ANKARA: Aliyev condemns double standards in international politics

Azeri leader condemns double standards in international politics

Star website, Istanbul
4 Jul 05

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has spoken out against double
standards with regard to Turkey and Azerbaijan in international
politics. In an interview with the Turkish newspaper Star, Aliyev
described the world community’s position on the Nagornyy Karabakh
problem as hypocrisy, saying that international law works immediately
when some nations are concerned and remains silent when it comes to
Azerbaijan and Turkey. He said that Azerbaijan will never accept the
independence of Nagornyy Karabakh and has enough military power to put
an end to the occupation of its territory by Armenia. Speaking about
the forthcoming November parliamentary elections in Azerbaijan,
President Aliyev pledged to continue democratic reforms and ensure
free and fair elections. The following is the text of unattributed
report by Turkish newspaper Star website on 4 July headlined “Aliyev’s
ultimatum to Yerevan”. Subheadings as published:

Aliyev referred to the territory occupied by Armenia and said: “There
is no more time. We are losing our patience. They will either reach an
agreement and they will withdraw or our army will drive them away.”
Aliyev criticized the world countries for two things: They use double
standards regarding issues, to which Turkey is a side.

When I met Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev at the reception hall of
the Presidential Palace in Baku, it was possible to see that he had
come out of a tense meeting during which the country’s national
security problems had been discussed.

This 45-year-old statesman, who has been closely following world
politics since the day he inherited the presidency of the Azerbaijani
Republic from his father Heydar Aliyev who is described as “the
founding president,” began to feel comfortable only after my third
question.

As the interview continued I saw before me a cheerful president who
has made his homework properly, who has profound knowledge about the
developments that occur in the region, who is determined to maintain
the balances that were established by the late Heydar Aliyev, who is
very close to Turkey, and who has shaped his programme regarding the
future.

After this introduction I will merely enable Ilham Aliyev speak. Here
is the interview.

Oil is not everything

[Star] The honourable Aliyev, Azerbaijan waged a struggle for its
independence not so long ago – as a matter of fact, only 16 years
ago. And today Azerbaijan is seen as one of the most strategic
countries in the world. Many people believe that this success story
merely stems from the fact that Azerbaijan has oil. Do you believe
that oil is the only reason for Azerbaijan’s success?

[Aliyev] No. There is oil in many countries. If a country has oil,
this does not mean that it is a country of strategic importance. Our
strategic importance has increased due to our location and due to the
fact that we are consistently getting stronger. As our founder Heydar
Aliyev used to say, we live with Turkey as “one nation and two
states”. Our policies are based on this principle. Turkey and
Azerbaijan should resolve their economic problems and they should get
stronger together. This is very important and the world therefore
closely follows these efforts. With its 18-per-cent growth rate,
Azerbaijan is the fastest developing country in the world. The
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum natural gas
pipeline, and the Baku-Kars railway – there is no doubt that the
implementation of these projects is strengthening us in the
region. The region has reached a point, where no project can be
realized without the inclusion of Turkey and Azerbaijan. It is
impossible to do anything without the approval of Turkey and
Azerbaijan. This is our power.

Our army is very strong

[Star] I will use here the concept of fraternal partnership, rather
than strategic partnership because the latter is used in many
places. How will the fraternal partnership between Turkey and
Azerbaijan affect the Nagornyy Karabakh issue?

[Aliyev] Time is working in our favour in Nagornyy Karabakh that has
been occupied by Armenia primarily and is Azerbaijani territory. The
developments are auspicious for Azerbaijan. Compared with 11 years
ago, Azerbaijan has a stronger economy. It has established stability
at home. It is a developing country whose financial resources increase
every passing day. This is also reflected on our war power. With the
great support of the Turkish armed forces, Azerbaijan currently has
the strongest army in the South Caucasus. Our army is capable of
putting an end to the occupation of its territory single-handedly. We
are purchasing the necessary ammunition for our army every year and we
are making efforts to ensure that it gets stronger. Despite this,
however, Armenia’s economy has collapsed. It has imprisoned itself
within its own territory due to the policies that it has pursued. It
is a small and weak country that causes pain and suffering for its
people. It knows that it is no longer able to compete with Azerbaijan
in the economic or military fields. We currently continue to hold
talks with them because we believe that there is some hope. It should
be known, however, that there is a limit to the patience of the
Azerbaijani people.

