BAKU: BBC says its reports from Karabakh “translated incorrectly” -A

BBC says its reports from Karabakh “translated incorrectly” – Azeri TV

ANS TV, Baku
19 May 04

[Presenter in studio] The Azerbaijani embassy in Great Britain
has asked the administration of the BBC for an explanation over its
correspondent Steven Eke’s visit to the territory of Nagornyy Karabakh
without the official permission of the Azerbaijani government and
over the prejudiced reports prepared from there. In response, the BBC
administration claims that Eke’s reports were not translated correctly.

[Correspondent over video of Bush House, people sitting in front of
computers, views of Karabakh] The administration of the BBC World
Service is going to provide an explanation to the Azerbaijani Foreign
Ministry over a visit by the BBC radio correspondent, Steven Eke,
to the occupied Azerbaijani territory, Nagornyy Karabakh, without the
permission of the official Baku. This has been said to us by the head
of the Foreign Ministry’s press service, Matin Mirza.

On the ministry’s instruction the Azerbaijani ambassador to Great
Britain, Rafael Ibrahimov, is also trying to deal with the issue.

[Spokeswoman for the Azerbaijani embassy in Great Britain S. Dadasova,
captioned, over phone] The Azerbaijani ambassador to Great Britain,
Rafael Ibrahimov, contacted the administration of the Eurasia service
of the BBC over this visit by a BBC correspondent, both in writing
and by phone, to express the discontent of the Azerbaijani side.

[Correspondent] The head of the Azerbaijani diplomatic mission in
London has also voiced the Azerbaijani side’s concern about the
pro-Armenian position of the BBC correspondent. The head of the
BBC’s Eurasia section, Behrouz Afagh, said that the visit at issue
was paid to Nagornyy Karabakh through the territory of Armenia
only for pragmatic reasons and did not bear any anti-Azerbaijani
undertone. Behrouz Afagh also expressed interest in Azerbaijan’s
entry regulations. It was stated to the senior BBC representative
that it is possible to enter the territory of Azerbaijan only with
the official permission of the Azerbaijani authorities and in line
with the established regulations. Behrouz Afagh said that the reports
prepared from Nagornyy Karabakh must have been translated incorrectly,
which, in its turn, led to this misunderstanding. According to the
BBC official, a letter will be sent to relevant Azerbaijani bodies
to clarify the issue.

Let me say again that this was said by the head of the BBC’s Eurasia
section, Behrouz Afagh.

Sevda Hasanova, ANS.

[Presenter] A short while ago the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry
received a letter from the BBC administration. According to the
ministry’s spokesman, Matin Mirza, in the letter the head of the
Eurasia section of the BBC, Behrouz Afagh, is justifying the fact that
a BBC correspondent went to Nagornyy Karabakh through the territory of
Armenia. The letter says that everyone is using this route. Asking
the Azerbaijani side not to introduce a political touch to the
issue, the BBC official said that all the necessary chronological and
statistical information is always obtained from Baku. It says further
that the Russian-language reports only represented an exchange of
opinion between people of different social categories. What is rather
illogical, however, is that the BBC administration says in its letter
to the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry that it accepts all the complaints
and is ready to discuss the issue directly with representatives of
the Azerbaijani embassy in Great Britain.

from Dziunik: Amb. Martirosyan’s speech at the Security Council

Permanent Mission of the Republic of Armenia
to the United Nations
119E 36th street, New York, NY 10016
Tel.: 1-212-686-9079
Fax: 1-212-686-3934
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:

May 18, 2004

PRESS RELEASE

Ambassador Martirosyan speaks at the UN Security Council open debate on
“United Nations Peacekeeping Operations”

On May 17, 2004, Amb. Armen Martirosyan, Permanent Representative of Armenia
to the UN, made a speech at the UN Security Council open debate under
Pakistani Presidency on the “United Nations Peacekeeping Operations.” In
his speech he noted the recent progress made by Armenia in the field of
peacekeeping. Additionally, he touched upon several important issues that
could be considered as necessary precursors for effective intervention by
the United Nations in different parts of the world.

