Fine Brandy Cannot Be Cheap

FINE BRANDY CANNOT BE CHEAP

ArmInfo
2009-12-02 15:14:00

Interviewed by Artur Yernjakyan

Interview of Executive Director of Yerevan Brandy Company Ara Grigoryan
with ArmInfo Agency

Mr. Grigoryan, please, tell about procurement of grapes by Yerevan
Brandy Company in 2009. How much grapes have your purchased and from
how many farmers? What is the average procurement price and what are
the peculiarities of procurement this year?

Some impact of the crisis on the producers was felt this year, in
view of which some hysteria and tension occurred as regards grapes
procurement. There were rumours as if the wineries would refuse from
procurement at all, however, if they procured, they would do it at very
underestimated prices. Now, having made the procurement, one should
probably escape all kinds of rumours and speak at actual: initially
we planned to procure 30,000 tons in 2009, but later increased the
target by 2,000 tons more to ease public tension and disperse the
farmers’ concern that the harvest will not be purchased.

So, we envisaged purchasing 32,000 tons from winegrowers, though we
did not reach this figure and finally stopped at 31600 tons. We were
ready to procure by 1,000 tons more in Tavush but the grapes harvest
in that region proved not as rich as we were told. We procured grapes
in the Ararat Valley (YBC Aygavan and Armavir branches) for 130 drams
per kg and in Tavush branch for 120 drams per kg. The farmers have
already been paid for their produce. However, procurement succeeded
despite difficulties.

However, according to the specialists from the Agriculture Ministry of
Armenia, the grapes were not sweet this year because of the rainy and
cold summer, moreover, part of the harvest rotted off from moisture
in the fields. Is it so?

We are working with 5200 winegrowers. These are the people with whom
we have direct long-term contracts on procurement. Such a number
of contracts allow seeing the whole picture with grapes purchase
in Armenia. Some part of the harvest was actually damaged by hail,
and some part rotted off because of the rainy weather, however,
I do not think that it made up a great percent.

May one suppose that part of the Armenian brandy is made not of grapes
but of something else?

I would not like to touch on this issue now. In general, we procure
grapes more than we need today.

Here one should not forget that purchase of grapes is also a social
programme where a psychological aspect is very important: a farmer
growing grapes must be sure that his produce is in demand. However,
it is impossible to purchase grapes in unlimited quantities. For
example, those 5200 farmers, the Company works with, increase the
areas of their vineyards every year. Some of them initially had 3
ha of vineyards, now their area makes up 20 ha. Otherwise saying,
the area of vineyards increases in general, and the whole produce is
to be purchased and placed somewhere.

You purchased more grapes even in the crisis year as compared to the
previous one (31,000 tons). So, why did you increase the procurement
volume: whether because of social responsibility? You, see, this is
a business.

Actually, it is very important for the people to be sure that there is
no risk and their produce will be purchased. All this allows defusing
public tension in the country. You see, the company has stored almost
30 million absolute liters of brandy spirit and can produce brandy
for 10 years without annual procurement. However, the point is that
brandy production requires succession of production, first of all:
replenishing the spirit reserves every year, we perform a certain
part of work, and the following generations will enjoy the fruits of
our work. We have inherited from our predecessors a rich heritage of
spirits. Therefore, procurement is of strategic importance for us.

The grapes we purchase today are a brandy delivered 3,5 years later.

According to the Armenian laws, the brandy should be 3-year-old to
be called Armenian, and after it is aged at least for three years we
blend it into brandy and leave in oak casks for another 6 months to
sleep, as we say.

The year 2009 has become crisis for the whole real sector of the
Armenian economy, and it affected the export-oriented productions in a
greater or lesser degree. The crisis also affected the Armenian brandy
being, perhaps, the most out-bound product. According to the official
statistics, the peak of decline in brandy sales in Armenia fell on the
first half year, afterwards the rates of decline started decreasing.

What is the situation at Yerevan Brandy Company?

Although the crisis affected Yerevan Brandy Company, the countrywide
decline was higher than at YBC. 36-38% sales skid was the peak for us.

The Company sales over 6 months, 2009, fell 36% and 54% – countrywide.

