AAA: Congressman Moran Of Kansas Joins Armenian Caucus

Armenian Assembly of America
122 C Street, NW, Suite 350
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 202-393-3434
Fax: 202-638-4904
Email: [email protected]
Web:
 
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 20, 2004
CONTACT: David Zenian
Email: [email protected]

CONGRESSMAN MORAN OF KANSAS JOINS ARMENIAN CAUCUS

Washington, DC – At the urging of Armenian Assembly activists, fifth
term Congressman Jerry Moran (R-KS) joined the Congressional Caucus
on Armenian Issues Monday, bringing the total Caucus membership to
date in the 109th Congress to 137.

Congressman Moran, who serves on the Agriculture, Transportation and
Infrastructure and Veteran’s Affairs Committees, was first approached
by Kansas Armenian activists and ARAMAC Kansas State Chair Alex
Kotoyantz, who was instrumental in securing a proclamation earlier
this year designating June 18 as “Kansas-Armenia Partnership Day.”

“I was encouraged by the dedication of people like Alex to
join. The Armenian Caucus has played an important role in the
House of Representatives, and I am proud to be its latest member,”
said Congressman Moran, who becomes the first member of the Kansas
delegation to join the Caucus.

“I have followed the work of the Caucus and its role in building
strong ties between the United States and Armenia, and by joining
this group of dedicated legislators, I hope to do more to further
enhance these already strong relations,” Congressman Moran said.

Welcoming Congressman Moran’s membership in the Caucus, Assembly
Executive Director Ross Vartian said:

“The Assembly extends its appreciation and thanks to Congressman
Moran for his expression of support and decision to be more directly
involved in issues of importance to the Armenian-American community,
including Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh.”

Kotoyantz, a retired geologist and engineer who worked for the Kansas
Department of Transportation for decades, said: “Congressman Moran
did not need any convincing. I am humbled by his decision to join
the Caucus.”

The Armenian Caucus was formed in 1995 to provide a bi-partisan forum
for legislators to discuss how the United States can better assist the
people of Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh. Co-Chaired by Representatives
Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg (R-MI), the Caucus has,
over the years, played a critical role on a wide range of issues,
including assistance programs for Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh, the
ongoing Azerbaijani and Turkish blockades, the Karabakh peace process
and efforts to reaffirm the U.S. record on the Armenian Genocide.

“The Armenian Assembly of America is the largest Washington-based
nationwide organization promoting public understanding and awareness of
Armenian issues. It is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt membership organization.

###

NR#2004-111

Photograph available on the Assembly’s Web site at the following link:

Caption: Congressman Jerry Moran (R-KS)

–Boundary_(ID_3fFVvXX0qsESiehwS9KYVQ)–

http://www.aaainc.org/images/press/2004-111/2004-111-1.jpg
www.armenianassembly.org

EU Talks With Turkey Could Alter Landscape

EU Talks With Turkey Could Alter Landscape
By CONSTANT BRAND

The Associated Press
12/18/04 16:21 EST

BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) – Turkey can expect to be put through a test
of fire when it launches negotiations to join the European Union, and
the process – which will last more than a decade – could transform the
political and social landscape of both Turkey and the 25-nation bloc.

It took a tough, two-day summit to hammer out a compromise agreement
allowing the talks to begin, and now Ankara is looking at an Oct. 3,
2005 date to start negotiations.

The decision is among the most important the EU has made in its
46-year existence but there were few signs of euphoric celebration of
the deal amid deep concerns among many Europeans over the prospect
of letting in a Muslim nation that – with 71 million people – would
be one of the largest members of the club.

French President Jacques Chirac, reflecting staunch opposition among
French citizens, had few positive words at the end of the gathering.

“The route will be long and difficult for Turkey to take all measures
to meet all the conditions demanded to join Europe,” he said.

The divided Mediterranean island of Cyprus was the most prominent
obstacle at the summit, which ended Friday. In the end, Turkey met the
EU demand that it agree to sign a customs deal with the 10 nations –
including Cyprus – that joined the bloc this year. But Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said later the signing does not mean
official recognition of the Greek Cypriot-led government.

So the question of Cyprus – where Turkey has troops stationed in
Turkish-Cypriot-run enclave in the north – remains open. The summit
also set a number of other conditions on internal reforms before the
start of talks.

