Armenian genocide: How Valley prosecutor missed his chance to be ‘immortal symbol of justice’

The Fresno Bee

Attorney James Lindsay, defendant Gourgen Yanikian, District Attorney David Minier, attorney Vasken Minasian in 1972. Contributed
Valley Voices

Armenian genocide: How Valley prosecutor missed his chance to be ‘immortal symbol of justice’

By David Minier
January 26, 2018 01:22 PM

Twice each year, my thoughts turn to the Armenian Genocide. On April 24, the anniversary date of the 1915 massacres orchestrated by the Turkish government. And  on Jan. 27, when 45 years ago Gourgen Yanikian assassinated two Turkish diplomats in Santa Barbara to avenge the genocide.

Yanikian, age 78 and a former Fresno resident, was charged with murder, and I was his prosecutor.

The aging Armenian had lured the diplomats to a cottage at Santa Barbara’s exclusive Biltmore Hotel, promising gifts of art treasures for their government. Instead, he pulled a Luger pistol from a hollowed out book and emptied it at them. He then called the reception desk, announced he had killed “two evils,” and sat calmly on the patio awaiting arrest.

Yanikian’s purpose was to create an “Armenian Nuremberg” – a show trial to call world attention to the genocide, as the Nuremberg trial had done with Nazi war crimes. And perhaps to be acquitted. Yanikian’s hope was not unreasonable.

In 1921, a German jury had acquitted Soghoman Tehlirian of murdering Talaat Pasha, the Turkish official most responsible for the genocide. Tehlirian later settled in Fresno, and his tomb is the centerpiece of Fresno’s Masis Ararat Cemetery.

Talaat had been sentenced in absentia to death for “crimes against humanity,” and had fled to Germany. Tehlirian found Talaat and shot him to death on a Berlin street. As planned, Tehlirian pled not guilty, and his trial was reported worldwide.

‘They Simply Had to Let Him Go’

Tehlirian testified about the rape and murder of his sisters, the beheading of his mother, and the killings of his brothers. It took a jury less than two hours to find Tehlirian not guilty. The New York Times headline read, “They Simply Had To Let Him Go.”

Fifty-two years later, in a Santa Barbara courtroom, Yanikian sought his “Armenian Nuremberg,” and an acquittal. As prosecutor, it was my duty to convict him.

The trial proceeded without personal rancor. I have a photograph of Yanikian, his attorneys and me, standing together, smiling, during a court recess. And another, with the inscription “to our admired and respected District Attorney and friend.”

Yanikian’s attorneys told the judge they wanted to call as witnesses eminent historians and elderly Armenians who had survived the genocide. And survivors were available. Bused daily from Southern California, they sat silently in the courtroom among family members, ready to recount unspeakable horrors.

One of Yanikian’s attorneys, Vasken Minasian, asked me to allow the testimony. He gave me a copy of “The Cross and the Crescent,” about the Tehlirian trial. In it he wrote: “The tragedy in Santa Barbara has brought destiny and God to your doorstep,” and he urged me to “bring forth an indictment against genocide.” He added, “You stand to become an immortal symbol of justice around the world.”

This was heady stuff, and I faced a dilemma: to allow a parade of eye-witnesses to the genocide, risking an acquittal, or to block the evidence to obtain a conviction. I knew such evidence would likely lead to “jury nullification,” where a jury disregards the law and acquits for a perceived greater justice, as the Tehlirian jury had done.

I took the safer path, and the judge sustained my objection to the witnesses. But I could not in good conscience block the testimony of Yanikian himself, no matter how it inflamed the jury. He commanded the witness stand for six days and described in detail, without objection, the Armenian genocide.

Turks slaughter 27 family members

Yanikian told how, as a boy of 8, he watched marauding Turks slit his brother’s throat, and of the slaughter of 26 other family members. He testified in Armenian, translated by Aram Saroyan, former Fresno grape shipper, San Francisco attorney, and uncle of author William Saroyan.

Jurors were moved to tears by Yanikian’s testimony, but they were denied the corroborating testimony the defense hoped would sway their decision. The Yanikian jury, unlike the Tehlirian jury, followed the law and gave me what I asked: two first-degree murder verdicts. There would be no nullification. Yanikian was sentenced to life in prison. He was granted compassionate release to a care home in 1984, over objection of the Turkish government, and died of cancer two months later.

