up be up to Armenia and Azerbaijan.”
The three officials described as “constructive” their meetings with Kocharian
and Aliyev, which took place on Thursday and Wednesday respectively. But they
did not divulge any details of the talks.
The representatives will now return to their capitals and brief their leaders
about the developments. The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs will then report the
results to the OSCE and international community.

4) Armenian Independence Day Festival to Be Held May 28

The Armenian Cultural Foundation and Armenian Youth Federation – Western
Region
(AYF-WR) have organized a festival celebrating Armenian Independence Day to be
held on Sunday, May 28, in the heart of Little Armenia.
This year, Hollywood Blvd. will be blocked off between Vermont and Alexandria
just for the event. A variety of vendors, diverse entertainers, live
performers, writers and organizations will be on hand from 10 AM to 6 PM to
celebrate Armenian culture.
For more information on the festival, please contact the AYF Western Region
office at (818) 507-1933 or visit <;

A ll subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2006 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.

ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.

http://www.asbarez.com/&gt
http://www.ayfwest.org/&gt
www.ayfwest.org.

NKR: Tax Allowances Foster Development Of Agriculture

TAX ALLOWANCES FOSTER DEVELOPMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Srbuhi Vanian

Azat Artsakh, Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
25 May 2006

Speaking about the tax policy on agriculture, an NKR State Tax Agency
official said it is designed to foster development of agriculture. The
policy provides for tax allowances to promote agribusiness. Producers
and processors of agricultural production, as well as traders in
chemicals, pesticides, fertilizers, seeds and seedlings are exempt
from VAT. Taxpayers of certain categories are exempt from the profit
tax and the tax on land. Families immigrating to NKR do not pay the
tax on land for five years. Agricultural and forestry engineering
organizations, research and test stations of educational institutions
are granted a 50 percent allowance for tax on land they use for
scientific tests. In answer to our question whether the taxpayers of
this sector ever lodge complaints with the tax agency we were told
that the agency has not received any letters of complaint so far.

Talks For Getting Sovereign Rating To Be Over In Summer

TALKS FOR GETTING SOVEREIGN RATING TO BE OVER IN SUMMER

Panorama.am
15:10 23/05/06

One of international rating agencies will soon finish the study of
financial indicators in Armenia necessary to specify the sovereign
rating of the country, Central Bank board member Vache Gabrielyan
told Panorama.am. “We hope to finish talks with both organizations
and will get sovereign rating soon,” he said.

The rating on sovereignty is determined by three international rating
agencies: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch
Ratings. The leadership of Armenia is negotiating with two of them.

The investment rating will enable Armenia to find its place in the
international financial map.

The Head of CB Tigran Sarkisyan told earlier that he waits for “B”
or even several “Bs.”

BAKU: Co-Chairs And Their FM Officials To Have Talks In Baku On 24 M

CO-CHAIRS AND THEIR FM OFFICIALS TO HAVE TALKS IN BAKU ON 24 MAY

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
May 23 2006

OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs Yuri Merzlyakov (Russia), Steven Mann (US)
and Bernard Fassier (France), deputy Russian Foreign Minister Grigori
Karasin, US Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs
Daniel Fried as well as French Foreign Ministry director for political
affairs Stanislas D’Labule will have talks on the settlement of the
Nagorno Garabagh conflict in the Azerbaijani capital, Baku, on 24 May.

A diplomatic source told APA that the diplomats will arrive in Baku
in the afternoon tomorrow. The objective of the talks is to agree on
the next round of the negotiating process for the settlement of the
Nagorno Garabagh conflict with Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents
Ilham Aliyev and Robert Kocharian.

The co-chairs propose organizing the meeting of the heads of state
within the summit- “Black Sea for dialogue and partnership” scheduled
for June 4-6 this year in Romanian capital, Bucharest.

Azerbaijani and Armenian Foreign Ministers Elmar Mammadyarov and
Vardan Oskanyan had talks within the 116th session of the Council of
Europe Committee of Foreign Ministers in Strasbourg on 19 May. The
Ministers expressed opinions on the co-chairs’ new proposals on the
details of the settlement of the conflict.

The co-chairs and FM officials of their countries will leave Baku
for Yerevan after that.

Centralization Of Property A Problem For The Banking System Of Armen

CENTRALIZATION OF PROPERTY A PROBLEM FOR THE BANKING SYSTEM OF ARMENIA

ArmRadio.am
23.05.2006 13:45

“Implementation of corporative governance will make the activity
of Armenian banks more transparent and effective,” declared Vache
Gabrielyan, member of the Board of Trustees of the Central Bank
of Armenia.

Speaking at the seminar titled “The corporative governance of the
Armenian banking system.” Vache Gabrielyan said there are no strict
terms of shifting to the corporative governance system. However,
starting July 1, 2006 some new norms will come into force, which
will allow to gradually implement the corporative governance
system. Mr. Gabrielyan noted that the banking system of Armenia is
adjusted to the implementation of corporative governance.

Expert of corporative governance of the International Financial
Corporation Panos Labrapolus noted that one of the problems the
Armenian banking system faces is the extreme centralization of
property. He referred to the results of the survey among 15 banks,
according to which only two of the banks have over 20 shareholders. The
survey revealed also that only two of the banks intend to place their
shares at the stock market. According to Panos Labrapolus’s assessment,
this is not a bad index at the current stage of development of the
banking system.