And many EU states are lukewarm to even starting talks with Turkey –
so they may try to appease opposition at home by putting up added
stumbling blocks during the negotiations to delay its entry.

Chirac, who has promised a referendum on Turkish membership if the
talks succeed, said Ankara would have to recognize the mass killings
of Armenians in the early 20th century.

Austrian Chancellor Wolfgang Schuessel said he would also call a
referendum because bringing a Muslim country into the EU “must not
be decided in an ivory tower … We cannot be indifferent about
public opinion.”

While Turkey takes on changes to win membership, some Europeans fear
that Turkey’s entry would mean devastating change for the union, even
causing the bloc’s collapse setting back the nearly 50-year drive to
unify the continent so it can rival the United States and China.

Countries may be less willing to tear down barriers within the bloc
if it means dealing with the economic and social consequences of a
Muslim nation of Turkey’s size.

For example, France and Poland, who benefit most from EU farm
subsidies, have said they are opposed to granting similar benefits
to Turkey’s agricultural sector, which will dwarf all others, and so
put an end to joint handouts.

Also many countries fear that further integrating rights of free
movement across the EU would lead to a mass migration of poorer Turks
to other EU countries, something they want to avoid, fearing they
will take away local jobs.

Then there is the widespread worry among many Europeans that Turkey’s
Muslim culture – though its government is resolutely secular – will
not click with their Judeo-Christian values.

Jacques Attali, a former adviser to French President Francois
Mitterand, wrote in the Belgian daily Le Soir, advocating a breakaway
“core” of countries pursuing closer ties within the EU. “We need to
recreate the federation with only a few states, but not with the same
EU structures,” he said.

Several critical newspapers said the deal with Turkey would mark
the end of the EU’s political ambitions to become a power on the
world stage.

Germany’s Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said German Chancellor Gerhard
Schroeder, who staunchly backed Turkey’s bid, “could go down in history
… as the German chancellor during whose term in office and with
whose approval the idea of a politically united Europe was abandoned.”

The Czech Republic’s biggest daily, Mlada Fronta Dnes said Turkey’s
membership might be a “bite too hard for Brussels to swallow.”

“The individual states … will lack will to closely cooperate,”
it said in an editorial.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso had to deny rumors
this week of fears that the EU’s constitution, which still faces
ratification, would have to be scrapped to reformulate how the EU
makes decisions ahead of Turkey’s entry to ensure its influence would
not dominate over older members.

Although Turkey’s current population of 71 million is smaller than
that of Germany – currently 82 million – it is expected to grow to
80-85 million by 2020 and nearly 89 million by 2025, while Germany’s
population is predicted to fall slightly. As the largest country in
the EU, Turkey would have the most votes in the bloc’s decision-making
bodies.

The clock has already started ticking for Turkey to meet the conditions
prior to starting the October negotiations, which the EU warned offered
“no guarantee” of success.

It will have to deliver results in meeting “benchmarks” on a number of
key issues from Kurdish rights to ensuring “zero-tolerance” of torture,
and passing additional penal code reforms. Erdogan will also have to
make good on recognizing Cyprus.

Jumping that first hurdle, Turkey then faces a test in a vast array
of policy areas to meet minimum standards before talks begin in such
complex policy issues like environmental protection laws or food
safety standards.

And during the negotiations, any of the EU’s 25 nations can call for
a freeze in the talks if they feel Turkey is backtracking on reforms.

Josep Borrell, president of the European Parliament reiterated calls
that EU leaders as well as Turkey had to sell the negotiations to
their citizens if they wanted them to succeed and be welcomed.

“Turkey … is not a candidate like any other,” Borrell wrote in
Le Soir. “The question of Turkey divides Europeans. It pushes the
geographical, historic and political limit of Europe … but Turkey
should not be rejected because the majority of its population is
Muslim.”

EDITORS NOTE: Constant Brand has covered European Union affairs for
The Associated Press in Brussels since 1999.

BAKU: President: There are Forces Trying to Harm Azeri-GeorgianRelat

President: There are Forces Trying to Harm Azeri-Georgian Relations

Baku Today
Dec 18 2004

Commenting on the current situation on the Georgian-Azerbaijani border,
President Ilham Aliyev told journalists on Friday that the issue has
been clarified.