Yanikian failed to get his Armenian Nuremberg, and “The Forgotten Genocide,” denied to this day by the Turkish government, was never proved in a court of law by the testimony of eyewitness survivors.

Looking back, I regret I hadn’t the courage to allow such evidence, and trust the jury to follow the law. And attorney Minasian’s words still haunt me: “… bring forth an indictment against genocide.” History’s darkest chapters – its genocides – should be fully exposed, so their horrors are less likely to be repeated.

Notwithstanding Turkish denials, the historical evidence of the Armenian genocide is so abundant that 48 American states, and at least 25 nations, have memorialized and condemned it.

Valadao pushes resolution on genocide

Not so the American government. For years, Congressional Resolutions condemning the genocide have been defeated after intense pressure from Turkey, where American  military bases exist at Turkish pleasure.

Passage of the current version, House Resolution 220, “would be a critical step towards ensuring an event like the Armenian genocide never takes place again,” says Hanford Congressman David Valadao, a co-sponsor.

But H.R. 220 has languished in the Foreign Affairs Committee for 10 months, and chances for passage are remote. The House will doubtless take the safer path, as I did in the Yanikian trial.

And once again, truth will fall victim to expedience.

David Minier of Fresno is a former district attorney of both Madera and Santa Barbara counties, and a retired Superior Court judge who sits frequently by assignment in Valley courtrooms.

Belarus and Kazakhstan are also helping Azerbaijan to arm

Aravot, Armenia
Jan 24 2018
Belarus and Kazakhstan are also helping Azerbaijan to arm: Comments by Gevorg Melikyan
[Armenian News note: the below was translated from the Russian edition of Aravot]
Relations between Azerbaijan and Belarus have been developing since 2002. Azerbaijan has purchased weapons worth 0.5bn dollars from Belarus over the past decade, Gevorg Melikyan, the associate expert of the Armenian Institute of International and Security Affairs (AIISA), quoted the data at yesterday's [23 January] discussions of "Security dynamic in Armenia's neighbourhood" held in this organisation.

The expert expressed surprise that the Armenian media touched on this issue only at the end of 2017, saying that Azerbaijan transferred 170m dollars for Belarusian Polonez [multiple-launch rocket systems]. The expert is worried about the lack of discussions of the issue in the Armenian press, because he believes that it is a very serious military equipment, which is essentially an answer to the [Russian] Iskander [missile systems] delivered to Armenia.

Moreover, Gevorg Melikyan warned that Azerbaijan and Belarus were creating a joint enterprise in Gandzak ([Azerbaijan's] Ganca – editor's remark). They will produce military tractors. It is clear that Yerevan has already raised the issue on a number of occasions, but he [Melikyan] is somewhat concerned that [Karabakh capital] Stepanakert [Xankandi] is keeping silence. In the meantime, he thinks that it is a good occasion to show that it is an independent entity. "Stepanakert has taken aim at Ukraine, whose cooperation with Azerbaijan is weak compared to Belarus or hosts delegations from [Georgia's breakaway] Abkhazia and South Ossetia and enthusiastically welcomes the referendum in Iraqi Kurdistan," he noted.

The speaker also warned that another country, Kazakhstan, that is, [like Armenia], a member of the [Russian-led] EEU [Eurasian Economic Union], is also rendering military assistance to Azerbaijan. Military cooperation between Pakistan, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan is being shaped at the moment and they intend to produce ballistic missiles. In other words, Kazakhstan is also heling Azerbaijan to arm.

In the meantime, Yerevan urges us to tell fairy tales about the breakdown of Azerbaijan. Instead of trusting them [the fairy tales], it is necessary to watch the steps that do not speak well for us: "Azerbaijan is several steps ahead of us".

Number of CoE Conventions signed in Strasbourg

On January 24, RA Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and Secretary General of the Council of Europe Thorbjørn Jagland signed a number of CoE Conventions in Strasbourg. In the presence of Serzh Sargsyan, Foreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandian signed today five CoE documents at the Council of Europe, namely the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings, Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism, Convention on Cinematographic Co-Production and the CoE Convention on an Integrated Safety, Security and Service Approach at Football Matches and Other Sports Events.

Armenians among world’s top backgammon players in 2017

News.am, Armenia
Jan 12 2018
Armenians among world’s top backgammon players in 2017 Armenians among world’s top backgammon players in 2017

13:40, 12.01.2018
                  

The year 2017 was successful, especially for Armenian professional backgammon players.