[Star] In fact we are talking about a cease-fire that was announced 11
years ago. In other words, the conditions of war have not vanished. On
the contrary, the war still continues. If the Armenians sabotage the
efforts to find a solution, will Azerbaijan prefer to say the last
word in the war field?

[Aliyev] We are determined to make peaceful efforts in the
international community for putting an end to the occupation. We are
determined to make these efforts to the end because we have waged a
war and we know how much nations lose as a result of wars. This does
not mean, however, that we will remain spectators to the fact that
Azerbaijani territory is under occupation. International law is on our
side, but for one reason or another it is working very slowly against
us. Let me give you an example: You know about the problems related to
Abkhazia and Ossetia in Georgia. Both issues resemble the Karabakh
issue in terms of ethnic separatism. The world does not recognize
these separatist movements where Georgia is concerned and it is
displaying great sensitivity in order to ensure that the territorial
integrity of the Georgian state is maintained. And this is the right
thing to do. The world demands that we accept the illegal situation in
Karabakh and that we sacrifice our lands. Why? I can only assess this
as double standards.

[Star] Maybe, this is hypocrisy.

[Aliyev] Yes, hypocrisy. This is an unjust world. For one reason or
another, international justice works immediately where some nations
are concerned, and it remains silent where we are
concerned. Karabakh’s independence is unthinkable. We cannot give up
Azerbaijani territory. This is also unthinkable. We will not accept
this just because several dishonourable politicians from the Armenian
lobby suggest this. Currently we are strong enough to wage a war and
to put an end to this occupation. If the problem is not resolved
through peaceful means, we will not hesitate to use our military
power. The Armenians do not have a lot of time to reach a decision in
this regard. They will either reach an agreement and they will
withdraw, or our army will drive them away.

[Star] Turkey and Azerbaijan appear to share the same fate where the
hypocrisy displayed by the world is concerned. International law is
not applied where the Turks are concerned.

[Aliyev] You are quite right. Look at Turkey. Despite the fact that it
is right it is not able to explain the Cyprus issue to the world. This
does not mean that Turkey is unable to explain the issue. The other
side does not want to understand. Look at us. I am the one whose
territory has been occupied. The w orld comes to me and says that I
should respect the rights of the occupier and that I should accept
what it says. International law either does not work or works very
slowly where the Turks are concerned. This is nothing, but hypocrisy
towards the Turks.

Democracy will get stronger

[Star] In addition to all this, discussions on democracy are being
held in your country in the light of the elections to the National
Assembly that will be held on 4 November [actually 6
November]. Azerbaijan deepened its independence during the term of
your father Heydar Aliyev. Will it be able to deepen its democracy
during your term?

[Aliyev] We continue to make democratic reforms. Azerbaijan has been a
member of the Council of Europe for the past four year and we have
very close contacts with the EU. We are working together with Europe
for democratization. This is a very appropriate question. Azerbaijan
primarily focused on strengthening its independence. This process has
begun in 1996 and has reached these days. The late Heydar Aliyev
primarily established stability and he turned independence into real
independence. This and the ties that we established with Europe have
strengthened our independence. Currently it is time to strengthen
democracy. Let no-one be concerned. The 4 November elections will be
held before the eyes of the entire world and they will be
just. Everyone knows, however, that democracy does not work properly
in poor countries that have grave social problems. For a healthy
democracy there is a need for a strong economy that will obstruct
radicalism. This is what we are after. The more we strengthen
Azerbaijan’s economy and the more we resolve its social problems, the
more Azerbaijan’s democracy will get stronger.

[Star] Currently, however, you believe that the strengthening of
democracy does not constitute a threat to the stability in Azerbaijan.

[Aliyev] Of course. On the contrary, the development of Azerbaijan’s
democracy will lead to the improvement of the economy. Our people will
utilize their free investment means in this free environment. It is
therefore impossible to give up democracy. On the contrary, we aim to
develop democracy in all fields.

We sympathize with Tayyip Erdogan

[Star] As far as I understand you speak the same language with Prime
Minister Tayyip Erdogan, whom you have hosted recently.

[Aliyev] We are speaking the same language with Prime Minister Erdogan
in every field. We feel personal sympathy towards him and we have a
dialogue. We regularly hold consultations on the phone, even if we
cannot talk face to face. Every time I visit European countries, I am
pleased to see that Erdogan is praised in these countries and that he
is considered very charismatic by these countries. We have just
received the information notes of his last visit to the United States
and we can see that the visit to the United States was very successful
from all aspects. Prime Minister Erdogan and I are determined to exert
utmost efforts in order to strengthen the brotherhood between Turkey
and Azerbaijan and in order to ensure that the two countries become a
power centre in terms of the entire world.