“All problems on the border will be eliminated after we make sure that
no cargo is passed to Armenia,” underlined the President, saying that
Azerbaijan and Georgia are committed to fighting contraband.

Aliyev noted that consignments are smuggled to Armenia through
Azerbaijan, President Aliyev said: “We will not have this happen
again”. He stressed that the border will remain closed until a normal
work schedule in Georgia is provided.

Expressing his stance on the recent incident involving Azerbaijanis
living in Georgia, President Aliyev said that a peaceful life of
Azerbaijanis abroad is a very important issue for the state.

“There are forces trying to harm the friendly relations between the
two countries. We know who they are. Unfortunately, there are such
forces in Azerbaijan as well. However, the main forces are outside
the country. We cannot allow hurting the strategic partnership between
Georgia and Azerbaijan.”

President Aliyev called on the Azerbaijanis living in Georgia to
respect the laws of the country and not to commit violations. He
also voiced his confidence that all the outstanding discrepancies
will be eliminated.

EC’s Announcement On The Occasion Of Turkey’s Bid To Enter EU

EC’s Announcement On The Occasion Of Turkey’S Bid To Enter Eu

Azg/arm
17 Dec 04

The European Commission, being EU’s executive body, has officially
announced about its readiness to negotiate with Turkey for its
political and economic integration into the European community. The
leaders of European states have to give their consent to start the
talks over Turkey’s accession to EU at the forthcoming EU summit.

No other EU bid has ever aroused so many controversial responses in
the European public and governments as Turkey’s appeal did. Despite
Turkey’s wide-ranging efforts to enlarge the circle of the supporters,
the polls show that only 1/3 of Europeans is ready to boost latter’s
bid.

Membership in the united family of the European nations supposes
that a country should secure human rights and freedom, follow the
principle of true democracy, peace and good neighborhood.

Yet, the whole history of the Turkish state and the history of its
relations with the Armenian nation give all the grounds to doubt
that Turkey will stick to European principles and values in case
it is admitted to the EU. Unfortunately the fact that the Ottoman
Turkey was once admitted to the family of the civilized nations
for its participation in the Crimean War of 1854-1856 did not turn
Turkey into a country with European civilization. Just the contrary,
Turkey implemented the policy of systematic elimination of enslaved
nations – Armenians, Greeks, Bulgarians, Serbs, Assyrians, Maronites
and many others.

The present-day Turkey refuses to recognize the fact of the cruelest
crime against humanity, elimination of 1.5 million Armenians in the
Western Armenia, carries on the decade-long illegal blockade of the
Republic of Armenia thus maintaining tension in the Armenian-Turkish
relations and the threat of genocide reoccurrence.

Turkey ignores continual appeals of the European parliament to
recognize the Armenian Genocide and the request to take off the
blockade thus creating a ground for reconciliation and solution for
the Armenian Cause. EUâ~@~Ys this claim should become one of the
preconditions of Turkeyâ~@~Ys accession. Turkey is ignoring EUâ~@~Ys
other standards too, particularly in securing social and civil rights
of national minorities, in renouncing its chauvinistic policy and
genocidal practice that are obligatory conditions of the Copenhagen
criteria for EU accession. Turkeyâ~@~Ys approaches to justice and
international law should be real and not ostentatious.

The World Armenian Congress considers that Turkeyâ~@~Ys refusal
to denounce the crime of Armenian Genocide, refusal to apply
international standards in settling quarrelsome issues with Greece,
refusal to submit to UNâ~@~Ys numerous decisions disapproving of
Turkeyâ~@~Ys occupation of Cyprus and division of its territory,
refusal to recognize the rights of Kurdish national minority,
continual suppression of individual, group and religious freedoms
make this country unacceptable for the EU.

How is the united Europe going to become a common house for Turkey if
its authorities do not realize the need of following the principals
and standards of a civilized community?

We are sure that the West, particularly Europe, that was putting
morality as a cornerstone in the policy of Bosnia and Kosovo, will
apply the same criterion in considering Turkeyâ~@~Ys accession to EU.

