Russia wants peaceful & soonest settlement of all post-sovietconflic

RUSSIA WANTS PEACEFUL AND SOONEST SETTLEMENT OF ALL POST-SOVIET CONFLICTS, LAVROV SAYS

ArmenPress
Feb 17 2005

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 17, ARMENPRESS: Armenian and Russian foreign
ministers Vartan Oskanian and Sergey Lavrov discussed today a wide
range of issues in Yerevan, from economic cooperation, Nagorno Karabagh
conflict and the two countries’ interaction within international
organizations.

Russia wants peaceful and soonest settlement of all conflicts on the
post-Soviet territory, Lavrov said while negotiating with his Armenian
counterpart. In a reference to the Nagorno Karabagh conflict Lavrov
expressed hope that “the Prague process” will help the two sides to
find a mutually acceptable peace formula, saying also that Russia is
ready to act as its guarantor.

“We maintain partner-like and allied economic relations and those
in the field of security, ” Lavrov said.

For his part Oskanian said: We have managed to build top-level
relations and right now our relations amount to strategic
partnership. Armenia and Russia lack any political differences. We
share common regional and global interests.”

Putin, Aliyev open Year of Azerbaijan in Russia

Putin, Aliyev open Year of Azerbaijan in Russia

ITAR-TASS, Russia
Feb 16 2005

In his speech Putin said, “Due to national identity our peoples
always show interest in and will be very important for each other.”
“The most valuable thing is that in all turns of their history Russians
and Azeris assisted to each other and remained reliable allies and
good friends.”

“In the last 10 years the positive development of relations between
Russia and Azerbaijan was conditioned by Geidar Aliyev’s authority
and wisdom. We, Russians, remember and honour his merits,” Putin said.

He recalled, “Brotherhood of our people experienced in the fight
against fascism. We’ll soon mark the 60th anniversary of VE-Day and it
is natural that we’ll celebrate it together.” The Russian president
thanked Aliyev for he accepts the invitation to visit Moscow as part
of the VE-Day celebrations.

Addressing Azerbaijan’s veterans Putin said, “We honour courage and
heroism of 600,000 Azeris who fought on the fronts of World War II
and struggled for the common victory.” A total of 42 Azeris were
given the title of Heroes of the Soviet Union. Twelve Azeris were
awarded complete sets of the Order of Glory.

On the present development of Russian-Azerbaijani relations, Putin
said political, economic and cultural cooperation is developing
dynamically. “I mean mutually beneficial cooperation, the creation of
new jobs and migration, the use of the common cultural and information
space, including in the field of education,” the president explained.

He stressed that Russia and Azerbaijan “are a significant factor
of regional stability.” Russia and Azerbaijan “are interested in
using the CIS possibilities more actively in order to solve social
and economic problems and jointly counteract the threats to national
security, terrorism and extremism.”

The Russian president said he is convinced that Russia “seeks to do
its best to settle the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and ensure reliable
stability in the region.”

Putin considers the openness of Year of Azerbaijan in Russia “an
absolutely landmark event.”

“It’s very pleasant that our meeting have become regular. Now you’ve
arrived for such pleasant reason – to open Year of Azerbaijan in
Russia,” the Russian president said.

“We attach much significance to this event. I hope that the year 2005
will facilitate the expansion of bilateral friendly relations. We’ll
become closer,” Aliyev said. He expressed the hope that Year of Russia
in Azerbaijan will be held in 2006.

–Boundary_(ID_g1phpfgLI3YwpO3Xo+bOsg)–

The Turkey Issue

THE TURKEY ISSUE

Azg/arm
15 Feb 05

French Analyst Article in Moscow Paper

One can only wonder reading articles of European political scientists
on Islam, Islamic states and their civilizations: canâ~@~Yt
these people see or donâ~@~Yt they want to see the real danger to
Christian civilization or civilization as a whole? How close does the
Muslim world stand to such noble European ideas as democracy, human
rights, womanâ~@~Ys emancipation, respecting the rights of national
minorities? When the Muslims were â~@~Xstrugglingâ~@~Y for the right
of wearing headscarves, they skillfully used the European credo of
freedom. But who will ever see a Christian demand a similar thing in,
say, Saudi Arabia or Iran.

>>From this perspective and from the viewpoint of Armenian subjective
approach, the article of Thierry de Montbrial, president of French
Institute of International Relations, entitled â~@~XThe Turkey
Issueâ~@~Y published in one of Moscow newspapers is immensely
interesting.

Montbrial thinks that the widening of the European Union makes it
versatile and variegated and considers it is dangerous. The Turkey
issue arises on this ground. Turkey entered the pilot stage of EU
accession after the Helsinki sitting in 1999. Three years later, just
before the Copenhagen summit, Justice and Prosperity Party declaring
adherence to Islam and bidding for a “party of Muslim democracy” came
to power. Meanwhile the new government continued the policy of reforms
launched by their predecessors and received the monitoring group of
the European Commission, to great surprise of numerous observers. Thus,
Turkey is doing everything to join the “Christian Club”.

The French analyst asks why they fear Turkey in Europe. Turkey for
most of the Europeans, he says, is an embodiment of deeply rooted
events that make them dread. The image of a dangerous enemy and
conqueror is palpable.

Democracy is another cause for fear; Turkeyâ~@~Ys population is about
70 million and keeps on growing. Once an EU member, it may have the
greatest majority of representatives at the European Parliament.

Thirdly, Europeans fear Islam that grew in momentum after the 9/11.