In particular, the national backgammon team of Armenia became the winner in the final of world’s best backgammon teams’ tournament, the Worldwide Team Challenge, which was held in Georgia within the framework of the Backgammon World Championship. In addition, Tsaruk Manukyan (Armenia) won the Grand Prix at this event.

Separately, Muscovite Armenian Mikayel Vardanyan became bronze medalist in speed gammon at the annual Backgammon World Championship, which is held in Monte Carlo.

Armenians were among the best also at the tournaments of the Russian Sport Backgammon Federation. 

In addition, Russian Armenian football journalist Artur Petrosyan became the winner of the speed gammon competition at the annual International MERIT Open Backgammon Championship, which is held in Cyprus.

Armenak Alajajian Basket Player, Coach, 86: Star Athlete was unknown in Canada

The Globe and Mail (Canada)
January 1, 2018 Monday
 
 
ARMENAK ALAJAJIAN BASKETBALL PLAYER, COACH, 86: STAR ATHLETE WAS UNKNOWN IN CANADA
 
Ethnic Armenian immigrated to Toronto and first worked in a parking lot, but was honoured in the former Soviet Union and Armenia
 
TOM HAWTHORN, Special to The Globe and Mail
 
 
While playing for the Soviet Union in the gold-medal basketball game at the 1964 Olympics, point guard Armenak Alajajian contested a loose ball, only to have a much larger American land on his back. At just that instant, a photographer caught the Soviet player being bowled over.
 
That image graced the sports pages of dozens, if not hundreds, of newspapers in North America, preserving a memorable if inelegant play involving one of the era's best players.
 
The Americans won the gold medal in the match, while Mr. Alajajian and his teammates settled for silver. For a decade, the ethnic Armenian point guard was a standout athlete for two of the better basketball teams in the world – the Soviet Union national team and CSKA, the Red Army team based in Moscow. A brooding, beetle-browed figure of intensity on the basketball court, Mr. Alajajian's great playmaking, including daring, no-look, behind-the-back passes at the Olympics, demonstrated less a flair for showmanship than a calculated deception to get a teammate in the open for a clear shot.
 
After winning European championships as both an athlete and a coach, Mr. Alajajian followed family members by immigrating to Canada, where he could only find work in Toronto as a parking-lot attendant. He was given entrée to the diamond and jewellery business after a fellow Armenian was startled to recognize so famous an athlete in so humble a position. At 44, he also became basketball coach of the Hawks at Humber College, where he registered in an English program to better communicate with his players.
 
Mr. Alajajian, who died at 86, played and coached amateur basketball in Toronto for two decades. The diamond merchant was known in the Armenian-Canadian community for his philanthropy. He was inducted into the Armenian General Benevolent Union Sports Hall of Fame in Toronto last year.
 
While his athletic prowess was little known in his adopted land, where he became a citizen, the athlete was honoured both in the former Soviet Union, where a high school in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, bears his name, and in the independent nation of Armenia, a former Soviet republic, where a postage stamp containing his likeness dribbling a ball was issued to commemorate the 2000 Olympics.
 
Mr. Alajajian was born on Dec. 25, 1930, at Alexandria, Egypt, where his family settled in the aftermath of the Armenian genocide. According to a niece, his mother had been found by the Red Cross wandering the Anatolian countryside and was sent to an orphanage in Greece.
 
In high school, Mr. Alajajian played tennis, table tennis, soccer and racquetball, while also competing in track and field, though it was on the basketball court where he showed the greatest promise.
 
After the Second World War, his family heeded a call for repatriation, a movement known as nergaght, a "gathering in" of diaspora Armenians to a homeland, even if it was ruled by the Soviets and not the one from which they had fled. Later, disillusion would set in and many left again for foreign lands.
 
As a teenager in 1948, he enrolled at Yerevan State University in the Armenian capital, becoming captain of the basketball team. After graduation in 1951, he qualified for the club team SKIF Yerevan, which won the Soviet championship in Odessa that year thanks to his 43 points against Kiev.
 
After two seasons with Burevestnik Almaty in Kazakhstan, the point guard joined the Soviet Red Army, playing for its CSKA (Central Sports Club of the Army) team in Moscow. His determined play earned him a spot on the roster of the Soviet national team for nine seasons.
 
His club team won nine Soviet championships during his stint, while also winning four European championships. He wore No. 6 and was known as Alachachian, or Alachachyan, or Alatchatchan from the transliteration of his name from Russian.
 