Ara Abrahamian, President of the World Armenian Congress, UNESCO
Goodwill Ambassador

–Boundary_(ID_Om6MpFgDpKKCyFyQUj9BvQ)–

Statement On EU-Turkey Accession Talks

PRESS RELEASE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia
Contact: Information Desk
Tel: (374-1) 52-35-31
Email: [email protected]
Web:

Statement on EU-Turkey Accession Talks

Armenia welcomes the December 15 vote of the European Parliament which
calls on the European Commission and the European Union Council to
demand that Turkey recognizes the historical reality of the Armenian
Genocide, and opens the border with Armenia without delay. As expected,
the decision of the European Council to begin accession talks in 2005
has been announced. Armenia hopes that the recommendations of the
European Parliament will be made part of the EU ­ Turkey agenda.

We have frequently stated that Turkey¹s membership in the European
Union can be beneficial to Armenia and can have a positive impact
on the region, if Turkey meets all criteria. In this regard, Armenia
has asked the EU countries to take into consideration the fact that
Turkey continues to unilaterally keep the Armenian border closed, to
criminalize the use of the term genocide, and to place unacceptable
pre-conditions before beginning the process of normalizing relations
with Armenia.

The decision of the European Parliament demonstrates that the European
community understands and shares Armenia¹s concerns regarding the
present unacceptable state of Armenian-Turkish relations. This
situation, with all implied uncertainties, is a serious threat to the
development of the South Caucasus, as well as to European prospects.

We are convinced that if Turkey responds to the appeals of the European
community, then it will be much easier to overcome all obstacles and
secure stability and prosperity for our region. That would also be a
strong signal that Turkey is ready to enter the European Union with
a clean slate.

–Boundary_(ID_AofurzrfgO3bTt2QRP7ANw)–

http://www.ArmeniaForeignMinistry.am

Turkey Makes 11th Hour Plea to Europe

Turkey Makes 11th Hour Plea to Europe

Spiegel International, Germany
Dec 16 2004

Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is getting nervous as
Friday’s decision approaches. Will Turkey be allowed to start
accession negotiations with the European Union or won’t it? On
Thursday he appeals to the citizens of Europe to open up the door for
his country to join.

Friday’s decision on whether to begin European Union accession
negotiations with Turkey is fast approaching and the press coverage
leading up to the historic decision is becoming even more relentless.
Article after article looks at the mood in Turkey , at pro and con
arguments and at what Turkey’s potential accession means for the EU.
German editorialists are having a field day and most major German
dailies lead with the story on Thursday.

As so often happens in Germany, it is the thin and often trashy
tabloid Bild that steals all the thunder. On page two, it prints
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s open letter to “my
European friends.” There isn’t much in the article that is likely to
change the debate on Thursday and Friday in Brussels, but he does,
yet again, run through Turkey’s arguments for why a “yes” vote on
Friday would be the right one.

After outlining a brief history of Turkey’s courtship with the EU,
Erdogan writes: “Turkey has fulfilled all of the (reform) demands
asked of it and thereby created a solid basis for a positive
decision. … There should be no doubt that we will not now cease
following this path; rather we will continue to move ahead.” Erdogan
also reminds Bild readers once more what the European Union stands
for. “The European Union is dedicated to the principle of ‘Unity in
Diversity.’ I would consider it inconsistent and also dangerous if
one were to attempt to adhere to this idea while at the same time
denouncing Turkey for its different culture and religion.” Finally,
in a small dig at the debate currently raging in many European
countries over the integration of Muslim immigrants, Erdogan argues
that keeping Turkey out of the EU “would be very harmful for
integration and could very well reach the exact opposite result. The
EU should look less to the present and more to the middle and long
term.”

Commentaries in the rest of Germany’s dailies are relatively
predictable. The conservative daily Die Welt, which recently
published an article called “10 Reasons Against an EU Accession for
Turkey,” runs a long front page editorial by Editor in Chief Roger
Koeppel. “The problem, the scandal, is that a decision is being made
before a broad public debate could get started. Neither (German
Chancellor Gerhard) Schroeder nor (Italian Prime Minister Silvio)
Berlusconi, nor (Great Britain Prime Minister Tony) Blair or other
advocates of accession can honestly answer the questions which they
carelessly declare resolved: What will it all cost? Who will pay?
What is to be done if there is a wave of immigrants to Germany?” His
contribution can be summed up in one sentence: “The doubts,” he
writes, “are justified.”