Franceâ~@~Ys open opposition to Turkey-EU relations, and the apologists
of Turkey-free Europe often refer to French politiciansâ~@~Y
statements. “Turkey stands very close to Europe and it has a real
political elite. Its importance is great but it is not considered a
European state”, Valeri Giscard d´Estaing, ex-president of France,
stated. If it becomes a member of the community that will be “the
end of the European Union”, Thierry de Montbrial wrote.

The most important part of the article for the Armenians is perhaps
the part where Montbrial speaks of the possibilities of general
reconciliation.

Itâ~@~Ys obvious, he says, that the UE is leaning on few conjoint
ideas that are united forming a system. They are: democracy, human
rights, respect for and protection of minorities, the rule of law,
reconciliation, secular government and market economy (Copenhagen
criteria).

The French analyst highlights 3 issues: relation of democracy to
minorities, secular government and reconciliation. He says that it
would be a great achievement if Turkey manages to settle all issues
concerning national minorities, the Kurdish issue first and foremost,
in accordance with the Western criteria.

Mentioning of the societyâ~@~Ys secularization, the author hesitates
that implacable adherents of Islam may come to power if Turkey fails
in effecting democratic reforms to join EU. They are possibly waiting
for their hour hoping that Turkeyâ~@~Ys candidacy will be voted down.

Concerning reconciliation, the author emphasizes latterâ~@~Ys romantic
nature no matter how desirable it is. Those concocting great plans have
the right and even have to dream. Why cannot we dream of reconciliation
of Turks and Greeks, successors of the Byzantine and Ottoman empires,
and even of representatives of 3 religions?

Though it is hard to imagine, Montbrial notes, we can also dream of
Armenian-Turkish reconciliation on the basis of European project. What
we mean by project is a system that will include realization of the
3 following conditions.

Firstly, each stage of broadening the EU has to be tested not
to destroy the system as a whole. The process of “transplantation”
has to be controlled. So, the immediate joining of such a country as
Turkey is hardly possible, it may happen in the course of time.

Secondly, the member states have to prove in practice that they
are truly following the Copenhagen criteria. Whereas it is scarcely
optimistic as regards Muslim countries.

And thirdly, no EU candidate can join the Union unless there is
unanimous consent of the member states after the accession talks. The
French analyst is pessimistic as regards the results of the future
talks.

All in all, Montbrial thinks that it would be a mistake not to start
accession talks in near future. Unless we do that, nationalistic and
Islamic forces turned against Europe will come to light throwing the
country into crises with unimaginable consequences. Besides, Montbrial
states unambiguously, the start of the talks is not equivalent to
the end.

By Ruben Hayrapetian

–Boundary_(ID_3eDjzlvNlhzjYxVgevJJ6w)–

Turkey To Target At Orhan Pamuk

TURKEY TO TARGET AT ORHAN PAMUK

Azg/arm
15 Feb 05

Turkish Papers and Scientists Declare Him Traitor of Nation

The Swiss Tagesanzeiger published the interview given by Orhan Pamuk,
Turkish novelist, in its February 6 issue. Itâ~@~Ys worth reminding
that the Turkish novelist emphasized the necessity to publicly speak
about the tragic events that took place in the past and added: “30
thousand Kurds and 1 million Armenians were killed in Turkey. Almost
no one dares speak but me, and the nationalists hate me for that.”

The statement made by Pamuk aroused indignation in Turkey and he
became the target of almost all Turkish newspapers that condemn him
of treason.

For example, Vatan newspaper touched upon the statement of Pamuk in
“Is the Freedom of Speech Is Also Freedom of Treason?” article, while
the article published in Aksham is entitled “Why Does Pamuk Hate?”

Hyurriet called Pamuk “the black writer” in the article by Fatih
Altay. The newspaper calls him a liar, emphasizing that his approach is
that of an enemy. Hyurriet called the writer “a miserable creature,”
adding that they even donâ~@~Yt want to waste their hatred on him.

The Turkish scientists join the Turkish press in making Orhan Pamuk
a target for criticism and hatred. In order to comment Pamukâ~@~Ys
statement, Gazete Vatani turned to Tokamesh Atesh, professor at the
Istanbul University, who called this statement a huge drawback for
the novelist, adding that the history shouldnâ~@~Y t be analyzed like
that. Professor Bahaddin Yediydez accused Pamuk of ignorance and said:
“There is not a single country in the world where the state authorities
do not interfere with the rebellion of a separate ethnic group.”

Professor Hikmet Ozdemir, head of the Armenian Studies Department at
the Turkish Union of Historians, threatened to refute the “unfair”
statement of Pamuk scientifically. At the same time, he emphasized that
he, as a scientist, canâ~@~Yt seriously treat Pamuk, saying that his
statement about the massacre of 1 million Armenians is a “great lie.”

Halil Inaljek, professor at the Bosphorus University, accepting the
worldwide fame of Pamuk, condemned him of making an irresponsible
statement against the Turkish state and the Turkish nation.

Perhaps, only Halil Berktay, professor at Sabanj University, supported
Pamuk describing him as a fair intelligent and pointed out that he
told the truth. Berktay added: “In 1915-16 about 800 thousand or 1
million Armenians were killed for sure. I donâ~@~Yt know how many Kurds
were killed in the Southeast of the country. But, I think it is quite
possible that the number of the killed Kurds amounted 30 thousand.”

Itâ~@~Ys worthless to comment on the response of the Turkish press
and the scientists to the statement made by Orhan Pamuk. We just want
to inform our readers about the confrontation, so that the Armenian
society can response the anti-Armenian statements of the dregs of
society that have to unfold Turkish-Azeri propaganda in Armenia. At
the same time, we want to tell the public, culture and political
figures visiting Turkey that they shouldnâ~@~Yt mix the tolerance in
issue of the difference in the opinions with joining their voices to
the Turkish denial of the Armenian Genocide.