Please find below the text of the speech in full.

May 17, 2004

SECURITY COUNCIL
4970th Meeting
United Nations Peacekeeping Operations

Statement by H.E. Mr. Armen MARTIROSYAN, Ambassador, Permanent
Representative of the Republic of Armenia to the United Nations

Mr. President,

Since this is the first time that my delegation takes the floor this
month, allow me to begin by extending my congratulations to you on
your assumption of the Presidency of the Security Council and assure
you of my delegation’s full support for the Council work.

Mr. President,

The open debate on the UN peacekeeping operations is of paramount
importance as the organization is currently planning for at least four
new peacekeeping missions and is contemplating a possible expansion of
its activities in Iraq. This debate is held at a time when questions
are asked about the efficacy of the current peacekeeping operations in
Africa, Asia and Europe and the means and ways to improve them. It is
conducted when the Organization is making its first steps to address
security and developmental challenges in conflict areas through
integrated peacebuilding approaches.

It is indubitable that peacekeeping operations have made
great headways during the last decade developing from classical
peacekeeping operations into extremely complex ones encompassing
conflict management, confidence-building and post-conflict
peace-building. Sometimes, inadvertently, it has found itself carrying
out peacemaking functions in rather complicated situations raising
doubts about the legitimacy and successfulness of its actions under
such circumstances. Despite the fact, that all those issues have been
duly analyzed by the High-level panel headed by Mr. Lakhdar Brahimi
and subsequently reflected in its report presented to the General
Assembly in March 2000, we still ponder over the same issues when
the question of a new peacekeeping operation comes up.

Mr. President,

Armenia is making its first small steps in this field. In 2003, Armenia
made a decision to participate in NATO-led peacekeeping operation
in Kosovo (KFOR). Since February 2004, a platoon of thirty-four
peacekeepers from Armenian Armed Forces is operating as part of the
Greek forces of the U.S.-led multinational brigade in KFOR.

In 2003 Armenia hosted NATO “Partnership for Peace” (PfP) Exercises
“Cooperative Best effort – 2003”, the main goal of which was the
planning of interaction between PfP nations during the peacekeeping
operations.

As we are becoming part of the international community that strives
to bring peace in different parts of the world, we want to make
sure that the efforts are well spent and rewarded by creation of
self-sustainable peace in those areas.

In this respect, my delegation would like to raise several issues
that it believes could be considered as necessary precursors for
effective intervention.

1. The issue of the regionalization of conflict or regional
dimension of conflict has to be taken into account when planning for
peacekeeping operations. Transborder armed groups, illegal trafficking
and trade, transborder social networks are issues that should not be
overlooked when considering the establishment of security environment,
humanitarian assistance, disarmament, demobilization and reintegration
(DDR). Such an approach, despite its extreme complexity, may prove to
be more effective if duly considered in all its aspects for its impact
in such operations as the one that is currently being discussed for
the Sudan.

2. UN peacekeeping operations for the last decade have evolved
into multifaceted and multidimensional ones. Yet, probably, the
time has come to contemplate the idea of the establishment of
multiphased operations as well where a gradual development from
peacekeeping to peacebuilding is planned in advance as part of one
operation. Apart from providing an opportunity for better planning
for the transition from military phase to developmental phase in the
peacekeeping operation, it would also send the right message to the
war-torn communities about the sound commitment of the international
community to help to reconstruct the social fabric of the country in
such a manner that it would be able to sustain the hard-achieved peace
and advance on the path to democracy and rule-of-law on its own. The
identification of the “end state” that the peacekeeping operation aims
to achieve might set the right agenda for the programs and projects
to be implemented on the ground.

In this respect we cannot overstress the need for tangible results
to keep the hope from dwindling and to prevent the resumption of
conflict. “Quick impact projects” could be one way of making real
difference in the lives of people, and consequently in their minds.