Another conservative paper, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung also
comes out solidly against a Turkey EU membership. The daily points
out that there are many hurdles Turkey has yet to overcome — the
diplomatic recognition of EU member Cyprus, for example, and the
acknowledgement of the early 20th century ethnic cleansing
perpetrated against its Armenian population. The paper argues that
the EU lacks the courage to address these issues. Referring to the
European Parliament’s approval of starting membership negotiations
with Turkey on Wednesday, the paper writes: “The European Parliament
has now climbed the peak of cowardice. The report writers have
established that Turkey hasn’t yet fulfilled all of the criteria, but
recommended a beginning of negotiations anyway. And the parliament,
where delusions of grandeur have recently found a home, rubber
stamped it. Is there any level (of EU government) where the interests
of Europe are considered?”

Siding for Ankara is the left-of-center daily Die Tagesspiegel, which
devotes the first six pages of Thursday’s paper to Turkey, with a
long editorial by Sadik al-Azm, a well-respected intellectual in the
Arab world. He focuses on the positive example Turkey has set in the
Arab region and notes that now, slowly, many countries in the region
are beginning to follow that example. Al-Azm mentions that, whereas
before many in the Arab world were only too happy to criticize Turkey
for its secular government and democratic political system, many are
now praising the state it has become. Speaking of Egypt, he writes,
“without the Turkish example, the Muslim brothers would never have
had the will and boldness to introduce their new, advanced reform
plan for Egypt.”

Finally, the financial daily Handelsblatt presents readers with a
horror vision of the disintegration of the EU, but then spins it into
something positive. “There’s no doubt that Turkish membership could
mean the end of the old EU as we know it. Many see this as the real
danger. But it could present an historic chance for a new EU facing
the challenges of the 21st century. Why shouldn’t the EU reinvent
itself as a large community of values, prosperity and security, which
could integrate not just Turkey, but also Ukraine?”

Armenia Participates in Olympic Arts Festival 2004 in Washington, DC

PRESS RELEASE
December 14, 2004
Embassy of the Republic of Armenia
2225 R Street, NW, Washington, DC 20008
Tel: 202-319-1976, x. 348; Fax: 202-319-2982
Email: [email protected]; Web:

Armenia Participates in Olympic Arts Festival 2004 in Washington, DC

The Embassy of Greece and the European Commission Delegation in Washington,
DC are hosting the exhibition “Olympic Truce: Pieces of Peace,” showcasing
distinct works of artists from the international community, submitted by
foreign embassies in Washington. The exhibition is organized as part of the
Olympic Arts Festival 2004, celebrating the return of the Olympic Games to
its birthplace, Greece.

The Embassy of Armenia was one of 102 embassies participating in the
exhibition. Armenia was represented by artist Emma Gregorian.

The exhibition “Olympic Truce: Pieces of Peace” was opened on December 13,
2004 at the European Commission Delegation in Washington, DC by the Greek
Ambassador to the U.S. and the head of the European Commission Delegation.
Senator Paul Sarbanes, Armenian Ambassador to the U.S., Dr. Arman
Kirakossian, and other foreign Ambassadors took part in the opening
ceremony.

For more information on the Olympic Arts Festival 2004, please visit

http://www.helleniccomserve.com/olympicsarts.htm
www.armeniaemb.org

3 questions a …Orhan Pamuk

L’Express, France
lundi 13 Décembre 2004

3 questions à…Orhan Pamuk

Propos recueillis par Nükte V. Ortaq

Orhan Pamuk est l’un des plus grands écrivains turcs contemporains,
qui est l’auteur de six romans, dont quatre ont été traduits en
français

Quels sont les effets, sur la Turquie, du processus d’intégration
dans l’Union européenne?

La Turquie est en train de devenir un véritable Etat de droit. Le
risque d’être confronté soit à un coup d’Etat militaire, soit à
l’arrivée d’un régime islamiste s’éloigne. Nous nous libérons
progressivement du complexe d’infériorité qu’avait fait naître la
chute de l’Empire ottoman. On commence peu à peu à parler, par
exemple, de la question arménienne, alors qu’auparavant ceux qui,
courageusement, brisaient ce tabou étaient violemment attaqués. Le
rêve européen provoque une transformation en profondeur de notre
société. Un peu à la manière du rêve napoléonien, tel qu’il est
décrit dans les romans de Stendhal.