Comparing the situation with the data of 2008, one may note that we
fall behind by 14% in all, upon the results of 9 months, 2009, as
compared to the similar period of 2008. The pleasant fact is that the
first insignificant signs of economic recovery are felt in general,
however, the Russian market, with the lion’s share of brandy sales,
is the primary one for us. Unfortunately, the situation here is worse
than in other markets. We have already reached the envisaged volumes of
sales in the Ukraine, while in Armenia, we fall behind the plan by 7%,
and we even advance the planned figures in other countries. The sales
in duty-free shops even grew by 20%, while they stand behind by 22%
in Russia.

Is it necessary to diversify the sales and search new markets, or
you think that the crisis is just a temporary phenomenon?

Actually, the crisis is a temporary phenomenon and the situation will
normalize unambiguously, however, we have to seek new markets. The
point is that there are no markets to compare to the Russian ones by
marginality: sales volumes or growth rates. No established market of
any developed state had such high growth rates as the ones in Russia.

During the last 10 years, the Armenian brandy sales market in Russia
grew by 20-30% on average per year, and even by 40% on some segments.

Naturally, the current decline turned out to be more essential
under such high growth rates in the past. So, despite the inarguable
importance of the Russian market, the crisis proved the necessity
of market diversification. However, as you have already noticed,
the point is in replenishment of one or another market rather than
in their replacement.

You said that the sales in duty-free shops grew by 20%. What is it
conditioned by? Is it conditioned by the fact that Armenians like to
gift brandy more than drink?

The brandy sales grew not only in Yerevan duty-free shops, they grow
in all the duty-free shops. I think that such a situation is mainly
conditioned by the fact that consumers often deny themselves the
everyday life, however, when they leave for somewhere, they try to
overtake arrears. For example, they leave for rest, and if they used
to take one bottle with them, now they take two.

Yerevan Brandy Company has initiated alterations to the law on brandy
over many years, and adoption of standards has become possible mainly
due to the Company’s efforts. How far does the Armenian legislation
protect a fair producer today?

I must say that very good laws have been passed in Armenia. I cannot
say they are perfect, however they are good for a young state which
has gained its independence relatively recently. But the point is how
these laws are observed. The law clearly specifies that a product,
made by 100% of the grapes grown in the territory of Armenia, as
well as bottled in Armenia, can be called an Armenian brandy. There
is also a specific list of technical grapes which should be used for
brandy production. Now, the problem moved to another plain – a plain
of adherence to the letter of the law. You see, every bottle of a
low-grade Armenian brandy sold endangers the whole category of the
"Armenian brandy", a category, which was built by decades and which
costs expensive, believe me. I would not like to blacken the picture,
but every such bottle of brandy is fraught with loss of the whole
market. If we turn to the experience of other countries in solution
of this problem, in the Ukraine, for example, when I worked there (Ed.

from 2001 to January 2009, A. Grigoryan headed the representation
of Pernod Ricard Company in the Ukraine), nine organizations were
keeping an eye on the product quality. Basically, this problem was
disrooted during a year or a year and half.

Is this so-called brandy produced in Armenia or outside of it?

It is produced even here, in Armenia. Though both in Russia and in
Ukraine we sometimes reveal the clandestine plants which prepare a
substitute and adulteration.

Who and how deals with falsification of the Armenian brandy?

The falsifiers can be divided into two groups. The first group includes
unfair producers the products of which do not meet the law requirements
by the technology of their production. Such products are sold at a
suspiciously cheap price. The second group includes those who falsify
the well-known and widely promoted brands, for example, "Nairi",
"Prazdnichny" and others. I must say that fine brandy cannot be cheap!

Argentine and European grapes are lately imported to Armenia. Is this
phenomenon dangerous for development of winemaking and brandy-making
in the republic?

I think this is not dangerous at all. Rather, the danger is in possible
penetration of different diseases by these grapes, including the
grape-louse, and here we must be cautious.

I cannot but ask you a question which is actively discussed by our
public, that is, the prospects of opening of the Armenian-Turkish
border. How can the border opening affect the activity of the YBC?

What are the prospects of promoting the ArArAt brand in Turkey?