Mr. Alajajian made his Olympic debut at Tokyo in 1964, scoring five points against Canada in a preliminary game. In the final against the United States, he sank three of eight shots, many of those coming from a distance in an era before the threepoint shot. The United States maintained an undefeated record in Olympic play by prevailing over the Soviets, 73-59, in a chippy, physical game typical of such Cold War showdowns.
 
Afterwards, Mr. Alajajian, who spoke some English, told reporters the American victory was deserved, as they had "played a better game, with better rebounding, better shooting."
 
"We played good, very good, for the first eight minutes," he said. "But the Americans played good for 40 minutes. If we play bad for three or four minutes, that's all they need. They rebound well, they come up with the ball and get to take lots of shots."
 
The point guard acknowledged the physical play in the final. "Basketball is not tennis," he shrugged.
 
The Soviet Union recognized the Olympic silver medals by naming him and his teammates to the Orden znak pocheta (Order of the Badge of Honour).
 
Mr. Alajajian's stellar play, not to mention his command of English, at least as compared with the rest of the Soviet entourage, provided an opportunity for him to travel the world for exhibitions and competitions. He even got to tour the 1965 World's Fair in New York.
 
After retiring as a player in 1967, he became coach of CSKA, a position he would hold for five years, winning three Soviet titles, as well as the Cup of Europe twice. His coaching record with CSKA was an impressive 130-40.
 
A student of the game, Mr. Alajajian wrote basketball features for the newspaper Sovetskii Sport and the magazine Sportivnye igry (Sporting Games). He also wrote two books – a memoir, Notes of a Basketball Player (1965), and a coaching treatise, Not Only About Basketball (1970).
 
In Toronto, he served as head coach of the senior Armenian General Benevolent Union team. The group also benefited from his charitable giving, as did the Holy Trinity Armenian Church, where his funeral service ultimately was held.
 
Mr. Alajajian died at Scarborough General Hospital in Toronto on Dec. 4 from complications after breaking his hip in a fall. He leaves behind his son, Arthur Alajajian; daughter, Karina Alajajian; four grandchildren; and sisters, Rose Whitehorn and France Kandaharian. He was divorced.
 
The American player who landed on Mr. Alajajian's back at the 1964 Olympics was Lucious (Luke) Brown Jackson, a 6-foot-9 power forward, who stood 14 inches taller and weighed 40 pounds more than the point guard he crushed. Mr. Jackson later played professionally in the National Basketball Association, winning a championship with Wilt Chamberlain and the Philadelphia 76ers in 1967.
 
Despite the passage of more than a half-century, Mr. Jackson, now 76, remembered his opponent.
 
"He and I were going for a rebound, or a loose ball. It was a battle," he said when reached recently at his home in Beaumont, Tex. He recalled Mr. Alajajian as a pesky rival. "He was a good player. He could shoot the ball."
 
The accolade did not quite match the greatest praise the athlete ever received, which came courtesy of cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin, the first man in space, who once said of the speedy guard: "He blasts like a rocket!"
 
 

Armenian analyst: Polarization of Turkish society still continues

News.am, Armenia
Dec 31 2017
Armenian analyst: Polarization of Turkish society still continues Armenian analyst: Polarization of Turkish society still continues

15:05, 31.12.2017
                  

YEREVAN. – A number of important events took place in Turkey last year, from which it’s worthy to mention the referendum on constitutional changes in April and persecutions against the Gulen supporters, political analyst Vahram Ter-Matevosyan told Armenian News-NEWS.am.

He believes the opposition in Turkey remains paralyzed.

“Though Erdogan succeeded in reaching his goal, and a part of society voted for the proposed constitutional amendments, still it was clear that it could hardly be called a victory. The slight difference between the for and against votes, the open dissatisfaction of a large part of society and the fraud that Erdogan and his team made in the election campaign showed that the split and polarization of the Turkish society continues”, the expert said.

He noted that during the months following the referendum, Erdogan’s step by step authoritarian manifestations became more obvious.

“As a result, the mechanisms of mutual counterweight between different branches of authority in Turkey became more formal, almost completely accommodated to Erdogan's will. Opposition continues to be paralyzed. The two co-chairs, nine deputies and 80 mayors of the Pro-Kurdish Democratic Party, continue to be in prison, and the propositions of the largest oppositional Republican People's Party do not go beyond speeches and marches. The new opposition force formed in the past year, the Good party, although started its path quite promising, but still, didn’t come out with any memorable steps”, Ter-Matevosyan said.