Oil for Special Prices

[Star] At a time when the price of oil has exceeded 60 US dollars,
will you take action in order to alleviate the new loads loaded by the
increasing oil prices on the Turkish economy? In other words, will you
sell Turkey oil for cheap prices, honourable president?

[Aliyev] (Laughing) The oil and natural gas agreements that we have
signed with Turkey are based on very special prices. The international
oil prices are meaningless where relations between Turkey and
Azerbaijan are concerned. This was so when the price of oil stood at
eight US dollars and this is so when the price of oil is 60
dollars. Our brothers in Turkey should not be too concerned about the
oil prices.

NKR: Nagorno Karabakh Is a Conflict Party

NAGORNO KARABAKH IS A CONFLICT PARTY

Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
07 July 05

In the June 29 issue of the Russian newspaper Novoye Vremya the former
co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group Vladimir Kazimirov pointed out the
maintenance of the ceasefire and deterrence of military actions in the
present stage of regulation of the Karabakh conflict. Shall we expect
serious changes in the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh issue? asks
the Russian diplomat, commending Bakus proposal of direct
relationships with Nagorno Karabakh, says the newspaper. However,
according to Kazimirov, the dialogue between the two communities
proposed by Azerbaijan means avoiding direct talks. Nagorno Karabakh
is a conflict party, which is reflected in all the international
documents, arrangements of 1993-1994, mentions the former Minsk Group
co-chair, adding that neither the routes nor the oil pipeline
guarantee that military actions will not be resumed. What is the
possibility that military actions will be resumed, if we consider that
recently the Azerbaijani president has been making militaristic
statements quite often? Analysing the situation in the article Ilhams
Threats, Hayots Ashkhar Daily Newspaper (June 30) supposes that Alievs
militaristic statements are simply to ease the home political tensions
on the eve of the election in Azerbaijan and distracting the attention
of the society to a external factor; in this case the Karabakh
conflict. The newspaper predicts that before the elections the
Azerbaijani authorities will by all means set forward the idea of
existence of an external threat to corner the opposition which is
becoming increasingly strong. Aliev realizes that simply there is no
other way of overcoming the home political complications in the
upcoming autumn. It is necessary to set forward something new to throw
a monkey wrench in the works of the opposition. According to the
author of the article, this was the reason for the groundless
statements about the glorious victory in the competition of weaponry
with Armenia and consequently the Azerbaijani armys being the
strongest in the South Caucasus. Finally, writes the analyst of Hayots
Ashkhar, in order to control the home political life, hold the power
and distract public attention to external pressure in the upcoming
autumn the election slogan about the military and political dominance
of Azerbaijan may turn into a target, and a war slogan.

CHRISTINE MNATSAKANIAN.
07-07-2005

Cease-fire not violated

A1plus

| 17:51:27 | 05-07-2005 | Politics |

CEASE-FIRE NOT VIOLATED

Today the OSCE Mission held a recurrent monitoring was held at the contact
line of the Karabakh and Azeri armed forces to the southwest of Karmiravan
settlement of Mardakert region of NKR.

Miroslav Vimetal and Peter Key, tield assistants of the Personal
Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office conducted the monitoring from
the Karabakh party. The Azeri side did not lead the monitoring group to the
contact line.

No violations of cease-fire were fixed.

Economic growth in Armenia Jan-May 2005 exceeds CIS countries’ avg.

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
July 5 2005

ECONOMIC GROWTH IN ARMENIA IN JAN-MAY 2005 EXCEEDS CIS COUNTRIES’
AVERAGE INDEX BY 3.5%

YEREVAN, July 5. /ARKA/. Economic growth in Armenia made 8.5% in
Jan-May 2005, compared with the same period a year earlier, exceeding
the CIS countries’ average index by 3.5%, the CIS Statistical
Committee says. The average economic growth in the CIS member
countries made 5%. Armenia ranked third following Azerbaijan with its
16% GDP and Belarus with 8.9%. Economic growth in Tajikistan is 7.5-%
economic growth, in Russia 4.8% (production in economy’s basic
sectors), Ukraine 4.7% and Kyrgyzstan 3.3%. There are no data on
Georgia, Kazakhstan and Moldova for that period. GDP in mentioned
countries rose for the 1st quarter by 7.34%, 9.14% and 8.24%
accordingly. M.V. -0–