It is my invincible belief that there should be no closed borders in
a civilized world. I think the Armenian-Turkish border must be open
irrespective of the prospects of promotion of the Armenian brandy in
the Turkish market. As for the commercial success of ArArAt brandy
in case the Armenian-Turkish border is opened, it depends on many
factors, including the degree of our dynamism and execution of a
corresponding marketing.

By the way, do the Turks produce brandy?

I know that Turkey produces wine. At least, the Turkish wine I used
to taste, was not of the highest quality.

If the borders are opened, will it be more profitable for you to
supply your products to Europe through Turkey?

We may have great profit in the opposite direction, since we supply
brandy to Europe in small volumes. It will be very profitable to import
bottles, plugs, boxes and equipment from Europe – everything that is
used for brandy production. Moreover, this will open an alternative
way of transportation that is also very important. Let Armenia have
a choice to carry the freight through Georgia or Turkey.

A choice always bears competition.

Finally, can you tell us about your plans for the foreseeable future?

As for the plans for the foreseeable future, I can say that we have
developed a new brand-platform for promotion of the Armenian brandy
and Armenia itself. It is based on a cycle of short feature films
presenting the old Armenian legends in the modern interpretation.

The first film "Akhtamar" is ready, and it will be demonstrated soon.

Armen Jigarkhanyan plays the lead. A famous duduk (pipe) of Jivan
Gasparyan also sounds in the film. I must say that this is not
an advertising spot but a feature fifty-minute film which ArArAt
dedicates to the rich Armenian folklore. This time, it is the history
of Akhtamar, being a 10-year-old brandy from the ArArAt collection. It
is also scheduled to film other interesting Armenian legends.

(Ed. The package of "Akhtamar" brandy contains the following record:
"Akhtamar island is situated on the lake of Van where the Armenian
kings resided in the 10th century. The name of the island suggests
a legend of love of princess Tamara for a splendid young man").

OPCW Discusses Implementation Of Convention On Prohibition Of Chemic

OPCW DISCUSSES IMPLEMENTATION OF CONVENTION ON PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
02.12.2009 21:04 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ 14th OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of
Chemical Weapons) conference was launched in Hague on November 30
to last till December 4. Permanent RA representative in OPCW Samvel
Lazarian represented Armenia at the conference. Before plenary
sitting, Samvel Lazarian met OPCW Secretary General Rogelio Pfirter,
who expressed his gratitude for warm welcome and productive discussions
offered during his September 2009 visit to Armenia.

At the plenary sitting, Rogelio Pfirter presented the process of
implementation of Convention on prohibition of chemical weapons, also
emphasizing the importance of organization’s anti-terrorism activity.

Diplomats Air Their Views

DIPLOMATS AIR THEIR VIEWS

Kathimerini
Dec 2 2009
Greece

OSCE summit an opportunity for talks on FYROM name row but no
progress made

As representatives from 56 different countries converged in Athens
for talks on global security yesterday, Greek interest appeared to
be focused more on diplomatic exchanges on the sidelines of the event
than on the central proceedings.

Opening the two-day conference of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), whose rotating chairmanship Greece
currently holds, President Karolos Papoulias noted, "Dividing
lines remain; old disputes have not been solved and new threats
are appearing inside and beyond our borders." Prime Minister George
Papandreou subsequently referred to the ongoing row between Armenia
and Azerbaijan over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh as well
as problems in Georgia.

But on the sidelines of the conference, another dispute was the
focus of debate. Alternate Foreign Minister Dimitris Droutsas and
his counterpart from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
Antonio Milososki, discussed the longstanding rift between their
two countries over the Balkan country’s official name. According
to sources, the talks were cordial but unproductive with the two
sides simply "agreeing to disagree." Speaking to reporters after the
conversation with Milososki, who also spoke briefly with Papapandreou,
Droutsas said the conference "offers us the opportunity to discuss
not only issues of concern to the OSCE but our own issues too… ahead
of the European Union summit in 10 days’ time."

Debate at the OSCE conference yesterday focused on security in the
region, though other pressing issues, such as illegal immigration
and climate change, were also discussed.

A proposal made by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov for a
new security pact for the Euro-Atlantic region was coolly received
by Western diplomats, who instead proposed the reform of existing
security provisions.