He noted that the next issue of domestic political processes in Turkey was extension of the emergency regime and its endless series of trials, imprisonments, detentions, arrests and dismissals.

“Since July 2016, a total of 148,000 government officials, teachers, professors, civil servants and scientists have been dismissed based on a series of government decisions concerning the ongoing struggle against the Gulen supporters, the Kurdish Workers' Party, and the Islamic State. About 3,000 schools, dormitories and universities have been closed, and about 6,000 scholars and researchers have been dismissed. 187 media agencies were closed in 18 months and 308 journalists were arrested. It's no coincidence that as in previous years, Turkey continues to be the largest prisoner of journalists.”

“This resulted in an atmosphere of fear and mutual suspicion. Journalists, analysts and researchers living in Turkey, who somehow expressed their position on important domestic political issues a few years ago, avoided voicing criticism against the government over the past 2-3 years”.

Arménie : Quand Bruxelles et Moscou tirent les leçons du Maïdan

Le Courrier de Russie
29 déc. 2017
Arménie : Quand Bruxelles et Moscou tirent les leçons du Maïdan
Guevorg Mirzayan | 29 décembre 2017

Le 24 novembre dernier, l’Union européenne (UE) signait avec Erevan un accord de partenariat complet et renforcé. Pour Guevorg Mirzayan, chercheur en sciences politiques et contributeur de la revue Expert, cet accord, à la différence de ceux conclus auparavant avec la Géorgie et l’Ukraine, prend en compte les intérêts stratégiques de la Russie.

En quoi cet accord est-il si crucial ? Avec lui, l’UE court plusieurs lièvres à la fois. Et la plupart de ces lièvres ne sont pas arméniens, mais russes.
En incorporant davantage l’Arménie à son Partenariat oriental, Bruxelles voulait prouver à tous les sceptiques que (…) l’intégration européenne pouvait encore être attractive, même pour des pays impliqués dans des processus d’intégration alternatifs tel que l’Union eurasiatique. Cet objectif a été atteint. Lors de la signature, les responsables arméniens ont fait un éloge appuyé de l’Europe et de son projet : « Ce document est une base juridique solide pour le renforcement du dialogue politique et l’élargissement de la coopération économique, a ainsi déclaré le ministre arménien des Affaires étrangères, Édouard Nalbandian. Le diplomate souhaite par ailleurs un approfondissement des relations avec l’UE dans tous les domaines. »

Avant une réunion du conseil suprême de l’Union eurasiatique, constitué des 5 présidents des pays membres. Crédits : kremlin.ru

Mais Bruxelles n’était pas venue chercher que des compliments. Par cet accord, l’UE marque aussi son soutien à ses partisans à l’intérieur de l’Arménie. Il n’est un secret pour personne que l’Europe souhaite depuis longtemps arracher Erevan aux griffes de la Russie et priver cette dernière de son dernier allié dans le Caucase du Sud. Les conditions actuelles sont idéales pour y parvenir, les relations russo-arméniennes n’étant pas au beau fixe. Et, pour le bonheur de l’UE, cette brouille n’est pas de circonstance, mais liée au refus d’une partie de la société arménienne d’accepter les réalités de l’alliance avec la Russie.
Si, d’un point de vue juridique, les relations entre la Russie et l’Arménie s’établissent sur un pied d’égalité, elles ne le seront jamais sur le plan politique. Tout simplement parce que les deux pays et leurs dirigeants n’ont absolument pas le même poids, la même dimension. Par ailleurs, une partie des Arméniens – encouragés par des activistes trop avides de financements européens – ne comprennent sincèrement pas comment la Russie, leur alliée stratégique, peut encore entretenir des relations avec l’Azerbaïdjan, leur ennemi juré.