By Hakob Chakrian

–Boundary_(ID_cKRHIYQS10BhdxajPcXSaA)–

‘Economic Viability of Our City Warrants More Vigilance’

‘Economic Viability of Our City Warrants More Vigilance’
By PRANAY GUPTE, Special to the Sun

The New York Sun
February 14, 2005 Monday

Taking lunch with Robert M. Morgenthau, the most powerful prosecutor in
America, the reporter is immediately conscious of the fact that he’s
a living legend – and has been so since he became Manhattan district
attorney 30 years ago. Other famous people in this Midtown restaurant
discreetly stare. Some come up to shake his hand. Others wave at him,
and he waves back. Still others avert their eyes.

But when a reporter asks what it feels like to be a living legend –
he’s the second-longest serving district attorney in American history
(one of his predecessors, Frank Hogan, was Manhattan DA for 32 years);
he’s had cumulatively the longest prosecutorial tenure in any country;
he’s been the scourge of international money-launderers, murderers,
and Wall Street fraudsters – Mr. Morgenthau doesn’t seem particularly
inclined to respond to the question.

It was a natural question to ask. It’s not just his record as district
attorney that’s the stuff of legends. Mr. Morgenthau was a celebrated
U.S. Attorney for the Southern District for several years before he
became district attorney, having prosecuted the socialite lawyer Roy
Cohn and also having created the country’s first securities fraud
bureau. If New York corporations are more vigilant today with regard
to their books, and if their CEOs are less inclined to raid their
treasuries, and if shareholder interests are better served, it’s
substantially because of the tough standards of vigilance and scrutiny
that Mr. Morgenthau has brought to the financial community – and to
the severe penalties he’s sought for white-collar criminals. Just last
week, for example, Arab Bank closed down its Madison Avenue branch
after the district attorney’s office found a damning trail of money
from its premises to terrorist organizations in the Middle East.

So the reporter asked again: “Well, do you ever think of yourself as
a living legend?”

“Living legend?” Mr. Morgenthau said in his dulcet voice, chuckling
ever so slightly as he carefully worked his way through a salad and
scallops at lunch, as though he was somewhat amused by the question.
“Those aren’t my words. I would never use those words.”

Of course he wouldn’t. He’s a remarkably modest man, almost painfully
reluctant to talk about his accomplishments. His work has been
validated not only by a lengthy string of convictions obtained over
five decades in public office, it has been honored by awards and
memorabilia that fill his office, spill over into his Upper East Side
home, and occupy yards of shelves and walls in the homes of some of
his seven children.

The reporter persisted. “But a lot of people look up to you as a role
model,” he ventured, also noting that many movies, and the long running
“Law and Order” franchise on television, have featured characters
clearly based on Mr. Morgenthau.

“Role model?” Mr. Morgenthau said. “Well, I leave that to others to
decide, too.”

That verdict, in fact, has long been in. He has inspired and
encouraged at least two generations of lawyers and prosecutors,
including New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who was part
of Mr. Morgenthau’s rackets bureau. Former mayor Rudolf Giuliani, who
was U.S. attorney for the Southern District, is another figure who
acknowledges the Morgenthau influence on his prosecutorial pathway.
Four other U.S. Attorneys also served under Mr. Morgenthau, as
did eight federal judges in the Southern District and 30 current
criminal-court judges. The late John F. Kennedy Jr. worked for him.
If a man’s lifework is to be assessed by how he shaped the careers and
professional sensibilities of those who served under him, then it’s
certainly no hyperbole to say that Mr. Morgenthau is a living legend.

His downtown office, at One Hogan Place, is legendary, too. With
502 lawyers, it is the one of the busiest district attorney offices
in America, handling more than 110,000 cases each year. When Mr.
Morgenthau first became district attorney – after defeating Richard
Kuh, who’d been appointed by then Governor Malcolm Wilson when Frank
Hogan died in 1974 – Manhattan was No. 1 in murders in New York’s
five boroughs. Each year, nearly 700 murders occurred in Manhattan,
or almost 40% of the city’s total. Last year, that figure was down
to 91, representing just 16% of the city’s murders annually.

Mr. Morgenthau is quick to share that success with the city’s Police
Department and to the men and women he calls “indefatigable enforcers
of the law.” He’s always liked cops, even though his office has put
some 100 corrupt ones behind bars. Cops have liked him, too, not the
least because of his intense involvement with the Police Athletic
League, which organizes educational and sports programs for more
than 70,000 minority-group youths and other boys and girls – ages
5 to 18 – from the less privileged of New York’s neighborhoods. He
became president of the PAL in 1962 and held that office until 10
years ago, when he was elevated to chairman. Rare is the PAL event
or NYPD ceremony where Mr. Morgenthau isn’t present.

Rare is the occasion, too, when he doesn’t attend the games of the
baseball league that the Manhattan district attorney’s office has put
together. Mr. Morgenthau, a spry, wiry man who could be easily taken
for a man decades younger, is especially attentive to the importance
of physical fitness: when he talks to young people about looking after
themselves, he’s alluding to his own daily regimen of an hour on the
treadmill, of lifting weights, and watching his diet.

On a different plane, rare, too, is the occasion when Mr. Morgenthau
doesn’t speak out forcefully about two social issues – among others
– that he deeply cares about: the hiring of women and minorities,
and tackling domestic violence.

‘When I became district attorney, the office had 10 minority assistant
district attorneys, and 19 women ADAs,” he said. “Now we have 110
minority-group ADAs, and 244 women ADAs.”