The conference, which concludes today, ran smoothly following the
mobilization of thousands of police officers. French Foreign Minister
Bernard Kouchner praised Greece for making "an exceptionally efficient
and substantial effort" during its yearlong chairmanship, which is
to be assumed by Kazakhstan in January.
Content-Type: MESSAGE/RFC822; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-Description:

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Katia Peltekian <[email protected]>
Subject: Athens: Diplomats air their views

Kathimerini, Greece
Dec 2 2009

Diplomats air their views

OSCE summit an opportunity for talks on FYROM name row but no progress made

As representatives from 56 different countries converged in Athens for
talks on global security yesterday, Greek interest appeared to be
focused more on diplomatic exchanges on the sidelines of the event
than on the central proceedings.

Opening the two-day conference of the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), whose rotating chairmanship Greece
currently holds, President Karolos Papoulias noted, â??Dividing lines
remain; old disputes have not been solved and new threats are
appearing inside and beyond our borders.â?? Prime Minister George
Papandreou subsequently referred to the ongoing row between Armenia
and Azerbaijan over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh as well as
problems in Georgia.

But on the sidelines of the conference, another dispute was the focus
of debate. Alternate Foreign Minister Dimitris Droutsas and his
counterpart from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Antonio
Milososki, discussed the longstanding rift between their two countries
over the Balkan countryâ??s official name. According to sources, the
talks were cordial but unproductive with the two sides simply
â??agreeing to disagree.â?? Speaking to reporters after the conversation
with Milososki, who also spoke briefly with Papapandreou, Droutsas
said the conference â??offers us the opportunity to discuss not only
issues of concern to the OSCE but our own issues too… ahead of the
European Union summit in 10 daysâ?? time.â??

Debate at the OSCE conference yesterday focused on security in the
region, though other pressing issues, such as illegal immigration and
climate change, were also discussed.

A proposal made by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov for a new
security pact for the Euro-Atlantic region was coolly received by
Western diplomats, who instead proposed the reform of existing
security provisions.

The conference, which concludes today, ran smoothly following the
mobilization of thousands of police officers. French Foreign Minister
Bernard Kouchner praised Greece for making â??an exceptionally efficient
and substantial effortâ?? during its yearlong chairmanship, which is to
be assumed by Kazakhstan in January.

icles_politics_100002_02/12/2009_112970

http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_art

SCR And Group Of Companies GeoProMining Signed An Agreement On Strat

SCR AND GROUP OF COMPANIES GEOPROMINING SIGNED AN AGREEMENT ON STRATEGIC COOPERATION

ARKA
Dec 1, 2009

YEREVAN, December 1. /ARKA/. South-Caucasian Railway and group of
companies GeoProMining signed an agreement on strategic cooperation
and partnership on Tuesday.

The agreement includes regulation of interrelations of parties related
to organization of transport service within the group of GeoProMining
on transportation of gold mines from Sotk subsoil to Ararat processing
plant on mutually beneficial conditions.

"We emphasize the importance of service and considered the program of
our cooperation targeted at the increase of transportation volumes",
said Shevket Shaydullin, General Director of CJSC "SCR".

"On the basis of the agreement, a working group was established
which will deal with technical issues directed at the minimization
of expenses. We expect fruitful and long-term cooperation", he said.

Investments of SCR in the frames of the agreement will be 523
million rubles in 2010-2011. Roman Khudoliy, President of the Group
of Companies GeoProMining said that the signed agreement showed that
large companies can develop mutually beneficial cooperation.

"We plan to increase the volume of gold mining and depend on the
railway and transportation. Railway company is interested in assisting
the infrastructure via transportation", said Khudoliy. The agreement
consists of general principles of interrelation of parties targeted at
the quality increase of transport service and improvement of transport
expenses of organization of transportation in agreed terms.

GeoProMining and SCR conduct negotiations for the increase of
transportation volumes from Sotk subsoil to Ararat processing plant.

It is planned that SCR will create opportunities for
Sotk-Vardenis-Hrazdan-Ararat direction for transportation of 1,5-2
million tons annually.

CJSC "South Caucasian Railway" is 100% affiliate of Open JSC "Russian
Railway". CJSC "Armenian railway" was transferred under concession
management of CJSC "SCR" according to Concession Agreement signed
on February 13, 2008. The terms of concession management is for 30
years with the right of prolongation for another 10 years.