3. We do realize that this kind of planning would require proper
analysis of the situation on the ground and the roots and causes
of the conflict. Yet we believe that it should be a priority in the
consideration of peacekeeping operation in the first place. As the
past experience shows, no operation is successful if it does not
address the deep-rooted grievances, the causes of the conflict and
does not take into account its dynamics.

Mr. President,

Holistic understanding of the range of security and developmental
challenges in conflict areas and developing programmes based on
those realities, and sometimes worst-case scenarios, and not the
theoretical models of best assumption might help to address the need
for urgent improvement of the ways the United Nations deals with
conflict situations. Keeping the pledges made, be those political
or financial, would help to transform the United Nations into an
organization that is capable of successfully fulfilling its founding
mandate: “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war”.

Thank you Mr. President.

END

http://www.un.int/armenia/

New Armenian Bodies To Resolve Community’s Problems

New Armenian Bodies To Resolve Community’s Problems

The Federation of Jewish Communities of the CIS (FJC), Russia
May 17 2004

YEREVAN, Armenia – On May 12th, the Jewish Community Center ‘Mordechay
Navi’ of Yerevan hosted a meeting between Rabbi Gersh Meir Burshtein
and the head of the Armenian Department on National Minorities, Granush
Kharatyan, and the Director of the Religious Affairs Department Vardan
Asatryan. The two government officials represented a group of elected
deputies who are responsible for relations with national organizations
in the country.

At the outset of 2004 and as a result of national organizations’
activities, which managed to draw the government’s attention, the
Armenian government founded these two state bodies. At the same time,
Armenia’s entry to the Council of Europe has meant that the Armenian
government has had to meet a series of international obligations with
respect to national minorities’ organizations. Thus, the Armenian
government has is already developing a law on national minorities.

During the meeting, the officials gave a positive evaluation about
the activities carried out the Jewish community of Armenia, especially
their work in reviving Jewish life in Yerevan and the country’s other
regions. Rabbi Burshtein, in his turn, stressed the importance of
the state’s assistance to national communities and noted that the
law on national minorities was essential in this regard, at the same
time noting the limitations that today’s laws do not account for the
size of national communities and do not allow national schools to
undergo registration and obtain a free buildings for its educational
institutions.

Rabbi Burnshtein also emphasized the need to reconstruct old Jewish
cemeteries and to restitute the property of national communities.
Today, the Jewish community of Armenia remains helpless to prove that
the destruction of the city’s old Jewish synagogue, despite the fact
that it appears on old city’s maps. Unfortunately, no official data
confirms the fact that the synagogue once existed but was eventually
destroyed.

Rabbi Burshtein hopes that the new state bodies will mean the
resolution of the many essential needs still existing for Armenia’s
Jewish community.

US National Security Advisor to visit Moscow

US National Security Advisor to visit Moscow

RosBusinessConsulting, Russia
May 14 2004

RBC, 14.05.2004, Moscow 09:29:37.US National Security Advisor
Condoleezza Rice will arrive in Moscow today. Among other issues,
Rice is planning to discuss prospects of settling the Nagorny Karabakh
(Azerbaijan) conflict. In the course of her visit to Russia, Rice is
also planning to discuss political processes that are taking place in
the Caucuses in general. Rice is also expected to discuss the situation
in Iraq and the Middle East with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! –
Internet access at a great low price.

http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/

Queen of the movie bosses

Queen of the movie bosses
by Dominic Rushe

Sunday Times (London)
May 9, 2004, Sunday

How Amy Pascal became the most powerful woman in Hollywood.

The office in which Hollywood legend Louis B Mayer once “auditioned”
starlets has been taken over by Amy Pascal. But apart from a shelf
of snow shakers made to commemorate movies she helped to pro- duce,
she has yet to stamp her personality on it.

White-walled and sparsely furnished, the room could be the lobby of
an upmarket hotel. It seems too antiseptic for Pascal, who is chic
in a bohemian way dressed in black, with a long string of pearls,
and hair that is a mass of red curls.