Indeed, half of the lawyers who work with Mr. Morgenthau are women – by
far the best percentile representation of women in any law-enforcement
agency in America. Nearly 50 lawyers attend exclusively to domestic
violence and spousal-abuse cases. Mr. Morgenthau may be a man of
extraordinary social tolerance, but he will not condone domestic
violence. “Women, and all those who find themselves vulnerable in
domestic situations, must feel that they are protected at all times,”
he said.

But how much of his hiring and the emphasis on issues such as domestic
violence and women’s rights is a result of social activism on his part,
the reporter wanted to know, how much of it flowed from a desire to
be politically correct?

“Our hiring is done by a committee of 30,” Mr. Morgenthau replied.
“We hire strictly on merit. We don’t vet people for their social
beliefs. We hire people to uphold the laws that are on the books.”

That means, above all, that he wants people to be committed to public
service. It means that he wants them to work long hours. It means
that he wants people who display humility, not arrogance. “I want my
staff members to never abuse the power and authority that come from
being a prosecutor,” Mr. Morgenthau said. “I give all ADAs heavy
responsibility early on.”

“Unlike in a law firm, where you have to slog for years before you
become a partner, in my office everyone’s a partner from the day he
or she is hired,” Mr. Morgenthau said. His own rise after World War
II from an associate to partner at Patterson, Belknap & Webb took
only six years.

Of course, that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a seniority system in the
Manhattan district attorney’s office. Nor does it mean that different
units within the office aren’t competitive with one another. Indeed,
some staff members have even been known to shout at each other over
the question of grabbing big cases. (Top prosecutors in his office
get about $90,000 a year, far less than starting associates fresh
out of law school, who many big law firms hire at $150,000 annually;
starting lawyers in the DA’s office get $48,000 a year.)

But Mr. Morgenthau’s emollient personality – and his status – doesn’t
invite anyone to shout at him. And unlike several top prosecutors
around America, he’s not one to grab major cases from his subordinates.

“I’m not one for grandstanding,” he told The New York Sun. “I don’t do
showboating. I pick good people, I give them lots of responsibility,
and I don’t take away the big cases from them.”

“I believe in mentoring,” Mr. Morgenthau added. “I believe in sharing
my experience with young people.”

That belief surely stems from the fact that he himself benefited from
wisdom and guidance of mentors early in his professional life. One
major mentor was Robert Porter Patterson, a legendary figure in legal
and government circles. “He was an absolute straight arrow,” Mr.
Morgenthau said of him. “But if he liked you, you couldn’t do
anything wrong. Because of his own tenure in government, he left
an extraordinary impression on me about the importance of public
service. It’s an impression that I always relay to the young people who
I hire. It’s important for older lawyers to take interest in developing
the careers of younger lawyers. I’ve always tried to do that.”

Mr. Morgenthau’s professional relationship with Mr. Patterson –
who also served as U.S. secretary of war, as a judge on the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals, and as the president of the Council on
Foreign Relations, and of Freedom House – was such that the older
lawyer would take Mr. Morgenthau on virtually every business trip
around the country. On January 22, 1952, Mr. Patterson went on a trip
to Buffalo, but Mr. Morgenthau begged off because he was preparing
a brief for a Supreme Court case. That evening, the plane that Mr.
Patterson had

boarded to take him back to New York, crashed in a driving snow storm
in Elizabeth, N.J. Mr. Morgenthau almost surely would have been among
the fatalities.

It wasn’t the first time that he escaped an encounter with death.
During World War II,when he was the 23-year-old executive officer
of the USS Lansdale, a Nazi torpedo sank his ship. He drifted in the
Mediterranean on a lifebelt for four hours off the shores of Algeria
before he was rescued. “I didn’t have much of a bargaining chip, but
I made a deal with the Almighty in those hours – the deal was that
if I survived my ordeal, I’d give something back to society,” Mr.
Morgenthau said. “Everything that I’ve done in life since has been
a payback.”

Some months later, he got an opportunity to renew that deal. Serving
aboard the USS Harry F. Bauer just north of Okinawa in the Pacific,
the American fleet was attacked by 1,900 Japanese kamikaze planes.
Some 700 of those planes met their targets; Mr. Morgenthau’s ship,
which was the target of seven separate attacks, was hit by a torpedo
and a 500-pound bomb, neither of which detonated. He recalled that the
day of one of the Japanese attacks, May 11, 1945, was the birthday of
his father, Henry Morgenthau Jr., President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s
secretary of war.

“I didn’t want to get killed on my father’s birthday,” he said. He
wound up shooting down 17 Japanese planes. For his bravery in action,
he and his fellow sailors were awarded the Presidential Unit Citation.

“Of all the awards that I’ve received in life, I’m proudest of this
one,” Mr. Morgenthau said, quietly. “I really am. Those aboard my
ship were incredibly brave. You learn very quickly what teamwork
is all about, how important it is in life to support the people you
work with.”

That support manifests itself in the manner in which Mr. Morgenthau
ensures that his staff is insulated from the political pressures that
inevitably come from the Establishment.

“I never tell my assistants about the political calls I get,” Mr.
Morgenthau said. “They must always feel free to do what is right
in the cases that they handle. I believe in approaching every case
without fear or favor, and my staff members share that thinking.”

When those political calls come – usually to ask for deferring or
delaying an investigation – Mr. Morgenthau’s typical response, as he
put it, is: “I ask my assistants to expedite the case. By now people
know better than to try and muscle me.”