The group of companies GeoProMining is international private company
with diversified resource base of metals established in 2001. The
production includes gold in the form of alloy "dore", as well as
copper molybdenum concentrates. The group deals with mining of metals
in the territory of Russia, Armenia and Georgi.

United Against Spitting

UNITED AGAINST SPITTING
BY GILAD ATZMON

The People’s Voice
Nov 30 2009

Three days ago the Israeli Right wing paper The Jerusalem Post
published an expos of the growing tendency of Orthodox Jews in
Jerusalem to spit on their Christian neighbours. (‘Mouths Filled with
Hatred’, By Larry Derfner The JPost, Nov. 26, 2009).

Father Samuel Aghoyan, a senior Armenian Orthodox cleric in Jerusalem’s
Old City, told the JPost "that he’s been spat at by young Haredi
(God fearing religious Jews) and national Orthodox Jews ‘about 15 to
20 times’ in the past decade". Father Aghoyan added, "Every single
priest in this church has been spat on. It happens day and night."

Similarly Father Athanasius, a Texas-born Franciscan monk who heads
the Christian Information Centre in Jerusalem’s Old City, said he’s
been spat at by Orthodox Jews "about 15 times in the last six months".

Jewish spitting is not exactly breaking News. I myself have explored
the issue more than once. The Israeli professor Israel Shahak commented
on Jewish hatred towards Christianity and its symbolism, suggesting
that "dishonouring Christian religious symbols is an old religious
duty in Judaism." According to Shahak, "spitting on the cross, and
especially on the Crucifix, and spitting when a Jew passes a church,
have been obligatory from around AD 200 for pious Jews."

Interestingly enough Jewish spitting has had an impact on the European
urban landscape. The following can be read in a ‘Travel Guide for
Jewish Europe’.

"In Prague’s Charles Bridge, the visitor will observe a great crucifix
surrounded by huge gilded Hebrew letters that spell the traditional
Hebrew sanctification Kadosh Kadosh Kadosh Adonai Tzvaot, "Holy,
Holy, Holy is the Lord of Hosts." According to various commentators,
this piece, degrading to Jews, came about because in 1609 a Jew was
accused of desecrating the crucifix. The Jewish community was forced
to pay for putting up the Hebrew words in gold letters. Another
explanation is that a Jew spat at the cross and for this he was to
be put to death as a punishment. When this man begged for his life,
the king, seeking to have good relations with the Jews, said the
Jewish community had to rectify the offence…." (To read more:
Travel Guide for Jewish Europe, pg 497)

Shahak maintains that "in the past, when the danger of anti-Semitic
hostility was a real one, the pious Jews were commanded by their rabbis
either to spit so that the reason for doing so would be unknown, or
to spit onto their chests, not actually on a cross or openly before
a church."

But times are changing. In the Jewish state most Jewish inhibitions
seem to have disappeared. In Israel Jews can spit as much as they like
and on whatever they like. As we read above, in the Jewish state it
isn’t just Christian symbols that are being spat on, it is actually
the Goyim in general. Far more concerning, it isn’t even just kosher
saliva. It is actually everything they may find at their disposal:
saliva, live ammunition, bombs, missiles, WMD, white phosphorous,
you name it, they spit it.

In fact, spitting is not the problem. Spiting is just a symptom
of a deeply imbued cultural categorical dismissal of ‘otherness’
that distinguishes Israel as a criminal state. It is also this very
dismissal of ‘otherness’ that stops the Israelis and their supporters
around the world from understanding the level of resentment that is
mounting against any form of Jewish nationalism.

Hatred is a form of blindness. Jewish hatred, that is culturally,
religiously and spiritually orientated, is also a form of deafness.

This may explain the tragic consequences in which nationalist Jews
fail time after time to internalise the criticism leveled against
them: against their politics and culture. This may explain why Jews
fail to grasp what is the root cause of ‘anti semitism’. Rather than
being reflective and engaging in self-mirroring, the nationalistic
Jew would insist that the problem is always somewhere else.