Dmitry Medvedev pendant une visite officielle en Azerbaïdjan, avec le président Ilham Aliyev. Crédits : kremlin.ru

Ils ne comprennent pas non plus comment Moscou peut continuer à vendre à Bakou des armes qui, à leurs yeux, ne serviront qu’à tuer des petits gars arméniens. Ce que ces gens oublient toutefois, c’est qu’il n’existe aucun embargo sur les ventes d’armes à l’Azerbaïdjan. Le fait que Bakou achète des armes russes – plutôt que turques [autre ennemi juré] – réduit en réalité, de façon significative, le risque de reprise d’une guerre ouverte entre les deux pays. Une guerre qui tuerait incomparablement plus de petits gars arméniens. Mais c’est bien connu : le cœur a ses raisons…
Ce nouvel accord de partenariat renforcé vise donc à consolider la position des arméniens pro-européens, mais aussi à donner à la population arménienne dans son ensemble l’espoir que l’UE parviendra – elle au moins – à changer les choses. Concrètement, il oblige Erevan à mener les réformes systémiques nécessaires et à transformer ce qui est aujourd’hui une oligarchie en un pays au développement démocratique normal.
L’opposition arménienne (notamment celle qui appelle à sortir de l’intégration eurasiatique) promet d’ailleurs de veiller attentivement à ce que le pouvoir respecte ses obligations contractées dans le cadre de l’accord, et en particulier, la conduite d’une réforme du système judiciaire.

Les ambitions européennes de l’Arménie ne réjouissent évidemment pas la Russie. Mais le Kremlin sait que la signature de cet accord – à la différence de ce qui s’est passé en Ukraine – n’entraînera ni une réorientation de la politique étrangère arménienne ni l’engagement d’Erevan dans le camp européen antirusse. L’Arménie ne peut tout simplement pas se permettre une telle lubie. L’Europe n’est pas en mesure de garantir sa sécurité face aux États turciques voisins [Azerbaïdjan et Turquie], alors que la Russie en est capable. À vrai dire, elle seule le peut, et elle le fait, autant sur le plan militaire, par le biais de ses bases implantées en Arménie, que sur le plan politique, en faisant comprendre à l’Azerbaïdjan les conséquences potentielles d’une reprise de la guerre.
C’est ce qui explique qu’Erevan, de son côté, fasse tout son possible pour que l’accord avec l’UE ne nuise ni aux intérêts de la Russie ni à ceux de l’Union eurasiatique. Par exemple, à la différence du projet d’accord soumis par Bruxelles à l’Arménie en 2013, le document signé en novembre ne contient aucune allusion à une Zone de libre-échange avec l’UE.
Par cet accord, l’Arménie veut simplement diversifier ses relations politiques à l’étranger et les développer selon le principe du « et-et » plutôt que du « ou-ou ». Erevan veut être en mesure de développer des relations fortes avec l’Europe et son marché (qui, au premier semestre 2017, représentait un tiers de ses exportations et environ la moitié de ses importations) tout en préservant son alliance stratégique avec Moscou. Un scénario qui n’a rien de terrible ni de séditieux, et qui ne présente, au contraire, que des avantages et des opportunités.
L’avantage le plus évident est la possibilité de laisser croire aux quelques fières têtes brûlées arméniennes que leur pays est libre de choisir ses partenaires politiques étrangers. Les Arméniens se sentiront moins déshonorés et offenses.

Azerbaijani press: Rapprochement of Russia, Iran, Turkey can contribute to resolve Karabakh conflict – Russian political scientist

23 December 2017 / 15:15
  • A
  • A+
  • A-

"The Armenian-AzerbaijaniNagorno-Karabakh conflict can not be settled without the political leaders of the region – Russia, Iran and Turkey. Their rapprochement can contribute to resolve theNagorno-Karabakh conflict,” said Russian journalist and political scientist Maxim Shevchenko.

 
He made remarks at the international symposium titled “The future of the region: Geopolitical challenges and perspectives” held in Baku on Dec.23, APA reports.

 

Shevchenko noted that the world is ready for serious changes and is tired of the unresolved conflict.

 

“The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict arose in order to create other foci of conflict in the future. When they say that Russia in the 90s of the last century held an erroneous position on Karabakh conflict, it offends me. At that time, Russia and the Yeltsin-Gaidar regime was ruled from Washington,” he said.

 

The political scientist also reminded that wealthy Armenian businessmen have direct access to the US president.

 

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict entered its modern phase when the Armenian SRR made territorial claims against the Azerbaijani SSR in 1988.

 

A fierce war broke out between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan. As a result of the war, Armenian armed forces occupied some 20 percent of Azerbaijani territory which includes Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent districts (Lachin, Kalbajar, Aghdam, Fuzuli, Jabrayil, Gubadli and Zangilan), and over a million Azerbaijanis became refugees and internally displaced people.

 

The military operations finally came to an end when Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in Bishkek in 1994.