Pascal proudly showed off the tiny anteroom where Mayer, the final
M in Metro Goldwyn Mayer, had his casting couch.

It leads on to a huge balcony with views of the Hollywood hills.

“I’m thinking of having meetings out here, maybe some plants,”
she said.

If Pascal has yet to leave her imprint on Mayer’s office in the Art
Deco Thalberg building in Culver City, she has certainly made her mark
on the industry. She has just released a record five profitable films
in a row (Gothika, Hellboy, 13 Going on 30, Secret Window and 50 First
Dates) and has been elevated to chairman of Sony’s motion-pictures
group, owner of Columbia Tristar.

Pascal -Hollywood’s most powerful woman, according to Forbes magazine
-is preparing to release what could be her biggest gamble to date:
the $ 200m (£110m) summer blockbuster, Spiderman 2.

Sony is also, ironically, in talks to take over the now troubled MGM.
Mayer’s old studio still makes the James Bond movies, but its glory
days are long gone. MGM’s back catalogue is now more valuable than
its film-making unit.

Just down the corridor from Pascal is another office that is also
beginning to bear the signature of a new owner. Less flash, the room
is home to London-born Michael Lynton, the former chief executive of
AOL Time Warner Europe and now Pascal’s boss.

Despite a brief stint at Disney’s ill-fated Hollywood Pictures,
Lynton is an outsider. A self-portrait by Stanley Spencer hangs on his
wall. “People think it’s Harry Potter,” he said. Lynton’s literary
tastes appear to be more highbrow. The office has a bookcase of
well-thumbed Penguin classics -he once ran the company.

Both books and movies are businesses that people get into because
they are “completely in love” with the product, said Lynton.

“If somebody comes in from left-field, people understandably ask
why he is entitled to that position,” he said. “I don’t presume
to be the movie picker. I am an outsider. It is useful to have an
outside perspective as long as the person can take his ego out of
the equation.”

Pascal’s unit is a shining star in a troubled company. Sony is carrying
$ 12.8billion in debt and is in the middle of a huge restructuring. The
company’s consumer-electronics division is still underperforming and
its music business – along with those of its rivals -is struggling
to fight off the threat of piracy and consumer apathy.

Lynton’s appointment was not a total surprise. Sir Howard Stringer,
Sony Corporation’s chairman, pulled a similar move last year, putting
in another outsider, NBC television executive Andrew Lack, to run
the group’s music division.

But with Sony Pictures doing so well, this time rival studio executives
were expecting fireworks between Pascal and Lynton. “They’ll fall
out. They always do,” said one. But so far the two seem to get along
in classic Hollywood odd-couple style.

“It was a shotgun marriage but we found true love,” said Pascal. She
will concentrate on movies while Lynton will ensure that Sony is
making as much money as possible out of its films. He will also keep
an eye on the broader picture.

The industry has probably never undergone a time of greater change,
said Lynton.

“Studios are very complicated enterprises; there are a lot of moving
parts. Amy has done, and continues to do, a brilliant job putting
together this great slate of movies.

“That said, there is a broader agenda that the studio has to contend
with on distribution, television programming and issues of piracy.
It’s helpful to have two heads.”

While Pascal prepares Spiderman to face his next opponent, Dr Octopus,
Lynton is up against an equally tricky opponent.

Kirk Kerkorian was six years old when MGM released its first picture.
Born in Fresno, California, in 1917, Kerkorian grew up the son of poor
raisin farmers in a small colony of Armenian immigrants. He was given
his first break, and a passion for flying, by the aviator Florence
“Pancho” Barnes, Hollywood’s first woman stunt pilot. During the second
world war, he enlisted with the RAF, ferrying planes from Canada to
England. After the war he started an airline with the purchase of a
single plane.

Eighty years later Kerkorian is the 33rd richest man in America, with
a $ 6billion fortune based on buying low and selling high. Since 1969
he has ownedMGM three times and sold it twice. Now it appears he is
trying to even the scores.

Sony and MGM will not comment, but MGM has delayed its annual meeting
to review “strategic options”.

MGM is the last independent studio in Hollywood. All its rivals are
owned by giant media combines. Warner Brothers, for example, is owned
by Time Warner, 20th Century Fox by News Corporation, ultimate owner
of The Sunday Times.

Sony and two private-equity firms, Texas Pacific Group and Providence
Equity Partners, are thought to be offering $ 5billion for MGM.

Kerkorian, who controls 75% of MGM, has held talks with Sony about
a deal before, but they came to nothing after a disagreement over
price. This time MGM watchers believe a deal may work. “At this price
it is more likely than before,” said Mike Savner, an analyst at Banc
of America.

Without the financial muscle of a parent group such as News Corp
or Time Warner, Savner said MGM will struggle and its fortunes will
continue to decline.

Of MGM’s $ 1.9billion revenues last year, $ 1billion came from its
home-entertainment division. MGM has a back catalogue of 4,000 films.
Among others it owns West Side Story, the Rocky movies, Terminator,
19 Woody Allens, and a handful of Ingmar Bergmans. It also owns the
rights to the James Bond, Pink Panther and Addams Family movies.

Old films have rarely been so valuable. The proliferation of cable
channels, services like video-on-demand, and DVD sales have made old
movies hot commodities.

DVD sales rose 43% last year, with American firms netting $ 14.9billion
in worldwide sales. More than two-thirds of those sales now come from
old movies.

Lynton compares the film industry today with the book business after
the second world war. The arrival of cheap paperbacks made classics
like Dickens or Dostoevsky available to a whole new audience and
fuelled a huge sales boom. “There are so many analogies between the
book business, which is now a mature business, and the film business
today,” he said.

In a notoriously high-risk business, DVD holds out the promise of
greater stability. Perhaps like the music industry and its CD-fuelled
growth years, DVD sales will prove a temporary phenomenon. But for now,
Hollywood thinks it has struck gold.

DVD sales may be low risk, but the blockbuster is getting ever more
expensive and frightening. To a large degree, it has always been this
way. As Hollywood chronicler John Gregory Dunne wrote in The Studio:
“Hollywood is a technological crapshoot. Table stakes open at a
million dollars.” But Dunne’s insider book on 20th Century Fox was
written in 1968. Since then the stakes have become even bigger.

With so many big films coming out over the summer, and movies being
released so quickly on DVD and pay-per-view TV, the business has
changed, said Pascal. “The old equation in Hollywood was that a movie
would rake in eight times its opening weekend. These days the opening
weekends have got bigger but the ratio has fallen to four times,”
she said.

Whereas a few years ago the studios would stagger their “event” movies,
these days cinema goers are being bombarded with blockbusters week
after week during the summer.

Some films, for example Tom Cruise’s The Last Samurai, are now so
expensive they hardly make money. Their cinematic run is almost an
extended advertisement for DVD and other post-cinema sales.

Two dozen movies that cost more than $ 100m to make are due for
release this summer in what is sure to be a cut-throat battle. Last
summer was littered with hyped movies that proved to be duds. They
included The Hulk and Matrix Reloaded.

The rewards for hitting it big are immense and, as MGM learnt to its
cost, it doesn’t matter how good your back catalogue is if you are
not producing new movies and franchises.

The first Spiderman film raked in $ 800m and made stars of Tobey
Maguire and Kirsten Dunst, proving there is a worldwide appetite for
the webslinger. Pascal and Sony have a lot riding on Spiderman 2, which
opens in Britain on July 15, not to mention Spiderman 3 due for 2007.

Sequels are increasingly popular in Hollywood but as The Matrix series
showed, they do not always live up to expectations. With Spiderman,
Pascal seems confident she has a three-part winner. “It’s very hard
to make sequels,” she said. “The ones that work best are the ones
that were meant to be serialised in the first place.”

Pascal said she saw a clear three-part narrative for Spiderman from the
start. The first is about childhood and discovery, the second about
the confusion of adolescence, and the third about the challenges of
becoming an adult.

But most of all, she said, it is about getting the greatest number
of people to come and see a great story. “My job is most of all about
the story. Without that you have nothing at all.”

Louis B Mayer would no doubt have agreed.

Parliament Speaker Hopes For Situation In Armenia To Settle “Via Pol

PARLIAMENT SPEAKER HOPES FOR SITUATION IN ARMENIA TO SETTLE “VIA POLITICAL
DIALOGUE”

11.05.2004 15:42

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ All political forces represented in the
Parliament of Armenia will do their best to establish a new
political situation in the country and will solve the problems via
political dialogue. Chairman of the National Assembly of Armenia Artur
Baghdasarian told it to journalists yesterday, after the completion of
the recurrent phase of political consultations between representatives
of the ruling coalition and the opposition over the settlement of
the domestic situation in the country. In his opinion, the political
consultations, which began after hard four-month discussions in
the Parliament, have born first fruits. Representatives of the
Republican Party of Armenia, Orinats Yerkir and Dashnaktsutyun,
People’s Deputy group, United Labor Party faction, Justice bloc
and National Unification faction have agreed to start political
dialogue. Thereupon a corresponding agenda will be formed on May
13. As Secretary of Justice opposition faction Victor Dallakian
told journalists in his turn, “coalition representatives asked for
two days to express their attitude to the opposition proposals.” In
his words, May 12 the coalition will present a corresponding written
proposal. Having discussed it, the opposition will decide whether to
continue the talks or not. It should be reminded that the question on
“the ways of overcoming the political crisis formed in Armenia after
the presidential election in 2003” is included in the agenda of the
negotiations.

Armenia president not to attend NATO summit in Istanbul

Armenia president not to attend NATO summit in Istanbul

ITAR-TASS, Russia
May 10 2004

YEREVAN, May 10 (Itar-Tass) -President Robert Kocharyan of Armenia
will not take part in the NATO summit in Istanbul late in June,
presidential press secretary Ashot Kocharyan said on Monday.

He said in an interview with Tass this decision “is explained by
the current state of Armenian-Turkish relations.” “No progress in
bilateral relations was seen in 2003,” the press secretary said.
“Armenia reiterates its readiness to improve relations with Turkey
without preliminary conditions,” he said.

Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan will represent the country
at Istanbul’s summit. The press secretary said relations between
Armenia and NATO “are developing on the line of ascent within the
framework of the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme.”

He reminded that in 2003 the president visited Brussels, where he
met with high-ranking NATO officials as well as took part in NATO
summits in Washington and Prague.

Moscou perd un levier d’influence dans le Caucase

Tageblatt, Luxembourg
7 Mai 2004

Moscou perd un levier d’influence dans le Caucase avec le départ
d’Abachidzé

Les autorités géorgiennes se sont félicitées jeudi du rôle qu’a joué
la Russie dans la démission pacifique du chef adjar Aslan Abachidzé,
qui était le meilleur allié de Moscou en Géorgie, et dont le départ
retire au Kremlin un puissant levier d’influence dans les affaires de
cette république du Caucase.
»La Russie nous a accordé une aide importante», s’est félicité jeudi
à Moscou le chef de la diplomatie géorgienne Salomé Zourabichvili,
après un entretien avec son homologue russe Sergueï Lavrov.

Ce dernier s’est affirmé »tout à fait satisfait que la situation en
Adjarie ait été réglée d’une manière pacifique et qu’on ait réussi à
éviter une effusion de sang, ce sur quoi avait toujours insisté la
partie russe».

Dans un scénario similaire à celui ayant vu le départ en novembre
dernier du président géorgien Edouard Chevardnadzé, sous la pression
de la rue, le chef de la république autonome géorgienne d’Adjarie,
Aslan Abachidzé, a abandonné ses fonctions sans grande résistance.

Dans les deux cas, les démissionnaires s’étaient entretenus peu avant
leur départ avec Igor Ivanov, qui était chef de la diplomatie russe
l’automne dernier et agissait mercredi soir en tant que secrétaire du
Conseil de sécurité de son pays.