As interesting as it may be, Zionism was the only modern serious
Jewish collective attempt to amend the cultural abnormalities within
Jewish culture. Early Zionism took anti Jewish criticism seriously. It
committed itself to bring about a civilized ethical person. Zionism
obviously failed completely. Yet, till the 1980’s some fading voices
of "humanist Zionism", people who wanted to see the Jews setting
themselves into a peaceful nation living amongst others, could still
be heard in occupied Palestine. It may also explain why the most
radical and effective voices against Zionism and Jewish nationalism,
are in fact people who were a product of Zionist upbringing (Shahak,
I. Shamir, Sand, Burg and a few others).

In the late 1970’s a young dissident movement led by an Israeli
Refusenik Gadi Elgazi protested against serving in the occupied
territories. "Occupation Corrupts" Elgazi said. He was sent to prison
repeatedly. Elgazi and his supporters maintained that controlling
other people would have a devastating impact on the Jewish state and
its morality. They were obviously correct. Through the years Israel
has become a criminal collective, complicit in genocide. With 94%
of its population supporting the IDF measures in Gaza, there is no
room for doubt, Israel has no room amongst nations. As if this is not
enough, the level of crime within Israel is also soaring. The rate of
homicidal crime is rapidly growing and it seems as if no one there
knows how to tackle the problem. Elgazi’s predictions proved to be
a prophecy. The occupation turned against the occupier.

Interestingly enough, it didn’t take long before Jewish cultural hatred
towards Goyim and their symbols would turn inward and mature into an
internal Jewish war where Jews do spit on each other. The tension
within Israel’s Jewish communities is rising by the day whether it
is the rapid rise of poverty or the rising social division between
Israeli Jewish communities. Seemingly, there is a growing unresolved
tension between the secular and orthodox Jews in Israel. As much
as Jews can hate the Goyim, nothing is comparable with the way and
manner in which they despise each other.

Channel 4, the brave British broadcaster that just 10 days ago exposed
the cross-party Jewish lobby operating in the UK, did it again. The
Battle for Israel’s Soul is an expos of the feud between Jewish
communities in Israel(1). Just like in the case of the occupation
that turned eventually against the Israelis, hatred towards Goyim
made the Israelis into a vengeful collective. Naturally it didn’t
take long before the Israelis would start to spit on each other.

Watch this film:

My message to the Palestinians is actually very simple. Give the
Israelis time. They do not need enemies. With the level of self
contempt they carry in themselves it is just a question of time before
they totally implode.

(1) To watch the entire film:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsUP0Mf-AcM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRQsJWDTNXA

West Has No Key To Resolution Of Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, Expert S

WEST HAS NO KEY TO RESOLUTION OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT, EXPERT SAYS

news.am
Nov 30 2009
Armenia

In the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict the West does not want to be on
either the Armenian or Azerbaijani side. They just want no wars or
bloodshed in the former Soviet Union, Alexander Rar, a European expert
in energy and the CIS, stated in his interview with 1news.az.

If peace reigns there, the West is ready to invest capital and wants
to exercise influence. But they do not have a key to help resolve the
conflict, Rar said. The expert believes that hostilities will not
resume, as the West will not support them. Azerbaijan’s statements
on this possibility are mere attempts to exert pressure on the
international community.

As regards the prospects for settling the conflict this year, Rar
said that no radical changes should be expected. The European Union
will only try to pressure Armenia and Azerbaijan into opening their
economies for western investments. According to him, the EU will
try to launch joint economic projects that would make the three
Transcaucasian states one market.

The EU is making efforts to shape positive moods in both the states
for the future generations to discuss the Nagorno-Karabakh problem
without intense emotions and reach an agreement, Rar said, without
making any forecasts of Russia’s furthers. Russia will naturally
support now Armenia now Azerbaijan. Armenia is Russia’s military ally.

It is a deterrent factor for the West in the South Caucasus.

Azerbaijan, in turn, is Russia’s major energy partner in the South
Caucasus. So Russia has to "run with the hare and hunt with the
hounds" like the EU does. The conflict is difficult to resolve as
all the sides are looking at both the conflicting parties, Rar said.

Russia Not To Support Sanctions Against Iran: Asatryan

RUSSIA NOT TO SUPPORT SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN: ASATRYAN

news.am
Nov 30 2009
Armenia

Iran’s statement on construction of 10 more nuclear facilities will
entail new sanctions against it imposed by international community,
Head of Iranian studies’ department of Yerevan State University Garnik
Asatryan told NEWS.am.

According to him, it will be of no surprise to Iran that will manage
to resist the sanctions. Astaryan reckons, that Russia’s role is of
major significance and Moscow will be unable to openly support Iran,
thus it currently supports West, stating "that expected Iran to come to
right conclusions after IAEA passed resolution." Russia’s statements
and actions might conflict each other and I do not think Russia will
back sanctions against Iran, stated Asatryan.

Iranian Government announced starting the construction of ten uranium
enrichment plants. According to Iranian media, the works on five
facilities similar to the one in Natanz will begin immediately. Tehran
plans to produce over 300 tones of nuclear fuel a year.

All our citizens are equal: Bagis

news.am, Armenia
Nov 28 2009

All our citizens are equal: Bagis

13:15 / 11/28/2009Minister for EU Affairs and Chief Negotiator Egemen
Bagis replied to one of the Turkish papers, commenting on hiring
Armenian for a key public post. Turkish Hurriyet quotes Bagis as
saying, `We will implement the project with the efforts of young, old,
rich and poor, Armenians, Jewish and Muslims. A 340-member delegation
should be formed, which is already approved by Turkish parliament. We
have conducted admission exams and 118 citizens already took a written
test. While recruiting people, we do not pay attention to their
ethnic, religious or political views. All our citizens are equal.’

As NEWS.am reported previously, Turkey finally decided to hire Turkish
citizen of Armenian origin Leo Suren Alepli for a key public post. For
the first time a decision was made to employ Armenian as an expert in
EU General Secretariat under State Minister of EU Affairs and Chief
Negotiator Egemen Bagis. Out of 115 contenders, Suren should get
through the appropriate exams. Final decision depends on National
Security Service of Turkey (MIT). After passing all stages, Suren will
hold the post in delegation of negotiations for EU membership.

Ardshininvest bank is the supporter of Hayastan All-Armenian Fund

ENP Newswire
November 27, 2009 Friday

ARDSHININVESTBANK IS THE SUPPORTER OF ‘HAYASTAN’ ALL-ARMENIAN FUND

Ardshininvestbank is donating AMD 15 million to ‘Hayastan’
All-Armenian Fund. The bank cooperates with the Fund since the
establishment and totally has donated AMD 104 million during 6-year
period.

As the Chairman of the management board Nerses Karamanukyan mentioned:
‘The cooperation with ‘Hayastan’ All-Armenian fund is both pleasant
and responsible process. It is pleasant, because the Bank has its
share in the plentiful patriotic actions. It is very responsible, as
well, because all the programs organized by the Fund, are premeditated
for the future generation. I think that the cooperation with
‘Hayastan’ All-Armenian Fund will continue to be efficient and
nationally oriented.’

[Editorial queries for this story should be sent to
[email protected] ]

Giro Manoyan: No Breakthrough Will Be Recorded In Negotiations On Na

GIRO MANOYAN: NO BREAKTHROUGH WILL BE RECORDED IN NEGOTIATIONS ON NAGORNO KARABAKH SETTLEMENT IN COMING MONTHS

ARKA
Nov 27, 2009

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 27, NOYAN TAPAN. Head of ARFD Hay Dat (Armenian
Cause) Yerevan Office Giro Manoyan is convinced that no breakthrough
will be recorded in the neogotiations on Nagorno Karabakh settlement
in the coming months. At a meeting with journalists, reminding OSCE
Co-chairs’ statement that they "have a serious work to do in the
coming several months" G. Manoyan said that those several months
should be multiplied for several times and it will come that not
several months but at least a year is meant.

G. Manoyan touching upon the Nagorno Karabakh problem on the background
of the Armenia-Turkey relations said that the negotiations with Turkey
have become a lever of pressure upon Armenia in the issue of Nagorno
Karabakh. In his words, Armenia should have stopped the negotiations
with Turkey declaring that "Turkey has changed the rules of the game
in the half of the game by presenting the Nagorno Karabakh issue as
a precondition and thus has already failed the negotiations."