BAKU: Absence From NATO Event Due To Baku’s Failure To GuaranteeSecu

ABSENCE FROM NATO EVENT DUE TO BAKU’S FAILURE TO GUARANTEE SECURITY, ARMENIAN MP

Ayots Ashkhar, Yerevan
26 Nov 04

Excerpt from Vaan Vardanyan report by Armenian newspaper Ayots Ashkhar
on 26 November headlined “The most important thing is to achieve the
goal, not the means”

The participation of two Armenian deputies in the NATO Parliamentary
Assembly seminar that will take place in Baku is becoming almost
impossible. Azerbaijan is not giving any security guarantees. The
chairman of the defence, national security and interior affairs
commission of the National Assembly, Mger Shakhgeldyan, comments on
the current situation.

(Ayots Ashkhar correspondent) How significant is the participation
of Armenian representatives in the seminar?

(Mger Shakhgeldyan) This seminar was initiated by the NATO
Parliamentary Assembly. There will be discussions on the regional
developments and it would be desirable to express the views of the
Armenian party there.

(Correspondent) Does Azerbaijan not agree to your visit?

(Shakhgeldyan) Azerbaijan gave its general consent to the holding of
the seminar, taking account of all participants. But our situation
is different, there are a number of negative precedents connected
with our servicemen’s visit to Baku.

(Passage omitted: Shakhgeldyan said the hotel in Baku where
Armenian servicemen lived was attacked, they were denied visas at
the Azerbaijani embassy in Georgia and an Armenian journalist from
Bulgaria was arrested in Baku and then deported)

(Correspondent) The chairman of the National Assembly sent a letter
to his Azerbaijani counterpart in this connection. Has he replied?

(Shakhgeldyan) Artur Bagdasaryan (National Assembly chairman) really
sent a letter in which he suggested that the Azerbaijani party provide
security guarantees. There is no reply, although we have booked two
Moscow-Baku air tickets for me and MP Aleksan Karapetyan. Incidentally,
the seminar has already started and will last for three days. So if
we do not get an answer today, there will be no point in going to
Baku as the seminar will have ended.

(Correspondent) The Azerbaijani party has disseminated information
in the Internet that Aleksan Karapetyan and you participated in
the Karabakh war and have Red Cross awards. Is this an attempt to
substantiate the refusal?

(Shakhgeldyan) I do not rule this out. Incidentally, I served in the
Soviet army and did not take part in the Karabakh war, and I have no
such award, although I would be very proud to have it. Thus, this is
not the reason. We expect an official reply.

(Passage omitted: The Karabakh conflict should be settled on the
basis of the Karabakh people’s right to self-determination)

Alleged Mercenary Leader Convicted

Alleged Mercenary Leader Convicted

Associated Press
Friday November 26, 2004 2:46 PM

MALABO, Equatorial Guinea (AP) – An alleged mercenary leader was
convicted Friday of leading a coup attempt in this oil-rich African
nation, but he avoided the death penalty when the court sentenced
him to 34 years in prison.

Prosecutors had formally asked for the death penalty against Nick du
Toit, the South African arms dealer it says led an advance team for
an internationally backed plot to overthrow the government.

Mark Thatcher, the 51-year-old son of former British Prime Minister
Margaret Thatcher, has been charged in South Africa with violating
the country’s anti-mercenary laws by allegedly helping finance the
foiled coup attempt.

Thatcher also faces charges in Equatorial Guinea and officials there
have said they will seek his extradition from South Africa.

Six South African and six Armenians also were convicted and drew
prison terms, three South Africans and three Equatorial Guinea citizens
were acquitted.

Central Asian, Armenian Leaders Congratulate Yanukovich on Victory

Central Asian, Armenian Leaders Congratulate Yanukovich on Victory

MosNews, Russia
Nov 26 2004

MosNews

The leaders of Kazakhstan, Armenia, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan have
congratulated Viktor Yanukovich on his victory in the Ukrainian
presidential elections. Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Belarus’
Alexander Lukashenko are the only other world leaders to congratulate
Yanukovich. All six states belong to the CIS, as does Ukraine itself.