Lennmarker: Golden opportunity for peaceful settlement of Karabakh

Pan Armenian News

LENNMARKER: «GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY FOR PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT OF KARABAKH ISSUE
AVAILABLE»

05.07.2005 02:44

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Today there is a «golden opportunity» for peaceful
settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh issue based on the win-win outcome, when
Armenia and Azerbaijan will take least losses. The parties should intensify
the talks over the issue. OSCE Parliamentary Assembly (PA) special
representative for the Nagorno Karabakh conflict Goran Lennmarker made a
statement on this at the PA annual session held in Washington. As reported
by OSCE PA press counsellor Jan Jooren, Lennmarker presented his report over
the issue to the delegation heads. The document reflected the rapporteur’s
ideas over securing a peace resolution of the conflict under the aegis of
the OSCE Minsk Group. In his speech Lennmarker underscored, «the Karabakh
conflict is not frozen. Many people annually die at the contact line between
the parties.» He also remarked, «there is virtually no alternative to the
peaceful resolution. It is absolutely necessary to solve the conflict and
put an end to the personal economic, social problems of both parties.» The
Swedish MP proposed not to base on the respective European experience, when
«democracy and integration form the foundation for securing final peace.»
«Powerful European and international institutions are ready to assist
Armenia and Azerbaijan at any moment. It is a generous offer and it should
be useful,» he emphasized. Lennmarker also noted the activities of the
Armenian and Azeri parliamentary delegations were very helpful. «Once a
peace agreement has been finalized by the two Governments, the parliamentary
dimension becomes invaluable in informing the public and in ensuring the
implementation.» It should be noted that Goran Lennmarker was appointed to
the office of the OSCE PA special representative for Nagorno Karabakh in
June 2002 and has visited Armenia and Azerbaijan several times since then.
He has also held meetings with representatives of various public sectors of
the parties, including refugees, the Yerkir newspaper reported.

BAKU: KLO protests Armenian presence at Baku-hosted seminar

Azeri pressure group protests Armenian presence at Baku-hosted seminar

ANS TV, Baku
4 Jul 05

The Karabakh Liberation Organization has issued a statement in protest
against the participation of Armenians at a seminar [on the
displacement of population in the South-Caucasus] of the Committee on
Migration, Refugees and Population [Sub-Committee on Refugees] of the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe held in Baku.

The KLO said in its statement that Armenia’s participation in the
Baku-hosted seminar was against Azerbaijan’s interests. The KLO
demands that Armenian representatives be immediately banished from
Baku.

The organization said they would do this themselves if their demand
was ignored.

BAKU: Police Force Sadakhly Villagers Unblock Georgia-Armenia Road

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
July 1 2005

SPECIAL POLICE UNITS FORCE SADAKHLY VILLAGE RESIDENTS UNBLOCK
GEORGIA-ARMENIA ROAD
[July 01, 2005, 20:48:23]

Over 400 residents of Sadakhly village in Marneuli region of Georgia
blocked, June 29, central road connecting Georgia and Armenia to
express dissatisfaction with recent disappearance of their
fellow-villager Sadreddin Palangov, but were driven away later by
Georgian special police units.

The protesters then gathered in front of the police station as they
linked the incident with its chief Goja Shubitidze who had a row with
Palangov two months ago for the latter’s criticizing the local police
for horrendous corruption and criminogenic situation in the region.

Reportedly, search actions have not yet yielded results. Special
police units left Sadakhly village on June 30. Georgian
law-enforcement bodies have launched an investigation into the case.

Soccer: Armenian to Terek’s aid

Special Broadcasting Service, Australia
July 2 2005

Armenian to Terek’s aid
PA Sport

Terek Grozny have boosted their fight against relegation by signing
Armenian midfielder Romik Khachatryan from Panathinaikos.

The 26-year-old international has also played for Olympiakos and may
be available as soon as this weekend for Terek, who have won just
twice in the league this season and lie joint-bottom with Rostov.

“Today we’re waiting for the Khachatryan transfer documents from the
Greek club,” read a statement on Terek’s website.

“If we’re on time to include him in our squad then he may play
against Lokomotiv Moscow on Sunday.”