 

Dealing with the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is the OSCEMinsk Group, which was created after the meeting of the CSCE (OSCE after the Budapest summit held in Dec.1994) Ministerial Council in Helsinki on 24 March 1992. The Group’s members include Azerbaijan, Armenia, Russia, the United States, France, Italy, Germany, Turkey, Belarus, Finland and Sweden.

 

Besides, the OSCE Minsk Group has a co-chairmanship institution, comprised of Russian, the US and French co-chairs, which began operating in 1996.  

 

Resolutions 822, 853, 874 and 884 of the UN Security Council, which were passed in short intervals in 1993, and other resolutions adopted by the UN General Assembly, PACE, OSCE, OIC, and other organizations require Armenia to unconditionally withdraw its troops from Nagorno-Karabakh.

 

 

 

Farid Mirzayev

Expert: Energy component of the Armenia-EU agreement conceals big threats for Armenia

ARMINFO News Agency, Armenia
 Saturday


Expert: Energy component of the Armenia-EU agreement conceals big
threats for Armenia

Yerevan December 23

Tatevik Shagunyan. Over the past almost 30 years, Armenia and the
whole region are in a state of rupture between two major integration
projects - conditionally integration along the West-East axis (or the
"Western Project") and the North-South axis (the "Eurasian Project").
Such an opinion at the conferences "Three years of the Unified Energy
System: achievements and prospects" within the framework of the annual
meeting of the Eurasian Expert Club, the leading analyst of Noravank,
the national expert of the UN on energy Ara Marajyan expressed.

According to him, it is within the framework of the "Western Project"
that the energy transport blockade of Armenia is being implemented.
"It is not just about laying the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline or
the railway blockade of Armenia, but also what little is known about,
and even less about cutting off Armenia from the development of the
regional high-voltage power line network (Borchka-Ahlha line),
achieved in 2004-2007 within the framework of the Organization of the
Black Sea Economic Cooperation, at the initiative of Turkey and with
the support of the United States and the EU. Or isolating Armenia from
the development of backbone optic-logical networks of broadband
networks and the Internet in the region, in the late 90s and early
2000s," the expert explained.

Concerning Armenia's integration preferences, the expert cites the
opinion polls of the Helsinki Conference and Norway (Vanadzor office).
"So, according to the results of the survey, third of respondents
(33%) considered the desired participation of Armenia in the European
Union, and another third (32%) - in the Eurasian. 12% considered the
desirable participation in both of these unions, and 10% - in none of
them. In August 2016, 41% of the respondents considered the
participation of Armenia in the European Union, and only 25% in the
Eurasian Union. No country in the world has caused such a serious
damage to the positive attitude towards the Eurasian integration
process and Russia, than Russia itself. The situation here was
stabilized only by extraordinary measures: deliveries of Iskander, the
creation of a single field of air defense and missile defense, the
formation of a unified army, the consistent implementation of measures
to extend the life of the Armenian nuclear power plant to 2026-2027,"
he said.

Concerning the agreement on comprehensive and expanded partnership
between Armenia and the EU, the expert, in particular, focused on the
energy component of it. Article 42 of the second chapter of the
agreement states in part: "In the civil nuclear sector, in particular,
to pay special attention to the high level of nuclear safety, based on
IAEA standards and European Union standards and practices, and on the
basis of international guidelines and practices on nuclear safety,
cooperation in this area should include, inter alia: the closure and
safe decommissioning of Metsamor NPP and the early adoption of a "road
map" or plan for this purpose, taking into account the need for
substitution nuclear power plants of new capacity, providing energy
security of the Republic of Armenia and conditions for its sustainable
development".

According to the expert, this formulation contains both positive and
dangerous points. The positive moment is the 2nd block of Metsamor
NPP. "The tasks are important and included in the list of priorities
of the Armenian government," Marajyan said. "Second, the recognized
fact" of the specifics of "Armenia, in the formulation that leaves
freedom in interpreting this very specifics", as well as "emotional
security", the countries deprived of their own hydrocarbon resources
and dependent on the supply of primary energy carriers," he said.

As the third argument of the expert, he cited the fact that he
recognized the need for a substitute Metsamor NPP capable of ensuring
energy security and sustainable development of the republic. Here it
is necessary to emphasize that Metsamor NPP is first of all
"guaranteed generating capacity"(GGM) and only then - a source of
energy. It is the deficit of GGM - the main problem of the Armenian
energy. It is the GGM that is the basis for energy security and the
key to its development in the long term (solar, wind energy, small
hydropower plants, and can not serve as substitute power for nuclear
power plants.) For Armenia, these are either a new nuclear unit (and
this, by the way, is the second principle of a state energy strategy
developed by the government and approved by the President of Armenia
in 2015.) Either large hydropower stations with reservoirs of
long-term regulation, and nothing more," Marajyan said.