However, the Supreme Court of Ukraine has forbidden the publication
of the official results of the Central Election Commission which
has hampered Yanukovich’s inauguration. At the same time, the court
agreed to consider the claim against the commission brought by the
opposition candidate for president, Viktor Yushchenko.

Kazakh leader Nursultan Nazarbayev said in his congratulation letter
that Yanukovich’s victory “is evidence of the Ukrainian people’s
choice in favor of national unity, a democratic way of development
and economic progress.”

Armenia’s Robert Kocharyan, quoted by the Ukrainian governmental press
service, expressed confidence that friendship and mutual understanding
between the two countries “will develop successfully and deepen the
welfare of our states and peoples”.

Armenia says Azerbaijan-proposed U.N. resolution on NK would killneg

Armenia says Azerbaijan-proposed U.N. resolution on Nagorno-Karabakh would kill negotiations

Associated Press Worldstream
November 23, 2004 Tuesday 1:28 PM Eastern Time

YEREVAN, Armenia — The Armenian foreign minister said Tuesday that
Azerbaijan’s push for a United Nations resolution on Nagorno-Karabakh
could kill efforts to settle the conflict through direct negotiations.

Nagorno-Karabakh, an ethnic Armenian enclave in Azerbaijan, has been
de facto independent since Armenian-backed forces won control over
the territory in 1994 following a six-year war.

Despite a cease-fire, Armenian-backed forces and Azerbaijani troops
continue to face off across a demilitarized zone, and shooting
occasionally erupts.

Azerbaijan seeks a U.N. resolution on Nagorno-Karabakh that it hopes
would reflect international recognition of Azerbaijan’s territorial
integrity.

“Azerbaijan is making a mistake by initiating the discussion of this
issue in the United Nations,” said Tuesday Armenian Foreign Minister
Vardan Oskanian.

Oskanian said if the resolution is adopted, ongoing efforts to solve
the issue through direct negotiations would be “dead”.

The United Nations’ General Assembly was to discuss the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict on Tuesday. In 1993, it passed four
resolutions demanding the withdrawal of occupation forces and the
return of refugees to Azerbaijan, but none of those has been enforced.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev voiced hope Monday that a new
resolution would help solve the conflict and accused Armenia of
hindering the adoption of the resolution and stalling negotiations.
Aliev said Azerbaijan would only be too glad to see Armenia drop out
of the talks and leave negotiations to Nagorno-Karabakh.

In a separate development, the Armenian Defense Ministry said Tuesday
that five Nagorno-Karabakh soldiers were killed and several others
injured in a road accident while traveling in a military truck. It
gave no further details on the accident that occurred on Monday.

Tbilisi: Zhvania’s and Saakashvili’s parties formally unite

The Messenger, Georgia
Nov 24 2004

Zhvania’s and Saakashvili’s parties formally unite
On anniversary, the three revolution leaders stress unity, pride in
achievements, need to do more
By Mary Makharashvili

On Monday, the day before the first anniversary of the Rose Revolution,
the two main governmental parties, Prime Minister Zurab Zhvania’s
United Democrats and President Mikheil Saakashvili’s National Movement
were formally united to form the United National Movement.

The creation of the new party was announced at a governing faction
congress held at Tbilisi’s Sports Palace. The congress, which opened
with a video film of the new national anthem made by producer Avto
Varsimashvili, was attended by over 10,000 people from all the regions
of Georgia and included 2,000 delegates.

The three leaders of the revolution, Zhvania, Saakashvili and Speaker
of Parliament Nino Burjanadze, whose smaller faction did not join the
new party, were joined on stage by Tsiuri Tsereteli, the mother of
national hero Zaza Damenia, who was killed when he threw himself on
a landmine in the Georgian-Ossetian conflict zone during the summer
so as to protect other soldiers from the blast, and Shorena Khubua,
a teacher of Georgian language from the ethnically Armenian village
of Sadakhlo.

The performance of the government in the year since the revolution,
and the continuing unity of the three leaders, were the main issues
addressed in the leaders’ speeches.

Prime Minister Zhvania denied categorically any rift between the three
leaders. “I want to say that all talks of some kind of confrontation
between the revolution leaders are absolutely groundless. Yes, there
are some arguments and misunderstanding over this or that issue that
should still be, but I can declare with full responsibility that we
are united,” he said.

The Speaker of Parliament stressed the importance of honesty and
communication within the government, saying, “Of course, there will be
critics from Parliament as well as critics directed toward Parliament,
but this is a normal, healthy process. Our strength is in the fact
that we do not avoid telling the truth or saying things that might
be unpleasant to hear.”

“But we have no right to be satisfied; we have no right to close our
eyes to even the smallest problem,” Burjanadze continued. “We need
to say everything to each other loudly and clearly so that mistakes
can be avoided.”

While Zhvania focused on the continuing unity of the leaders, and
the government’s willingness and ability to deliver on its promises,
and Burjanadze reflected on the fact that the government still had a
long way to go, President Mikheil Saakashvili added a note of bravura,
harking back to Georgia’s golden age under King David the Builder
to proclaim that under his administration the country was entering
a new golden age.

“Our model of building Georgia is based on that of King Davit
Aghmashenebeli,” he declared saying that his government would fight
without compromise to reintegrate the country’s breakaway regions of
South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

“Georgia will only finally be an independent country when the most
beautiful flag of five crosses flies over the Roki tunnel,” the
president said referring to the land border between South Ossetia
and Russia. He went on to warn the audience that they are facing a
great fight ahead.

“We want good relations with all the neighboring country but not at
the expense of the independence,” said the president.

The president also stated that education reform, strengthening the
army, and encouraging Georgians living in foreign countries to return
to their homeland remain the main priorities for him.

Saakashvili also warned participants that former allies of Eduard
Shevardnadze are trying to protect their interests and destabilize the
current administration. According to Prime News, Saakashvili stated
imprisoned “mafiosi” own millions in banks, control some parts of
the press and political groups and they are occupied with a fight
against the Georgian government.

Fighting corruption remains a priority too, Saakashvili saying that
especially in the regions corruption still exists. The government has
been “cleared [of corrupt officials], though the rats have moved the
battlefield to the regions and plan to return to power from there,”
Prime News cites the president as saying.

Parties of government unite

Saakashvili is the chairman of the newly-formed United National
Movement, while the General Secretary of the National Movement Giorgi
Arveladze will retain his post in the consolidated party.

“We formed our political unity before the revolution and this unity
is still strong,” commented Arveladze.

Giorgi Kirkitadze will be Executive Secretary, Gocha Kuprava
Organization Secretary, and Mikheil Machavariani will head the regional
department of the party.

Speaker Nino Burjanadze is not a party member, although two of her
team, Irakli Kovzhinidze and Nino Nakashidze, are among the twenty
other members of the party council. “The most important thing for me
was the unification of the Nationalists and Democrats,” she said.

Ten former National Movement members (Koba Bekauri, Giga Bokeria, Roman
Gotsiridze, Nodar Grigalashvili, Nikoloz Gvaramia, Davit Kirkitadze,
Rati Shamkurashvili, Gigi Targamadze, Giorgi Kheviashvili and
Irakli Tsipuria) and eight former united Democrats (Zurab Zhvania,
Giorgi Gegelashvili, Khatuna Gogorishvili, Gocha Kuprava, Mikheil
Machavariani, Eduard Surmanidze, Davit Tkeshelashvili and Gigi
Tsereteli) are also Council members.

Chair of the parliamentary Committee for Health, Labor and Social
Affairs Gigi Tsereteli described the overall message of the congress
as unity of the parties, pride in the administration’s achievements,
and awareness of the need to do more: “Yes, during this one year, we
have achieved a lot but there are still a lot of things to be done.
So this was the reason of our unification. We should do more things
together,” he said.

Double Dutch in Bulgaria

Sofia Echo, Bulgaria
Nov 22 2004

Double Dutch in Bulgaria

Koos Schouten

FIRST of all, I have to mention Martin Petrov who plays football for
Wolfsburg, the current leaders of the German Bundesliga.

A German TV commentator named him the “Celebration King” of German
football after he scored his fifth goal in two matches, bring his
total to eight for the season. ‘Marto’ as the Wolfs fans call him has
now officially become their most popular player. (Who’s surprised?).
Any opponent of the Bulgarian National Team better beware the man
from Vratsa will definitely appear in front of your goal and know no
hesitation.

On a different note:

“After a series by visits by Bulgarian politicians to Turkey,
organisations of Bulgarian emigrants in that country came to Bulgaria
to enquire about alternatives to the Movement for Rights and Freedoms
(MRF) for the forthcoming parliamentary elections. More than 85 per
cent of the Bulgarian emigrants to Turkey, who voted for the MRF in
previous elections, are not satisfied with what the movement has done
for them during its three-year term so far as junior coalition
partner in the ruling majority. This is one of the results in a
survey by Turkkan’s organisation. (Sega).”

This doesn’t surprise me at all, it has been proven in many countries
that minority parties representing religious and/or ethnic groups are
rarely successful. In my opinion, it makes much more sense for the
Bulgarian emigrants in Turkey, but also elsewhere in the world to
seek representation by leading parties that represents their
political views. In this new era of a United Europe, voters should
aim to develop a broader view in politics and not just worry about
their ethnicity.

For Bulgarian Turks, Muslims, Armenians and Roma to be represented by
minority parties will only push them further into the minority
corner. Parties such as the MRF only serve their leaders and can be
used only as whipping boys in coalition governments where they are
treated with respect only when their vote is needed.

Charity:

Last Saturday Night there was a charity Pub Quiz in JJ Murphy’s Irish
Pub for the benefit of the ONE LIFE Charity for Children with Cancer
and other Life shortening diseases. There were some 125 participants
in the pub and a pleasant evening was had by all. The organisers of
this event were also responsible for the bike ride a few weeks ago
from Sofia to Plovdiv. Although the charity events were well
attended, the average donation was less then 20 leva per person. I
believe that this is way too low considering that almost all were
expats.

Just to reassure you, the funds collected are all used for charity
and the accounts are audited by KPMG’s Gilbert McCall.

So, if you feel that you financially underachieved at either of these
events or even worse did not attend, please call Laura Thomas on
0888-546555 and she will send a volunteer to your office or residence
to collect your donation.

Politics:

It warmed my heart that after months of bickering the parties of the
right are finally getting their act together and will present the
Bulgarian voters with a real choice. I understand that there will be
two more meetings before Christmas and that by that time they will
once again present a United Front.

Although Mr. Gotta’ Yellow Army has brought some highly capable
people such as Milen Velchev into the lime light, they never remotely
lived up to their promises.

Senate Passes Bill Granting Armenia Permanent Normal Trade Relations

UNINFO.GOV
19 November 2004

Senate Passes Bill Granting Armenia Permanent Normal Trade Relations
Bill also includes provisions on Laos, dumping law repeal, tariff
suspensions
Washington — The Senate has passed a bill that would make normal trade
relations (NTR) — otherwise known as most-favored nation status —
permanent for Armenia
The bill would also extend NTR to Laos and repeal a 1916 law that was ruled
by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a violation of U.S. obligations.
President Bush is expected to sign the bill into law.
The 299-page bill, passed by the House of Representatives October 8,
comprises hundreds of tariff suspensions on imports of goods not produced
domestically and traded in small volumes.
A provision of the bill would grant permanent NTR for Armenia, which has had
temporary NTR, approved year-to-year by the president.
“I hope that we will be able to consider similar treatment for Azerbaijan in
the very near future,” said Senator Chuck Grassley, Republican chairman of
the Finance Committee.
During Senate debate on normal trade relations for Laos, Grassley spoke in
favor and argued that it would help alleviate poverty and bring the country
into the global marketplace. Laos is one of only four countries worldwide
and the only least-developed country to which the United States has not
granted NTR.
Senators from Wisconsin, home of about 33,000 Hmong refugees, argued against
NTR because of what they called credible reports of Laotian army atrocities
against the Hmong, a people inhabiting the mountainous regions of southern
China and adjacent areas of Vietnam, Laos and Thailand.
The Bush administration had pressed for passage of the NTR provisions and
for repeal of the 1916 antidumping law.
The WTO had ruled against the 1916 law, which was challenged by the European
Union (EU) and Japan. Under the law — never actually used from 1916 until
the 1990s — U.S. companies can sue foreign producers for triple damages for
dumping goods on the U.S. market with the intent of injuring U.S. industry.
To date no plaintiff has ever collected damages under the 1916 law although
a recent verdict against a Japanese newspaper press manufacturer remains
under appeal.
The bill would repeal the 1916 law, but would not overturn any case already
decided or pending under it. Whether Japan or the EU would accept such a
non-retroactive change is not known.
Miscellaneous tariff bills typically pass each session of Congress
routinely, but this one was held up over a succession of issues for three
years.
Some other provisions of the bill would:
— Extend the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) to allow duty-free
treatment for hand-woven and hand-knotted carpets, a provision designed
primarily to help Afghanistan and Pakistan;
— Correct a mistake in the Trade Act of 2002 that inadvertently raised
duties on certain Andean goods under the Andean Trade Preferences Act
(ATPA);
— Clarify the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), extending
retroactively to October 2000 duty-free treatment for collars and cuffs;
— Prohibit U.S. imports of archaeological, cultural and other rare items
from Iraq to prevent illegal shipment of looted antiquities;
— Amend U.S. regulatory law concerning cellar treatment for both domestic
and imported natural wine in line with a 2001 international agreement to
eliminate testing of wine for reasons other than health and safety.
Congressional sources have indicated they intended this provision to provide
leverage in negotiations with the European Union to accept U.S. wine-making
practices.
(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: )

http://usinfo.state.gov

Shattered lives

Shattered lives

Le Monde diplomatique
November 2004

Since the “war against terrorism” has been allowed to dominate the
international agenda, we would expect a rekindled interest in arms
controls and renewed efforts to prevent arms reaching those who commit
abuses. Yet the reverse has happened. European countries, and others,
claim to base their arms-export criteria on respect for human rights;
the US has a specific law, the Leahy Amendments, to ban military aid and
training for units of foreign security forces that commit human rights
abuses. Yet these principles are swept aside in the “war against terrorism”.

In June 2002 the G8 (1) allocated $20bn and agreed a global partnership
to prevent terrorists acquiring weapons of mass destruction. But it
failed to address the proliferation of conventional weapons, including
small arms, to states and armed groups that it knows will use such
weapons to terrorise civilian populations.

After 9/11 the US government massively increased military aid to many
countries. Some recipients are armed forces that have gravely violated
human rights and have been identified in the State Department’s human
rights report as having a poor record or worse. Recipients include
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Colombia, Georgia, Israel, Nepal,
Tajikistan, Turkey and Yemen.

In Azerbaijan, India, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Yugoslavia, sanctions
were lifted. In other countries, restrictions were relaxed. In the year
after 9/11 security assistance and related aid from the US to Uzbekistan
increased by $45m. In Pakistan it soared from $3.5m to $1.3bn.
Violations of human rights – torture, deaths in custody and
extra-judicial killings – by members of security and paramilitary forces
in those countries continue. In March 2002 the US administration
introduced an emergency supplemental defence authorisation bill that
sought to lift restrictions on Indonesia and Colombia.

Close US allies, such as the UK government, appeared to follow. The
value of British arms cleared for export to Indonesia rose from £2m in
2000 to over £40m in 2002 (2). The main arms exporters in Europe –
Germany, France, Italy, the UK and Sweden – accounted for 33% of
international contracts for transfers signed between 1994 and 2001 (3).
The EU’s market share was smaller than that of the US or Russia, but it
has increased since 1 May, with enlargement adding 10 new members. Some
new states are large arms producers and exporters. The EU is now home to
more than 400 companies in 23 countries manufacturing small arms and
light weapons – hardly less than the US.

The EU code of conduct adopted in 1998, and its application, leave much
to be desired. Many reports have been received of (old or new) EU member
states exporting military, security or police equipment and know-how,
often in great secrecy, to countries that use these things to violate
human rights. At the same time private military companies contracted to
carry out tasks on behalf of governments or opposition forces
increasingly play a critical part in the supply of arms and support for
regimes. PMCs are often ideally placed to import arms. They are in
contact with governments, arms dealers and manufacturers and air freight
companies. One firm supplied arms to both parties in the conflict in
Sierra Leone.

PMCs are gaining in number and influence, and many commentators think
that the war on terror will speed this up. During the 1990s the US
government often used private military consultants or authorised them to
train police forces and troops in 24 countries; it failed to ensure that
training encouraged strict compliance with international humanitarian
law and law on human rights.

Taken from Amnesty International sources, including “Shattered Lives”,
published in 2003 by Amnesty International and Oxfam. The full text is
at <;.

NOTES

(1) Germany, Canada, US, Russia, France, Italy, Japan, UK.

(2) The Guardian, London, 1 July 2003. (3) See “Conventional arms
transfers to developing nations, 1994-2001”, Congressional Research
Service, Washington, August 2002.

http://www.controlarms.org&gt
http://mondediplo.com/2004/11/12report
www.controlarms.org

Prague: Group of people smugglers sentences

Czech News Agency
November 15, 2004

GROUP OF PEOPLE SMUGGLERS SENTENCED

PRAGUE, Nov 15 (CTK) – Fourteen people of a 16-member gang of people
smugglers were today convicted by the Prague 5 District Court and
received from suspended sentences to four years in prison.

According to the prosecutor, the group, led by Chechen man Ilyas
Muzayev, illegally transported over 1,000 refugees to Austria and the
Benelux countries between August 2002 and last October.

Ten men faced charges of criminal conspiracy and illegal border
crossing, while the rest only committed the latter crime, the court
ruled.

The sentences have not yet taken effect.

The highest, four-year penalty, was meted out for Muzayev and another
foreign organiser.

They also have to pay 400,000 crowns, or else they will have to serve
one more year in prison.

Three years in prison will have to be spent by three foreign members
of the gang, who also have to pay a fine of 250,000 to 300,000
crowns.

According to the police, the group, composed of Muzayev, a number of
Armenians, a Romanian, an Egyptian and Czech drivers and taxi
drivers, was linked with similar organisations in Austria and
Germany. At first, the people smugglers organised the transit of
displaced people from India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Egypt, while in
recent months they focused on the people from the former Soviet
Union.

The police said that when the group had been shadowed, it had
smuggled at least 1,500 migrants, earning roughly one million euros.
Along with accomplices from Austria and Germany, it may have smuggled
a total of 4,000 people for 2.5 million euros.

According to the Austrian police, the gang demanded about 1,000 euros
per head for its services.

pv/dr/vv

Role of state

Role of state

Editorial

Yerkir/arm
November 12, 2004

The criteria for evaluation of modern value processes is how much an Armenian
citizen is able to realize his creative potential, how much the society
contributes to the formation of the creativity.

If proper social conditions do not contribute to the development, then the
freedom of the person are endangered, since a person cannot be free without
conditions for personal growth. On the other hand, a nation cannot reproduce
itself without a creative and conscious approach.

In the current situation, neither the society nor the state offer a strategy
for anything other than reproduction. The goal of nations is to effectively
reproduce through creative self-realization. History shows that nations ignoring
this aspect have lost the meaning in lives and have either fallen or become
dependent on others.

Although thirteen years have passed after the independence of Armenia, it is
still not late to get to the start and ask the question of what Armenia should
be for its residents on the one hand and what it should be for the Diaspora,
on the other hand. The answer to this question is the pledge for our
development.

The other question to be asked is where is our place and role in the world as
a nation and a state. Our questions are actual for defining Armenian state’s
role for human, society and nation and what is its role for the world.

Without the above mentioned we will not be able to put values into our lives
and actions as human, society and nation. The values have a crucial role in
formation and reproduction of social capital.

And the social capital has a crucial role in development of a person and
societies. Without a social capital people will have to invent bicycles
repeatedly, and the society will have to be setting up a social system.