His response to unseemly political pressures from important members
of New York’s Establishment has, in fact, resulted in a long parade of
prominent indictments and convictions, including those of state Senator
Guy Velella. A powerful Bronx Republican, Mr. Velella pleaded guilty
to a felony – which involved influencing state agencies – lost his
law license, and was sent to prison. He also resigned from the New
York State Legislature. Mr. Morgenthau has been equally unyielding
about prosecuting errant Democrats, including the majority whip
of the state Assembly, Gloria Davis of the Bronx, and the former
chairman of the Bronx Democratic county committee, Richard Gidron,
who was indicted for evading more than $2 million in sales taxes
(and who wound up paying the money).

But being an elected official – Mr. Morgenthau is up for re-election
in November – who must depend on political fund-raising, isn’t it
hard to resist political pressures?

“It gets easier each year,” the district attorney said. “You have
fewer pressures put on you to grant favors. People know I don’t
grant favors.”

Have there ever been physical threats against him? Has anyone every
tried to bribe him?

“Never,” Mr. Morgenthau said. “Not once. And I don’t worry about these
things either. I don’t get paid to worry.”(His salary is $150,000
a year.)

Some have suggested that Mr. Morgenthau’s indifference to political
pressures as well as physical threats that a high-octane prosecutor
might attract flows from his remarkable family history. His
father, Henry Morgenthau Jr., not only served in FDR’s Cabinet with
distinction, he was also the president’s confidant. His grandfather,
Henry Morgenthau, was President Woodrow Wilson’s ambassador to Turkey,
the creator of Israel bonds and a founder of the United Jewish
Appeal. As chairman of the Greek Resettlement Commision, which had
been set up by the League of Nations, Ambassador Morgenthau helped
stop the genocide of the Armenian people. Streets in Greece – in
Salonika, Piraeus and other places – have been named after Ambassador
Morgenthau, who remains a much revered figure in the worldwide Armenian
and Greek communities.

“I was extremely close to both my father and grandfather,” Mr.
Morgenthau said. “They were certainly role models. But I also realized
early in life that I didn’t want to ride on my father’s back all my
life. I had the need to establish my own independent identity.”

That need propelled him through Amherst College and Yale Law School.
It drove him through the ranks of Patterson, Belknap & Webb. It fetched
him an appointment by President John F. Kennedy as U.S. attorney for
the Southern District. It has driven him to participate in humanitarian
activities ranging from the chairman of the Museum of Jewish Heritage –
A Living Memorial to the Holocaust to being a trustee of Smith College.

The influence of his father and grandfather, above all, has meant
a continuing emphasis by Mr. Morgenthau on probity in public and
corporate life.

“New York City has a special obligation to be an exemplar,” the
district attorney said. “We are the financial capital of the world.
We want our citizens – and the world’s citizens who come here – to feel
safe, to feel that they don’t get caught up in corrupt transactions.”

But doesn’t his emphasis on prosecuting crimes in the financial and
corporate communities dampen enthusiasm for doing business in New York?

“It’s important to pursue these cases because corporate – and political
– behavior has an impact on the cost of living in the city, and on the
cost of doing business,” Mr. Morgenthau said. “As financial pressures
mount for companies and CEOs to perform, too many tend to look the
other way when improper things are going on.

“My concern is for the economic viability of the city. Some 79% of New
York’s payroll jobs are in Manhattan. If companies and individuals
don’t pay sales and other taxes, then somebody else – usually the
common citizen – winds up making up for the slack. My office has
brought in $125 million in uncollected sales tax revenues for New
York. I also like to think that my office has made a positive impact
on generating better corporate governance.”

His office has also had setbacks in some high profile cases. The
much-publicized moves against Tyco’s Dennis Kozlowski and Mark Swartz
ended in mistrial, when one juror held out on a guilt verdict. Tyco
counsel Mark Belnick was recently acquitted on all counts.

He’s surely upset by such setbacks, the reporter asked?

“I never look back,” Mr. Morgenthau said. “I’m an incorrigible
optimist. You’re always going to win some and lose some. – there’s
always that risk. Even Ted Williams had a batting average of .406.
That meant 60% of the time he wouldn’t even get to first base. I
always do the best that I can, I always want to be satisfied that
my office has put in its best efforts. Then let the chips fall where
they may. Judges can make mistakes, too. But I’m a firm believer in
the jury system. I believe that there’s no place like America.”

That is why he’s especially concerned about the country’s – and city’s
– security. As he seeks another four-year term, Mr. Morgenthau says
he will stress anti-terrorism measures even more, developing stronger
ties with the Police Department, and accelerating cooperation with
federal and state authorities.

“We will devote more resources to interrupting the money going to
Middle East terrorist organizations,” he said, recalling earlier
successful campaigns against Arab Bank, Hudson United Bank – which
paid $5 million in fines – and others.

Then there will be greater emphasis on the use of DNA to solve crimes
and also in cases where such evidence can exonerate those wrongfully
convicted. “I believe in total fairness,” Mr. Morgenthau said. “That
also happens to be the basis of American jurisprudence.”

There will be closer scrutiny of alleged wrongdoing in the financial
community, and there will be careful examination of how persons in
positions of public trust conduct their affairs.

“It’s always got to be a level playing field,” Mr. Morgenthau said.
“Everybody’s got to play fair, everybody’s got to pay their taxes
– and everyone from the bodega to the hallowed corridors of money
need to be treated the same in the eyes of the law. I want people
to have confidence in their government, and in their law-enforcement
apparatus.”