L’Union européenne est-elle consciente de l’ampleur de ce changement?

Je souhaite que ceux qui tracent aujourd’hui la destinée de l’Europe
ne passent pas à côté de cette transmutation, à l’origine de laquelle
ils sont.

Les conditions draconiennes que l’Union européenne impose à la
Turquie vous paraissent-elles excessives?

L’important à mes yeux, plus que l’accession elle-même, c’est le
chemin qui y conduit. Tout ce que l’Europe demande contribue à
démocratiser ce pays. Bien sûr, je sais que certains politiciens
européens cherchent en réalité à exclure la Turquie en multipliant
les conditions. Mais, tant qu’il s’agit d’exigences qui ne ferment
pas la porte à la Turquie, cela ne m’offusque pas. C’est à nous de
convaincre.

Int’l Union of Socialist Youth recognized Armenian Genocide

PanArmenian News
Dec 13 2004

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF SOCIALIST YOUTH RECOGNIZED ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

13.12.2004 16:36

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ “The IUSY and its organizations decide to pay their
respect to the victims of the Armenian Genocide, which is to have its
90th anniversary on April 24, 2005; IUSY recognizes and condemns the
described acts in order to obtain international recognition of the
genocide committed against the Armenian people; and IUSY calls the
European Union to recognize the Armenian Genocide, the world congress
of the International Union of Socialist Youth (IUSY) convened on
December 3-5 in the Chilean capital. Yerkir newspaper reports
according the Armenian Youth Federation of the Dashnaktsutyun party.
The IUSY is a Socialist International organization consisting of 143
socialist, social democratic, labor and student organizations of 100
countries. The AYF is a full member of the IUSY.

UE: Bruxelles face aux pretentions d’Ankara

Le Figaro, France
11 décembre 2004

Non à un élargissement excessif !;
UNION EUROPÉENNE Bruxelles face aux prétentions d’Ankara

Par RUDOLF SCHARPING *

Il ne fait aucun doute qu’en l’état actuel des choses, la Turquie
n’est pas en mesure de devenir membre de l’UE. Si ce pays a accompli
des progrès tout à fait étonnants en un laps de temps des plus court,
il demeure toutefois fort éloigné encore de l’objectif : la société
civile est loin d’être stable ; la Turquie n’assume pas son histoire
dans son intégralité, je pense notamment au génocide arménien. Les
droits de la femme ne sont pas garantis. Les ressortissants turcs
continuent de former le groupe le plus important de réfugiés
politiques en Allemagne. Il faudra attendre plusieurs années et
quelques conflits pour voir si le contrôle du civil sur le militaire
ou l’interdiction de la torture constituent les piliers réels et
durablement acceptés d’une démocratie fondée sur un État de droit
véritable. Pour toutes ces raisons, on ne saurait répéter
l’expérience des années précédentes : l’entame de négociations ne
peut déboucher de manière quasi automatique sur une adhésion.
Pourtant, nombre d’enthousiastes plaident pour l’intégration de la
Turquie. À l’exception du cas de l’Allemagne, ils comptent aussi,
dans leurs pays ou leurs partis respectifs, au rang des sceptiques
résolus lorsqu’il est question d’approfondir l’intégration
européenne. C’est là un fait qu’il nous faut considérer avec
attention. Car, à l’avenir, tout élargissement de l’UE constituera un
«test double», portant sur la capacité d’intégration du pays en
question et sur la capacité d’élargissement de l’Union européenne.