Depuis la fin de l’URSS en 1991, le Kremlin s’est efforcé de
maintenir son influence sur cette zone stratégique du Caucase, verrou
méridional face à la Turquie, membre de l’Otan, et à l’Iran.

Les premiers outils de cette influence restent à ce jour les deux
bases militaires russes encore présentes en Géorgie, rassemblant un
total théorique de 7.000 hommes, et dont l’une se trouve en Adjarie.
Avec celle de Gümri, en Arménie voisine, elles dessinent une ligne
face à la Turquie.

»Ces bases ne sont pas seulement un stabilisateur de la situation
intérieure géorgienne, mais aussi un stabilisateur de nos intérêts
dans le Caucase», a rappelé mercredi le général russe Léonid Ivachov,
ex-responsable des relations extérieures du ministère de la Défense.

Aslan Abachidzé était le deuxième agent de cette influence, comme
l’avait souligné mercredi le quotidien russe Kommersant. »Dès qu’il
disparaîtra, la Russie perdra (…) un puissant levier d’influence
sur la situation dans la Transcaucasie», observait le journal.

Moscou a joué sans vergogne des tendances séparatistes en Géorgie
dans les années 90, en soutenant celles des Abkhazes et des Ossètes
du sud, dont les territoires contrôlent deux des trois voies de
franchissement de la chaîne du Caucase.

Un jeu semblable s’est mis en place à l’automne dernier, après la
démission du président géorgien Edouard Chevardnadzé, rentré dans les
bonnes grâces du Kremlin, quand la Russie a suggéré qu’elle pourrait
offrir un système de visas simplifié pour les Géorgiens d’Adjarie.

Mais à chaque fois, Moscou a fini par choisir la voie du pragmatisme,
en lâchant des féaux confrontés à une véritable contestation
populaire et rejetés de surcroît par les Etats-Unis.

Car Washington a son mot à dire dans l’affaire, avec la construction
en cours à travers la Géorgie d’un oléoduc pour le transport vers les
marchés occidentaux des hydrocarbures de l’Azerbaïdjan voisin et, au
delà, du Kazakhstan et du Turkménistan.

»Les Etats-Unis et l’Europe nous ont sérieusement aidés dans le
dialogue et nous avons reçu leur soutien total», a remarqué jeudi Mme
Zourabichvili.

Le pragmatisme de la Russie pourrait être récompensé, alors que
Moscou négocie un retrait de ses bases avec Tbilissi, et compte sur
une plus grande coopération de la Géorgie pour éliminer les bases
arrières des rebelles tchétchènes censées se trouver sur son
territoire.

World Bank to Armenia

A1 Plus | 15:21:35 | 05-05-2004 | Economy |

WORLD BANK TO ARMENIA

On Tuesday, World Bank approved three credit projects on Armenia.

Under the first of them, Armenia’s State Sector Modernization program, the
WB allocates 10 million 150 thousand USD.

The WB offers another $23 million for water-supply needs. The credit will
make water supply in Armenian provinces more effective, but drinking water
problem will remain unsolved for at least four years, says the head of WB
Yerevan office Roger Robinson.

The Bank has also pledged 1 million 74 thousand USD for Armenian Agriculture
Reform program implementation.

Total amount of the money the World Bank has already credited to Armenia
makes 789 million 9 thousand USD.

Armenian Church’s Crack-Down on Sectarian Propaganda

A1 Plus | 17:50:51 | 05-05-2004 | Politics |

ARMENIAN CHURCH’S CRACK-DOWN ON SECTARIAN PROPAGANDA

Armenian Apostolic Church’s Ararat Diocese authorities said Wednesday an
agreement is reached with Moscow and Nairi cinemas, according to which
before each show of the Passion of Christ movie the audience will be warned
that people outside the cinemas, who offer to discuss Christianity-related
issues are numbers of sects and have nothing in common with Armenian
Apostolic Church.