As much as anything Mr. Morgenthau said, this last bit seemed to
capture his ethos. But there remained an important question to
ask him: He’s being challenged this year by Leslie Crocker Snyder,
a 62-year-old former judge, prosecutor, and television commentator.
Implicit in her challenge is the question of the district attorney’s
age – whether he is physically fit for the rigors of the job.

But the reporter got his answer without even having to ask the
question.

It happened this way: Mr. Morgenthau offered to drop him at his
office, which isn’t very far from the district attorney’s downtown
headquarters. On the way to Mr. Morgenthau’s car, which was parked
near the restaurant, the prosecutor walked so briskly that it was the
reporter – admittedly portly but considerably younger than his guest –
and not Robert Morgenthau, who was left short of breath.

Family’s tale illuminates old tragedy

Family’s tale illuminates old tragedy
By CAROLYN FEIBEL, STAFF WRITER

NorthJersey.com, NJ
Feb 10 2005

Penal Code 306 really makes his blood boil.

Peter Balakian, a poet and historian who grew up in Bergen County,
understands you’ve probably never heard of 306, a Turkish law enacted
last September. That’s one reason he’s trekking cross-country to
promote his book on the genocide of more than 1 million Armenians in
Turkey 90 years ago.

Penal Code 306 punishes people who speak about the genocide with up
to 10 years in prison. If Germany passed a similar law about the
Holocaust, there would rightly be a global outcry, Balakian said. On
306, there’s been hardly a peep.

In a way, Balakian said, that’s not surprising. The slaughter and
expulsion of Armenian Christians from 1915 to 1923 – the “forgotten
genocide” – has long been denied by the Turkish government. But
historians agree it was a well-documented tragedy that ushered in a
new type of state-sponsored mass killing.

Balakian, 53, teaches poetry and genocide studies at Colgate
University in New York. He grew up in Teaneck and then Tenafly, part
of North Jersey’s Armenian community. Although his grandmother was a
genocide survivor, he knew little about her story when he was a
child. His 1997 memoir, “Black Dog of Fate,” chronicles languid
Sundays spent eating cheese pastries and lamb kebabs out on the
patio. While family members celebrated Armenian foods and Armenian
painters, it was harder for them to talk about the genocide.

To fill in the gaps, Balakian began researching his own family’s
trauma. His grandmother lost her first husband in a massacre, endured
a death march with two young daughters and eventually secured their
passage to New Jersey, where she married an Armenian man working in
Paterson’s silk mills.

“She was almost a widow bride,” Balakian said. “Out of the mouth of
death.”

While promoting the memoir, Balakian realized that Americans from all
cultures have forgotten their own historical connection to the
Armenian genocide. Starting in the 1890s, he said, Turkish
persecution of Armenians was the charitable cause in the United
States, drawing in celebrities, rich industrialists, writers,
suffragists and politicians.

Balakian’s new book, “The Burning Tigris: The Armenian Genocide and
America’s Response,” aims to resurrect that forgotten history.

“It was America’s first international human rights movement, and
nothing has ever topped it in longevity or intensity,” Balakian said.
“It’s the first harnessing of a civilian response and
non-governmental organizations and philanthropy.”

Key leaders included Julia Ward Howe, a suffragist and author of “The
Battle Hymn of the Republic,” and Clara Barton, head of the American
Red Cross. The movement attracted writers (Ezra Pound, Henry James),
politicians (Theodore Roosevelt), wealthy philanthropists (John D.
Rockefeller and Henry Ford). Thousands of high schools, churches,
synagogues, Kiwanis Clubs and Rotary Clubs collected donations to
save “the starving Armenians.”

The movement raised $110 million for relief – equivalent to $1.3
billion today – for food and medical supplies for refugee camps and
schools for Armenian orphans. Donations also helped Armenians
resettle in Europe and America.

Many settled in North Jersey. Bergen County now has a thriving
community of more than 8,300 Armenian-Americans, almost 1 percent of
the population.

Balakian said the movement drew on the same utopian, spiritual
energies that fueled abolition, civil rights and feminism – but it
has largely faded from accounts of American history.

“There’s been a big misunderstanding of this, that Americans didn’t
understand this, and didn’t care,” he said. “That’s crazy.”

Balakian recounts in the book how the word “genocide” and the phrase
“crimes against humanity” were first coined in response to the
Armenian slaughter. But he said the grass-roots movement could not
persuade the U.S. government to intervene.

“My book is the story of American gridlock,” he said. “We have the
people petitioning for real intervention and real justice and we have
the State Department refusing to take political action.”

Balakian believes the book could help to reawaken Americans to the
roots of their human rights activities.

“It set in motion the traditions we now have for international human
rights work and activism, such as Amnesty [International], the
engagements with the Balkans … and the Holocaust Museum. All owe
something to a process that started back then in the period of the
1890s to 1920s.”

Why did Lavrov visit Baku

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
February 7, 2005, Monday

WHY DID LAVROV VISIT BAKU

by WPS observer

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov’s visit to Azerbaijan finished
last week. Making preparations for opening of the Year of Azerbaijan
in Russia on February 16 was the formal cause for the visit. It is
intended that Vladimir Putin and Ilkham Aliyev will open the
celebrations, however, many observers state that Lavrov’s visit to
Baku was linked with Moscow’s initiatives in the sector of
integration in the post-Soviet republics. To all appearances, the
Russian and Azerbaijanian leaders will discuss these issues in the
Russian capital. The victory of the “orange revolution” in Ukraine
has shown that Russia is losing its influence in the CIS. In the
meantime, Azerbaijan where clans close to the Aliyev family managed
to suppress protests and create the succession of the political
system intends to enlist Moscow’s support in order to prevent the
Ukrainian or Georgian scenario.