En effet, une Europe dont le corps devient toujours plus massif, mais
dont la musculature politique reste faible, ne sert pas plus les
intérêts de ses citoyens qu’elle ne répond à sa responsabilité au
plan mondial. Nous sommes nombreux à le percevoir, instinctivement.
D’où l’émergence du scepticisme et du refus, y compris en Allemagne.
Et tandis que les uns prônent l’apaisement, arguant que cela n’est
pas pour demain et ne se passera pas comme le craignent les citoyens
et qu’ils ont bien les choses en main, d’autres brandissent d’un ton
hésitant l’idée d’un «partenariat privilégié», sans investir ce
concept d’une signification tangible. Ces attitudes ne sont pas de
nature à aller à la rencontre des citoyens ou à leur donner confiance
dans les capacités de leurs dirigeants. En dépit du grand progrès que
constitue le traité constitutionnel, le corpus institutionnel ne
répond ni à l’exigence de transparence démocratique et d’attribution
claire des compétences, ni à celle d’une action menée avec précaution
et efficacité. Il suffit pour s’en convaincre de considérer le nombre
de députés européens, la taille et la composition de la Commission ou
la pondération des voix au sein du Conseil européen, notamment après
les adhésions à venir. Non, il est de l’intérêt de l’Europe dans son
ensemble que l’UE des Vingt-Cinq s’engage désormais dans une longue
phase de consolidation interne, notamment après l’intégration de la
Bulgarie, de la Roumanie et, probablement, de la Croatie. La
consolidation doit donc être un préalable absolu à tout nouvel
élargissement. Chaque nouveau membre renforce l’obligation de
réformer la politique structurelle et, surtout, la politique
agricole. Cette obligation s’imposerait, ne serait-ce que pour
honorer nos idéaux d’un meilleur développement des parties
désespérément pauvres de notre village global. On peut également
envisager la question des frontières. Toute extension de celles-ci
présuppose volonté et courage, mais, aussi et surtout, d’arrêter des
critères clairs : qui entend intégrer la Turquie tout en barrant la
route de l’UE aux pays des Balkans, à l’Ukraine, ou à d’autres États
? Et qu’est-ce qui différencie, sur le plan sécuritaire, économique,
culturel, historique ou linguistique, l’Anatolie orientale de Tunis,
Rabat ou Casablanca ? Sans parler même d’Israël. Autant de questions
en suspens qui soulignent une lacune lourde de conséquences : il n’y
a pas de politique étrangère commune, même si l’on note, sur des
questions tout à fait importantes, et je ne veux pas sous-estimer ce
fait, des efforts en vue d’une action commune. Toutefois, ces efforts
concernent les «Grands» de l’Union – et non l’Union dans son
ensemble, qui propose, quant à elle, le concept de «wider Europe» ou
une politique de voisinage, laquelle peut permettre de jeter un pont
vers l’Europe, mais ne suffira pas à plus long terme. Faute d’une
politique étrangère et de sécurité commune, faute de conceptions
communes de nos intérêts et de notre responsabilité dans le monde,
tout élargissement fera de l’Europe un marché doté d’une certaine
dose de protection commune des frontières extérieures et de la
sécurité intérieure, ou doté d’un espace juridique commun. C’est déjà
beaucoup. Mais cela ne répond pas à la responsabilité mondiale de
l’Europe. Devenir un partenaire à part entière des Etats-Unis et
demeurer leur ami fiable, pouvoir regarder dans les yeux les
puissances émergentes que sont la Chine, l’Inde, ou encore à nouveau
la Russie, et ancrer de manière irréversible l’idée européenne dans
le coeur et l’esprit des citoyens européens exige des hommes d’État
des accomplissements réellement nouveaux. Dans le cas contraire, tout
nouvel élargissement accroîtra les problèmes de l’Union. C’est
probablement pour cette raison que le président Chirac a plaidé,
devant le Bundestag allemand, pour que chacun puisse avancer à des
vitesses différentes et pour une intégration «différenciée». Quant au
ministre fédéral des Affaires étrangères, il a tenu sa célèbre
allocution à l’université Humboldt à titre privé. C’est pourquoi le
ministre n’entend pas s’en souvenir (ou qu’on la lui rappelle). Les
élargissements devraient-ils «forcer» le noyau dur de l’Europe ? Il
m’apparaît préférable de disposer d’une stratégie claire et de
travailler proprement. Tout autre évolution contribuera à accroître
plus encore la distance entre l’Europe et ses citoyens et à
dépouiller cette oeuvre pacifique extraordinaire de son lustre, de sa
force et de son avenir. * Ancien président de parti et président du
groupe parlementaire du SPD, Rudolf Scharping a occupé, jusqu’en
2002, les fonctions de ministre fédéral de la Défense au sein du
gouvernement Schröder.