“Armenian Time Trouble” at PACE

“ARMENIAN TIME TROUBLE” AT PACE

YEREVAN, JUNE 23. ARMINFO. Today PACE is to hold special debates on
the constitutional reform process in Armenia while the ad hoc
committee on Nagorno Karabakh is to have its first meeting and Venice
Commission experts to meet with the Armenian delegates to the CE.

The co-rapporteurs of PACE monitoring committee Georges Colombier and
Jerzy Jaskiernia and the co-rapporteur of the PACE committee on legal
affairs and human rights Erik Jurgens will attend the debates.

A CE source reports that the debated document contains an urge to the
Armenian authoriites to fully comply with the Venice Commission’s
recommendations and to organize second parliamentary reading of the
issue by Aug at latest. Besides the document urges the Armenian
authorities to take urgent measures to establish a political dialogue
with the opposition and to hold a constitutional reform referendum in
Nov at latest.

The ad hoc committee was set up in the structure of the PACE Bureau
and comprises 19 representatives of the countries interested in the
Nagorno Karabakh conflict resolution.

The source says that the meeting of the Venice Commissioners with the
Armenian delegates to PACE may be continued on Friday.

Scholar’s arrest fuels diplomatic dispute

Chicago Tribune, IL
June 22 2005

Scholar’s arrest fuels diplomatic dispute
Turkish man is held on Armenian charges

By Catherine Collins
Special to the Tribune
Published June 22, 2005

ISTANBUL — The arrest of a Duke University doctoral student last
week on charges of trying to smuggle rare books out of Armenia has
stirred concerns among academics and officials and illustrates the
quagmire of Turkish-Armenian relations.

The student, Yektan Turkyilmaz, was the first Turkish citizen ever
given access to the Armenian national archives. He had just concluded
his fourth research trip there Friday when he was arrested before
boarding a plane at the airport in Yerevan, the Armenian capital.

Armen Yeganian of the Armenian Embassy in Washington described the
case as a customs violation and said Turkyilmaz had several books
dating back as far as the 17th Century. But Turkyilmaz’s family and
academic associates said a researcher of his caliber never would try
to steal priceless books.

Because Turkey and Armenia do not have diplomatic relations,
Turkyilmaz initially landed in a diplomatic no-man’s land. University
officials and the U.S. and Turkish governments have taken up his
cause, and Turkey on Tuesday officially requested Turkyilmaz’s
release.

“I believe this case is fundamentally about academic freedom,” said
his academic adviser, Orin Starn, a cultural anthropology professor
at Duke University.

Starn described Turkyilmaz, 33, as “a brilliant and widely respected
young scholar” who has received numerous fellowships to support his
research into nationalism among Turks, Armenians and Kurds in the
dying days of the Ottoman Empire.

His family has not been able to contact Turkyilmaz, though they have
spoken with his friends in Armenia, some of whom were detained and
interrogated, said his sister, Zeynep.

Turkyilmaz’s case is the latest episode in a long-running diplomatic
dispute about what happened to hundreds of thousands of Armenians in
Turkey between 1915 and 1922.

Armenians say that Turkey’s mass deportation of Armenians during
World War I was part of an organized genocide that killed 1.5 million
people. Turkey denies there was any systematic attempt to kill
Armenians.

The Turkish State Archive recently issued a list of more than 523,000
Turks it says were killed by Armenians the same years.

Regardless, it is a dark chapter in Turkish history that until
recently has been discussed rarely and left out of Turkish textbooks
while landing many scholars, journalists and activists in jail.

Turkey’s best-known novelist, Orhan Pamuk, shattered a taboo earlier
this year when he said that 1 million Armenians were murdered in his
country. Days of screaming headlines, death threats and several
lawsuits charging him with insulting the Turkish state followed his
statement.

Turkey has for years engaged in diplomatic scuffles with any country
it suspects of taking the Armenian side. This spring, the Turkish
parliament demanded apologies from the legislatures of the 12
countries that have recognized Armenian claims of genocide.

Gradually, however, partly as a result of efforts to join the
European Union, a door on the past has been opened.

Although Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul insists that the
genocide label is “pure slander,” Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
has called on all countries to open archives to scholars to determine
once and for all what has happened.

A spokesman at the Turkish Foreign Ministry said he is baffled by the
arrest.

“This is a very strange situation,” the official said, speaking on
condition of anonymity. “From what we know of Turkyilmaz’s research,
it seems he was more sympathetic to the Armenian view than the
Turkish.”