The Karabakh problem is another probable objective of Baku’s
intention to integrate with Moscow. Azerbaijanian officials denied
reports that Lavrov discussed the prospects of Azerbaijan joining the
Organization of the collective security treaty in Baku. To all
appearances, Baku does not rule out military operations against
Nagorny Karabakh, and intends to activate military contacts with
Russia on a bilateral basis. At the same time, Azerbaijan does not
forget about NATO.

Moscow’s comments on integration processes between Azerbaijan and
NATO were neutral. Sergei Lavrov stated that Baku must determine the
form of co-operation with NATO. He noted that Moscow also makes
contacts with the alliance.

In the meantime, Russia supports Armenia, which has been defending
Nagorny Karabakh for almost 15 years. On the other hand, Moscow
states that the Karabakh conflict must be resolved as soon as
possible. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated that in
Slavonic University in Baku on February 2 that “we help the sides
find solutions to the crisis proceeding from the people’s interests.
We are pleased that the Armenian and Azerbaijanian foreign ministers
have resumed contacts within the framework of the Prague process.”

In the meantime, tension in the region increases, and both sides are
prepared to use force. The military budgets have increased in Armenia
and Azerbaijan. Baku states that it may use force for solving the
Karabakh problem. Under these circumstances, Karabakh and Armenia are
forced to prepare for defending their territory. Sergei Oganyan,
Defense Minister of Nagorny Karabakh, stated that servicemen’s wages
will increase in 2005. The leadership will also focus on solving the
housing problem. The command of the army will focus on
military-patriotic education of younger generations. Public
structures will participate in this process. The command of the army
will analyze the experience of the partisan war in the first phase of
the Azerbaijanian-Karabakh confrontation. This means that if
Azerbaijan ventures to use force the war will be very long. The
conflicting sides are prepared for this.

Azerbaijan enlisted the support of US. President George W. Bush sent
the Memorandum to prolong the suspension of the 907th amendments to
the Freedom Act, which bans military aid to Azerbaijan, to the US
state secretary in January 2005. According to the document, the US
made this decision because of Azerbaijan’s assistance in combating
terrorism. This document “is aimed at increasing the security of
Azerbaijan’s border”. The US leader stated that this decision would
not hinder negotiations between Azerbaijan and Armenia. In other
words, Azerbaijan will receive substantial resources, which will be
spent on supporting its army.

In this regard, Elizabeth Jones’ statement about the necessity of
neutralizing the criminal regimes in the Trans-Dniester territory,
Abkhazia, Southern Ossetia and Nagorny Karabakh was to the point.
Washington again reiterated its position to the world, “Washington’s
policy towards the conflict in Nagorny Karabakh has not changed. The
US does not consider Nagorny Karabakh as an independent state, and
the international community and the United States does not
acknowledge its leadership. The US supports Azerbaijan’s territorial
integrity and thinks that the status of Nagorny Karabakh must be
determined by means of negotiations within the framework of the Minsk
process. The US is involved in the process of peaceful settling of
the conflict. We welcome negotiations between the Armenian and
Azerbaijanian foreign ministers.”

On the one hand, there is nothing blameworthy in these words. The US
supports peace but this statement can be interpreted in different
ways in the context of events happening in Baku. This may become a
weighty argument for unleashing war.

Why is the US interested in this affair? Many analysts agree that the
US is interested in Azerbaijan as a beachhead for delivering strikes
on Iran. This is why Washington supports Baku.

We hope that the Azerbaijanian leadership will be reasonable and
tolerant, and that the Russian leaders and US will make important
decisions regarding the Karabakh conflict at the summit in February
where the presidents intend to discuss the issue of conflicts in the
post-Soviet republics. Otherwise, the situation may lead to
recommencement of hostilities.

Translated by Alexander Dubovoi

BAKU: Democracy Way to Get Breakaway Area Back Amid War Calls

Azeri paper says democracy is way to get breakaway area back amid war calls

Azadliq, Baku
2 Feb 05

Text of unattributed report by Azerbaijani newspaper Azadliq on 2
February headlined “‘You can have Karabakh back only in one way: it is
democracy'” and subheaded “The co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group,
Bernard Fassier, put pressure on I. Aliyev”

The new French co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, Bernard Fassier,
met Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev during his diplomatic visit to
Baku last week. The French visitor said that the calls for renewed
war in Azerbaijan are not taken seriously in Europe. Fassier said:
“They believe in Europe that such calls may be aimed at covering up
the wish for democracy of the Azerbaijani people and it’s naive to
hope that Nagornyy Karabakh can be liberated in such a way.”

Fassier added that under the circumstances the renewal of military
hostilities may be perceived across the world “as the fight for
influence between the two authoritarian regimes and both countries may
face serious sanctions”.

Fassier said: “I would like to say that this is the position not only
of France, but also of the EU.”

At the same time, other aspects of the issue are also interesting.
First, Azerbaijan has been in such a poor situation that a co-chairman
of the commission established to resolve the conflict dares to issue
an ultimatum to the Azerbaijani government.

Second, an explicit message has been sent to the Azerbaijani
government and the public that the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict can be
resolved in Azerbaijan’s favour only after it introduces democratic
reforms.

Third, even in Europe they know that Azerbaijan’s propaganda for a
solution to the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict is insincere. They can well
see that the mafia-type government of Azerbaijan is anyway not in a
belligerent mood and all such calls are just a fake.

Fourth, all the EU member states advocate a solution to the Karabakh
problem in the interests of a country which shares EU
values. Undoubtedly, if there is a democratic regime in Azerbaijan,
any possible solution to this problem in Azerbaijan’s favour will
satisfy the whole democratic world. However, if democratic changes
were to occur in Armenia before Azerbaijan, the Nagornyy Karabakh
problem may be resolved in Armenia’s favour once and for all. The fact
is that any democratic changes in Azerbaijan are not about the desire
of any political force for power, but about the country’s territorial
integrity.

Finally, it should also be noted that a lot of money is required to
wage a war. The government of Azerbaijan, where 60 per cent of the
economy works for the “black market”, does not intend to pursue a
war. The slogan “everything for the motherland” usually works in
countries at war, while in Azerbaijan there is unlikely to be any
alternative to the slogan “everything for the governing
clan”. Moreover, since the Azerbaijani military industrial complex is
also involved in corruption, only an idiot can think of fighting with
the resources at its disposal.

BAKU: Bush-Putin meeting to form new policy on Karabakh problem

Bush-Putin meeting to form new policy on Karabakh problem – Azeri ex-minister

Yeni Azarbaycan, Baku
26 Jan 05

Azerbaijan’s former foreign minister has said the USA’s policy on the
South Caucasus will undergo fundamental changes under the new US
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. In his interview with the
pro-government newspaper Yeni Azarbaycan, Tofiq Zulfuqarov said that
the USA now realizes that the “frozen” conflicts are hampering
economic development, as well as social and political reforms in the
region. Zulfuqarov added that US President George W. Bush and Russian
President Vladimir Putin will adopt a new policy on the settlement of
the conflicts in the South Caucasus during their forthcoming meeting
in Bratislava. The following is the text of Rufat Ahmad’s report by
Azerbaijani newspaper Yeni Azarbaycan on 26 January headlined “Neither
the USA, nor Russia are happy with the situation in the South
Caucasus” and subheaded “America insists on resolving the
conflicts”. Subheadings have been inserted editorially:

The White House is not happy with Russia’s position on the frozen
conflicts in the South Caucasus. The US stand has become even tougher
since the former national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, took
over as secretary of state. The Bush administration’s serious
criticism of Russia over the last week has become even harsher in
Rice’s statements. She said that the no war no peace situation in the
region poses a serious threat to the development of democracy.

On the other hand, the fact that the Kremlin has come under criticism
ahead of the Bush-Putin meeting in Bratislava next month has given
political analysts serious food for thought. The discussions on the
South Caucasus between the two world centres of power will help
improve the situation in any case, because Russian Foreign Minister
Sergey Lavrov who commented on Rice’s critical remarks has said that
his country is ready to hear constructive criticism.

What kind of effect can Rice’s statement have on the situation in the
South Caucasus? We asked Azerbaijan’s former foreign minister, Tofiq
Zulfuqarov, to comment on this.

New South Caucasus policy

Correspondent Does this criticism mean that the White House is trying
to take the initiative in the region?

Zulfuqarov The USA and Russia have said at different levels that they
share a common position on the settlement of conflicts in the region
and that they are trying to resolve the conflicts peacefully. The
statement made by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is a new
factor. At least it shows that cooperation between the USA and Russia
in mediating the settlement of the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict, which
emerged as a result of the Armenian aggression against Azerbaijan,
will undergo certain changes. In that respect, the Bratislava meeting
will form a new policy on the conflicts in the South Caucasus.

Correspondent Russia stepped up its activities immediately after the
statement of the US secretary of state. What do you think is the link
between Lavrov’s visit to the South Caucasus and this statement?

Zulfuqarov To be honest, the long-lasting cooperation between the USA
and Russia has not resolved the conflicts. In fact, there is no
progress in these conflicts. The only achievement is that the
cease-fire has been secured. However, the sides are still far from a
political settlement to the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict. From this
point of view, it cannot be ruled out that some political circles in
Russia have realized the importance of changing the current policy.

After Condoleezza Rice’s statement, Sergey Lavrov was also expected to
criticize the opposite side. From this point of view, mutual criticism
shows that both countries are not happy with the current
situation. And this is a positive factor, because the mutually
critical statements are expected to be followed by discussions that
will clarify the situation. I think that some approaches and a more
active position will emerge during these discussions, which is in our
interests.

Conflicts hamper reforms

Correspondent The Astana meeting was followed by some activity
regarding Nagornyy Karabakh. The Bratislava meeting will cover a
broader aspect. What possible changes may Russia and the USA make to
their policies after discussing the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict in
Bratislava?

Zulfuqarov Under Colin Powell, the Department of State and the
Department of Defence had different views on different issues,
including the South Caucasus. The Security Council gave more
prominence to Donald Rumsfeld’s position on the South Caucasus. From
this point of view, Rice’s appointment as secretary of state will lead
to fundamental changes in US policy on our region. US political
circles already realize that other goals will be difficult to achieve
until the conflicts are resolved. The White House is not hiding its
intentions. Economic development, social and political reforms will
drag on as long as the conflicts have not been resolved. From this
point of view, the frozen conflicts should have been resolved a long
time ago.

The USA will be more insistent on this policy. This insistence will
manifest itself in various spheres. I think that the USA will be
active in its policy on the countries of the region, as well as
Russia.

Correspondent Do you expect any activity in the settlement of the
South Caucasus conflicts in the near future?

Zulfuqarov The Azerbaijani government has made it clear that the main
issue hampering the development of the country is the Armenian
occupation of Nagornyy Karabakh. Work has been carried out in this
direction. Now the situation is more favourable for these statements
to yield results. Naturally, our policy will also become more active
after the Bratislava meeting, because one can sense the desire of the
centres of power to resolve the problems.