The concealed dangers of the text of the agreement, in his opinion,
should be attributed to the fact that the above formulation actually
erodes the sole responsibility of the IAEA, the only professional
international organization that has been dealing with the Armenian
nuclear power plant for decades. "Today, after the signing of the
agreement, in the issue of the Armenian NPP, and, consequently, in the
matter of choosing the technology of the new nuclear power plant unit,
Euratom and its 28 members joined the IAEA. The situation here
alarmingly resembles attempts to blur the single mandate of the Minsk
Group for the settlement of the confrontation in Artsakh, or attempts
by the US and Israel to dilute the mandate of the same IAEA to monitor
the implementation of the agreement on Iran's nuclear program," the
expert said.

Summing up, according to Marajyan, it turns out that Prague (sells
weapons to Azerbaijan and calling for lifting the EU's restrictions on
the sale of lethal weapons to this country), Warsaw (with its
military- strategic cooperation with Turkey within NATO, including
missile defense and nuclear weapons), or Budapest - with its close
relations with Azerbaijan, as well as Vilnius, Riga or Tallinn, can
effectively and, most importantly, legally, block the use of any
Russian nuclear technology in the construction of a new unit of the
Armenian NPP. Including the technology of WWER-type reactors familiar
to Armenian specialists, which for today, and in the foreseeable
future - are the most reliable, effective, and most importantly
competitive in nuclear energy.

"In the final analysis, all this means that a mechanism has been
created that could potentially deprive Armenia of nuclear energy."
Moreover, a mechanism has been created that can cut Armenia off from
Russia in the most significant, technological, long-term and
science-intensive segment of cooperation," he concluded, saying that
the wording of article 42 of the agreement has some freedom of
interpretation.

Սա կողմնակալ եւ հակահայկական հայտարարություն է. Շարմազանովը՝ Պարագվայի Կոնգրեսի նախագահին

  • 22.12.2017
  •  

  • Հայաստան
  •  

2
 247

ՀՀ ԱԺ փոխնախագահ Էդուարդ Շարմազանովը դեկտեմբերի 22-ին նամակով դիմել է Պարագվայի Հանրապետության Կոնգրեսի Պատգամավորների պալատի նախագահ Պեդրո Լորենսո Ալիանա Ռոդրիգեսին, որտեղ իր մտահոգությունն է հայտնել Կոնգրեսի Պատգամավորների պալատի կողմից ընդունված Լեռնային Ղարաբաղի հիմնախնդրին վերաբերող միակողմանի, հակահայկական հայտարարությունների առնչությամբ, որոնցում խեղաթյուրվում է իրականությունը եւ ներկայացվում բացառապես Ադրբեջանի կեղծ մոտեցումը խնդրի շուրջ, մասնավորապես, 1992 թվականի Խոջալուի դեպքերի վերաբերյալ:


ԱԺ փոխնախագահը նշել է.


«Սա կողմնակալ եւ հակահայկական հայտարարություն է, որը վնաս է հասցնում խաղաղ կարգավորման գործընթացին: Խոջալուի դեպքերի հետ հայկական զորամիավորումները որեւէ առնչություն չունեն եւ չէին էլ կարող ունենալ: Այդ մասին 1992 թվականի ապրիլի 2-ին ռուսական «Независимая газета» թերթին տված հարցազրուցներից մեկում լավագույնս արտահայտվել է Ադրբեջանի նախկին նախագահ Այազ Մութալիբովը՝ նշելով, որ Խոջալուի ողբերգությունը ադրբեջանական ընդդիմությունն է կազմակերպել իրեն տապալելու համար, եւ հայերը ոչ մի առնչություն չունեն»:


Էդուարդ Շարմազանովը հույս է հայտնել, որ այսուհետ կարվի հնարավորը՝ Պարագվայի օրենսդիրներին Հայաստանի եւ ԵԱՀԿ Մինսկի խմբի համանախագահների դիրքորոշումը տեղ հասցնելու եւ այդպիսով կեղծ բանաձեւերի ընդունումից խուսափելու համար: